Abstract
Mechanobiology is an emerging field at the interface of biology and mechanics, investigating the roles of mechanical forces within biomolecules, organelles, cells, and tissues. As a highlight, the recent advances of micropipette-based aspiration assays and dynamic force spectroscopies such as biomembrane force probe (BFP) provide unprecedented mechanobiological insights with excellent live-cell compatibility. In their classic applications, these assays measure force-dependent ligand–receptor-binding kinetics, protein conformational changes, and cellular mechanical properties such as cortical tension and stiffness. In recent years, when combined with advanced microscopies in high spatial and temporal resolutions, these biomechanical nanotools enable characterization of receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing and subsequent organelle behaviors at single-cellular and molecular level. In this review, we summarize the latest developments of these assays for live-cell mechanobiology studies. We also provide perspectives on their future upgrades with multimodal integration and high-throughput capability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Mechanical milieu such as tensile force, fluid shear stress, compression, and substrate stiffness are increasingly recognized for a critical role in dynamic cellular behaviors including adhesion, migration, and differentiation. For the past decade, micropipette-based aspiration assays have been applied to measuring mechanical properties of cells such as elastic modulus, stiffness, and membrane tension (Gonzalez-Bermudez et al. 2019; Mierke 2021). On one hand, with finely fashioned orifice, the micropipette generates negative pressure that aspirates single cells (Chen et al. 2019; Husson et al. 2011; Swift et al. 2013), spheroids (Blumlein et al. 2017), and microtissues (Guevorkian and Maitre 2017). At the molecular level, dynamic force spectroscopies (DFS) have been developed to interrogate protein dynamics, particularly force-dependent binding kinetics and conformational changes (Dulin et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2015; Ungai-Salanki et al. 2019). The majority of these classical studies were conducted on purified molecular constructs or isolated cellular components (Carrion-Vazquez et al. 2000; Et-Thakafy et al. 2017; Ju et al. 2013).
As an emerging trend in recent years, technical integration such as the combined live-cell micropipette aspiration and DFS such as BFP (Chen et al. 2019; Husson et al. 2011; Ju et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2019) have enabled in situ investigation into cellular and molecular behaviors. The further upgrade with concurrent fluorescence microscopy provides new insights into receptor-mediated bi-directional signal transduction in response to mechanical micro-environment (Arbore et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2019). For example, the binding kinetics and conformational changes on mechanoreceptors can be correlated with the triggered downstream intracellular signaling simultaneously (Ju et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2014). To the scope of this review, we will focus on the recent advancements of BFP and equivalent micropipette-based ultrasensitive force probe techniques in the context of single cell mechanosensing.
Micropipette-based assays
Single micropipette aspiration assays
Micropipette techniques are first used for live-cell microinjection, in vitro fertilization (Hiraoka and Kitamura 2015; Temple-Smith et al. 1985), and more recently, gene and genome editing (Rasys et al. 2019; Shao et al. 2014) (Table 1, 1st row). In a typical application, negative pressure is generated within an open-orifice micropipette to aspirate a single cell, such as an egg of sea urchins (Mitchison and Swann 1954), leukocytes (Lichtman 1973), red blood cell (RBC) (Jay 1973), and platelet (White et al. 1984) to investigates their responses to mechanical stimuli.
The borosilicate micropipette is connected to a reservoir with a micromanipulator that applies negative pressure in a stepwise manner (Fig. 1). The piconewton level force F (10 pN–1 nN, Table 1) on an aspirated cell (termed “Target”) is given by
where Rp is the radius of the micropipette orifice and Δp is the aspiration pressure manipulated by adjusting the height of the reservoir (Hochmuth 2000).
Controlled aspiration pressure prevents over-constrictive manipulation induced physical damage or pre-activation of the target cell. It is crucial to maintain the water level in the reservoir such that the aspiration pressure is kept constant during the experiment. Whenever the water level changes, it is important to re-calibrate the zero pressure thereby ensuring the accuracy of suction pressure (Ju et al. 2017b).
The single micropipette aspiration assays enable real-time cellular observations on morphological changes (Heinrich 2015; Herant et al. 2006) (Table 1, 2nd row), and measurement of mechanical properties such as viscoelasticity (Mohammadalipour et al. 2017; Trickey et al. 2000) (Table 1, 3rd row) and membrane tension (Cox et al. 2016; Portet et al. 2012) (Table 1, 4th row).
The cellular membrane tension T measured in the single micropipette aspiration assay is given by:
where Rc is the radius of the aspirated target cell (Fig. 1). Portet et al. used the technique to validate the correlation between membrane tension and miscibility temperature and provide more insights on how membrane tension regulates the conformation of lipid bilayers (Portet et al. 2012). Meanwhile, Cox et al. showed that applying larger membrane tension via aspiration increased open possibility of the mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo1 (Cox et al. 2016). The finding on Piezo1 being gated by membrane tension supports the ‘Force-From-Lipids’ principle applied to Piezo channels.
When ∆p in Eq. 3 is adjusted to ensure the tongue length of the target cell Lp (aspirated cell portion inside the micropipette) is equal to Rp, the cortical tension of the cell, Tc can thereafter be quantified (Hochmuth 2000) (Fig. 1 and Table1, 5th row).
Given that cortical tension is mediated by the connection between the cell membrane and the actin cytoskeleton in the cortex, the stability of membrane–cytoskeleton linkage in megakaryocytes and lymphocytes can be described and quantitated (Chen et al. 2013; Obeidy et al. 2020). Moreover, the single micropipette aspiration assays were also used to characterize the membrane fragmentation, elongation, and budding (Table1, 6th row). As an example, the preset pressure applies to a megakaryocyte aspirated by a micropipette in order to observe platelet generation (Shin et al. 2011; Smith et al. 1989). This micropipette model mimics the constrictive effect of blood flow during thrombopoiesis nicely. Furthermore, the single micropipette assays can also be applied to microtissues (Table 1, 7th row). For example, a micropipette was used to aspirate an eight-cell stage mouse embryo (Maitre et al. 2015). The cortical tension measurement by micropipettes helped define a new role of actomyosin in generating the compaction and initiating morphogenesis. Amazingly, the micropipette aspiration assays also demonstrated that cortical tension affects cell positioning and fate specification when blastomeres self-organize into a blastocyst (Maitre et al. 2016). A similar system is also used to measure the viscoelasticity of embryonic microtissues (Majkut et al. 2013; Porazinski et al. 2015).
