Abstract
Key message
We identified two poplar clones of the same species as highly comparable, yet clones of two further species of the same genus to be distinctly different regarding multiple morphological and ecophysiological traits.
Abstract
Leaf morphology, wax composition, and residual (cuticular) transpiration of four poplar clones (two clones of the hybrid species P. × canescens, P. trichocarpa, and P. euphratica) were monitored from the beginning to end of the growing season 2020. A pronounced epicuticular wax coverage was found only with P. euphratica. As the most prominent substance classes of cuticular wax primary alcohols, alkanes and esters were identified with P. × canescens and P. trichocarpa, whereas esters and alkanes were completely lacking in P. euphratica. Wax amounts were slightly decreasing during the season and significantly lower wax amounts were found for newly formed leaves in summer compared to leaves of the same age formed in spring. Residual (cuticular) transpiration was about five to tenfold lower for P. × canescens compared with the two other poplar species. Interestingly, with three of the four investigated species, newly formed leaves in summer had lower wax coverages and lower rates of residual (cuticular) transpiration compared to leaves of exactly the same age formed in spring. Our findings were especially surprising with P. euphratica, representing the only one of the four investigated poplar species naturally growing in very dry and hot climates in Central Asia. Instead of developing very low rates of residual (cuticular) transpiration, it seems to be of major advantage for P. euphratica to develop a pronounced epicuticular wax bloom efficiently reflecting light.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Due to its considerably fast growth and ease of vegetative propagation, the genus of Populus became an increasingly interesting taxon for short-rotation agroforestry (Sannigrahi and Ragauskas 2010), even despite its generally high needs for a constant water supply caused by low water-use efficiencies (Blake et al. 1984; Souch and Stephens 1997). Especially after the publication of the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana as the first plant genome in 2000 (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative 2000), desires for a tree model organism arose with a species of the genus Populus being the favored candidate (Bradshaw et al. 2000; Taylor 2002). Ultimately, Populus trichocarpa became the first tree species with its genome sequence being published in 2006 (Tuskan et al. 2006), leading to a multitude of subsequent genetical studies (Jansson and Douglas 2007; Quesada et al. 2008) further strengthening the standing of P. trichocarpa as the new model organism of trees. In this study, we report on a subset of four commonly researched Populus clones covering two intra-sectional hybrids and two true species, belonging to three sections in total: two clones of the hybrid species P. × canescens (Aiton) Sm. (section Populus), P. trichocarpa Torr. & Gray ex Brayshaw (section Tacamahaca), and P. euphratica Oliv. (section Turanga). To date, genomes of these 4 genotypes are available, allowing for extensive genomic comparisons in the future.
The interface between leaves and the surrounding environment is formed by the plant cuticle (Mérida et al. 1981). It is composed of the cutin polymer and cuticular waxes (Jetter et al. 2006; Schreiber 2010; Stark and Tian 2006) deposited in the cutin polymer (intracuticular waxes) and on its outer surface (epicuticular waxes). Its main function is the protection of the living tissues inside the leaf from environmental stress factors. This includes (i) the restriction of uncontrolled water loss (cuticular transpiration) under drought conditions (Riederer and Schreiber 2001), (ii) protection from microbial pathogens (Andrews and Harris 2000) and herbivores (Alfaro-Tapia et al. 2007), and (iii) reflection of UV light (Shepherd and Griffiths 2006). The transpiration barrier of cuticles is essentially established by cuticular waxes, since upon wax extraction using organic solvents rates of cuticular transpiration increase by factors of 1–3 orders of magnitude (Schönherr and Lendzian 1981). When measuring cuticular transpiration using intact leaves instead of isolated astomatous cuticles, it has been suggested to use the term”residual transpiration” (Burghardt and Riederer 2003; Kerstiens 1996). This considers the fact that incomplete stomatal closure after leaf abscission can not always be excluded. Thus, cuticular transpiration (residual transpiration) measured with intact leaves must not but could potentially overestimate the true cuticular transpiration to some extent (Burghardt and Riederer 2003). Therefore, in the following, we will use the term “residual (cuticular) transpiration” to indicate that the transpiration was measured with intact leaves and not with isolated astomatous cuticles.
We investigated in detail the cuticular wax composition and residual transpiration of four poplar clones. We intended to find out to what extent the four investigated poplar clones are similar or different in wax composition and residual transpiration, and whether this is related in some way to the climate of their natural habitats. The information presented here could be helpful in future genetic approaches deciding which of the four clones will be best suited for molecular biological and ecophysiological investigations on wax biosynthesis and the effect of an altered wax composition on residual (cuticular) transpiration, or whether all 4 clones are equally suited.
Materials and methods
Poplar clones investigated
The four different clones were chosen because (i) they represent widely used models in poplar research, (ii) their genomes were sequenced and published and they can be genetically modified, and (iii) they reflect very different adaptations to their natural habitats. P. × canescens hybrids are frequently occurring in close geographical proximity to their parent species P. alba (van Loo et al. 2008) which prefers floodplain ecosystems of the Northern Temperate Zone (Eckenwalder 1996). One of the P. × canescens clones (“84 K”, Qiu et al. 2019), a cross between P. alba and P. tremula var. glandulosa, is frequently researched in Asian geographical regions. The other clone (“INRA 717-1B4”, Mader et al. 2016), a cross between P. tremula and P. alba is more prominently investigated in Europe. In the following, the two clones will be abbreviated A × T and T × A, respectively. P. trichocarpa naturally situates in Pacific coastal and adjacent inland areas of north-western North America (Isebrands and Richardson 2014). The genotype “Nisqually 1” of P. trichocarpa from North America was the first poplar species to be sequenced (Tuskan et al. 2006). In strong contrast, P. euphratica may be considered as the geographical outlier species. It is well adapted to semi-arid desert environments (Ottow et al. 2005) and may tolerate extreme light intensities and temperatures (Zhou et al. 2010) as long as its roots can reach a continuously available groundwater table (Aishan et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2006). Individuals of the species P. euphratica (clone “B2” from Israel was used in this study) have also been sequenced (Ma et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2020).
