Abstract
Hydrothermal fluids on the modern seafloor are important carriers of base and precious metals in a wide range of volcanic and tectonic settings. The concentrations and distribution, especially of gold and silver, in associated seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits are strongly influenced by variable source rocks, fluid chemistry, and precipitation mechanisms. Compositional data of 130 SMS deposits around the world show a large range of gold and silver grades, in part reflecting strong buffering of the hydrothermal fluids by their host rocks. Geochemical reaction-path modeling shows that in most cases the investigated hydrothermal fluids are undersaturated with gold and silver, and solubilities can be orders of magnitude higher than the Au and Ag concentrations measured in the corresponding fluids. Precipitation of gold during conductive cooling of mid-ocean ridge black smoker (MOR) fluids occurs at low temperatures but can be very rapid, with > 90% of the gold deposited in the first 25 °C of cooling below ~ 150 °C. The result is a Zn–Au polymetallic assemblage with Au and Ag deposited at the same time together with Pb and sulfosalts. In ultramafic-dominated (UM) systems, the strongly reduced hydrothermal fluids promote the deposition of gold at higher temperatures and explain the correlation between gold and copper in these deposits. In this case, the lower stability of the AuHS° complex at low ƒO2 (buffered by fayalite, magnetite, and quartz) results in gold deposition at > 250 °C with early bornite and chalcopyrite and before sphalerite and silver, producing a high-temperature Cu–Au assemblage. In sediment-hosted (SED) systems, the much higher pH stabilizes Au(HS)2− and keeps gold in solution to very low temperatures, after the precipitation of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, and galena, resulting in Au-poor polymetallic sulfides and very late-stage deposition of gold, commonly with amorphous silica. In arc-related (ARC) systems, gold deposition occurs at somewhat higher temperatures than in the MOR case, in part because the fluids start with higher gold concentrations. This can be explained by probable direct magmatic contributions, and the high ƒO2 of the fluids, which promotes the solubility of gold at the source. During cooling, gold precipitates at about 160 °C with sphalerite, tennantite, silver, and galena, resulting in an Au-rich polymetallic sulfide assemblage. The mixing of hydrothermal fluids with seawater generally causes oxidation and eventually a decrease in the pH at a mixing ratio of 1:1, causing an initial increase in the solubility of gold and silver. This can delay gold deposition from aqueous species to very low temperatures. These complex systematics make prediction of Au and Ag grades difficult. However, important new data are coming to light on the actual concentrations of the precious metals in hydrothermal fluids. In particular, the input of magmatic volatiles and leaching of pre-existing gold can lead to significant increases in the Au and Ag concentrations of the venting fluids and earlier deposition. In several cases, it appears that at least part of the gold load is present as nanoparticles in suspension, allowing bulk gold concentrations that may be far in excess of liquid saturation. Boiling at the seafloor is now widely observed, even at great water depths close to the critical point of seawater. Model calculations of phase separation during boiling show the competing effects on gold solubility of H2, H2S, and CO2 partitioning into the vapor, which can result in highly variable gold-to-base metal ratios in the deposits. Flashing of the vent fluids into steam at high temperatures is also commonly observed and can lead to spectacular Au grades, with a strong Cu–Au association in the deepest and hottest vents.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The controls on the gold enrichment in volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits have been a persistent theme in ore deposits research for more than 30 years. A major motivation is that gold production from massive sulfide deposits accounts for a significant portion of their metal value; some deposits are world-class gold mines containing more than 100 t Au (Mercier-Langevin et al. 2011). The main geological characteristics of gold-rich VMS deposits have been extensively reviewed (Hannington et al. 1986, 1999; Hannington and Scott 1989a, b; Large et al. 1989; Large 1992; Poulsen and Hannington 1996; Sillitoe et al. 1996; Huston 2000; Dubé et al. 2007; Mercier-Langevin et al. 2011). From these studies, it is clear that highly variable amounts of Au may be found in different systems, both in terms of grade and total Au content. Some resemble hybrid VMS-epithermal systems (e.g., Eskay Creek), whereas others are characterized by alteration and/or sulfide mineral assemblages that indicate a direct magmatic contribution to the hydrothermal fluids (e.g., Boliden). Typically, when gold is present, a plausible explanation for the enrichment can be advanced. However, it is important to note that many deposits contain virtually no detectable gold at all, the absence of which is often difficult to explain when similar deposits nearby are well-endowed. Highly variable grades are the expression of the intricate system dynamics affecting the hydrothermal fluids, including conductive cooling, subsurface entrainment of seawater, leaching of pre-existing Au, phase separation, and inputs of magmatic volatiles (Hannington et al. 1995, 2017). Several or even all of these factors may contribute to gold enrichment at a variety of different scales, from an individual sulfide chimney to an entire VMS district.
Since the discovery of the first hydrothermal vents at the Galapagos Rift in 1977 (Lonsdale 1977) and black smokers at East Pacific Rise a few years later (Francheteau et al. 1979; Spiess et al. 1980; Hekinian et al. 1983), more than 600 active and inactive hydrothermal sites have been found in the world’s oceans. More than 300 are associated with significant base metal–sulfide mineralization (Baker and German 2004; Hannington et al. 2005, 2010; Beaulieu et al. 2013; Monecke et al. 2016). Bulk analyses of recovered massive sulfide samples (n = 3885) have average grades of 4.3 wt% Cu, 10.6 wt% Zn, 0.1 wt% Pb, 1.7 ppm Au, and 107 ppm Ag, which are comparable to massive sulfide deposits mined on land (Franklin et al. 2005; Hannington et al. 2010). High Au and Ag grades have been documented in samples from deposits in a wide range of geological settings. Early studies (Hannington and Scott 1989a; Huston and Large 1989) showed that cooling of high-temperature hydrothermal fluids and mixing with seawater are fundamental controls on the precipitation of gold and associated silver. At high temperatures (e.g., ~ 350 °C in black smoker vents), substantial amounts of the dissolved Au were thought to be carried out of the system and lost to hydrothermal plumes (Hannington and Scott 1989a; Herzig and Hannington 1995). Initially, the strong Cu–Au association observed in many ancient massive sulfide deposits (Huston et al. 2011) was not recognized in black smokers. However, continuing efforts to document different types of seafloor hydrothermal have provided new clues to the causes of Au enrichment, with important implications for exploration in ancient VMS systems.
In this study, we explore how different source rocks and buffer assemblages can account for significant variability in the geochemical behavior of Au in various settings. Geochemical reaction-path modeling is used to assess Au enrichment in (i) basalt-hosted systems at mid-ocean ridges, (ii) ultramafic rock-hosted systems, (iii) sediment-dominated systems, and (iv) arc-related systems including at intraoceanic arc volcanoes and transitional arcs and back-arc spreading centers. We compare a comprehensive geochemical dataset of seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) deposits around the world with the physicochemical conditions of hydrothermal transport and deposition of precious metals in each of these settings.
Gold and silver concentrations in seafloor massive sulfides deposits
Median grades of Au and Ag in 130 occurrences of seafloor massive sulfides worldwide are listed in Table 1. The database derives from an extensive compilation originally published in 2004 (Hannington et al. 2004) and updated with results from 57 additional publications (references cited in ESM 1). The locations of the deposits and the ranges of Au and Ag grades are shown in Fig. 1a, b. The different types of deposits are classified according to their volcanic substrates, including mid-ocean ridge basalt, ultramafic intrusive rocks, and more evolved volcanic suites in both oceanic and continental crust. These differences have been reviewed comprehensively in Hannington et al. (2005) and are summarized below. The range of Au and Ag concentrations in the deposits (Fig. 2) reflects a number of different factors, but it is clear that the geological setting and volcanic substrate are major underlying controls in all cases.
Basalt-hosted deposits on the mid-ocean ridges are mainly discriminated on the basis of spreading rate, which varies in response to regional tectonic stresses and rates of magma supply. Fast-spreading ridges (full spreading rates of 6–14 cm/year) occur in relatively thin oceanic crust and are characterized by abundant volcanic eruptions; intermediate-rate (4–6 cm/year) and slow-spreading (2–4 cm/year) ridges occur in relatively thick crust and are characterized by only intermittent volcanism between long periods of tectonic extension and/or intrusive activity. Most ridges are dominated by normal mid-ocean ridge basalt (N-MORB), but some intermediate spreading centers have more evolved magma compositions (ferrobasalt and andesite), which may be related to magma mixing, fractional crystallization at shallow to intermediate crustal depths, or assimilation of hydrated crust (Perfit et al. 1999). At slow-spreading ridges, which have a low melt supply, the crust is composed mainly of gabbroic intrusions, and locally, ultramafic rocks are exposed. These differences in volcanic substrate have a subtle but important influence on the compositions of the hydrothermal fluids and the behavior of Au. The presence of sediments also has a large effect on the compositions of the vent fluids.
Subduction-related hydrothermal systems are of two main types: vents found in the summit calderas of submarine volcanoes at the volcanic fronts of arcs and those associated with arc rifting and back-arc spreading. The volcanic arcs include both intraoceanic and “transitional” or island arcs. Intraoceanic arcs are developed mainly on a basement of oceanic crust, and the volcanism is typically basaltic, becoming more andesitic and calc-alkaline as the arc crust thickens. The magmas are mainly products of partial melting caused by the addition of H2O and other volatiles to the subarc mantle from subducted sediments and hydrated oceanic crust. Typical island-arc basalt (IAB) differs from MORB by having higher H2O and CO2 contents, higher Fe2O3/FeO, and enrichments in certain elements, notably large-ion-lithophile elements, such as Ca, Ba, Cs, K, Rb, and Sr. Vent fluid compositions are broadly similar to those at mid-ocean ridges, but the arc magmas supply a number of different components to the hydrothermal fluids, including possibly the precious metals. Transitional arcs are developed on older arc crust and, in some cases, on young continental crust, which can also provide additional metals. Felsic volcanic rocks are common in these settings, resulting from partial melting and/or fractional crystallization of magmas trapped in the thickened arc crust or continental crust. The majority of the known high-temperature vents in the western Pacific occur at intraoceanic back-arc spreading centers, which develop after a prolonged episode of arc rifting, caused by trenchward migration and sinking of the subducting plate, followed by passive upwelling of mantle material. Back-arc basin basalts, or BABB, like arc magmas, are enriched in volatiles and incompatible elements but are transitional between MORB and arc basalt. BABB is generated by the extension (depressurization)-induced partial melting of a mantle wedge, which has been previously metasomatized by volatiles from a subduction slab (e.g., Pearce et al. 1995). Intracontinental rifts are also important settings for ancient VMS (Hannington et al. 2005), but only one seafloor hydrothermal system is known in an intracontinental rift setting, in the Atlantis II Deep of the Red Sea (Table 1 and Fig. 1).
Gold and Ag concentrations in samples from these different settings span several orders of magnitude, from 0.001 to 43 g/t Au and 0.4 to 4900 g/t Ag. Basalt-hosted and ultramafic rock-hosted massive sulfide deposits located at mid-ocean ridges (e.g., Mid-Atlantic Ridge, East-Pacific Rise, Galapagos Rift) have Au and Ag grades with median values of 0.29 and 2.78, respectively, with some exceptions where they reach grades that exceed 8 g/t Au and 90 g/t Ag (Fig. 2). Deposits at sediment-covered mid-ocean ridges have low grades, generally less than 0.1 g/t Au and 8 g/t Ag. In contrast, SMS located in arc-related rift systems, including the oceanic arcs, transitional arcs, and mature back-arc basins, are characterized by much higher grades. The richest deposits have median grades that exceed 10 g/t Au (in the 10th percentile: Fig. 3a) and are all found in transitional arc and back-arc settings (Table 1 and Fig. 1a). These deposits are located on the Izu-Bonin arc (43 g/t Au at the Suiyo Seamount), in the Mariana back-arc (13.3 g/t Au at the Forecast vent field), in the Manus Basin (15.2 g/t Au at Solwara 9; 12.8 g/t and 10.4 g/t Au at Solwara 6 and 8, respectively; 10 g/t Au at the Pacmanus Site; 10.6 g/t Au and 31 g/t Au, respectively, at Solwara 2 and 3 in the Vienna Woods Area), in the Western Woodlark Basin (12.4 g/t Au at Franklin Seamount), and in the Lau Basin (16.3 g/t Au at Fonualei Rift, FRSC-2; 13.9 g/t Au at the MTJ Caldera site; 12.9 g/t Au at Tahi Moana-4; 14.2 g/t Au at Tahi Moana-5). Deposits with median Ag grades in the top 10% (more than 280 g/t Ag: Fig. 3b) are also in arc and back-arc settings: on the Izu-Bonin arc (322 g/t Ag at the Suiyo Seamount), in the Manus Basin (370 g/t Ag at Solwara 2, 1115 g/t Ag at Solwara 3, 284 g/t Ag at Solwara 9, and 452 g/t Ag at Solwara 12), on the Mariana arc (282 g/t Ag at the Forecast vent field), and in the Lau Basin (504 g/t Ag at Fonualei Rift, FRSC-2; 509 g/t Ag and 646 g/t Ag at Tahi Moana-4 and Tahi Moana-5, respectively). The highest Ag grades are found in deposits underlain by continental crust in the Okinawa Trough (4900 g/t Ag at Hakurei; 600 g/t Ag at JADE; 500 g/t Ag at North Knoll).