Single micropipettes have also been used as a microfluidic channel to measure the micro-rheology of cells (Table1, 8th row). When the cell is being aspirated into a ligand-coated micropipette, the suction force applied to the cell is given by:
where Ut is the velocity of an interacting cell and Uf is the velocity of a free-moving cell (Shao and Hochmuth 1997). In a similar context, some studies also selectively coated P-selectin on the inner lumen of a micropipette and measured the neutrophil resistant time when applying negative pressure (Pai et al. 2008; Sundd et al. 2008).
Using micropipette aspiration to measure the nuclear stiffness and characterize the nuclear stability represent emerging application to intracellular mechanobiology (Table1, 9th row). Lamins, which form a dense protein network in the inner nuclear membrane, play a critical role in nucleus mechanosensing (Ho and Lammerding 2012). Swift et al. established micropipette assays to aspirate human lung-derived A549 cells with fluorescent labeled nuclear lamins and characterized the mechanical property of the nucleus (Swift et al. 2013). The results revealed that the level of lamin A, which contributes to lineage determination of the stem cell, is scaled with the nuclear stiffness. In addition, cells can be squeezed when moving through three-dimensional tissue. With micropipette aspiration assays, Irianto et al. and Pfeifer et al. observed mechanosensing dynamics of DNA repair proteins and nucleases when being squeezed into the micropipette (Irianto et al. 2017; Pfeifer et al. 2018). Results demonstrated that extracellular pressure from the trans-tissue migration will cause the intranuclear chromatin and DNA damage of cancer cells. The dynamic of the nuclei illustrates the ‘go, damage and grow’ behavior of cancer cells.
Dual micropipette assays
Adding an apposing micropipette, dual micropipette assays can characterize cell–cell or cell–molecule interaction and associated biophysical parameters with controlled engagement or separation (Biro and Maitre 2015; Ju et al. 2017b). As an example, the dual micropipette assay was used to present fungi or bacteria induced chemotaxis on neutrophils (Table 1, 10th row), which quantifies the sensitivity of immune cells to chemoattractant (Francis and Heinrich 2017; Heinrich 2015). The dual micropipette adhesion frequency assays have also been developed to measure ligand–receptor-binding kinetics in two dimensions, or 2D kinetics (Evans et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2016) (Table 1, 11th row). In such system, RBCs and beads were functionalized with the proteins of interest via covalent bonding. The adhesion frequency Pa is enumerated by pinches of RBC cell membrane during repetitive cell–cell touches (Piper et al. 1998) then derive into 2D on- (kon) and off-rates (koff) by a probabilistic model given by
where mr and ml are the respective receptor and ligand densities, tc is the contact time, and Ac is the contact area of two cells (Ju et al. 2017b).
Meanwhile, the dual micropipette has also been implemented to investigate the adhesive behavior of cell–cell interaction (Table 1, 12th row). For example, Obeidy et al. revealed that the modulation on actin-related protein 2/3 complex would reduce the filamentous F-actin formation and cytotoxicity in primary T lymphocytes (Obeidy et al. 2020). The resulting insights into T-cell migration and function inspired alternative treatment for cancer and inflammatory disease. Furthermore, studies also employed a dual micropipette system to investigate the adhesive behaviors of individual microtissue cells from zebrafish embryos (Table 1, 13th row). Maitre et al. showed that embryo cell adhesion is mediated by E-cadherin, which provides the mechanical scaffold for cortical tension to modulate cell sorting during gastrulation (Maitre et al. 2012). With similar assays, Kardash et al. demonstrated that the motility of chemokine-guided germ cells needs the function of Rho GTPases and E-cadherin-mediated-adhesion (Kardash et al. 2010). Both two studies provide more insights into stem-cell differentiation and migration processes.
Multimodal micropipette assays
Micropipette techniques have been further upgraded with multimodalities by combining with external physical electrical, optical and mechanical fields. By integrating an electric circuit of patch clamping, micropipettes have been used to identify mechanosensitive ion channels such as Piezo1 (Cox et al. 2016; Patkunarajah et al. 2020), TRPV4 (Servin-Vences et al. 2017), MscL (Moe and Blount 2005), and characterize their mechano-gating kinetics (Table 1, 14th row). Similarly, by adding a fluorescent light path, the micropipette assays correlated cellular adhesive behaviors with triggered calcium mobilization (Heinrich 2015; Pryshchep et al. 2014) and other intracellular signaling responses (Sasmal et al. 2020) (Table 1, 15th row). Moreover, researchers have combined the micropipette aspiration assays with patch clamping and optical tweezers (OT) setups to study membrane electromechanical properties (Table 1, 16th row). This integrated system can pull cell membrane tethers, measure the cytoskeletal disruption force then correlate with the transmembrane potential (Qian et al. 2004). Ounkomol et al. also combined a micropipette system with atomic force microscopy (AFM) to apply compressive and tensile force horizontally and more importantly, the side view of the experiment provides optical feedback to correct for drifts in longtime experiments (Ounkomol et al. 2009) (Table 1, 17th row). With a unique assembly of ligand coated bead arrays on a commercial cantilever, the hybrid system is capable of interrogating interactions of the same cell with multiple ligand species (Ounkomol et al. 2010). The study clarifies that E- and N-cadherins can readily form specific heterophilic bonds, but less frequently than homophilic bonds of either cadherin.
