Abstract
Diagnostic imaging plays a significant role in both the diagnosis and treatment of complications of pneumonia in children and chest radiography is the imaging modality of choice. Computed tomography (CT) on the other hand, is not currently a first-line imaging tool for children with suspected uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia and is largely reserved for when complications of pneumonia are suspected or there is difficulty in differentiating pneumonia from other pathology. This review outlines the situations where CT needs to be considered in children with pneumonia, describes the imaging features of the parenchymal and pleural complications of pneumonia, discusses how CT may have a wider role in developing countries where human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis are prevalent, makes note of the role of CT scanning for identifying missed foreign body aspiration and, lastly, addresses radiation concerns.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There has been a significant increase in hospital admissions for complicated community-acquired pneumonia both in the developed world and the developing world [1]. Contributing to this is the high incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and tuberculosis in the developing world, resulting in overlapping presentations, treatment failure and difficulty making clinical diagnoses. Children with pneumonia who do not respond appropriately to treatment should be investigated for any suppurative parenchymal complications that may have developed [2]. According to the British Thoracic Society Guidelines [3], if a child remains feverish or unwell 48 h after the start of treatment, the child must be re-evaluated regarding a possible complication. There is a spectrum of suppurative parenchymal complications of pneumonia [4]. The Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America list the following complications associated with community-acquired pneumonia in children [5]: pleural effusion or empyema, pneumothorax, lung abscess, bronchopleural fistula and necrotizing pneumonia. Such complications are reported in up to 53% of children hospitalized with pneumonia [6]. Harris et al. [6] indicate that children are predisposed to more severe forms of lung infection resulting in suppuration and lung abscess. Among predisposing factors are underlying congenital abnormalities such as cysts and sequestrations, bronchiectasis, neurological disorders and immune deficiencies [3]. Also noted are organisms responsible for causing necrotizing pneumonia and lung abscess more frequently -- these include serotypes of pneumococcus and S. aureus [3]. This is due, in part, to a “spectral shift of pneumococcal strains after the introduction of the pneumococcal vaccine and the emergence of methicillin-resistance S. aureus” [7]. In addition, the role played by HIV and tuberculosis as causative agents of necrotizing pneumonia in children living in middle- and low-income countries remains to be described. Identification of patients with suppurative parenchymal and pleural complications of pneumonia is important because prolonged intravenous antibiotic treatment is needed and surgical drainage and decortication must be considered [3].
Diagnostic imaging plays a significant role in both the diagnosis and treatment of complications of pneumonia in children [6]. Plain chest radiography represents the imaging modality of choice for several lung diseases, including community-acquired pneumonia [5]. Computed tomography (CT) on the other hand is not a first-line imaging tool for children with suspected uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia. It is largely reserved for when complications are suspected or where there is difficulty in differentiating community-acquired pneumonia from other pathology. This review will outline the situations where CT needs to be considered in community-acquired pneumonia, describe the imaging features of the parenchymal and pleural complications, discuss how CT may have a larger role to play in developing countries where HIV and tuberculosis are prevalent, note the role of CT scanning when there is a possibility of foreign body aspiration and address radiation concerns.
