Abstract
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) cause progressive loss of light-sensitive photoreceptors in the eye and can lead to blindness. Gene-based therapies for IRDs have shown remarkable progress in the past decade, but the vast majority of forms remain untreatable. In the era of personalised medicine, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) emerge as a valuable system for cell replacement and to model IRD because they retain the specific patient genome and can differentiate into any adult cell type. Three-dimensional (3D) iPSCs-derived retina-like tissue called retinal organoid contains all major retina-specific cell types: amacrine, bipolar, horizontal, retinal ganglion cells, Müller glia, as well as rod and cone photoreceptors. Here, we describe the main applications of retinal organoids and provide a comprehensive overview of the state-of-art analysis methods that apply to this model system. Finally, we will discuss the outlook for improvements that would bring the cellular model a step closer to become an established system in research and treatment development of IRDs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) comprise a genetically and clinically heterogeneous subgroup of vision disorders with over 270 different causative genes identified so far [1]. Many IRDs are characterised by progressive loss of photoreceptors or the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) that can lead to severe visual impairment. While significant progress has been made to date, the majority of these blinding diseases remains untreatable.
With the notable example of the FDA approval of a gene augmentation therapy for RPE65-associated IRD, recent success in the field of gene augmentation therapies is largely driven by preclinical studies performed in animal models [2,3,4]. Despite their advantages, such as low cost and ease of genetic manipulation, each animal model also has disadvantages; for example, differences in retinal anatomy, photoreceptor types, or genomic conservation compared to a human, alongside ethical restrictions [5].
In vitro models are becoming an increasingly popular addition to animal models [6]. For example, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) derived from somatic cells of an individual can be genetically reprogrammed to become pluripotent, meaning that they can differentiate into any other adult cell type [7]. Differentiated cells that are generated from these iPSCs contain the unique genome of the individual and, therefore, have the exact genetic and cellular context to study disease mechanisms of hereditary disorders. In the case of photoreceptor-based IRDs, photoreceptors in iPSC-derived retinal organoids will recapitulate many of the pathophysiological processes, both at the cellular and molecular levels that underlie the disease in the respective IRD patients.
The retina is a light-sensitive neural tissue situated at the back of the eye that displays a laminated appearance upon transverse sectioning and light microscopy. At the most posterior part resides the layer of RPE. The basal surfaces of the RPE cells face the choroidal blood vessels, whereas their apical processes interdigitate with photoreceptors. The specialised light-sensing photoreceptor outer segments (OS) form the next layer and are connected to their adjacent biosynthetic inner segments by the connecting cilium. The outer limiting membrane (OLM), a barrier to movement in the extracellular space formed by the photoreceptor and Müller cell end-feet, separates the inner segments from a layer containing the nuclei of rod and cone photoreceptors, called the outer nuclear layer (ONL), whereas photoreceptor axons and processes meet with horizontal and bipolar cells in the outer plexiform layer (OPL). More anterior, the inner nuclear layer (INL) harbours nuclei of the bipolar, amacrine, horizontal, and Müller cells, while the inner plexiform layer (IPL) contains the processes and synapses of bipolar and amacrine with retinal ganglion cells (RGC). The nuclei of RGCs form the RGC layer while their axons form the optic nerve fibre layer. The most anterior layer is populated by astrocytes that form an inner limiting membrane (ILM), separating the retina from the vitreous [8]. During the early embryonic development of the foetal eye, the retina is formed from neuro-ectoderm, the outermost embryonic germ layer. The ectoderm forms two optic vesicles, the distal portion of which folds inward to form the optic cups. The outer and inner walls of an optic cup generate RPE and retina, respectively [9].
Retinal organoid differentiation resembles the formation of the optic vesicle. After a prolonged culture using state-of-the-art protocols, retinal organoids can contain most of the retinal neuronal cell types such as rods and cones, ganglion, bipolar, horizontal, amacrine, and Müller cells, as well as, mimicking the lamination of the retina with most of the photoreceptor nuclei placed in the ONL, with infrequent misplaced cones appearing in the INL (Fig. 1) [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17].
Three differentiation stages of a retinal organoid can be described (Fig. 2). At stage 1, around differentiation day (D) 30 to 50, organoids develop a clear phase-bright outer neuroepithelial rim that contains neural retina progenitors and the inner part of the organoid harbours RGCs. RGCs are the first retinal cells to differentiate at around D50, but their numbers decrease from D90 onwards, seemingly due to the lack of connection to brain targets [11, 17]. A recent paper showed that in assembloid culture, where retinal and brain organoids were fused at D50, RGCs exhibited axonal outgrowth and pathfinding into the cortical neurons of brain organoids, alongside increased proliferation and decreased cell death at D150 [18]. At stage 2, around D80-D120, organoids develop a phase-dark core with a reduced bright rim and early progenitors of cones and rods begin to appear. At stage 3, around D120-180, the outer rim is more visible with hair-like, or brush-border-like structures that correspond to the photoreceptor inner and outer segments [10]. The differentiating retinal organoid expresses a specific set of biomarkers at each maturation stage; for example, photoreceptors express field transcription factor PAX6, and retinal progenitor cell factor VSX2 early in differentiation, followed by a photoreceptor precursor-specific transcription factor CRX, early rod-specific marker NRL, and the mature cone and rod markers recoverin, and L/M/S-opsins and rhodopsin, respectively. Photoreceptor cilium and OS formation during retinal development can be tracked by staining of the PCARE protein from D120-180 [19]. A dark patch of RPE cells is frequently observed as part of the developing neural-retinal vesicle, but not as a monolayer overlying the neural retina. The retinal organoid cell populations are considered to be fully developed between D210 and D260, and decrease in complexity from there on [10, 11].
Methods of retinal organoid differentiation
Important advances have been made in the development of protocols that are used to differentiate stem cells into retinal cells, improving the formation of well-defined retinal cell types and structures, as well as the efficiency and reproducibility (Table 1).
One of the earliest successful differentiation methods used adherent (2D) cultures to direct embryonic stem cells into an anterior neural fate. Adding Wnt/BMP signalling inhibitors alongside IGF-1 to the media, induced the formation of photoreceptor-marker positive cells, but these were not the main cell types in the adherent culture [20]. Inhibition of Notch signalling with DAPT treatment significantly increased the proportion of photoreceptor and RPE cells, and the addition of the rod-genesis factors retinoic acid (RA) and taurine boosted the number of photoreceptor-marker positive cells [21]. Neural induction media with heparin and chemically defined N2 supplement nudged iPSC to aggregate into embryoid bodies, which then adhered to the surface of the coated culture dish and differentiated towards neural retina [22]. However, the number of photoreceptors obtained under these conditions was low, these photoreceptors were mainly precursor cells, and were distributed in a monolayer of mixed cultures.
A key step to obtain stratified neural retinas was the transition to non-adherent (3D) protocols. Mouse embryonic stem cell (ESC) aggregates cultured in suspension under low-growth factor conditions together with Matrigel matrix improved the formation of optic cups mimicking the embryonic optic cup with apical-basal polarities [23]. The addition of foetal bovine serum (FBS) and the hedgehog agonist SAG augmented retinal differentiation for human stem cells with laminated retinas, expressing markers of all retinal cell types: ganglion, amacrine, bipolar, horizontal, Müller, and photoreceptor cells. In human ESC-derived retinal organoids, electron microscopy (EM) analysis of the photoreceptor cell layer showed mitochondria and rudimentary connecting cilia with basal bodies, only lacking obvious OS [24].
A combination of 3D and 2D protocols that did not require the addition of small molecules differentiated iPSCs to mature and light-responsive photoreceptor cells with rudimentary OS. This was achieved by reducing the RA concentration between D50 and D70, and prolonging the culturing times [17]. Alternatively, a 2D to 3D approach enabled the bypass of embryoid body formation, generating neuroretinal structures in the adherent culture that were excised and further cultured in suspension [25]. These floating neuroretinas formed neural rosettes containing photoreceptors, but without the characteristic lamination of other 3D cultures. Incorporation of the differentiating retinal factors—serum, RA, taurine, and the supplements N2 and B27—permitted generation of photoreceptors with rudimentary OS visible at the edges of the retinal organoid [26]. Interestingly, a different procedure to the 2D and 3D models generated neuroretinas with mature photoreceptors following spontaneous attachment and spreading of epithelial structures, called cysts [27].
Most of these protocols share common media components, but a switch in the timing and addition of certain molecules helped to improve the yield of neuroretinal vesicles obtained. Bone morphogenetic proteins play a role in establishing dorsal/ventral patterning of the retina [28], and specifically, BMP4 is needed for retina specification in mice [29]. The addition of timed BMP4 treatment was shown to increase the self-formation of neuroretinal epithelia [10, 30]. The factor IGF-1 also facilitated the formation of 3D-laminated retinal organoids when added to the media during the first 3 months of differentiation [31, 32]. Nevertheless, this response to BMP4 and IGF-1 activation is iPSC line- and differentiation method-dependent [33]. Addition of 9-cis retinal, instead of the widely used all-trans RA, accelerated rod photoreceptor differentiation in organoid cultures, with higher rhodopsin expression and more mature mitochondrial morphology evident by D120 [34]. For cone specification, thyroid hormone signalling regulation helped to control the fate of cone subtypes in retinal organoids [12]. RGCs usually appear at D40 to D50 after the start of differentiation. Accelerated ganglion cell development within D28 of differentiation was achieved by encapsulating EBs in a 3D Matrigel drop instead of growing in suspension [35].
Current applications for retinal organoids
Retinal organoid technology offers the possibility to obtain retinal tissue for a wide range of applications and research questions. To illustrate, here we highlight the potential of retinal organoids for therapeutic transplantation and as a model to assess therapeutic strategies.
Retinal organoids as a source for transplantation
Photoreceptors are often the first cell type lost in many retinal diseases. When that occurs and the adjacent retinal layers remain intact, transplantation of healthy photoreceptors could be a potential treatment option. Photoreceptors derived from human stem cells are an exceptional and unlimited source of human cells for transplantation. Transplanted photoreceptors were first thought to integrate into the ONL of degenerating retina and improve vision in mouse models [36, 37]. However, recent studies have demonstrated that transplanted photoreceptors do not integrate; instead, they remain in the subretinal space and exchange cytoplasmic material with the host cells [38,39,40,41]. In light of this discovery, earlier publications should be interpreted with caution and new carefully designed studies are required to clarify if integration or material transfer are mediating the observed effects.
Transplanted embryonic stem cell-derived photoreceptors from 2D cultures into adult Crx−/− mice retinas were able to produce ERG responses [42]; however, the photoreceptors used in this study did not mature to form OS. The advent of 3D protocols to generate retinal organoids [17, 23, 24] offered the opportunity to obtain a better yield and reproducibility of photoreceptors. For example, transplantation of mouse ESCs-derived photoreceptors by subretinal injection into Gnat−/− mice displayed features of mature photoreceptors, such as inner and outer segments. When transplanted to Rho−/− and Prph2−/− mutants, the donor cells showed rhodopsin and PRPH2 positivity that were lacking in the endogenous retinas, although they did not contain OS [43]. Transplantation of cones purified from retinal organoids into adult Nrl−/− mice, a model where rod cells take a different fate and become S-cones [44] was reported to be successful [26]. Donor L/M cones were well oriented in the ONL and expressed markers of the mature cell type. In adult an LCA4 model, Aipl1−/− mice that lack photoreceptors transplanted L/M cones expressed the presynaptic protein ribeye and photopigments. However, the functionality of these cells was not assessed [45].
The source and developmental stage of transplanted cells, as well as their enrichment and delivery methods, are key to successful transplantation. The body of photoreceptor precursor cell isolation and transplantation work suggests that fully mature photoreceptors may be more fragile and unfit for transplantation than retinal progenitor cells. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of the progenitor cell marker C-kit, a type III receptor tyrosine kinase, and the pluripotency marker SSEA4, can be used to isolate retinal progenitor cells without tumorigenic components [46, 47]. C-Kit+/SSEA4− cells possess the characteristics of retinal progenitors and in rd1 mice, organoid-derived C-kit+/SSEA4−-transplanted cells protected the ONL and improved visual function. The photoreceptor-specific cell surface markers CD24 and CD73 can also be used to isolate photoreceptors [48, 49]. Label-free techniques of photoreceptor selection that comply with current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) are preferred for clinical translation. Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) based on CD73 expression allows for enrichment of rod photoreceptor precursors [50]. Photoreceptors from retinal organoids can also be isolated using a panel of biomarkers [51]. Microfluidic enrichment of photoreceptor precursor cells is a more recent approach that allows to separate RPE cells from the rest of retinal cells based on their mechanical and physical properties. The device was also able to separate some rods from cones, although further improvements will be needed to filter bipolar and ganglion cells [52]. Depending on the disease, the stage of the disease, and the cell type to be transplanted, different delivery methods need to be considered. Trans-scleral and transvitreal injection are effective methods to deliver retinal cells into the eye, with the transvitreal approaches preferred in the clinic [53]. Integration and survival of photoreceptor cells in suspension is limited compared to the more successful transplant of RPE cells [41, 54, 55].