Dynamic force spectroscopy
DFS techniques are widely used to manipulate, characterize, and visualize the force-dependent binding kinetics with live cells, as well as to investigate protein conformational changes. Seven representative DFS are categorized as ‘Single-cell’ (Fig. 2a–d) or ‘High-throughput capable’ (Fig. 2e–g). Automated precise movement brings ligand-coated force probe (i.e., cantilever in Fig. 2a, beads in Fig. 2b–e and g, and micropillars in Fig. 2f) together with receptor-bearing live cells with controlled force, time, and area. Then, the contacted surface will be applied with piconewton force to modulate the ligand–receptor bond dissociation. Each DFS technique has its distinctive rationale of force application and measurement. Single-cell DFS assays including AFM (Fig. 2a), micropipette-based BFP (Fig. 2b), OT (Fig. 2c), and Magnetic Tweezers (MT; Fig. 2d), measure molecular binding forces one cell at a time (Su and Ju 2018). AFM utilizes a ligand-coated cantilever beam to exert force on a cell that usually spreads on a substrate matrix. The molecular binding force is measured by monitoring the cantilever deflection with a photodiode. Cellular properties, including topography and stiffness, are then evaluated. BFP uses a micropipette to gently aspirate the cell in its native state without pre-activation (Fig. 2b), making this technique compatible with certain mechanosensitive-cell types such as platelets (Ju et al. 2016) and primary T-cells (Liu et al. 2014). OT applies a focal laser beam to generate trapping force and mechanically manipulate beads and cells (Fig. 2c). Comparing to the OT, MT utilizes a gradient magnetic field to manipulate beads and cells to perform controlled interactions (Fig. 2d).
To achieve high-content DFS measurements, acoustic force spectroscopy (AFS, Fig. 2e) was invented to manipulate multiple bead–cell pairs simultaneously with an applied acoustic force field (Romanov et al. 2021). AFS has recently been used to pull membrane tethers on tens to hundreds of cells and measure their viscoelastic properties in a high-throughput manner. In a similar token, traction force microscopy (TFM, Fig. 2f) utilizes bead embedded gel or flexible micro-pillar arrays of 2–20 µm sizes to measure traction force generated during cell adhesion and migration. A more recent advance of soft substrates produced by electron beam lithography enables visualization of cellular mechanosensing at a submicron resolution (Ghassemi et al. 2012; Hanson et al. 2015). Last but not least, double-stranded DNA has been repurposed to measure rupture forces of specific ligand–receptor bonds, termed ‘tension gauge tether’ (TGT, Fig. 2g). The force threshold is tuned by the DNA sequence and length. The upper DNA strand is linked with ligands and binds to corresponding receptors on cells (Jo et al. 2019; Wang 2013; Zhang et al. 2018). In this review, micropipette-based DFS, BFP and its equivalent micropipette-based ultrasensitive force probe techniques will be discussed as their rapid development on live cells manipulation.
Biomembrane force probe (BFP)
BFP was first introduced by Evans et al. (1995) and is thereafter widely implemented to characterize molecular bonds between various proteins. The technique represents an upgraded dual micropipette assay (Fig. 2b) and has become one of the emerging live-cell DFS techniques to interrogate the biomechanical regulation of two-dimensional (2D) ligand–receptor-binding kinetics (Chen et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2014). Compared to the dual micropipette system using beads to measure bond lifetime, BFP has advantages in force, temporal, and spatial resolution. Both purified molecules and molecules on living cells are involved in BFP. Prior to experiments, an RBC is pre-swollen and aspirated by the Probe micropipette with a ligand-coated bead attached to its apex to form a piconewton force sensor (Fig. 3a). The Spring constant of the RBC (kRBC) is calculated from the magnitude of pressure applied and the radii of the orifice (Rp), the Probe bead (Rc) and RBC (R0) itself if the radius of the orifice (Rp) is equal to the aspirated RBC length (Lp):
Normally, the spring constant will be set to 0.25 or 0.3 pN/nm (Ju and Zhu 2017). The apposing Target micropipette aspirates a receptor-bearing living cell and is then driven by a Piezo actuator to impinge the Probe. Then, the sub-piconewton force F exerted by Target is detected by the deflection of the RBC (Δx, Fig. 3b) based on Hooke’s Law:
With repetitive Probe–Target touch cycles, preset piconewton force (–103 pN, Table 2) is applied onto the ligand–receptor bond. The molecular binding dynamics are visualized and depicted by the force spectroscopies in real time. During the experiment, it is assumed that the morphology of the RBC is not dramatically changing over time, otherwise, a fresh RBC needs to be replaced to ensure force accuracy (Ju and Zhu 2017).
Dynamic bond measurement
BFP offers multiple analysis modes (Table 2) including thermal fluctuation (Chen et al. 2008), force-ramp assay, and force-clamp assay (Chen et al. 2017) to measure single bond 2D kinetics, in terms of association (Chen et al. 2008; Li et al. 2019; Luca et al. 2017) and dissociation rate (An et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2019) (Table 2, 1st row), bond lifetime (Chen et al. 2010; Fiore et al. 2014; Ju et al. 2013), and bond stiffness (Chen et al. 2019; Fiore et al. 2014). In the force-clamp assay, BFP is able to measure the bond lifetime of specific ligand–receptor bonds over a range of forces (Table 2, 2nd row). The force vs. bond lifetime curves thereafter reflects the interaction as one of two bond types: slip bond or catch bond. A slip bond has a decreased lifetime along with the rising clamp force, demonstrating a force-weaken interaction, whereas a catch bond has an increased lifetime, demonstrating a force-strengthen interaction. With this force-clamp assay, studies reveal how integrin mediates cell–cell adhesion in a dynamic environment such as cancer cell and endothelial cell (Fiore et al. 2014), leukocyte (Chen et al. 2010), and von Willebrand factor (VWF) and platelets (Ju et al. 2013). Chen et al. applied BFP to discover the catch-slip bond formed between integrin αLβ2, or lymphocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) (Chen et al. 2010). They further revealed the internal catch bond between αA and βA domains in αLβ2 would allosterically affect its binding affinity with ICAM-1. Ju et al. used force clamp DFS in BFP to characterize the catch bond between the A1 domain of VWF and platelets, which provide more structural insight into VWF activation by hemodynamic force of circulation (Ju et al. 2013).