CT diagnosis of the suppurative parenchymal complications of pneumonia
Expansile pneumonia refers to an increased volume of an involved lobe or segment, with a chest radiograph appearance of dense consolidation causing bulging fissures. Even though expansile pneumonia is not commonly seen in children, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus are known to cause this, with Klebsiella pneumoniae mostly affecting the upper lobes [8] (Fig. 1). Aspergillus fumigatus in immunocompromised and neutropenic children [9, 10] as well as Mycobacteriun tuberculosis can also cause expansile pneumonia [11]. When there is expansile pneumonia but no visible cavitation containing air or an air-fluid level, the variety of underlying parenchymal changes cannot be differentiated from each other on chest radiographs. These can range from exudative consolidation with fluid bronchograms to necrotizing pneumonia and eventual lung abscess and may be accompanied by a pleural effusion or empyema. These pathological changes can be distinguished on CT, allowing for different management options to be considered. In addition, CT can suggest tuberculosis as a possible cause by demonstrating typical lymphadenopathy or indicate a missed/unsuspected foreign body. Necrotizing pneumonia is a severe complication of community-acquired pneumonia resulting in liquefaction and cavitation of lung tissue [12]. The true incidence of this complication in children with community-acquired pneumonia is unknown, but it is increasingly reported, possibly due to early detection from the increased use of chest CT [7]. Lai et al. [7] reported a frequency as high as 34% using chest CT. Lung necrosis is suspected on chest radiographs, but the diagnosis can only be confirmed by CT [3]. Radiologists are clear that CT yields more detailed information concerning chest anatomy and pathology than chest radiography [2]. In the context of diagnosing necrotizing pneumonia or the other complications of community-acquired pneumonia in children, CT has been shown to be the most sensitive and accurate modality, demonstrating pathology before it becomes evident on chest radiographs [2, 4, 7]. Detection and differentiation of pulmonary parenchymal complications require contrast-enhanced CT [6]. In a study by Donnelly et al. [2], all CT examinations performed in children not responding to treatment for community acquired pneumonia (when a chest radiograph was non-contributory) demonstrated at least one significant finding [2]. The suppurative parenchymal complications of pneumonia seen on CT can be considered an evolution of events from exudation, followed by necrosis of the lung, to cavitation or abscess formation and possibly the development of a bronchopleural fistula, but since CT is not performed in a sequential, temporal fashion in children (a single CT scan only represents a moment in time) and since interventions may interrupt the process, each of these complications can be considered individually.
CT findings in complicated pneumonia
Necrotizing pneumonia is diagnosed on CT when a significant portion of consolidated lung shows diffuse or patchy low attenuation and decreased or no enhancement after intravenous contrast medium administration [2, 6, 7, 13] (Fig. 2). Cavitary necrosis is identified as a dominant area of necrosis with a combination of loss of normal parenchymal lung architecture, decreased parenchymal enhancement and development of multiple thin-walled cavities filled with fluid or air and lacking an enhancing border [2] (Fig. 3). Lung abscess is diagnosed on CT when there is a lung cavity surrounded by a well-defined enhancing wall, no central enhancement and either fluid- or air-filled within [2] (Fig. 4). The distinction between necrotizing pneumonia and lung abscess is based on the visualisation of contrast-enhancing walls of an abscess [4] and is important when entertaining aggressive interventional therapy because this can be therapeutic for lung abscess and harmful for necrotizing pneumonia [14]. A bronchopleural fistula can only definitively diagnosed on CT when a communication between the lung and pleural space is visualized directly [2] (Fig. 5). Donnelly et al. [2] reported that of the 56 CT scans performed in children with community-acquired pneumonia failing to respond to treatment, there were 40 with parenchymal complications (28 with decreased parenchymal enhancement or cavitary necrosis, 5 with abscess and 5 with bronchopleural fistula), 37 with pleural complications and 13 with pericardial effusion.
Pleural complications of pneumonia
Pneumonia can also be complicated by pleural effusions that do not resolve with antibiotic therapy and may require surgical drainage or thoracoscopy [2, 3]. It is estimated that while 1% of children with community-acquired pneumonia develop pleural effusions, effusions are seen much more frequently in hospitalized children (up to 40%). According to the British Thoracic Society guidelines [3], when there is persisting fever despite adequate antibiotic treatment, clinicians should suspect the development of an empyema. Lai et al. [7] also report an incidence of 12% to 66% of bronchopleural fistula developing as a complication of necrotizing pneumonia.