Transplantation of retinal sheets is an alternative to single-cell suspension transplants. Transplanted mouse iPSCs-derived retinal sheets can survive in the subretinal space of rd1 mice and form synaptic connections with the host retina [56]. The hESC-derived retina can mature and form an ONL with photoreceptor inner and outer segments after transplantation in monkeys and nude rats [57]. The same group demonstrated that the transplanted cells were able to respond to light [58]. Transplanted sheets formed neural rosettes and improved visual function in the host retina of immunodeficient RhoS334ter−3 rats, a model of severe retinal degeneration [59]. hESC-derived D60-D70 full retinal organoids implanted into the subretinal space of immunosuppressed wild-type cats integrated and formed cytoplasmic and synaptic interactions with the host tissue [60]. Transplantation of iPSCs-derived retinas formed rosettes bearing photoreceptors with OS, bipolar, and amacrine cells, but no RGCs. Grafted cells formed synapses with the host bipolar cells and generated light-responses. These cells survived after 5 months in rats, and over 2 years in monkeys, demonstrating the long-term potential of this therapeutic approach [61].
Other physical factors may play an important role in transplantation. The OLM is made of cadherin–catenin complexes that mediate cell–cell adhesion and serves as a barrier for the integration of transplanted photoreceptor precursor cells [62]. Disruption of OLM proteins enhanced integration of transplanted photoreceptors [63]. Gliosis caused by reactive Müller cells might be considered as well in the context of transplantation and OLM as a barrier [64].
Despite these advances and the availability of well-characterised GMP-compliant retinal cells via stem cell differentiation, there are still many challenges to be overcome to achieve the level of successful transplantation that is needed to restore high acuity vision.
Retinal organoids to assess therapeutic strategies
Therapies based on adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors are gaining momentum as a potential treatment for retinal diseases. One major reason is the accessibility of the eye, which makes it suitable for intravitreal or subretinal injection surgery. AAVs can infect human cells, allowing long-term expression of the transgene after a single dose.
There are several known AAV serotypes [65], with different tropisms for the tissue they can infect. AAV serotype 2 has been widely used in the eye [66]. Human retinal organoids offer an opportunity to investigate viral tropism and transduction in tissue that resembles the human retina. The first evaluation of different AAV serotypes in retinal organoids showed that AAV2/8 and ShH10 (an AAV6 variant) [67] were the most robust to transduce photoreceptors in this system, with higher efficiency of the latter [68]. The promoter rhodopsin kinase was able to drive expression in both rod and cone photoreceptors, while the opsin 2.1 promoter was active in L/M-cones and some S-cones [68]. The AAV serotype AAV2-7m8 in combination with opsin 1.7 promoter was effective in the transduction of L/M-cones [69]. Compared to AAV2, AAV9, and AAV8, AAV2-7m8 demonstrated higher tropism for photoreceptor precursor cells at D44 of differentiation and remained stable for at least 4 weeks [70]. AAV2/5 under the CAG promoter transduced photoreceptors with high efficiency (~ 90%) and was used to rescue RP2 expression in RP2-KO retinal organoids, improving photoreceptor survival [71]. On the retina-on-chip model, the AAV2-7m8 variant was also more efficient at transducing mature photoreceptors, Müller, and ganglion cells, compared to first-generation AAV variants [72]. The newly generated recombinant AAV vectors AAV2.NN and AAV2.GL outperform AAV2 and AAV2-7m8 in mice and are able to effectively transduce human retinal explants [73]. In organoids, the variant AAV2.GL had a comparable transduction efficiency to AAV2-7m8, while AAV2.NN had higher fluorescence levels than all other AAV variants tested [72]. The NN peptide-insert also showed high transduction efficiency of organoids when used in the AAV9 vector [74].
Delivery of AAV by intravitreal injections is a safe method, but it often leads to low transduction efficiencies of photoreceptors. A novel injection system using peripapillary intravitreal injection promises to be a safe and efficient alternative to standard intravitreal injections [75]. This, together with recent positive results on retinal-transduction efficiency of newly designed second-generation AAVs, holds hope for the future of AAV-based retinal therapies when combined with intravitreal delivery.
Another type of therapeutic strategies are RNA-based therapies, such as antisense oligonucleotides (AONs), which are becoming popular to treat IRD [76, 77]. AONs are relatively small nucleic acid molecules that target the pre-mRNA or mRNA to modify the splicing process, alter translation or degrade a transcript. Currently, four clinical trials using these molecules are ongoing for CEP290- (NCT03913130 and NCT03913143), USH2A- (NCT03780257), and RHO- (NCT04123626) associated IRD. Retinal organoids have been instrumental to evaluate the efficacy and safety of several AON molecules that modulate splicing to either correct defects introduced by deep-intronic variants in CEP290 [78, 79] and ABCA4 [80] or to create shorter proteins with a residual function in USH2A [81]. This implementation of retinal organoids will be further discussed in “Splicing studies” section.
Analyses of retinal organoids
The advent of new analytical methods that include and integrate multiple next-generation “omics” technologies is on par with the progress of organoid technology (Fig. 3). This facilitates the extraction of useful information from organoids, or a subpopulation of cells, at different levels of complexity and detail.
Genome analysis
The epigenetic landscape and intragenic/intergenic variants play an important role in regulating gene expression. One such epigenetic feature is a 3D organization of chromatin in the nucleus. The chromatin organization can be examined at a high spatial resolution, using methods such as chromosome conformation capture (3C) assays. In these assays, first the chromatin-deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) complexes in the nucleus are crosslinked with formaldehyde. Then, the tissue is fragmented, and the DNA is extracted, ligated, and digested with restriction enzymes. Interacting loci are amplified with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and quantified by sequencing methods [82, 83]. A high-throughput assay called Hi-C allows mapping of chromatin interaction genome-wide in the tissue of interest, in this case, the retina for IRD. For example, the so-called low-input Hi-C analysis of retinal organoids was used to develop the first topologically associated domain (TAD) structure from the human retina and then examine the consequences of an IRD-associated structural variant. This analysis revealed a disrupted chromatin organization with repositioning of domain boundaries, formation of a neo-TAD, and consequent misexpression of GDPD1 in the RP17 locus of patients with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (RP) [84]. The low input Hi-C method allows for low amounts of input material and thus mitigates one of the largest hurdles of the retinal organoid system [82], suggesting it could be used to study other IRDs with a genomic reorganisation.
Another promising application of retinal organoids for epigenetic analysis might be chromatin accessibility assay via the transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing (ATACseq). ATACseq can identify regions of open chromatin and cell-specific transcription factors binding sites via the action of hyperactive Tn5 transposase and high-throughput deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequencing [85]. It was previously implemented in patient-derived RPE cells to reveal decreased chromatin accessibility in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is the most common cause of central vision loss in the elderly [86, 87].
The small size and heterogeneity of cell types in retinal organoids pose significant technical challenges for techniques with higher material demand, lower sensitivity, or difficulty to distinguish between the signal coming from different cell types; this is also true for epigenetic analyses. However, for a disease where a primary tissue is difficult to obtain, such as in IRDs, organoids provide a unique opportunity to study the epigenetic landscape of a specific patient genome in the correct cellular context.
Transcriptome analysis
The retinal organoid system can also be used to quantify the changes in expression levels of retina-specific genes between a patient, or gene-edited line, and control, or following a therapeutic intervention. For this, ribonucleic acid (RNA) is converted into single-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) using a retroviral enzyme, reverse transcriptase with either oligo-dT for priming from the poly-A tails or random hexamers. The cDNA is used as a template for amplification of the gene of interest with PCR [88]. The resulting amplicon is then visualised with an agarose gel electrophoresis in reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR), or fluorescence can be incorporated for detection of amplicons during the early exponential phase of the PCR, in so-called quantitative PCR (qPCR) [89]. Pioneering studies used the qPCR technique to show that the temporal profile of neural retinal markers expression of mouse ES-derived organoids follows that of the retina in vivo [23]. qPCR is sensitive even for low abundant genes and requires little starting material; therefore, it remains widely used for gene expression analysis in retinal organoids. To detect targets with a very low abundance, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) can be employed, which is a water–oil emulsion droplet-based method where a sample is split into droplets, and PCR amplification occurs in each individual droplet. This technique was used to quantify the correction of the aberrant splicing in retinal organoids derived from a Leber congenital amaurosis 10 (LCA10) patient post AON treatment [79].
Retinal development mapping
A snapshot of all RNA transcripts can be identified with microarrays or RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Microarray analysis utilises a collection of specifically designed short DNA oligos, which gives a quantifiable fluorescent signal upon hybridization with a cDNA from retinal organoids. With microarray analysis, the rhodopsin-positive cells of D26 and D34 ESC-derived organoids were compared to P12 early postnatal mouse photoreceptors, revealing that D34 were more mature and closer resembling P12 photoreceptors [43]. These arrays are cost-effective and require a small amount of sample material [90].
The array technique allows for transcriptome-wide gene expression profiling, including the ability to detect alternative splicing events, whereas RNA-seq allows for the identification of a larger number of genes than microarrays and is also applicable to unknown transcripts [91]. Here, the cDNA fragments are used for construction of an RNA-seq library, which then is compared to a reference transcriptome after next-generation sequencing. Bulk RNA-seq profiling demonstrated a gradual and continuous increase of photoreceptor-specific genes in developing retinal organoids, with cone-specific markers expressed before rod-specific ones [92]. Also, cone cells were shown to exist at different stages of maturation within a single organoid [93]. RNA-seq was instrumental to confirm that genes related to visual perception, synaptogenesis, and phototransduction increase over time in developing retinal organoids, and their expression is similar to late foetal and adult retinal transcriptomes [34].
The averaged gene expression profiles resulting from the bulk RNA-seq analysis limit its applicability to the mixed cell populations that comprise a retinal organoid. The gene expression profiles of individual cells yielded by single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq), on the other hand, allow expression data to be refined to specific cell types [94]. ScRNA-seq profiling identified photoreceptor populations [95] and also distinguished between rods and cones [96] in mature retinal organoids. scRNA-seq of ten pooled organoids at D220 revealed four major groups of cells: rods, cones, Müller cells, and a mixed population of retinal neurons, including bipolar, retinal ganglion, and amacrine cells [97]. scRNA-seq data from 4 different maturation stages of retinal organoids and bulk RNA-seq of retinal tissue at 16 stages of human retinal development were compared to the mouse transcriptome and revealed species-specific differences of gene expression in specification of cone photoreceptors and horizontal interneurons and gene regulatory networks that pattern the macula [98]. The mature retinal organoid transcriptomes were closer to peripheral than to foveal adult human retina and contain the largest number of diverse cell types at D210-266, and those cell types appear in the following temporal order: ganglion cells, photoreceptor precursors, horizontal cells, amacrine cells, bipolar cells, and Müller cells [11]. Another study used scRNA-seq to show that retinal organoids are similar in cellular composition to the foetal retina at equivalent stages of development; however, differences in levels of gene expression and quality of lamination were observed. Interestingly, lamination was superior in dissected foetal retina that was cultured under the same conditions as retinal organoids for up to 5 months. The study also described a transition cell population that is situated between progenitor and differentiated cell populations [15]. Furthermore, retinal organoid scRNA-seq has been used to investigate the potential for CRISPR-based genome editing in the retina. Downregulation of genes associated with the homology-directed repair (HDR) pathway (that are crucial for accurate genome editing) after cell division was reported in both adult mouse and human retinas as well as retinal organoid datasets, whereas non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) pathways were still active, suggesting NHEJ or MMEJ are more likely to be successful than HDR [99]. Nevertheless, despite the power of scRNA-seq the method is continually developing and advances are still needed in read depth, length, and improved sensitivity for the in-depth understanding of gene expression at the single-cell level in organoids.
Isogenic controls
Several studies have compared the expression of a gene of interest in patient-derived organoids versus controls. Organoids derived from a patient with splicing factor-related RP showed differential expression of a number of genes related to ciliary structure and photoreceptor morphology [100]. RNA-seq analysis of patient-derived retinal organoids harbouring mutations in AIPL1, underlying severe inherited retinal dystrophy Leber congenital amaurosis type 4 (LCA4), unexpectedly showed no difference in gene expression of AIPL1 itself or that of other retinal specific genes, but it did of the cortical development gene NEUROD6 at D25, D60, D88, and D123; furthermore, in the patient-derived organoids, photoreceptors developed normally [101]. In contrast, scRNA-seq of organoids at D100 and D170 bearing a loss of NRL protein confirmed downregulation of rod-specific genes [14].
A gene expression profile of patient-derived retinal organoids can be compared with that of an isogenic control generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction, thereby reducing inter-individual variation and more precise control of phenotypes associated with a disease-causing mutation. For example, retinal organoids bearing an RP-causative mutation in RPGR showed upregulation of necrosis and inflammation receptors when compared to both isogenic and unrelated controls [102]. Similarly, in organoids with a mutation in X-linked juvenile retinoschisis causative gene RS1, the expression of RS1 alongside retinopathy-associated genes IQCB1 and OPA1 was reduced compared to isogenic control organoids [103]. Alternatively, an isogenic pair can be created by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knock-out in a healthy control iPSC line. A CRISPR-generated knock-out of both isoforms of the nuclear hormone receptor thyroid hormone receptor β (Thrβ2 and Thrβ1), but not the Thrβ2 alone, as was previously thought, directed the cone fate specification toward the S-opsin type [12]. The RP2 gene encodes for a GTPase-activating protein linked to a severe form of X-linked RP. Isogenic disruption of RP2 in retinal organoids shared expression profile similarities to patient-derived organoids, including upregulation of a number of pro-apoptotic genes compared to isogenic controls that correlated with photoreceptor cell loss [71].