Furthermore, the RBC, the target cell, and ligand–receptor bond in the BFP system can be considered as serially connected springs when stretched. Bond stiffness can be derived from the DFS data to subsequently depict the distinct conformation status of the complex (Chen et al. 2019; Fiore et al. 2014) (Table 2, 3rd row). For example, BFP was applied to analyzing Thy-1–α5β1 interactions on K562 cells. Bond stiffness analysis was so critical that detected Thy-1 also interacted with syndecan-4 receptor to form a trimolecular complex with a catch-bond behavior (Fiore et al. 2014). The finding elucidated how Thy-1 on endothelial cells support the adhesion of cancer cells in a mechanically stressed environment. Besides, by analyzing bond stiffness, lifetime and 2D kinetics, Chen and Ju et al. identified a biomechanically activated intermediate state on platelet integrin αIIbβ3 (Chen et al. 2019). Taken together, these mechanobiology insights inspired new anti-thrombotic strategies (Chen and Ju 2020).
Bi-directional receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing
Recent integrations of concurrent fluorescent imaging in BFP assays enabled new understanding on both ‘outside-in’ (Husson et al. 2011; Ju et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2014) and ‘inside-out’ (Chen et al. 2019; Ju et al. 2017a) cell mechanosensing pathways. Mechanical outside-in signaling describes the receptor-mediated mechanosensing upon the extracellular applied tensile and compressive forces, fluid shear, and transduction towards intracellular space (Chen et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2019). Mechanical cues and milieu are converted into biological signals which trigger downstream intracellular events. When combined with concurrent fluorescence imaging, the BFP is able to provide real-time intracellular event recording alongside external force stimulation (Chen et al. 2015) (Table 2, 4th row). The most common cellular event along with force application is calcium flux, as calcium concentration plays a critical role in integrin activation. These fluorescent BFP assays have demonstrated tensile force triggered T-cell activation and cytotoxicity (Husson et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014). The results revealed that activation of T-cell increased cell stiffness thereby resisted the protrusion (Husson et al. 2011) (Table 2, 5th row). Similarly, fluorescence BFP has been applied to platelet mechanobiology, elucidating their biomechanical activation and aggregation underlying arterial thrombosis (Ju et al. 2016).
On the reverse direction of the mechanical outside-in signaling pathway, the inside-out signaling pathway has recently been demonstrated by multiple BFP experiments and proposed as an emerging concept (Zhu et al. 2019). Inside-out mechanical signaling pathway describes that the intracellular forces, mostly from the cytoskeleton, would allosterically affect endoplasmic and transmembrane domains of surface receptor proteins, further influencing their binding kinetics toward external ligands. In the inside-out signaling pathway, the intracellular forces are generated by a series of interconnected cytoplasmic proteins including filament actin, myosin, both of which support cell migration and adhesion. This inside-out signaling triggered allosteric deformation on transmembrane receptors is possibly ionic flux coupled. Further upgrade into a dual BFP system led to signal crosstalk studies between multiple mechanoreceptors i.e. the GPIbα mediated on inside-out activation of integrin αIIbβ3 (Chen et al. 2019; Ju et al. 2017a) (Table 2, 6th row).
BFP equivalent ultrasensitive force probes
There are also other equivalent force measurement assays to BFP. In dual micropipette assays, one of the micropipettes is fashioned into a radius equal to, or slightly smaller than the radius of the living cell. Such design can translate the living cell inside the micropipette to approach, forming contact, and then retract from the ligand-coated beads aspirated by the apposing micropipette (Table 1, 7th row). With adhesion formed, the clamp force is measured according to Eq. 4 (Shao and Hochmuth 1996). The method is able to quantify the tether formed between T-cell and its antibody IgG (Shao and Hochmuth 1996). Spillmann et al. use the same assay to reveal that the bond formation between β2-integrins on neutrophil and immobilized ICAM-1 is linearly increased with a larger contact area with fixed contact stress, but that increasing contact stress leads to higher rates of bond formation (Spillmann et al. 2004). Both of these two studies provide more insights into neutrophils binding dynamics on vascular walls in physiological conditions.
Discussion
The comparative advantage of micropipette-based assays is that precisely controlled aspiration has controllable and subtle physical damage on living cells. As a result, this advantage enables long-period observation and characterization of mechanosensing behaviors on a variety of cell types. More significantly, such assays have minimized the pre-activation effect on primary cells such as platelets (Ju et al. 2016) and T-cells (Liu et al. 2014), which are naturally mechanosensitive. BFP, the upgraded dual micropipette assay, is a very powerful DFS nanotool to investigate ligand–receptor-binding kinetics with high temporal, and spatial resolution. The recent upgrade with concurrent fluorescent imaging (Chen et al. 2015) and dual BFP setup (Chen et al. 2019; Ju et al. 2017a) further enable the technique to characterize both the outside-in and inside-out mechanosensing (Zhu et al. 2019).
Amongst micropipette-based assays, it is a challenge to quantify intracellular forces due to cell complexity. Meanwhile, throughput is confined as only a single live cell can be manipulated simultaneously. A similar problem also exists amongst BFP and other equivalent assays. To gather sufficient data with statistical significance, the technique is very time-consuming as only one pair of ligand–receptor interaction or one type of intracellular ion flux can be characterized each time (Ju et al. 2017a) which creates the barrier to high-throughput (Chen et al. 2017).
Nevertheless, we still anticipate the rapid development of the aforementioned biomechanical nanotools and their applications with the following future perspective:
Multimodality
The future technical upgrade should involve multimodal integration and combine strengths of micropipette and several DFS techniques to support more comprehensive biomechanical studies. In recent decades, there is an increasing number of assays using OT to trap ligand-coated beads with the target cell (Qian et al. 2004) or bead (Arce et al. 2021; Kim et al. 2010) aspirated on an apposing micropipette to perform force measurements. Micropipette-based assays are advantageous for probing membrane ligand–receptor dynamics with minimized cell drifting, whilst OT could reach intracellular protein and organelle. Thus, the combination of both techniques on live-cell and long-duration DFS experiments could provide more comprehensive understanding of binding dynamics and receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing. Another promising example is fluid force microscopy (FluidFM), which combines fluidic devices with AFM in which the cantilever beam was filled with pressure-controlled external fluid. This FluidFM has been applied to single-cell binding force quantification (Dorig et al. 2013; Potthoff et al. 2012).