Caution is needed when interpreting the reported Au and Ag grades because of the highly variable sample populations, which range from dredged samples with poorly constrained locations, multiple samples from the same location (e.g., an individual chimney complex), and comprehensive sample collections of entire areas or deposits, including active and inactive parts (e.g., Petersen et al. 2016). The majority of the analyses are of dredged samples from sulfide mounds, debris, and especially active chimneys collected during sampling of high-temperature fluids. Evidence of a sampling bias is seen in a number of examples. For example, the spectacular Ag grades reported for the Hakurei deposit in the Okinawa Trough (4900 ppm Ag) are the result of analyses of multiple subsamples from a single Ag-rich chimney, while most of the other chimneys recovered from the deposit have grades of only a few hundred parts per million (Table 1). Data from drilling of the TAG, Snakepit, Middle Valley (Bent Hill and ODP mound) and Solwara 1 deposits (Table 2) also shows significant variability in grades between the interior of a deposit and samples from the surface. All of the drilled deposits show similar trends of Au and Ag enrichments at or near the surface and depletion in the interior. Thus, reported grades from most seafloor deposits that have not been drilled cannot be compared with reserves and resources reported for well-characterized land-based mineral deposits. Only two large Au-rich deposits, in terms of size and tonnage, are presently known among the volcanic-hosted SMS occurrences: the Solwara 1 deposit in the Eastern Manus Basin and the Hakurei deposit in the Okinawa Trough, which could contain between 10 and 15 t Au, respectively (Nautilus Minerals Inc. 2012; JOGMEC 2016). The largest accumulation of Au on the modern seafloor is in the metalliferous muds of the Atlantis II Deep, which are estimated to contain ~ 45 t of Au (Laurila et al. 2015). In most cases, however, it is not possible to make direct comparisons of metal content with land-based deposits owing to the nature of the sampling and the methods of reporting mine production.
Precious metal associations and processes of enrichment
Gold and silver are associated with a wide range of different sulfide mineral assemblages in SMS deposits in both mid-ocean ridge systems and arc or back-arc systems. They include Cu–Au-rich chimneys in the calderas of arc-front volcanoes (Sunrise, Brothers); large Cu–Zn deposits in early-stage arc rifts (Solwara 1 deposit in the Eastern Manus Basin); polymetallic Zn-Cu-Pb deposits at rifted continental margins (Hakurei deposit in the Okinawa Trough); ultramafic rock-hosted Cu–Au mineralization at slow-spreading mid-ocean ridges (Logatchev, Semyenov, Ashadze deposits on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge); deposits that have been strongly enriched by zone refinement (TAG, MIR, and Alvin zones at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge); in relatively shallow submarine hydrothermal systems affected by boiling (including both Cu- and Zn-rich chimneys: Axial Seamount on the Juan de Fuca Ridge); and in at least one large-tonnage, low grade brine-pool deposit in Atlantis II Deep of the Red Sea (Table 3) (Hannington et al. 1986, 1991a; Hannington and Scott 1988, 1989a, b; Herzig and Hannington 1990; Petersen et al. 2002). The different styles of mineralization reflect very different conditions and processes of Au and Ag enrichment. The two principal geochemical associations recognized in ancient massive sulfide deposits, Cu–Au and Zn–Au (Huston et al. 2011), are also evident in the global data for SMS (Fig. 4a). The data for Ag are shown in Fig. 4b. In many deposits, a strong Zn–Au association has been attributed to mixing and cooling of the hydrothermal fluids causing deposition of gold at low temperatures (e.g., < 250 °C), typical of white smoker chimneys (Hannington and Scott 1989a). However, temperature, which is the main influence on Cu-rich versus Zn-rich mineralization, cannot be the only control on Au enrichment, because high concentrations of Au are found in both assemblages. This distinctly bimodal distribution is illustrated in Fig. 5, which shows the wide range of Au concentrations in different Cu-rich and Zn-rich sulfides from deposits in the Eastern Manus Basin. In this case, there is no correlation between the absolute Au grade and the particular Cu–Au or Zn–Au association. Another major influence on the distribution of precious metals is the process of hydrothermal reworking or “zone-refining,” originally described by Barton Jr (1978) and adapted to the Kuroko deposits by Eldridge et al. (1983). It involves the continuous dissolution and reprecipitation of early-formed minerals by the flow of high-temperature fluids through the deposit, resulting in the common enrichment of Au and Ag with Zn at the cooler outer margins (Hannington et al. 1998). These Zn–Au assemblages also commonly have anomalous trace element geochemistry, including co-enrichments of the epithermal suite (Ag, As, Sb, Hg).
A number of different processes have been advanced to explain the Cu–Au association. Notable co-enrichment of Cu and Au has been found in black smoker chimneys from volcanic arcs, such as 10–20 g/t Au in Cu-rich chimneys from Suiyo Seamount on the Izu-Bonin arc and in the deposits in the eastern Manus Basin (Tsunogai et al. 1994; Watanabe and Kajimura 1994; Moss and Scott 2001). The concentrations of Au are orders of magnitude higher than in similarly Cu-rich black smokers from the mid-ocean ridges, suggesting that Au concentrations in the vent fluids must be much higher. The most common interpretation is that the Au is sourced from magmatic volatiles and deposited mostly in high-temperature Cu-rich chimneys, but there may be relatively little accumulation of massive sulfide (Dekov and Savelli 2004; Törmänen and Koski 2005; Melekestseva et al. 2010, 2017; Berkenbosch et al. 2012; Iizasa et al. 2018). Other trace elements, such as Bi and Te, show covariations with Au enrichment in these chimneys, reaching concentrations of up to 200 ppm Bi and 150 ppm Te (Watanabe and Kajimura 1994; Moss and Scott 2001). The Cu–Au–Bi–Te association may reflect a felsic magmatic source for the metals, similar to that observed in subaerial magmatic hydrothermal systems (Hannington et al. 2005). Discrete Bi telluride minerals also have been documented in massive sulfides at Brothers, Palinuro Seamount, and in deposits on the Izu-Bonin arc (Dekov and Savelli 2004; Törmänen and Koski 2005; Melekestseva et al. 2010, 2017; Berkenbosch et al. 2012; Iizasa et al. 2018). The most Au-rich samples also include complex mineral assemblages including abundant bornite, tennantite, or other sulfosalts. The latter commonly include distinctive high-sulfidation minerals, such as the enargite–luzonite in the Eastern Manus Basin (Petersen et al. 2002; Dekov and Savelli 2004; Törmänen and Koski 2005; Melekestseva et al. 2010, 2017; Berkenbosch et al. 2012; Iizasa et al. 2018). However, normal mid-ocean ridge black smokers, which can also be Au-rich, typically do not show any of these trace element enrichments or high-sulfidation minerals, implying that other processes may also account for the Cu–Au association.
The different trace element associations with Au and Ag reflect a combination of the conditions of mineralization and the source rocks. In particular, hydrothermal fluids in mafic- or ultramafic rock-dominated settings are enriched in metals such as Cu, Fe, Co, Se, and Ni, whereas volcanic arc and back-arc settings are enriched metals such as Pb, As, Sb, and Ag (Hannington et al. 2005). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) calculated for these elements (Fig. 1 in ESM 2) show two groups that are positively correlated with Au: (1) highly mobile epithermal elements (Ag, As, Sb, Hg, Tl, Cd) typical of low-temperature Zn-rich assemblages and (2) other trace elements (In, Ga, Ge) that are found in higher-temperature Cu-rich assemblages. The range of concentrations of a number of these elements in samples from deposits in different settings is illustrated in Fig. 6. The source rocks control, possible direct magmatic contributions, and temperature-dependent solubilities that influence the transport and deposition of the trace elements have been reviewed by Monecke et al. (2016).
Precious metal mineralogy
Although exceptional Au and Ag concentrations can be found in many deposits, discrete gold and silver minerals or their alloys are rarely observed (reported in only 18 deposits: Table 4). In a few case where native gold and silver are observed, a close paragenetic relationship exists between As- and Sb-bearing sulfosalts and the native gold has been noted (e.g., Hannington et al. 1991b, 1995; Petersen et al. 2002), which has been attributed by previous workers to co-precipitation at relatively low temperatures. Tennantite [(Cu, Ag, Zn, Fe)12As4S13] and tetrahedrite [(Cu, Fe, Ag, Zn)12Sb4S13] are the most common sulfosalts (e.g., Monecke et al. 2016). Native gold (commonly of high purity) and Ag-poor electrum are found in some deposits at mid-ocean ridges, including sites with mainly ultramafic footwalls, but native Ag is rarely observed. Most Ag is present in Ag-bearing sulfosalts, such as tetrahedrite. In the ultramafic-hosted Logatchev deposit, native gold has been found in association with chalcopyrite, bornite, and covellite (Murphy and Meyer 1998; Moss and Scott 2001), whereas in the Beebe hydrothermal field, native gold has been found with pyrrhotite and iron oxides but rarely with chalcopyrite (Webber et al. 2017). Native gold has also been reported in opaline silica from the basalt-hosted Semyenov-2 hydrothermal field (Melekestseva et al. 2010, 2017). Abundant Au-rich electrum has been found in hydrothermally reworked sulfides from the TAG hydrothermal field from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (Hannington et al. 1995). Grain coarsening appears to be an important process during hydrothermal reworking, as suggested by Hannington et al. (1995), explaining the large grain sizes (up to 10 μm) and the high-fineness of the gold in sphalerite veins cutting the massive sulfides. Some native gold in the TAG deposit is interpreted to be enriched together with Cu in secondary digenite, covellite, and bornite by supergene alteration processes (Hannington et al. 1988).
Native gold, electrum (> 20 wt.% Ag) and Ag-bearing sulfosalts are more common in arc and back-arc settings (seven deposits, Table 4). These have been reported in sphalerite-rich massive sulfides from the Lau Basin (Herzig et al. 1993), in Cu-rich sulfides in chalcopyrite and bornite in the Manus Basin (Moss and Scott 2001; Ihle et al. 2005), Ba–Zn–Pb-rich sulfides from the Okinawa Trough (Halbach et al. 1993), and in the barite–silica chimneys at Franklin Seamount in the Woodlark Basin (Binns et al. 1997). Chalcopyrite from a chimney interior sampled at the Brothers volcano contains distinct bands, ~ 50–200 μm wide, that have Au contents exceeding 300 ppm, and in a single spot (~ 50 μm2) up to 1.55 wt% (Berkenbosch et al. 2012). Elsewhere, Ag-rich electrum and Ag-bearing sulfosalts have been found in siliceous vein networks resembling epithermal-style mineralization, such as at Conical Seamount, an alkaline volcano offshore from the giant Ladolam gold deposit on Lihir Island, PNG (Petersen et al. 2002). In the Higashi-Aogashima hydrothermal field, unusually large gold crystals (up the 150 μm length) have been identified in amorphous silica, and smaller gold particles have been found in sulfidic sediments, which were interpreted as “fallout” from hydrothermal plumes (Iizasa et al. 2018).
A number of different mechanisms have been proposed for the direct precipitation of gold in sulfide chimneys. Hannington et al. 1986, Hannington and Scott 1989a, Hannington et al. 1991b) recognized the importance of direct precipitation of gold in diffuse hydrothermal vents, in which mixing with seawater played an important role in the cooling and oxidation of the fluids. More recently, Webber et al. (2017) proposed entrapment of gold nanoparticles by diffuse flow through black smoker “beehive chimneys” in the Beebe hydrothermal field. Craddock (2009) suggested a similar mechanism for gold deposition in low-temperature, white smoker “diffusers” in the Eastern Manus Basin. In both cases, the large surface area of the minerals in the beehive-type chimneys was considered to be crucial for the trapping of gold particles. Yang and Scott (2006) suggested a process of direct precipitation of gold in massive sulfide chimneys at the Pacmanus site from magmatic volatiles that degassed through submarine volcanic eruptions and/or mixed into the seafloor hydrothermal systems. Others have suggested that precious metal deposition may be bacterially mediated (Zierenberg and Schiffman 1990). And, in the metalliferous muds of the Atlantis II Deep, gold is thought to occur mainly in ultrafine arsenian pyrite, as well as adsorbed onto clay minerals from Au-enriched pore fluids (Laurila et al. 2015).
