Abstract
Jet grooming has emerged as a necessary and vital tool for mitigating contamination radiation in jets. The additional restrictions on emissions imposed by the groomer can result in non-smooth behavior of resulting fixed-order distributions of observables measured on groomed jets. As a concrete example, we study the cusp in the hemisphere mass distribution of e+e− → hadrons events groomed with soft drop. We identify the leading emissions that contribute in the region about the cusp and formulate an all-orders factorization theorem that describes how the cusp is resolved through arbitrary strongly-ordered soft and collinear emissions. The factorization theorem exhibits numerous novel features such as contributions from collinear modes that can cross hemisphere boundaries as well as requiring explicit subtraction of the limit in which resolved emissions become collinear to the hard core. We present resummation of the cusp region through next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy and describe how it can be matched with established factorization theorems that describe other groomed phase space regions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and G.P. Salam, Towards an understanding of jet substructure, JHEP 09 (2013) 029 [arXiv:1307.0007] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Larkoski, S. Marzani, G. Soyez and J. Thaler, Soft Drop, JHEP 05 (2014) 146 [arXiv:1402.2657] [INSPIRE].
S. Marzani, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, A study of jet mass distributions with grooming, JHEP 07 (2017) 132 [arXiv:1704.02210] [INSPIRE].
S. Marzani, L. Schunk and G. Soyez, The jet mass distribution after Soft Drop, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 96 [arXiv:1712.05105] [INSPIRE].
Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu and F. Ringer, The groomed and ungroomed jet mass distribution for inclusive jet production at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2018) 137 [arXiv:1803.03645] [INSPIRE].
Z.-B. Kang, K. Lee, X. Liu and F. Ringer, Soft drop groomed jet angularities at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 41 [arXiv:1811.06983] [INSPIRE].
S. Caletti et al., Jet angularities in Z + jet production at the LHC, JHEP 07 (2021) 076 [arXiv:2104.06920] [INSPIRE].
C. Frye, A.J. Larkoski, M.D. Schwartz and K. Yan, Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm, JHEP 07 (2016) 064 [arXiv:1603.09338] [INSPIRE].
D. Anderle, M. Dasgupta, B.K. El-Menoufi, J. Helliwell and M. Guzzi, Groomed jet mass as a direct probe of collinear parton dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 827 [arXiv:2007.10355] [INSPIRE].
A. Kardos, A.J. Larkoski and Z. Trócsányi, Groomed jet mass at high precision, Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135704 [arXiv:2002.00942] [INSPIRE].
A. Kardos, A.J. Larkoski and Z. Trócsányi, Two- and three-loop data for the groomed jet mass, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 114034 [arXiv:2002.05730] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurements of the differential jet cross section as a function of the jet mass in dijet events from proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 113 [arXiv:1807.05974] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the Soft-Drop Jet Mass in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 092001 [arXiv:1711.08341] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of soft-drop jet observables in pp collisions with the ATLAS detector at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052007 [arXiv:1912.09837] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Andersen et al., Proceedings of Les Houches 2017: Physics at TeV Colliders Standard Model Working Group Report, Les Houches, France, 5–23 June 2017, arXiv:1803.07977 [FERMILAB-CONF-18-122-CD-T] [UWTHPH-2018-5] [INSPIRE].
S. Marzani, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, G. Soyez and V. Theeuwes, Fitting the Strong Coupling Constant with Soft-Drop Thrust, JHEP 11 (2019) 179 [arXiv:1906.10504] [INSPIRE].
F. Ringer, Jet substructure and a possible determination of the QCD coupling, PoS ALPHAS2019 (2019) 010 [INSPIRE].
A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak and I.W. Stewart, Extracting a Short Distance Top Mass with Light Grooming, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074021 [arXiv:1708.02586] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Larkoski, Improving the understanding of jet grooming in perturbation theory, JHEP 09 (2020) 072 [arXiv:2006.14680] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Ellis, C.K. Vermilion and J.R. Walsh, Recombination Algorithms and Jet Substructure: Pruning as a Tool for Heavy Particle Searches, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 094023 [arXiv:0912.0033] [INSPIRE].
D. Krohn, J. Thaler and L.-T. Wang, Jet Trimming, JHEP 02 (2010) 084 [arXiv:0912.1342] [INSPIRE].
M. Dasgupta, A. Fregoso, S. Marzani and A. Powling, Jet substructure with analytical methods, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2623 [arXiv:1307.0013] [INSPIRE].
S. Catani and B.R. Webber, Infrared safe but infinite: Soft gluon divergences inside the physical region, JHEP 10 (1997) 005 [hep-ph/9710333] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer and I.W. Stewart, Invariant operators in collinear effective theory, Phys. Lett. B 516 (2001) 134 [hep-ph/0107001] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I.Z. Rothstein and I.W. Stewart, Hard scattering factorization from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 014017 [hep-ph/0202088] [INSPIRE].