Splicing studies
In the retinal organoid system, RT-PCR and RNA-seq can also enable mapping of developmental switches in splicing and give an insight into the retina-specific alternative splicing events, where several distinct mRNAs are produced from the same gene, leading to different isoforms. Photoreceptors have a high level of alternative splicing with many unique or enriched isoforms. The alternative splicing programme in photoreceptors is independent of Crx and it is driven, amongst others, by the protein Musashi-1, which promotes the inclusion of photoreceptor-specific exons [104, 105]. Alternative splicing can also be associated with pathogenic events. For example, the levels of aberrant splicing and pseudoexon inclusion associated with a deep-intronic variant in CEP290, which causes LCA10, were higher in patient-derived retinal organoids compared to RPE or other cell types [78]. Retinal organoids were used to show that AONs could correct the aberrant splicing in LCA10 [78, 79] and this approach shows promise in a clinical trial [106].
Mutations can also occur in retinal specific exons; for example, RT-PCR of control retinal organoids showed an increase in expression of the alternatively spliced isoform REEP6.1, which harboured a mutation in a family with autosomal recessive RP, correlated with the time course of photoreceptor development [107]. Similarly, expression of a retinal isoform of the ciliopathy and RP-linked gene DYNC2H1 increased in maturing retinal organoids over time to become the dominant transcript at D200, correlating with the non-syndromic RP in patients with mutations affecting the retinal isoform only [108]. In Stargardt disease, an ABCA4-associated progressive disorder of the retina that is initially characterised by a loss of central vision, retinal organoids exhibited enhanced splicing defects, such as pseudoexon insertion caused by deep-intronic variants, compared to transfection of gene constructs in non-retinal cells, and were used to show the therapeutic potential of an AON for splice correction [80]. RNA-seq analysis of PRPF31 patient organoids revealed changes in alternative splicing of key components involved in the splicing process, as well as part of the microtubule and ciliary networks [100]. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of a PRPF31 mutation in retinal organoids and RPE rescued these molecular and cellular defects [100].
To conclude, transcriptome analysis via the RNA-seq method has become a pivotal tool in the analysis of retinal organoid development and disease mechanisms. The disadvantage of RNA-seq is the difficulty in reconstructing full-length transcripts from the assembly of reads, particularly when alternative splicing into highly similar isoforms occurs. Long-read sequencing provides amplification-free, single-molecule sequencing of cDNAs and eliminates the need for the library assembly step, and thus can be more sensitive for the alternative splicing events in distinct cell populations of the retinal organoid [109, 110]. Other limitations of RNA sequencing techniques include sensitivity to the number of reads and underrepresentation of the reads from short and low abundant genes. In addition, a high cost along with a variety of protocols and analysis methods might make RNA-seq techniques challenging to implement.
Proteomic analysis
An increase in RNA transcript numbers does not necessarily lead to an increase in the amount of the encoded protein. RNA or protein stability and post-translational modifications also contribute to protein levels [111, 112]. Western blotting (WB) is an electrophoresis-based protein detection technique that utilises a polyacrylamide gel matrix for size separation of proteins followed by staining of immobilised antigens on immunoblots by using highly specific antibodies [113]. Several studies employed WB to demonstrate a presence of an additional version of a protein, such as TRNT1 [114], decrease of protein expression, such a RS1 [103], and AIPL1 [101] in patient-derived retinal organoids versus control, or rescue of protein expression after treatment [78, 115].
Due to the small size of the laminated retinal organoid, it is challenging to obtain sufficient material for WB analysis. Although one study reports pooling together at least 16 stage-1 (D18-D35) organoids per condition [116], this approach might be even more challenging for later stage organoids due to their small yield, and time- and labour-intensive differentiation protocols to produce sufficient material for robust replicates. A reverse-phase proteomic array (RPPA) that requires nanogram-range amounts of proteins could be implemented to study retinal organoids. In this technique, protein extracts are printed onto nitrocellulose-covered microscope slides and then quantified using antibodies [117].
A more exploratory technique, mass spectrometry (MS) analysis can identify and quantify multiple proteins in complex mixtures by measuring the mass-to-charge ratio of peptides that are labelled with isotopes [118, 119]. For example, MS suggested a role of differential splicing to be more significant in RPE than in organoids [100]. However, the sensitivity of the MS might be lower in retinal organoids due to its cell population heterogeneity.
Metabolomic analysis
Metabolomics is another -omics approach that allows sensitive and semi-quantitative detection of low molecular weight molecules at a given time. The “metabolome” can rapidly change and reflect the dynamics of a biological system [120]. While metabolomic studies are not very frequent in the area of ophthalmology (recently reviewed in [121] and [122]), they are well-implemented tools for new-born screening and diagnosis of many multisystemic diseases and currently being further developed to find new disease indicators and biomarkers that allow following the progression of a disease or the effect of therapeutic intervention [120]. Using small intestine and pancreas organoids, a study concluded that the organoid system does not recapitulate the full functional metabolomic spectrum of the organ and suggested improvements in the cultivation process [123]. However, the progress in intestinal development has allowed performing metabolic studies in a more robust and reliable manner [124,125,126]. Unfortunately, this type of study has not yet been fully explored in the retinal organoid field, as shown by the limited literature available.
Imaging techniques, such as hyperspectral imaging (HSpec), can be used to assess the metabolic activity of the organoids. HSpec showed that retinol and RA signal intensity increased following an increase in CRX expression. The metabolic state can also be imaged with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) that shows glycolytic activity by measuring free and bound NADH distribution. In D150 organoids, the glycolytic region appeared in the laminated outer edge that corresponds to the emergence of a highly metabolically active photoreceptor layer [127]. Recently, a dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography (D-FFOCT) was developed where backscattering from cell dynamics or metabolic activity resulted in higher resolution compared to conventional OCT. This technique could distinguish between RPE and photoreceptor progenitor populations in early-stage organoids [128]. These techniques show promise for the non-invasive determination of the retinal organoid maturation stage; however, it will be important to fully correlate the analysis results with the large array of cell type markers via widely-established immunohistochemical methods.
Interestingly, for retinal organoids, an easy and renewable source of material is the culture medium. Many factors are released to the medium, and they could provide valuable information about the stage of the organoids and the active functions. Furthermore, the used medium is usually discarded and thus the metabolomic studies throughout the complete retinal organoid differentiation could be established. For example, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system coupled to MS allowed the analysis of the media content of retinal organoids treated with retinotoxic antibiotic moxifloxacin [129]. Another possibility could be to study the complement system in AMD organoids. In a recent study, the authors performed a quantitative multiplex profiling of all complement components to diagnose disease [130]. Thus, analysing the secretome of AMD organoids using the medium, could provide a correlation with the disease to what has been observed in human biofluids. An alternative targeted method for a specific group of biomarkers could be an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). This immunoassay can quantitatively measure a marker of interest; however, well-validated and robust antibodies need to be used to ensure reliable measurements [131]. ELISA could be useful to assess the levels of specific components of the complement pathway, as demonstrated recently by a study in plasma of AMD patients [132, 133]. However, the composition of the medium might interfere with the results. For example, if the aim is to study the metabolism of specific amino acid, sugar, protein, or a growth factor if it is already included in the culture medium, it may mask the possible effect. Altogether, exhaustive development might be needed to apply metabolomics as a regular -omics strategy for retinal organoids.
Lipidomic analysis
Lipidomics is another -omics strategy based on measuring the different types of lipids by combining extraction protocols with detection methods such as liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. In the past, lipids in the retina of multiple species have been exhaustively studied [134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141]. Depositions of lipids are found in patients suffering from AMD (drusen) or Stargardt disease (lipofuscin). Furthermore, several IRD-linked genes have been associated with lipid metabolism, such as ELOVL4 and CERKL. In addition, sphingolipidosis, such as Gaucher disease, or complex lipid disorders like Sjögren-Larsson syndrome, also present a retinal phenotype. Thus, lipidomics is a very appealing approach to study the mechanism of disease in cellular models. Retinal organoids can be used to study how changes in lipid metabolism affect retinal health; for example, deoxysphinganine-induced photoreceptor apoptosis in retinal organoids, supporting the potential association of serine and lipid metabolism disruption in macular telangiectasia type 2 [142].
Morphological analysis
Most studies of retinal organoids rely on immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a gold standard for characterisation of differentiation and identification of protein and cellular changes [143]. This microscopy-based technique visualises protein expression and localization by antibody staining. First, a cross-linking fixative, such as paraformaldehyde, is used to preserve the cellular architecture and to immobilise target antigens. The fixation agent can degrade or mask an antigen or epitope of interest; therefore, the optimal fixation and staining conditions should be experimentally determined for each antigen–antibody combination separately. Subsequently, the organoids are cryopreserved with sucrose or similar substance, then embedded in suitable media such as OCT, frozen, and sectioned to obtain thin slices that are eventually subjected to antibody staining. Perpendicular sectioning and careful positioning of the organoids is required to capture the photoreceptors in the correct orientation. A list of commonly used antibodies is provided in Table 2.
IHC can also be adapted for quantitative analysis; for example, the survival of cells in ONL in retinal organoids can be measured, either as cell counts or ONL thickness. This method was used to show photoreceptor degeneration in the ONL of retinal organoids derived from a patient with a mutation in RP2 and CRISPR-mediated RP2 knock-out. The cell death also coincided with an increase in apoptotic cells visualised by a TUNEL assay where the 3′ ends of the fragmented DNA are labelled with fluorescently tagged dUTP nucleotides. Significantly more TUNEL-positive cells were present in the ONL at D150 in the patient and knock-out organoids compared to the control which pinpointed a peak in photoreceptor cell death, with subsequent thinning of the ONL, by D180 [71].
While severe photoreceptor layer abnormalities or large cysts are visible under bright field microscopy [103], this technique cannot resolve deep into the tissue. Similarly, the IHC method requires sectioning of the organoid, which proves challenging when the intricate 3D structure and interplay between cell layers are of interest. Multi-photon microscopy improves the image quality deeper into the tissue without the need for sectioning. It confines the emitted fluorescence to a small area by combining the multiple low-energy excitation photons precisely in time and space [145]. The use of multi-photon microscopy allows for live imaging of the invagination process in the forming retinal organoid [23], revealed an interkinetic nuclear migration of retinal progenitors in the D20 optic-vesicle epithelium [24], and showed the differences in M/L-opsin and the rhodopsin marker distribution on the surface of mature organoids [10]. Another method of in-depth imaging, light-sheet fluorescence microscopy, illuminates the sample perpendicular to the objective lens with a thin sheet of excitation light, ensuring that the emitted signal arises only from the in-focus regions [146]. Light-sheet fluorescence microscopy helped visualise the ribbon synapse network formed by photoreceptors and bipolar cells alongside the morphology of photoreceptor basal body and inner segments [147]. A major limitation of the multiphoton imaging of live organoids over longer periods of time is the photodamage to the tissue caused by the excitation light and the need for intrinsic fluorescent markers, potentially necessitating the production of reporter cell lines.
A technique called optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows non-invasive imaging in the eye in vivo and can also be applied to organoids to reveal the internal organisation via the difference in light wave reflectance between nuclear and plexiform layers. An appearance of a layer with high reflectance was reported at D150 near the outer laminated edge of the organoid [127] while another group observed the appearance of alternating high and low reflectance layers at approximately the same stage [10].
The depth of imaging with the multiphoton technique is limited by the penetration of the excitation. Clearing is a chemical treatment that equalises the reflection indexes of the cell membranes and cytoplasm, thus minimizing light scattering, and allows light to travel through a thicker tissue while preserving its excitation and emission efficiency. PACT (passive clarity technique) clearing requires organoids to be fixed with paraformaldehyde, and embedded into hydrogel monomer, after which the resulted hydrogel-organoid hybrid is cleared from the membrane’s lipids [147, 148]. Alternatively, during the 3DISCO (3D imaging of solvent-cleared organs) procedure, the tissue is dehydrated with increasing concentrations of tetrahydrofuran and then impregnated with optical clearing agent dibenzyl ether [149]. The former technique enabled imaging of whole mature organoids at D195 with recoverin, rhodopsin, and cone arrestin staining [150]. During the clearing procedures, the tissue is dehydrated or impregnated with a chemical agent. This can cause a heterogeneous tissue expansion or shrinkage, which might disturb tissue organization. However, a homogeneous tissue expansion of the organoid has the potential to provide a higher resolution imaging of some organelles through expansion microscopy. Second, the stringent chemical treatment might disturb specific antigens on the cleared tissue, limiting the number of useful antibodies. Furthermore, intact organoid clearing requires one specimen per stain which is demanding on production and replicates.
Some potential future applications, such as high throughput testing of drugs or gene therapies, demand an increase in the analysis speed and screening capacity. With an estimated capacity of 200,000 samples per day, a 3D automated reporter quantification (3D-ARQ) platform combines a microplate reader and an excitation/emission detection for the quantitative screening of retinal organoids stained with fluorescent dyes, for example Calcein AM dye that accumulates in the cytoplasm of live cells and is used in viability assays, or JC-1 that allows visualization of the mitochondria rich inner segments of photoreceptors [151].