Tellurides that contain Au and Ag, such as calaverite and hessite, and especially Bi–tellurides and sulfides in association with gold, have been reported from deposits in the summit calderas of several arc volcanoes (e.g., Monecke et al. 2016). The occurrence of specular hematite and Au– and Bi–tellurides in chalcopyrite from the Brothers volcano are consistent with direct magmatic contributions at this site (Berkenbosch et al. 2012). However, discrete Bi and Te minerals also have been documented in Au-bearing massive sulfides at Semyenov-2 and in the Escanaba Trough, indicating that co-enrichments of Au, Bi, and Te are not exclusively associated with felsic magmatic sources as previously noted by many authors. Törmänen and Koski (2005) proposed that traces of Au in the sulfide chimneys at Escanaba Trough were deposited because of their strong affinity to Bi metal, forming the Au–Bi alloy, maldonite.
Gold and Ag are widely reported as trace constituents of sulfide minerals, either as solid solution in the host crystals or as submicroscopic inclusions, especially in chalcopyrite, pyrite, isocubanite, sphalerite, chalcocite, and covellite (Melekestseva et al. 2014, 2017; Wohlgemuth-Ueberwasser et al. 2015; Keith et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2017).
Sources of gold and gold-bearing hydrothermal fluids
Leaching of primary sulfides and the destruction of ferromagnesian minerals in basalt are the major sources of metals and sulfur in mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems (Hannington et al. 2005). Black smoker fluids at mid-ocean ridges have in situ pH values from of 4 to 5, salinities of < 1 to 8 wt% NaCl equivalent (avg. 3.5, close to seawater), CO2 concentrations of < 5 to 285 mmol (avg. 40), H2S concentrations of < 0.1 to 41 mmol (avg. 7.3), H2 concentrations of < 0.1 to 1.8 mmol (avg. 0.2), and total metal contents of < 10 to 1300 ppm (avg. 290) (Hannington et al. 2005). The narrow range of H2 and H2S concentrations reflects equilibrium with a buffer assemblage including immiscible sulfides and Fe-bearing olivine in the most reduced systems and a greenschist alteration assemblage of pyrite–magnetite–anhydrite–calcic plagioclase–epidote in the most oxidized systems (Seyfried Jr et al. 1991; Seyfried Jr and Ding 1995). Dissolved sulfur concentrations are almost always in excess of dissolved metals. In ultramafic rocks, a number of different reactions can lead to low pH and metal-rich fluids, or alternatively high-pH and metal-depleted fluids over a wide range of temperatures (Wetzel and Shock 2000; Allen and Seyfried Jr 2003). High concentrations of H2 that can reach up to 16 mmol are produced by serpentinization reactions through oxidation of ferrous iron in olivine:
Abundant CH4 is also produced during serpentinization, through a series of Fisher–Tropsch-like reactions that convert carbon dioxide to CH4 (Kelley and Früh-Green 1999; Früh-Green et al. 2004). In sediment-dominated environments, the fluids are often depleted in metals and enriched in the alkalies, ammonia, and organic-derived hydrocarbons relative to seawater–basalt systems. Chemical buffering by the sediment results in generally higher pH and more reduced hydrothermal fluids. Pyrrhotite tends to be the dominant Fe-sulfide phase, and other minerals formed at low ƒO2 (e.g., Fe-rich sphalerite: Barton and Toulmin 1966) are commonly present. The lower venting temperatures compared to sediment-free mid-ocean ridges (e.g., 317 °C in the Guaymas Basin; 276 °C at Middle Valley; 217 °C in the Escanaba Trough) and the higher pH account for the lower metal concentrations at the sea floor.
The major controls on vent fluid compositions in arc and back-arc settings are the same as those at mid-ocean ridges, but there is evidence that magmatic volatiles supply a number of components, including metals, to the hydrothermal fluids (Hannington et al. 1995). End-member fluids commonly have higher concentrations of K and other alkali elements, reflecting the composition of the volcanic rocks, and they tend to be more oxidized because of the lower abundance of FeO-bearing minerals. Early observations of Au enrichment in the associated deposits could not be accounted for by differences in the Au contents of the source rocks and were mainly interpreted to reflect the oxidation state of the fluids (Herzig et al. 1993; Herzig and Hannington 1995). However, the role of magmatic volatiles in the enrichment of Au is now generally accepted, and the presence of isotopically distinct fluids in some anomalously Au-rich systems provides positive evidence for a direct magmatic contribution. For example, high concentrations of Cu, Fe, and Zn chlorides in a fluid phase co-existing with melt inclusions in andesite from the Eastern Manus Basin support the suggestion that metals may be contributed directly from the magma (Yang and Scott 1996; Kamenetsky et al. 2001; Yang and Scott 2002).
Sampling black smoker fluids has produced a large dataset of several hundreds of analyses (German and Von Damm 2004). Yet, after more than three decades, only a few analyses of Au have been reported from just 10 locations, mostly within the last 6 years. This is partly because of the difficulty analyzing trace quantities of Au in the fluids, requiring difficult preconcentration techniques, but these difficulties have mostly been overcome. Early estimates based on analyses of the quenched products of high-temperature black smokers indicated Au concentrations in the end-member fluids of 0.05 to 0.2 ppb (Hannington and Scott 1989a; Hannington et al. 1991a). Average value of 0.08 ppb Au used in this study is based on six references from mid-ocean ridge vents: 0.2 ppb Au from 21N EPR black smoker fluids (Campbell et al. 1987), 0.1 ppb Au from the combined analysis of vent fluids and filtered particulates at Southern Explorer Ridge (Hall et al. 1988), 0.06 and 0.1 ppb Au from analyses of quenched products of high-temperature vents from 21N and 11N EPR (Hannington and Scott 1989a; Hannington et al. 1991a), and 0.05 ppb and 0.0074 ppb Au in two samples from the Hanging Gardens vent at 21N EPR (Falkner and Edmond 1990). The numbers were so low that many researchers considered it not worth the effort to pursue additional analyses. Then, gold concentrations in vent fluids from the Eastern Manus Basin and the Tonga arc were measured in the range of 0.6 to 1 ppb (Table 5) a factor of 5× to 10× the MOR values (Craddock 2009; Gartman et al. 2018). These results seemed consistent with a probable felsic magmatic contribution to the hydrothermal fluids and were close to the reported concentrations of Au in land-based magmatic–hydrothermal systems, such as Broadlands and White Island (Simmons et al. 2016). But, the measured values were still much lower than in Au-rich magmatic fluids found in deep drill holes, for example, at Lihir (Simmons and Brown (2006): Table 5). In 2007, Hardardóttir et al. (2009) sampled the deep fluids at Reykjanes on Iceland, a seawater-dominated, basalt-hosted geothermal system on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Au concentrations in fluids collected below the boiling zone, at depths of 1500 m, averaged 3 ppb (up to 6 ppb). That experiment was repeated 7 years later, and Au concentrations in the same wells to 1650 m depth averaged 14.3 ppb Au (up to 21 ppb: Hannington et al. (2016)), more than 2 orders of magnitude higher than the value for mid-ocean ridge black smoker fluids.
Considerable effort has gone into detecting parts per billion-level (and even sub-ppb) variations in the host rocks to try to explain the enrichment of Au in some systems. However, the reported range of Au concentrations in MORB, both bulk rock and glasses, is less than 1 up to 5 ppb (Table 6). Ultramafic rocks have somewhat higher concentrations up to 8 ppb (Table 6), and immiscible sulfides and mafic minerals could be an important source of Cu and Au for deposits in these settings (Pitcairn 2013; German et al. 2016). However, these differences do not appear to be large enough to account for the 2 to 3 orders of magnitude variation in the Au contents of the deposits. Webber et al. (2013) argued that substantial gold enrichment of oceanic crust during ridge–plume interaction could be a source for Au-rich SMS deposits. However, there are too few examples of deposits occurring where plumes impinge on MOR settings (Axial, Lucky Strike, Menez Gwen: Table 1) to say anything about the possibility that increased mantle melting at these locations has contributed to gold enrichment. High concentrations of Au have been reported in unaltered volcanic glass and glassy volcanic rocks from the Eastern Manus Basin, from < 1 to 15 ppb with an average of 6 ppb (Moss and Scott 2001). Similar concentrations have been found in volcanic rocks from the arc front (Jenner et al. 2012; Park et al. 2015; Portnyagin et al. 2015: Table 6).
The low Au concentrations of sulfide deposits on sedimented ridges suggest generally low Au concentrations in the hydrothermal fluids, although these have never been measured. The metalliferous brines of the Red Sea may be an important exception, owing to the extremely high salinity originating from the dissolution of Miocene evaporite and reactions with a number of different rocks, including basalt and marine shale (Zierenberg and Shanks III 1986; Anschutz and Blanc 1995; Anschutz et al. 1995). Mass balance calculations for the brine pool suggest an end-member Au concentration in the brines of 0.26 ppb (Laurila et al. 2015), close to that of hydrothermal brines from the Salton Sea (Table 5).
Gold and silver solubility
To examine the behavior of Au and Ag in different seafloor hydrothermal systems, we used the geochemical modeling software Geochemist’s Workbench 12® (Bethke 2008). The aqueous and mineral species in the most recent version of the SUPCRT92 database (Johnson et al. 1992; Shock et al. 1997; Sverjensky et al. 1997) were entirely integrated into Geochemist’s Workbench (GWB), using the software tool DBCreate (Kong et al. 2013), which generates the required file of equilibrium constants for GWB from the native format in SUPCRT92. The derived database was modified and extended by adding newer data for the aqueous and mineral species, especially for Au and Ag, from Akinfiev and Zotov (2001, 2010) and Pokrovski et al. (2014) (Table 1 in ESM 2). The B-dot equation, an extension of the Debye–Hückel equation (Helgeson 1969), was used to calculate activity coefficients for charged aqueous species. An activity coefficient of one was assumed for neutral aqueous species, except nonpolar species for which calculated activity coefficients were used (Drummond and Ohmoto 1985).
Calculated solubilities of Au and Ag for different aqueous complexes of the metals in the end-member fluids are shown in Fig. 7, under different buffer conditions corresponding to the range of volcanic and tectonic settings studied here: basalt-dominated mid-ocean ridges (MOR), ultramafic-dominated mid-ocean ridges (UM), volcanic arc and back-arc (ARC) settings, and sediment-dominated mid-ocean ridges (SED). The end-member fluid chemistry in each case is strongly influenced by the mineral assemblages present in the rocks, which largely control the H2 and H2S activity. Fluids in ultramafic rock-dominated environments (UM) achieve highly reduced conditions close to the fayalite–magnetite–quartz (FMQ) buffer (Fig. 7a). In basalt-dominated MOR systems, the hydrothermal fluids are more oxidized, consistent with pyrite–pyrrhotite–magnetite (PPM) equilibrium (Fig. 7a). The highest oxidation states are achieved by reaction with a “greenschist” mineral assemblage containing plagioclase, epidote, quartz, magnetite, anhydrite, and pyrite (PEQMAP buffer) as proposed by Seyfried Jr et al. (1999) and Seyfried and Ding (1995) (Fig. 7a):
Modeled fluids in MOR systems range from reducing, with log H2 activities as low as − 1.5, to less reducing, with log H2 activities of − 3.5, and with equilibrium log H2S activities in the range of − 1.25 to − 1.75. In arc-related (ARC) systems, where water reacts with volcanic rocks having even lower abundances of Fe-bearing minerals, the end-member hydrothermal fluids are typically more oxidized and approach hematite–magnetite–pyrite (HMP) equilibrium (Fig. 7a).
Figure 7b shows the fields of predominance for chloride, bisulfide, and hydroxide aqueous species of Au under conditions where these different fluids develop. In hydrothermal fluids with low pH (< 5), AuCl2− is the dominant aqueous Au species. At intermediate pH (from 5 to 6.5), AuHS° is dominant; at the highest pH (> 6.5), Au(HS)2− is the dominant Au species. Fluids typical of ARC environments have the highest potential to carry Au, in the range of several parts per billion up to 100 ppb, whereas the solubility of gold is progressively lower in fluids from MOR, UM, and SED settings. Under the modeled conditions, it is clear that most of the seafloor hydrothermal fluids for which Au analyses are available (Table 5) would be undersaturated with gold. Figure 7c shows the results for silver. AgCl2− is the dominant aqueous Ag species in all of the modeled fluids, with maximum solubility at the lowest pH and highest oxidation states. Similar to the case of gold, all of the analyzed vent fluids are undersaturated with silver, and fluids typical of ARC environments are able to dissolve several hundreds to thousands of parts per million. The maximum possible Au and Ag solubilities for different rock buffers are plotted as functions of the fluid temperature and pH in Fig. 8. Under reservoir conditions (pH = 4 to 6, 400 °C), the solubility of gold for the different buffers can span at least 1 order of magnitude (10 to 100 ppb, all species); the solubility of silver has a slightly smaller range (50 to 400 ppm, all species). Hydrothermal fluids that are buffered by crustal rocks (e.g., HMP buffer) have the greatest capacity to transport Au and Ag.
