Abstract
Freeze-in dark matter (DM) mediated by a light (≪ keV) weakly-coupled dark-photon is an important benchmark for the emerging low-mass direct detection program. Since this is one of the only predictive, detectable freeze-in models, we investigate how robustly such testability extends to other scenarios. For concreteness, we perform a detailed study of models in which DM couples to a light scalar mediator and acquires a freeze-in abundance through Higgs-mediator mixing. Unlike dark-photons, whose thermal properties weaken stellar cooling bounds, the scalar coupling to Standard Model (SM) particles is subject to strong astrophysical constraints, which severely limit the fraction of DM that can be produced via freeze-in. While it seems naively possible to compensate for this reduction by increasing the mediator-DM coupling, sufficiently large values eventually thermalize the dark sector with itself and yield efficient DM annihilation to mediators, which depletes the freeze-in population; only a small window of DM candidate masses near the ∼ GeV scale can accommodate the total observed abundance. Since many qualitatively similar issues arise for other light mediators, we find it generically difficult to realize a viable freeze-in scenario in which production arises only from renormalizable interactions with SM particles. We also comment on several model variations that may evade these conclusions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. Bertone and D. Hooper, A history of dark matter, arXiv:1605.04909 [INSPIRE].
L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches — Current status and future prospects, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (2018) 066201 [arXiv:1707.06277] [INSPIRE].
J. Alexander et al., Dark sectors 2016 workshop: community report, arXiv:1608.08632 [INSPIRE].
M. Battaglieri et al., US cosmic visions: new ideas in dark matter 2017: community report, arXiv:1707.04591 [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky, Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 076007 [arXiv:1108.5383] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig et al., First direct detection limits on sub-GeV dark matter from XENON10, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 021301 [arXiv:1206.2644] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu, New constraints and prospects for sub-GeV dark matter scattering off electrons in Xenon, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 043017 [arXiv:1703.00910] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, Y. Zhao and K.M. Zurek, Superconducting detectors for superlight dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011301 [arXiv:1504.07237] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, T. Lin and K.M. Zurek, Detecting ultralight bosonic dark matter via absorption in superconductors, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 015019 [arXiv:1604.06800] [INSPIRE].
P.W. Graham, D.E. Kaplan, S. Rajendran and M.T. Walters, Semiconductor probes of light dark matter, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 (2012) 32 [arXiv:1203.2531] [INSPIRE].
SENSEI collaboration, J. Tiffenberg, M. Sofo-Haro et al., Single-electron and single-photon sensitivity with a silicon Skipper CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 131802 [arXiv:1706.00028] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig et al., Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter with semiconductor targets, JHEP 05 (2016) 046 [arXiv:1509.01598] [INSPIRE].
H.J. Maris, G.M. Seidel and D. Stein, Dark matter detection using helium evaporation and field ionization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181303 [arXiv:1706.00117] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, M. Pyle, Y. Zhao and K.M. Zurek, Detecting superlight dark matter with Fermi-degenerate materials, JHEP 08 (2016) 057 [arXiv:1512.04533] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg et al., Detection of sub-MeV dark matter with three-dimensional Dirac materials, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015004 [arXiv:1708.08929] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg et al., Directional detection of dark matter with two-dimensional targets, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 239 [arXiv:1606.08849] [INSPIRE].
P.C. Bunting, G. Gratta, T. Melia and S. Rajendran, Magnetic bubble chambers and sub-GeV dark matter direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095001 [arXiv:1701.06566] [INSPIRE].
R. Budnik, O. Chesnovsky, O. Slone and T. Volansky, Direct detection of light dark matter and solar neutrinos via color center production in crystals, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 242 [arXiv:1705.03016] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, J. Mardon, O. Slone and T. Volansky, Detection of sub-GeV dark matter and solar neutrinos via chemical-bond breaking, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 056011 [arXiv:1608.02940] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov and J. Pradler, Big Bang nucleosynthesis as a probe of new physics, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 60 (2010) 539 [arXiv:1011.1054].
A. Berlin and N. Blinov, Thermal dark matter below an MeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 021801 [arXiv:1706.07046] [INSPIRE].
J. McDonald, Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249] [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [arXiv:0911.1120] [INSPIRE].
