Abstract
In this work, we make a detailed discussion on the phenomenology of the scotogenic Dirac model, which could accommodate the Dirac neutrino mass and dark matter. We have studied the lepton-flavor-violating (LFV) processes in this model, which are mediated by the charged scalar ϕ± and heavy Dirac fermions Ni. The experimental bounds, especially given by decays μ → eγ and μ → 3e, have put severe constraints on the Yukawa couplings yΦ and masses mN1, mϕ. We select the heavy Dirac fermion N1 as dark matter candidate and find the correct relic density will be reached basically by annihilating through another Yukawa coupling yχ. After satisfying LFV and dark matter relic density constraints, we consider the indirect detections of dark matter annihilating into leptons. But the constraints are relatively loose, only the τ +τ − channel can impose a mild excluding capability. Then we make a detailed discussion on the dark matter direct detections. Although two Yukawa couplings can both contribute to the direct detection processes, more attention has been paid on the yΦ-related processes as the yχ-related process is bounded loosely. The current and future direct detection experiments have been used to set constraints on the Yukawa couplings and masses. The current direct detections bounds are relatively loose and can barely exclude more parameter region beyond the LFV. For the future direct detection experiments, the excluding capacities can be improved due to larger exposures. The detecting capabilities in the large mass region have not been weakened as the existence of mass enhancement from the magnetic dipole operator \( {\mathcal{O}}_{\mathrm{mag}.} \). At last, we have briefly discussed the collider signal searching in this model, the most promising signature is pair produced ϕ + ϕ− and decay into the signal of ℓ+ℓ − + ɆT. The exclusion limits from collider on mN1 and mϕ have provided a complementary detecting capability compared to the LFV and dark matter detections.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562 [hep-ex/9807003] [INSPIRE].
SNO collaboration, Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301 [nucl-ex/0204008] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) × U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra, Mechanism for Understanding Small Neutrino Mass in Superstring Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 561 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1642 [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Naturally small seesaw neutrino mass with no new physics beyond the TeV scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2502 [hep-ph/0011121] [INSPIRE].
M. Malinsky, J.C. Romao and J.W.F. Valle, Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161801 [hep-ph/0506296] [INSPIRE].
A. Zee, Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 264 (1986) 99 [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, Model of ‘Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses, Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 132 [INSPIRE].
L.M. Krauss, S. Nasri and M. Trodden, A Model for neutrino masses and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 085002 [hep-ph/0210389] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
M. Aoki, S. Kanemura and O. Seto, Neutrino mass, Dark Matter and Baryon Asymmetry via TeV-Scale Physics without Fine-Tuning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 051805 [arXiv:0807.0361] [INSPIRE].
Y. Cai, J. Herrero-García, M.A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R.R. Volkas, From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1706.08524] [INSPIRE].
W. Rodejohann, Neutrino-less Double Beta Decay and Particle Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 20 (2011) 1833 [arXiv:1106.1334] [INSPIRE].
M.J. Dolinski, A.W.P. Poon and W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 (2019) 219 [arXiv:1902.04097] [INSPIRE].
T. Han and B. Zhang, Signatures for Majorana neutrinos at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 171804 [hep-ph/0604064] [INSPIRE].
F.F. Deppisch, P.S. Bhupal Dev and A. Pilaftsis, Neutrinos and Collider Physics, New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 075019 [arXiv:1502.06541] [INSPIRE].
Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li and R. Ruiz, Lepton Number Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider Tests, Front. in Phys. 6 (2018) 40 [arXiv:1711.02180] [INSPIRE].
H. Päs and W. Rodejohann, Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay, New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 115010 [arXiv:1507.00170] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for heavy Majorana neutrinos in same-sign dilepton channels in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 01 (2019) 122 [arXiv:1806.10905] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Long, C. Lunardini and E. Sabancilar, Detecting non-relativistic cosmic neutrinos by capture on tritium: phenomenology and physics potential, JCAP 08 (2014) 038 [arXiv:1405.7654] [INSPIRE].
J. Zhang and S. Zhou, Relic Right-handed Dirac Neutrinos and Implications for Detection of Cosmic Neutrino Background, Nucl. Phys. B 903 (2016) 211 [arXiv:1509.02274] [INSPIRE].