Cultivation of plants
In early 2018, two individuals of each of the four clones from axenic tissue cultures were transferred to soil. They were slowly adapted to growth outside in an experimental field of the University of Bonn via stepwise growth in a climate chamber (6 weeks) and a greenhouse (6 weeks). Plants were left outside in pots for the first 2 years and were always strongly cut-back in autumn of 2018 and 2019.
Pot volumes were continuously adapted to plant size (about 2 m height in 2 years) leading to a final pot volume of 40 L filled with standardized soil (Einheitserde Classic Type Topf 1.5, Einheitserde Werksverband e.V., Germany). A constant drop irrigation system secured adequate water supply to the plants. Weather conditions were monitored by an MWS 9–5 system (Reinhardt System- und Messelectronic GmbH, Germany). The daily light integral (DLI) was calculated by integrating the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of a given day (Fig. 1). During the year 2020, the mean temperature ranged between 6 and 22 °C, the precipitation between 6 and 102 mm, and the DLI was between 122 and 1555 mol m−2 month−1. Especially the study period (April to September) was characterized by arid climatic conditions with high light radiation, high temperature, and significantly reduced amounts of precipitation compared to other years.
Leaf sampling
Leaves were harvested in the third year of the plants growing outside (2020) from newly forming branches in spring. Both leaf growth and development were monitored starting from bud break on a weekly basis. Thus, leaf age over the growing season could exactly be identified. Leaf areas were fully developed within the fifth week after bud break. Leaves were harvested at the age of 5, 11, and 17 weeks. Towards the end of the season (September 2020), another set of 5-week-old leaves, which started to grow mid of August 2020, was harvested (Fig. 1). To ensure that the harvested leaves did not show early macroscopically “invisible” signs of disease infection, the chlorophyll content of five leaves for each clone and harvesting time was estimated with a Force A device (Dualex Scientific, France).
Leaf anatomical and morphological analysis
The projected lamina surface areas of leaves from each harvest were measured using a scanner (Canon, Japan). Leaf fresh mass and leaf dry mass (also used to calculate the relative water content) of leaves from each harvest were measured using an analytical balance (Sartorius, Germany) with a resolution of ± 0.01 mg. Leaf mass per area (LMA, mg cm−2) was calculated by dividing the leaf dry mass by its projected lamina surface area. The relative water content was calculated as a percentage: (fresh mass—dry mass)/fresh mass × 100.
Contrary to all other morphological parameters, the presence of stomata and contact angles of water were determined only with 11-week-old leaves. Stomatal presence was determined by light microscopy after taking imprints with nail polish from both leaf sides. Adaxial leaf surfaces of all four clones were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S200 Cambridge Instruments, Great Britain). 1 cm2 leaf segments were mounted to aluminum sample stubs using double-sided adhesive tape and dried over silica gel for at least 24 h. Dried samples were sputter-coated (SCD 040, Balzers Union, Germany) with gold for 30 s using 30 mA current (ca. 15 nm thickness). Leaves were examined by SEM at 15 kV accelerating voltage and a working distance of 11 mm. Contact angles of water were measured on adaxial leaf sides using a Drop Shape Analyzer (Krüss, Germany). Leaf samples were fixed to glass slides using double-sided adhesive tape. Five droplets of 10 µl were placed on each leaf. Three independent leaves were investigated for each clone.
Cuticular wax composition analysis
The wax composition of 5-, 11- and 17-week-old leaves grown in spring and of 5-week-old leaves grown in summer was analyzed. Wax extraction was obtained by tightly placing chloroform-filled glass vials with broad rims on adaxial leaf sides. Thus, leaf areas for wax extraction were precisely defined (0.30 cm2 for the narrow P. euphratica leaves and 1.28 cm2 for the leaves of the other 3 clones). Glass vials closed with the leaves were turned upside down for 10 s and slightly shaken to ensure an efficient wax extraction. Previous tests with other species had shown that longer extraction would rather result in tissue damages by CHCl3 leading to contaminations with internal lipids (Bringe et al. 2006; Richardson et al. 2005). For each biological replicate, four extracts from the adaxial leaf side were pooled. Four to six independent leaves of each clone were taken for analytical investigations. The internal standard for wax quantification (10 µg C24 alkane, Tetracosane, Fluka, Germany) was added to chloroform before wax extraction. Chloroform was completely evaporated at 60 °C under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Samples were derivatized for 45 min at 70 °C after adding again 250 µl chloroform, 20 µl BSTFA (N,O-Bis(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide, Macherey–Nagel, Germany) and 20 µl pyridine (Sigma Aldrich, Germany). Derivatization leads to the formation of trimethylsilyl (TMS) esters and ethers of alcohols and acids (Hauke and Schreiber 1998). 1 µl of each sample was analyzed by gas chromatography equipped with on-column injection. Flame ionization detection coupled to gas chromatography (GC-FID: 6890 N) was used for the quantitative determination of wax amounts. Mass spectrometry coupled to gas chromatography (GC–MS: 7890B) was used for the qualitative identification of wax compounds. Compounds were identified based on fragmentation patterns using an in-house created mass spectral library. Conditions after sample injection were 50 °C for 2 min, a temperature increase of 40 °C min−1 up to 200 °C, 2 min at 200 °C, 3 °C min−1 up to 310 °C and finally 30 min at 310 °C. The flow rate of the hydrogen (GC-FID) or helium (GC–MS) carrier gas was 2 ml min−1 and DB-1 columns (30 m length, 0.32 mm diameter, 0.2 µm coating thickness; Agilent J&W) were employed.