Often, the subcellular structures of the organoids are of interest, for example, the organization of the membranes inside the OS of photoreceptors, or the structure of the cilium. Light microscopy cannot resolve subcellular structures due to the limited resolving power, whereas transmission electron microscopy (TEM) utilises electrons instead of light and can achieve resolution well below 1 nm. However, it requires elaborate sample preparation with the organoid section undergoing fixation, dehydration, and resin embedding. Imaging with TEM revealed photoreceptor-characteristic organisation and structures, such as the mitochondria rich inner segment, connecting cilium, basal bodies, adherens junctions at the OLM, and microvilli along with membranous disks inside immature OS [10, 17, 26, 71, 78, 129, 152]. TEM imaging also showed the emergence of a ribbon synapse between photoreceptors and bipolar cells in the inner plexiform layer which suggests the functional maturation of retinal organoids [10, 16, 26, 153]. Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) can be used to study the same regions of cells by both light microscopy and TEM and has been used to study retinal organoids to provide ultrastructural information, as well as antigen localisation by immuno-EM [154]. Overall, microscopy is a widely used technique for retinal organoid analysis as it provides an insight into their morphological, molecular, and, to some extent, functional properties.
Functional analysis
Light responsiveness and synaptic transmission are two crucial features of the functional maturation of photoreceptors and the retina. The light response of a cell can be accessed by measuring a change in its ionic currents in response to light using a patch-clamp. With the patch-clamp, the glass micropipette filled with an electrolytic solution serves as a recording electrode. The electrode touches the membrane of the cell and the suction is applied to establish a tight contact between the pipette and the membrane. This forces the flow of ionic current across the sealed patch of the cell membrane to enter the pipette [155, 156]. Photoreceptor cells may also be stimulated by chemicals, such as cGMP, a secondary messenger in the phototransduction cascade, that potentially mimics the dark current, non-excited state of photoreceptors [157]. In early development, the neurotransmitter GABA is depolarizing and later in development becomes inhibitory; thus the response to it indicates emerging of a functional neuronal network [158]. The patch-clamp recording of recoverin-positive cells in D100 organoids, recorded elevated resting potential and current when compared to control cells, and also the outward current was suppressed with tetraethylammonium, signifying a current that is consistent with photoreceptor electrophysiology [159]. Another study showed that in single and pooled organoids at D150, the response to light, cGMP, and GABA stimulation of RGCs was similar to the developing retina. These experiments require the addition of 9 or 11-cis retinal, a chromophore essential for rhodopsin activity, which also serves as a control for the response being opsin-mediated [17]. The OS containing cells of retinal organoids were reported to be comparable to rods of mice retina before eye-opening in their membrane capacity, potential, and resistance recordings. A whole-cell recording of presumed photoreceptors seemed to exhibit detectable hyperpolarization-activated current and the current/voltage curve resembles that of rods [102]. Although the patch-clamp technique is limited by low experimental throughput, it has an important advantage of recording a photoreceptor-specific signal.
Another method to investigate the functionality of retinal organoids utlises confocal or multi-photon microscopy to measure changes in intracellular Ca2+ indicative of the inward dark current that is characteristic of photoreceptors. The fluorescent calcium dye Fura-2 allows for visualization of the increase Ca2+ influx in response to cGMP-analogue in cells of D45 and D90 [31], D175 [150], and in cell surface antigen CD73-positive photoreceptors of D190 retinal organoids [50]. In cells of retinal organoids that were genetically modified to express the fluorescent calcium sensor GCaMP6s, a change in Ca2+ influx in response to light stimulation was recorded in photoreceptors and in OFF bipolar cells but very few ON bipolar cells [11].
Two-photon microscopy has been combined with patch-clamp electrophysiological recordings to test membrane localization and functionality of optogenetic constructs in retinal organoids. Several types of light-sensitive microbial opsins were expressed in cells of the retinal organoids and excitatory photocurrents were observed for the depolarizing opsins alongside inhibitory photocurrents for the hyperpolarizing opsins [160].
Micro-electrode arrays (MEAs) contain multiple electrodes embedded into a ceramic or glass carrier [161]. Retinal organoids are placed with RGCs facing down onto the MEA and a light or chemical stimulus is applied, resulting in detectable voltage changes [162]. A stronger response to light was observed in control compared to AMD patient-derived organoids [129]. A comparison between the recording of D150 organoids derived control versus a patient with a mutation in PRPF31, causing the degeneration of the mid-peripheral retina, implied a significantly reduced response to GABA, but no changes in response to cGMP-analogue [100]. The advantage of the MEA technique is that it measures output from the RGCs which shows inner retinal connectivity; however, the MEA has the challenge of being reliant on the presence of both mature RGCs and photoreceptors at the same stage. This is challenging given the reduction in RGCs by the stage that photoreceptors have developed, as well as the necessity to preserve an inner retinal structure and OS while setting up the MEA. Furthermore, for the MEA, extra care should be taken with the experimental design to eliminate the other sources of electrical signal other than photoreceptors, unlike Ca2+ imaging or patch clamping where the origin of the response is more clearly identified.
An important potential addition to testing photoreceptor-driven responses would be to generate a disruption of the elements of the phototransduction pathway, such as by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-out, to confirm the source of the responses. While testing the light responsiveness of retinal organoids in vitro is a “holy grail” of organoid characterisation, there is still a lot of work to be done before it could be used as a routine and reproducible measure of photoreceptor function in disease or following rescue.
Limitations of retinal organoids as models of the in vivo retina
In the retina, the OS of cone and rod photoreceptors are specialised primary cilia that contain stacks of deep membrane folds of the plasma membrane, or double-membrane disks enclosed by the plasma membrane, respectively [8]. The structure of these disks is important for phototransduction, as they harbour light-sensitive opsins that are conjugated with the chromophore 11-cis-retinal. A major challenge in retinal organoid technology to study photoreceptor disease has been to produce properly stacked OS. Mature retinal organoids contain OS-like structures containing membranous disks that are loaded with opsins [154], but lack the correct disk stacking and orientation. Moreover, an extensive characterisation of the observed membranous structures remains to be done [17, 26, 27, 78, 150, 163]. Notwithstanding, retinal organoids can still be instrumental in studying disk and OS biogenesis [19].
OS membrane disks are renewed and shed daily [164, 165]. When shed, they are phagocyted by the RPE cells [166]. The RPE supports the high metabolic rate of the photoreceptors by allowing the flow of nutrients from the choroid [167] and participates in the visual cycle by creating ionic gradients and converting all-trans-retinal into 11-cis-retinal [168, 169]. During development, the RPE secretes compounds required for photoreceptor maturation [30, 170,171,172]. Retinal organoids usually contain RPE; however, they are generally juxtaposed to the photoreceptors in a clump, and not in a monolayer like the situation in vivo. Therefore, the challenge remains to generate an optic cup-like structure where RPE and retina co-exist in close proximity. A recently developed retina-on-a-chip microfluidic device reported such a co-culture by the embedding of the retinal organoid in hydrogel within a small distance of RPE for 7 days, but there was only a small region of contact between the three-dimensional organoids and the two-dimensional RPE [173].
Another structure yet to be replicated is the fovea, a substructure in the centre of the human retina that is required for high-acuity colour vision. The absence of rod photoreceptors and other retinal cell types in the foveal pit allows light to directly stimulate densely packed cones. The fovea is specific to human and non-human primates and is selectively affected by diseases such as macular degeneration. The fovea develops postnatally in the area of the retina where the development of rods from late retinal progenitor cells is inhibited, and the location of this area is likely to be determined by transcription factors involved in the definition of the axis of the retina [174]. While the spontaneous induction of the foveal pit might not be likely in the organoid, several studies reported the generation of cone-enriched organoids, possibly by removal of rod-favouring RA [97, 175, 176].
Blood vessel and immune-related cells are also missing from retinal organoids; these are derived from the mesoderm and during development migrate into the developing optic vesicles. The addition of these cells to retinal organoids would likely require assembloid type technology to bring together cells from different developmental lineages, which was pioneered in brain organoids [177]. Recently, a model of outer-blood-retinal barrier on-a-chip has been described combining RPE and endothelial cells in a microfluidic chamber [178].
Future outlook
The small size and inherent heterogeneity of cell types in retinal organoids pose significant technical challenges for the types of analysis with higher material demand, lower sensitivity, or difficulty to distinguish between the signal coming from different cell types. It is, however, important to realise the potential of the retinal organoids to reveal neuroretina-specific gene regulation, pathological processes, and therapeutic manipulation.
It would be desirable to increase the efficiency and reproducibility of organoid production and decrease the labour required for their production. To do so, first, it is important to understand the reasons for the innate heterogeneity between iPSC lines and why some lines generate organoids more efficiently than others. More reproducible organoid generation from a particular cell line can be achieved by a better understanding of epigenetic control of iPSC pluripotency [179], as well as the neurodevelopmental factors that are involved in neural patterning and cell fate decisions. To improve and accelerate differentiations, organoids may be grown in rotating-wall vessel bioreactors [153, 180]. Also, reduction of the required labour and level of manual skill is desirable. For this, scraping or checkerboard methods that bypass the manual dissection step to help increase the yield of NRVs obtained are potentially useful [181, 182]. One such example, the recently described AMASS (agarose microwell array seeding and scraping), combines a controlled number of cells seeding in a microwell array with a checkerboard scraping. With this method, more than 3000 organoids were obtained in a single well of a 6-well plate [11]. Culture conditions could also mimic physiological conditions better through assembloid methodologies, such as combining cultures of the tissues produced independently to improve cell cross-talk and implement the use of biomaterials for cellular support [177, 183]. Current state-of-the-art differentiation protocols span several months and up to a year, for a fully mature retinal organoid. Organoid or precursor freezing might help address this and facilitate collaborations across laboratories in the field [150]. Ideally, retinal organoids could be shipped at room temperature at any stage for at least 5 days and still maintain their biological activity and functionality [184]. The heterogeneity of the retinal organoid samples should also be considered regarding analyses that are focused on certain cell types. As retinal organoids are small, the cell type of interest might be underrepresented and the useful signal lost due to the noise in individual organoids. It can be enriched by manual dissection [185], by coupling MS with flow cytometry, or via fluorescent reporters [43, 50, 92]. In addition, another way of specific cell-type enrichment would be to minimise the material needed for some procedures by refining their specificity and the signal-to-noise ratio.