Reaction-path modeling of gold precipitation
To investigate processes leading to the deposition of gold in different Au-rich mineral assemblages, we consider the behavior of aqueous Au complexes in a range of hydrothermal fluids equilibrated with different buffer assemblages and conditions of mineralization. A number of tools exist to model gold precipitation from dilute hydrothermal fluids. Reed (1982) first developed the CHILLER program, with aqueous speciation derived from SOLVEQ, to calculate heterogeneous equilibrium in cooling hydrothermal fluids and during mixing (Reed and Spycher 1984; Reed and Spycher 1985; Reed 1998; Reed and Palandri 2006). Several attempts have been made to model gold precipitation from seafloor hydrothermal fluids using GWB. In almost all cases, gold (and silver) precipitate at very low temperatures, owing to the high solubilities in the modeled fluids and the low Au concentrations assumed for the end-members. Most recently, Webber et al. (2017) used GWB to model precipitation of gold in the Beebe hydrothermal field under conditions buffered by pyrite–pyrrhotite equilibrium and assuming an end-member concentration of 0.1 ppb Au. Gold saturation in their models occurred at 140 °C for conductive cooling and at 125 °C for mixing. In models where the fluid was not buffered, gold did not precipitate until temperatures reached 30–40 °C. These results are inconsistent with the observed enrichment of Au in polymetallic Zn-rich and Cu-rich assemblages typically formed at much higher temperatures. New data from a number of different seafloor hydrothermal systems suggest that Au concentrations in some end-member fluids may be significantly higher than previously thought (Table 5), allowing for gold precipitation at much higher temperatures.
In this study, two types of reaction paths were calculated using the REACT module of GWB: (i) conductive cooling and (ii) hydrothermal fluid–seawater mixing. Representative vent fluid compositions from each of the four buffer assemblages were modeled (Table 2 in ESM 2). Hydrothermal fluids from the Snakepit (MARK) and Rainbow vent fields, both located at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, were chosen as typical of basalt-dominated (MOR) and ultramafic rock-dominated (UM) systems, respectively. A hydrothermal fluid from the Guaymas Basin in the Gulf of California was selected as an example of a sediment-dominated system (SED), in which typical MOR fluids have reacted with organic-rich, reducing sediments. An Au–Ag-bearing fluid from the Pacmanus site (Rogers Ruins) in the Manus Basin was chosen to represent an arc-related system (ARC) dominated by felsic volcanic rocks. All are seawater-dominated systems; fluids typical of magmatically degassing volcanoes at the volcanic fronts of arcs (e.g., Suiyo Seamount) were not modeled because of uncertainties in the fluid compositions and because the hydrothermal products in many cases more closely resemble high-sulfidation epithermal systems than typical seafloor massive sulfide deposits. The pH values of the hydrothermal fluids, all measured at 25 °C, were back-calculated to the initial reservoir temperatures; the pH in the Guaymas Basin model, which is strongly buffered by reaction with sediments, was fixed at 5.9 (Von Damm 1990; Von Damm et al. 2006). The average Au concentration for mid-ocean ridge vent fluids (0.08 ppb = 0.41 nmol Au: Table 2 in ESM 2) was used initially for the calculations of MOR, UM, and SED systems. Conductive cooling was modeled in a closed system in which temperature was lowered in steps from 350 down to < 25 °C. Hydrothermal fluid–seawater mixing was modeled by titrating cold seawater into the hydrothermal end-member until fluid temperatures reached < 25 °C. Precipitated minerals were permitted to back-react over the entire model path.
The simple conductive cooling models illustrate the sensitivity of gold and silver deposition to the original rock buffer. The reaction path for a MOR vent fluid (Snakepit) is shown in Fig. 9, with temperature decreasing from reservoir conditions to an ambient temperature of 2 °C. AuHS° is the dominant Au species at all temperatures above 200 °C; at lower temperatures, AuHS2− becomes dominant. The dominant Ag species at temperatures from 341 to 215 °C is AgCl2−; at lower temperatures, AgHS° becomes dominant. The calculated maximum solubilities at reservoir temperature for gold and silver are 4.5 ppb and 14.7 ppm, respectively. The modeled fluid is highly undersaturated with respect to gold and silver, assuming the average concentrations in MOR vent fluids noted above, and only achieves saturation late in the cooling process. Both native gold and silver start to precipitate at 155 °C in a low-temperature sulfide mineral assemblage of sphalerite, tennantite–(Fe, Zn), tetrahedrite–(Fe, Zn), and galena. Gold precipitation begins after the start of sphalerite deposition and is very rapid, with > 90% of the gold deposited in the first 25 °C of cooling below 150 °C (Fig. 10). The same cooling model was also run with an initial concentration of 1 ppb Au. In this case, gold starts to precipitate at much higher temperatures (283 °C: Fig. 9d) in a sulfide mineral assemblage dominated by chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite.
The reaction path for an ultramafic-hosted system (Rainbow) is strongly influenced by the high H2 concentration (log aH2 = − 1.61), compared to normal MOR fluids (Fig. 11). At temperatures from 362 to 335 °C, AuCl2− is the dominant Au species; at lower temperatures, AuHS° becomes dominant. AgCl2− is the dominant Ag species until 146 °C when AgHS° becomes dominant. The solubilities of gold and silver are generally very low, reflecting the reducing conditions, and reach a maximum of 2.36 ppb Au and 88.9 ppm Ag in the model fluid. As a result, the saturation of gold is achieved at a higher temperature than in the MOR model fluid, and the deposition of gold occurs with chalcopyrite in a Cu–Au-rich assemblage (Murphy and Meyer 1998). The low pH of the fluid causes a higher solubility for Ag, which precipitates after gold at 178 °C. Because the fluids are undersaturated in Ag when gold is precipitating, the native metal is likely to be of high fineness (Ag-poor), providing an explanation for the occurrence of mostly native gold rather than electrum in Cu-rich chimneys of these deposits. A potentially important redox buffer in ultramafic rocks, not considered here, is CO2-CH4. Abiogenic methane production has been widely documented in ultramafic rock-hosted seafloor hydrothermal systems, a process that consumes H2 and CO2 in a Fischer–Tropsch-type reaction (Shock and Schulte 1998; Charlou et al. 2002; Shock and Canovas 2010; Hannington 2014). The lower H2 from this reaction has the potential to increase the solubility of both Au and Ag, but this is likely offset by the production of H2 during serpentinization.
Mineral precipitation in the model for sedimented mid-ocean ridge systems (SED) is strongly influenced by the higher pH compared to the other systems. Au(HS)2− is the dominant aqueous Au species over the entire cooling path (Fig. 12). The fluids dissolve slightly less silver than MOR fluids at 315 °C. At the initial stage of cooling, AgCl2− is dominant to 302 °C; at lower temperatures, Ag(HS)2− is dominant. At the maximum temperatures of the reservoir zone, the low ƒO2 of the fluids results in relatively low Au concentrations as Au(HS)2− (Fig. 7b). However, the solubility in the cooling fluids reaches 25.1 ppb Au at 315 °C (vent temperature in the Guaymas Basin: Fig. 12). In this case, the effect of the high pH on the stability of Au(HS)2− offsets the effect of the lower ƒO2. Because the high-pH fluids are able to transport Au at high concentrations within the stability field of Au(HS)2−, saturation with gold is only achieved at very low temperatures, well after deposition of most of the sulfides, resulting in a generally Au-poor polymetallic sulfide assemblage.
Vent fluids in volcanic arc settings (Roger Ruins model) are characterized by low pH (3.3) and very low H2 content (log aH2 = − 4.98), with high Au and Ag concentrations compared to MOR fluids (Fig. 13; Table 2 in ESM 2). We modeled cooling with an initial Au concentration of 2 nmol/kg (0.4 ppb from Craddock 2010) compared to 0.41 nmol/kg for the MOR fluids (Table 2 in ESM 2). During conductive cooling from 320 °C to ambient temperature, AuHS° is the dominant Au species. AgCl2− is the dominant Ag species down to 167 °C; at lower temperatures, AgHS° becomes dominant. Maximum solubilities in these oxidized fluids are 54 ppb Au and 2134 ppm Ag at reservoir temperatures. Gold saturation is reached after cooling to 161 °C; silver starts to precipitate below 142 °C. Because of the higher initial Au concentration, gold deposition occurs at a slightly higher temperature than in the MOR model, together with chalcopyrite, sphalerite, tennantite–(Fe, Zn), and galena, resulting in an Au-rich polymetallic sulfide assemblage. Differences in the quantities of sulfosalts that are precipitated (e.g., in ARC versus MOR systems) reflect the concentrations of As and Sb in the modeled fluids (Table 2 in ESM 2). Because these fluids have an even higher starting concentration of Au (e.g., average of 4.8 ppb = 0.94 nmol: Table 4), gold precipitation could have occurred at temperatures up to 100 °C higher than indicated in Fig. 13.
Cooling of the MOR hydrothermal fluid to ambient temperature produced a total mineral mass of 1.36 g per 1 kg of fluid. Assuming quantitative deposition of the metal in the starting fluid, the resulting grades are 0.07 g/t Au and 2.55 g/t Ag in the precipitated massive sulfide. The hydrothermal fluids from the ultramafic model precipitated 0.35 g/kg and yield 0.26 g/t Au and 15.0 g/t Ag. The fluids in the sediment-dominated MOR model precipitated 0.72 g/kg and yield 0.13 g/t Au and 0.3 g/t Ag. The arc-related fluids precipitated 1.13 g/kg and yield 0.36 g/t Au and 22.27 g/t Ag. Although the patterns of enrichment in the models are consistent with the grades of the deposits, the modeled grades are mostly 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than the reported median Au und Ag grades in the massive sulfides (Table 1). This may be due to a number of factors: (i) the Au concentrations in the fluids are higher than in the modeled fluids (Table 4), (ii) the sulfides have been upgraded by processes such as zone-refining, and/or (iii) the metals may accumulate in the deposits over time.
In Fig. 14, we simulate step-wise mixing between the high-temperature MOR vent fluid and cold seawater until a final temperature of < 25 °C, corresponding to a final vent fluid to seawater ratio of 1:15. Mixing in the model begins at the initial venting temperature of 341 °C. At a mixing ratio of 1:1, there is a large increase in SO42−, becoming the dominant aqueous sulfur species at 275 °C. However, the relatively slow decrease of H2 and H2S is explained by the limited amount of O2 supplied by the seawater, confirming earlier mixing models (Janecky and Shanks 1988). The maximum solubilities of gold and silver initially increase to 27.8 ppb and 1736 ppm, respectively, at a temperature of about 296 °C due to the small increase in ƒO2, and so gold and silver saturation is delayed. Native gold begins to precipitate at a temperature of 117 °C, and native silver at 76 °C, associated with a low-temperature sulfide mineral assemblage. Mixing in the ratio of > 100:1 would be needed to completely oxidize the hydrothermal fluids (Bethke 2008) and thereby cause quantitative deposition of gold. As a result of the large buffer capacity of the high-temperature fluids, and the production of additional H+ during sulfide oxidation, the pH remains low (4.5) until > 2.25 L of seawater has been mixed with 1 L of the hydrothermal fluid (at 106 °C). This further inhibits the precipitation of gold and some other minerals, such as sphalerite and barite, until low temperatures are reached. Similar results for mixing are observed for the ultramafic- and sediment-dominated systems, as well as the arc-related hydrothermal fluids (Figs. 2, 3, and 4 in ESM 2). In every case, the mixture causes oxidation by seawater increasing the solubility of Au and Ag, which precipitate only at low temperatures (< 150 °C). Because of the high pH of the sediment-dominated (SED) system (Guaymas Basin), metal saturation and precipitation was not reached under the modeled conditions for mixing.