Even though pleural effusion is visible on chest radiographs, ultrasound (US) is the recommended method for estimating the amount of fluid [3] (Fig. 6). The size of the effusion is significant when deciding on management [5]. Chest US is also considered superior to chest CT in its ability to demonstrate internal components of an effusion such as loculations and fibrin strands [6, 15] (Fig. 7). The British Thoracic Society guidelines recommend chest US for detecting pleural effusion and guiding drain placement, but indicate that CT with intravenous contrast ‘‘is useful for evaluation of advanced parenchymal disease’’ associated with effusions [6, 16] (Figs. 8 and 9). The Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America note that even though history and physical examination can suggest the possibility of an accompanying effusion in children with community-acquired pneumonia, chest radiographs should be used for confirmation while chest US or CT should only be performed when chest radiography is inconclusive [5] (Fig. 10). Identifying any parenchymal complication such as necrotizing pneumonia or abscess coexisting with an effusion is important because these findings will ensure treatment with a prolonged course of antibiotics [6, 17].
Chest CT is also often performed to delineate the anatomy [6, 16] and for planning all types of surgical treatment including “chest tube drainage (with or without thrombolytics), video-assisted thoracoscopy, or open thoracotomy and decortication” [6].
Bronchopleural fistula develops as a complication of pneumonia if lung necrosis extends through the pleura. Bronchopleural fistula is associated with higher morbidity [18] (Fig. 5).
HIV-infected children
Chest CT scanning is useful in HIV-infected children with acute pneumonia, as many of them have underlying chronic lung disease, including bronchiectasis, or because they may be infected with more than one organism. Many of these children live in areas with a very high incidence of tuberculosis and may either have tuberculosis or a combination of an acute pneumonia and tuberculosis. The symptoms of tuberculosis in HIV-infected children may overlap with signs and symptoms of other infections as well as HIV itself and tuberculosis may therefore be confused with acute pneumonia [19,20,21]. Older HIV-infected children may have also developed lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis, which makes them more vulnerable to acute chest infections [22]. Chest CT scan, therefore. is indicated for diagnosing lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis and features of tuberculosis if it is considered in the differential diagnosis (Fig. 11). Lymphadenopathy associated with lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis does not have the classic rim or ring–like enhancement seen in tuberculosis [23, 24]. The importance of polymicrobial infections in acute pneumonia is well recognized and a significant number of pathogens have been reported as causes of pneumonia in HIV-infected children [25], including combinations of bacterial, viral, Pneumocystis jirovicii and mycobacterial infections. The most common causes of acute bacterial pneumonia in the HIV-infected group remain Streptococcus pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus; amongst gram-negatives, the Klebsiella species, Haemophilus influenza, Escherichia coli and Salmonella Pseudomonas species are important and Mycoplasma is also found [25]. Mortality is increased significantly with increasing numbers of pathogens -- children with polymicrobial pneumonia have a 10-fold greater risk of dying [26]. Because HIV-infected children with pneumonia are more likely to have severe disease and because the rate of complications is higher in HIV-infected children [26], the threshold for performing CT scanning (where available) should be lower than that recommended for children with community-acquired pneumonia who are not immunocompromised.
Tuberculosis - parenchymal complications
Expansile pneumonia caused by M. tuberculosis is difficult to distinguish from other causes of expansile pneumonia because the characteristic tuberculous hilar lymphadenopathy is often masked by the parenchymal disease on chest radiographs. The upper lobes are involved in 75% of such cases. Chest CT may be diagnostic of tuberculosis when there is one of three possible patterns: (1) dense homogeneous opacification with no evidence of liquefaction of the affected lobe and patent airways seen as air bronchograms, (2) homogeneous opacification with areas of necrotic liquefaction with visible glandular obstruction of the airways and absence of air bronchograms or (3) a combination of (1) and (2) [11] (Fig. 12).
Children with tuberculosis may rarely present with mediastinal abscess. These lesions cannot be diagnosed on chest radiographs, but CT scan may demonstrate a mass of peripherally enhancing lymphadenopathy that has undergone central breakdown and developed the appearances of an abscess [27]. These children may present with swinging fever, may not respond to routine antibiotics, and even on tuberculosis treatment may take a very long time to respond.