E. Roulet and F. Vissani, On the capture rates of big bang neutrinos by nuclei within the Dirac and Majorana hypotheses, JCAP 10 (2018) 049 [arXiv:1810.00505] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and O. Popov, Pathways to Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Masses, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1609.02538] [INSPIRE].
P.-H. Gu and H.-J. He, Neutrino Mass and Baryon Asymmetry from Dirac Seesaw, JCAP 12 (2006) 010 [hep-ph/0610275] [INSPIRE].
P.-H. Gu and U. Sarkar, Radiative Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter and Leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 105031 [arXiv:0712.2933] [INSPIRE].
Y. Farzan and E. Ma, Dirac neutrino mass generation from dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033007 [arXiv:1204.4890] [INSPIRE].
S. Centelles Chuliá, E. Ma, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Dirac Neutrinos and Dark Matter Stability from Lepton Quarticity, Phys. Lett. B 767 (2017) 209 [arXiv:1606.04543] [INSPIRE].
C. Bonilla, E. Ma, E. Peinado and J.W.F. Valle, Two-loop Dirac neutrino mass and WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 214 [arXiv:1607.03931] [INSPIRE].
W. Wang and Z.-L. Han, Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Mass with Intermediate SU(2)L Multiplet Fields, JHEP 04 (2017) 166 [arXiv:1611.03240] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah and A. Dasgupta, Naturally Light Dirac Neutrino in Left-Right Symmetric Model, JCAP 06 (2017) 003 [arXiv:1702.02877] [INSPIRE].
W. Wang, R. Wang, Z.-L. Han and J.-Z. Han, The B − L Scotogenic Models for Dirac Neutrino Masses, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 889 [arXiv:1705.00414] [INSPIRE].
S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Generalized Bottom-Tau unification, neutrino oscillations and dark matter: predictions from a lepton quarticity flavor approach, Phys. Lett. B 773 (2017) 26 [arXiv:1706.00210] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Radiative Left-Right Dirac Neutrino Mass, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 54 [arXiv:1707.07698] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Yao and G.-J. Ding, Systematic Study of One-Loop Dirac Neutrino Masses and Viable Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095004 [Erratum ibid. 98 (2018) 039901] [arXiv:1707.09786] [INSPIRE].
C. Bonilla, J.M. Lamprea, E. Peinado and J.W.F. Valle, Flavour-symmetric type-II Dirac neutrino seesaw mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 257 [arXiv:1710.06498] [INSPIRE].
A. Ibarra, A. Kushwaha and S.K. Vempati, Clockwork for Neutrino Masses and Lepton Flavor Violation, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 86 [arXiv:1711.02070] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah and B. Karmakar, A4 flavour model for Dirac neutrinos: Type I and inverse seesaw, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 461 [arXiv:1712.06407] [INSPIRE].
A. Das, T. Nomura, H. Okada and S. Roy, Generation of a radiative neutrino mass in the linear seesaw framework, charged lepton flavor violation, and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 075001 [arXiv:1704.02078] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Yao and G.-J. Ding, Systematic analysis of Dirac neutrino masses from a dimension five operator, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095042 [arXiv:1802.05231] [INSPIRE].
S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Seesaw roadmap to neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 781 (2018) 122 [arXiv:1802.05722] [INSPIRE].
S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Srivastava and J.W.F. Valle, Seesaw Dirac neutrino mass through dimension-six operators, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 035009 [arXiv:1804.03181] [INSPIRE].
Z.-L. Han and W. Wang, Z l Portal Dark Matter in B − L Scotogenic Dirac Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 839 [arXiv:1805.02025] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah, B. Karmakar and D. Nanda, Common Origin of Dirac Neutrino Mass and Freeze-in Massive Particle Dark Matter, JCAP 07 (2018) 039 [arXiv:1805.11115] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah and B. Karmakar, Linear seesaw for Dirac neutrinos with A4 flavour symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 59 [arXiv:1806.10685] [INSPIRE].
J. Calle, D. Restrepo, C.E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, Minimal radiative Dirac neutrino mass models, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075008 [arXiv:1812.05523] [INSPIRE].