Role of boiling
The role of boiling as a means of gold deposition is becoming increasingly apparent in seafloor hydrothermal vents, as evidence for subcritical phase separation is found in a wide range of different settings (Hannington et al. 1999; Monecke et al. 2014). Boiling at or close to the seafloor was first documented at the relatively shallow Axial Volcano on the Juan de Fuca Ridge (1540 m and 348 °C: Massoth et al. 1989; Butterfield et al. 1990). At 1500 m water depth, the near-vertical adiabats of most fluids at 350 °C will intersect the two-phase boundary about 100 m below the seafloor, and the fluid will boil continuously from that depth as it rises to the seafloor. At these low pressures, the density difference between the vapor and liquid is large, resulting in the separation of a low-salinity, gas-rich phase. The boiling temperatures range from a few hundred degrees at shallow water depths (1000 m) to more than 400 °C in the deepest vents. A compilation of measured vent temperatures in different settings, down to at least 3 km water depth, shows a range of temperatures in every vent field lying on a mixing line that terminates at or near the boiling curve (Fig. 15). The distribution of vent temperatures strongly suggests that the highest-temperature fluids in every system have boiled, and the phenomenon may be much more common than previously thought (Huston 2000). Because boiling is restricted to the hottest vents, a strong Cu–Au enrichment may be expected in the associated chimneys, as observed in recent studies (Gartman et al. 2018). Unboiled fluids that have cooled by mixing with seawater before reaching the seafloor are more likely to produce a Zn–Au association.
Exsolution of dissolved gases (CO2, H2, H2S, SO2) into the vapor phase during boiling shifts both the pH and the redox phase equilibria, thereby strongly influencing Au solubility. These effects have been modeled by Drummond and Ohmoto (1985) and Reed and Spycher (1985). Critical for the precipitation of gold and silver is the fractionation of H2S into the vapor phase, causing a decrease in the activity of HS− that destabilizes the dominant aqueous sulfur complexes, such as AuHS°, Au(HS)2−, and AgHS°. However, model outcomes vary because of the different starting concentrations used in different studies, from 0.1 ppb Au in Reed and Spycher (1985), and much higher concentrations (i.e., at saturation) in Drummond and Ohmoto (1985). Reed and Spycher (1984, 1985) employed a stepwise calculation to model isoenthalpic boiling, calculating the amount of mineral precipitated for each degree of temperature decrease along the P–T curve. In their models, gold was not precipitated because of the low Au concentration of the fluid, and it was necessary to remove almost all of the aqueous sulfide to sulfide minerals and gas in order to reach saturation. In subsequent models for the Broadlands geothermal system, Spycher and Reed (1989) used a much higher Au concentration of 1.5 ppb (Brown 1986) and showed that gold precipitates readily upon boiling at these high concentrations, depositing early relative to the base metal sulfides as a consequence of the low chloride concentrations of the fluids. Drummond and Ohmoto (1985) showed that the pH increases significantly during boiling when H+ < HCO3−, as the destabilization of aqueous HCO3− to produce CO2 consumes H+ according to the reaction:
This promotes Au solubility in the initial stages of boiling, especially at high temperatures (Spycher and Reed 1989); however, at higher temperatures, the effect of the pH change is small, allowing gold to precipitate. Moreover, in fluids with initial concentrations of H+ > HCO3−, as in most MOR vent fluids (Table 2 in ESM 2), the pH does not change significantly during boiling and decreases slightly as a result of the adiabatic cooling.
Figure 16 shows a model for incremental boiling of an Au-rich black smoker fluid, following the method of Drummond and Ohmoto (1985). The models for ultramafic-hosted, sediment-hosted, and arc-related fluids (UM, SED, ARC) are presented in Figs. 5, 6, and 7 in ESM 2. Boiling is simulated by combining the cooling model with the loss of volatile gas species from 350 to 200 °C in an isoenthalpic, open system. Gases are removed incrementally and the liquid re-equilibrated in a stepwise manner until 100% of the fluid has boiled at 200 °C. The partitioning of the gases between the liquid and vapor phase is calculated using the volatility ratios (VR), a measure of the affinity of a gas species for the vapor phase in a two-phase system defined as:
where mvapor and mliquid are the molality of volatile compounds in the respective phase. We derived values of VR by the methods of Drummond and Ohmoto (1985):
where KH represents the fugacity/molality ratio of the volatile gas species, VvW the specific volume of the water vapor, Z the compressibility factor of the gas in the vapor phase, R the gas constant, and T the absolute temperature. The volatility ratios of the dissolved gases increase during cooling, which results in strong partitioning into the vapor according to: H2 > CO2 > H2S > SO2.
At the beginning of boiling, AuHS° is the dominant aqueous Au species, and AuOH° becomes more important with progressive boiling and cooling due to the loss of H2S and the oxidation of the fluid. As a result, the total solubility of gold increases, relative to the simple conductive cooling model, at temperatures from 341 to 304 °C (Fig. 16b) and then rapidly decreases with further cooling and phase separation. The competing effects of H2 and H2S loss maintain a high solubility of gold until ~ 304 °C, where the volatility of H2 > H2S, resulting in oxidation of the liquid. The loss of H2S eventually results in a decrease in the solubility of Au compared to the conductive cooling case (cross-over in Fig. 16b), but the remaining H2S is sufficient to prevent gold deposition until relatively large degrees of boiling, similar to the situation observed by Reed and Spycher (1984, 1985). Precipitation of gold under these conditions, therefore, requires starting Au concentrations of at least several parts per billion, such as a starting concentration of 2 ppb Au results in gold precipitation at 283 °C, as observed in New Zealand geothermal wells and elsewhere (Brown 1986; Spycher and Reed 1989; Simmons et al. 2016). In some chimneys (Berkenbosch et al. 2012) and in mineral scales from boiling hydrothermal wells (Hardardóttir et al. 2010), distinctive banding of chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, and gold may be evidence of pulsed phase separation. These examples may reflect conditions where the liquid spontaneously flashes into steam, with dramatic effects on gold deposition (Brown 1986). This has been observed in active vents at water depths close to the boiling point of seawater, where the phase separation is highly localized (Schmidt et al. 2017; Gartman et al. 2018), and has resulted in spectacular Cu and Au grades in the deepest and hottest vents. But just a few meters away, the hydrothermal venting may be occurring at much lower temperatures, owing to mixing and cooling, resulting in highly variable grades developed over very short distances. Spycher and Reed (1989) modeled similar effects (superenthalpic boiling) by adding excess heat from either a dike intruding within the hydrothermal system or by self-sealing and then fracturing to release volatiles.
Direct magmatic contribution
The concentrations of metals in mid-ocean ridge black smoker fluids are considered by many to be too low to have produced the large-tonnage VMS deposits in the geologic record (Scott 1997). Mass-balance considerations for typical EPR vent fluids require large volumes of hydrothermal fluid and leached rock to produce a major ore deposit, suggesting that other sources of metals must be involved. Several researchers have concluded that direct magmatic contributions of metals are necessary (Urabe 1987; Huston and Large 1989; Stanton 1990; Stanton 1994; Large et al. 1996; Scott 1997; Yang and Scott 2002; Yang and Scott 2006). However, the extent of this contribution is debated (Huston et al. 2011). At mid-ocean ridges, it is unlikely that exsolved magmatic brines are volumetrically significant, owing to the low H2O content of MORB, but such fluids may be produced by more water-rich magmas in arc environments, as 75% of recently active submarine arc volcanoes are either degassing or host magmatic–hydrothermal systems (de Ronde et al. 2011, 2014). Gruen et al. (2012, 2014) recently modeled the magmatic–hydrothermal system at the submarine Brothers volcano and concluded that a magmatic component played an integral part in the hydrothermal system, supporting earlier geochemical evidence (de Ronde et al. 2011).
The role of magmatic volatiles in the enrichment of Au seems certain, but the mechanism of transfer of the metal from the magma to the discharging hydrothermal fluids is unclear. The discovery of metal-rich, CO2-bearing fluids coexisting with melt inclusions in andesite from the eastern Manus Basin supports the suggestion that metals could be sourced directly from the magma or leached from magmatic rocks (Yang and Scott 1996, 2002; Kamenetsky et al. 2001). Limited oxygen and hydrogen isotope data also suggest that direct contributions of magmatic water have occurred in some arc and back-arc hydrothermal systems (Gamo et al. 1997; Marumo and Hattori 1999). Notable enrichments of certain trace elements (e.g., Bi, Se, In, Te, and Sn) have been argued as evidence for a magmatic contribution to some deposits (Dekov and Savelli 2004; Hannington et al. 2005; Berkenbosch et al. 2012). The basis for suggesting that these elements may be magmatically derived is their common association in porphyry Cu deposits as well as experimental evidence for their strong partitioning into aqueous fluids during crystallization of felsic magmas (Candela and Piccoli 2005). Even at mid-ocean ridges, brine inclusions of probable magmatic derivation in subseafloor plutonic rocks contain daughter minerals of pyrite and chalcopyrite that indicate metal concentrations of up to 1000s of ppm Fe and Cu in the trapped fluids (Kelley and Delaney 1987; de Ronde 1995).
Only a small contribution from such brines, mixed with modified seawater, can account for major metal concentrations in the vent fluids (Yang and Scott 2006). Seawater-dominated hydrothermal fluids charged with Au from a deep magmatic source are strong candidates for Cu–Au mineralization in some systems. However, the interpretation of a direct magmatic contribution to seafloor hydrothermal fluids is made difficult by the lack of data on the compositions of the magmatic fluids. Au concentrations in suspected magmatic fluids from seafloor hydrothermal vents have never been measured. However, up to 16 ppb Au has been measured in deep geothermal fluids from the magmatic–hydrothermal system at Lihir (Simmons and Brown 2006), representing a likely end-member concentration. Others have shown that the magmatic vapor plume of arc volcanoes, such as White Island, could deliver a significant amount of Cu and Au to the seafloor in a submarine setting, with combined fluxes of 110,000 kg/year Cu, 2190 kg/year Bi, and > 36 kg/year Au from passive degassing and quiescent eruptions (LeCloarec et al. 1992; Hedenquist et al. 1993).
Discussion
The many different styles of Au-rich SMS deposits (Table 3) highlight a wide range of processes that work independently or in combination to cause Au enrichment. Some of the conditions whereby different Au-bearing mineral assemblages may be precipitated are shown by reaction-path modeling, but the calculations also raise a number of questions. Simple conductive cooling of vent fluids buffered by different rock types (Figs. 9, 11, 12, and 13) can result in dramatically different Zn–Au and Cu–Au assemblages, depending on the starting concentrations of Au. The conditions that promote or limit the precipitation of gold, and silver, include a complex interplay of temperature, pH, and redox state. The concentrations of available ligands, such as H2S and Cl−, in almost all types of seafloor hydrothermal fluids exceed the amounts required to form stable chloride and bisulfide complexes of Au and Ag. As a result, fluids with metal concentrations typical of end-member MOR fluids must cool to lower temperatures in order to achieve gold and silver saturation. Mixing with cold seawater causes a decrease in H2S but also H2, the result being an increase the solubility of gold, so that saturation is further delayed. Hydrothermal fluids that are more reduced, such as those buffered by ultramafic rocks, are able to transport less Au and Ag, but may produce Cu–Au assemblages because they become saturated at higher temperatures. More oxidized fluids, common in arc settings, are able to transport higher concentrations of Au and Ag, leading to precipitation of Au in lower-temperature polymetallic assemblages. Where such fluids have higher end-member Au concentrations, due to magmatic contributions, they too become saturated at higher temperatures leading to a strong Cu–Au association. Geochemical modeling also shows that the extent of the buffering during fluid ascent and cooling leads to even more complex mineral paragenesis and is a topic for further investigation.
The significant undersaturation of the MOR fluids begs the question: how is gold deposited in higher-temperature polymetallic and Cu-rich assemblages in some deposits? Gold concentrations much higher than the modeled concentration of Au (0.1 ppb) are needed to saturate the liquid, as in the ARC fluids, and/or dramatic changes in fluid chemistry must occur, such as boiling. In the undersaturated fluids, the availability of Au in the rock is potentially a major control on enrichment. The remarkably consistent proportions of major and trace metals in the deposits closely match the metal ratios in their source rocks (Hannington 2014; Monecke et al. 2016). Average concentrations of Au in typical basaltic, ultramafic and continental/crustal source rocks (Table 6) are in the same order as the median grades in massive sulfides samples (MOR < UM < ARC: Fig. 2). However, the range of Au concentrations in the source rocks is small compared to the range of concentrations in the deposits and the hydrothermal fluids. Gold concentrations in basalt vary by no more than a factor of 5 (Table 6), whereas end-member fluid concentrations in MOR settings span more than 2 orders of magnitude (< 0.1 ppb to at least 10 ppb: Table 5). Thus, the enrichment of Au cannot be due to variations in source rock concentration alone, and another process is needed to account for high concentrations observed in some fluids. Moreover, an increase in the solubility of the gold will make no difference to the end-member concentration if all of the Au has already been leached from the rock.