In conclusion, we now have a number of state-of-the-art techniques that can facilitate analysis of the retinal organoids at different levels of complexity to understand disease mechanisms and test potential therapies. An expansion of the analytical toolbox will increase the benefit of the retinal organoid model for teasing apart the molecular mechanism of genetic blinding diseases.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ray J, Zhang Q, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Pearce-Kelling SE, Anand V, Zeng Y, Maguire AM, Jacobson SG, Hauswirth WW, Bennett J (2001) Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness. Nat Genet 28:92–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0501-92
Bainbridge JW, Mehat MS, Sundaram V, Robbie SJ, Barker SE, Ripamonti C, Georgiadis A, Mowat FM, Beattie SG, Gardner PJ, Feathers KL, Luong VA, Yzer S, Balaggan K, Viswanathan A, de Ravel TJ, Casteels I, Holder GE, Tyler N, Fitzke FW, Weleber RG, Nardini M, Moore AT, Thompson DA, Petersen-Jones SM, Michaelides M, van den Born LI, Stockman A, Smith AJ, Rubin G, Ali RR (2015) Long-term effect of gene therapy on Leber’s congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med 372:1887–1897. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414221
Bennett J, Wellman J, Marshall KA, McCague S, Ashtari M, DiStefano-Pappas J, Elci OU, Chung DC, Sun J, Wright JF, Cross DR, Aravand P, Cyckowski LL, Bennicelli JL, Mingozzi F, Auricchio A, Pierce EA, Ruggiero J, Leroy BP, Simonelli F, High KA, Maguire AM (2016) Safety and durability of effect of contralateral-eye administration of AAV2 gene therapy in patients with childhood-onset blindness caused by RPE65 mutations: a follow-on phase 1 trial. The Lancet 388:661–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30371-3
Slijkerman RW, Song F, Astuti GD, Huynen MA, van Wijk E, Stieger K, Collin RW (2015) The pros and cons of vertebrate animal models for functional and therapeutic research on inherited retinal dystrophies. Prog Retin Eye Res 48:137–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2015.04.004
Lynn SA, Keeling E, Dewing JM, Johnston DA, Page A, Cree AJ, Tumbarello DA, Newman TA, Lotery AJ, Ratnayaka JA (2018) A convenient protocol for establishing a human cell culture model of the outer retina. F1000Research 7:1107–1107. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15409.1
Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S (2007) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
Sung CH, Chuang JZ (2010) The cell biology of vision. J Cell Biol 190:953–963. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201006020
Graw J (2010) Eye development. Curr Top Dev Biol 90:343–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0070-2153(10)90010-0
Capowski EE, Samimi K, Mayerl SJ, Phillips MJ, Pinilla I, Howden SE, Saha J, Jansen AD, Edwards KL, Jager LD, Barlow K, Valiauga R, Erlichman Z, Hagstrom A, Sinha D, Sluch VM, Chamling X, Zack DJ, Skala MC, Gamm DM (2019) Reproducibility and staging of 3D human retinal organoids across multiple pluripotent stem cell lines. Development. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.171686
Cowan CS, Renner M, De Gennaro M, Gross-Scherf B, Goldblum D, Hou Y, Munz M, Rodrigues TM, Krol J, Szikra T, Cuttat R, Waldt A, Papasaikas P, Diggelmann R, Patino-Alvarez CP, Galliker P, Spirig SE, Pavlinic D, Gerber-Hollbach N, Schuierer S, Srdanovic A, Balogh M, Panero R, Kusnyerik A, Szabo A, Stadler MB, Orgül S, Picelli S, Hasler PW, Hierlemann A, Scholl HPN, Roma G, Nigsch F, Roska B (2020) Cell types of the human retina and its organoids at single-cell resolution. Cell 182:1623-1640.e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.013
Eldred KC, Hadyniak SE, Hussey KA, Brenerman B, Zhang P-W, Chamling X, Sluch VM, Welsbie DS, Hattar S, Taylor J, Wahlin K, Zack DJ, Johnston RJ (2018) Thyroid hormone signaling specifies cone subtypes in human retinal organoids. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6348
Fligor CM, Langer KB, Sridhar A, Ren Y, Shields PK, Edler MC, Ohlemacher SK, Sluch VM, Zack DJ, Zhang C, Suter DM, Meyer JS (2018) Three-dimensional retinal organoids facilitate the investigation of retinal ganglion cell development, organization and neurite outgrowth from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 8:14520. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32871-8
Kallman A, Capowski EE, Wang J, Kaushik AM, Jansen AD, Edwards KL, Chen L, Berlinicke CA, Joseph Phillips M, Pierce EA, Qian J, Wang TH, Gamm DM, Zack DJ (2020) Investigating cone photoreceptor development using patient-derived NRL null retinal organoids. Commun Biol 3:82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0808-5
Sridhar A, Hoshino A, Finkbeiner CR, Chitsazan A, Dai L, Haugan AK, Eschenbacher KM, Jackson DL, Trapnell C, Bermingham-McDonogh O, Glass I, Reh TA (2020) Single-cell transcriptomic comparison of human fetal retina, hPSC-derived retinal organoids, and long-term retinal cultures. Cell Rep 30(1644–1659):e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.007
Wahlin KJ, Maruotti JA, Sripathi SR, Ball J, Angueyra JM, Kim C, Grebe R, Li W, Jones BW, Zack DJ (2017) Photoreceptor outer segment-like structures in long-term 3D retinas from human pluripotent stem cells. Sci Rep 7:766. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00774-9
Zhong X, Gutierrez C, Xue T, Hampton C, Vergara MN, Cao LH, Peters A, Park TS, Zambidis ET, Meyer JS, Gamm DM, Yau KW, Canto-Soler MV (2014) Generation of three-dimensional retinal tissue with functional photoreceptors from human iPSCs. Nat Commun 5:4047. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5047
Fligor CM, Lavekar SS, Harkin J, Shields PK, VanderWall KB, Huang K-C, Gomes C, Meyer JS (2021) Extension of retinofugal projections in an assembled model of human pluripotent stem cell-derived organoids. Stem Cell Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2021.05.009
Corral-Serrano JC, Lamers IJC, van Reeuwijk J, Duijkers L, Hoogendoorn ADM, Yildirim A, Argyrou N, Ruigrok RAA, Letteboer SJF, Butcher R, van Essen MD, Sakami S, van Beersum SEC, Palczewski K, Cheetham ME, Liu Q, Boldt K, Wolfrum U, Ueffing M, Garanto A, Roepman R, Collin RWJ (2020) PCARE and WASF3 regulate ciliary F-actin assembly that is required for the initiation of photoreceptor outer segment disk formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:9922–9931. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903125117
Lamba DA, Karl MO, Ware CB, Reh TA (2006) Efficient generation of retinal progenitor cells from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:12769–12774. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601990103
Osakada F, Ikeda H, Mandai M, Wataya T, Watanabe K, Yoshimura N, Akaike A, Sasai Y, Takahashi M (2008) Toward the generation of rod and cone photoreceptors from mouse, monkey and human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 26:215–224. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1384
Meyer JS, Shearer RL, Capowski EE, Wright LS, Wallace KA, McMillan EL, Zhang S-C, Gamm DM (2009) Modeling early retinal development with human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:16698–16703. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905245106
Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, Sekiguchi K, Adachi T, Sasai Y (2011) Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09941
Nakano T, Ando S, Takata N, Kawada M, Muguruma K, Sekiguchi K, Saito K, Yonemura S, Eiraku M, Sasai Y (2012) Self-formation of optic cups and storable stratified neural retina from human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell 10:771–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.009
Reichman S, Terray A, Slembrouck A, Nanteau C, Orieux G, Habeler W, Nandrot EF, Sahel JA, Monville C, Goureau O (2014) From confluent human iPS cells to self-forming neural retina and retinal pigmented epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:8518–8523. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324212111
Gonzalez-Cordero A, Kruczek K, Naeem A, Fernando M, Kloc M, Ribeiro J, Goh D, Duran Y, Blackford SJI, Abelleira-Hervas L, Sampson RD, Shum IO, Branch MJ, Gardner PJ, Sowden JC, Bainbridge JWB, Smith AJ, West EL, Pearson RA, Ali RR (2017) Recapitulation of human retinal development from human pluripotent stem cells generates transplantable populations of cone photoreceptors. Stem Cell Rep 9:820–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.07.022
Lowe A, Harris R, Bhansali P, Cvekl A, Liu W (2016) Intercellular adhesion-dependent cell survival and ROCK-regulated actomyosin-driven forces mediate self-formation of a retinal organoid. Stem Cell Reports 6:743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.03.011
Haynes T, Gutierrez C, Aycinena J-C, Tsonis PA, Del Rio-Tsonis K (2007) BMP signaling mediates stem/progenitor cell-induced retina regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:20380–20385. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0708202104
Huang J, Liu Y, Oltean A, Beebe DC (2015) Bmp4 from the optic vesicle specifies murine retina formation. Dev Biol 402:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.03.006
Kuwahara A, Ozone C, Nakano T, Saito K, Eiraku M, Sasai Y (2015) Generation of a ciliary margin-like stem cell niche from self-organizing human retinal tissue. Nat Commun 6:6286. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7286
Mellough CB, Collin J, Khazim M, White K, Sernagor E, Steel DH, Lako M (2015) IGF-1 signaling plays an important role in the formation of three-dimensional laminated neural retina and other ocular structures from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 33:2416–2430. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2023
Zerti D, Molina MM, Dorgau B, Mearns S, Bauer R, Al-Aama J, Lako M (2021) IGFBPs mediate IGF-1’s functions in retinal lamination and photoreceptor development during pluripotent stem cell differentiation to retinal organoids. Stem Cells 39:458–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3331
Chichagova V, Hilgen G, Ghareeb A, Georgiou M, Carter M, Sernagor E, Lako M, Armstrong L (2020) Human iPSC differentiation to retinal organoids in response to IGF1 and BMP4 activation is line- and method-dependent. Stem Cells 38:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3116
Kaya KD, Chen HY, Brooks MJ, Kelley RA, Shimada H, Nagashima K, de Val N, Drinnan CT, Gieser L, Kruczek K, Erceg S, Li T, Lukovic D, Adlakha YK, Welby E, Swaroop A (2019) Transcriptome-based molecular staging of human stem cell-derived retinal organoids uncovers accelerated photoreceptor differentiation by 9-cis retinal. Mol Vis 25:663–678
Wagstaff PE, ten Asbroek ALMA, ten Brink JB, Jansonius NM, Bergen AAB (2021) An alternative approach to produce versatile retinal organoids with accelerated ganglion cell development. Sci Rep 11:1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79651-x
Bartsch U, Oriyakhel W, Kenna PF, Linke S, Richard G, Petrowitz B, Humphries P, Farrar GJ, Ader M (2008) Retinal cells integrate into the outer nuclear layer and differentiate into mature photoreceptors after subretinal transplantation into adult mice. Exp Eye Res 86:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.01.018
MacLaren RE, Pearson RA, MacNeil A, Douglas RH, Salt TE, Akimoto M, Swaroop A, Sowden JC, Ali RR (2006) Retinal repair by transplantation of photoreceptor precursors. Nature 444:203–207. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05161
Santos-Ferreira T, Llonch S, Borsch O, Postel K, Haas J, Ader M (2016) Retinal transplantation of photoreceptors results in donor-host cytoplasmic exchange. Nat Commun 7:13028. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13028
Singh MS, Balmer J, Barnard AR, Aslam SA, Moralli D, Green CM, Barnea-Cramer A, Duncan I, MacLaren RE (2016) Transplanted photoreceptor precursors transfer proteins to host photoreceptors by a mechanism of cytoplasmic fusion. Nat Commun 7:13537. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13537
Pearson RA, Gonzalez-Cordero A, West EL, Ribeiro JR, Aghaizu N, Goh D, Sampson RD, Georgiadis A, Waldron PV, Duran Y, Naeem A, Kloc M, Cristante E, Kruczek K, Warre-Cornish K, Sowden JC, Smith AJ, Ali RR (2016) Donor and host photoreceptors engage in material transfer following transplantation of post-mitotic photoreceptor precursors. Nat Commun 7:13029. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13029
Gasparini SJ, Llonch S, Borsch O, Ader M (2019) Transplantation of photoreceptors into the degenerative retina: current state and future perspectives. Prog Retin Eye Res 69:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.11.001
Lamba DA, Gust J, Reh TA (2009) Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived photoreceptors restores some visual function in Crx-deficient mice. Cell Stem Cell 4:73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2008.10.015
Gonzalez-Cordero A, West EL, Pearson RA, Duran Y, Carvalho LS, Chu CJ, Naeem A, Blackford SJI, Georgiadis A, Lakowski J, Hubank M, Smith AJ, Bainbridge JWB, Sowden JC, Ali RR (2013) Photoreceptor precursors derived from three-dimensional embryonic stem cell cultures integrate and mature within adult degenerate retina. Nat Biotechnol 31:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2643
Mears AJ, Kondo M, Swain PK, Takada Y, Bush RA, Saunders TL, Sieving PA, Swaroop A (2001) Nrl is required for rod photoreceptor development. Nat Genet 29:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng774
Kruczek K, Gonzalez-Cordero A, Goh D, Naeem A, Jonikas M, Blackford SJI, Kloc M, Duran Y, Georgiadis A, Sampson RD, Maswood RN, Smith AJ, Decembrini S, Arsenijevic Y, Sowden JC, Pearson RA, West EL, Ali RR (2017) Differentiation and transplantation of embryonic stem cell-derived cone photoreceptors into a mouse model of end-stage retinal degeneration. Stem Cell Rep 8:1659–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.04.030
Zhou PY, Peng GH, Xu H, Yin ZQ (2015) c-Kit+ cells isolated from human fetal retinas represent a new population of retinal progenitor cells. J Cell Sci 128:2169–2178. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.169086
Zou T, Gao L, Zeng Y, Li Q, Li Y, Chen S, Hu X, Chen X, Fu C, Xu H, Yin ZQ (2019) Organoid-derived C-Kit(+)/SSEA4(-) human retinal progenitor cells promote a protective retinal microenvironment during transplantation in rodents. Nat Commun 10:1205. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08961-0