C.D.R. Carvajal and O. Zapata, One-loop Dirac neutrino mass and mixed axion-WIMP dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075009 [arXiv:1812.06364] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Scotogenic U(1)χ Dirac neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 411 [arXiv:1901.09091] [INSPIRE].
S. Saad, Simplest Radiative Dirac Neutrino Mass Models, Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019) 114636 [arXiv:1902.07259] [INSPIRE].
A. Dasgupta, S.K. Kang and O. Popov, Radiative Dirac neutrino mass, neutrinoless quadruple beta decay, and dark matter in B-L extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075030 [arXiv:1903.12558] [INSPIRE].
K. Enomoto, S. Kanemura, K. Sakurai and H. Sugiyama, New model for radiatively generated Dirac neutrino masses and lepton flavor violating decays of the Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015044 [arXiv:1904.07039] [INSPIRE].
S. Jana, V.P.K. and S. Saad, Minimal Dirac neutrino mass models from U(1)R gauge symmetry and left-right asymmetry at colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 916 [arXiv:1904.07407] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Scotogenic cobimaximal Dirac neutrino mixing from ∆(27) and U(1)χ, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 903 [arXiv:1905.01535] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Two-loop Z4 Dirac neutrino masses and mixing, with self-interacting dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B 946 (2019) 114725 [arXiv:1907.04665] [INSPIRE].
D. Restrepo, A. Rivera and W. Tangarife, Singlet-Doublet Dirac Dark Matter and Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 035029 [arXiv:1906.09685] [INSPIRE].
S. Centelles Chuliá, R. Cepedello, E. Peinado and R. Srivastava, Systematic classification of two loop d = 4 Dirac neutrino mass models and the Diracness-dark matter stability connection, JHEP 10 (2019) 093 [arXiv:1907.08630] [INSPIRE].
J. Calle, D. Restrepo and O. Zapata, Dirac neutrino mass generation from a Majorana messenger, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035004 [arXiv:1909.09574] [INSPIRE].
G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 (1996) 195 [hep-ph/9506380] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi et al., The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 203 [arXiv:1703.07364] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302 [arXiv:1708.06917] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
D. Schmidt, T. Schwetz and T. Toma, Direct Detection of Leptophilic Dark Matter in a Model with Radiative Neutrino Masses, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 073009 [arXiv:1201.0906] [INSPIRE].
A. Ibarra, C.E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, Direct Detection of Fermion Dark Matter in the Radiative Seesaw Model, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 035012 [arXiv:1601.01163] [INSPIRE].
J. Herrero-Garcia, E. Molinaro and M.A. Schmidt, Dark matter direct detection of a fermionic singlet at one loop, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 471 [arXiv:1803.05660] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton Portal Dark Matter, JHEP 08 (2014) 153 [arXiv:1402.6696] [INSPIRE].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP collaborations, Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2463 [arXiv:1301.6065] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Cline, K. Kainulainen, P. Scott and C. Weniger, Update on scalar singlet dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055025 [Erratum ibid. 92 (2015) 039906] [arXiv:1306.4710] [INSPIRE].
A. Arhrib, Y.-L.S. Tsai, Q. Yuan and T.-C. Yuan, An Updated Analysis of Inert Higgs Doublet Model in light of the Recent Results from LUX, PLANCK, AMS-02 and LHC, JCAP 06 (2014) 030 [arXiv:1310.0358] [INSPIRE].
D.G. Cerdeno, A. Dedes and T.E.J. Underwood, The Minimal Phantom Sector of the Standard Model: Higgs Phenomenology and Dirac Leptogenesis, JHEP 09 (2006) 067 [hep-ph/0607157] [INSPIRE].
Y. Kuno and Y. Okada, Muon decay and physics beyond the standard model, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73 (2001) 151 [hep-ph/9909265] [INSPIRE].
MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+ → e+ γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays τ ± → e± γ and τ ± → μ± γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802 [arXiv:0908.2381] [INSPIRE].
A.M. Baldini et al., MEG Upgrade Proposal, arXiv:1301.7225 [INSPIRE].
T. Aushev et al., Physics at Super B Factory, arXiv:1002.5012 [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM collaboration, Search for the Decay μ+ → e+ e+ e− , Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].