Leaf stomatal and residual (cuticular) transpiration
All transpiration measurements have been performed with fully developed 5-week-old leaves formed in the beginning (April to May) and the end (August to September) of the growing season. Stomatal conductances were measured using an SC-1 Leaf Porometer (Decagon, USA) in the morning between 10 to 11 a.m. Residual (cuticular) transpiration was measured using intact leaves. Leaves were harvested at the experimental field in the morning, stored in sealed plastic bags, and transported within 60 min to the institute. With all stomata fully closing after cutting off leaves, subsequent measurements will mainly represent cuticular transpiration (Kerstiens 1996). Due to the unavoidable delays in measurements, stomatal transpiration of each leaf before abscission was evaluated right at the site of harvest using the leaf porometer. After measuring the fresh mass and determination of leaf areas in the institute, leaves were stored at 25 °C in plastic boxes over activated silica gel (2% relative humidity). Decreasing leaf masses were measured every 20 min up to 6 h. For each measurement, rates of water loss per area and time (g m−2 s−1) were measured. Permeances (m s−1) were calculated by dividing rates of water loss by the driving force (concentration gradient of water inside the leaf minus outside). Since leaves were kept at 2% humidity, the driving force for residual (cuticular) transpiration was essentially given by the water concentration inside the leaf, which was assumed to be close to 106 g m−3. To allow direct comparison, stomatal transpirations (measured in the field in mmol m−2 s−1) were converted into permeances (m s−1) according to McDermitt (1990). The permeance of each measurement period was plotted against its corresponding estimated relative water deficit, which was calculated from water loss divided by the leaf fresh mass of the respective measurement period. Stomatal transpirations of intact leaves were assumed to be measured at a relative water deficit close to zero.
Statistical analysis
Numbers of investigated biological replicates were between 3 and 6 leaves for each clone, experiment, and harvest. Statistical tests (two-sample t test or one-way ANOVA with Fisher’s LSD post hoc test) at a significance level of p ≤ 0.05 were applied (OriginPro 20, OriginLab Corporation, USA). Statistical differences were tested on the 95% level. Boxplots or means with standard deviation are shown.
Results
Bud break and leaf morphology
Bud break (Fig. 1) and leaf development of P. trichocarpa, was always 1 week earlier (calendar week 14 in 2020) than the 2 clones of P. × canescens (calendar week 15). Bud break and leaf development of P. euphratica was 1 week delayed (calendar week 16). After a strong cut-back of the plants in calendar week 28, the very same pattern of bud break and development of the 4 clones was observed after a 3- to 5-week recovery period in calendar weeks 31, 32, and 33. In the fifth week leaves had fully expanded, resulting in mean projected leaf areas of about 32 cm2 (both clones of P. × canescens), 16 cm2 (P. trichocarpa), and 8 cm2 (P. euphratica) at a leaf age of 5 weeks (Fig. 2). Dense trichomes were still visible on the abaxial sides of clones of P. × canescens, less for P. trichocarpa, and none for P. euphratica. Adaxial surfaces were devoid of any visible trichomes for all clones (Fig. 2). Stomata could only be identified in light microscopy and SEM on the lower leaf side of both P. × canescens clones (hypostomatous leaves), whereas P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica were amphistomatous.
Although fresh mass per leaf area varied significantly between 16 and 36 mg cm−2, the LMA was very similar with 6–8 mg cm−2 for each clone (Fig. 3a). This was due to differences in the relative water content with P. euphratica having a water content of 80% compared to the 3 other clones with 61 to 65% (Fig. 3b). Chlorophyll contents for all clones and harvests were between 25 and 35 µg cm−2 with no obvious seasonal trends (no data shown). Also all other morphological parameters (projected lamina surface area, chlorophyll content, mass per area, and relative water content) estimated for each clone and harvest were not changing after leaves were fully developed and also not for the newly grown leaves of 5 weeks age after the strong cut-back in July (no data shown).
Contact angles on adaxial leaf sides of both clones of P. × canescens varied between 85° to 90° whereas contact angles were slightly lower on leaves of P. trichocarpa (70.8°). Leaf surfaces of P. euphratica were hardly wettable since they showed contact angles of around 160° (Fig. 3c).
Scanning electron microscopic investigations
A low abundance of epicuticular wax crystals (granules and platelets) was visible on adaxial leaf surfaces of both clones of P. × canescens (Fig. 4a, b). P. trichocarpa had a smooth leaf surface with only very few visible wax crystals (Fig. 4c). P. euphratica showed a very dense coverage with epicuticular wax platelets (Fig. 4d). Folds and edges on the leaf surface of P. trichocarpa (Fig. 4c) are considered to be drying artifacts.
Cuticular wax composition
Five substance classes of linear long-chain aliphatic compounds (acids, aldehydes, alcohols, alkanes, and esters) of cuticular waxes were identified in 5-week-old leaves of both hybrids of P. × canescens and P. trichocarpa (Fig. 5a–c). Cuticular wax of P. euphratica was composed of only the three substance classes acids, aldehydes, and alcohols. Alkanes and esters were completely missing (Fig. 5d). Chain lengths of the esters ranged from C34 to C46, chain lengths of the 4 other substance classes ranged from C20 to C31 (Fig. 5). Alcohols, alkanes, and esters were the three prominent substance classes in both P. × canescens hybrids (Fig. 5e). In P. trichocarpa, only alcohols and alkanes were the two most prominent substance classes, whereas only alcohols were the most prominent substance class in P. euphratica (Fig. 5e). Total amounts of wax varied between 24 and 41 µg cm−2 with one of the P. × canescens clones (A × T) having the lowest wax amount and the other P. × canescens clone (T × A) having the highest wax amount (Fig. 5e).
The qualitative wax composition did not significantly change over the season with increasing leaf ages (5 weeks to 11 weeks and 17 weeks) of leaves formed in spring and with 5-week-old leaves formed in summer (Fig. 6b, d, f, h). There was a tendency that total amounts of wax in hybrid A × T (24, 22, and 19 µg cm−2) and P. trichocarpa (27, 20, and 14 µg cm−2) continuously decreased from 5-week- over 11-week- to 17-week-old leaves (Fig. 6a, c). Five-week-old leaves of all four clones newly formed in summer had about 1.5- (A × T) to twofold (T × A, P. tri, and P. euph) lower wax amounts compared to 5-week-old leaves formed in spring (Fig. 6a, c, e, g).
