Abstract
Social network analysis attracts increasing attention in economic geography. We claim social network analysis is a promising tool for empirically investigating the structure and evolution of inter-organizational interaction and knowledge flows within and across regions. However, the potential of the application of network methodology to regional issues is far from exhausted. The aim of our paper is twofold. The first objective is to shed light on the untapped potential of social network analysis techniques in economic geography: we set out some theoretical challenges concerning the static and dynamic analysis of networks in geography. Basically, we claim that network analysis has a huge potential to enrich the literature on clusters, regional innovation systems and knowledge spillovers. The second objective is to describe how these challenges can be met through the application of network analysis techniques, using primary (survey) and secondary (patent) data. We argue that the choice between these two types of data has strong implications for the type of research questions that can be dealt with in economic geography, such as the feasibility of dynamic network analysis.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ahuja G (2000) Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal study. Adm Sci Q 45: 425–455
Arora A, Fosfuri A, Gambardella A (2001) Markets for technology. MIT Press, Cambridge
Asheim BT, Isaksen A (2002) Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge. J Technol Transf 27: 77–86
Balconi M, Breschi S, Lissoni F (2004) Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Res Policy 33: 127–145
Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509–512
Baum JAC, Shipilov AV, Rowley TJ (2003) Where do small worlds come from? Ind Corp Change 12: 697–725
Bessen J, Hunt RM (2007) An empirical look at software patents. J Econ Manage Strateg 16: 157–189
Blind K, Edler J, Frietsch R, Schmoch U (2006) Motives to patent: empirical evidence from Germany. Res Pol 35: 655–672
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard
Boschma RA (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39: 61–74
Boschma RA, Iammarino S (2007) Related variety and regional growth in Italy: working paper no. 162, SPRU. University of Sussex, Brighton
Boschma RA, Lambooy JG (2002) Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: dynamics of industrial districts. Growth Change 33: 291–311
Boschma RA, Ter Wal ALJ (2007) Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: the case of a footwear district in the South of Italy. Ind Innov 14: 177–199
Breschi S, Lissoni F (2003) Mobility and social networks: local knowledge spillovers revisited: CESPRI, working paper no. 142
Breschi S, Lissoni F (2004) Knowledge networks from patent data: methodological issues and research targets. In: Moed H, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (ed) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S&T systems. Springer, Berlin
Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Soc 110: 349–399
Cantner U, Graf H (2006) The network of innovators in Jena: an application of social network analysis. Res Pol 35: 463–480
Cantner U, Meder A (2006) Determinants influencing the choice of a cooperation partner. Working paper, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena
Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S (2005) Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford
Cooke P (2001) Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind Corp Change 10: 945–974
Cowan R, Jonard N, Özman M (2004) Knowledge dynamics in a network industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71: 469–484
Dahl MS, Pedersen CØR (2004) Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? Res Pol 33: 1673–1686
Ejermo O, Karlsson C (2006) Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Res Pol 35: 412–430
Ellison G, Glaeser EL (1997) Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach. J Polit Econ 105: 889–927
Gay B, Dousset B (2005) Innovation and network structural dynamics: study of the alliance network of a major sector of biotechnology industry. Res Pol 34
Geuna A, Nesta LJJ (2006) University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Res Pol 35: 790–807
Giuliani E (2007) The structure of knowledge networks. Uneven and selective, not pervasive and collective. In: Frenken K (ed) Applied evolutionary economics and economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton
Giuliani E, Bell M (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Res Pol 34: 47–68
Giuri P, Mariani M (2005) Everything you always wanted to know about inventors (but never asked): evidence from the Patval-Eu survey: LEM working paper series 2005–2020
Glückler J (2007) Economic geography and the evolution of networks. J Econ Geogr 7: 619–634
Grabher G, Ibert O (2006) Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. J Econ Geogr 6: 251–271
Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc 78: 1360–1380
Guimera R, Amaral LAN (2004) Modeling the world-wide airport network. Eur Phys J B 38: 381–385
Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strateg Manage J 20: 397–420
Hagedoorn J (2003) Sharing intellectual property rights—an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. Ind Corp Change 12: 1035–1050
Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108: 577–598
Laforgia F, Lissoni F (2006) What do you mean by “Mobile”? Multiple applicant inventors in the European biotech industry: DRUID working paper 06–15
Maggioni MA (2002) Clustering dynamics and the location of high-tech firms. Physica, Heidelberg
Mitchell W, Singh K (1996) Survival of businesses using collaborative relationships to commercialize complex goods. Strateg Manage J 17: 169–195
Morrison A (2008) Gatekeepers of knowledge within industrial districts: who they are, how they interact. Reg Stud 42: 817–835
Oinas P, Malecki EJ (2002) The evolution of technologies in time and space: from national and regional to spatial innovation systems. Int Reg Sci Rev 25: 102–131
Orsenigo L, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M, Bonaccorsi A, Turchetti G (1998) The evolution of knowledge and the dynamics of an industry network. J Manage Gov 1: 147–175
Pakes A (1986) Patents as options: some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica 54: 755–784
Ponds R, Van Oort FG, Frenken K (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Reg Sci 86:423–443 at the 46th ERSA conference, Volos, Greece
Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am J Soc 110: 1132–1205
Snijders TAB (2001) The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In: SobelME, Becker MP (ed) Sociological methodology 2001. Blackwell, Cambridge
Snijders TAB, Steglich CEG, Schweinberger M, Huisman M (2007) Manual for siena version 3: University of Groningen and University of Oxford
Sorensen O (2003) Social networks and industrial geography. J Evol Econ 13: 513–527
Stuart TE (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Adm Sci Q 43: 668–698
Ter Wal ALJ, Boschma RA (2008) Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Reg Stud (forthcoming)
Trajtenberg M (1990) A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J Econ 21: 172–187
Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am Soc Rev 61: 674–698
Van der Valk T (2007) Technology dynamics, networks dynamics and partnering: the case of the Dutch dedicated life sciences firms, Netherlands geographical studies, no. 360. Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht
Verspagen B, Duysters G (2004) The small worlds of strategic technology alliances. Technovation 24: 563–571
Zaheer A, Bell GG (2005) Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strateg Manage J 26: 809–825
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ter Wal, A.L.J., Boschma, R.A. Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci 43, 739–756 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0258-3