High throughput
Current biomechanical measurements on micropipettes and DFS are often performed one cell at a time. The sophisticated experimental procedures are usually labor intensive, leading to a steep learning curve. The recent development of automated aspiration with micropipette-based assays provides a four times faster manipulation velocity (Liu et al. 2019), which guides a pathway to improve the efficiency of current assays. Nevertheless, high-content DFS development is in great need to enhance experimental efficiency and statistical significance. Currently, AFS, TFM, and TGT are promising high-content DFS techniques with 30–50 cells that can be analyzed reliably (Ghassemi et al. 2012; Hanson et al. 2015; Jo et al. 2019; Romanov et al. 2021). However, there are still complementary techniques to the single cell DFS such as BFP and OT due to their bottlenecked force resolution and accuracy.
Move inside the cell
Implementing micropipettes and DFS in understanding intracellular mechanobiology is also a topical area. For instance, the mechanoreceptors such as integrins on live cells transduce extracellular mechanical stimuli, and mediate intracellular signaling. When combined with fluorescence microscopy, DFS techniques are more powerful to characterize the mechanosignaling pathway in both mechanical outside-in and inside-out pathways (Roca-Cusachs et al. 2017; Zhu et al. 2019). Meanwhile, intracellular space contains a large number of adaptor proteins that further translate mechanical cues into biochemical signals and induce nucleus activities. To interrogate these, manipulation needs to happen inside the cell. DFS nanotools are focusing on improving their capabilities towards intracellular measurements. To this end, OT-DFS technologies have rapidly developed to detect intracellular mechanotransduction events at higher spatial and temporal resolutions (McCauley et al. 2019; Venturini et al. 2020). Recent advancement in MT setup also enables intracellular measurement with a higher force and extended working distance (Selvaggi et al. 2018). It is also anticipated that new intracellular protein tracers and force sensors to be developed and combined with DFS. Taken together, these perspective technical advances promise to unearth the unprecedented mechanobiology insights from outside to inside the cell.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
An C, Hu W, Gao J, Ju BF, Obeidy P, Zhao YC, Tu X, Fang W, Ju LA, Chen W (2020) Ultra-stable biomembrane force probe for accurately determining slow dissociation kinetics of PD-1 Blockade antibodies on single living cells. Nano Lett 20:5133–5140
Arbore C, Perego L, Sergides M, Capitanio M (2019) Probing force in living cells with optical tweezers: from single-molecule mechanics to cell mechanotransduction. Biophys Rev 11:765–782
Arce NA, Cao W, Brown AK, Legan ER, Wilson MS, Xu ER, Berndt MC, Emsley J, Zhang XF, Li R (2021) Activation of von Willebrand factor via mechanical unfolding of its discontinuous autoinhibitory module. Nat Commun 12:2360
Biro M, Maitre JL (2015) Dual pipette aspiration: a unique tool for studying intercellular adhesion. Methods Cell Biol 125:255–267
Blumlein A, Williams N, McManus JJ (2017) The mechanical properties of individual cell spheroids. Sci Rep 7:7346
Capecchi MR (1980) High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection of DNA into cultured mammalian cells. Cell 22:479–488
Carrion-Vazquez MOAF, Fisher AFP, MarszalekLiFernandez HJM (2000) Mechanical design of proteins studied by single-moleculeforce spectroscopy and protein engineering. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 74:63–91
Chen W, Evans EA, McEver RP, Zhu C (2008) Monitoring receptor-ligand interactions between surfaces by thermal fluctuations. Biophys J 94:694–701
Chen W, Lou J, Zhu C (2010) Forcing switch from short- to intermediate- and long-lived states of the alphaA domain generates LFA-1/ICAM-1 catch bonds. J Biol Chem 285:35967–35978
Chen Y, Aardema J, Kale S, Whichard ZL, Awomolo A, Blanchard E, Chang B, Myers DR, Ju L, Tran R, Reece D, Christensen H, Boukour S, Debili N, Strom TS, Rawlings D, Vazquez FX, Voth GA, Zhu C, Kahr WH, Lam WA, Corey SJ (2013) Loss of the F-BAR protein CIP4 reduces platelet production by impairing membrane-cytoskeleton remodeling. Blood 122:1695–1706
Chen Y, Liu B, Ju L, Hong J, Ji Q, Chen W, Zhu C (2015) Fluorescence biomembrane force probe: concurrent quantitation of receptor-ligand kinetics and binding-induced intracellular signaling on a single cell. J Vis Exp (102):e52975
Chen Y, Ju LA (2020) Biomechanical thrombosis: the dark side of force and dawn of mechano-medicine. Stroke Vasc Neurol 5:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2019-000302
Chen Y, Ju L, Rushdi M, Ge C, Zhu C (2017) Receptor-mediated cell mechanosensing. Mol Biol Cell 28:3134–3155
Chen Y, Ju LA, Zhou F, Liao J, Xue L, Su QP, Jin D, Yuan Y, Lu H, Jackson SP, Zhu C (2019) An integrin alphaIIbbeta3 intermediate affinity state mediates biomechanical platelet aggregation. Nat Mater 18:760–769
Cox CD, Bae C, Ziegler L, Hartley S, Nikolova-Krstevski V, Rohde PR, Ng CA, Sachs F, Gottlieb PA, Martinac B (2016) Removal of the mechanoprotective influence of the cytoskeleton reveals PIEZO1 is gated by bilayer tension. Nat Commun 7:10366
Dorig P, Ossola D, Truong AM, Graf M, Stauffer F, Voros J, Zambelli T (2013) Exchangeable colloidal AFM probes for the quantification of irreversible and long-term interactions. Biophys J 105:463–472