Stomatal and residual (cuticular) transpiration
Stomatal conductances of leaves harvested in May and September were between 250 and 350 mmol m−2 s−1, which equals 75–115 × 10–9 m s−1 (Fig. 7). After leaf abscission, permeances (m s−1) steeply decreased by 1–2 orders of magnitude (Fig. 7). The linear region between relative water deficits of 0.1 to 0.5 represents residual (cuticular) transpiration.
All values on the plateaus, between relative water deficits ranging from about 0.1 to 0.5, were used to calculate the permeance means of 5-week-old leaves of each clone, harvested in spring (May) and summer (September) (Fig. 8). Mean residual permeances varied between 1.7 to 1.9 × 10–9 m s−1 (T × A and A × T) and 10 to 11.3 × 10–9 m s−1 (P. tri and P. euph) for leaves harvested in spring. In most instances, lower permeances were calculated for leaves harvested in summer. They were 0.9 to 2.4 × 10–9 m s−1 for T × A and A × T and 4.8 to 6.5 × 10–9 m s−1 for P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica, respectively (Fig. 8).
Discussion
As the spring bud break of a full-grown poplar tree is under tight genetic control and needs a specific temperature sum for initiation (Jansson and Douglas 2007), parallel leaf development leads to all primary leaves being almost the same age at any given date. Leaf morphology of both P. × canescens clones appears to be intermediate between those of parent species P. alba and P. tremula (Eckenwalder 1996; Isebrands and Richardson 2014; Lexer et al. 2005) and also morphological parameters of P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica leaves are in accordance to those previously reported (Al Afas et al. 2007; Calagari et al. 2006; Ceulemans et al. 1987; Liu et al. 2015; Xu et al. 2016). The succulent, lanceolate leaves of P. euphratica observed here are known to fulfill a water storage function especially in young trees that do not yet develop into the reproductive phase (Ottow et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2016). This higher water content obviously represents an adaptation to the hot and dry climate where P. euphratica is naturally growing. Amphistomaty of P. euphratica leaves is broadly reported as a key morphological trait (Liu et al. 2015; Mirzaie-Nodoushan et al. 2015; Zheng et al. 2007; Zhou et al. 2010) potentially to compensate for thicker leaf laminas and reduce distances of diffusion into the tissue. In P. trichocarpa, which normally is hypostomatic, amphistomaty is hypothesized to be introduced by hybridizations (Al Afas et al. 2006, 2007; Ceulemans et al. 1984; Dillen et al. 2008; Dunlap and Stettler 2001; Gornall and Guy 2007; McKown et al. 2014; Schulte and Hinckley 1987).
Each cuticular surface structure observed in this study is in concordance with previous reports in the literature (Alfaro-Tapia et al. 2007; Guzmán et al. 2014; Huang et al. 2018; Meng et al. 2019; Schreiber et al. 2006; Szuba et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2016; Zheng et al. 2007) but to our knowledge, their influence on wettability has not been reported for poplar before. The observed low abundance of wax granules of both P. × canescens clones and P. trichocarpa resulted in moderate contact angles varying between 70° and 90°. In contrast to this, the very rough leaf surface with dense wax platelets of P. euphratica resulted in contact angles of almost 160°. On such a superhydrophobic surface (Wang and Jiang 2007) water immediately forms spherical droplets that will roll off even at the lowest angles of tilt, commonly referred to as the “Lotus effect” (Barthlott and Neinhuis 1997). This is typically associated with self-cleaning abilities of plants when subjected to rain (Barthlott and Neinhuis 1997). However, this property appears to be useless if the plant is growing in environments with yearly precipitations close to zero. Instead, we suggest that these wax platelets on P. euphratica leaves must accomplish a different function. In a hot and dry habitat pronounced three-dimensional epicuticular wax crystalloids should help in efficiently reflecting light and thereby protect leaves from heat and harmful UV radiation (Shepherd and Griffiths 2006). The cuticular wax morphology of P. euphratica is dominated by wax platelets, which have been described to be formed by primary alcohols (Barthlott et al. 1998; Ensikat et al. 2006; Koch and Barthlott 2006) that are also representing the major substance class in P. euphratica wax as it was found here. For example barley, a member of the Graminaceae family also originating from arid regions, is known to exhibit a comparable epicuticular wax structure and alcohol-dominated wax chemistry (Richardson et al. 2005). For the other three clones, the formation of epicuticular wax crystalloids by self-assembly (Koch et al. 2004) may be less favored, as they are composed of a broader mixture of substance classes. Nonetheless, wax crystals on adaxial sides of P. trichocarpa leaves have also been reported to consist of mainly alcohols, as analyzed by secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) (Kulkarni et al. 2018).