A. Blondel et al., Research Proposal for an Experiment to Search for the Decay μ → eee, arXiv:1301.6113 [INSPIRE].
R. Kitano, M. Koike and Y. Okada, Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 096002 [Erratum ibid. 76 (2007) 059902] [hep-ph/0203110] [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM II collaboration, Test of lepton flavor conservation in μ → e conversion on titanium, Phys. Lett. B 317 (1993) 631 [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM II collaboration, A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47 (2006) 337 [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM II collaboration, Improved limit on the branching ratio of μ → e conversion on lead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 200 [INSPIRE].
R.J. Barlow, The PRISM/PRIME project, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 218 (2011) 44 [INSPIRE].
R.P. Litchfield, Muon to electron conversion: The COMET and Mu2e experiments, in Interplay between Particle and Astroparticle physics, (2014) [arXiv:1412.1406] [INSPIRE].
Mu2e collaboration, Mu2e Technical Design Report, arXiv:1501.05241 [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23, δCP, and the mass ordering, JHEP 01 (2019) 106 [arXiv:1811.05487] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
T. Toma and A. Vicente, Lepton Flavor Violation in the Scotogenic Model, JHEP 01 (2014) 160 [arXiv:1312.2840] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
A. Vicente and C.E. Yaguna, Probing the scotogenic model with lepton flavor violating processes, JHEP 02 (2015) 144 [arXiv:1412.2545] [INSPIRE].
K.N. Abazajian, S. Horiuchi, M. Kaplinghat, R.E. Keeley and O. Macias, Strong constraints on thermal relic dark matter from Fermi-LAT observations of the Galactic Center, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 043012 [arXiv:2003.10416] [INSPIRE].
H.E.S.S. collaboration, Search for dark matter annihilations towards the inner Galactic halo from 10 years of observations with H.E.S.S, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 111301 [arXiv:1607.08142] [INSPIRE].
CTA collaboration, Prospects for Indirect Dark Matter Searches with the Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA), PoS ICRC2015 (2016) 1203 [arXiv:1508.06128] [INSPIRE].
L. Bergstrom, T. Bringmann, I. Cholis, D. Hooper and C. Weniger, New Limits on Dark Matter Annihilation from AMS Cosmic Ray Positron Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 171101 [arXiv:1306.3983] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Indirect search for dark matter from the Galactic Center and halo with the Super-Kamiokande detector, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 072002 [arXiv:2005.05109] [INSPIRE].
IceCube collaboration, Search for Neutrinos from Dark Matter Self-Annihilations in the center of the Milky Way with 3 years of IceCube/DeepCore, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 627 [arXiv:1705.08103] [INSPIRE].
ANTARES collaboration, Search for dark matter towards the Galactic Centre with 11 years of ANTARES data, Phys. Lett. B 805 (2020) 135439 [arXiv:1912.05296] [INSPIRE].
PandaX collaboration, Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the PandaX-4T experiment, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (2019) 31011 [arXiv:1806.02229] [INSPIRE].
LUX-ZEPLIN collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052002 [arXiv:1802.06039] [INSPIRE].
F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, DirectDM: a tool for dark matter direct detection, arXiv:1708.02678 [INSPIRE].
N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick and W.C. Haxton, Weakly interacting massive particle-nucleus elastic scattering response, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 065501 [arXiv:1308.6288] [INSPIRE].
F. Bishara, J. Brod, B. Grinstein and J. Zupan, From quarks to nucleons in dark matter direct detection, JHEP 11 (2017) 059 [arXiv:1707.06998] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for invisible Higgs boson decays with vector boson fusion signatures with the ATLAS detector using an integrated luminosity of 139 fb−1, Tech. Rep. ATLAS-CONF-2020-008 (2020).
CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 520 [arXiv:1809.05937] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible Higgs boson decays with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 231801 [arXiv:1904.05105] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Searches for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles with compressed mass spectra in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052005 [arXiv:1911.12606] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of charginos, neutralinos and sleptons in final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 05 (2014) 071 [arXiv:1403.5294] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2005.08287
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, SY., Han, ZL. Observable signatures of scotogenic Dirac model. J. High Energ. Phys. 2020, 62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)062
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2020)062