Abstract
Introduction
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is a form of adoptive cell therapy that has demonstrated tremendous results in the treatment of hematopoietic malignancies, leading to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of four CD19-targeted CAR-T cell products. With the unprecedented success of CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies, hundreds of preclinical studies and clinical trials are currently undergoing to explore the translation of this treatment to solid tumors. However, the clinical experience in non-hematologic malignancies has been less encouraging, with only a few patients achieving complete responses. Tumor-associated antigen heterogeneity, inefficient CAR-T cell trafficking and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment are considered as the most pivotal roadblocks in solid tumor CAR-T cell therapy.
Materials and methods
We reviewed the relevant literature/clinical trials for CAR-T cell immunotherapy for solid tumors from Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Conclusion
Herein, we provide an update on solid tumor CAR-T cell clinical trials, focusing on the studies with published results. We further discuss some of the key hurdles that CAR-T cell therapy is encountering for solid tumor treatment as well as the strategies that are exploited to overcome these obstacles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
CAR-T cell structure, molecular mechanism and generations
Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most rapidly evolving approach in the field of immunotherapy, named adoptive cell therapy (ACT). In 2017, US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of CD19- targeted CAR-T (Tisagenlecleucel, tisa-cel) for the treatment of young adults with refractory or relapsed (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and of adults with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (Brentjens et al. 2013; Davila et al. 2014; Grupp et al. 2013). However, advances of CAR-T therapy are lagging in solid tumors so far, rendering their application in the management of solid malignancies challenging (Haslauer et al. 2021).
CAR-T cells originate from T cells which have integrated special transgenes into their genome, after a viral or nonviral- mediated gene transfer/ transduction process and clonal expansion. In detail, transferred genes are those that code for CARs, which are recombinant immunoglobulin T-cell receptors (TCRs), able to bind to cell surface antigens (Dotti et al. 2009). CARs are composed of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) extracellular binding domain—containing variable fragment regions of antibodies – and a CD3ζ intracellular signaling moiety (less commonly an FcεRIγ domain), as well as some additional intracellular costimulatory domains, such as, but not limited to CD8, CD27, CD28, CD134, CD137, 41-BB, OX40 (Fig. 1) (Fesnak et al. 2016).
In contrast with TCR, found normally in native T cells, which exert their effects through major histocompatibility complex (MHC) -mediated binding process via antigen presenting cells (APCs), CARs are chimeric receptors, whose binding properties are not MHC/APCs restricted, thus being able to recognize and bind to any surface antigen for which they are specific (Aghajanian et al. 2022). Therefore, CARs are effective targeting tools even for tumor cells, with downregulated MHC expression or dysfunctional antigen processing, properties attributing TCR- related immune evasion. Nonetheless, unlike TCR’s expanded antigen binding range (both surface and intracellular proteins recognition), CARs activity remains limited to extracellular surface antigen recognition (Hanahan 2022).
Regarding CAR-T cells mechanism of action, their activation initiates upon binding of the extracellular scFv CAR portion to a specific tumor tissue antigen, named tumor-associated antigen (TAA). Therefore, upon binding, the intracellular moiety contributes to signal binding transduction, resulting in altered genomic expression through activation of several transcription factors, thus leading, among others, to cytokine production, granzyme and perforin release, death receptor ligand expression and overall CAR-T cell activation, survival, naive immune cell recruitment and antitumor cytotoxic activity (Larson et al. 2021). Apart from those effects, CAR-T cell activation contributes to immune memory formation of the recruiting cells, namely: Regulatory T-cells (Tregs), dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells, CD4 + /CD8 + T cells, macrophages (Dotti et al. 2009; Fesnak et al. 2016).
CAR-T cell design has been comprised of four generations, with increasing target specifity and CAR-T activation effectiveness (Fig. 2). Kuwana et al., followed by Eshhar et al., introduced the first-generation CAR-T cells, reporting the first designed CAR-T cell, with an extracellular domain composed of an scFv portion, combined with an intracellular CD3ζ costimulatory domain (Eshhar et al. 1993; Kuwana et al. 1987). However, CD3ζ-CARs have been shown to elicit a moderate response, in terms of cytokine production and target CAR-T cell activation (Brocker and Karjalainen 1995).
Second-generation CAR-T cells emerged as a CAR-T cell conformation, with enhanced T-cell response, due to a single additional costimulatory intracellular molecule, added in the cytoplasmic moiety of CARs. Namely, some of the most common used molecules are CD28, 4-1BB, DAP10, OX-40 or ICOS, of which special attention should be drawn to CD28, a costimulatory molecule widely used to enhance cytokine production (Interleukin-2; ΙL-2) and overall, CAR-modified T cells expansion and persistence (Journal of Broker 1995; Maher et al. 2002; Savoldo et al. 2011; Kofler et al. 2011).
As a means of further enhancing signal transducing capacity and stimulation targeted effect, CARs got enriched with an additional costimulatory molecule, apart solely from CD28, resulting in a chimeric receptor composed of the following domains: scFV, CD28 or other, OX-40 or 4-1BB, CD3ζ (third-generation CAR-T cells) (Koehler et al. 2007). Hence, in various preclinical models, it was shown that a dual- costimulatory containing CAR is far more efficient than a single- costimulatory CAR, in terms of T-cell signaling strength and persistence (Hombach et al. 2012; Brentjens et al. 2007; Milone et al. 2009).
Recently, a next generation, hence 4th, CAR-T cells have been introduced, which have emerged as a means of rendering CAR- modified T cells resistant to cancer immune evasive activity. TRUCKs (T-cells redirected for universal cytokine killing) are CAR-T cells, which, on top of their CAR receptor, they coexpress an antitumor cytokine gene, predominantly interleukin-12 (IL-12) (Kowolik et al. 2006). Many cancer cells own a distinct phenotypic expression, which alters their stroma properties, thus creating the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME). The cytokine tumor profile attracts many inhibitory native immune cells, which protect tumor from immune recognition. Thus, TRUCKs confront this immunosuppressive tumor property, by expressing immune activating cytokines (i.e., IL-12), thus inducing native immune cell response towards cancer cells which have escaped from CAR-redirected T cells (antigen heterogeneity) and altering microenvironment immune-suppressive cells phenotype (Chmielewski and Abken 2015). More precisely, IL-12 has been shown to have several effects on cancer stroma, namely extracellular matrix alterations (reduced matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), induction of type 1 T helper (Th1) polarisation, NK cells activation, negative effect in angiogenesis and endothelial adhesion molecules (Chmielewski and Abken 2012; Hsieh et al. 1993; Hung et al. 1998; Curtsinger et al. 2003).
CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies
Following the first FDA approval in 2017, six CAR-T cell products have become available to date: Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, Novartis: r/r B-ALL in young adults up to age 25, r/r DLBCL in adults), axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, Kite Pharma: r/r DLBCL, r/r primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL), r/r high grade B-cell lymphoma, and r/r DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma (FL)), brexucabtagene autoleucel (brex-cel, Kite Pharma: r/r mantle cell lymphoma, r/r B-cell precursor ALL in adults), lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel, Juno Therapeutics & Bristol Myers Squibb: r/r DLBCL, r/r high-grade B-cell lymphoma, r/r PMBCL, r/r FL grade 3B), idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, Bristol Myers Squibb: r/r MM) and most recently ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel, J&J, Legend biotech: r/r MM) (Kaliński et al. 1999). The first four CAR-T cell products are directed against CD19 while the latest, namely ide-cel and cilta-cel target B cell maturation antigen (BCMA). Notably, cilta-cel utilizes a dual epitope-binding nanobody-modulated CAR directed against 2 distinct BCMA epitopes (Chung et al. 2021). With regard to the costimulatory intracellular domain, Kite Pharma’s axi-cel and brex-cel utilize CD28 while the rest CAR-T cell designs contain 4-1BB.
Tisagenlecleucel was initially approved for B-ALL patients at 25 years of age or younger. This approval followed crucial studies that reported encouraging results with complete response (CR) rates ranging between 60 and 90% in patients with heavily pretreated, r/r B-ALL. In the next year, 2018, tisa-cel was additionally approved for the treatment of adults with r/r DLBCL, following promising data reported from a phase II clinical trial with an overall response rate (ORR) of 81% and relapse-free survival of 66% at 18 months (Zhao et al. 2018).
Around the same time, axicabtagene ciloleucel was also approved for r/r large B cell lymphoma and DLBCL. The most significant study for this CAR-T cell product was a phase I/II clinical trial demonstrating an ORR of 83% and CR in approximately half of patients with r/r DLBCL with some remissions persisting for over two years (Schuster et al. 2019; Neelapu et al. 2017).
Next, in 2020, brexucabtagene autoleucel was approved for the treatment of r/r mantle cell lymphoma. In a multicenter, phase 2 trial brex-cel showed an ORR of 85% and a CR of 59% at six months, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 61% and 83%, respectively at 12 months (Locke et al. 2019).
Subsequently, in 2021, lisocabtagene maraleucel was approved for r/r adult DLBCL high-grade B-cell lymphoma, PMBCL and FL grade 3B. The most pivotal study regarding liso-cel, was TRANSCEND NHL 001, a phase I open label trial, in which an ORR of 73% and a CR of 53% were achieved, while PFS and OS were 51% and 75% respectively after 6 months (Wang et al. 2020).
Regarding MM, the second most frequently diagnosed hematologic malignancy and the most common type of myeloma (Abramson et al. 2020), two CAR-T cell therapies have been approved as of May 2022 for its r/r forms, with several others being currently investigated. First, idecabtagene vicleucel (March 2021), which in the phase 2 KarMMa trial exhibited an ORR of 73% and a CR of 33% with PFS and OS being 8.8 and 24.8 months respectively (Kumar et al. 2017). Second, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (February 2022), that in the CARTITUDE-1 phase 1b/2 trial demonstrated outstanding results: The ORR was 97%, the stringent CR was 67% and the 12-month progression- free rate was 77% (Munshi et al. 2021).
Despite major breakthroughs in hematological neoplasms, CAR-T cell therapy against solid tumors remains in an infant stage. The most important emerging question that needs to be addressed in the near future is to what extent can CAR-T cell therapy prove beneficial for patients with solid tumors when compared to patients dealing with hematological malignancies. In this review we aim to provide an update of the available evidence from clinical trials of CAR-T cell therapy in solid malignancies and to discuss challenges and future perspectives.
Clinical investigation of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors
The combination of the previous success in hematological malignancies, in which CAR-T cell therapy has documented high rates of long-lasting and persistent disease remission and the novel breakthroughs in preclinical models for solid tumors, has resulted in more than 250 clinical trials utilizing CAR-T cells against solid tumors being conducted by a great number of medical centers internationally. In this part, we evaluate clinical trials with published results (Table 1) focusing on CAR- T cell target antigen, dosage, safety and efficacy while we additionally mention novel targets that exhibit promising features in preclinical studies and are currently explored in several ongoing clinical trials (Fig. 3).