In our study, both clones of P. × canescens had a very similar wax composition which was dominated by alcohols, alkanes, and esters. This is different from a previous analysis of the wax composition of clone A × T where wax esters were completely missing, but considerably longer chain lengths (C31 to C35) of all other functional groups were described (Meng et al. 2019). These differences in composition and quantity of each substance class might be attributed to different environmental growth conditions and leaf ages investigated. But differences might also arise from the methodological approaches used. Unlike our approach using on-column injection for cuticular wax analysis, a split/splitless injection for GC analysis will not recover long-chain wax esters since they will be trapped in the liner of the injector. Similar methodological limitations were encountered when analyzing cuticular waxes of P. trichocarpa since in a qualitative isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) analysis only alkanes were described as the wax fraction (Kahmen et al. 2011). However, the alkanes were very similar to the alkanes found in our study. In addition, a MALDI-TOF-MS analysis after cryo-adhesive-isolation of epicuticular waxes of P. trichocarpa identified 19 individual compounds belonging to the functional groups of alcohols, alkanes, and esters (Kulkarni et al. 2018), again sharing a high similarity to our own results. Further qualitative and quantitative differences are encountered when comparing the leaf wax composition of P. euphratica trees cultivated in Germany to plants grown outside in their natural habitat in Inner Mongolia (Xu et al. 2016). Acids, aldehydes, and alcohols but not aldehydes and esters were identified as main substance classes when investigating juvenile (lanceolate) leaves grown in Germany in our study, whereas considerable amounts of alkanes were detected after GC-FID/MS analysis of leaves sampled from their natural habitat in Mongolia (Xu et al. 2016). Reductions in wax amounts of older leaves (11 and 17 weeks) observed in our study are attributed to potential wax degradation. Abrasion or erosion of surface lipids has been reported (Cameron et al. 2006; Hauke and Schreiber 1998; Neinhuis and Barthlott 1998), especially if plants are grown outside where mechanical stimuli as wind and rain are significantly higher (Shepherd and Griffiths 2006). When leaves of the exact same age (5-week-old) that developed in spring (May) or summer (September) were compared, significantly lower total wax amounts were found for the summer leaves of all 4 clones. We hypothesize that a much lower irradiance in the second growth period of the year might be one of the key factors leading to a reduced wax accumulation (Baker 1974).
Values of permeances measured here for intact poplar leaves are in a similar range when compared to permeances of intact leaves, leaf disks, or isolated astomatous cuticular membranes of different species (Kirsch et al. 1997; Schreiber 2001; Schreiber and Riederer 1996; Schreiber and Schönherr 2009). The hypostomaty of P. × canescens offers the advantage of isolating astomatous cuticles of the adaxial leaf side. This allows measuring true rates of cuticular transpiration for P. × canescens (Schreiber et al. 2006). Permeances of P. × canescens clones measured here vary between 0.9 and 2.4 × 10–9 m s−1 and they are very similar to permeances of 2.7 × 10–9 m s−1 measured with isolated astomatous P. × canescens cuticles from a mature grey poplar tree growing outside in Bonn (Schreiber et al. 2006). This is a very good indication that residual rates of transpiration measured with intact P. × canescens leaves are in fact reflecting cuticular rates of transpiration. Different from both P. × canescens clones, it was described that some clones of P. trichocarpa are unresponsive in stomatal closure towards stress (Schulte and Hinckley 1987), and also for P. euphratica stomata have been reported to show a non-uniform behavior (Zheng et al. 2007). This described incomplete closure of stomata of P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica might explain why residual permeances were about 10 times higher compared to both P. × canescens clones. Thus, residual transpiration measured with P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica might to some extent represent overestimations of the true cuticular transpiration (Burghardt and Riederer 2003; Kerstiens 1996), whereas those measured for both clones of P. × canescens fit very well to the previously reported cuticular transpiration (Schreiber et al. 2006). When comparing both sets of 5-week-old leaves grown in spring and summer, it is evident that the leaves of three of the four poplar clones harvested in September show twofold lower permeances, even though total wax amounts of all clones are between 1.5- and twofold lower. This is a further example that higher wax amounts do not necessarily correlate with lower rates of cuticular transpiration and vice versa (Jetter and Riederer 2016; Sánchez et al. 2001; Schreiber and Riederer 1996; Zeisler-Diehl et al. 2018). Instead of cuticular wax amounts, it has been suggested that the mean carbon chain length of wax molecules might represent a potential feature negatively correlating with the transpiration properties of cuticles (Hauke and Schreiber 1998; Leide et al. 2007; Macková et al. 2013; Riederer and Schneider 1990). Except for one P. × canescens clone (A × T), lower rates of residual (cuticular) transpiration of leaves harvested in summer were in fact observed alongside higher weighted mean carbon chain lengths of the cuticular wax (Fig. 9). Since P. euphratica is growing in an arid and hot climate, it was initially hypothesized by us that P. euphratica should be characterized by a considerably lower residual (cuticular) transpiration compared to P. × canescens and P. trichocarpa. But the typical xeromorphic adaptations of P. euphratica such as smaller and succulent leaves, which can help to survive after long periods of stomatal closure in response to stress (Bueno et al. 2019), are obviously more important than low rates of residual (cuticular) transpiration. In addition, roots of P. euphratica in their natural environment must have constant contact with the groundwater table (Aishan et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2006; Zhou et al. 2010), making true water limitations even in an arid climate a less abundant scenario. As a consequence, this will allow keeping both, stomatal and residual rates of transpiration high, which is essential in cooling the leaves in a hot and dry habitat (Lange 1959).
Conclusion
In terms of leaf morphology, wax composition, and residual (cuticular) transpiration both clones of P. × canescens are not very different, which ensures good comparability of ecophysiological data acquired with either clone. The genetically more distant P. trichocarpa and P. euphratica (Cervera et al. 2005) had different leaf morphologies, cuticular wax compositions, and significantly higher residual (cuticular) transpiration rates. Physiological transport experiments that might require isolated astomatous cuticles can be performed with clones of P. × canescens. In addition, highly efficient transformations of both parent species of P. × canescens (Fladung et al. 1997; Ma et al. 2019) make this hybrid a valuable candidate for the creation and investigation of different mutant lines in the future, whereas P. trichocarpa is the best genetically characterized Populus species to date and may serve as a reference for extensive genome studies. In contrast, the environmentally driven specialization of cuticular wax structure and composition together with a fairly high residual (cuticular) transpiration of P. euphratica make it an interesting species for future stress-physiological studies.
