Abstract
We consider the extension of techniques for bounding higher-dimension operators in quantum effective field theories to higher-point operators. Working in the context of theories polynomial in X = (∂ϕ)2, we examine how the techniques of bounding such operators based on causality, analyticity of scattering amplitudes, and unitarity of the spectral representation are all modified for operators beyond (∂ϕ)4. Under weak-coupling assumptions that we clarify, we show using all three methods that in theories in which the coefficient λn of the Xn term for some n is larger than the other terms in units of the cutoff, λn must be positive (respectively, negative) for n even (odd), in mostly-plus metric signature. Along the way, we present a first-principles derivation of the propagator numerator for all massive higher-spin bosons in arbitrary dimension. We remark on subtleties and challenges of bounding P(X) theories in greater generality. Finally, we examine the connections among energy conditions, causality, stability, and the involution condition on the Legendre transform relating the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion, JHEP 10 (2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178] [INSPIRE].
A. Jenkins and D. O’Connell, The story of \( \mathcal{O} \) : Positivity constraints in effective field theories, hep-th/0609159 [INSPIRE].
A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban, Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 3521 [hep-th/0612015] [INSPIRE].
G. Dvali, A. Franca and C. Gomez, Road Signs for UV-Completion, arXiv:1204.6388 [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Infrared Consistency and the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JHEP 12 (2014) 087 [arXiv:1407.7865] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, L. Martucci and R. Torre, Symmetries, Sum Rules and Constraints on Effective Field Theories, JHEP 09 (2014) 100 [arXiv:1405.2960] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064076 [arXiv:1509.00851] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Positive Signs in Massive Gravity, JHEP 04 (2016) 002 [arXiv:1601.04068] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Positivity of Curvature-Squared Corrections in Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 051601 [arXiv:1608.02942] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, Softness and amplitudes’ positivity for spinning particles, JHEP 02 (2017) 034 [arXiv:1605.06111] [INSPIRE].
A. Nicolis, R. Rattazzi and E. Trincherini, Energy’s and amplitudes’ positivity, JHEP 05 (2010) 095 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2011) 128] [arXiv:0912.4258] [INSPIRE].
Y. Aharonov, A. Komar and L. Susskind, Superluminal behavior, causality and instability, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969) 1400 [INSPIRE].
X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling, JHEP 02 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1407.5597] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung, J. Liu and G.N. Remmen, Proof of the Weak Gravity Conjecture from Black Hole Entropy, JHEP 10 (2018) 004 [arXiv:1801.08546] [INSPIRE].
C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [INSPIRE].
H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, F. Riva, J. Serra and F. Sgarlata, Beyond Positivity Bounds and the Fate of Massive Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 161101 [arXiv:1710.02539] [INSPIRE].
H. Elvang, D.Z. Freedman, L.-Y. Hung, M. Kiermaier, R.C. Myers and S. Theisen, On renormalization group flows and the a-theorem in 6d, JHEP 10 (2012) 011 [arXiv:1205.3994] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Logunov, B.V. Medvedev, M.A. Mestvirishvili, V.P. Pavlov, M.K. Polivanov and A.D. Sukhanov, Dispersion Relation for the 3 → 3 Forward Amplitude and Generalized Optical Theorem, Theor. Math. Phys. 33 (1978) 935 [INSPIRE].
R.J. Eden, P.V. Landshoff, D.I. Olive and J.C. Polkinghorne, The Analytic S-Matrix, Cambridge University Press, (1966).
M. Chaichian and J. Fischer, Higher Dimensional Space-time and Unitarity Bound on the Scattering Amplitude, Nucl. Phys. B 303 (1988) 557 [INSPIRE].
M. Chaichian, J. Fischer and Yu. S. Vernov, Generalization of the Froissart-Martin bounds to scattering in a space-time of general dimension, Nucl. Phys. B 383 (1992) 151 [INSPIRE].
M.D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press, (2014).
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, Cambridge University Press, (1995).
S.M. Carroll, M. Hoffman and M. Trodden, Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 023509 [astro-ph/0301273] [INSPIRE].
V.A. Rubakov, The Null Energy Condition and its violation, Phys. Usp. 57 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1401.4024] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Feynman Rules for Any Spin, Phys. Rev. 133 (1964) B1318 [INSPIRE].
I. Cortese, R. Rahman and M. Sivakumar, Consistent Non-Minimal Couplings of Massive Higher-Spin Particles, Nucl. Phys. B 879 (2014) 143 [arXiv:1307.7710] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Feynman rules for any spin. iii, Phys. Rev. 181 (1969) 1893 [INSPIRE].
T. Miyamoto, Kinematics of Higher-Spin Fields, MSc Thesis, Imperial College London, U.K., (2011), http://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/research-centres-and-groups/theoretical-physics/msc/dissertations/2011/Tomokazu-Miyamoto-Dissertation.pdf.
K. Hayashi, High spin propagation of massive and massless particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969) 214 [INSPIRE].
L.P.S. Singh and C.R. Hagen, Lagrangian formulation for arbitrary spin. 1. The boson case, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 898 [INSPIRE].
P. Nayak, R.R. Poojary and R.M. Soni, A Note on S-matrix Bootstrap for Amplitudes with Linear Spectrum, arXiv:1707.08135 [INSPIRE].
K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012) 671 [arXiv:1105.3735] [INSPIRE].
F. Cardin and M. Favretti, When is a vector field injective?, Nonlinear Differ. Eq. Appl. 5 (1998) 397.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1804.03153
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chandrasekaran, V., Remmen, G.N. & Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A. Higher-point positivity. J. High Energ. Phys. 2018, 15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)015
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2018)015