Pancreatic and biliary tract cancer
Currently, in clinical trials with published results the most frequently exploited target antigens are mesothelin (MSLN), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA), claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2, NCT03159819 (Berdeja et al. 2021)) and C133. The majority of these trials utilize a second-generation CAR construct. N. Pang et al. designed a 3rd/ 4th generation of anti-MSLN CAR-T cells (NCT03198546), engineered to secrete IL-17 and chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19) (Zhan et al. 2019). Notably, L. Beatty et al. generated anti-MSLN CAR-T cells, after genetic modification via mRNA electroporation to transiently express a CAR specific for MSLN, as a means of preventing unexpected adverse events (AEs) (Pang et al. 2021). In another phase I clinical trial (NCT02744287), BPX-601 CAR-T cells, a T-cell product engineered to contain a PSCA-CD3ζ CAR was generated in combination with the small molecule rimiducid (Rim)-inducible MyD88/CD40 costimulatory domain, which serves as a molecular “switch” for T-cell activation and proliferation (Beatty et al. 2018; Becerra et al. 2019a).
A dose escalating, multiple injections pattern is the most commonly used strategy regarding CAR-T cell dosage, with a starting point ranging from 1.25 × 106 and 1 × 1010 (fixed dose), after a preparatory lymphodepleting regimen, usually including cyclophosphamide. Other chemotherapy options were nab-paclitaxel and fludarabine. To enhance CAR-T cell trafficking and tumor penetration, percutaneous hepatic artery infusions (HAI) were performed in a number of clinical trials (NCT03198546, NCT02850536). Notably, S. Katz et al., in HITM- SURE clinical trial (Becerra et al. 2019b), along with 3 HAIs of 1 × 1010 cells at weekly intervals, also administered continuous intravenous (IV) infusions of IL-2, similarly to NCT01373047 clinical trial, to support in vivo CAR-T cell persistence. In another clinical trial (NCT01869166) patients additionally received palliative radiotherapy as a means to improve tumor-associated pain (Katz et al. 2020a). Lastly, in one patient with advanced unresectable/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, two different CAR-T cell products, namely anti-EGFR and anti- CD133, were successively administered. This case suggested that repeated infusions of CAR-T cells, as well as successive administration of two different CAR-T cell products, following resistance or relapse to the first target, can potentially prolong CAR-T cell persistence in vivo and PFS (Liu et al. 2020). In the same case, following promising preclinical findings that programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade enhances CAR-T cell function, 2 cycles of anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody were also administered; however, not showcasing significant improvement.
In most clinical trials, a robust peripheral engraftment and expansion of CAR-T cells was observed, whereas CAR-T cell persistence was relatively modest with CAR transgene copy numbers most commonly declining to baseline levels within 1–2 months. Y.Liu et colleagues made a unique, worth-mentioning finding, positively correlating CAR-T cell persistence with the number of central memory T-cells (Tcm) in infused anti-EGFR CAR-T cells (NCT01869166). Besides CAR-T cell persistence, the enrichment of Tcm in infused CAR-T cells was positively related with clinical response (Katz et al. 2020a). Another study provided new insights into CAR-T cell expansion and persistence in vivo and the impact of lymphodepletion on these features. Specifically, anti-MSLN CAR-T cells showed modest expansion and poor persistence and their levels were almost undetectable by day 28 after infusion. Lymphodepleting regimen did improve the initial expansion of CAR-T cells (near-10- fold increase) but had no effect on persistence. Additionaly, in the same study, out of 14 patients evaluated, 10 of them developed antibodies against anti-MSLN CAR- T cells, leading to the hypothesis that anti-CAR antibodies and subsequent immune-mediated elimination of CAR-T cells was a contributing factor to poor persistence; however, there was no correlative evidence that these antibodies directly affected CAR-T cell persistence (Feng et al. 2017).
Regarding clinical responses, stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) were the most common best overall responses with the median PFS typically ranging from 4 to 5 months. Additionally, in a non- negligible number of cases, disease progression was observed. Nevertheless, CRs were not absent. A patient with advanced pancreatic carcinoma that progressed with local lymph node metastasis (sized 24 × 33 mm in positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET- CT) scan) revealed CR via CT staging with the affected lymph node now measuring 8.3 × 9.6 mm after 5 infusions of anti-MSLN CAR-T cells (NCT03198546) (Zhan et al. 2019). Similarly, after 3 HAIs of CEA- specific CAR-T cells, complete metabolic response was established in a patient with poorly differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma and synchronous liver metastases, after constant evaluation with sequential PET-CT imaging (NCT02850536) (Becerra et al. 2019b).
Regarding overall toxicities and AEs, no case of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or neurotoxicity AEs was detected. The most common AEs were reversible, low- grade AEs, namely fever, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and febrile episodes. Unique AEs included grade≥3, cutaneous/ mucosal toxicities (NCT01869166), neutropenia and lymphocytopenia (grade 4 AEs). However, typically, hematological toxicities, while present, were most probably related to the conditioning regimen. Additionally, post-infusion AEs including upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, C-reactive protein (CRP) and IL-6 increase were also observed (NCT01935843) (Haas et al. 2019). Notably, in a specific clinical trial (NCT01869166), on-target/off-tumor toxicity occurred with anti-EGFR CAR-T cell therapies, as EGFR is present in most normal epithelial cells. Characteristically, two of the treated patients developed clinically manageable pleural effusion and pulmonary interstitial exudation toxicities (Katz et al. 2020a).
Colorectal cancer
To date, clinical trials with published results in colorectal cancer (CRC) mainly utilize CEA as the TAA in CAR-T cell engineering. In C-9701 and C-9702, the first human clinical trials of CAR-T cells for solid tumors and specifically CRC, the exploited target-antigen was tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 (TAG-72). Most recently, antigens including natural killer group 2d (NK2GD) and guanylyl cyclase 2C (GUCY2C) are some of the most prominent novel targets based on preclinical studies (Feng et al. 2018; Deng et al. 2019), and several clinical trials exploiting these TAAs are currently ongoing. Furthermore, according to recent evidence, doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1)-targeted CAR-T cells effectively eradicate primary and metastatic colon cancer cells, rendering DCLK1 a promising target for future endeavors (Magee et al. 2018).
In the majority of clinical trials with published results, researchers utilize first or second-generation CAR constructs. Notably, Zhang et al., in a trial with enrolled CRC patients (NCT02349724), suggested that third generation of CAR with CD28 and CD137 signaling did not exhibit enhanced cytokine excretion and cytotoxicity profile than second generation with CD28 signaling (Sureban et al. 2019).
The most frequently tested CAR-T cell dosage scheme is centered on IV or successive dose-escalating HAIs, with a starting point ranging from 1 × 105 to − 1 × 1010 (fixed dose) and an ending point of 5 × 1010. Concurrently, in most clinical trials, preconditioning regimens including cyclophosphamide and/ or fludarabine, are co-administered. In two clinical trials (NCT01373047, NCT01212887), patients also received IL-2 systemic infusions, as a means of promoting CAR-T cells peripheral blood expansion. Moreover, based on the previously established ability of interferons to upregulate TAG-72 expression, in C-9701 and C-9702 trials, researchers co- administered interferon-alpha (IFN-α), along with each dose of anti-TAG-72 CAR-T cells. Unfortunately, the data that emerged from these two trials were insufficient to demonstrate whether IFN-α co-administration led to significant TAG-72 expression upregulation to overcome the immune-evading mechanism of antigen-loss escape (Zhang et al. 2017). Remarkably, in HITM-SIR (NCT02416466) phase 1b clinical trial, researchers decided to explore the safety and potential tumoricidal synergism of Selective Internal Radiation (SIR)-Sphere brachytherapy following CEA- specific CAR-T HAI, acknowledging the established synergistic interaction between immunotherapy and radiation. Specifically, radiation therapy, through tumor lysis and antigen release, may promote the immune system to enable CAR-T cells or form a favorable cytokine milieu (Hege et al. 2017). However, further studies are required to confirm the potential additive or synergistic role of SIR to CAR-T cell therapy.
In most clinical trials, relatively poor CAR-T cell engraftment and persistence was observed. Specifically, peripheral persistence was mostly short- termed, with CAR-T cell levels declining to baseline after a few weeks. More specifically, in C-9701 and C-9702 trials, rapid CAR-T cells clearance was partly attributed to the immunogenicity of anti-TAG-72 CAR-T cells resulting in the induction of interfering antibodies against the TAG-72 binding domain (Zhang et al. 2017). Thistlethwaite et al. indicated that high intensity pre-conditioning chemotherapy led to elevated levels of systemic IFNγ and IL-6, suggesting successful CAR-T cell immune activation in vivo and therefore, significantly higher anti-CEA CAR-T cell engraftment levels (Katz et al. 2020b). Interestingly, Zhang et al. inferred that the CAR-T cells second infusion could achieve similar levels of CAR-T cells expansion and persistence as the first administration. The same researchers tested Flow Cytometry (FCM) for CAR-T cells detection in peripheral blood, using a novel reagent (Protein L) or a recombinant CEA protein with His tag. However, CAR-T cells in peripheral blood were detected only by a sensitive method using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but not by FCM (Sureban et al. 2019).
In the majority of clinical trials, no remarkable clinical responses were documented, while the best overall response was stable disease. Katz et al. estimated neutrophil:lymphocyte ratios (NLR) changes as a measure of early CAR-T clinical response, since high NLR is associated with poor prognosis. It was shown that patients with serologic responses, that is, a decreasing trend of serum CEA antigen, were more likely to present a statistically significant NLR fold- change (Thistlethwaite et al. 2017).
Concerning overall safety, CAR-T cell therapy for CRC was well tolerated, with typically limited serious AEs. The most common AEs were manageable, low- grade AEs, namely fever, fatigue and mild liver enzyme elevations. Remarkably, patients in HITM and HITM-SIR, despite receiving a very high intratumoral dose of CAR-T cells in the liver, showed no evidence of severe hepatic or biliary toxicity (Hege et al. 2017). Unique AEs included hypereosinophilia, edema, colitis, hypertensive crisis (NCT02416466) and duodenal perforation (NCT02349724). A case of grade 3 fever and tachycardia (NCT01373047) was attributed to systemic IL-2 administration. Moreover, in the same trial, instances of platelet count decrease, alopecia and gastritis were related to lymphodepletion. Distinctively, in C-9701 and C-9702, researchers observed low-grade CRS events, most prominently in patients with high CAR-T cell engraftment levels. Last, in one clinical trial the development of on-target off-tumor toxicity, clinically evident as transient, acute respiratory toxicity in patients (CEA expression in lung epithelium), resulted in the premature termination of the trial (NCT01212887) (Katz et al. 2020b).