S. Catani, Y.L. Dokshitzer, M.H. Seymour and B.R. Webber, Longitudinally invariant Kt clustering algorithms for hadron hadron collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 406 (1993) 187 [INSPIRE].
S. Brandt, C. Peyrou, R. Sosnowski and A. Wroblewski, The Principal axis of jets. An Attempt to analyze high-energy collisions as two-body processes, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 57 [INSPIRE].
E. Farhi, A QCD Test for Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1587 [INSPIRE].
Y.L. Dokshitzer, G.D. Leder, S. Moretti and B.R. Webber, Better jet clustering algorithms, JHEP 08 (1997) 001 [hep-ph/9707323] [INSPIRE].
M. Wobisch and T. Wengler, Hadronization corrections to jet cross-sections in deep inelastic scattering, in proceedings of the Workshop on Monte Carlo Generators for HERA Physics (Plenary Starting Meeting), Hamburg, Germany, 27–30 April 1998, pp. 270–279 [hep-ph/9907280] [INSPIRE].
M. Dasgupta and G.P. Salam, Resummation of nonglobal QCD observables, Phys. Lett. B 512 (2001) 323 [hep-ph/0104277] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot, Resummation of non-global logarithms and the BFKL equation, JHEP 03 (2018) 036 [arXiv:1501.03754] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Non-Global Logarithms, Factorization, and the Soft Substructure of Jets, JHEP 09 (2015) 143 [arXiv:1501.04596] [INSPIRE].
T. Becher, M. Neubert, L. Rothen and D.Y. Shao, Effective Field Theory for Jet Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 192001 [arXiv:1508.06645] [INSPIRE].
R. Ángeles Martínez, M. De Angelis, J.R. Forshaw, S. Plätzer and M.H. Seymour, Soft gluon evolution and non-global logarithms, JHEP 05 (2018) 044 [arXiv:1802.08531] [INSPIRE].
A.H. Hoang, S. Mantry, A. Pathak and I.W. Stewart, Nonperturbative Corrections to Soft Drop Jet Mass, JHEP 12 (2019) 002 [arXiv:1906.11843] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Larkoski, I. Moult and D. Neill, Factorization and Resummation for Groomed Multi-Prong Jet Shapes, JHEP 02 (2018) 144 [arXiv:1710.00014] [INSPIRE].
B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad and U. Pettersson, Coherence Effects in Deep Inelastic Scattering, Z. Phys. C 43 (1989) 625 [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer, C. Lee, A.V. Manohar and M.B. Wise, Enhanced nonperturbative effects in Z decays to hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 034014 [hep-ph/0309278] [INSPIRE].
A.V. Manohar, Deep inelastic scattering as x → 1 using soft collinear effective theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 114019 [hep-ph/0309176] [INSPIRE].
S.D. Ellis, C.K. Vermilion, J.R. Walsh, A. Hornig and C. Lee, Jet Shapes and Jet Algorithms in SCET, JHEP 11 (2010) 101 [arXiv:1001.0014] [INSPIRE].
C.W. Bauer, F.J. Tackmann, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi, Factorization and Resummation for Dijet Invariant Mass Spectra, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 074006 [arXiv:1106.6047] [INSPIRE].
M.D. Schwartz, Resummation and NLO matching of event shapes with effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 014026 [arXiv:0709.2709] [INSPIRE].
Y.L. Dokshitzer and B.R. Webber, Calculation of power corrections to hadronic event shapes, Phys. Lett. B 352 (1995) 451 [hep-ph/9504219] [INSPIRE].
S. Catani and M.H. Seymour, A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 485 (1997) 291 [Erratum ibid. 510 (1998) 503] [hep-ph/9605323] [INSPIRE].
O.V. Tarasov, A.A. Vladimirov and A.Y. Zharkov, The Gell-Mann-Low Function of QCD in the Three Loop Approximation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 429 [INSPIRE].
G.P. Korchemsky and A.V. Radyushkin, Renormalization of the Wilson Loops Beyond the Leading Order, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 342 [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, CUBA: A Library for multidimensional numerical integration, Comput. Phys. Commun. 168 (2005) 78 [hep-ph/0404043] [INSPIRE].
J. Baron, D. Reichelt, S. Schumann, N. Schwanemann and V. Theeuwes, Soft-drop grooming for hadronic event shapes, JHEP 07 (2021) 142 [arXiv:2012.09574] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele, Multiple Soft Gluon Radiation in Parton Processes, Nucl. Phys. B 313 (1989) 595 [INSPIRE].
S. Catani and M. Grazzini, The soft gluon current at one loop order, Nucl. Phys. B 591 (2000) 435 [hep-ph/0007142] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2108.02779
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Benkendorfer, K., Larkoski, A.J. Grooming at the cusp: all-orders predictions for the transition region of jet groomers. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)188
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2021)188