Author contribution statement
LS and PG designed the experiments. LH and PG performed the experiments. LS supervised the experiments. LS, PG, and LH analyzed the data. PG wrote the manuscript. LS and LH revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Aishan T, Halik Ü, Kurban A, Cyffka B, Kuba M, Betz F, Keyimu M (2015) Eco-morphological response of floodplain forests (Populus euphratica Oliv.) to water diversion in the lower Tarim River, northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 73:533–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-3033-4
Al Afas N, Marron N, Ceulemans R (2006) Clonal variation in stomatal characteristics related to biomass production of 12 poplar (Populus) clones in a short rotation coppice culture. Environ Exp Bot 58:279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.09.003
Al Afas N, Marron N, Ceulemans R (2007) Variability in Populus leaf anatomy and morphology in relation to canopy position, biomass production, and varietal taxon. Ann for Sci 64:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2007029
Alfaro-Tapia A, Verdugo JA, Astudillo LA, Ramírez CC (2007) Effect of epicuticular waxes of poplar hybrids on the aphid Chaitophorus leucomelas (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Appl Entomol 131:486–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2007.01169.x
Andrews JH, Harris RF (2000) The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:145–180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.145
Baker EA (1974) The influence of environment on leaf wax development in Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera. New Phytol 73:955–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1974.tb01324.x
Barthlott W, Neinhuis C (1997) Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta 202:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050096
Barthlott W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I, Wilhelmi W (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc 126:237–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02529.x
Blake TJ, Tschaplinski TJ, Eastham A (1984) Stomatal control of water use efficiency in poplar clones and hybrids. Can J Bot 62:1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.1139/b84-182
Bradshaw HD, Ceulemans R, Davis J, Stettler R (2000) Emerging model systems in plant biology: poplar (Populus) as a model forest tree. J Plant Growth Regul 19:306–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003440000030
Bringe K, Schumacher CFA, Schmitz-Eiberger M, Steiner U, Oerke E-C (2006) Ontogenetic variation in chemical and physical characteristics of adaxial apple leaf surfaces. Phytochemistry 67:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.10.018
Bueno A, Sancho-Knapik D, Gil-Pelegrín E, Leide J, Peguero-Pina JJ, Burghardt M, Riederer M (2019) Cuticular wax coverage and its transpiration barrier properties in Quercus coccifera L. leaves: does the environment matter? Tree Physiol 40:827–840. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz0110
Burghardt M, Riederer M (2003) Ecophysiological relevance of cuticular transpiration of deciduous and evergreen plants in relation to stomatal closure and leaf water potential. J Exp Bot 54:1941–1949. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg195
Calagari M, Modirrahmati AR, Asadi F (2006) Morphological variation in leaf traits of Populus euphratica oliv natural populations. Int J Agric Biol 8:754–758
Cameron KD, Teece MA, Smart LB (2006) Increased accumulation of cuticular wax and expression of lipid transfer protein in response to periodic drying events in leaves of tree tobacco. Plant Physiol 140:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.069724
Cervera MT, Storme V, Soto A, Ivens B, van Montagu M, Rajora OP, Boerjan W (2005) Intraspecific and interspecific genetic and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Populus based on AFLP markers. Theor Appl Genet 111:1440–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0076-2
Ceulemans R, Impens I, Steenackers V (1984) Stomatal and anatomical leaf characteristics of 10 Populus clones. Can J Bot 62:513–518. https://doi.org/10.1139/b84-076
Ceulemans R, Impens I, Steenackers V (1987) Variations in photosynthetic, anatomical, and enzymatic leaf traits and correlations with growth in recently selected Populus hybrids. Can J Bot 17:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-047
Chen YP, Chen YN, Li WH, Xu CC (2006) Characterization of photosynthesis of Populus euphratica grown in the arid region. Photosynthetica 44:622–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-006-0081-y
Dillen SY, Marron N, Koch B, Ceulemans R (2008) Genetic variation of stomatal traits and carbon isotope discrimination in two hybrid poplar families (Populus deltoides ‘S9-2’ 3 P. nigra ‘Ghoy’ and P. deltoides ‘S9-2’ 3 P. trichocarpa ‘V24’). Ann Bot 102:399–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn107
Dunlap JM, Stettler RF (2001) Variation in leaf epidermal and stomatal traits of Populus trichocarpa from two transects across the Washington Cascades. Can J Bot 79:528–536. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-79-5-528
Eckenwalder JE (1996) Systematics and evolution of Populus. In: Stettler RF, Bradshaw T, Heilman P, Hinckley T (eds) Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation, part 1. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, pp 7–32
Ensikat HJ, Boese M, Mader W, Barthlott W, Koch K (2006) Crystallinity of plant epicuticular waxes: electron and X-ray diffraction studies. Chem Phys Lipids 144:45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2006.06.016
Fladung M, Kumar S, Ahuja MR (1997) Genetic transformation of Populus genotypes with different chimaeric gene constructs: transformation efficiency and molecular analysis. Transgenic Res 6:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018421620040
Gornall JL, Guy RD (2007) Geographic variation in ecophysiological traits of black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa). Can J Bot 85:1202–1213. https://doi.org/10.1139/B07-079
Guzmán P, Fernández V, Khayet M, García ML, Fernández A, Gil L (2014) Ultrastructure of plant leaf cuticles in relation to sample preparation as observed by transmission electron microscopy. Sci Wor J 2014:963921. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/963921
Hauke V, Schreiber L (1998) Ontogenetic and seasonal development of wax composition and cuticular transpiration of ivy (Hedera helix L.) sun and shade leaves. Planta 207:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250050456
Huang Y-L, Zimmerman NB, Arnold AE (2018) Observations on the early establishment of foliar endophytic fungi in leaf discs and living leaves of a model woody angiosperm, Populus trichocarpa (Salicaceae). J Fungi. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof4020058
Isebrands JG, Richardson J (2014) Poplars and willows: trees for society and the environment. CABI, Wallingford, UK