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Based on encouraging preclinical results regarding 7 × 19 CAR-T cells (CAR-T cells concomitantly secreting IL-7 and CCL19) (Katz et al. 2015; Adachi et al. 2018; June et al. 2018), this phase I clinical trial (NCT03198546) was designed to evaluate safety, tolerability and clinical activity of IV/intratumoral/intrahepatic artery injections of glypican-3 (GPC3)- / MSLN- specific 7 × 19 CAR-T cells in 6 patients with immunohistochemically confirmed GPC3- or MSLN- positive advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), pancreatic cancer, or ovarian cancer (OC), following lymphodepleting chemotherapy (Zhan et al. 2019). No grade 2–4 AEs, CRS, neurotoxicity or treatment- related death was documented. One pancreatic cancer patient achieved CR, one HCC patient achieved PR and two other HCC patients reached SD. The above results demonstrate the reasonable therapeutic potential of 7 × 19 CAR-T cell therapy for advanced solid tumors with GPC3/MSLN expression. Despite disease burden and active metastatic sites, some patients reached SD state, with negligible treatment- related AEs.
In this single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02541370), adults with histologically confirmed and measurable advanced HCC received CD133-directed CAR-T cells (CART-133) infusions, using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation approach. Primary endpoints of the study included safety and tolerability in phase I and PFS and OS in phase II (Carl et al 2018). Considering safety, most of the documented AEs were of grade 2, while no CRS or neurologic toxicity events were documented. Of 21 evaluable patients, 1 presented a PR, 14 had SD for 2 to 16.3 months, and 6 had PD after CAR-T cell infusion, while the median OS was 12 months and the median PFS was 6.8 months. However, 4 patients with pre-existing obstructive lesions experienced hyperbilirubinemia (grade 3 toxicity). Notably, therapy outcome was correlated with the baseline levels of several proangiogenic and inflammatory factors: VEGF, soluble VEGF receptor 2 (sVEGFR2), stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1, and endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) counts, while also, an association between changes of these biomarkers’ levels after CART-133 infusion with survival was observed. In conclusion, in patients with advanced HCC, CART-133 cell therapy demonstrates manageable safety profile and promising antitumor activity.
Lung cancer
Until recently, CAR- T cell clinical trials with published results in patients with lung cancer have been focusing on malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), using mainly MSLN as the target antigen. However, fibroblast activating protein (FAP) has also been tested as a potential TAA in patients with MPM, while EGFR has been exploited in patients with non- small cell lung cancer. In most clinical trials, the specific generation of CAR-T cells is not announced, while three of them utilize second generation CAR constructs (NCT01355965, NCT01897415, NCT01722149). In two consecutive phase I clinical trials from the University of Pennsylvania (NCT01355965, NCT01897415), in an effort to reduce the associated safety concerns of viral vector gene transduction- based CAR-T cells engineering, anti-MSLN CAR-T cells were constructed using RNA electroporation (Huang et al. 2020; Dai et al. 2020). Similarly, Zhang et al. exploited the non-viral piggyBac transposon system to generate EGFR-specific CAR-T cells, due to the fact that, compared to viral systems, the piggyBac transposon system is a simpler, more economical, and alternative way to introduce CAR transgenes into T cells (Zhao et al. 2010). Lastly, Ghosn et al. engineered anti-MSLN CAR-T cells, incorporating inducible caspase-9 (iCasp9) safety switch, as a means of limiting on-target, off-tumor toxicities of CAR-T cell therapy (Carpenito et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2021).
Regarding CAR-T cell dosage scheme, the most frequently used was a dose- escalating pattern, with a starting point ranging from 1 × 105 to 2 × 108 CAR- T cells were predominantly administered intravenously or directly intrapleurally. Notably, in a recent clinical trial (NCT02414269) with MPM patients, interventional radiologists administered the respective CAR-T cell product through intracavitary or intratumoral infusions under image guidance by computed tomography or ultrasound (Carpenito et al. 2009). In another clinical trial (NCT01722149), due to safety concerns, lowered doses of FAP-specific CAR-T cells (1 X 106 cells/kg) were injected and despite this subtherapeutic dose, CAR-T cells expansion in systemic circulation was documented (Ghosn et al. 2022; Adusumilli et al. 2019).
To date, there is not enough evidence about CAR-T cell expansion and persistence in patients with MPM; however few clinical trials have made certain observations regarding these aspects. First, in the clinical trials utilizing RNA-electroporation for anti-MSLN CAR-T cell construction (NCT01355965, NCT01897415), poor CAR-T cell persistence with rapidly decreasing levels was in agreement with the biodegradable nature of the MSLN transgene (Schuberth et al. 2013; Petrausch et al. 2012). Nevertheless, the same researchers suggested that it is possible to administer multiple, more frequent injections of CAR-T cells that only temporarily express the selected transgenes, avoiding the accumulation of tolerized CAR-T cells and therefore enhancing both CAR-T cell persistence and tumor infiltration (Huang et al. 2020). Second, Zhang et al. attributed the lack of CAR-T cell expansion to several potential factors such as the low level of the antigen-bearing cells in the blood, the relatively low dose of CAR-T cells adopted in this trial (NCT03182816) (Zhao et al. 2010).
Regarding clinical activity, SD and PR were the most frequent best overall responses. In addition, disease progression was reported in a significant number of cases. Complete PET scan- based metabolic response was achieved in two patients receiving iCasp9 anti-MSLN CAR-T cells.
Concerning overall safety and tolerbality, CAR-T cell therapy for lung cancer was well-tolerated, showcasing a good safety profile in most instances, with grade 1 to grade 3 fever being the most frequent AE. Interestingly, Beatty et al. indicated that the mRNA electroporation design can reduce potential “on target/ off- tumor” toxicities due to the transient expression of the CAR in T cell surface (Huang et al. 2020). Lastly, there was a case of a severe anaphylactic reaction occurring within minutes after the third IV infusion of anti-MSLN CAR-T cells in a patient with MPM, that was attributed to the formation of IgE antibodies against the murine- based scFv CAR portion (Schuberth et al. 2013).
Renal cell carcinoma
The only published clinical study of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), was a phase I/II trial conducted to assess the proof of concept and safety of using first generation CAR-T cells engineered to express a CAR for the TAA carboxy-anhydrase-IX (CAIX) for the treatment of CAIX + metastatic RCC (Beatty et al. 2014). Twelve patients were assigned in three cohorts and were treated with two cycles of multiple dose-escalating IV infusions of anti-CAIX CAR-T cells (2 × 107–2 × 109 cells/kg). Subcutaneous IL-2 was also administered as a means of enhancing CAR-T cell in vivo anti-tumor activity. Infused CAR-Ts were transiently detectable in the circulation, maintaining their antigen-specificity after post-treatment isolation. Although there were no clinical responses recorded, multiple recommendations for future trials have emerged from this study. First, patients developed antibodies and cellular immune responses against CAR-T cells, therefore highlighting the necessity to further examine the format and immunogenicity of CARs and specifically how the latter correlates with CAR-T cell persistence. Second, CAR-T cell infusions induced liver enzyme disturbances resulting in cessation of treatment in four out of eight patients. This was due to the development of on-target/ off-tumor toxicity as CAIX is expressed in the bile duct epithelium and CAR-T cells infiltrated around bile ducts.
Other clinical trials utilizing different potential target antigens including AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL), receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 (ROR2), EGFR and MSLN for RCC are currently ongoing. (NCT03393936, NCT03960060, NCT01869166, NCT03638206).
Breast cancer
C-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met) is a well-known molecule which is overexpressed in breast tissue and breast cancer tissue, irrespectively of the variety of breast cancer subtypes, displaying several physiological functions. Thus, it has emerged as an important breast cancer TAA target (Beatty et al. 2014; Lamers et al. 2016). Most importantly, regardless of hormone receptor/HER2 expression profile, c-Met overexpression in breast cancer tissue has been well established (Ho-Yen et al. 2015; Teachey et al. 2016). Nevertheless, c-Met does not constitute a breast cancer tissue- specific antigen, since it is expressed at low levels on healthy tissues. To limit on-target off-tumor toxicity and to assess safety and feasibility of intratumoral injections of c-Met transfected- CAR-T cells, a phase I clinical trial in 6 metastatic breast cancer patients was conducted (NCT01837602). The first cohort of patients received a single intratumoral injection of c-Met CAR-T cells, at a dose level of 3 X 107 cells, whereas the second cohort a higher dose of 3 X 108 cells. Post-injection AEs were present; however they were deemed irrelevant of the treatment action, and thus the treatment was considered well-tolerated. Clinical responses were not observed, albeit that immunohistochemistry analysis of tumor specimens revealed extensive tumor necrosis, macrophage infiltration and c-Met loss of immunoreactivity, all of which could be indicative of CAR-T cells selective targeting and capacity of eliciting an inflammatory response within TME (Teachey et al. 2016).
In another phase I clinical trial (NCT03060356), IV administration of mRNA-electroporated c-Met-specific CAR-T cells in metastatic breast cancer or r/r melanoma patients was assessed in terms of safety, feasibility and tolerability. It was terminated due to funding reasons. Concerning AEs, no CRS or grade 3 toxicities were observed, while most common AEs were of grade 1 or 2, namely anemia, fatigue, and malaise, revealing a good overall safety profile. Concerning clinical responses, the best achieved response was stable SD (4/7 patients), while 50% (2/4) of breast cancer patients experienced disease progression (Khoury et al. 2001).
In addition, a recent phase I/II clinical trial (NCT04430595) has been designed to investigate the safety and feasibility of HER2-, disialoganglioside (GD2)-, CD44v6- specific CAR-T cells (4SCAR T cells) in subjects with breast cancer, as well as one more recent phase 1 trial (NCT04020575) has emphasized on using mucin (MUC)- targeting CAR-T cells (huMNC2-CAR44 cells) in advanced MUC1+ breast cancer. Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma or breast cancer have been enrolled in a phase I clinical trial, which investigated the safety and tolerability of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)- specific CAR-T cells, in terms of treatment-related AEs and maximum tolerated dose (MTD).
Ovarian cancer
The first published clinical study of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with OC was a phase I clinical trial (NCT00019136) conducted to assess the safety of first-generation folate receptor alpha (FRα)-specific CAR-Τ cells (Tchou et al. 2017). In the first cohort, patients were treated with 3 treatment escalation dosages of FRα-specific CAR-T cells, in combination with high-dose IL-2. In the second cohort, patients were treated with 2 cycles of dual-specific CAR-T cells (reactive to both FRα and allogeneic cells) followed by subcutaneous immunization with allogeneic peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) per cycle. Regarding treatment- related toxicities, serious AEs were attributed to high-dose IL-2 administration. There was no reduction in tumor burden as shown by a number of observations. First, tracking radiolabeled FRα-specific CAR-T cells exhibited lack of specific localization to tumor site except in one patient with detectable accumulation of CAR-T cells in a peritoneal metastasis. Second, CAR-T cells were present in the circulation in large numbers for only 2 days after administration, quickly declining and being barely detectable after 1 month in the majority of patients treated. Third, an inhibitory factor against the CAR-Ts was progressively developed in the serum of three patients, drastically limiting anti-tumor responses.