Lakowski J, Han YT, Pearson RA, Gonzalez-Cordero A, West EL, Gualdoni S, Barber AC, Hubank M, Ali RR, Sowden JC (2011) Effective transplantation of photoreceptor precursor cells selected via cell surface antigen expression. Stem Cells 29:1391–1404. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.694
Lakowski J, Gonzalez-Cordero A, West EL, Han YT, Welby E, Naeem A, Blackford SJ, Bainbridge JW, Pearson RA, Ali RR, Sowden JC (2015) Transplantation of photoreceptor precursors isolated via a cell surface biomarker panel from embryonic stem cell-derived self-forming retina. Stem Cells 33:2469–2482. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2051
Gagliardi G, Ben M’Barek K, Chaffiol A, Slembrouck-Brec A, Conart JB, Nanteau C, Rabesandratana O, Sahel JA, Duebel J, Orieux G, Reichman S, Goureau O (2018) Characterization and transplantation of CD73-positive photoreceptors isolated from human iPSC-derived retinal organoids. Stem Cell Rep 11:665–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.07.005
Lakowski J, Welby E, Budinger D, Di Marco F, Di Foggia V, Bainbridge JWB, Wallace K, Gamm DM, Ali RR, Sowden JC (2018) Isolation of human photoreceptor precursors via a cell surface marker panel from stem cell-derived retinal organoids and fetal retinae. STEM CELLS 36:709–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2775
Stone NE, Voigt AP, Cooke JA, Giacalone JC, Hanasoge S, Mullins RF, Tucker BA, Sulchek T (2020) Label-free microfluidic enrichment of photoreceptor cells. Exp Eye Res 199:108166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2020.108166
Santos-Ferreira TF, Borsch O, Ader M (2016) Rebuilding the missing part-a review on photoreceptor transplantation. Front Syst Neurosci 10:105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00105
Schwartz SD, Regillo CD, Lam BL, Eliott D, Rosenfeld PJ, Gregori NZ, Hubschman JP, Davis JL, Heilwell G, Spirn M, Maguire J, Gay R, Bateman J, Ostrick RM, Morris D, Vincent M, Anglade E, Del Priore LV, Lanza R (2015) Human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium in patients with age-related macular degeneration and Stargardt’s macular dystrophy: follow-up of two open-label phase 1/2 studies. Lancet 385:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61376-3
Singh MS, Park SS, Albini TA, Canto-Soler MV, Klassen H, MacLaren RE, Takahashi M, Nagiel A, Schwartz SD, Bharti K (2020) Retinal stem cell transplantation: balancing safety and potential. Prog Retin Eye Res 75:100779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2019.100779
Assawachananont J, Mandai M, Okamoto S, Yamada C, Eiraku M, Yonemura S, Sasai Y, Takahashi M (2014) Transplantation of embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived 3D retinal sheets into retinal degenerative mice. Stem Cell Reports 2:662–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.03.011
Shirai H, Mandai M, Matsushita K, Kuwahara A, Yonemura S, Nakano T, Assawachananont J, Kimura T, Saito K, Terasaki H, Eiraku M, Sasai Y, Takahashi M (2016) Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal tissue in two primate models of retinal degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E81-90. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1512590113
Mandai M, Fujii M, Hashiguchi T, Sunagawa GA, Ito SI, Sun J, Kaneko J, Sho J, Yamada C, Takahashi M (2017) iPSC-derived retina transplants improve vision in rd1 end-stage retinal-degeneration mice. Stem Cell Rep 8:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.12.008
McLelland BT, Lin B, Mathur A, Aramant RB, Thomas BB, Nistor G, Keirstead HS, Seiler MJ (2018) Transplanted hESC-derived retina organoid sheets differentiate, integrate, and improve visual function in retinal degenerate rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 59:2586–2603. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23646
Singh RK, Occelli LM, Binette F, Petersen-Jones SM, Nasonkin IO (2019) Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal tissue in the subretinal space of the cat eye. Stem Cells Dev 28:1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2019.0090
Tu HY, Watanabe T, Shirai H, Yamasaki S, Kinoshita M, Matsushita K, Hashiguchi T, Onoe H, Matsuyama T, Kuwahara A, Kishino A, Kimura T, Eiraku M, Suzuma K, Kitaoka T, Takahashi M, Mandai M (2019) Medium- to long-term survival and functional examination of human iPSC-derived retinas in rat and primate models of retinal degeneration. EBioMedicine 39:562–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.028
West EL, Pearson RA, Tschernutter M, Sowden JC, MacLaren RE, Ali RR (2008) Pharmacological disruption of the outer limiting membrane leads to increased retinal integration of transplanted photoreceptor precursors. Exp Eye Res 86:601–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2008.01.004
Pearson RA, Barber AC, West EL, MacLaren RE, Duran Y, Bainbridge JW, Sowden JC, Ali RR (2010) Targeted disruption of outer limiting membrane junctional proteins (Crb1 and ZO-1) increases integration of transplanted photoreceptor precursors into the adult wild-type and degenerating retina. Cell Transplant 19:487–503. https://doi.org/10.3727/096368909x486057
Barber AC, Hippert C, Duran Y, West EL, Bainbridge JW, Warre-Cornish K, Luhmann UF, Lakowski J, Sowden JC, Ali RR, Pearson RA (2013) Repair of the degenerate retina by photoreceptor transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:354–359. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212677110
Srivastava A (2016) In vivo tissue-tropism of adeno-associated viral vectors. Curr Opin Virol 21:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coviro.2016.08.003
Auricchio A, Kobinger G, Anand V, Hildinger M, O’Connor E, Maguire AM, Wilson JM, Bennett J (2001) Exchange of surface proteins impacts on viral vector cellular specificity and transduction characteristics: the retina as a model. Hum Mol Genet 10:3075–3081. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/10.26.3075
Klimczak RR, Koerber JT, Dalkara D, Flannery JG, Schaffer DV (2009) A novel adeno-associated viral variant for efficient and selective intravitreal transduction of rat Müller cells. PLoS ONE 4:e7467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007467
Gonzalez-Cordero A, Goh D, Kruczek K, Naeem A, Fernando M, Kleine Holthaus SM, Takaaki M, Blackford SJI, Kloc M, Agundez L, Sampson RD, Borooah S, Ovando-Roche P, Mehat MS, West EL, Smith AJ, Pearson RA, Ali RR (2018) Assessment of AAV vector tropisms for mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived RPE and photoreceptor cells. Hum Gene Ther 29:1124–1139. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2018.027
Khabou H, Garita-Hernandez M, Chaffiol A, Reichman S, Jaillard C, Brazhnikova E, Bertin S, Forster V, Desrosiers M, Winckler C, Goureau O, Picaud S, Duebel J, Sahel J-A, Dalkara D (2018) Noninvasive gene delivery to foveal cones for vision restoration. JCI Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.96029
Garita-Hernandez M, Routet F, Guibbal L, Khabou H, Toualbi L, Riancho L, Reichman S, Duebel J, Sahel J-A, Goureau O, Dalkara D (2020) AAV-mediated gene delivery to 3D retinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Int J Mol Sci 21:99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21030994
Lane A, Jovanovic K, Shortall C, Ottaviani D, Panes AB, Schwarz N, Guarascio R, Hayes MJ, Palfi A, Chadderton N, Farrar GJ, Hardcastle AJ, Cheetham ME (2020) Modelling and rescue of RP2 retinitis pigmentosa using iPSC derived retinal organoids. Stem Cell Rep 15:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.05.007
Achberger K, Cipriano M, Düchs M, Schön C, Michelfelder S, Stierstorfer B, Lamla T, Kauschke SG, Chuchuy J, Roosz J, Mesch L, Cora V, Pars S, Pashkovskaia N, Corti S, Kleger A, Kreuz S, Maier U, Liebau S, Loskill P (2021) Human stem cell-based retina-on-chip as new translational model for validation of AAV retinal gene therapy vectors. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.02.433550
Pavlou M, Schön C, Occelli LM, Rossi A, Meumann N, Boyd RF, Bartoe JT, Siedlecki J, Gerhardt MJ, Babutzka S, Bogedein J, Wagner JE, Priglinger SG, Biel M, Petersen-Jones SM, Büning H, Michalakis S (2021) Novel AAV capsids for intravitreal gene therapy of photoreceptor disorders. EMBO Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202013392
Völkner M, Pavlou M, Büning H, Michalakis S, Karl M (2021) Optimized adeno-associated virus vectors for efficient transduction of human retinal organoids. Hum Gene Ther. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2020.321
Madrakhimov SB, Yang JY, Ahn DH, Han JW, Ha TH, Park TK (2020) Peripapillary intravitreal injection improves AAV-mediated retinal transduction. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 17:647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2020.03.018
Vázquez-Domínguez I, Garanto A, Collin RWJ (2019) Molecular therapies for inherited retinal diseases-current standing, opportunities and challenges. Genes 10:654. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10090654
Collin RW, Garanto A (2017) Applications of antisense oligonucleotides for the treatment of inherited retinal diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 28:260–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000000363
Parfitt DA, Lane A, Ramsden CM, Carr AJ, Munro PM, Jovanovic K, Schwarz N, Kanuga N, Muthiah MN, Hull S, Gallo JM, da Cruz L, Moore AT, Hardcastle AJ, Coffey PJ, Cheetham ME (2016) Identification and correction of mechanisms underlying inherited blindness in human iPSC-derived optic cups. Cell Stem Cell 18:769–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2016.03.021
Dulla K, Aguila M, Lane A, Jovanovic K, Parfitt DA, Schulkens I, Chan HL, Schmidt I, Beumer W, Vorthoren L, Collin RWJ, Garanto A, Duijkers L, Brugulat-Panes A, Semo M, Vugler AA, Biasutto P, Adamson P, Cheetham ME (2018) Splice-modulating oligonucleotide QR-110 restores CEP290 mRNA and function in human c.2991+1655A>G LCA10 models. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 12:730–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2018.07.010
Khan M, Arno G, Fakin A, Parfitt DA, Dhooge PPA, Albert S, Bax NM, Duijkers L, Niblock M, Hau KL, Bloch E, Schiff ER, Piccolo D, Hogden MC, Hoyng CB, Webster AR, Cremers FPM, Cheetham ME, Garanto A, Collin RWJ (2020) Detailed phenotyping and therapeutic strategies for intronic ABCA4 variants in stargardt disease. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 21:412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2020.06.007
Dulla K, Slijkerman R, van Diepen HC, Albert S, Dona M, Beumer W, Turunen JJ, Chan HL, Schulkens IA, Vorthoren L, den Besten C, Buil L, Schmidt I, Miao J, Venselaar H, Zang J, Neuhauss SCF, Peters T, Broekman S, Pennings R, Kremer H, Platenburg G, Adamson P, de Vrieze E, van Wijk E (2021) Antisense oligonucleotide-based treatment of retinitis pigmentosa caused by USH2A exon 13 mutations. Mol Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.04.024
Díaz N, Kruse K, Erdmann T, Staiger AM, Ott G, Lenz G, Vaquerizas JM (2018) Chromatin conformation analysis of primary patient tissue using a low input Hi-C method. Nat Commun 9:4938. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06961-0
Rao Suhas SP, Huntley Miriam H, Durand Neva C, Stamenova Elena K, Bochkov Ivan D, Robinson James T, Sanborn Adrian L, Machol I, Omer Arina D, Lander Eric S, Aiden Erez L (2014) A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159:1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021
de Bruijn SE, Fiorentino A, Ottaviani D, Fanucchi S, Melo US, Corral-Serrano JC, Mulders T, Georgiou M, Rivolta C, Pontikos N, Arno G, Roberts L, Greenberg J, Albert S, Gilissen C, Aben M, Rebello G, Mead S, Raymond FL, Corominas J, Smith CEL, Kremer H, Downes S, Black GC, Webster AR, Inglehearn CF, van den Born LI, Koenekoop RK, Michaelides M, Ramesar RS, Hoyng CB, Mundlos S, Mhlanga MM, Cremers FPM, Cheetham ME, Roosing S, Hardcastle AJ (2020) Structural variants create new topological-associated domains and ectopic retinal enhancer-gene contact in dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Human Genetics 107:802–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.09.002
Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ (2013) Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods 10:1213–1218. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2688
Wang J, Zibetti C, Shang P, Sripathi SR, Zhang P, Cano M, Hoang T, Xia S, Ji H, Merbs SL, Zack DJ, Handa JT, Sinha D, Blackshaw S, Qian J (2018) ATAC-Seq analysis reveals a widespread decrease of chromatin accessibility in age-related macular degeneration. Nat Commun 9:1364–1364. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03856-y
Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW (2008) Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 358:2606–2617. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0801537
Saiki R, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis K, Horn G, Erlich H, Arnheim N (1985) Enzymatic amplification of beta-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350–1354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2999980
Freeman WM, Walker SJ, Vrana KE (1999) Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfalls and potential. Biotechniques 26:112–125. https://doi.org/10.2144/99261rv01
Xu W, Seok J, Mindrinos MN, Schweitzer AC, Jiang H, Wilhelmy J, Clark TA, Kapur K, Xing Y, Faham M, Storey JD, Moldawer LL, Maier RV, Tompkins RG, Wong WH, Davis RW, Xiao W (2011) Human transcriptome array for high-throughput clinical studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:3707–3712. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019753108
Binder H, Preibisch S (2005) Specific and nonspecific hybridization of oligonucleotide probes on microarrays. Biophys J 89:337–352. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.055343
Kaewkhaw R, Kaya KD, Brooks M, Homma K, Zou J, Chaitankar V, Rao M, Swaroop A (2015) Transcriptome dynamics of developing photoreceptors in three-dimensional retina cultures recapitulates temporal sequence of human cone and rod differentiation revealing cell surface markers and gene networks. Stem Cells 33:3504–3518. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2122
Welby E, Lakowski J, Di Foggia V, Budinger D, Gonzalez-Cordero A, Lun ATL, Epstein M, Patel A, Cuevas E, Kruczek K, Naeem A, Minneci F, Hubank M, Jones DT, Marioni JC, Ali RR, Sowden JC (2017) Isolation and comparative transcriptome analysis of human fetal and iPSC-derived cone photoreceptor cells. Stem Cell Rep 9:1898–1915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.018