Foreign body aspiration
Foreign body aspiration often presents with nonspecific respiratory signs and symptoms, which result in diagnostic delays and lead to chronic respiratory morbidity [28]. Even though it is not as common as in adults, bronchial obstruction (e.g., from an aspirated foreign body) should be considered as a cause of persistent pneumonia in children [2]. The diagnosis should also be considered in patients with acute pneumonia, especially if there is significantly reduced ventilation in the area of involvement as seen on chest radiography. Definitive diagnosis of foreign body aspiration is with bronchoscopy, but in the developing world the lack of access to bronchoscopy services [29] means that CT scan may be the main diagnostic modality, especially since organic foreign bodies will not be visible on the plain chest radiographs (Fig. 13). Rarely, children with foreign body aspiration may present with empyema and bronchopleural fistula. In these cases, CT scan is necessary to determine the type and time frame of the intervention that will be needed [30].
Radiation concerns and CT
CT enables detailed analysis of lung anatomy in a similar manner to gross pathology sections but is burdened by a higher radiation dose as compared to chest radiographs. Therefore, the diagnostic benefit and impact on patient management must be weighed against any possible risks. Due to the high diagnostic information that is provided, CT has been utilized in an enthusiastic manner within the last decades – causing it to be a major source of collective radiation dose [31, 32]. This CT overuse instigated a closer look at the doses imparted [33]. Because of the higher radiation sensitivity reported for children as compared to adults, radiation-related cancer has become of particular concern [34]. Therefore, currently there is a tendency to withhold CT from children despite its high diagnostic impact and problem-solving capability. Additionally, there are only sparse recommendations/indications listed for CT, especially in the context of childhood pneumonia [35]. Use of CT in a reasonable manner and through adjustment of scan parameters for pediatric needs allows CT to be applied safely in children. In the following paragraphs, the most important factors influencing CT dose will be listed and discussed as well as simple ways to reduce the radiation burden. A broader overview of the topic is provided in the publication by Sorantin et al. [31]. Furthermore, a rough dose comparison between chest radiographs and CT is provided.
There are several factors influencing CT dose. Appropriate slice thickness selection is a simple way to decrease the dose. There is an inverse relationship between slice thickness and dose for the same image quality. This means that for a given image quality, doubling the slice thickness will result in 50% of the dose. In almost all age ranges, 5-mm slice thickness represents a good choice. Appropriate selection of tube voltage setting represents another challenge. Modern CT systems offer a voltage range from 70 kV to 140 kV. Dose and kV are connected by a quadratic dependency, thus reducing tube voltage from 120 kV to 80 kV in small children, offering a dose reduction of more than 50%. Additionally, due to the changed attenuation (less hard radiation), the inherent tissue contrast is enhanced. A good starting point is 70–80 kV in children up to 2 years old, progressing to 100 kV until adolescence and then increasing to 120 kV in adulthood. Today due to “automatic exposure control” techniques, tube current is fixed by preselecting an explicit image quality – e.g., in some systems this is achieved by reference mA and in others by a noise value. Furthermore, iterative image reconstruction techniques offer another possibility to save approximately 50% of dose as compared to filtered back projection [36,37,38]. The chest is a high-contrast region (air-filled lungs, mediastinal soft tissue, bones) as compared to the abdomen. Therefore, as a rule of thumb, the dose in chest CT should be only 66% of abdominal CT or abdominal CT should have 50% more dose than a chest CT.
The radiation dose of CT has been summarised in several studies including a recent one from Italy by Granata et al. [39]. Applying conversion factors, as released by the ICRP paper 103 [40], to the dose length product (DLP), values from the study by Granata et al. [39] allow the effective dose to be approximated. These data are presented in Table 1 alongside data from a 2016 survey at the institution of one of the authors (E.S.). Since some information from the Italian paper was not available, the effective dose was calculated using the conversion factors for three kV settings (80–120 kV). Chest radiography is one of the most frequently performed imaging studies and therefore a dose comparison between chest radiographs and CT is appropriate. A reasonable, effective dose estimation for an anteroposterior (AP) chest radiograph is 0.01 mSv [41]. According to Table 1, chest CT can be performed in children up to adolescence with an effective dose of 1.0 mSv and therefore corresponds to about 100 AP chest radiographs. The dose for a lateral is approximately two times the dose of an anteroposterior chest radiograph, which would mean that a combination AP and lateral would be 0.03 mSv. The full potential for dose savings in CT is not yet determined and some researchers are experimenting with chest CT examinations at the dose of radiography [42].