In an already mentioned clinical trial (NCT03198546), 1 patient with recurrent, refractory OC was treated with anti-MSLN CAR-T cells engineered to secrete IL-17 and CCL19 (Zhan et al. 2019). A total of two intra-abdominal infusions were administered with neither infusion-related nor therapy-related serious AEs. No tumor remission was observed and by day 38 of therapy, staging evaluation showed disease progression.
Other ongoing clinical trials utilize different potential antigen targets for OC such as MUC1, NKG2D, HER-2 and CD276 (NCT04025216, NCT03018405, NCT04511871, NCT04670068) while in vitro studies show promising findings exploiting novel tumor-specific antigens, namely TAG72, MUC16 and 5T4 (Shah et al. 2020; Kershaw et al. 2006; Murad et al. 2018). Lastly, some of the ongoing clinical trials explore the prospect of direct peritoneal administration to overcome the challenge of poor tumor trafficking. (NCT03585764, NCT02498912).
Prostate cancer
Currently, all four clinical trials with published results for prostate cancer (PC) utilize prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as the target antigen. Remarkably, Narayan et al. developed the first-in-human clinical trial, in which PSMA-specific dominant-negative transforming growth factor β (TFG-β) receptor CAR-T cells were exploited (NCT03089203). Specifically, based on the ability of PC to secrete TGF-β for the inhibition of anti-tumor immunity, the investigators hypothesized that engineering anti-PSMA CAR-T cells insensitive to TGF-β (dominant negative TGF-β receptor) will enhance CAR-T cell ability to infiltrate, proliferate, and mediate antitumor responses in PC (Chekmasova et al. 2010). Moreover, Slovin et al. incorporated an iCasp9-based safety switch on their CAR construct (NCT04249947). In another recent clinical trial, the piggyBac transposon system was utilized to generate anti-PSMA CAR-T cells (Owens et al. 2018). This novel non- viral engineering system is believed to produce a high percentage of stem cell memory T cells, supporting in vivo CAR-T cells expansion and persistence (Narayan et al. 2022).
An IV dose- escalating, multiple injection pattern is the most commonly used dosage scheme, with a starting point ranging from 0.25 × 106 to 1 × 109, following a preconditioning lymphodepleting regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. In one clinical trial (BB-1ND12084) low- dose IL-2 was co- administered, to sustain infused CAR-T cell activation. Interestingly, Junghans et al., described an unexpected inverse correlation between IL-2 levels and CAR-T cell engraftment, with administered IL-2 being depleted up to 20-fold with high engraments (Slovin et al. 2022). Compared to clinical trials on other solid tumors, CAR-T cells expansion and persistence did not significantly differ, with CAR-T cell levels declining after 3–4 weeks.
Concerning clinical activity, in the majority of clinical trials, clinical responses in patients treated with PSMA- specific CAR- T cells were evaluated considering prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serologic changes. More specifically, in a clinical trial, two-of-five patients achieved PSA responses with PSA declines of 50% and 70% and PSA delays of 78 and 150 days respectively (Slovin et al. 2022). Notably, in an ongoing phase I trial (NCT03089203), three patients demonstrated a PSA reduction of ≥ 30% with CAR-T cell suppression following upregulation of inhibitory soluble molecules in the TME, therefore highlighting the need to explore superior multipronged strategies against the TME in future studies (Chekmasova et al. 2010). Additionaly, early results of a recent clinical trial (NCT04249947) have demonstrated promising results regarding CAR-T cell antitumor responses. First, PSA-specific antitumor activity was documented in a total of 7 patients, with PSA declines of > 50% (n = 3) and > 99% (n = 1) noted. Second, three-of-four patients who underwent pre- and post-treament fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PSMA-PET imaging, exhibited significant to complete reduction of abnormal uptake in metastatic sites. Third, post-treatment tumor biopsy performed in one patient revealed infiltration and elimination of tumor cells by anti-PSMA CAR-T cells (Owens et al. 2018).
Concerning AEs and toxicities, in the two older clinical trials (NCT01140373 (Arcangeli et al. 2020), BB-1ND12084) none of the patients experienced any CAR-T cell treatment-related high- grade AEs, while the most common AE was intermittent febrile episodes. Paradoxically, in the most recent clinical trials (NCT03089203, NCT04249947), severe AEs were present. More precisely, Narayan et al. described AEs, referencing patient cases of grade ≥ 2 CRS, including one case of > 98% PSA reduction, grade 4 CRS and death due to concurrent sepsis. Furthermore, it was also mentioned that acute elevations in inflammatory cytokines were directly associated with manageable high-grade CRS episodes (Chekmasova et al. 2010). Similarly, in the most recent clinical trial (NCT04249947) CRS was observed in 6 patients, with one of them developing macrophage activation syndrome/uveitis (only grade ≥ 3 CRS event) while CRS marker elevations were moderate. In the same trial, other common side effects were cytopenias, infections and constitutional symptoms most probably due to lymphodepletion, while manageable ocular manifestations were reported in 3 patients (Owens et al. 2018).
Glioblastoma
To date, interleukin 13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13Ra2) and HER2 are the most frequently tested TAAs in clinical trials with published results regarding CAR-T cell therapy in glioblastoma. Additionally, epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII) originates from a novel tumor-specific gene rearrangement that codes for a unique protein expressed in approximately 30% of gliomas and is a promising target for CAR-T cell therapy (Junghans et al. 2016). Therefore, to the best of our knowledge there are two clinical trials with posted results that utilize this target antigen (NCT02209376, NCT01454596). Regarding the exploited CAR generation technology, in the majority of clinical trials, second generation CARs are being utilized. Interestingly, in one clinical trial (NCT01454596) the CAR construct containing the CD- 28 and 4-1BB co-signaling elements (third-generation CAR) was chosen by the researchers, based on previous evidence from animal model studies that the presence of additional signaling domains is associated with a better survival of CAR-T cells (Slovin et al. 2013).
In most clinical trials, CAR-T cells’ route of administration is intracavitary/ intracranial, via a catheter/reservoir system, while most commonly, multiple injections of the respective CAR-T cell product are infused. Specifically, in “IL13 zetakine” clinical trial (NCT00730613), the first in human pilot study, assessing safety and feasibility of CAR-T cells targeting IL13Ra2, a total of 12 escalating intracavitary doses (three initial infusions of 1 × 107, 5 × 107, 1 × 108 cells/kg followed by 9 additional doses of 1 × 108 cells/kg) were administered in two patients. In a follow-up trial (NCT02208362), one patient, with recurrent multifocal leptomeningeal glioblastoma involving both cerebral hemispheres received 6 intracavitary CAR-T cell infusions (an initial infusion of 2 × 106 cells/kg followed by five infusions of 10 × 106 cells/kg) through a catheter device. Remarkably, due to new emerging lesions and disease progression 10 additional intraventricular CAR-T cell treatment cycles were delivered via a second catheter device placed in the right lateral ventricle. Additionally, in a recently initiated clinical trial (NCT03500991), HER2-specific CAR-T cells were administered intracavitary or intraventricularly with a multiple locoregional injections pattern of a weekly dose of CAR-T cells for three weeks,
followed by a week off, an examination period, and then another course of weekly doses for three weeks (Humphrey et al. 1990). Lastly, it is worth mentioning that in two specific clinical trials, CAR-T cells were administered intravenously, following again a dose- escalating pattern (NCT02209376, NCT01109095).
Regarding clinical and antitumor activity, promising results have emerged from several clinical trials. First, in “IL13 zetakine” clinical trial patients developed temporary therapy-related brain inflammation and persistent necrosis at the tumor site following each infusion of anti-IL13Ra2 CAR-T cells (detected by increased MRI Gd-enhancement and increased signal on fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images). Remarkably, brain inflammation appeared to correlate directly with IL13Rα2 antigen expression, since it was most prominent in the two patients with the highest IL13Rα2 levels. Additionally, histopathological analysis of tumor tissue from one patient before and after CAR-T cell administration indicated decreased IL13Ra2 expression within the tumor, further enhancing evidence of anti-tumor activity of anti-IL13Ra2 CAR-T cells (Morgan et al. 2012). Furthermore, in the follow-up clinical trial (NCT02208362), a patient who received a total of 16 CAR-T cell regional infusions, demonstrated dramatical decrease (77% to 100% reduction) in all tumor sites (both intracranial and spinal) and the patient progressively returned to normal life activities, sustaining this clinical response for about 7.5 months (Vitanza et al. 2021). In another clinical trial utilizing anti-EGFRvIII CAR-T cells (NCT02209376 (Brown et al. 2015)) one patient experienced SD for over 18 months of follow-up while seven out of ten patients underwent post-therapy surgical resection, thus allowing pathologic study findings, which showed detectable CAR-T cell trafficking to active glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) sites, as well as EGFRvIII reduced expression in five out of seven patients, all indicating clinical activity of the study therapy. However, in situ evaluation of TME demonstrated increased and robust expression of inhibitory molecules after CART-EGFRvIII infusion, therefore highlighting the importance of overcoming immunosuppressive changes in TME to enhance the efficacy of EGFRvIII- directed strategies in GBM. Lastly results from a phase I trial exploiting anti-HER2 CAR-T cells revealed partial response in 1 patient, SD in 7 patients for 8 weeks to 29 months and progressive disease in 8 patients (16 evaluable patients) with researchers highlighting that evaluation of anti-HER2 CAR-T cells in GBM patients in a phase 2b study is warranted (Brown et al. 2016).
Concerning overall safety, CAR-T cell therapy for GMB was well tolerated, while all routes of administration (intracavitary, intraventricular and IV) indicated a good safety profile with typically limited serious AEs. Few instances of clinically manageable neurologic events, mostly headaches and seizures were also present. (NCT00730613, NCT02209376, NCT01109095).
Recent progress
Very recently, presented at European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2022, four early-phase studies, with two of them being strictly CAR- T cell- based (O’Rourke et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2017), highlighted the clinical potential of immunotherapy, as a reasonable treatment option in advanced solid tumors. Different technologies, with convincing efficacy and mixed tolerability, were explored; two studies utilized CAR-T-cell therapies (O’Rourke et al. 2017; Ahmed et al. 2017), one utilized a vaccine-targeted approach (Mackensen, et al. 2022) and one utilized a TCR T-cell therapy (Fang, et al. 2022).