Dulin D, Berghuis BA, Depken M, Dekker NH (2015) Untangling reaction pathways through modern approaches to high-throughput single-molecule force-spectroscopy experiments. Curr Opin Struct Biol 34:116–122
Et-Thakafy O, Delorme N, Gaillard C, Meriadec C, Artzner F, Lopez C, Guyomarc’h F (2017) Mechanical properties of membranes composed of gel-phase or fluid-phase phospholipids probed on liposomes by atomic force spectroscopy. Langmuir 33:5117–5126
Evans E, Ritchie K, Merkel R (1995) Sensitive force technique to probe molecular adhesion and structural linkages at biological interfaces. Biophys J 68:2580–2587
Evans E, Leung A, Heinrich V, Zhu C (2004) Mechanical switching and coupling between two dissociation pathways in a P-selectin adhesion bond. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11281–11286
Fiore VF, Ju L, Chen Y, Zhu C, Barker TH (2014) Dynamic catch of a Thy-1-alpha5beta1+syndecan-4 trimolecular complex. Nat Commun 5:4886
Francis EA, Heinrich V (2017) Quantifying the sensitivity of human immune cells to chemoattractant. Biophys J 112:834–837
Francis EA, Heinrich V (2018) Extension of chemotactic pseudopods by nonadherent human neutrophils does not require or cause calcium bursts. Sci Signal 11(521):eaal4289
Ghassemi S, Meacci G, Liu S, Gondarenko AA, Mathur A, Roca-Cusachs P, Sheetz MP, Hone J (2012) Cells test substrate rigidity by local contractions on submicrometer pillars. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:5328–5333
Gonzalez-Bermudez B, Guinea GV, Plaza GR (2019) Advances in micropipette aspiration: applications in cell biomechanics, models, and extended studies. Biophys J 116:587–594
Guevorkian K, Maitre JL (2017) Micropipette aspiration: a unique tool for exploring cell and tissue mechanics in vivo. Methods Cell Biol 139:187–201
Hanson L, Zhao W, Lou HY, Lin ZC, Lee SW, Chowdary P, Cui Y, Cui B (2015) Vertical nanopillars for in situ probing of nuclear mechanics in adherent cells. Nat Nanotechnol 10:554–562
Heinrich V (2015) Controlled one-on-one encounters between immune cells and microbes reveal mechanisms of phagocytosis. Biophys J 109:469–476
Herant M, Heinrich V, Dembo M (2006) Mechanics of neutrophil phagocytosis: experiments and quantitative models. J Cell Sci 119:1903–1913
Hiraoka K, Kitamura S (2015) Clinical efficiency of Piezo-ICSI using micropipettes with a wall thickness of 0.625 mum. J Assist Reprod Genet 32:1827–1833
Ho CY, Lammerding J (2012) Lamins at a glance. J Cell Sci 125:2087–2093
Hochmuth RM (2000) Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J Biomech 33:15–22
Huang J, Zarnitsyna VI, Liu B, Edwards LJ, Jiang N, Evavold BD, Zhu C (2010) The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature 464:932–936
Husson J, Chemin K, Bohineust A, Hivroz C, Henry N (2011) Force generation upon T cell receptor engagement. PLoS ONE 6:e19680
Irianto J, Pfeifer CR, Bennett RR, Xia Y, Ivanovska IL, Liu AJ, Greenberg RA, Discher DE (2016) Nuclear constriction segregates mobile nuclear proteins away from chromatin. Mol Biol Cell 27:4011–4020
Irianto J, Xia Y, Pfeifer CR, Greenberg RA, Discher DE (2017) As a nucleus enters a small pore, chromatin stretches and maintains integrity, even with DNA breaks. Biophys J 112:446–449
Jay AW (1973) Viscoelastic properties of the human red blood cell membrane. I. Deformation, volume loss, and rupture of red cells in micropipettes. Biophys J 13:1166–1182
Jo MH, Cottle WT, Ha T (2019) Real-time measurement of molecular tension during cell adhesion and migration using multiplexed differential analysis of tension gauge tethers. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5:3856–3863
Jouhanneau JS, Poulet JFA (2019) Multiple two-photon targeted whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from monosynaptically connected neurons in vivo. Front Synaptic Neurosci 11:15
Ju L, Zhu C (2017) Benchmarks of biomembrane force probe spring constant models. Biophys J 113:2842–2845
Ju L, Dong JF, Cruz MA, Zhu C (2013) The N-terminal flanking region of the A1 domain regulates the force-dependent binding of von Willebrand factor to platelet glycoprotein Ibalpha. J Biol Chem 288:32289–32301
Ju L, Chen Y, Xue L, Du X, Zhu C (2016) Cooperative unfolding of distinctive mechanoreceptor domains transduces force into signals. Elife 5:e15447
Ju L, Chen Y, Li K, Yuan Z, Liu B, Jackson SP, Zhu C (2017a) Dual Biomembrane Force Probe enables single-cell mechanical analysis of signal crosstalk between multiple molecular species. Sci Rep 7:14185
Ju L, Chen Y, Rushdi MN, Chen W, Zhu C (2017b) Two-dimensional analysis of cross-junctional molecular interaction by force probes. Methods Mol Biol 1584:231–258
Kardash E, Reichman-Fried M, Maitre JL, Boldajipour B, Papusheva E, Messerschmidt EM, Heisenberg CP, Raz E (2010) A role for Rho GTPases and cell-cell adhesion in single-cell motility in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 12:47–53 (sup pp 41-11)
Kim J, Zhang CZ, Zhang X, Springer TA (2010) A mechanically stabilized receptor-ligand flex-bond important in the vasculature. Nature 466:992–995
Li Z, Lin J, Sulchek T, Cruz MA, Wu J, Dong JF, Zhu C (2019) Domain-specific mechanical modulation of VWF-ADAMTS13 interaction. Mol Biol Cell 30:1920–1929
Lichtman MA (1973) Rheology of leukocytes, leukocyte suspensions, and blood in leukemia. Possible relationship to clinical manifestations. J Clin Invest 52:350–358
Liu B, Chen W, Evavold BD, Zhu C (2014) Accumulation of dynamic catch bonds between TCR and agonist peptide-MHC triggers T cell signaling. Cell 157:357–368
Liu B, Chen W, Zhu C (2015) Molecular force spectroscopy on cells. Annu Rev Phys Chem 66:427–451