Continuous recycling of metals during the lifetime of a vent system may upgrade the metal concentrations in the fluids, providing a local source for very high Au concentrations in the fluids and resulting in some exceptionally rich zones (e.g., Hannington et al. 1995). In some cases, the metal may be stripped from a deposit, as in a process of “over-refining” (Hannington et al. 1998). In volcanic arc settings, it is highly probable that direct magmatic contributions to the hydrothermal fluids are responsible for Au enrichment, and high Au concentrations of the fluids, explaining the Cu–Au enrichment in some deposits. However, other deposits are enriched in Au that do not show any evidence of a magmatic input in terms of trace elements, alteration, or isotopic systems. Recent data from deep drill holes at Reykjanes suggest that geothermal fluids may be progressively enriched in Au over time by boiling in the reservoir zone (Hannington et al. 2016). Some of these geothermal fluids have bulk Au concentrations far in excess of liquid saturation indicating that at least part of the transported gold must be present as nanoparticle suspensions.
Conclusions
We have examined a number of the factors that control gold deposition in black smoker deposits using simultaneous aqueous–mineral–gas equilibria. Reaction-path modeling of simple conductive cooling and mixing of end-member hydrothermal fluids shows that much of the variability in Au and Ag deposition, such as early Cu–Au in ultramafic systems and later Zn–Au under normal mid-ocean ridge conditions, is a consequence of the rock buffer. In MOR systems, gold deposition is delayed to lower temperatures owing to the stability of the AuHS° and Au(HS)2− complexes at moderate pH and ƒO2 (PPM and PEQMAP buffers). During conductive cooling, gold precipitation after the start of sphalerite deposition is very rapid, with > 90% of the gold deposited in the first 25 °C of cooling below 150 °C. The result is a low-temperature Zn–Au polymetallic assemblage, with gold and silver deposited together with galena and sulfosalts. In ultramafic-dominated systems, gold deposition occurs earlier owing to the lower stability of the AuHS° complex at low ƒO2 (FMQ buffer). Gold deposition begins at 250 °C, before sphalerite deposition and is slower, requiring 75 °C of cooling to deposit > 90% of the gold. The result is a higher-temperature Cu–Au assemblage, with gold deposited before silver in an early bornite–chalcopyrite assemblage. In sediment-dominated systems, the much higher pH stabilizes Au(HS)2− and keeps gold in solution to very low temperature (~ 70 °C), after the precipitation of most sulfides, resulting in a relatively Au-poor polymetallic sulfide assemblage and very late-stage deposition of gold, for example, with amorphous silica. In ARC systems, with higher initial Au concentrations in the fluids, gold deposition occurs at a slightly higher temperatures than in MOR systems, together with chalcopyrite, sphalerite, tennantite, and galena, resulting in an Au-rich polymetallic sulfide assemblage.
In all cases, the modeled end-member fluids are highly undersaturated, and a complex interplay of physicochemical processes affecting temperature, pH, and redox state controls the timing of gold precipitation, the style of mineralization, and the metal grades. Conductive cooling, down to ambient temperatures, is an efficient mechanism for the precipitation of native gold and silver at low temperatures in all but the ultramafic rock-hosted systems. Mixing with cold seawater can shift the deposition of gold to even lower temperatures mainly because of the increased stability of AuOH°. During boiling, the loss of H2 (> H2S) causes an initial increase in the solubility of gold, followed by a rapid decrease in solubility due to removal of H2S and deposition of gold at higher temperatures than for conductive cooling alone. Silver precipitation during boiling is limited due to the conservative behavior of Cl−, providing an explanation for the occurrence of gold of high fineness in Cu–Au assemblages associated with high-temperature boiling. However, modeled grades of Au and Ag are generally lower than those in the sampled deposits, suggesting that a number of additional processes must contribute to the total precious metal budget. New data from the seafloor are highlighting some of the processes that are responsible for the most Au-rich deposits. Recognizing that such complexity exists, and that Au enrichment may be attributable to different processes in different deposits, or even in different parts of the same deposit, has important implications for exploration.
References
Akinfiev NN, Zotov AV (2001) Thermodynamic description of chloride, hydrosulfide, and hydroxo complexes of Ag (I), Cu (I), and Au (I) at temperatures of 25–500°C and pressures of 1–2000 bar. Geochem Int 39:990–1006
Akinfiev NN, Zotov AV (2010) Thermodynamic description of aqueous species in the system Cu-Ag-Au-S-O-H at temperatures of 0–600°C and pressures of 1–3000 bar. Geochem Int 48:714–720
Allen DE, Seyfried WE Jr (2003) Compositional controls on vent fluids from ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal systems at mid-ocean ridges: an experimental study at 400°C, 500 bars. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67:1531–1542
Anschutz P, Blanc G (1995) Chemical mass balances in metalliferous deposits from the Atlantis II Deep, Red Sea. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:4205–4218
Anschutz P, Blanc G, Stille P (1995) Origin of fluids and the evolution of the Atlantis II Deep hydrothermal system, Red Sea: strontium isotope study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59:4799–4808
Baker ET, German CR (2004) On the global distribution of hydrothermal vent fields. In: German CR, Lin J, Parson LM (eds) Mid-ocean ridges: hydrothermal interactions between the lithosphere and oceans. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 245–266
Barton PB Jr (1978) Some ore textures involving sphalerite from the Furutobe Mine, Akita Prefecture, Japan. Min Geol 28:293–300
Barton PB, Toulmin P (1966) Phase relations involving sphalerite in the Fe–Zn–S system. Econ Geol 61:815–849
Beaulieu SE, Baker ET, German CR, Maffei A (2013) An authoritative global database for active submarine hydrothermal vent fields. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 14:4892–4905
Berkenbosch HA, de Ronde CEJ, Gemmell JB, McNeill AW, Goemann K (2012) Mineralogy and formation of black smoker chimneys from Brothers submarine volcano, Kermadec arc. Econ Geol 107:1613–1633
Bethke CM (2008) Geochemical and biogeochemical modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 564
Binns RA, Parr JM, Gemmell JB, Whitford DJ, Dean JA (1997) Precious metals in barite-silica chimneys from Franklin seamount, Woodlark Basin, Papua New Guinea. Mar Geol 142:119–141
Botcharnikov RE, Linnen RL, Wilke M, Holtz F, Jogo JJ (2010) High gold concentrations in sulphide-bearing magma under oxidizing conditions. Nat Geosci 4:112–115
Brown KL (1986) Gold deposition from geothermal discharges in New Zealand. Econ Geol 81:979–983
Butterfield DA, Massoth GJ, McDuff RE, Lupton JE, Lilley MD (1990) Geochemistry of hydrothermal fluids from axial seamount hydrothermal emissions study vent field, Juan de Fuca ridge: subseafloor boiling and subsequent fluid-rock interaction. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 95:12895–12921
Campbell AC, Edmond JM, Colodner D, Palmer MR (1987) Chemistry of hydrothermal fluids from the Mariana trough back arc basin in comparison to mid-ocean ridge fluids. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 68:1531
Candela PA, Piccoli PM (2005) Magmatic processes in the development of porphyry-type systems. In: Hedenquist J, Thompson G, Goldfarb RJ, Richards JP (eds) One hundredth anniversary volume. Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, pp 25–38
Charlou JL, Donval JP, Fouquet Y, Jean-Baptiste P, Holm N (2002) Geochemistry of high H2 and CH4 vent fluids issuing from ultramafic rocks at the Rainbow hydrothermal field (36°14′N, MAR). Chem Geol 191:345–359
Craddock PR (2009) Geochemical tracers of processes affecting the formation of seafloor hydrothermal fluids and deposits in the Manus back-arc basin. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole
de Ronde CEJ (1995) Fluid chemistry and isotopic characteristics of seafloor hydrothermal systems and associated VMS deposits: potential for magmatic contributions. Min Assoc of Canada Short Course Series 23:479–509
de Ronde CEJ, Massoth GJ, Butterfield DA, Christenson BW, Ishibashi J, Ditchburn RG, Hannington MD, Brathwaite RL, Lupton JE, Kamenetsky VS, Graham IJ, Zellmer GF, Dziak RP, Embley RW, Dekov VM, Munnik F, Lahr J, Evans LJ, Takai K (2011) Submarine hydrothermal activity and gold-rich mineralization at Brothers volcano, Kermadec arc, New Zealand. Mineral Deposita 46:541–584
de Ronde CEJ, Berkenbosch HA, Hannington MD (2014) Gold-rich hydrothermal systems related to submarine volcanic arcs. In: Gold14@Kalgoorlie. 08.10-10.10.2014, Curtin Univ., Kalgoorlie, Austrialia. Extented abstract. pp 19-21
Dekov VM, Savelli C (2004) Hydrothermal activity in the SE Tyrrhenian Sea: an overview of 30 years of research. Mar Geol 204:161–185
DeMets C, Gordon RG, Argus DF (2010) Geologically current plate motions. Geophys J Int 181:1–80
Driesner T, Heinrich CA (2007) The system H2O–NaCl. Part I: correlation formulae for phase relations in temperature–pressure–composition space from 0 to 1000°C, 0 to 5000 bar, and 0 to 1 XNaCl. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:4880–4901
Drummond SE, Ohmoto H (1985) Chemical evolution and mineral deposition in boiling hydrothermal systems. Econ Geol 80:126–147
Dubé B, Gosselin P, Mercier-Langevin P, Hannington M D, Galley A G (2007) Gold-rich volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. Geol Assoc of Canada, MDD Spec Pub 5:75–94
Eldridge CS, Barton PB Jr, Ohmoto H (1983) Mineral textures and their bearing on formation of the Kuroko orebodies. Econ Geol Monogr 5:241–281
Falkner KK, Edmond JM (1990) Gold in seawater. Earth Planet Sc Lett 98:208–221
Firstova A, Stepanova T, Cherkashov G, Goncharov A, Babaeva S (2016) Composition and formation of gabbro-peridotite hosted seafloor massive sulfide deposits from the Ashadze-1 hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Minerals 6:19
Fouquet Y, Wafik A, Cambon P, Mével C, Meyer G, Gente P (1993) Tectonic setting and mineralogical and geochemical zonation in the Snake Pit sulfide deposit (Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 23° N). Econ Geol 88:2018–2036
Fouquet Y, Cambon P, Etoubleau J, Charlou J L, Ondréas H, Barriga S, Cherkashov G., Semkova T, Poroshina I, Bohn M, Donval JP, Katell H, Murphy P, Rouxel O (2013) Geodiversity of hydrothermal processes along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and ultramafic-hosted mineralization: a new type of oceanic Cu-Zn-Co-Au volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit. In: Rona PA, Devey CW, Dyment J, Murton BJ (eds) Diversity of hydrothermal systems on slow spreading ocean ridges. Geoph Monog Series 188:321–367
Francheteau J, Needham HD, Choukroune P, Juteau T, Séguret M, Ballard RD, Fox PJ, Normark W, Carranza A, Cordoba D, Guerrero J, Rangin C, Bougault H, Cambon P, Hekinian R (1979) Massive deep-sea sulphide ore deposits discovered on the East Pacific Rise. Nature 277:523–528
Franklin JM, Gibson HL, Jonasson IR, Galley AG (2005) Volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. In: Hedenquist J, Thompson G, Goldfarb RJ, Richards JP (eds) One hundredth anniversary volume. Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, pp 523–561
Früh-Green GL, Connolly JAD, Plas A, Kelley DS, Grobéty B (2004) Serpentinization of oceanic peridotites: implications for geochemical cycles and biological activity. In: Wilcock WSD, Kelley DS, Baross JA et al (eds) The subseafloor biosphere at mid-ocean ridges. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D. C, pp 119–136
Gamo T, Okamura K, Charlou JL, Urabe T, Auzende JM, Ishibashi J, Shitashima K, Chiba H (1997) Acidic and sulfate-rich hydrothermal fluids from the Manus back-arc basin, Papua New Guinea. Geology 25:139–142
Gartman A, Hannington MD, Jamieson JW, Peterkin B, Garbe-Schönberg D, Findlay AJ, Fuchs S, Kwasnitschka T (2018) Boiling-induced formation of colloidal gold in black smoker hydrothermal fluids. Geology 46:39–42
German CR, Von Damm KL (2004) 6.07—hydrothermal processes. In: Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry. Elsevier/Pergamon, Amsterdam, pp 181–222
