Abstract
Elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are frequently not treated with standard immunochemotherapy, and this influences survival negatively. The purpose of this study was to gain more insight into treatment decision-making by hematologists. Case vignettes concerning patients with DLBCL were presented to hematologists in the Netherlands. Patient characteristics (age, comorbidity) differed per case. Respondents were asked in each case if they would treat the patient with curative intent by means of full-dose chemotherapy or chemotherapy with dose reduction or if they would not treat the patient with curative intent. The vast majority of respondents would treat an elderly patient diagnosed with DLBCL without a relevant medical history with full-dose chemotherapy irrespective of age. In the presence of comorbidity, lack of social support, cognitive disorders, and untreated depression dose reductions in advance are frequently applied or patients are not treated with curative intent. This is most pronounced for patients aged older than 80 years. Respondents working in a university hospital more frequently refrain form full-dose chemotherapy with curative intent compared to respondents working in tertiary medical teaching hospitals or general hospitals. Patients without a relevant medical history are generally treated with curative intent irrespective of age. Cognitive disorders, comorbidity, and depression reduce the change of being treated with curative intent. This is most prominent in the eldest patient category.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The incidence of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) increases with age, and currently, the mean age at diagnosis is 66 years [1]. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of aggressive NHL. Due to aging of the population, clinicians will increasingly be confronted with elderly patients diagnosed with DLBCL.
Standard treatment for patients with DLBCL consists of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP). Not only in younger but also in elderly patients, this treatment schedule improves complete remission rates and survival [2–9]. However, in daily practice, elderly patients frequently do not receive standard immunochemotherapy treatment [4, 7, 9–12]. Reasons for suboptimal treatment are comorbidity and poor performance status, but also high age alone is adduced as an argument to refrain from standard treatment [4, 7, 10–12].
Little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on treatment decision-making by clinicians. In a recent survey among hematologists, we observed that comorbidities, cognitive disorders, and functional status are frequently taken into consideration in treatment decision-making [13]. In the second part of this survey, case vignettes of DLBCL patients with varying age and extent of comorbidity were presented to the respondents. By means of case vignettes, more information is gathered about decision-making in the daily clinical practice. Here, we present the results of the second part of this survey.
Methods
Data collection
Hematologists were invited to complete the online questionnaire “Treatment of the elderly with a hematologic malignancy” on behalf of the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial Group for Hemato-Oncology (HOVON). HOVON is a foundation that focuses on improving and promoting treatment methods for adult patients with malignant hematologic disorders [14]. Hematologists were invited to participate through e-mail in November 2011. Non-respondents were sent a reminder e-mail within 2 months.
Study measures
The questionnaire consisted of two parts. The first part contained questions about the importance of various factors that play a role in the decision-making of hematologists regarding treatment with curative intent in elderly patients. The results of this part were described previously [13].
In the second part of the questionnaire, case vignettes were presented to the respondents. The survey contained a total of 11 case vignettes. All cases concerned patients with DLBCL; however, the patient characteristics differed per case. In each case, a distinction was made in three age categories: patients older than 60 years, older than 70 years, and older than 80 years of age. Furthermore, the extent of comorbidity varied per case, ranging from no comorbidity to serious comorbid conditions. Also the social setting differed in the various cases, from living at home without additional care to living in a nursing home. More detailed information about the case vignettes is provided in Appendix I. The respondents were asked in each case if they would treat the patient with curative intent by means of full-dose chemotherapy or chemotherapy with dose reduction or if they would not treat the patient with curative intent.
In addition, the respondents’ age and gender were assessed as well as the type of hospital they work in. In the Netherlands, three types of hospitals can be discriminated: university hospitals, tertiary medical teaching hospitals, and general hospitals. Tertiary medical teaching hospitals are large teaching hospitals, where highly specialized care is provided [15]. In the Netherlands, 41 % of hematologists work in university hospitals, 32 % in tertiary medical teaching hospitals, 22 % in general hospitals, and in 5 % of hematologists it is unknown.