Jansson S, Douglas CJ (2007) Populus: a model system for plant biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:435–458. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103956
Jetter R, Riederer M (2016) Localization of the transpiration barrier in the epi- and intracuticular waxes of eight plant species: water transport resistances are associated with fatty acyl rather than alicyclic components. Plant Physiol 170:921–934. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.01699
Jetter R, Kunst L, Samuels AL (2006) Composition of plant cuticular waxes. In: Müller C, Riederer M (eds) Biology of the plant cuticle. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 145–181
Kahmen A, Dawson TE, Vieth A, Sachse D (2011) Leaf wax n-alkane δD values are determined early in the ontogeny of Populus trichocarpa leaves when grown under controlled environmental conditions. Plant Cell Environ 34:1639–1651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02360.x
Kerstiens G (1996) Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance. J Exp Bot 47:1813–1832. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.12.1813
Kirsch T, Kaffarnik F, Riederer M, Schreiber L (1997) Cuticular permeability of the three tree species Prunus laurocerasus L., Ginkgo biloba L. and Juglans regia L.: comparative investigation of the transport properties of intact leaves, isolated cuticles and reconstituted cuticular waxes. J Exp Bot 48:1035–1045. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/48.5.1035
Koch K, Barthlott W (2006) Plant epicuticular waxes: chemistry, form, self-assembly and function. Nat Prod Commun 1:1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X0600101123
Koch K, Neinhuis C, Ensikat H-J, Barthlott W (2004) Self assembly of epicuticular waxes on living plant surfaces imaged by atomic force microscopy (AFM). J Exp Bot 55:711–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh077
Kulkarni P, Dost M, Bulut ÖD, Welle A, Böcker S, Boland W, Svatoš A (2018) Secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging and multivariate data analysis reveal co-aggregation patterns of Populus trichocarpa leaf surface compounds on a micrometer scale. Plant J 93:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13763
Lange OL (1959) Untersuchungen über Wärmehaushalt und Hitzeresistenz mauretanischer Wüsten- und Savannenpflanzen. Flora Oder Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung 147:595–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-1615(17)31984-5
Leide J, Hildebrandt U, Reussing K, Riederer M, Vogg G (2007) The Developmental pattern of tomato fruit wax accumulation and its impact on cuticular transpiration barrier properties: effects of a deficiency in a β-Ketoacyl-Coenzyme A Synthase (LeCER6). Plant Physiol 144:1667–1679. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.099481
Lexer C, Fay MF, Joseph JA, Nica M-S, Heinze B (2005) Barrier to gene flow between two ecologically divergent Populus species, P. alba (white poplar) and P. tremula (European aspen): the role of ecology and life history in gene introgression. Mol Ecol 14:1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02469.x
Liu Y, Li X, Chen G, Li M, Liu M, Liu D (2015) Epidermal micromorphology and mesophyll structure of Populus euphratica heteromorphic leaves at different development stages. PLoS ONE 10:e0137701. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137701
Ma T, Wang J, Zhou G, Yue Z, Hu Q, Chen Y, Liu B, Qiu Q, Wang Z, Zhang J, Wang K, Jiang D, Gou C, Yu L, Zhan D, Zhou R, Luo W, Ma H, Yang Y, Pan S, Fang D, Luo Y, Wang X, Wang G, Wang J, Wang Q, Lu X, Chen Z, Liu J, Lu Y, Yin Y, Yang H, Abbott RJ, Wu Y, Wan D, Li J, Yin T, Lascoux M, Difazio SP, Tuskan GA, Wang J, Liu J, Jianquan L (2013) Genomic insights into salt adaptation in a desert poplar. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3797
Ma J, Wan D, Duan B, Bai X, Bai Q, Chen N, Ma T (2019) Genome sequence and genetic transformation of a widely distributed and cultivated poplar. Plant Biotechnol J 17:451–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12989
Macková J, Vašková M, Macek P, Hronková M, Schreiber L, Šantrůček J (2013) Plant response to drought stress simulated by ABA application: changes in chemical composition of cuticular waxes. Environ Exp Bot 86:70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.06.005
Mader M, Le Paslier M-C, Bounon R, Bérard A, Rampant PF, Fladung M, Leplé J-C, Kersten B (2016) Whole-genome draft assembly of Populus tremula x P. alba clone INRA 717–1B4. Silvae Genet 65:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/sg-2016-0019
McDermitt DK (1990) Sources of error in the estimation of stomatal conductance and transpiration from porometer data. Hort Sci 25:1538–1548
McKown AD, Guy RD, Quamme L, Klápště J, La Mantia J, Constabel CP, El-Kassaby YA, Hamelin RC, Zifkin M, Azam MS (2014) Association genetics, geography and ecophysiology link stomatal patterning in Populus trichocarpa with carbon gain and disease resistance trade-offs. Mol Ecol 23:5771–5790. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12969
Meng S, Cao Y, Li H, Bian Z, Wang D, Lian C, Yin W, Xia X (2019) PeSHN1 regulates water-use efficiency and drought tolerance by modulating wax biosynthesis in poplar. Tree Physiol 39:1371–1386. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpz033
Mérida T, Schönherr J, Schmidt HW (1981) Fine structure of plant cuticles in relation to water permeability: the fine structure of the cuticle of Clivia miniata Reg. leaves. Planta 152:259–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00385154
Mirzaie-Nodoushan H, Ghamari-Zare A, Tavousi Rad F, Yousefifard M (2015) Inducing genetic variation in growth related characteristics of poplar germplasm, by producing inter-specific hybrids between P. alba and P. euphratica. Silvae Genet 64:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086308
Neinhuis C, Barthlott W (1998) Seasonal changes of leaf surface contamination in beech, oak, and ginkgo in relation to leaf micromorphology and wettability. New Phytol 138:91–98. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00882.x
Ottow EA, Brinker M, Teichmann T, Fritz E, Kaiser W, Brosché M, Kangasjärvi J, Jiang X, Polle A (2005) Populus euphratica displays apoplastic sodium accumulation, osmotic adjustment by decreases in calcium and soluble carbohydrates, and develops leaf succulence under salt stress. Plant Physiol 139:1762–1772. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.069971
Qiu D, Bai S, Ma J, Zhang L, Shao F, Zhang K, Yang Y, Sun T, Huang J, Zhou Y, Galbraith DW, Wang Z, Sun G (2019) The genome of Populus alba x Populus tremula var. glandulosa clone 84K. DNA Res 26:423–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsz020
Quesada T, Li Z, Dervinis C, Li Y, Bocock PN, Tuskan GA, Casella G, Davis JM, Kirst M (2008) Comparative analysis of the transcriptomes of Populus trichocarpa and Arabidopsis thaliana suggests extensive evolution of gene expression regulation in angiosperms. New Phytol 180:408–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02586.x