Questions arise as to how the optimal dose can be determined. A very simple approach termed the half slice thickness approach has been devised and is in use by the Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Austria. This approach does not need any investment in phantoms or measuring devices. Starting with the standard settings, patients are scanned and images reconstructed in the usual way. Subsequent to this, images should be reconstructed with only half of the chosen slice thickness. Due to the above-mentioned relationship between noise and slice thickness, these images will appear noisier. If the radiologist still finds these images diagnostic, then the excess dose is 100%. At the next examination, the dose is lowered by 20% (e.g., reference mA settings) and the procedure is repeated. After a few examinations, the radiologist will refuse to lower the dose and it is at this point that the optimal dose for that CT protocol is established. A further possibility to save radiation is to target the examination to the clinical question. At follow-up examinations of complicated community-acquired pneumonia (e.g., for abscess, empyema), the tube current can be further reduced (e.g., 30–50% off), since the underlying process is already known and it is possible that the follow-up CT scan is only required to document resolution or any residual disease. New CT technology allows for faster scans at much lower doses, thereby also avoiding the need for anaesthesia and allowing for follow-up scanning to be performed safely, in selected cases [13].
Conclusion
CT needs to be performed at acceptable radiation doses in children and is indicated for diagnosing complications associated with pneumonia, when patients fail to respond to treatment, when chest radiographs are suggestive, when empyema is diagnosed on US and in environments where HIV and tuberculosis are likely coinfections. Even though US is adequate for demonstrating and evaluating effusions, CT is important for demonstrating the underlying lung in search of associated necrosis or abscess formation. CT is superior to chest radiographs and the relatively low theoretical cancer risks need to be appropriately considered against the many advantages it affords the clinician, so as not to deny children the benefits of rapid and accurate diagnosis.
References
Tan Kendrick AP, Ling H, Subramaniam R et al (2002) The value of early CT in complicated childhood pneumonia. Pediatr Radiol 32:16–21
Donnelly LF, Klosterman LA (1998) The yield of CT of children who have complicated pneumonia and noncontributory chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1627–1631
Harris M, Clark J, Coote N et al (2011) British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in children: update 2011. Thorax 66 Suppl 2:ii1-23
Hodina M, Hanquinet S, Cotting J et al (2002) Imaging of cavitary necrosis in complicated childhood pneumonia. Eur Radiol 12:391–396
Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS et al (2011) The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 53:e25–e76
Kurian J, Levin TL, Han BK et al (2009) Comparison of ultrasound and CT in the evaluation of pneumonia complicated by parapneumonic effusion in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1648–1654
Lai SH, Wong KS, Liao SL (2015) Value of lung ultrasonography in the diagnosis and outcome prediction of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia with necrotizing change. PLoS One 10:e0130082
Korvick JA, Hackett AK, Yu VL et al (1991) Klebsiella pneumonia in the modern era: clinicoradiographic correlations. South Med J 84:200–204
Winer-Muram HT, Arheart KL, Jennings SG et al (1997) Pulmonary complications in children with hematologic malignancies: accuracy of diagnosis with chest radiography and CT. Radiology 204:643–649
Caillot D, Couaillier JF, Bernard A et al (2001) Increasing volume and changing characteristics of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis on sequential thoracic computed tomography scans in patients with neutropenia. J Clin Oncol 19:253–259
Goussard P, Gie RP, Kling S et al (2004) Expansile pneumonia in children caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis: clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopic appearances. Pediatr Pulmonol 38:451–455
Sawicki GS, Lu FL, Valim C et al (2008) Necrotising pneumonia is an increasingly detected complication of pneumonia in children. Eur Respir J 31:1285–1291
Spencer DA, Thomas MF (2014) Necrotising pneumonia in children. Paediatr Respir Rev 15:240–245