Results
Respondents’ characteristics
Invitations to complete the questionnaire were sent to 255 hematologists. Eighty-six respondents participated in the second part of the survey (33.7 % response rate). Eighty-three respondents fully completed the second part of the survey, and three incomplete questionnaires were returned.
The mean age of the respondents at time of survey was 49.6 years (Table 1). There were more male than female respondents. Of the respondents, 26.7 % worked in a university hospital, 36 % in a tertiary medical teaching hospital, and 37.2 % in a general hospital.
Case vignettes: treatment according to age and comorbidity of patients
The vast majority of respondents would treat an elderly patient diagnosed with DLBCL without a relevant medical history with full-dose chemotherapy irrespective of age (Fig. 1a). However, the percentage decreased from 100 % in “younger” patients to 83 % in patients over 80 years old.
In the presence of mild cognitive impairment, the percentage of patients that would be treated with full-dose chemotherapy decreased in all three age categories, although most patients would still be offered treatment with curative intent (Fig. 1b, c). However, the decrease in treatment with curative intent was more pronounced in elderly patients compared to younger patients.
The majority of respondents would not treat a patient suffering from dementia with full-dose chemotherapy, regardless of age category (Fig. 1d, e). However, younger patients with dementia living at home with a good support system would generally receive chemotherapy with curative intent, while this was not the case in the oldest group of patients (Fig. 1d). Regardless of age, a patient suffering from dementia and living in a nursing home would generally not receive treatment with curative intent (Fig. 1e).
Respondents would not start full-dose chemotherapy in patients with an untreated depression in the majority of cases irrespective of age category (Fig. 1f). In general, if a depression was treated adequately, treatment was not precluded (Fig. 1g).
Patients with a history of diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, and myocardial infarction would be treated with curative intent by most of the respondents. However, the number of patients treated with full-dose chemotherapy declined if there was no social support system or concomitant mild cognitive impairment (Fig. 1h–j). In the event of significant comorbidity, most patients would be treated with curative intent by reduced dose chemotherapy, except for the oldest patient category, which frequently would not be treated with curative intent (Fig. 1k).
Case vignettes: treatment according to type of hospital
Respondents working in a university hospital more frequently refrained from full-dose chemotherapy with curative intent in patients of all age categories compared to respondents working in tertiary medical teaching hospitals or general hospitals (Fig. 2a–c). Hematologists in university hospitals more frequently applied dose reductions when treating with curative intent, and in the eldest patient category, they more frequently did not start treatment with curative intent. No major differences were found between respondents working in tertiary medical teaching hospitals and general hospitals.
Discussion
The aim of the present study was to gain more insight into treatment decision-making by hematologists in DLBCL patients of varying age, comorbidity, and social support by use of case vignettes.
We observed that almost all respondents would treat DLBCL patients without a relevant medical history with curative intent. In the eldest patient category, intentional dose reductions are frequent. This is in line with the results of previous reports [11, 13]. In a recent study among DLBCL patients older than 75 years, dose reductions occurred in 31 % of patients at start of treatment with R-CHOP and age was the most important reason in 27 % of cases [4]. However, in 68 % of patients, there was no clear argumentation.
Furthermore, we found that treatment decision-making is to a large extent influenced by the presence of comorbidity. In case of serious comorbidity, respondents frequently applied dose reductions in advance or refrained from treatment with curative intent. This is in line with the results of the first part of this survey in the same respondents and was also observed is previous studies [5, 9, 13, 16, 17]. In elderly patients, comorbidity is common and a prevalence of up to 87 % in patients aged older than 80 years is described [10]. Comorbidity is associated with lower survival in elderly NHL patients [9, 11, 16–21]. The impaired outcome in patients with comorbidity can not only be the result of the direct impact of comorbidity on outcome but can also be the consequence of less intensive treatment schedules or less treatment tolerability [16, 22].
In addition, the results of this study showed that cognitive impairment has an important influence on treatment decisions. In case of mild cognitive impairment, most patients would be treated with curative intent; however, there was a marked decrease in this percentage in case of dementia. This was most pronounced for the eldest patients above 80 years of age. It has been shown that dementia is associated with an increased mortality rate in NHL patients [9, 23].
