Abstract
Beta-catenin is known to be a vital component of the canonical Wnt signaling cascade, involved in the carcinogenesis of different solid tumors. We aimed to evaluate the effects of Beta-catenin inhibition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in vitro. The small molecular compound MSAB was used to inhibit Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling in a human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative cell line and its effects on cell proliferation, migration, colony formation, apoptosis, as well as radiosensitizing properties were assessed. Significant antineoplastic effects were observed in both cell lines. Interestingly, stronger anti-neoplastic and radiosensitizing effects were observed in the HPV-negative cell line, whereas stronger anti-migratory potential was detected in HPV-positive HNSCC cells. In conclusion, our findings suggest MSAB as a potential therapeutic agent for HNSCC. Further studies are warranted to unravel the mechanistic background of our findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Head and neck cancers account for nearly half a million deaths worldwide and about 900,000 new cases each year, which makes it the sixth most common cancer type [1, 2]. Most important risk factors for HNSCC are alcohol, smoking, and HPV infection [3,4,5]. Due to changes in lifestyle choices and reduced alcohol and tobacco consumption, head and neck cancer incidence rates are declining globally [6]. Nevertheless, HPV-induced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is on the rise [7, 8]. Indeed, HPV positivity in HNSCC is associated with better clinical outcome. Based on this, treatment de-escalation is currently being discussed for this patient group [9, 10]. Still, certain patient subgroups are presented with a very poor prognosis [11, 12]. Furthermore, treatment with cisplatin, commonly used in HNSCC, associates with side effects, such as hearing loss, kidney failure, and neuropathy [13]. In addition, resistance to radiotherapy (RT) is another main contributor to patient mortality and morbidity [14, 15]. This warrants the search for new therapeutic agents that target the distinct characteristics of HNSCC and have synergistic effects with RT. The Wnt/Beta-catenin (WBC) signaling pathway is one promising target that has been identified. This signaling cascade is physiologically active during embryogenesis and is responsible for the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of cells. However, its deregulation contributes to carcinogenesis of different solid tumors. In colorectal cancer, the overactivation of WBC and its involvement in cancer development is well-known [16]. Furthermore, deregulation of WBC signaling seems to contribute to leukemia, melanoma, and breast cancer development [17,18,19,20]. Recent findings suggest the involvement of the WBC pathway in disease progression in HNSCC [21]. Moreover, HPV seems to be involved in the activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, although its consequences in HPV-positive HNSCC are still unknown [22].
Methyl 3-{[(4-methylphenyl)sulfonyl]amino}benzoate (MSAB) binds to Beta-catenin resulting in its ubiquitination, subsequently promoting its proteasomal degradation and, therefore, inhibiting the WBC pathway-induced gene transcription. MSAB was discovered by Hwang et al. in 2016 and showed anti-proliferative effects in Wnt-dependent cancer cell lines. In addition, MSAB showed reduction in the size and weight of Wnt-dependent HCT116, HT115, and H23 xenograft tumors in mouse models [23].
Regarding inhibitors of the WBC pathway, ICG-001 has already been studied for its antineoplastic effects in HPV-negative and HPV-positive cell lines [24]. It showed anti-proliferative and anti-migratory as well as induction of apoptosis and reduction of WBC pathway target genes. ICG-001 inhibits the CREB-binding protein (CBP), which is a transcriptional coactivator and is needed for WBC pathway-dependent gene transcription. Furthermore, PRI-724, an ICG-001 analog, was shown to affect Beta-catenin-dependent gene expression, induce apoptosis and inhibit cell migration in HNSCC cells [25]. However, there is no available data concerning Beta-catenin inhibition by MSAB in HNSCC.
Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the potential antineoplastic and radiosensitizing effects of MSAB in HNSCC cells. The primary aim of the study is to investigate antiproliferation, anti-migratory, pro-apoptotic, and anticlonogenic potential of MSAB in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines. The secondary aim was to assess the synergistic potential of the therapy with MSAB with RT.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
MSAB was evaluated for its effects in an HPV-negative (Cal 27) and HPV-positive (SCC154) cell line. These were acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, USA) and regularly tested for mycoplasma infection. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (P/S) (both Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA), hereafter referred to as culture medium. Cells were cultivated in standard Petri dishes (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) in a humidified environment at 37 °C and 5% CO2 (Hera Cell 240, Heraeus Holding GmbH). Subculturing of cells was done in accordance with ATCC recommendations, whereat 1 × Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) (Gibco, Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and a 0.05% Trypsin—0.53 mM EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was used for washing and detaching the cells. 0.4% Trypan Blue Solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and the Countess FL automated cell counter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) were used for cell counting.