Chu L-F, Leng N, Zhang J, Hou Z, Mamott D, Vereide DT, Choi J, Kendziorski C, Stewart R, Thomson JA (2016) Single-cell RNA-seq reveals novel regulators of human embryonic stem cell differentiation to definitive endoderm. Genome Biol 17:173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1033-x
Phillips MJ, Jiang P, Howden S, Barney P, Min J, York NW, Chu LF, Capowski EE, Cash A, Jain S, Barlow K, Tabassum T, Stewart R, Pattnaik BR, Thomson JA, Gamm DM (2018) A novel approach to single cell RNA-sequence analysis facilitates in silico gene reporting of human pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal cell types. Stem Cells 36:313–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2755
Collin J, Queen R, Zerti D, Dorgau B, Hussain R, Coxhead J, Cockell S, Lako M (2019) Deconstructing retinal organoids: single cell RNA-Seq reveals the cellular components of human pluripotent stem cell-derived retina. Stem Cells 37:593–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2963
Kim S, Lowe A, Dharmat R, Lee S, Owen LA, Wang J, Shakoor A, Li Y, Morgan DJ, Hejazi AA, Cvekl A, DeAngelis MM, Zhou ZJ, Chen R, Liu W (2019) Generation, transcriptome profiling, and functional validation of cone-rich human retinal organoids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116:10824–10833. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901572116
Lu Y, Shiau F, Yi W, Lu S, Wu Q, Pearson JD, Kallman A, Zhong S, Hoang T, Zuo Z, Zhao F, Zhang M, Tsai N, Zhuo Y, He S, Zhang J, Stein-O’Brien GL, Sherman TD, Duan X, Fertig EJ, Goff LA, Zack DJ, Handa JT, Xue T, Bremner R, Blackshaw S, Wang X, Clark BS (2020) Single-cell analysis of human retina identifies evolutionarily conserved and species-specific mechanisms controlling development. Dev Cell 53:473-491.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2020.04.009
Pasquini G, Cora V, Swiersy A, Achberger K, Antkowiak L, Müller B, Wimmer T, Fraschka SA, Casadei N, Ueffing M, Liebau S, Stieger K, Busskamp V (2020) Using transcriptomic analysis to assess double-strand break repair activity: towards precise in vivo genome editing. Int J Mol Sci 21:1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041380
Buskin A, Zhu L, Chichagova V, Basu B, Mozaffari-Jovin S, Dolan D, Droop A, Collin J, Bronstein R, Mehrotra S, Farkas M, Hilgen G, White K, Pan K-T, Treumann A, Hallam D, Bialas K, Chung G, Mellough C, Ding Y, Krasnogor N, Przyborski S, Zwolinski S, Al-Aama J, Alharthi S, Xu Y, Wheway G, Szymanska K, McKibbin M, Inglehearn CF, Elliott DJ, Lindsay S, Ali RR, Steel DH, Armstrong L, Sernagor E, Urlaub H, Pierce E, Lührmann R, Grellscheid S-N, Johnson CA, Lako M (2018) Disrupted alternative splicing for genes implicated in splicing and ciliogenesis causes PRPF31 retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Commun 9:4234–4234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06448-y
Lukovic D, Artero Castro A, Kaya KD, Munezero D, Gieser L, Davo-Martinez C, Corton M, Cuenca N, Swaroop A, Ramamurthy V, Ayuso C, Erceg S (2020) Retinal organoids derived from hiPSCs of an AIPL1-LCA patient maintain cytoarchitecture despite reduced levels of mutant AIPL1. Sci Rep 10:5426. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62047-2
Deng W-L, Gao M-L, Lei X-L, Lv J-N, Zhao H, He K-W, Xia X-X, Li L-Y, Chen Y-C, Li Y-P, Pan D, Xue T, Jin Z-B (2018) Gene correction reverses ciliopathy and photoreceptor loss in iPSC-derived retinal organoids from retinitis pigmentosa patients. Stem Cell Rep 10:1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2018.02.003
Huang KC, Wang ML, Chen SJ, Kuo JC, Wang WJ, Nhi Nguyen PN, Wahlin KJ, Lu JF, Tran AA, Shi M, Chien Y, Yarmishyn AA, Tsai PH, Yang TC, Jane WN, Chang CC, Peng CH, Schlaeger TM, Chiou SH (2019) Morphological and molecular defects in human three-dimensional retinal organoid model of X-linked Juvenile Retinoschisis. Stem Cell Rep 13:906–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.09.010
Sundar J, Matalkah F, Jeong B, Stoilov P, Ramamurthy V (2020) The Musashi proteins MSI1 and MSI2 are required for photoreceptor morphogenesis and vision in mice. J Biol Chem 296:100048. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.RA120.015714
Ling JP, Wilks C, Charles R, Leavey PJ, Ghosh D, Jiang L, Santiago CP, Pang B, Venkataraman A, Clark BS, Nellore A, Langmead B, Blackshaw S (2020) ASCOT identifies key regulators of neuronal subtype-specific splicing. Nat Commun 11:137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14020-5
Cideciyan AV, Jacobson SG, Drack AV, Ho AC, Charng J, Garafalo AV, Roman AJ, Sumaroka A, Han IC, Hochstedler MD, Pfeifer WL, Sohn EH, Taiel M, Schwartz MR, Biasutto P, Wit W, Cheetham ME, Adamson P, Rodman DM, Platenburg G, Tome MD, Balikova I, Nerinckx F, Zaeytijd J, Van Cauwenbergh C, Leroy BP, Russell SR (2019) Effect of an intravitreal antisense oligonucleotide on vision in Leber congenital amaurosis due to a photoreceptor cilium defect. Nat Med 25:225–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0295-0
Arno G, Agrawal SA, Eblimit A, Bellingham J, Xu M, Wang F, Chakarova C, Parfitt DA, Lane A, Burgoyne T, Hull S, Carss KJ, Fiorentino A, Hayes MJ, Munro PM, Nicols R, Pontikos N, Holder GE, Ukirdc AC, Raymond FL, Moore AT, Plagnol V, Michaelides M, Hardcastle AJ, Li Y, Cukras C, Webster AR, Cheetham ME, Chen R (2016) Mutations in REEP6 cause autosomal-recessive retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Hum Genet 99:1305–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.10.008
Vig A, Poulter JA, Ottaviani D, Tavares E, Toropova K, Tracewska AM, Mollica A, Kang J, Kehelwathugoda O, Paton T, Maynes JT, Wheway G, Arno G, Khan KN, McKibbin M, Toomes C, Ali M, Di Scipio M, Li S, Ellingford J, Black G, Webster A, Rydzanicz M, Stawiński P, Płoski R, Vincent A, Cheetham ME, Inglehearn CF, Roberts A, Heon E (2020) DYNC2H1 hypomorphic or retina-predominant variants cause nonsyndromic retinal degeneration. Genet Med 22:2041–2051. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0915-1
Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, Gomez-Cabrero D, Cervera A, McPherson A, Szcześniak MW, Gaffney DJ, Elo LL, Zhang X, Mortazavi A (2016) A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol 17:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0881-8
Tilgner H, Jahanbani F, Blauwkamp T, Moshrefi A, Jaeger E, Chen F, Harel I, Bustamante CD, Rasmussen M, Snyder MP (2015) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis using synthetic long-read sequencing reveals molecular co-association of distant splicing events. Nat Biotechnol 33:736–742. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3242
Ghazalpour A, Bennett B, Petyuk VA, Orozco L, Hagopian R, Mungrue IN, Farber CR, Sinsheimer J, Kang HM, Furlotte N, Park CC, Wen PZ, Brewer H, Weitz K, Camp DG 2nd, Pan C, Yordanova R, Neuhaus I, Tilford C, Siemers N, Gargalovic P, Eskin E, Kirchgessner T, Smith DJ, Smith RD, Lusis AJ (2011) Comparative analysis of proteome and transcriptome variation in mouse. PLoS Genet 7:e1001393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001393
Yeung ES (2011) Genome-wide correlation between mRNA and protein in a single cell. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:583–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201005969
Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J (1979) Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:4350–4354. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350
Sharma TP, Wiley LA, Whitmore SS, Anfinson KR, Cranston CM, Oppedal DJ, Daggett HT, Mullins RF, Tucker BA, Stone EM (2017) Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells to evaluate the pathophysiology of TRNT1-associated Retinitis pigmentosa. Stem Cell Res 21:58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2017.03.005
Phillips MJ, Perez ET, Martin JM, Reshel ST, Wallace KA, Capowski EE, Singh R, Wright LS, Clark EM, Barney PM, Stewart R, Dickerson SJ, Miller MJ, Percin EF, Thomson JA, Gamm DM (2014) Modeling human retinal development with patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells reveals multiple roles for visual system homeobox 2. Stem Cells 32:1480–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.1667
Peskova L, Jurcikova D, Vanova T, Krivanek J, Capandova M, Sramkova Z, Kolouskova M, Kotasova H, Streit L, Barta T (2020) miR-183/96/182 cluster is an important morphogenetic factor targeting PAX6 expression in differentiating human retinal organoids. Stem Cells 38:1557–1567. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3272
Boellner S, Becker K-F (2015) Reverse phase protein arrays-quantitative assessment of multiple biomarkers in biopsies for clinical use. Microarrays 4:98–114. https://doi.org/10.3390/microarrays4020098
Wiese S, Reidegeld KA, Meyer HE, Warscheid B (2007) Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research. Proteomics 7:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600422
Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, Mann M (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1:376–386. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.m200025-mcp200
Clish CB (2015) Metabolomics: an emerging but powerful tool for precision medicine. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 1:a000588. https://doi.org/10.1101/mcs.a000588
Tan SZ, Begley P, Mullard G, Hollywood KA, Bishop PN (2016) Introduction to metabolomics and its applications in ophthalmology. Eye 30:773–783. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.37
Laíns I, Gantner M, Murinello S, Lasky-Su JA, Miller JW, Friedlander M, Husain D (2019) Metabolomics in the study of retinal health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 69:57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.11.002
Weygand J, Carter S, Salzillo T, Moussalli M, Dai B, Dutta P, Zuo X, Fleming J, Shureiqi I, Bhattacharya P (2017) Can an organoid recapitulate the metabolome of its parent tissue? A pilot NMR spectroscopy study. J Cancer Prev Curr Res. https://doi.org/10.15406/jcpcr.2017.08.00307
Aqeilan RI (2021) Engineering organoids: a promising platform to understand biology and treat diseases. Cell Death Differ 28:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-020-00680-0
Lindeboom RG, van Voorthuijsen L, Oost KC, Rodríguez-Colman MJ, Luna-Velez MV, Furlan C, Baraille F, Jansen PW, Ribeiro A, Burgering BM, Snippert HJ, Vermeulen M (2018) Integrative multi-omics analysis of intestinal organoid differentiation. Mol Syst Biol 14:e8227. https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188227
Okkelman IA, Neto N, Papkovsky DB, Monaghan MG, Dmitriev RI (2020) A deeper understanding of intestinal organoid metabolism revealed by combining fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) and extracellular flux analyses. Redox Biol 30:101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2019.101420
Browne AW, Arnesano C, Harutyunyan N, Khuu T, Martinez JC, Pollack HA, Koos DS, Lee TC, Fraser SE, Moats RA, Aparicio JG, Cobrinik D (2017) Structural and functional characterization of human stem-cell-derived retinal organoids by live imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58:3311–3318. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-20796
Scholler J, Groux K, Goureau O, Sahel J-A, Fink M, Reichman S, Boccara C, Grieve K (2020) Dynamic full-field optical coherence tomography: 3D live-imaging of retinal organoids. Light, Sci Appl 9:140–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-00375-8
Hallam D, Hilgen G, Dorgau B, Zhu L, Yu M, Bojic S, Hewitt P, Schmitt M, Uteng M, Kustermann S, Steel D, Nicholds M, Thomas R, Treumann A, Porter A, Sernagor E, Armstrong L, Lako M (2018) Human-induced pluripotent stem cells generate light responsive retinal organoids with variable and nutrient-dependent efficiency. Stem Cells 36:1535–1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2883
Willems E, Lorés-Motta L, Zanichelli A, Suffritti C, van der Flier M, van der Molen RG, Langereis JD, van Drongelen J, van den Heuvel LP, Volokhina E, van de Kar NC, Keizer-Garritsen J, Levin M, Herberg JA, Martinon-Torres F, Wessels HJ, de Breuk A, Fauser S, Hoyng CB, den Hollander AI, de Groot R, van Gool AJ, Gloerich J, de Jonge MI (2020) Quantitative multiplex profiling of the complement system to diagnose complement-mediated diseases. Clin Transl Immunol 9:e1225. https://doi.org/10.1002/cti2.1225
Hancock RJ, Yendle JE, Bradley BA (1989) MicroELISA assays of anti-HLA activity and isotype of human monoclonal antibodies. Tissue Antigens 33:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0039.1989.tb01692.x
Kremlitzka M, Geerlings MJ, de Jong S, Bakker B, Nilsson SC, Fauser S, Hoyng CB, de Jong EK, den Hollander AI, Blom AM (2018) Functional analyses of rare genetic variants in complement component C9 identified in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 27:2678–2688. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy178
de Jong S, Volokhina EB, de Breuk A, Nilsson SC, de Jong EK, van der Kar N, Bakker B, Hoyng CB, van den Heuvel LP, Blom AM, den Hollander AI (2020) Effect of rare coding variants in the CFI gene on Factor I expression levels. Hum Mol Genet 29:2313–2324. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddaa114
Stiles M, Qi H, Sun E, Tan J, Porter H, Allegood J, Chalfant CE, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, LaVail MM, Mandal NA (2016) Sphingolipid profile alters in retinal dystrophic P23H–1 rats and systemic FTY720 can delay retinal degeneration. J Lipid Res 57:818–831. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M063719
Pereiro X, Fernández R, Barreda-Gómez G, Ruzafa N, Acera A, Araiz J, Astigarraga E, Vecino E (2020) Comparative lipidomic analysis of mammalian retinal ganglion cells and Müller glia in situ and in vitro using high-resolution imaging mass spectrometry. Sci Rep 10:20053. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77087-x
Sibille E, Berdeaux O, Martine L, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP, He Z, Thuret G, Bretillon L, Masson EA (2016) Ganglioside profiling of the human retina: comparison with other ocular structures, brain and plasma reveals tissue specificities. PLoS ONE 11:e0168794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168794
Zhuo C, Hou W, Tian H, Wang L, Li R (2020) Lipidomics of the brain, retina, and biofluids: from the biological landscape to potential clinical application in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 10:391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01080-1