Richardson A, Franke R, Kerstiens G, Jarvis M, Schreiber L, Fricke W (2005) Cuticular wax deposition in growing barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaves commences in relation to the point of emergence of epidermal cells from the sheaths of older leaves. Planta 222:472–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-1552-2
Riederer M, Schneider G (1990) The effect of the environment on the permeability and composition of Citrus leaf cuticles : II. Composition of soluble cuticular lipids and correlation with transport properties. Planta 180:154–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193990
Riederer M, Schreiber L (2001) Protecting against water loss: analysis of the barrier properties of plant cuticles. J Exp Bot 52:2023–2032. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.363.2023
Sánchez FJ, Manzanares M, de Andrés EF, Tenorio JL, Ayerbe L (2001) Residual transpiration rate, epicuticular wax load and leaf colour of pea plants in drought conditions. Influence on harvest index and canopy temperature. Eur J Agron 15:57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(01)00094-6
Sannigrahi P, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Poplar as a feedstock for biofuels: a review of compositional characteristics. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 4:209–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.206
Schönherr J, Lendzian K (1981) A simple and inexpensive method of measuring water permeability of isolated plant cuticular membranes. Z Pflanzenphysiol 102:321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-328X(81)80203-6
Schreiber L (2001) Effect of temperature on cuticular transpiration of isolated cuticular membranes and leaf discs. J Exp Bot 52:1893–1900. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1893
Schreiber L (2010) Transport barriers made of cutin, suberin and associated waxes. Trends Plant Sci 15:546–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.004
Schreiber L, Riederer M (1996) Ecophysiology of cuticular transpiration: comparative investigation of cuticular water permeability of plant species from different habitats. Oecologia 107:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00333931
Schreiber L, Schönherr J (2009) Water and solute permeability of plant cuticles. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Schreiber L, Elshatshat S, Koch K, Lin J, Santrucek J (2006) AgCl precipitates in isolated cuticular membranes reduce rates of cuticular transpiration. Planta 223:283–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-005-0084-0
Schulte PJ, Hinckley TM (1987) The relationship between guard cell water potential and the aperture of stomata in Populus. Plant Cell Environ 10:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1987.tb01611.x
Shepherd T, Griffiths DW (2006) The effects of stress on plant cuticular waxes. New Phytol 171:469–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01826.x
Souch CA, Stephens W (1997) Growth, productivity and water use in three hybrids poplar clones. Tree Physiol 18:829–835. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.12.829
Stark RE, Tian S (2006) The cutin biopolymer matrix. In: Müller C, Riederer M (eds) Biology of the plant cuticle. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 126–144
Szuba A, Marczak Ł, Karliński L, Mucha J, Tomaszewski D (2019) Regulation of the leaf proteome by inoculation of Populus × canescens with two Paxillus involutus isolates differing in root colonization rates. Mycorrhiza 29:503–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00910-5
Taylor G (2002) Populus: Arabidopsis for Forestry. Do We Need a Model Tree? Ann Bot 90:681–689. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf255
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815. https://doi.org/10.1038/35048692
Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, Hellsten U, Putnam N, Ralph S, Rombauts S, Salamov A (2006) The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596–1604. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128691
van Loo M, Joseph JA, Heinze B, Fay MF, Lexer C (2008) Clonality and spatial genetic structure in Populus x canescens and its sympatric backcross parent P. alba in a Central European hybrid zone. New Phytol 177:506–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02266.x
Wang S, Jiang L (2007) Definition of superhydrophobic states. Adv Mater 19:3423–3424. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700934
Xu X, Xiao L, Feng J, Chen N, Chen Y, Song B, Xue K, Shi S, Zhou Y, Jenks MA (2016) Cuticle lipids on heteromorphic leaves of Populus euphratica Oliv. growing in riparian habitats differing in available soil moisture. Physiol Plant 158:318–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12471
Zeisler-Diehl V, Müller Y, Schreiber L (2018) Epicuticular wax on leaf cuticles does not establish the transpiration barrier, which is essentially formed by intracuticular wax. J Plant Physiol 227:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.03.018
Zhang Z, Chen Y, Zhang J, Ma X, Li Y, Li M, Wang D, Kang M, Wu H, Yang Y, Olson MS, Difazio SP, Wan D, Liu J, Ma T (2020) Improved genome assembly provides new insights into genome evolution in a desert poplar (Populus euphratica). Mol Ecol Resour 20:781–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13142
Zheng C, Qiu J, Jiang C, Yue N, Wang X, Wang W (2007) Comparison of stomatal characteristics and photosynthesis of polymorphic Populus euphratica leaves. Front Forest China 2:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11461-007-0014-3
Zhou HH, Chen YN, Li WH, Chen YP (2010) Photosynthesis of Populus euphratica in relation to groundwater depths and high temperature in arid environment, northwest China. Photosynthetica 48:257–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-010-0032-5
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Matthias Fladung from the Thünen-Institute in Großhansdorf and Jinxing Lin from the Beijing Forestry University for providing us with the clones investigated here. Further, we thank Yaron Malkowsky from the Nees Institute in Bonn for the technical assistance with scanning electron microscopy. Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation; SCHR17/1; Project number 391657309) is highly appreciated.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation; SCHR17/1; Project number 391657309).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Varone.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Grünhofer, P., Herzig, L. & Schreiber, L. Leaf morphology, wax composition, and residual (cuticular) transpiration of four poplar clones. Trees 36, 645–658 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02236-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02236-2