We acquired MSAB from Selleckchem (Houston, Texas, USA). In vitro experiments were performed at least 3 times (unless noted otherwise) and mean values ± standard deviations (SD) were calculated for statistical analysis and subsequent graphical representation.
Cytotoxicity assay
First, a dose–response assay with resazurin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) reduction as a readout was conducted with both cell lines. 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) were used and 5000 cells/well for Cal 27 cells and 20,000 cells/well for SCC154 were seeded in 100 µl culture medium. Next, 24 h after seeding, cells were treated with 100 µl of inhibitor. The inhibitor was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and diluted in culture medium (inhibitor dose ranges: 0.125–2 µM (Cal 27) and 0.375–6 µM (SCC154); five replicates per dose). DMSO-treated cells served as a vehicle-control. Furthermore, for the co-treatment with RT, cells were additionally irradiated with 2, 4, and 6 Gray (Gy) using a YXLON Maxishot unit (YXLON International GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). After 72 h, the culture medium was removed and replaced with 100 µl of 56 µM resazurin solution. Cal 27 and SCC154 cells were then incubated for 90 and 150 min, respectively. Measurements were performed with the TECAN multimode microplate reader (TECAN Spark, Tecan Group Ltd., Maennedorf, Switzerland).
Migration
After the dose–response assay, we performed the migration assay. For this, 24-well plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) were used. To create the initial gap, culture insert wells (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) were utilized. In particular, 75,000 Cal 27 or 350,000 SCC154 cells, respectively, were seeded into each side of the culture inserts. Cells reached 100% confluency before insert removal. DMEM with 1% P/S and 1% FBS was used to starve the cells and limit the proliferation. Once the cells reached 100% confluency, the cell culture inserts were removed. Next, the cells were washed with 1 × DPBS and starvation medium containing various concentrations of MSAB (1 and 4 µM for Cal 27; 0.4 and 0.8 µM for SCC154) was added. The first visualization was performed with the TECAN multimode microplate reader immediately after treatment. Further visualizations were performed after 24 and 48 h for SCC154 cells and after 18 h for Cal 27 cells. Prior to each visualization timepoint, cells were washed and fresh starvation medium containing inhibitor was added. Calculation and analysis of the images was done with ImageJ 1.53e using the Wound Healing Tool. [26].
Colony formation assay
A colony formation assay was used to determine the anticlonogenic potential of the MSAB. As SCC154 cells require cell-to-cell contact to proliferate, the observed results in the clonogenic assay were not reliable nor replicable. The Cal 27 cells were seeded in 12-well plates (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) with a density of 250 cells/well in 1 ml. Twenty-four h after seeding, cells were treated with MSAB at final concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µM, or DMSO (all diluted in 1 ml culture medium). The medium was aspirated 72 h after treatment, and 1 ml fresh culture medium was added. 9 days after seeding, colonies of sufficient size formed. To eliminate floating or dead cells, as well as cell debris, wells were washed with 1 ml 1 × DPBS directly before the measurement. The TECAN multimode microplate reader was used to take pictures of the wells and a self-written macro for ImageJ 1.53e.3 was used to count the generated colonies [26].
Cell apoptosis assay
A caspase-3/7 assay, utilizing the Caspase-Glo 3/7 Assay Kit (Promega, Fitchburg, Wisconsin, USA), was performed to evaluate the pro-apoptotic potential of MSAB. Ninety-six-well plates (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) were used. For this, 5000 cells/well were seeded for Cal 27 cells and 20,000 cells/well for SCC154 in 100 µl culture medium. Then, 24 h after seeding, the culture medium was aspirated and MSAB at various concentrations (0.5 and 1 µM for Cal 27, and 1 and 2 µM for SCC154 diluted in culture medium) was added. Moreover, 40 µM cisplatin served as positive control and DMSO as vehicle-control. For each condition, duplicates were performed. The blanks contained culture medium and MSAB at 2 µM. 100 µl of Caspase-Glo 3/7 Reagent was added 24 h after treatment. Preparation of reagents and workflow was done in accordance with the protocol provided by the vendor. Cells were incubated for 30 min, the supernatant was then transferred to a white, flat-bottomed 96-well plate (Sarstedt, Nürnbrecht, Germany) and the luminescence was measured with the TECAN multimode microplate reader.