Brush RS, Tran JT, Henry KR, McClellan ME, Elliott MH, Mandal MN (2010) Retinal sphingolipids and their very-long-chain fatty acid-containing species. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51:4422–4431. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5134
Acar N, Berdeaux O, Grégoire S, Cabaret S, Martine L, Gain P, Thuret G, Creuzot-Garcher CP, Bron AM, Bretillon L (2012) Lipid composition of the human eye: are red blood cells a good mirror of retinal and optic nerve fatty acids? PLoS ONE 7:e35102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035102
Ford DA, Monda JK, Brush RS, Anderson RE, Richards MJ, Fliesler SJ (2008) Lipidomic analysis of the retina in a rat model of Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: alterations in docosahexaenoic acid content of phospholipid molecular species. J Neurochem 105:1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05203.x
Garanto A, Mandal NA, Egido-Gabás M, Marfany G, Fabriàs G, Anderson RE, Casas J, Gonzàlez-Duarte R (2013) Specific sphingolipid content decrease in Cerkl knockdown mouse retinas. Exp Eye Res 110:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2013.03.003
Gantner ML, Eade K, Wallace M, Handzlik MK, Fallon R, Trombley J, Bonelli R, Giles S, Harkins-Perry S, Heeren TFC, Sauer L, Ideguchi Y, Baldini M, Scheppke L, Dorrell MI, Kitano M, Hart BJ, Cai C, Nagasaki T, Badur MG, Okada M, Woods SM, Egan C, Gillies M, Guymer R, Eichler F, Bahlo M, Fruttiger M, Allikmets R, Bernstein PS, Metallo CM, Friedlander M (2019) Serine and lipid metabolism in macular disease and peripheral neuropathy. N Engl J Med 381:1422–1433. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1815111
Coons AH, Creech HJ, Norman JR, Berliner E (1942) The demonstration of pneumococcal antigen in tissues by the use of fluorescent antibody. J Immunol 45:159–170
Zheng C, Schneider JW, Hsieh J (2020) Role of RB1 in human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal organoids. Dev Biol 462:197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.03.011
Svoboda K, Yasuda R (2006) Principles of two-photon excitation microscopy and its applications to neuroscience. Neuron 50:823–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.05.019
Power RM, Huisken J (2017) A guide to light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for multiscale imaging. Nat Methods 14:360–373. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4224
Cora V, Haderspeck J, Antkowiak L, Mattheus U, Neckel PH, Mack AF, Bolz S, Ueffing M, Pashkovskaia N, Achberger K, Liebau S (2019) A cleared view on retinal organoids. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8050391
Yang B, Treweek Jennifer B, Kulkarni Rajan P, Deverman Benjamin E, Chen C-K, Lubeck E, Shah S, Cai L, Gradinaru V (2014) Single-cell phenotyping within transparent intact tissue through whole-body clearing. Cell 158:945–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.017
Belle M, Godefroy D, Dominici C, Heitz-Marchaland C, Zelina P, Hellal F, Bradke F, Chédotal A (2014) A simple method for 3D analysis of immunolabeled axonal tracts in a transparent nervous system. Cell Rep 9:1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.037
Reichman S, Slembrouck A, Gagliardi G, Chaffiol A, Terray A, Nanteau C, Potey A, Belle M, Rabesandratana O, Duebel J, Orieux G, Nandrot EF, Sahel JA, Goureau O (2017) Generation of storable retinal organoids and retinal pigmented epithelium from adherent human iPS cells in xeno-free and feeder-free conditions. Stem Cells 35:1176–1188. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2586
Vergara MN, Flores-Bellver M, Aparicio-Domingo S, McNally M, Wahlin KJ, Saxena MT, Mumm JS, Canto-Soler MV (2017) Three-dimensional automated reporter quantification (3D-ARQ) technology enables quantitative screening in retinal organoids. Development 144:3698–3705. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.146290
Quinn PM, Buck TM, Mulder AA, Ohonin C, Alves CH, Vos RM, Bialecka M, van Herwaarden T, van Dijk EHC, Talib M, Freund C, Mikkers HMM, Hoeben RC, Goumans M-J, Boon CJF, Koster AJ, de Sousa C, Lopes SM, Jost CR, Wijnholds J (2019) Human iPSC-derived retinas recapitulate the fetal CRB1 CRB2 complex formation and demonstrate that photoreceptors and Müller glia are targets of AAV5. Stem Cell Rep 12:906–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.03.002
Ovando-Roche P, West EL, Branch MJ, Sampson RD, Fernando M, Munro P, Georgiadis A, Rizzi M, Kloc M, Naeem A, Ribeiro J, Smith AJ, Gonzalez-Cordero A, Ali RR (2018) Use of bioreactors for culturing human retinal organoids improves photoreceptor yields. Stem Cell Res Ther 9:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0907-0
Burgoyne T, Lane A, Laughlin WE, Cheetham ME, Futter CE (2018) Correlative light and immuno-electron microscopy of retinal tissue cryostat sections. PLoS ONE 13:e0191048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191048
Kornreich BG (2007) The patch clamp technique: principles and technical considerations. J Vet Cardiol 9:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvc.2007.02.001
Neher E, Sakmann B (1976) Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature 260:799–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/260799a0
Hurley JB (2009) Phototransduction. In: Squire LR (ed) Encyclopedia of neuroscience. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 687–692
Sandell JH (1998) GABA as a developmental signal in the inner retina and optic nerve. Perspect Dev Neurobiol 5:269–278
Meyer JS, Howden SE, Wallace KA, Verhoeven AD, Wright LS, Capowski EE, Pinilla I, Martin JM, Tian S, Stewart R, Pattnaik B, Thomson JA, Gamm DM (2011) Optic vesicle-like structures derived from human pluripotent stem cells facilitate a customized approach to retinal disease treatment. Stem Cells 29:1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.674
Garita-Hernandez M, Guibbal L, Toualbi L, Routet F, Chaffiol A, Winckler C, Harinquet M, Robert C, Fouquet S, Bellow S, Sahel JA, Goureau O, Duebel J, Dalkara D (2018) Optogenetic light sensors in human retinal organoids. Front Neurosci 12:789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00789
Reinhard K, Tikidji-Hamburyan A, Seitter H, Idrees S, Mutter M, Benkner B, Münch TA (2014) Step-by-step instructions for retina recordings with perforated multi electrode arrays. PLoS ONE 9:e106148–e106148. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106148
Stett A, Egert U, Guenther E, Hofmann F, Meyer T, Nisch W, Haemmerle H (2003) Biological application of microelectrode arrays in drug discovery and basic research. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2149-x
Singh R, Winkler P, Binette F, Petersen-Jones S, Nasonkin I (2021) Comparison of developmental dynamics in human fetal retina and human pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal tissue. Stem Cells Dev 30:399–417. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2020.0085
Young RW (1976) Visual cells and the concept of renewal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 15:700–725
Young RW, Bok D (1969) Participation of the retinal pigment epithelium in the rod outer segment renewal process. J Cell Biol 42:392–403. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.42.2.392
Kocaoglu OP, Liu Z, Zhang F, Kurokawa K, Jonnal RS, Miller DT (2016) Photoreceptor disc shedding in the living human eye. Biomed Opt Express 7:4554–4568. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.004554
Strauss O (2005) The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev 85:845–881. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00021.2004
Kiser PD, Golczak M, Palczewski K (2014) Chemistry of the retinoid (visual) cycle. Chem Rev 114:194–232. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400107q
Morshedian A, Kaylor JJ, Ng SY, Tsan A, Frederiksen R, Xu T, Yuan L, Sampath AP, Radu RA, Fain GL, Travis GH (2019) Light-driven regeneration of cone visual pigments through a mechanism involving RGR opsin in Muller glial cells. Neuron 102:1172-1183.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.004
Kay P, Yang YC, Paraoan L (2013) Directional protein secretion by the retinal pigment epithelium: roles in retinal health and the development of age-related macular degeneration. J Cell Mol Med 17:833–843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12070
Raymond SM, Jackson IJ (1995) The retinal pigmented epithelium is required for development and maintenance of the mouse neural retina. Curr Biol 5:1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00255-7
Sheedlo HJ, Nelson TH, Lin N, Rogers TA, Roque RS, Turner JE (1998) RPE secreted proteins and antibody influence photoreceptor cell survival and maturation. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 107:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-3806(97)00219-8
Achberger K, Probst C, Haderspeck J, Bolz S, Rogal J, Chuchuy J, Nikolova M, Cora V, Antkowiak L, Haq W, Shen N, Schenke-Layland K, Ueffing M, Liebau S, Loskill P (2019) Merging organoid and organ-on-a-chip technology to generate complex multi-layer tissue models in a human retina-on-a-chip platform. Elife 8:e46188. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46188
Bringmann A, Syrbe S, Görner K, Kacza J, Francke M, Wiedemann P, Reichenbach A (2018) The primate fovea: structure, function and development. Prog Retin Eye Res 66:49–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.03.006
da Silva S, Cepko CL (2017) Fgf8 expression and degradation of retinoic acid are required for patterning a high-acuity area in the retina. Dev Cell 42:68-81.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2017.05.024
Li G, Xie B, He L, Zhou T, Gao G, Liu S, Pan G, Ge J, Peng F, Zhong X (2018) Generation of retinal organoids with mature rods and cones from urine-derived human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2018:4968658. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4968658
Birey F, Andersen J, Makinson CD, Islam S, Wei W, Huber N, Fan HC, Metzler KRC, Panagiotakos G, Thom N, O’Rourke NA, Steinmetz LM, Bernstein JA, Hallmayer J, Huguenard JR, Paşca SP (2017) Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature 545:54–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22330
Arık YB, Buijsman W, Loessberg-Zahl J, Cuartas-Vélez C, Veenstra C, Logtenberg S, Grobbink AM, Bergveld P, Gagliardi G, den Hollander AI, Bosschaart N, van den Berg A, Passier R, van der Meer AD (2021) Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip model of the outer blood-retinal barrier with clinically relevant read-outs for tissue permeability and vascular structure. Lab Chip 21:272–283. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0lc00639d
Wang L, Hiler D, Xu B, AlDiri I, Chen X, Zhou X, Griffiths L, Valentine M, Shirinifard A, Sablauer A, Thiagarajan S, Barabas ME, Zhang J, Johnson D, Frase S, Dyer MA (2018) Retinal cell type DNA methylation and histone modifications predict reprogramming efficiency and retinogenesis in 3D organoid cultures. Cell Rep 22:2601–2614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.075
DiStefano T, Chen HY, Panebianco C, Kaya KD, Brooks MJ, Gieser L, Morgan NY, Pohida T, Swaroop A (2018) Accelerated and improved differentiation of retinal organoids from pluripotent stem cells in rotating-wall vessel bioreactors. Stem Cell Rep 10:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.11.001
Kruczek K, Swaroop A (2020) Pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal organoids for disease modeling and development of therapies. Stem Cells 38:1206–1215. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.3239
Regent F, Chen HY, Kelley RA, Qu Z, Swaroop A, Li T (2020) A simple and efficient method for generating human retinal organoids. Mol Vis 26:97–105
D’Costa K, Kosic M, Lam A, Moradipour A, Zhao Y, Radisic M (2020) Biomaterials and culture systems for development of organoid and organ-on-a-chip models. Ann Biomed Eng 48:2002–2027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02498-w
Georgiou M, Chichagova V, Hilgen G, Dorgau B, Sernagor E, Armstrong L, Lako M (2020) Room temperature shipment does not affect the biological activity of pluripotent stem cell-derived retinal organoids. PLoS ONE 15:e0233860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233860
Reidel B, Thompson JW, Farsiu S, Moseley MA, Skiba NP, Arshavsky VY (2011) Proteomic profiling of a layered tissue reveals unique glycolytic specializations of photoreceptor cells. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(M110):002469. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M110.002469
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Giuliana Gagliardi for comments and advice on the manuscript.
Funding
The authors are supported by ZonMW (TOP Grant number 9121 6051 to RR and RWJC), the Foundation Fighting Blindness USA (FFB-PPA-0717RAD to AG and RWJC, and FFB-PPA-1719-RAD to RR and MEC), and the Proefdiervrij project support to TAVA. RR and RWJC are also supported by the Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden, Stichting Retina Nederland Fonds, Stichting Beheer Het Schild, Stichting Blinden-Penning, and Stichting Steunfonds Uitzicht via Uitzicht 2016/2017-22, together with the Gelderse Blindenstichting, Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen, Stichting tot Verbetering van het Lot der Blinden ‘Het Lot’, and Stichting voor gehandicapte kinderen Dowilvo. AG is supported by the Landelijke Stichting voor Blinden en Slechtzienden and Stichting Oogfonds via Uitzicht 2019-17, together with Stichting Blindenhulp, Rotterdamse Stichting Blindenbelangen and Dowilwo. Fight for Sight UK and the Wellcome Trust to MEC. The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this review. They provided unrestricted grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TAVA and JCS produced initial drafts of the manuscript, tables, and figures. RR, AG, RWJC and MEC conceived the idea and edited the manuscript, figures and table drafts. All authors edited and approved the manuscript to be submitted.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Afanasyeva, T.A.V., Corral-Serrano, J.C., Garanto, A. et al. A look into retinal organoids: methods, analytical techniques, and applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 6505–6532 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03917-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-021-03917-4