More specifically, the first-in-human phase I clinical trial (NCT04503278) in patients with claudin 6 (CLDN6)- positive r/r solid tumors was designed to investigate safety and tolerability of an innovative, hybrid therapeutic approach, comprising two components: CLDN6- specific CAR-T cells and CLDN6-encoding CAR-T cell-Amplifying RNA Vaccine (CARVac), designed to expand adoptively transferred CAR-T cells and improve their persistence (O’Rourke et al. 2017). Following lymphodepletion, the bifurcated (monotherapy and combination) 3 + 3 design comprises CLDN6- specific CAR-T cells dose escalations for monotherapy and CAR-T cells dose escalations combined with CLDN6 CARVac, applied repeatedly after CAR-T cells infusion with an intra-patient dose escalation (25 up to 50 μg). Treatment- related AEs were attributed to lymphodepletion or asymptomatic transaminase/ lipase elevations. In particular, the following adverse events were observed: pancytopenia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in the context of dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), as well as manageable CRS of grade 2 and 3. In terms of clinical response, out of 21 evaluable patients, 7 had PR, 6 had PD and most interestingly, 8 had SD, with 6 of them presenting with tumor shrinkage and 1 of them with post- 18 weeks negative PET-CT and negative serological tumour marker results.
Next, the first-in-human, open-label, multi-centers trial (NCT05028933) in patients with EpCAM- positive relapsed/ refractory gastrointestinal (GI) tumors was designed to examine the safety, efficacy and cytokinetic profile of IMC001, an EpCAM- specific CAR-T cell based immunotherapy. More precisely, patients were treated with a classic 3 + 3 design (0.3, 1 or 3 × 106 cells/kg) with either separate IMC001 escalated doses (monotherapy) or IMC001 escalated doses combined with radiofrequency or microwave ablation (Ahmed et al. 2017). Regarding AEs, although no DLTs were observed, all patients developed more than grade 3 haematological toxicities, one patient developed autoimmune hepatitis, while two other patients developed grade 1–2 CRS. Preliminary efficacy results showed that 4 out of 5 evaluable patients showed SD and 1 patient, receiving the lowest treatment dosage, showed PD. In conclusion, IMC001 shows a manageable safety profile and reasonable anti-tumor activities at the initial dosage level in patients with refractory EpCAM + cancers of the GI system.
A recent update on safety and efficacy data of SURPASS (NCT04044859), the phase I clinical trial of ADP-A2M4CD8 in patients with antigen melanoma- associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4)- positive unresectable or metastatic tumors, was presented at ESMO Congress 2022. ADP-A2M4CD8 is a next-generation, T-cell immunotherapy, based on the transduction of leukapheresis- obtained T-cells with a lentiviral vector carrying a T-cell receptor with enhanced affinity for a specific peptide and CD8α co-receptor genes. Currently updated data further support the favorable safety profile of ADP-A2M4CD8, while also providing encouraging evidence of clinical activity in patients with MAGE-A4- positive unresectable or metastatic tumors, especially gastroesophageal and ovarian tumors, for which also, two phase 2 trials are to be initiated (Fang et al. 2022).
Overcoming challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors
In this section we discuss the pivotal challenges associated with CAR-T cell therapy against solid tumors and the most prominent strategies that are currently developed to overcome them. Although detailed analysis of the obstacles in CAR-T cell therapy is beyond the scope of this review, the challenges listed below are the most significant barriers interfering with the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy and disturbing the desirable transition to everyday clinical practice (Table 2).
Choosing tumor-specific antigen
The diverse expression of TAAs in cancer cells is a major barrier to the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy against solid tumors. Unlike hematological malignancies where a TAA, such as CD19 in ALL, is uniformly expressed, most solid tumors do not express a single tumor specific antigen (Kyi et al. 2022). Additionally, variable and constantly changing levels of antigen expression in different tumor sites further affect CAR-T cell activity. Even worse, TAA are commonly found at low levels on normal tissues, resulting in cross reactions (i.e., “OFF target” and “ON target OFF tumor”) with regional non-tumor cells and severe damage to healthy tissues (Hong et al. 2022).
To date, various methods have been used to overcome these obstacles. Firstly, the most apparent way to tackle tumor TAA heterogeneity and strive for multispecificity is to administer different CAR-T cell products simultaneously or consecutively. It is also possible to combine vectors for two separate CARs during cell production to generate a hybrid product. Another strategy that is rapidly evolving focuses on engineering T-cells with the ability to co-express more than one CARs, namely bispecific or multivalent CARs (Sterner and Sterner 2021). So far there are 3 distinct classes of bispecific CARs that are exploited in T-cell engineering: Dual CAR, tandem CAR (tanCAR) and inhibitory CAR (iCAR). The concept of dual CARs was firstly introduced in 2013, with T-cells expressing both a CAR inducing a suboptimal activation upon recognizing one antigen and an additional chimeric costimulatory receptor specific for a second antigen (Hou et al. 2021). In contrast with dual-T cells that co- express two separate CARs, tanCARs consist of a single receptor that includes two different antigen recognition domains (Marofi et al. 2021). Lastly iCARs, express both a CAR construct and another one that is designed by attaching the signaling domains of T-cell inhibitory receptors to an antigen binder that recognizes a previously specified antigen expressed by healthy cells (Kloss et al. 2013; Hegde et al. 2016). In terms of multivalent CARs, a trivalent CAR-T cell approach has also been tested demonstrating potentiated anti-tumor activity and cytokine secretion over best monospecific and bispecific CAR-T cell designs (Fedorov et al. 2013). Recently, an advanced TRUCKS-Synthetic Notch (synNotch system further upgraded the multivalent approach. SynNotch receptors are a new class of receptors that can induce customized transcriptional circuits in response to recognition of user-specified antigens, connecting antigen sensing to various custom-acquired effector activities (Hashem Boroojerdi et al. 2020). Another strategy to overcome TAA-related is the use of nanobody-based antigen recognition domain instead of an scFv one. Nanobodies in CAR structures are superior to conventional scFv targeting regions, and were additionally used to target specific markers that are overexpressed in TME (Bielamowicz et al. 2018; Roybal et al. 2016; Mo et al. 2021). Lastly a final approach to overcome TAA heterogeneity is to target cancer stem cells, which are one of the reasons for the relapse, metastasis, and broad heterogeneity of tumor cells (Bakhtiari et al. 2009).
CAR-T cell trafficking and tumor penetration
The complex nature of solid tumors, consisting of numerous tight connections with tumor-surrounding cells, abundant presence of blood vessels, fibroblasts and extracellular matrix proteins, various signaling molecules and decreased levels of oxygen/nutrients, in combination with the surrounding tissues and dense fibrotic matrix in tumor site conform a strong barrier that renders CAR-T cell delivery to tumor site extremely challenging (Xie et al. 2019; Pattabiraman and Weinberg 2014). Additionally, in contrast to hematological malignancies, in which both CAR-T and cancer cells, which share hematopoietic origins, have a higher tendency to migrate to similar locations such as bone morrow or lymph nodes, most solid tumors do not attract CAR-T cells (Pattabiraman and Weinberg 2014; Salmon et al. 2012). That is mainly due to the mismatching of endogenous T-cell chemokine receptors with the chemokines that are secreted from tumor cells. Other crucial elements associated with poor CAR-T cell trafficking and infiltration in solid tumors, are the abnormal secretion of vascular-related factors such as intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) as well as the presence of other immune cells in tumor tissue. For the latter, recent studies have demonstrated the significance of tissue-resident memory T cells which express a distinctive pattern of adhesion/costimulatory molecules and residency markers (Newick et al. 2016).
The most frequently explored way to potentiate CAR-T cell trafficking and tumor penetration is the administration of CAR-T cells locally in the tumor site. Intracranial and/or intracavitary delivery routes have been assessed exhibiting low toxicity profiles and favorable antitumor activity in patients with glioblastoma (Vitanza et al. 2021; Friedl and Alexander 2011). Similarly, intra-pleural and intra-hepatic artery administrations have been explored in MPM and pancreatibilliary/CRC respectively (Zhan et al. 2019; Hege et al. 2017; Carpenito et al. 2009). It is also possible to exploit implantable biopolymer devices that deliver CAR-T cells directly to the surfaces of solid tumors, thereby exposing them to high concentrations of immune cells for a substantial period of time (Vedvyas et al. 2019). Other engineering approaches are focusing on utilizing chemokines that are excessively secreted by tumor cells by modifying CAR-T cells to express receptors reactive to these chemokines (i.e., C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 8 (CXCR8) in melanoma, C–C motif chemokine receptor (CCR) 2b in neuroblastoma and MPM) (Tang et al. 2021; Smith et al. 2017; Peng et al. 2010). Rather than inducing transgenic expression of chemokine receptors on CAR-T cells, an alternative strategy is to force cancer cells to secrete chemokines in which T-cells are reactive to. Specifically, an oncolytic adenovirus has been exploited to convey chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) chemokine to the tumor cells. Endogenous T-cells and therefore CAR-T cells typically express RANTES (Regulated upon Activation, Normal T Cell Expressed and Presumably Secreted) receptors (CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5) and the combination of CAR-T cells with the local delivery of CCL5-expressing oncolytic virus has improved persistence of CAR-T cells at tumor sites in preclinical models (Craddock et al. 2010; Kalmpatsa et al. 2020). Beyond addressing the effects of chemokine expression, strategies targeting tumor stroma, dense fibrotic matrix and abnormal vasculature have been examined in preclinical models, utilizing heparinase-secreting CAR-T cells, FAP- specific CAR-T cells and co-administration of anti-VEGF antibodies respectively (Ghosn et al. 2022; Nishio et al. 2014; Guo and Cui 2020).
Tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment
The immunosuppressive TME is another remarkable hurdle responsible for poor CAR-T cell antitumor activity against solid tumors. A variety of cell types that promote immunosuppression are present in the tumor milieu, including Tregs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and tumor-associated macrophages (Caruana et al. 2015). These cells along with tumor cells can also drive tumor growth and proliferation by secreting tumor facilitating cytokines, growth factors and chemokines including but not limited to IL-4, IL-10 and TGF-β (Chinnasamy et al. 2010). Furthermore, immune checkpoint molecules such as PD-1 or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and other co-inhibitory pathways can contribute to weak responses to CAR-T cell therapy and promote T cell exhaustion (Quail and Joyce 2013; Binnewies et al. 2018). Lastly, TME is frequently characterized by increased levels of adenosine and reactive oxygen species that are toxic to T cells reducing antitumor responses (Hosseinkhani et al. 2020; Yin et al. 2018).