Statistics
Statistical significance for the cytotoxicity assay was assessed by a two-way ANOVA. For the migration, clonogenic, and apoptosis assay, the statistical significance was calculated using a one-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses and graphical presentations were conducted with GraphPad Prism version 8.4.2 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, www.graphpad.com). The online tool SynergyFinder (FIMM) was used to evaluate possible synergistic interactions on cell viability between MSAB and irradiation using a zero-interaction potency (ZIP) model [27]. Data is presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD).
Results
MSAB decreases viability in HNSCC cells
A resazurin reduction assay was conducted to evaluate the effect of MSAB on cell viability. Cal 27 cells were treated with a dose range from 0.125 to 2 µM and SCC154 cells were treated with 0.375 to 6 µM of MSAB. Cells were further treated with a radiation dose of 2, 4, or 6 Gy to assess possible radiosensitizing effects in combination with MSAB. 72 h after MSAB and radiation treatment, cell viability was evaluated. Cell viability was decreased in a dose-dependent manner upon MSAB and radiation treatment (Fig. 1a, b). HPV-negative cells showed a higher sensitivity to MSAB treatment compared to the HPV-positive cells with an absolute IC50 of 0.55 µM and 1.34 µM, respectively. Synergy analysis of the effects of concomitant MSAB and radiation revealed overall additive effects were shown for both cell lines, whereat synergistic effects can be observed at a concentration of 0.25 µM MSAB in combination with 2 and 4 Gy in the Cal 27 cell line (Fig. 1c, d). Cell viability data and the zero-interaction potency (ZIP) model were used to calculate synergy scores.
MSAB shows anti-migratory effects in HNSCC cells
Effects of MSAB on migratory potential were assessed by utilizing a wound healing assay, whereat Cal 27 cells were treated with 1 and 4 µM and SCC154 cells with 0.4 and 0.8 µM of inhibitor (Fig. 2a, b). ImageJ was used to analyze pictures taken immediately after treatment and after 18 h for Cal 27 cells and 48 h for SCC154 cells (Fig. 2c, d). For Cal 27 cells average gap closure was reduced to 49.0% and 20.3% at MSAB concentrations of1 and 4 µM, respectively, whereas DMSO-treated cells had a gap closure of 92.8% (Fig. 2a, c). DMSO-treated SCC154 cells showed a gap closure of 75.1% compared to 59.6% and 25.0% at MSAB concentrations of 0.4 and 0.8 µM of MSAB, respectively (Fig. 2b, d). Significant reduction in migratory potential was shown for both cell lines, whereat lower concentrations were needed for SCC154 cells to achieve a similar inhibitory effect.
MSAB decreases clonogenic survival in HPV-negative HNSCC cells
To evaluate the effects of MSAB on clonogenic survival a colony formation assay was performed. Therefore, Cal 27 cells were treated with 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µM of MSAB and vehicle control (Fig. 3). To allow cells to form sufficient colonies, measurement was conducted 8 days after treatment and surviving fractions were calculated. The clonogenic survival of Cal 27 cells was reduced in a dose-dependent manner—the average surviving fraction was reduced to 85.7%, 56.7%, and 22.0% at 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µM of MSAB treatment, respectively (Fig. 3). No reliable results (see methods) were observed in SCC154 cells, probably because of the missing cell-to-cell contact in this assay, which is pivotal for their survival.
MSAB induces apoptosis in HNSCC cells
Cell death was assessed 24 h after treatment via a caspase 3/7 assay. Doses of 0.5 and 1 µM of MSAB were used for Cal 27 cells and 1 and 2 µM for SCC154 cells. Subsequently, cell death was measured via emitted luminescence of cleaved caspase 3/7-substrate (Fig. 4a, b). Cell The cell death induced via caspase 3/7 was significantly increased to 228% / 517% relative light units (RLU) in treated Cal 27 cells at 0.5 µM and 1 µM MSAB, respectively (Fig. 4a). For the HPV-positive cell line SCC154, 155% and 244% RLU were recorded for MSAB doses of 1 and 2 µM, respectively (Fig. 4b).