Hoffer FA, Bloom DA, Colin AA et al (1999) Lung abscess versus necrotizing pneumonia: implications for interventional therapy. Pediatr Radiol 29:87–91
Kim OH, Kim WS, Kim MJ et al (2000) US in the diagnosis of pediatric chest diseases. Radiographics 20:653–671
Balfour-Lynn IM, Abrahamson E, Cohen G et al (2005) BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection in children. Thorax 60(Suppl 1):i1–21
Calder A, Owens CM (2009) Imaging of parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema in children. Pediatr Radiol 39:527–537
Hsieh YC, Wang CW, Lai SH et al (2011) Necrotizing pneumococcal pneumonia with bronchopleural fistula among children in Taiwan. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30:740–744
Madhi SA, Huebner RE, Doedens L et al (2000) HIV-1 co-infection in children hospitalised with tuberculosis in South Africa. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 4:448–454
Walters E, Cotton MF, Rabie H et al (2008) Clinical presentation and outcome of tuberculosis in human immunodeficiency virus infected children on anti-retroviral therapy. BMC Pediatr 8:1
Ren Y, Nuttall JJ, Eley BS et al (2009) Effect of rifampicin on efavirenz pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected children with tuberculosis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 50:439–443
Weber HC, Gie RP, Cotton MF (2013) The challenge of chronic lung disease in HIV-infected children and adolescents. J Int AIDS Soc 16:18633
Andronikou S, Joseph E, Lucas S et al (2004) CT scanning for the detection of tuberculous mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy in children. Pediatr Radiol 34:232–236
Lucas S, Andronikou S, Goussard P et al (2012) CT features of lymphobronchial tuberculosis in children, including complications and associated abnormalities. Pediatr Radiol 42:923–931
Gray DM, Zar HJ (2010) Community-acquired pneumonia in HIV-infected children: a global perspective. Curr Opin Pulm Med 16:208–216
McNally LM, Jeena PM, Gajee K et al (2007) Effect of age, polymicrobial disease, and maternal HIV status on treatment response and cause of severe pneumonia in South African children: a prospective descriptive study. Lancet 369:1440–1451
Gie RP, Goussard P, Kling S et al (2004) Unusual forms of intrathoracic tuberculosis in children and their management. Paediatr Respir Rev 5 Suppl A:S139-141
Karakoc F, Karadag B, Akbenlioglu C et al (2002) Foreign body aspiration: what is the outcome? Pediatr Pulmonol 34:30–36
Goussard P, Gie RP (2016) The need for bronchoscopic services for children in low and middle-income countries. Expert Rev Respir Med 10:477–479
Goussard P, Gie R, Andronikou S et al (2014) Organic foreign body causing lung collapse and bronchopleural fistula with empyema. BMJ Case Rep. doi:10.1136/bcr-2014-204633
Sorantin E, Weissensteiner S, Hasenburger G et al (2013) CT in children--dose protection and general considerations when planning a CT in a child. Eur J Radiol 82:1043–1049
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360
Eslamy HK, Newman B (2011) Pneumonia in normal and immunocompromised children: an overview and update. Radiol Clin N Am 49:895–920
Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A et al (2010) Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:191–199
Tricarico F, Hlavacek AM, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Cardiovascular CT angiography in neonates and children: image quality and potential for radiation dose reduction with iterative image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol 23:1306–1315
Sun J, Peng Y, Duan X et al (2014) Image quality in children with low-radiation chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction. PLoS One 9:e96045
Granata C, Origgi D, Palorini F et al (2015) Radiation dose from multidetector CT studies in children: results from the first Italian nationwide survey. Pediatr Radiol 45:695–705
Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166
Berger RP, Panigrahy A, Gottschalk S et al (2016) Effective radiation dose in a skeletal survey performed for suspected child abuse. J Pediatr 171:310–312
Ernst CW, Basten IA, Ilsen B et al (2014) Pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis: assessment with chest CT at chest radiography dose levels. Radiology 273:597–605
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
None
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Andronikou, S., Goussard, P. & Sorantin, E. Computed tomography in children with community-acquired pneumonia. Pediatr Radiol 47, 1431–1440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3891-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3891-0