Liu Y, Cui M, Huang J, Sun M, Zhao X, Zhao Q (2019) Robotic micropipette aspiration for multiple cells. Micromachines (Basel) 10(5):348
Luca VC, Kim BC, Ge C, Kakuda S, Wu D, Roein-Peikar M, Haltiwanger RS, Zhu C, Ha T, Garcia KC (2017) Notch-Jagged complex structure implicates a catch bond in tuning ligand sensitivity. Science 355:1320–1324
Maitre JL, Berthoumieux H, Krens SF, Salbreux G, Julicher F, Paluch E, Heisenberg CP (2012) Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 338:253–256
Maitre JL, Niwayama R, Turlier H, Nedelec F, Hiiragi T (2015) Pulsatile cell-autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo. Nat Cell Biol 17:849–855
Maitre JL, Turlier H, Illukkumbura R, Eismann B, Niwayama R, Nedelec F, Hiiragi T (2016) Asymmetric division of contractile domains couples cell positioning and fate specification. Nature 536:344–348
Majkut S, Idema T, Swift J, Krieger C, Liu A, Discher DE (2013) Heart-specific stiffening in early embryos parallels matrix and myosin expression to optimize beating. Curr Biol 23:2434–2439
McCauley MJ, Huo R, Becker N, Holte MN, Muthurajan UM, Rouzina I, Luger K, Maher LJ 3rd, Israeloff NE, Williams MC (2019) Single and double box HMGB proteins differentially destabilize nucleosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 47:666–678
Mierke CT (2021) The micropipette aspiration technique. In: Physics of Cancer, vol 3, 2nd edn. IOP, pp 5-1–5-85
Mitchison J, Swann M (1954) The mechanical properties of the cell surface. J Exp Biol 31:443–460
Moe P, Blount P (2005) Assessment of potential stimuli for mechano-dependent gating of MscL: effects of pressure, tension, and lipid headgroups. Biochemistry 44:12239–12244
Mohammadalipour A, Burdick MM, Tees DFJ (2017) Viscoelasticity measurements reveal rheological differences between stem-like and non-stem-like breast cancer cells. Cell Mol Bioeng 10:235–248
Obeidy P, Ju LA, Oehlers SH, Zulkhernain NS, Lee Q, Galeano Nino JL, Kwan RY, Tikoo S, Cavanagh LL, Mrass P, Cook AJ, Jackson SP, Biro M, Roediger B, Sixt M, Weninger W (2020) Partial loss of actin nucleator actin-related protein 2/3 activity triggers blebbing in primary T lymphocytes. Immunol Cell Biol 98:93–113
Ounkomol C, Xie H, Dayton PA, Heinrich V (2009) Versatile horizontal force probe for mechanical tests on pipette-held cells, particles, and membrane capsules. Biophys J 96:1218–1231
Ounkomol C, Yamada S, Heinrich V (2010) Single-cell adhesion tests against functionalized microspheres arrayed on AFM cantilevers confirm heterophilic E- and N-cadherin binding. Biophys J 99:L100-102
Pai A, Sundd P, Tees DF (2008) In situ microrheological determination of neutrophil stiffening following adhesion in a model capillary. Ann Biomed Eng 36:596–603
Patkunarajah A, Stear JH, Moroni M, Schroeter L, Blaszkiewicz J, Tearle JL, Cox CD, Furst C, Sanchez-Carranza O, Ocana Fernandez MDA, Fleischer R, Eravci M, Weise C, Martinac B, Biro M, Lewin GR, Poole K (2020) TMEM87a/Elkin1, a component of a novel mechanoelectrical transduction pathway, modulates melanoma adhesion and migration. Elife 9:e53308
Pfeifer CR, Xia Y, Zhu K, Liu D, Irianto J, Garcia VMM, Millan LMS, Niese B, Harding S, Deviri D, Greenberg RA, Discher DE (2018) Constricted migration increases DNA damage and independently represses cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 29:1948–1962
Piper JW, Swerlick RA, Zhu C (1998) Determining force dependence of two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding affinity by centrifugation. Biophys J 74:492–513
Porazinski S, Wang H, Asaoka Y, Behrndt M, Miyamoto T, Morita H, Hata S, Sasaki T, Krens SG, Osada Y (2015) YAP is essential for tissue tension to ensure vertebrate 3D body shape. Nature 521:217–221
Portet T, Gordon SE, Keller SL (2012) Increasing membrane tension decreases miscibility temperatures; an experimental demonstration via micropipette aspiration. Biophys J 103:L35-37
Potthoff E, Guillaume-Gentil O, Ossola D, Polesel-Maris J, LeibundGut-Landmann S, Zambelli T, Vorholt JA (2012) Rapid and serial quantification of adhesion forces of yeast and Mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 7:e52712
Pryshchep S, Zarnitsyna VI, Hong J, Evavold BD, Zhu C (2014) Accumulation of serial forces on TCR and CD8 frequently applied by agonist antigenic peptides embedded in MHC molecules triggers calcium in T cells. J Immunol 193:68–76
Qian F, Ermilov S, Murdock D, Brownell WE, Anvari B (2004) Combining optical tweezers and patch clamp for studies of cell membrane electromechanics. Rev Sci Instrum 75:2937–2942
Rasys AM, Park S, Ball RE, Alcala AJ, Lauderdale JD, Menke DB (2019) CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in lizards through microinjection of unfertilized oocytes. Cell Rep 28:2288-2292 e2283
Roca-Cusachs P, Conte V, Trepat X (2017) Quantifying forces in cell biology. Nat Cell Biol 19:742–751
Romanov V, Silvani G, Zhu H, Cox CD, Martinac B (2021) An acoustic platform for single-cell, high-throughput measurements of the viscoelastic properties of cells. Small 17:e2005759
Rosetti F, Chen Y, Sen M, Thayer E, Azcutia V, Herter JM, Luscinskas FW, Cullere X, Zhu C, Mayadas TN (2015) A lupus-associated mac-1 variant has defects in integrin allostery and interaction with ligands under force. Cell Rep 10:1655–1664
Sasmal DK, Feng W, Roy S, Leung P, He Y, Cai C, Cao G, Lian H, Qin J, Hui E, Schreiber H, Adams EJ, Huang J (2020) TCR-pMHC bond conformation controls TCR ligand discrimination. Cell Mol Immunol 17:203–217