Discussion
As noted, the global rise of HNSCC incidence can be observed, mostly owing to the rising incidence rates of HPV infection in the USA and Europe [7, 8]. Besides the fact that a subgroup of patients with a HPV-positive disease face a poor prognosis [11, 12], there is a lack of substantial improvements in clinical outcome over the last years for HPV-negative HNSCC patients. On the one hand, this underlines the need for identifying of novel therapeutic targets in HNSCC. To achieve treatment de-escalation, the identification and utilization of new molecular targets specific to this patient group are justified. A promising target in HNSCC is the WBC pathway, which was evaluated in this study. Wnt pathway inhibition shows promising results in different cancer types, and a large number of targets were identified in the Wnt signaling cascade [28, 29]. In addition, recent findings suggest that there might be a link between the overactivation of WBC signaling in HNSCC and the HPV oncogenes E6 and E7 [21, 22]. Therefore, our goal was to assess the role of WBC signaling inhibition by the small molecule MSAB in an HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC cell line.
MSAB decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner and concomitant irradiation enhanced the anti-proliferative effect in both cell lines. Moreover, radiosensitizing effects of MSAB treatment were observed in the HPV-negative cell line, which is especially vital, since resistance to radiation is one of the most common causes of treatment failure in HNSCC [15]. Synergistic effects were observable at 2 Gy which is also favorable from a clinical standpoint, since sessions with doses of 2 Gy are used in the primary care of HNSCC tumors [30]. These results are in line with other studies, that showed increased cytotoxicity of irradiation in combination with a targeted drug in HNSCC cells [24, 31].
In addition, anti-migratory effects of MSAB treatment were observed in both cell lines. Interestingly, a much lower inhibitor concentration was needed for the HPV-positive cell line to achieve comparable results as with the HPV-negative cells. Furthermore, MSAB treatment impaired colony formation in HPV-negative HNSCC cells. As noted, no viable results could be obtained for the SCC154 cells, since these cells need cell–cell contact to proliferate. Similarly, in lung adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and HNSCC a reduced migratory potential upon Wnt pathway inhibition has been observed in the past [24, 25, 32,33,34]. In addition, probing for cleaved Caspase 3/7 upon MSAB revealed induction of apoptosis in treated HNSCC cells. These results are coherent with other studies demonstrating the apoptosis-inducing capability of other experimental compounds in HNSCC [25, 35].
Overall, these results showed considerable antineoplastic effects of Wnt pathway inhibition in HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC cells. Better response to MSAB treatment regarding viability and radiosensitizing effects were observed in the HPV-negative cell line, as well as higher rates of apoptosis. These findings are especially pivotal for HPV-negative tumors due to the aforementioned high radioresistance rates. Conversely, better results regarding migration inhibition were shown for the HPV-positive cell line compared to the HPV-negative cells. The inhibition of the Wnt pathway suggests antineoplastic effects in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC cells, which were also observed in other cancers, where specific inhibitors have already entered clinical phase I and II trials [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50].
MSAB showed promising antineoplastic effects in-vitro and the underlining mechanism could potentially revolve around the inhibition of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Indeed, Liu et al. observed the inhibition of EMT via blockage of the WBC in lung cancer [51]. Some evidence on this interplay were also provided for HNSCC. In particular, the co-expression of Beta-catenin and E-Cadherin, a protein involved in EMT, was associated with clinicopathological parameters in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma [52]. On the contrary, Greco et al. showed that high expression of Beta-catenin was associated with better survival, while E-Cadherin overexpression was an independent risk factor for worse survival outcome [53]. In total, the interplay of EMT and WBC remains unclear in HNSCC, particularly with regards to MSAB-induced antineoplastic effects, and certainly warrants further investigations.
Our study provided some new and interesting, although only preliminary results. An important limitation of this study is the use of only two cell lines. Therefore, additional HPV-negative and HPV-positive HNSCC cell lines should be included to confirm our findings. Furthermore, different timepoints were used in the migration assay, which reduces the comparability of the results from the two cell lines. Nevertheless, a significant anti-migratory effect was observed in both cell lines. In addition, 3D cell assays may give better and more comparable results to physiological conditions. Finally, future studies should provide insights into the mechanistic nature of MSAB treatment in HNSCC. Nevertheless, we provided strong evidence of the effectiveness of MSAB in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC in-vitro. Therefore, our findings could potentially serve as a basis for further studies evaluating the therapeutic potential of MSAB in HNSCC.