To date, a number of strategies have been utilized to address the immunosuppressive TME and therefore enhance CAR-T cell therapy effectiveness. The most prominent is the use of combination immunotherapy with CAR-T cells and immune checkpoint inhibitors which target t PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 inhibitory pathways (Hoskin et al. 2008). CAR-T cells provide the necessary tumor-targeting infiltrate and a highly specific antitumor response while checkpoint blockade therapy can reactivate exhausted immune responses ensuring sustained T cell persistence and function (Hildeman et al. 2003). In solid tumors, this combination therapy is already exploited in several clinical trials (Liu et al. 2020; Carpenito et al. 2009). In the same context, PD-1 deficient CAR-T cells (PDCD1 gene knockout) have been generated via CRISPR demonstrating enhanced CAR-T cell antitumor activity in vitro and increased clearance of PD-L1 + tumor xenografts in vivo (Simon et al. 2018). While combination immune checkpoint inhibitors-CAR-T cell therapy will most likely be a new immunotherapy option soon, combining other forms of immunotherapy strategies may still be necessary to fully combat the complex TME (Grosser et al. 2019). Apart from PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4 signaling disruption, many other strategies are currently being tested, tackling different aspects of the hostile TME. In animal models, the depletion of Tregs and/or MDSCs via neutralizing antibodies and genetic modification has augmented CAR-T cell activity (Sterner and Sterner 2021; Rupp et al. 2017). Other engineering approaches have focused on generating CAR-T cells that are resistant to immunosuppression from TGF-β mediated inhibitory signals, through the expression of dominant negative TGF-beta type II receptor (Burga et al. 2015; Zhou et al. 2010) Another appealing strategy involves CAR-T cell manipulation to secrete stimulatory pro- inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12, IL-15 that can modify the TME and potentiate CAR-T cell antitumor responses (Foster et al. 2008; Kloss et al. 2018). Similarly, the already discussed novel TRUCKS-synNotch system can promote the expression of inflammatory cytokines, various antibodies and adjuvants in response to target antigens (Hashem Boroojerdi et al. 2020).
Conclusion
CAR-T cell therapy has become a promising and effective therapeutic option in patients with hematological malignancies. However, the transition of this technology to solid tumors encounters several challenging biological roadblocks mainly regarding tumor antigen heterogeneity, poor trafficking to tumor site, and hostility of the immunosuppressive TME. Despite an unprecedented number of CAR-T cell clinical trials in solid tumors currently ongoing, all of them are at early stages, and only a limited amount of clinical data has emerged. Therefore, it is of vital importance that more carefully designed clinical trials and multi-center collaborations are performed, and that preclinical research will continue to tackle emerging obstacles via developing elegant solutions and countermeasures, for CAR- T cell therapy to realize its potential as a curative therapeutic approach for solid tumors.
Data Availability
Data are included in the manuscript.
References
Abramson JS, Palomba ML, Gordon LI, Lunning MA, Wang M, Arnason J, Siddiqi T (2020) Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): a multicentre seamless design study. The Lancet 396(10254):839–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31366-0
Adachi K, Kano Y, Nagai T, Okuyama N, Sakoda Y, Tamada K (2018) IL-7 and CCL19 expression in CAR-T cells improves immune cell infiltration and CAR-T cell survival in the tumor. Nat Biotechnol 36(4):346–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4086
Adusumilli PS, Zauderer MG, Rusch VW, O’Cearbhaill R, Zhu A, Ngai D, Sadelain M (2019) Regional delivery of mesothelin-targeted CAR T cells for pleural cancers: Safety and preliminary efficacy in combination with anti-PD-1 agent. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.2511
Aghajanian H, Rurik JG, Epstein JA (2022) CAR-based therapies: opportunities for immuno-medicine beyond cancer. Nat Metab 4(2):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00537-5
Ahmed N, Brawley V, Hegde M, Bielamowicz K, Kalra M, Landi D, Gottschalk S (2017) HER2-Specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified virus-specific T cells for progressive glioblastoma. JAMA Oncol 3(8):1094. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0184
Arcangeli S, Falcone L, Camisa B, de Girardi F, Biondi M, Giglio F, Casucci M (2020) Next-generation manufacturing protocols enriching TSCM CAR T cells can overcome disease-specific t cell defects in cancer patients. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01217
Bakhtiari SHA, Rahbarizadeh F, Hasannia S, Ahmadvand D, Iri-Sofla FJ, Rasaee MJ (2009) Anti-MUC1 nanobody can redirect T-body cytotoxic effector function. Hybridoma 28(2):85–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/hyb.2008.0079
Beatty GL, Haas AR, Maus MV, Torigian DA, Soulen MC, Plesa G, June CH (2014) Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor mRNA-Engineered T cells induce antitumor activity in solid malignancies. Cancer Immunol Res 2(2):112–120. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0170
Beatty GL, O’Hara MH, Lacey SF, Torigian DA, Nazimuddin F, Chen F, June CH (2018) Activity of Mesothelin-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells against pancreatic carcinoma metastases in a phase 1 trial. Gastroenterology 155(1):29–32. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.029
Becerra CR, Manji GA, Kim DW, Gardner O, Malankar A, Shaw J, Woodard P (2019a) Ligand-inducible, prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)-directed GoCAR-T cells in advanced solid tumors: Preliminary results with cyclophosphamide (Cy) ± fludarabine (Flu) lymphodepletion (LD). J Clin Oncol 37(15):2536–2536
Becerra CR, Hoof P, Paulson AS, Manji GA, Gardner O, Malankar A, Woodard P (2019b) Ligand-inducible, prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA)-directed GoCAR-T cells in advanced solid tumors: Preliminary results from a dose escalation. J Clin Oncol 37(4):283–283
Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, Jakubowiak A, Agha M, Cohen AD, Jagannath S (2021) Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B- cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): a phase 1b/2 open-label study. The Lancet 398(10297):314–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00933-8
Bielamowicz K, Fousek K, Byrd TT, Samaha H, Mukherjee M, Aware N, Ahmed N (2018) Trivalent CAR T cells overcome interpatient antigenic variability in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 20(4):506–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox182
Binnewies M, Roberts EW, Kersten K, Chan V, Fearon DF, Merad M, Krummel MF (2018) Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy. Nat Med 24(5):541–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0014-x
Brentjens RJ, Santos E, Nikhamin Y, Yeh R, Matsushita M, la Perle K, Sadelain M (2007) Genetically Targeted T cells eradicate systemic acute lymphoblastic leukemia xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 13(18):5426–5435. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0674
Brentjens RJ, Davila ML, Riviere I, Park J, Wang X, Cowell LG, Sadelain M (2013) CD19-Targeted T cells rapidly induce molecular remissions in adults with chemotherapy-refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Trans Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3005930
Brocker T, Karjalainen K (1995) Signals through T cell receptor-zeta chain alone are insufficient to prime resting T lymphocytes. J Experiment Med. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.5.1653
Brocker et al (1995) T Brocker, K Karjalainen (1995) Signals through T cell receptor-zeta chain alone are insufficient to prime resting T lymphocytes. J Exp Med 181(5):1653–1659. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.5.1653
Brown CE, Badie B, Barish ME, Weng L, Ostberg JR, Chang W-C, Jensen MC (2015) Bioactivity and safety of IL13Rα2- redirected chimeric antigen receptor CD8+ T cells in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 21(18):4062–4072. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0428
Brown CE, Alizadeh D, Starr R, Weng L, Wagner JR, Naranjo A, Badie B (2016) Regression of glioblastoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. N Engl J Med 375(26):2561–2569. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1610497
Burga RA, Thorn M, Point GR, Guha P, Nguyen CT, Licata LA, Katz SC (2015) Liver myeloid-derived suppressor cells expand in response to liver metastases in mice and inhibit the anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CEA CAR-T. Cancer Immunol Immunother 64(7):817–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-015-1692-6
Carpenito C, Milone MC, Hassan R, Simonet JC, Lakhal M, Suhoski MM, June CH (2009) Control of large, established tumor xenografts with genetically retargeted human T cells containing CD28 and CD137 domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106(9):3360–3365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813101106
Caruana I, Savoldo B, Hoyos V, Weber G, Liu H, Kim ES, Dotti G (2015) Heparanase promotes tumor infiltration and antitumor activity of CAR-redirected T lymphocytes. Nat Med 21(5):524–529. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3833
Chekmasova AA, Rao TD, Nikhamin Y, Park KJ, Levine DA, Spriggs DR, Brentjens RJ (2010) Successful eradication of established peritoneal ovarian tumors in SCID-beige mice following adoptive transfer of T cells genetically targeted to the MUC16 antigen. Clin Cancer Res 16(14):3594–3606. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0192
Chinnasamy D, Yu Z, Theoret MR, Zhao Y, Shrimali RK, Morgan RA, Rosenberg SA (2010) Gene therapy using genetically modified lymphocytes targeting VEGFR-2 inhibits the growth of vascularized syngenic tumors in mice. J Clin Investig 120(11):3953–3968. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI43490
Chmielewski M, Abken H (2012) CAR T cells transform to trucks: chimeric antigen receptor–redirected T cells engineered to deliver inducible IL-12 modulate the tumour stroma to combat cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 61(8):1269–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1202-z
Chmielewski M, Abken H (2015) TRUCKs: the fourth generation of CARs. Expert Opin Biol Ther 15(8):1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.1046430
Chung H, Jung H, Noh J-Y (2021) Emerging approaches for solid tumor treatment using CAR-T cell therapy. Int J Mol Sci 22(22):12126. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212126
Craddock JA, Lu A, Bear A, Pule M, Brenner MK, Rooney CM, Foster AE (2010) Enhanced tumor trafficking of gd2 chimeric antigen receptor t cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. J Immunother 33(8):780–788. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181ee6675
Curtsinger JM, Lins DC, Mescher MF (2003) Signal 3 Determines tolerance versus full activation of naive CD8 T cells. J Exp Med 197(9):1141–1151. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20021910
Dai H, Tong C, Shi D, Chen M, Guo Y, Chen D, Shen P (2020) Efficacy and biomarker analysis of CD133-directed CAR T cells in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. OncoImmunology. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2020.1846926
Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K, Brentjens R (2014) Efficacy and toxicity management of 19–28z car t cell therapy in b cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3008226
Deng X, Gao F, Li N, Li Q, Zhou Y, Yang T, Cai J (2019) Antitumor activity of NKG2D CAR-T cells against human colorectal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Am J Cancer Res 9(5):945–958
Dotti G, Savoldo B, Brenner M (2009) Fifteen years of gene therapy based on chimeric antigen receptors: “are we nearly there yet?” Hum Gene Ther 20(11):1229–1239. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2009.142
Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G, Schindler DG (1993) Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(2):720–724. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.2.720
Fang W et al (2022) EpCAM-targeted CAR-T cell therapy in patients with advanced colorectal and gastric cancers. Ann Oncol 33:S880–S881
Fedorov VD, Themeli M, Sadelain M (2013) PD-1– and CTLA-4–Based inhibitory chimeric antigen receptors (icars) divert off- target immunotherapy responses. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3006597