X. Chu, T. Hambye and M.H.G. Tytgat, The four basic ways of creating dark matter through a portal, JCAP 05 (2012) 034 [arXiv:1112.0493] [INSPIRE].
J.H. Chang, R. Essig and S.D. McDermott, Revisiting supernova 1987A constraints on dark photons, JHEP 01 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1611.03864] [INSPIRE].
E. Hardy and R. Lasenby, Stellar cooling bounds on new light particles: plasma mixing effects, JHEP 02 (2017) 033 [arXiv:1611.05852] [INSPIRE].
S. Knapen, T. Lin and K.M. Zurek, Light dark matter: models and constraints, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115021 [arXiv:1709.07882] [INSPIRE].
F. Kahlhoefer, S. Kulkarni and S. Wild, Exploring light mediators with low-threshold direct detection experiments, JCAP 11 (2017) 016 [arXiv:1707.08571] [INSPIRE].
C. Kouvaris, I.M. Shoemaker and K. Tuominen, Self-interacting dark matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 043519 [arXiv:1411.3730] [INSPIRE].
G. Krnjaic, Probing light thermal dark-matter with a Higgs portal mediator, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 073009 [arXiv:1512.04119] [INSPIRE].
M. Kaplinghat, S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter halos as particle colliders: unified solution to small-scale structure puzzles from dwarfs to clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 041302 [arXiv:1508.03339] [INSPIRE].
P. Adshead, Y. Cui and J. Shelton, Chilly dark sectors and asymmetric reheating, JHEP 06 (2016) 016 [arXiv:1604.02458] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, PeV-scale dark matter as a thermal relic of a decoupled sector, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1602.08490] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, Thermal dark matter from a highly decoupled sector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 095019 [arXiv:1609.02555] [INSPIRE].
D.J. Kapner et al., Tests of the gravitational inverse-square law below the dark-energy length scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 021101 [hep-ph/0611184] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Geraci et al., Improved constraints on non-Newtonian forces at 10 microns, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 022002 [arXiv:0802.2350] [INSPIRE].
A.O. Sushkov, W.J. Kim, D.A.R. Dalvit and S.K. Lamoreaux, New experimental limits on non-newtonian forces in the micrometer range, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 171101 [arXiv:1108.2547] [INSPIRE].
R.S. Decca et al., Novel constraints on light elementary particles and extra-dimensional physics from the Casimir effect, Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007) 963 [arXiv:0706.3283] [INSPIRE].
J.K. Hoskins, R.D. Newman, R. Spero and J. Schultz, Experimental tests of the gravitational inverse square law for mass separations from 2 cm to 105 cm, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 3084 [INSPIRE].
T. Flacke et al., Phenomenology of relaxion-Higgs mixing, JHEP 06 (2017) 050 [arXiv:1610.02025] [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1705.02358] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Searches for heavy Higgs bosons in two-Higgs-doublet models and for t→ch decay using multilepton and diphoton final states in pp collisions at 8 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 112013 [arXiv:1410.2751] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Constraints on new phenomena via Higgs coupling measurements with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2015) 206 [arXiv:1509.00672].
A. Fradette and M. Pospelov, BBN for the LHC: constraints on lifetimes of the Higgs portal scalars, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 075033 [arXiv:1706.01920] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5 (1967) 32 [INSPIRE].
L.J. Hall, J. March-Russell and S.M. West, A unified theory of matter genesis: asymmetric freeze-in, arXiv:1010.0245 [INSPIRE].
A. Hook, Unitarity constraints on asymmetric freeze-in, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 055003 [arXiv:1105.3728] [INSPIRE].
J. Unwin, Towards cogenesis via asymmetric freeze-in: the χ who came-in from the cold, JHEP 10 (2014) 190 [arXiv:1406.3027] [INSPIRE].
P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini, Cosmic abundances of stable particles: improved analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 145 [INSPIRE].
V. Shtabovenko, FeynCalc 9, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 762 (2016) 012064 [arXiv:1604.06709] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1711.11038
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krnjaic, G. Freezing in, heating up, and freezing out: predictive nonthermal dark matter and low-mass direct detection. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 136 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)136
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)136