The diagnostic and prognostic potential of the WBC pathway in HNSCC is well-established and was shown specifically for HPV-positive disease previously by our group [24]. Indeed, we observed better prognosis in patients with a high expression of a WBC-specific protein. Our current study adds further value in terms of the therapeutic potential of WBC inhibition in HNSCC, as we were able to observe significant antineoplastic effects of MSAB in HPV-associated and HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines in-vitro. Certainly, further studies need to be conducted to validate these preliminary findings.
Conclusions
In the current study, we were able to show antineoplastic effects of Beta-catenin inhibition in HPV-positive and HVP-negative HNSCC cell line models. As these are preliminary, in-vitro results, further validation studies are certainly necessary. Nevertheless, we provided first insights into the therapeutic potential of MSAB in HNSCC. Indeed, MSAB showed anti-proliferative, anti-migratory, and anti-clonogenic effects, as well as apoptosis-inducing and radio-sensitizing properties. Overall, the effect of WBC pathway inhibition by MSAB seems to be higher in Cal 27 cells. These findings suggest MSAB as a potential therapeutic agent in HPV-positive and especially HPV-negative disease, whereas MSAB might serve as a potent inhibitor of migration and, therefore, metastases in HPV-positive HNSCC. Besides validation of our preliminary results, further research is warranted to determine the underlying mechanistics of MSAB treatment as well as to assess its antineoplastic effects in vivo.
References
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F (2019) Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 144:1941–1953. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Hashibe M, Brennan P, Benhamou S, Castellsague X, Chen C, Curado MP, Maso LD, Daudt AW, Fabianova E, Wünsch-Filho V et al (2007) Alcohol drinking in never users of tobacco, cigarette smoking in never drinkers, and the risk of head and neck cancer: pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 99:777–789. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djk179
Wyss A, Hashibe M, Chuang S-C, Lee Y-CA, Zhang Z-F, Yu G-P, Winn DM, Wei Q, Talamini R, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N et al (2013) Cigarette, cigar, and pipe smoking and the risk of head and neck cancers: pooled analysis in the international head and neck cancer epidemiology consortium. Am J Epidemiol 178:679–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt029
Murata M, Takayama K, Choi BC, Pak AW (1996) A nested case–control study on alcohol drinking, tobacco smoking, and cancer. Cancer Detect Prev 20:557–565
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdel-Rahman O, Abdelalim A, Abdoli A, Abdollahpour I, Abdulle ASM, Abebe ND et al (2019) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 5:1749–1768. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996
Mehanna H, Beech T, Nicholson T, El-Hariry I, McConkey C, Paleri V, Roberts S (2013) Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer—systematic review and meta-analysis of trends by time and region. Head Neck 35:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.22015
Jiang H, Livingston M, Room R, Gan Y, English D, Chenhall R (2019) Can public health policies on alcohol and tobacco reduce a cancer epidemic? Australia’s experience. BMC Med 17:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1453-z
Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, Lui VWY, Bauman JE, Grandis JR (2020) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primer 6:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3
Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, Jiang B, Goodman MT, Sibug-Saber M, Cozen W, Liu L, Lynch CF, Wentzensen N, Jordan RC, Altekruse S, Anderson WF, Rosenberg PS, Gillison ML (2011) Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol 29:4294–4301. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596
Brkic FF, Kadletz-Wanke L, Kenner L, Füreder T, Jank B, Brunner M, Heiduschka G (2021) An analysis of distant metastasis cases from HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 49:312–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.012
Brkic FF, Mayer C, Besser G, Altorjai G, Herrmann H, Heiduschka G, Haymerle G, Kadletz-Wanke L (2021) Potential association of the prognostic index and survival in patients with p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Wien Klin Wochenschr 133:1117–1121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01885-0
Mehanna H, Robinson M, Hartley A, Kong A, Foran B, Fulton-Lieuw T, Dalby M, Mistry P, Sen M, O’Toole L, Al Booz H et al (2019) Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Lond Engl 393:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32752-1
Oksuz DC, Prestwich RJ, Carey B, Wilson S, Senocak MS, Choudhury A, Dyker K, Coyle C, Sen M (2011) Recurrence patterns of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after 3D conformal (chemo)-radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol Lond Engl 6:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-54