Feng K, Guo Y, Liu Y, Dai H, Wang Y, Lv H, Han W (2017) Cocktail treatment with EGFR-specific and CD133-specific chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in a patient with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol 10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0378-7
Feng K, Liu Y, Guo Y, Qiu J, Wu Z, Dai H, Han W (2018) Phase I study of chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells in treating HER2-positive advanced biliary tract cancers and pancreatic cancers. Protein Cell 9(10):838–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-017-0440-4
Fesnak AD, June CH, Levine BL (2016) Engineered T cells: the promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 16(9):566–581. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.97
Foster AE, Dotti G, Lu A, Khalil M, Brenner MK, Heslop HE, Bollard CM (2008) Antitumor activity of EBV-specific T lymphocytes transduced with a dominant negative TGF-β receptor. J Immunother 31(5):500–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0b013e318177092b
Friedl P, Alexander S (2011) Cancer invasion and the microenvironment: plasticity and reciprocity. Cell 147(5):992–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.016
Ghosn M, Cheema W, Zhu A, Livschitz J, Maybody M, Boas FE, Solomon SB (2022) Image-guided interventional radiological delivery of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for pleural malignancies in a phase I/II clinical trial. Lung Cancer 165:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.01.003
Grosser R, Cherkassky L, Chintala N, Adusumilli PS (2019) Combination immunotherapy with CAR T cells and checkpoint blockade for the treatment of solid tumors. Cancer Cell 36(5):471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.006
Grupp SA, Kalos M, Barrett D, Aplenc R, Porter DL, Rheingold SR, June CH (2013) Chimeric antigen receptor-modified t cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med 368(16):1509–1518. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215134
Guo F, Cui J (2020) CAR-T in solid tumors: Blazing a new trail through the brambles. Life Sci 260:118300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118300
Haas AR, Tanyi JL, O’Hara MH, Gladney WL, Lacey SF, Torigian DA, Beatty GL (2019) Phase I study of lentiviral- transduced chimeric antigen receptor-modified t cells recognizing mesothelin in advanced solid cancers. Mol Ther 27(11):1919–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.07.015
Hanahan D (2022) Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov 12(1):31–46. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059
Hashem Boroojerdi M, Rahbarizadeh F, Safarzadeh Kozani P, Kamali E, Safarzadeh Kozani P (2020) Strategies for having a more effective and less toxic CAR T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Oncol 37(11):100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-020-01416-3
Haslauer T, Greil R, Zaborsky N, Geisberger R (2021) CAR T-Cell therapy in hematological malignancies. Int J Mol Sci 22(16):8996. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168996
Hegde M, Mukherjee M, Grada Z, Pignata A, Landi D, Navai SA, Ahmed N (2016) Tandem CAR T cells targeting HER2 and IL13Rα2 mitigate tumor antigen escape. J Clin Investig 126(8):3036–3052. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI83416
Hege KM, Bergsland EK, Fisher GA, Nemunaitis JJ, Warren RS, McArthur JG, Sherwin SA (2017) Safety, tumor trafficking and immunogenicity of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells specific for TAG-72 in colorectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 5(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-017-0222-9
Hildeman DA, Mitchell T, Kappler J, Marrack P (2003) T cell apoptosis and reactive oxygen species. J Clin Investig 111(5):575–581. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18007
Hombach AA, Heiders J, Foppe M, Chmielewski M, Abken H (2012) OX40 costimulation by a chimeric antigen receptor abrogates CD28 and IL-2 induced IL-10 secretion by redirected CD4 + T cells. OncoImmunology 1(4):458–466. https://doi.org/10.4161/onci.19855
Hong DS et al (2022) Updated safety and efficacy from SURPASS, the phase 1 trial of ADP-A2M4CD8, a next-generation autologous T-cell receptor T-cell therapy, in previously treated patients with unresectable or metastatic tumors. Ann Oncol 33:S879–S880
Hoskin DW, Mader JS, Furlong SJ, Conrad DM, Blay J (2008) Inhibition of T cell and natural killer cell function by adenosine and its contribution to immune evasion by tumor cells (Review). Int J Oncol 32(3):527–535
Hosseinkhani N, Derakhshani A, Kooshkaki O, Abdoli Shadbad M, Hajiasgharzadeh K, Baghbanzadeh A, Baradaran B (2020) Immune Checkpoints and CAR-T Cells: The Pioneers in Future Cancer Therapies? Int J Mol Sci 21(21):8305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21218305
Hou AJ, Chen LC, Chen YY (2021) Navigating CAR-T cells through the solid-tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 20(7):531–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00189-2
Ho-Yen CM, Jones JL, Kermorgant S (2015) The clinical and functional significance of c-Met in breast cancer: a review. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-015-0547-6
Hsieh C-S, Macatonia SE, Tripp CS, Wolf SF, O’Garra A, Murphy KM (1993) Development of T H 1 CD4 + T Cells Through IL-12 Produced by Listeria -Induced Macrophages. Science 260(5107):547–549. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8097338
Huang R, Li X, He Y, Zhu W, Gao L, Liu Y, Zhang X (2020) Recent advances in CAR-T cell engineering. J Hematol Oncol 13(1):86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-020-00910-5
Humphrey PA, Wong AJ, Vogelstein B, Zalutsky MR, Fuller GN, Archer GE, Bigner DD (1990) Anti-synthetic peptide antibody reacting at the fusion junction of deletion-mutant epidermal growth factor receptors in human glioblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87(11):4207–4211. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.11.4207
Hung K, Hayashi R, Lafond-Walker A, Lowenstein C, Pardoll D, Levitsky H (1998) The central role of CD4+ T cells in the antitumor immune response. J Exp Med 188(12):2357–2368. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.188.12.2357
June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC (2018) CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6711
Junghans RP, Ma Q, Rathore R, Gomes EM, Bais AJ, Lo ASY, Cohen SI (2016) Phase I trial of anti-PSMA designer CAR-T cells in prostate cancer: possible role for interacting interleukin 2-T cell pharmacodynamics as a determinant of clinical response. Prostate 76(14):1257–1270. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23214
Kaliński P, Hilkens CMU, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML (1999) T-cell priming by type-1and type-2 polarized dendritic cells: the concept of a third signal. Immunol Today 20(12):561–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01547-9
Katz SC, Burga RA, McCormack E, Wang LJ, Mooring W, Point GR, Junghans RP (2015) Phase I hepatic immunotherapy for metastases study of intra-arterial chimeric antigen receptor-modified t-cell therapy for CEA+ liver metastases. Clin Cancer Res 21(14):3149–3159. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1421
Katz SC, Moody AE, Guha P, Hardaway JC, Prince E, LaPorte J, Junghans RP (2020a) HITM-SURE: Hepatic immunotherapy for metastases phase Ib anti-CEA CAR-T study utilizing pressure enabled drug delivery. J Immunother Cancer 8(2):e001097. https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-001097
Katz SC, Hardaway J, Prince E, Guha P, Cunetta M, Moody A, Junghans RP (2020b) HITM-SIR: phase Ib trial of intraarterial chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and selective internal radiation therapy for CEA+ liver metastases. Cancer Gene Ther 27(5):341–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-019-0104-z
Kershaw MH, Westwood JA, Parker LL, Wang G, Eshhar Z, Mavroukakis SA, Hwu P (2006) A Phase I study on adoptive immunotherapy using gene-modified T cells for ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(20):6106–6115. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1183
Khoury H, Dankort DL, Sadekova S, Naujokas MA, Muller WJ, Park M (2001) Distinct tyrosine autophosphorylation sites mediate induction of epithelial mesenchymal like transition by an activated ErbB-2/Neu receptor. Oncogene 20(7):788–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204166
Klampatsa A, Akbelda SM (2020) Current advances in CAR T cell therapy for malignant mesothelioma. J Cell Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3396/immunology.2.042
Kloss CC, Condomines M, Cartellieri M, Bachmann M, Sadelain M (2013) Combinatorial antigen recognition with balanced signaling promotes selective tumor eradication by engineered T cells. Nat Biotechnol 31(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2459
Kloss CC, Lee J, Zhang A, Chen F, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, June CH (2018) Dominant-negative TGF-β receptor enhances PSMA-targeted human CAR T cell proliferation and augments prostate cancer eradication. Mol Ther 26(7):1855–1866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.003
Koehler H, Kofler D, Hombach A, Abken H (2007) CD28 Costimulation overcomes transforming growth factor-β–mediated repression of proliferation of redirected human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in an antitumor cell attack. Can Res 67(5):2265–2273. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2098
Kofler DM, Chmielewski M, Rappl G, Hombach A, Riet T, Schmidt A, Abken H (2011) CD28 costimulation impairs the efficacy of a redirected t-cell antitumor attack in the presence of regulatory T cells which can be overcome by preventing lck activation. Mol Ther 19(4):760–767. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2011.9
Koneru M, Purdon TJ, Spriggs D, Koneru S, Brentjens RJ (2015) IL-12 secreting tumor-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells eradicate ovarian tumors in vivo. OncoImmunology 4(3):e994446. https://doi.org/10.4161/2162402X.2014.994446
Kowolik CM, Topp MS, Gonzalez S, Pfeiffer T, Olivares S, Gonzalez N, Cooper LJN (2006) CD28 costimulation provided through a CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor enhances In vivo persistence and antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred T cells. Can Res 66(22):10995–11004. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0160
Krenciute G, Prinzing BL, Yi Z, Wu M-F, Liu H, Dotti G, Gottschalk S (2017) Transgenic expression of IL15 improves antiglioma activity of IL13Rα2-CAR T cells but results in antigen loss variants. Cancer Immunol Res 5(7):571–581. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0376
Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos M-V, Anderson KC (2017) Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3(1):17046. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.46
Kuwana Y, Asakura Y, Utsunomiya N, Nakanishi M, Arata Y, Itoh S, Kurosawa Y (1987) Expression of chimeric receptor composed of immunoglobulin-derived V resions and T-cell receptor-derived C regions. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 149(3):960–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(87)90502-X
Kyi CK et al (2022) Personalized, off-the-shelf KRAS neoantigen-specific immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced solid tumors: clinical benefit associated with decreases in ctDNA (SLATE-KRAS). Ann Oncol 33:S880
Lamers CHJ, Klaver Y, Gratama JW, Sleijfer S, Debets R (2016) Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with CAIX CAR-engineered T-cells–a completed study overview. Biochem Soc Trans 44(3):951–959. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20160037
Larson RC, Maus MV (2021) Recent advances and discoveries in the mechanisms and functions of CAR T cells. Nat Rev Cancer 21(3):145–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-020-00323-z
Liu Y, Guo Y, Wu Z, Feng K, Tong C, Wang Y, Han W (2020) Anti-EGFR chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: A Phase I clinical trial. Cytotherapy 22(10):573–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.04.088
Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, Miklos DB, Lekakis LJ, Oluwole OO, Neelapu SS (2019) Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30864-7
Mackensen A et al. BNT211–01: A Phase 1 trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of CLDN6 CAR T cells and CLDN6-encoding mRNA vaccine-mediated in vivo expansion in patients with CLDN6-positive advanced solid tumours
Magee MS, Abraham TS, Baybutt TR, Flickinger JC, Ridge NA, Marszalowicz GP, Snook AE (2018) Human GUCY2C- targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-expressing T cells eliminate colorectal cancer metastases. Cancer Immunol Res 6(5):509–516. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0362