German CR, Petersen S, Hannington MD (2016) Hydrothermal exploration of mid-ocean ridges: where might the largest sulfide deposits be forming? Chem Geol 420:114–126
Gruen G, Weis P, Driesner T, de Ronde CEJ, Heinrich CA (2012) Fluid-flow patterns at Brothers volcano, southern Kermadec arc: insights from geologically constrained numerical simulations. Econ Geol 107:1595–1611
Gruen G, Weis P, Driesner T, de Ronde CEJ, Heinrich CA (2014) Hydrodynamic modeling of magmatic–hydrothermal activity at submarine arc volcanoes, with implications for ore formation. Earth Planet Sc Lett 404:307–318
Halbach P, Pracejus B, Maerten A (1993) Geology and mineralogy of massive sulfide ores from the central Okinawa Trough, Japan. Econ Geol 88:2210–2225
Hall G, Vaive J, Hannington MD, McConachy TF (1988) Gold and associated trace elements in vent waters and suspended particulates from Southern Explorer Ridge. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 69:1501
Hamlyn PR, Keays RR, Cameron WE, Crawford AJ, Waldron H (1985) Precious metals in magnesian low-Ti lavas: implications for metallogenesis and sulfur saturation in primary magmas. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 49:1797–1811
Hannington MD (2014) 13.18—volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. In: Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry (Second edition). Elsevier, Oxford, pp 463–488
Hannington MD, Scott SD (1988) Gold and silver potential of polymetallic sulfide deposits on the sea floor. Mar Min 7:271–285
Hannington MD, Scott SD (1989a) Gold mineralization in volcanogenic massive sulfides: implications of data from active hydrothermal vents on the modern seafloor. Econ Geol Monogr 6:491–507
Hannington MD, Scott SD (1989b) Sulfidation equilibria as guides to gold mineralization in volcanogenic massive sulfides; evidence from sulfide mineralogy and the composition of sphalerite. Econ Geol 84:1978–1995
Hannington MD, Peter JM, Scott SD (1986) Gold in sea-floor polymetallic sulfide deposits. Econ Geol 81:1867–1883
Hannington MD, Thompson G, Rona PA, Scott SD (1988) Gold and native copper in supergene sulphides from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature 333:64–66
Hannington MD, Herzig PM, Scott SD (1991a) Auriferous hydrothermal precipitates on the modern seafloor. In: Foster RP (ed) Gold metallogeny and exploration. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 249–282
Hannington MD, Herzig PM, Scott S, Thompson G, Rona P (1991b) Comparative mineralogy and geochemistry of gold-bearing sulfide deposits on the mid-ocean ridges. Mar Geol 101:217–248
Hannington MD, Tivey MK, Laroque ACL, Petersen S, Rona PA (1995) The occurence of gold in sulfide deposits of the TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Can Mineral 33:1285–1310
Hannington MD, Galley AG, Herzig PM, Petersen S (1998) Comparison of the TAG mound and stockwork complex with Cyprus-type massive sulfide deposits. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific results 158:389–415
Hannington MD, Poulsen KH, Thompson JFH (1999) Volcanogenic gold in the massive sulfide environment
Hannington MD, Petersen S, Herzig PM, Jonasson IR (2004) A global database of seafloor hydrothermal systems, including a digital database of geochemical analyses of seafloor polymetallic sulfides. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 4598, 1 CD-ROM
Hannington MD, de Ronde CDJ, Petersen S (2005) Sea-floor tectonics and submarine hydrothermal systems. In: Hedenquist J, Thompson G, Goldfarb RJ, Richards JP (eds) One hundredth anniversary volume. Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, pp 111–141
Hannington MD, Jamieson J, Monecke T, Petersen S (2010) Modern sea-floor massive sulfides and base metal resources: toward an estimate of global sea-floor massive sulfide potential. Rev Econ Geol 15:317–337
Hannington MD, Hardardóttir V, Garbe-Schönberg D, Brown KL (2016) Gold enrichment in active geothermal systems by accumulating colloidal suspensions. Nat Geosci 9:1–5
Hannington MD, Petersen S, Monecke T, Mercier-Langevin P (2017) Divining gold in VMS systems: news from the seafloor. Proc. 14th SGA biennal meeting: 43–46
Hardardóttir V, Brown KL, Fridriksson T, Hedenquist JW, Hannington MD, Thorhallsson S (2009) Metals in deep liquid of the Reykjanes geothermal system, southwest Iceland: implications for the composition of seafloor black smoker fluids. Geology 37:1103–1106
Hardardóttir V, Hannington M, Hedenquist J, Kjarsgaard I, Hoal K (2010) Cu-rich scales in the Reykjanes geothermal system, Iceland. Econ Geol 105:1143–1155
Hedenquist JW, Simmons SF, Giggenbach WF, Eldridge CS (1993) White Island, New Zealand, volcanic-hydrothermal system represents the geochemical environment of high-sulfidation Cu and Au ore deposition. Geology 21:731–734
Hekinian R, Renard V, Cheminée JL (1983) Hydrothermal deposits on the East Pacific Rise near 13° N: geological setting and distribution of active sulfide chimneys. In: Rona PA, Boström K, Laubier L, Smith KL (eds) Hydrothermal processes at seafloor spreading centers. Springer, Boston, pp 571–594
Helgeson HC (1969) Thermodynamics of hydrothermal systems at elevated temperatures and pressures. Am J Sci 267:729–804
Herzig PM, Hannington MD (1990) Gold found in Lau back-arc sulfides. EOS Trans AGU 71:1090
Herzig PM, Hannington MD (1995) Polymetallic massive sulfides at the modem seafloor: a review. Ore Geol Rev 10:95–115
Herzig PM, Hannington M, Fouquet Y, von Stackelberg U, Petersen S (1993) Gold-rich polymetallic sulfides from the Lau back arc and implications for the geochemistry of gold in sea-floor hydrothermal systems of the Southwest Pacific. Econ Geol 88:2182–2209
Huston DL (2000) Gold in volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits: distribution, genesis, and exploration. In: Hagemann SG, Brown PE (eds) Gold in 2000. Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, pp 401–426
Huston DL, Large RR (1989) A chemical model for the concentration of gold in volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. Ore Geol Rev 4:171–200
Huston DL, Relvas JMRS, Gemmell JB, Drieberg S (2011) The role of granites in volcanic-hosted massive sulphide ore-forming systems: an assessment of magmatic–hydrothermal contributions. Mineral Deposita 46:473–507
Ihle T, Petersen S, Herzig PM, Hannington MD (2005) Siting of gold and characteristics of gold-bearing massive sulfides from the interior of the felsic-hosted PACMANUS massive sulfide deposit, eastern Manus basin (PNG). In: Mao J, Bierlein FP (eds) Mineral deposit research: meeting the global challenge. Springer, Berlin, pp 623–626
Iizasa K, Asada A, Mizuno K, Katase F, Lee S, Kojima M, Ogawa N (2018) Native gold and gold-rich sulfide deposits in a submarine basaltic caldera, Higashi-Aogashima hydrothermal field, Izu-Ogasawara frontal arc, Japan. Mineral Deposita 107:1613–1616
Janecky DR, Shanks WC (1988) Computational modeling of chemical and sulfur isotopic reaction processes in sea-floor hydrothermal systems; chimneys, massive sulfide, and subjacent alteration zones. Can Mineral 26:805–825
Jenner FE, O’Neill HSC (2012a) Analysis of 60 elements in 616 ocean floor basaltic glasses. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13(1):1–11
Jenner FE, O’Neill HSC (2012b) Major and trace analysis of basaltic glasses by laser-ablation ICP-MS. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13(3):11–17
Jenner FE, Arculus RJ, Mavrogenes JA, Dyriw NJ, Nebel O, Hauri EH (2012) Chalcophile element systematics in volcanic glasses from the northwestern Lau Basin. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13(6):1–25
JOGMEC – Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation (2016) 2016 annual report, pp 52
Johnson JW, Oelkers EH, Helgeson HC (1992) SUPCRT92: a software package for calculating the standard molal thermodynamic properties of minerals, gases, aqueous species, and reactions from 1 to 5000 bar and 0 to 1000°C. Comput Geosci 18:899–947
Kamenetsky VS, Binns RA, Gemmell JB, Crawford AJ, Mernagh TP, Maas R, Steele D (2001) Parental basaltic melts and fluids in eastern Manus backarc basin: implications for hydrothermal mineralisation. Earth Planet Sc Lett 184:685–702
Keays RR (1987) Principles of mobilization (dissolution) of metals in mafic and ultramafic rocks—the role of immiscible magmatic sulphides in the generation of hydrothermal gold and volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. Ore Geol Rev 2:47–63
Keays RR, Scott RB (1976) Precious metals in ocean-ridge basalts; implications for basalts as source rocks for gold mineralization. Econ Geol 71:705–720
Keith M, Häckel F, Haase KM, Schwarz-Schampera U, Klemd R (2016) Trace element systematics of pyrite from submarine hydrothermal vents. Ore Geol Rev 72:728–745
Kelley DS, Delaney JR (1987) Two-phase separation and fracturing in mid-ocean ridge gabbros at temperatures greater than 700°C. Earth Planet Sc Lett 83:53–66
Kelley DS, Früh-Green GL (1999) Abiogenic methane in deep-seated mid-ocean ridge environments: insights from stable isotope analyses. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104:10439–10460
Kong X-Z, Tutolo BM, Saar MO (2013) DBCreate: a SUPCRT92-based program for producing EQ3/6, TOUGHREACT, and GWB thermodynamic databases at user-defined T and P. Comput Geosci 51:415–417
Large RR (1992) Australian volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits; features, styles, and genetic models. Econ Geol 87:471–510
Large RR, Huston DL, McGoldrick PJ, Ruxton PA, McArthur G (1989) Gold distribution and genesis in Australian volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits and their significance for gold transport models. Econ Geol Monogr 6:520–535
Large R, Doyle M, Raymond O, Cooke D, Jones A, Heasman L (1996) Evaluation of the role of Cambrian granites in the genesis of world class VHMS deposits in Tasmania. Ore Geol Rev 10:215–230
Laurila TE, Hannington MD, Petersen S, Garbe-Schönberg D (2014) Trace metal distribution in the Atlantis II Deep (Red Sea) sediments. Chem Geol 386:80–100
Laurila TE, Hannington MD, Leybourne M, Petersen S, Devey CW, Garbe-Schönberg D (2015) New insights into the mineralogy of the Atlantis II Deep metalliferous sediments, Red Sea. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 16:4449–4478
LeCloarec MF, Allard P, Ardouin B, Giggenbach WF, Sheppard DS (1992) Radioactive isotopes and trace elements in gaseous emissions from White Island, New Zealand. Earth Planet Sc Lett 108:19–28
Lein AY, Cherkashev GA, Ul’yanov AA, Stepanova TV, Sagalevich AM, Bogdanov YA, Gurvich EG, Torokhov MP (2003) Mineralogy and geochemistry of sulfide ores from the logachev-2 and rainbow fields: resemblance and distinction features. Geochem Int 41:271–294
Lonsdale P (1977) Clustering of suspension-feeding macrobenthos near abyssal hydrothermal vents at oceanic spreading centers. Deep-Sea Res 24:857–863
Marumo K, Hattori KH (1999) Seafloor hydrothermal clay alteration at Jade in the back-arc Okinawa Trough: mineralogy, geochemistry and isotope characteristics. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:2785–2804
Massoth GJ, Butterfield DA, Lupton JE, McDuff RE, Lilley MD, Jonasson IR (1989) Submarine venting of phase-separated hydrothermal fluids at axial volcano, Juan de Fuca ridge. Nature 340:702–705
McKibben M, Hardie L (1997) Ore-forming brines in active continental rifts. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 877–930
Melekestseva IY, Kotlyarov VA, Khvorov PV, Ivanov VN, Beltenev VE, Dobretsova IG (2010) Noble-metal mineralization in the Semenov-2 hydrothermal field (13°31′N), Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Geol Ore Deposit+ 52:800–810
Melekestseva IY, Tret'yakov GA, Nimis P, Yuminov AM, Maslennikov VV, Maslennikova SP, Kotlyarov VA, Beltenev VE, Danyushevsky LV, Large R (2014) Barite-rich massive sulfides from the Semenov-1 hydrothermal field (Mid-Atlantic Ridge, 13°30.87′ N): evidence for phase separation and magmatic input. Mar Geol 349:37–54
Melekestseva IY, Maslennikov VV, Tret'yakov GA, Nimis P, Beltenev VE, Rozhdestvenskaya II, Maslennikova SP, Belogub EV, Danyushevsky L, Large R, Yuminov AM, Sadykov SA (2017) Gold- and silver-rich massive sulfides from the Semenov-2 hydrothermal field, 13°31.13′N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge: a case of magmatic contribution? Econ Geol 112:741–773
Mercier-Langevin P, Hannington MD, Dubé B, Bécu V (2011) The gold content of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits. Mineral Deposita 46:509–539
Monecke T, Petersen S, Hannington MD (2014) Constraints on water depth of massive sulfide formation: evidence from modern seafloor hydrothermal systems in arc-related settings. Econ Geol 109:2079–2101