Hutchinson M-KND, Mierzwa M, D’Silva NJ (2020) Radiation resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dire need for an appropriate sensitizer. Oncogene 39:3638–3649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-020-1250-3
Polakis P (2012) Wnt signaling in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a008052. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008052
Luis TC, Ichii M, Brugman MH, Kincade P, Staal FJT (2012) Wnt signaling strength regulates normal hematopoiesis and its deregulation is involved in leukemia development. Leukemia 26:414–421. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.387
Lim X, Nusse R (2013) Wnt signaling in skin development, homeostasis, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5:a008029. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a008029
Webster MR, Weeraratna AT (2013) A Wnt-er migration: the confusing role of β-catenin in melanoma metastasis. Sci Signal 6:pe11. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2004114
Lin S-Y, Xia W, Wang JC, Kwong KY, Spohn B, Wen Y, Pestell RG, Hung M-C (2000) β-Catenin, a novel prognostic marker for breast cancer: its roles in cyclin D1 expression and cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4262–4266
Paluszczak J (2020) The significance of the dysregulation of canonical Wnt signaling in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Cells 9:723. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030723
Rampias T, Boutati E, Pectasides E, Sasaki C, Kountourakis P, Weinberger P, Psyrri A (2010) Activation of Wnt signaling pathway by human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncogenes in HPV16-positive oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Res MCR 8:433–443. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0345
Hwang S-Y, Deng X, Byun S, Lee C, Lee S-J, Suh H, Zhang J, Kang Q, Zhang T, Westover KD, Mandinova A, Lee SW (2016) Direct targeting of β-Catenin by a small molecule stimulates proteasomal degradation and suppresses oncogenic Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Cell Rep 16:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.071
Brkic FF, Stoiber S, Maier T, Gurnhofer E, Kenner L, Heiduschka G, Kadletz-Wanke L (2022) Targeting Wnt/Beta-catenin signaling in HPV-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pharmaceuticals 15:378. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15030378
Kleszcz R, Szymańska A, Krajka-Kuźniak V, Baer-Dubowska W, Paluszczak J (2019) Inhibition of CBP/β-catenin and porcupine attenuates Wnt signaling and induces apoptosis in head and neck carcinoma cells. Cell Oncol 42:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-019-00440-4
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
Ianevski A, Giri AK, Aittokallio T (2022) SynergyFinder 3.0: an interactive analysis and consensus interpretation of multi-drug synergies across multiple samples. Nucleic Acids Res 50:W739–W743. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac382
Zhang Y, Wang X (2020) Targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer. J Hematol OncolJ Hematol Oncol 13:165. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00990-3
Jung Y-S, Park J-I (2020) Wnt signaling in cancer: therapeutic targeting of Wnt signaling beyond β-catenin and the destruction complex. Exp Mol Med 52:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0380-6
Yeh S-A (2010) Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Semin Plast Surg 24:127–136. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255330
Haas M, Lenz T, Kadletz-Wanke L, Heiduschka G, Jank BJ (2022) The radiosensitizing effect of β-Thujaplicin, a tropolone derivative inducing S-phase cell cycle arrest, in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-derived cell lines. Invest New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-022-01229-3
Li C, Zheng X, Han Y, Lv Y, Lan F, Zhao J (2018) XAV939 inhibits the proliferation and migration of lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells through the WNT pathway. Oncol Lett 15:8973–8982. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.8491
Bilir B, Kucuk O, Moreno CS (2013) Wnt signaling blockage inhibits cell proliferation and migration, and induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer cells. J Transl Med 11:280. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-280
Xu M, Wang S, Song Y, Yao J, Huang K, Zhu X (2016) Apigenin suppresses colorectal cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion via inhibition of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Lett 11:3075–3080. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4331
Yang F, Zeng Q, Yu G, Li S, Wang C-Y (2006) Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibits death receptor-mediated apoptosis and promotes invasive growth of HNSCC. Cell Signal 18:679–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2005.06.015
Array BioPharma (2017) A phase Ib/II multi-center, open label, dose escalation study of WNT974, LGX818 and cetuximab in patients with BRAFV600-mutant KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer harboring Wnt pathway mutations. clinicaltrials.gov