Lastly, we observed that depression, especially when not treated adequately, appeared to affect the treatment regime of DLBCL patients. The prevalence of depression in DLBCL patients is high [24]. Moreover, a study among cancer survivors observed increased all-cause mortality in patients with depressive symptoms even after adjustment for major clinical predictors [25]. This might be explained by lower treatment compliance in depressed patients or by a higher incidence of depression in patients with poor performance status [26]. Expected low treatment adherence or worse coping strategies may be reasons for clinicians to treat patients with a depression with adapted chemotherapy schedules.
Interestingly, respondents working in university hospitals seem to treat elderly patients less often with full-dose chemotherapy. This might be the consequence of a referral bias, and possibly these respondents have less experience in treating elderly DLBCL patients.
Respondents declared that comorbidity and cognitive impairment in DLBCL patients largely influence treatment decision-making. In daily clinical practice, the extent of comorbidity and cognitive impairment in a patient is in general judged by the physician without performing a systematic assessment, among others because the latter is time-consuming. Clinical judgment by a physician is however less reliable in detecting geriatric problems compared to a systematic evaluation by comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) [27–31]. However, no large prospective randomized controlled trials have been performed investigating the role of CGA in the treatment of elderly DLBCL patients, and therefore, it is not clear how the results of CGA might influence treatment decision-making.
The strengths of our study are that more information is provided about factors that influence treatment decision-making by clinicians, an important topic in cancer treatment. Furthermore, by presenting case vignettes, various situations that resemble daily clinical practice could be studied. Moreover, hematologists of university, tertiary medical teaching hospitals, and general hospitals participated in the study, making the results generalizable. Possible limitations of our study might be that, even though the response rate was reasonable, especially hematologists with a particular interest in this subject responded. In addition, it cannot be entirely excluded that in clinical practice other treatment decisions are made than that the decisions that were indicated in the cases by respondents. At last, an initial treatment decision is not fixed and it is possible that treatment is for example intensified if treatment tolerability appears to be good.
In conclusion, patients without a relevant medical history are in general treated with curative intent irrespective of age. However, in the presence of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, comorbidity, or depression dose reductions in advance are frequently applied or patients are not treated with curative intent. This is most prominent in the eldest patient category.
References
http://www.seer.cancer.gov. (Accessed September 19th, 2014)
Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2002) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235–242
Feugier P, Van Hoof A, Sebban C et al (2005) Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 23:4117–4126
Boslooper K, Kibbelaar R, Storm H et al (2014) Treatment with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone is beneficial but toxic in very elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based cohort study on treatment, toxicity and outcome. Leuk Lymphoma 55:526–532
Hasselblom S, Stenson M, Werlenius O et al (2012) Improved outcome for very elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era. Leuk Lymphoma 53:394–399
Lee L, Crump M, Khor S et al (2012) Impact of rituximab on treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a population-based analysis. Br J Haematol 158:481–488
Varga C, Holcroft C, Kezouh A et al (2014) Comparison of outcomes among patients aged 80 and over and younger patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population based study. Leuk Lymphoma 55:533–537
Diem S, Ess S, Cerny T, Fruh M, Hitz F (2014) Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in elderly patients: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Intern Med 25:577–582
Tien YY, Link BK, Brooks JM, Wright K, Chrischilles E (2014) Treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the elderly: regimens without anthracyclines are common and not futile. Leuk Lymphoma
Thieblemont C, Grossoeuvre A, Houot R et al (2008) Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in very elderly patients over 80 years. A descriptive analysis of clinical presentation and outcome. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 19:774–779
van de Schans SA, Wymenga AN, van Spronsen DJ, Schouten HC, Coebergh JW, Janssen-Heijnen ML (2012) Two sides of the medallion: poor treatment tolerance but better survival by standard chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol ESMO 23:1280–1286