Selvaggi L, Pasakarnis L, Brunner D, Aegerter CM (2018) Magnetic tweezers optimized to exert high forces over extended distances from the magnet in multicellular systems. Rev Sci Instrum 89:045106
Servin-Vences MR, Moroni M, Lewin GR, Poole K (2017) Direct measurement of TRPV4 and PIEZO1 activity reveals multiple mechanotransduction pathways in chondrocytes. Elife 6:e21074
Shao JY, Hochmuth RM (1996) Micropipette suction for measuring piconewton forces of adhesion and tether formation from neutrophil membranes. Biophys J 71:2892–2901
Shao JY, Hochmuth RM (1997) The resistance to flow of individual human neutrophils in glass capillary tubes with diameters between 4.65 and 7.75 microns. Microcirculation 4:61–74
Shao Y, Guan Y, Wang L, Qiu Z, Liu M, Chen Y, Wu L, Li Y, Ma X, Liu M, Li D (2014) CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in the rat via direct injection of one-cell embryos. Nat Protoc 9:2493–2512
Shin JW, Swift J, Spinler KR, Discher DE (2011) Myosin-II inhibition and soft 2D matrix maximize multinucleation and cellular projections typical of platelet-producing megakaryocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:11458–11463
Smith CM 2nd, Burris SM, White JG (1989) Micropipette aspiration of guinea pig megakaryocytes: absence of fragmentation and dependence on maturation stage. Blood 73:1570–1575
Spillmann CM, Lomakina E, Waugh RE (2004) Neutrophil adhesive contact dependence on impingement force. Biophys J 87:4237–4245
Su QP, Ju LA (2018) Biophysical nanotools for single-molecule dynamics. Biophys Rev 10:1349–1357
Sundd P, Zou X, Goetz DJ, Tees DF (2008) Leukocyte adhesion in capillary-sized, P-selectin-coated micropipettes. Microcirculation 15:109–122
Swift J, Ivanovska IL, Buxboim A, Harada T, Dingal PC, Pinter J, Pajerowski JD, Spinler KR, Shin JW, Tewari M, Rehfeldt F, Speicher DW, Discher DE (2013) Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation. Science 341:1240104
Temple-Smith P, Southwick G, Yates C, Trounson A, De Kretser D (1985) Human pregnancy by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using sperm aspirated from the epididymis. J in Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 2:119–122
Trickey WR, Lee GM, Guilak F (2000) Viscoelastic properties of chondrocytes from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. J Orthop Res 18:891–898
Ungai-Salanki R, Peter B, Gerecsei T, Orgovan N, Horvath R, Szabo B (2019) A practical review on the measurement tools for cellular adhesion force. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 269:309–333
Venturini V, Pezzano F, Catala Castro F, Hakkinen HM, Jimenez-Delgado S, Colomer-Rosell M, Marro M, Tolosa-Ramon Q, Paz-Lopez S, Valverde MA, Weghuber J, Loza-Alvarez P, Krieg M, Wieser S, Ruprecht V (2020) The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior. Science 370(6514):eaba2644
Wang JHT (2013) Defining single molecular forces required to activate integrin and notch signaling. Science 6135:991–994
White JG, Burris SM, Hasegawa D, Johnson M (1984) Micropipette aspiration of human blood platelets: a defect in Bernard-Soulier’s syndrome. Blood 63:1249–1252
Wu P, Zhang T, Liu B, Fei P, Cui L, Qin R, Zhu H, Yao D, Martinez RJ, Hu W, An C, Zhang Y, Liu J, Shi J, Fan J, Yin W, Sun J, Zhou C, Zeng X, Xu C, Wang J, Evavold BD, Zhu C, Chen W, Lou J (2019) Mechano-regulation of peptide-MHC class I conformations determines TCR antigen recognition. Mol Cell 73:1015-1027e1017
Zhang SQ, Parker P, Ma KY, He C, Shi Q, Cui Z, Williams CM, Wendel BS, Meriwether AI, Salazar MA, Jiang N (2016) Direct measurement of T cell receptor affinity and sequence from naive antiviral T cells. Sci Transl Med 8:341ra377
Zhang Y, Qiu Y, Blanchard AT, Chang Y, Brockman JM, Ma VP, Lam WA, Salaita K (2018) Platelet integrins exhibit anisotropic mechanosensing and harness piconewton forces to mediate platelet aggregation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:325–330
Zhu C, Chen Y, Ju LA (2019) Dynamic bonds and their roles in mechanosensing. Curr Opin Chem Biol 53:88–97
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This work was supported by Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP200101970—L.A.J.), the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia Ideas Grant (APP2003904 – L.A.J.), NSW Cardiovascular Capacity Building Program (Early-Mid Career Researcher Grant—L.A.J.), Sydney Nano Grand Challenge funding (GC-2022 – L.A.J), Sydney Research Accelerator prize (SOAR—L.A.J.), NSW CVRN-VCCRI Research Innovation Grant and Ramaciotti Foundations Health Investment Grant (2020HIG76—L.A.J.). Lining Arnold Ju is an ARC DECRA fellow (DE190100609) and National Heart Foundation Future Leader Level 2 (FLF2 105863).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors co-wrote the paper. L.A.J. supervised the study and wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to participate
We thank Rishabh Jain, Caroline Haoran Song, Peyman Obeidy, Albert Oskuee, Guillaume Troadec for the helpful discussion. We thank the University of Sydney core research facilities—Sydney Manufacturing Hub and Research Prototype Foundry for support of our lab startup.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Special Issue: Nanoengineering for Mechanobiology.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Zhou, F., Guo, Y. et al. Micropipette-based biomechanical nanotools on living cells. Eur Biophys J 51, 119–133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-021-01587-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00249-021-01587-5