Monecke T, Petersen S, Hannington MD, Grant H, Samson I (2016) The minor element endowment of modern sea-floor massive sulfide deposits and comparison with deposits hosted in ancient volcanic successions. Rev Econ Geol 18:245–306
Moss R, Scott SD (2001) Geochemistry and mineralogy of gold-rich hydrothermal precipitates from the eastern Manus Basin, Papua New Guinea. Can Mineral 39:957–978
Moss R, Scott SD, Binns RA (2001) Gold content of eastern Manus Basin volcanic rocks: implications for enrichment in associated hydrothermal precipitates. Econ Geol 96:91–107
Mozgova NN, Trubkin NV, Borodaev YS, Cherkashev GA, Stepanova TV, Semkova TA, Uspenskaya TY (2008) Mineralogy of massive sulfides from the Ashadze hydrothermal field, 13°N, Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Can Mineral 46:545–567
Murphy PJ, Meyer G (1998) A gold-copper association in ultramafic-hosted hydrothermal sulfides from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Econ Geol 93:1076–1083
Nautilus Minerals Inc. (2012) Mineral resource estimate for the Solwara 1 Project, Bismarck Sea, Papua New Guinea, NI43-101 technical report, pp 240
Park JW, Campbell IH, Kim J, Moon JW (2015) The role of late sulfide saturation in the formation of a Cu- and Au-rich magma: insights from the platinum group element geochemistry of Niuatahi-Motutahi lavas, Tonga rear arc. J Petrol 56:59–81
Patten CGC, Pitcairn IK, Teagle DAH (2017) Hydrothermal mobilisation of Au and other metals in supra-subduction oceanic crust: insights from the Troodos ophiolite. Ore Geol Rev 86:487–508
Pearce JE, Ernewein M, Bloomer SH, Parson LM, Murton BJ, Johnson LE (1995) Geochemistry of Lau Basin volcanic rocks: influence of ridge segmentation and arc proximity. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 81:53–75
Perfit MR, Ridley W, Jonasson IR (1999) Geologic, petrologic, and geochemical relationships between magmatism and massive sulfide mineralization along the eastern Galapagos spreading center. Rev Econ Geol 8:75–100
Petersen S, Herzig PM, Hannington MD, Hannington MD, Jonasson IR, Arribas A (2002) Submarine gold mineralization near Lihir Island, New Ireland fore-arc, Papua New Guinea. Econ Geol 97:1795–1813
Petersen S, Monecke T, Westhues A, Hannington MD, Gemmell JB, Sharpe R, Peters M, Strauss H, Lackschewitz K, Augustin N, Gibson H, Kleeberg R (2014) Drilling shallow-water massive sulfides at the Palinuro volcanic complex, Aeolian Island arc, Italy. Econ Geol 109:2129–2158
Petersen S, Krätschell A, Augustin N, Jamieson J, Hein JR, Hannington MD (2016) News from the seabed—geological characteristics and resource potential of deep-sea mineral resources. Mar Policy 70:175–187
Pitcairn IK (2013) Background concentrations of gold in different rock types. Appl Earth Sci 120:31–38
Pokrovski GS, Akinfiev NN, Borisova AY, Zotov AV, Kouzmanov K (2014) Gold speciation and transport in geological fluids: insights from experiments and physical-chemical modelling. Geol Soc Spec Publ 402:9–70
Portnyagin M, Golowin R, Garbe-Schönberg D (2015) Gold-rich Manihiki magmas: a high precision LA-ICP-MS study of glasses obtained during SO-193 and SO-225 expeditions. Statusseminar Meeresforschung mit FS SONNE, Bremen, pp 1–5
Poulsen KH, Hannington MD (1996) Volcanic-associated massive sulphide gold. In: Eckstrand OR, Sinclair WD, Thorpe, RI (eds) Geology of Canadian mineral deposit types. Geology of Canada Series 8:183–196
Prichard HM, Puchelt H, Eckhardt JD, Fisher PC (1996) Platinum-group-element concentrations in mafic and ultramafic lithologies drilled from Hess deep. In: Mevel C, Gillis KM, Allan JF, Meyer PS (eds) Proceedings of the ocean drilling program, scientific results, Vol. 147, College Station Texas, pp 77–90
Reed MH (1982) Calculation of multicomponent chemical equilibria and reaction processes in systems involving minerals, gases and an aqueous phase. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 46:513–528
Reed MH (1998) Calculation of simultaneous chemical equilibria in aqueous-mineral-gas systems and its application to modeling hydrothermal process. Rev Econ Geol 10:109–124
Reed MH, Palandri J (2006) Sulfide mineral precipitation from hydrothermal fluids. In: Vaughan JR (ed) Sulfide mineralogy and geochemistry, reviews in mineralogy. Mineralogical Society of America, Chantilly, pp 609–631
Reed MH, Spycher N (1984) Calculation of pH and mineral equilibria in hydrothermal waters with application to geothermometry and studies of boiling and dilution. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48:1479–1492
Reed MH, Spycher NF (1985) Boiling, cooling and oxidation in epithermal systems: a numerical approach. Rev Econ Geol 2:249–272
Rudnick RL, Gao S (2014) 4.1—composition of the continental crust. In: Holland HD, Turekian KK (eds) Treatise on geochemistry, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 1–51
Schmidt K, Garbe Schönberg D, Hannington MD, Anderson MO, Bühring B, Haase K, Haruel C, Lupton J, Koschinsky A (2017) Boiling vapour-type fluids from the Nifonea vent field (New Hebrides back-arc, Vanuatu, SW Pacific): geochemistry of an early-stage, post-eruptive hydrothermal system. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 207:185–209
Scott SD (1997) Submarine hydrothermal systems. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits, 3rd Edition. Wiley, New York, pp 797–875
Seyfried WE Jr, Ding K (1995) Phase equilibria in subseafloor hydrothermal systems: a review of the role of redox, temperature, pH and dissolved Cl on the chemistry of hot spring fluids at mid-ocean ridges. In: Seafloor hydrothermal systems: physical, chemical, biological, and geological interactions. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 248–272
Seyfried WE Jr, Ding K, Berndt ME (1991) Phase equilibria constraints on the chemistry of hot spring fluids at mid-ocean ridges. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:3559–3580
Seyfried WE Jr, Ding K, Berndt ME, Chen X (1999) Experimental and theoretical controls on the composition of mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal fluids. Rev Econ Geol 8:181–200
Shock E, Canovas P (2010) The potential for abiotic organic synthesis and biosynthesis at seafloor hydrothermal systems. Geofluids 93:1927–1192
Shock EL, Schulte MD (1998) Organic synthesis during fluid mixing in hydrothermal systems. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 103:28513–28527
Shock EL, Sassani DC, Willis M, Sverjensky DA (1997) Inorganic species in geologic fluids: correlations among standard molal thermodynamic properties of aqueous ions and hydroxide complexes. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:907–950
Sillitoe RH, Hannington MD, Thompson JFH (1996) High sulfidation deposits in the volcanogenic massive sulfide environment. Econ Geol 91:204–212
Simmons SF, Brown KL (2006) Gold in magmatic hydrothermal solutions and the rapid formation of a giant ore deposit. Science 314:288–291
Simmons SF, Brown KL, Tutolo BM (2016) Hydrothermal transport of Ag, Au, Cu, Pb, Te, Zn, and other metals and metalloids in New Zealand geothermal systems: spatial patterns, fluid-mineral equilibria, and implications for epithermal mineralization. Econ Geol 111:589–618
Sisson TW (2003) Native gold in a Hawaiian alkalic magma. Econ Geol 98:643–648
Spiess FN, Macdonald KC, Atwater T, Ballard R, Carranzy A, Cordoba D, Cox C, Diaz Garcia VM, Francheteau J, Guerro J, Hawkins J, Haymon R, Hessler R, Juteau T, Kastner M, Larson R, Macdougall JD, Miller S, Normark W, Orcutt J, Rangin C (1980) East Pacific rise: hot springs and geophysical experiments. Science 207:1421–1433
Spycher NF, Reed MH (1989) Evolution of a broadlands-type epithermal ore fluid along alternative P-T paths; implications for the transport and deposition of base, precious, and volatile metals. Econ Geol 84:328–359
Stanton RL (1990) Magmatic evolution and the ore type-lava affiliations of volcanic exhalative ores. Aust Imm M 14:101–107
Stanton RL (1994) Ore elements in arc lavas. Oxford monographs on geology and geophysics. Clarendon, New York, p 404
Sverjensky DA, Shock EL, Helgeson HC (1997) Prediction of the thermodynamic properties of aqueous metal complexes to 1000°C and 5 kb. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 61:1359–1412
Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1985) The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, p 312
Törmänen TO, Koski RA (2005) Gold enrichment and the Bi-Au association in pyrrhotite-rich massive sulfide deposits, Escanaba Trough, Southern Gorda Ridge. Econ Geol 100:1135–1150
Tsunogai U, Ishibashi J, Wakita H, Gamo T, Watanabe K, Kajimura T, Kanayama S, Sakai H (1994) Peculiar features of Suiyo Seamount hydrothermal fluids, Izu-Bonin arc: differences from subaerial volcanism. Earth Planet Sc Lett 126:289–301
Urabe T (1987) The effect of pressure on the partitioning ratios of lead and zinc between vapor and rhyolite melts. Econ Geol 82:1049–1052
Von Damm KL (1990) Seafloor hydrothermal activity: black smoker chemistry and chimneys. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc 18:173–204
Von Damm KL, Parker CM, Lilley MD, Clague DA, Zierenberg RA, Olson EJ, McClain JS (2006) Chemistry of vent fluids and its implications for subsurface conditions at Sea Cliff hydrothermal field, Gorda Ridge. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 7:1–18
Wang Y, Han X, Petersen S, Frische M, Qiu Z, Li H, Li H, Wu Z, Cui R (2017) Mineralogy and trace element geochemistry of sulfide minerals from the Wocan Hydrothermal Field on the slow-spreading Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean. Ore Geol Rev 84:1–19
Watanabe K, Kajimura T (1994) The hydrothermal mineralization at Suiyo Seamount, in the central part of the Izu-Ogasawara arc. Resour Geol 44:133–140
Webber AP, Roberts S, Taylor RN, Pitcairn IK (2013) Golden plumes: substantial gold enrichment of oceanic crust during ridge-plume interaction. Geology 41:87–90
Webber AP, Roberts S, Murton BJ, Mills RA, Hodgkinson MRS (2017) The formation of gold-rich seafloor sulfide deposits: evidence from the Beebe hydrothermal vent field, Cayman Trough. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 18:1–17
Wetzel LR, Shock EL (2000) Distinguishing ultramafic-from basalt-hosted submarine hydrothermal systems by comparing calculated vent fluid compositions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105:8319–8340
Wohlgemuth-Ueberwasser CC, Viljoen F, Petersen S, Vorster C (2015) Distribution and solubility limits of trace elements in hydrothermal black smoker sulfides: an in-situ LA-ICP-MS study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 159:16–41
Wu Z, Sun X, Xu H, Konishi H, Wang Y, Wang C, Dai Y, Deng X, Yu M (2016) Occurrences and distribution of “invisible” precious metals in sulfide deposits from the Edmond hydrothermal field, Central Indian Ridge. Ore Geol Rev 79:105–132
Yang K, Scott SD (1996) Possible contribution of a metal-rich magmatic fluid to a sea-floor hydrothermal system. Nature 383:420–423
Yang K, Scott SD (2002) Magmatic degassing of volatiles and ore metals into a hydrothermal system on the modern sea floor of the eastern Manus back-arc basin, western Pacific. Econ Geol 97:1079–1100
Yang K, Scott SD (2006) Magmatic fluids as a source of metals in seafloor hydrothermal systems. In: Christie DM, Fisher RF, Lee SM, Givens S (eds) Back-arc spreading systems geological, biological, chemical, and physical interactions. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 163–184
Ye J, Shi X, Yang Y, Li N, Liu J, Su W (2012) The occurrence of gold in hydrothermal sulfide at Southwest Indian Ridge 49.6°E. Acta Oceanol Sin 31:72–82
Zierenberg RA, Schiffman P (1990) Microbial control of silver mineralization at a sea-floor hydrothermal site on the northern Gorda Ridge. Nature 348:155–157
Zierenberg RA, Shanks WC III (1986) Isotopic constraints on the origin of the Atlantis II, Suakin and Valdivia brines, Red Sea. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 50:2205–2214
Acknowledgments
Helpful reviews that improved the paper were provided by J.L. Pilote, J. Jamieson, and the editor.
Funding
The research presented in this study was supported by a Helmholtz Postdoctoral Fellowship to SF and a NSERC Discovery Grant awarded to M. Hannington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial handling: G. Beaudoin
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Fuchs, S., Hannington, M.D. & Petersen, S. Divining gold in seafloor polymetallic massive sulfide systems. Miner Deposita 54, 789–820 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-019-00895-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-019-00895-3