Novartis Pharmaceuticals (2021) A phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of oral LGK974 in patients with malignancies dependent on wnt ligands. clinicaltrials.gov
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center (2016) An open label, non-randomized phase II Trial evaluating WNT974 in patients with metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. clinicaltrials.gov
Redx Pharma Plc (2021) A modular multi-arm, phase 1, adaptive design study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of RXC004, alone and in combination with anti-cancer treatments, in patients with advanced malignancies. clinicaltrials.gov
EDDC (Experimental Drug Development Centre), A*STAR Research Entities (2021) A phase 1A/B study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ETC-1922159 as a single agent and in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumours. clinicaltrials.gov
Curegenix Inc. (2020) A phase 1 open-label dose escalation and dose expansion study of CGX1321 in subjects with advanced solid tumors and phase 1b study of CGX1321 in combination with pembrolizumab in subjects with advanced gastrointestinal tumors. clinicaltrials.gov
Curegenix Inc. (2020) A phase 1 open-label dose escalation study of CGX1321 in subjects with advanced gastrointestinal Tumors. clinicaltrials.gov
Jimeno A, Gordon M, Chugh R, Messersmith W, Mendelson D, Dupont J, Stagg R, Kapoun AM, Xu L, Uttamsingh S, Brachmann RK, Smith DC (2017) A first-in-human phase I study of the anticancer stem cell agent ipafricept (OMP-54F28), a decoy receptor for Wnt ligands, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 23:7490–7497. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2157
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2020) A phase 1 dose escalation study of OMP-54F28 in subjects with solid tumors. clinicaltrials.gov
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2020) A phase 1b dose escalation study of OMP-54F28 in combination with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with previously untreated stage IV pancreatic cancer. clinicaltrials.gov
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2020) A Phase 1b dose escalation study of OMP-54F28 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. clinicaltrials.gov
OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (2020) A phase 1b dose escalation study of OMP-54F28 in combination with sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular cancer. clinicaltrials.gov
Prism Pharma Co., Ltd. (2017) An open-label, dose-escalation phase I/II study of PRI-724 for patients with advanced myeloid malignancies. clinicaltrials.gov
University of Southern California (2017) PRIMIER*: Randomized Phase II Trial of mFOLFOX6/Bevacizumab with or without PRI-724 as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. clinicaltrials.gov
Biosplice Therapeutics, Inc. (2021) A Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, dose-finding study evaluating the safety and pharmacokinetics of orally administered SM08502 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. clinicaltrials.gov
Liu XL, Meng J, Zhang XT, Liang XH, Zhang F, Zhao GR, Zhang T (2019) ING5 inhibits lung cancer invasion and epithelial–mesenchymal transition by inhibiting the WNT/β-catenin pathway. Thorac Cancer 10(4):848–855
Zhu GJ, Song PP, Zhou H, Shen XH, Wang JG, Ma XF, Gu YJ, Liu DD, Feng AN, Qian XY, Gao X (2018) Role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers E-cadherin, N-cadherin, β-catenin and ZEB2 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 15(3):3472–3481
Greco A, De Virgilio A, Rizzo MI, Pandolfi F, Rosati D, de Vincentiis M (2016) The prognostic role of E-cadherin and β-catenin overexpression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 126(4):E148–E155
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Ph.D. Martina Hamböck Grant of the Vienna Medical Chamber (Grant number 0007-WS 2020), as well as from the Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the city of Vienna (Grant number 19066).
Funding
Open access funding provided by Medical University of Vienna. This study was financially supported by the Ph.D. Martina Hamböck Grant of the Vienna Medical Chamber (Grant number 0007-WS 2020), as well as from the Medical Scientific Fund of the Mayor of the city of Vienna (Grant number 19066).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conduction of experiments was performed by TM. The data analysis was performed by TM, SS and EG. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TM and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
According to the guidelines of our institution, the ethical approval is not necessary for in vitro studies on commercially available cell lines.
Conflict of interests
None declared.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maier, T., Stoiber, S., Gurnhofer, E. et al. Inhibition of beta-catenin shows therapeutic potential in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in vitro. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 399–408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07598-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-022-07598-y