Peters FP, Lalisang RI, Fickers MM et al (2001) Treatment of elderly patients with intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a retrospective population-based study. Ann Hematol 80:155–159
van der Poel MW, Mulder WJ, Ossenkoppele GJ et al (2014) Comorbidity and treatment decision-making in elderly non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: a survey among haematologists. Neth J Med 72:165–169
http://www.hovon.nl. (Accessed September 7th 2014)
http://www.stz.nl. (Accessed September 7th, 2014)
Wieringa A, Boslooper K, Hoogendoorn M et al (2014) Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP: a population-based cohort study. Br J Haematol 165:489–496
van Spronsen DJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Lemmens VE, Peters WG, Coebergh JW (2005) Independent prognostic effect of co-morbidity in lymphoma patients: results of the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Eur J Cancer 41:1051–1057
Lin TL, Kuo MC, Shih LY et al (2012) The impact of age, Charlson comorbidity index, and performance status on treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Ann Hematol 91:1383–1391
Merli F, Luminari S, Rossi G et al (2014) Outcome of frail elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prospectively identified by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: results from a study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi. Leuk Lymphoma 55:38–43
Janssen-Heijnen ML, van Spronsen DJ, Lemmens VE, Houterman S, Verheij KD, Coebergh JW (2005) A population-based study of severity of comorbidity among patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: prognostic impact independent of International Prognostic Index. Br J Haematol 129:597–606
Kobayashi Y, Miura K, Hojo A et al (2011) Charlson Comorbidity Index is an independent prognostic factor among elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1079–1084
Wildes TM, Ruwe AP, Fournier C et al (2013) Geriatric assessment is associated with completion of chemotherapy, toxicity, and survival in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 4:227–234
Nabhan C, Smith SM, Helenowski I et al (2012) Analysis of very elderly (>/=80 years) non-Hodgkin lymphoma: impact of functional status and co-morbidities on outcome. Br J Haematol 156:196–204
Oerlemans S, Mols F, Nijziel MR, Zijlstra WP, Coebergh JW, van de Poll-Franse LV (2014) The course of anxiety and depression for patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma or diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a longitudinal study of the PROFILES registry. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract
Mols F, Husson O, Roukema JA, van de Poll-Franse LV (2013) Depressive symptoms are a risk factor for all-cause mortality: results from a prospective population-based study among 3,080 cancer survivors from the PROFILES registry. J Cancer Surviv Res Pract 7:484–492
Arrieta O, Angulo LP, Nunez-Valencia C et al (2013) Association of depression and anxiety on quality of life, treatment adherence, and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1941–1948
Wedding U, Kodding D, Pientka L, Steinmetz HT, Schmitz S (2007) Physicians' judgement and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) select different patients as fit for chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 64:1–9
Tucci A, Ferrari S, Bottelli C, Borlenghi E, Drera M, Rossi G (2009) A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy. Cancer 115:4547–4553
Repetto L, Fratino L, Audisio RA et al (2002) Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian Group for Geriatric Oncology Study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 20:494–502
Horgan AM, Leighl NB, Coate L et al (2012) Impact and feasibility of a comprehensive geriatric assessment in the oncology setting: a pilot study. Am J Clin Oncol 35:322–328
Aaldriks AA, Giltay EJ, Nortier JW et al (2014) Prognostic significance of geriatric assessment in combination with laboratory parameters in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 23:1–29
Acknowledgments
We thank all hematologists for their participation in the study.
Disclosure
Celgene B. V financially supported M. W. M. van der Poel, G. J. Ossenkoppele, E. Maartense, P. Wijermans, M. Hoogendoorn, and H. C. Schouten for the participation in an advisory board. Celgene B. V had no further role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Conflict of interest
W. J. Mulder has declared no conflict of interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix I
Appendix I
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
van der Poel, M.W.M., Mulder, W.J., Ossenkoppele, G.J. et al. Factors that influence treatment decision-making in elderly DLBCL patients: a case vignette study. Ann Hematol 94, 1373–1379 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2358-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2358-3