Maher J, Brentjens RJ, Gunset G, Rivière I, Sadelain M (2002) Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric TCRζ /CD28 receptor. Nat Biotechnol 20(1):70–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0102-70
Marofi F, Motavalli R, Safonov VA, Thangavelu L, Yumashev AV, Alexander M, Khiavi FM (2021) CAR T cells in solid tumors: challenges and opportunities. Stem Cell Res Ther 12(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-020-02128-1
Milone MC, Fish JD, Carpenito C, Carroll RG, Binder GK, Teachey D, June CH (2009) Chimeric receptors containing CD137 signal transduction domains mediate enhanced survival of T cells and increased antileukemic efficacy in vivo. Mol Ther 17(8):1453–1464. https://doi.org/10.1038/mt.2009.83
Mo F, Duan S, Jiang X, Yang X, Hou X, Shi W, Lu X (2021) Nanobody-based chimeric antigen receptor T cells designed by CRISPR/Cas9 technology for solid tumor immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00462-1
Morgan RA, Johnson LA, Davis JL, Zheng Z, Woolard KD, Reap EA, Rosenberg SA (2012) Recognition of glioma stem cells by genetically modified T cells targeting EGFRvIII and development of adoptive cell therapy for glioma. Hum Gene Ther 23(10):1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2012.041
Munshi NC, Anderson LD, Shah N, Madduri D, Berdeja J, Lonial S, San-Miguel J (2021) Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 384(8):705–716. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2024850
Murad JP, Kozlowska AK, Lee HJ, Ramamurthy M, Chang W-C, Yazaki P, Priceman SJ (2018) Effective targeting of TAG72+ peritoneal ovarian tumors via regional delivery of CAR-engineered T cells. Front Immunol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02268
Narayan V, Barber-Rotenberg JS, Jung I-Y, Lacey SF, Rech AJ, Davis MM, Haas NB (2022) PSMA-targeting TGFβ- insensitive armored CAR T cells in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase 1 trial. Nat Med 28(4):724–734. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01726-1
Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, Lekakis LJ, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, Go WY (2017) Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med 377(26):2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707447
Newick K, Moon E, Albelda SM (2016) Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for solid tumors. Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 3:16006. https://doi.org/10.1038/mto.2016.6
Nishio N, Diaconu I, Liu H, Cerullo V, Caruana I, Hoyos V, Dotti G (2014) Armed oncolytic virus enhances immune functions of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in solid tumors. Can Res 74(18):5195–5205. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0697
O’Rourke DM, Nasrallah MP, Desai A, Melenhorst JJ, Mansfield K, Morrissette JJD, Maus MV (2017) A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0984
Owens GL, Sheard VE, Kalaitsidou M, Blount D, Lad Y, Cheadle EJ, Harrop R (2018) Preclinical assessment of CAR T-cell therapy targeting the tumor antigen 5T4 in ovarian cancer. J Immunother 41(3):130–140. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000203
Pang N, Shi J, Qin L, Chen A, Tang Y, Yang H, Zhang Z (2021) IL-7 and CCL19-secreting CAR-T cell therapy for tumors with positive glypican-3 or mesothelin. J Hematol Oncol 14(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01128-9
Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA (2014) Tackling the cancer stem cells—what challenges do they pose? Nat Rev Drug Discovery 13(7):497–512. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd4253
Peng W, Ye Y, Rabinovich BA, Liu C, Lou Y, Zhang M, Hwu P (2010) Transduction of tumor-specific T cells with CXCR2 chemokine receptor improves migration to tumor and antitumor immune responses. Clin Cancer Res 16(22):5458–5468. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0712
Petrausch U, Schuberth PC, Hagedorn C, Soltermann A, Tomaszek S, Stahel R, Renner C (2012) Re-directed T cells for the treatment of fibroblast activation protein (FAP)-positive malignant pleural mesothelioma (FAPME-1). BMC Cancer 12(1):615. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-615
Quail DF, Joyce JA (2013) Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19(11):1423–1437. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3394
Roybal KT, Williams JZ, Morsut L, Rupp LJ, Kolinko I, Choe JH, Lim WA (2016) Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors. Cell 167(2):419-432.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011
Rupp LJ, Schumann K, Roybal KT, Gate RE, Ye CJ, Lim WA, Marson A (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Sci Rep 7(1):737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00462-8
Salmon H, Franciszkiewicz K, Damotte D, Dieu-Nosjean M-C, Validire P, Trautmann A, Donnadieu E (2012) Matrix architecture defines the preferential localization and migration of T cells into the stroma of human lung tumors. J Clin Investig 122(3):899–910. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI45817
Savoldo B, Ramos CA, Liu E, Mims MP, Keating MJ, Carrum G, Dotti G (2011) CD28 costimulation improves expansion and persistence of chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in lymphoma patients. J Clin Investig 121(5):1822–1826. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI46110
Schuberth PC, Hagedorn C, Jensen SM, Gulati P, van den Broek M, Mischo A, Petrausch U (2013) Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma by fibroblast activation protein-specific re-directed T cells. J Transl Med 11(1):187. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-187
Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, Waller EK, Borchmann P, McGuirk JP, Maziarz RT (2019) Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med 380(1):45–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804980
June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC (2018) CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 359(6382):1361–1365. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6711
Shah PD, Huang ACC, Xu X, Zhang PJ, Orlowski R, Matlawski T, Mitchell TC (2020) Phase I trial of autologous cMET- directed CAR-t cells administered intravenously in patients with melanoma & breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.10035
Simon B, Harrer DC, Schuler-Thurner B, Schaft N, Schuler G, Dörrie J, Uslu U (2018) The siRNA-mediated downregulation of PD-1 alone or simultaneously with CTLA-4 shows enhanced in vitro CAR-T-cell functionality for further clinical development towards the potential use in immunotherapy of melanoma. Exp Dermatol 27(7):769–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13678
Slovin SF, Wang X, Hullings M, Arauz G, Bartido S, Lewis JS, Riviere I (2013) Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR + ) modified T cells targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in patients (pts) with castrate metastatic prostate cancer (CMPC). J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.72
Slovin SF, Dorff TB, Falchook GS, Wei XX, Gao X, McKay RR, Ostertag EM (2022) Phase 1 study of P-PSMA-101 CAR-T cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.098
Smith TT, Moffett HF, Stephan SB, Opel CF, Dumigan AG, Jiang X, Stephan MT (2017) Biopolymers codelivering engineered T cells and STING agonists can eliminate heterogeneous tumors. J Clin Investig 127(6):2176–2191. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI87624
Sterner RC, Sterner RM (2021) CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J 11(4):69. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7
Sureban SM, Berahovich R, Zhou H, Xu S, Wu L, Ding K, Houchen CW (2019) DCLK1 monoclonal antibody-based CAR-T cells as a novel treatment strategy against human colorectal cancers. Cancers 12(1):54. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010054
Tang X, Wang Y, Huang J, Zhang Z, Liu F, Xu J, Zhou L (2021) Administration of B7–H3 targeted chimeric antigen receptor-T cells induce regression of glioblastoma. Signal Transduct Target Ther 6(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-021-00505-7
Tchou J, Zhao Y, Levine BL, Zhang PJ, Davis MM, Melenhorst JJ, June CH (2017) Safety and efficacy of intratumoral injections of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 5(12):1152–1161. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0189
Teachey DT, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Melenhorst JJ, Maude SL, Frey N, Grupp SA (2016) Identification of predictive biomarkers for cytokine release syndrome after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Discov 6(6):664–679. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0040
Thistlethwaite FC, Gilham DE, Guest RD, Rothwell DG, Pillai M, Burt DJ, Hawkins RE (2017) The clinical efficacy of first-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM5)-specific CAR T cells is limited by poor persistence and transient pre-conditioning- dependent respiratory toxicity. Cancer Immunol Immunother 66(11):1425–1436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-2034-7
Vedvyas Y, McCloskey JE, Yang Y, Min IM, Fahey TJ, Zarnegar R, Jin MM (2019) Manufacturing and preclinical validation of CAR T cells targeting ICAM-1 for advanced thyroid cancer therapy. Sci Rep 9(1):10634. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46938-7
Vitanza NA, Johnson AJ, Wilson AL, Brown C, Yokoyama JK, Künkele A, Park JR (2021) Locoregional infusion of HER2-specific CAR T cells in children and young adults with recurrent or refractory CNS tumors: an interim analysis. Nat Med 27(9):1544–1552. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01404-8
Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A, Locke FL, Jacobson CA, Hill BT, Reagan PM (2020) KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 382(14):1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1914347
Xie YJ, Dougan M, Jailkhani N, Ingram J, Fang T, Kummer L, Ploegh H (2019) Nanobody-based CAR T cells that target the tumor microenvironment inhibit the growth of solid tumors in immunocompetent mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(16):7624–7631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817147116
Yin Y, Boesteanu AC, Binder ZA, Xu C, Reid RA, Rodriguez JL, Johnson LA (2018) Checkpoint blockade reverses anergy in IL-13Rα2 humanized scFv-Based CAR T cells to treat murine and canine gliomas. Molecular Therapy Oncol 11:20–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omto.2018.08.002
Zhan X, Wang B, Li Z, Li J, Wang H, Chen L, Zhang Y (2019) Phase I trial of Claudin 18.2-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for advanced gastric and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 37(15):2509–2509. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.2509
Zhang C, Wang Z, Yang Z, Wang M, Li S, Li Y, Qian C (2017) Phase I Escalating-dose trial of CAR-T therapy targeting CEA+ metastatic colorectal cancers. Mol Ther 25(5):1248–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.010
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Ding Y, Fang Y, Wang P, Chu W, Qian Q (2021) Phase I clinical trial of EGFR-specific CAR-T cells generated by the piggyBac transposon system in advanced relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 147(12):3725–3734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03613-7
Zhao Y, Moon E, Carpenito C, Paulos CM, Liu X, Brennan AL, June CH (2010) Multiple injections of electroporated autologous t cells expressing a chimeric antigen receptor mediate regression of human disseminated tumor. Can Res 70(22):9053–9061. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2880
Zhao W-H, Liu J, Wang B-Y, Chen Y-X, Cao X-M, Yang Y, Zhang W-G (2018) A phase 1, open-label study of LCAR- B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol 11(1):141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-018-0681-6
Zhou Q, Munger ME, Highfill SL, Tolar J, Weigel BJ, Riddle M, Blazar BR (2010) Program death-1 signaling and regulatory T cells collaborate to resist the function of adoptively transferred cytotoxic T lymphocytes in advanced acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 116(14):2484–2493. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-03-275446
Funding
Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece. This manuscript received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: EK, IT; Literature search and data analysis: I-AK, IP, ET; Writing—original draft: KD, KK, IK; Writing—review and editing: KD, KK, IK, EK. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Drougkas, K., Karampinos, K., Karavolias, I. et al. Comprehensive clinical evaluation of CAR-T cell immunotherapy for solid tumors: a path moving forward or a dead end?. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 149, 2709–2734 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04547-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04547-4