Abstract
Together with biliary drainage, which is an appropriate procedure for unresectable biliary cancer, biliary stent placement is used to improve symptoms associated with jaundice. Owing to investigations comparing percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), surgical drainage, and endoscopic drainage, many types of stents are now available that can be placed endoscopically. The stents used are classified roughly as plastic stents and metal stents. Compared with plastic stents, metal stents are of large diameter, and have long-term patency (although they are expensive). For this reason, the use of metal stents is preferred for patients who are expected to survive for more than 6 months, whereas for patients who are likely to survive for less than 6 months, the use of plastic stents is not considered to be improper. Obstruction in a metal stent is caused by a tumor that grows within the stent through the mesh interstices. To overcome such problems, a covered metal stent was developed, and these stents are now used in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. However, this type of stent has been reported to have several shortcomings, such as being associated with the development of acute cholecystitis and stent migration. In spite of these shortcomings, evidence is expected to demonstrate its superiority over other types of stent.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
More than 20 years have passed since stents began to be used for treating unresectable bile duct stricture in patients with obstructive jaundice. Previously, percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD); also known as percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was employed for patients with this disease, and the patients were often forced to stay in hospital for a long period of time with an external biliary fistula. The creation of an internal fistula is now widely used because it is as useful as surgical bypass in improving not only quality of life (QOL) but also survival rates. Today, noninvasive endoscopic stent placement is being used for most patients with this disease as an alternative procedure to the percutaneous approach. Plastic stents (PS), which have been used until now, are economical, but their shortcoming is that they give rise to obstruction at an earlier stage, so several improvements have been made. On the other hand, metal stents (MS), in which the insertion of the stents is enabled with a slender delivery system and the stents expand to a large diameter by themselves, have conferred noticeably extended patency compared with PS. However, their shortcomings are that they are more expensive than PS and replacing them is difficult once they have been placed.
Here we pose clinical questions (CQs) regarding stenting for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary carcinoma, with responses in the form of recommendations (grades of the recommendations are defined in Table 1 1). Also, levels of evidence are given (in parentheses) for findings in reference citations (see definitions of levels in Table 2 1).
CQ 1 Is biliary drainage recommended for patients with unresectable disease?
Biliary drainage should be performed (recommendation B).
There are many studies reporting the approach route of drainage for unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction, methods of stenting, and the quality of stent materials. In view of this situation, it is thought that the relief of jaundice should be conducted as a matter of course. Also, the creation of an internal fistula, where possible, is recommended.
For the drainage route, there are reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)2,3 (level II) comparing endoscopic drainage, PTBD, and surgical drainage. The success rate for the creation of an internal fistula is reported to be 95%–100%4,5 (levels II, IV). According to these reports, endoscopic drainage is preferable to the other two methods. A metaanalysis showed that endoscopic drainage was associated with a lower risk of complications, but a higher risk of recurrent biliary obstruction than surgical drainage4 (level II). The percutaneous procedure is performed in patients in whom the endoscopic procedure has been unsuccessful.
Concerning the types of stent available, there are several RCTs suggesting the superiority of metal stents over plastic stents with respect to stent patency4–12 (level II).
For hepatic hilar bile duct stricture, placement of multiple stents has been reported to confer better drainage effects than those brought about by single-stent placement13 (level IV), although there are also prospective trials demonstrating that single stents are as effective as multiple stents14,15 (levels II, III). However, there are several questions as to hepatic hilar bile duct stricture, such as the presence of segments for which drainage is unable to be achieved and the clogging of stents, so stent placement in these patients is still controversial.
CQ 2 Which type of biliary stent is appropriate for unresectable cases?
Ametal stent is preferable in view of stent patency (recommendation C1).
Plastic stents with an outer diameter of 8–10 Fr are now in use (Fig. 1). These are easily clogged, so stents with a larger diameter have occasionally been employed in the past. However, due to the pain and technical difficulties accompanying the insertion of these stents, they have fallen into disuse. Improvements have been made in the quality of materials and the shape of stents, but no difference in patency rates has been observed16–19 (level II).
There are RCTs comparing plastic stents with metal stents in the palliative treatment of distal malignant biliary obstruction4–11 (level II). As for the median patency of stents, metal stents (3.6–9.1 months) are significantly superior to plastic stents (1.8–5.5 months), but no difference was found in median survival (Table 3).20 Although metal stents are expensive, their overall cost, including hospitalization expenses, is thought to be lower compared with that of plastic stents because of the reduced frequency of re-intervention.6,7 According to recent reports, the cost of plastic stents is low for the reasons that, in patients for whom prognosis is poor, long-term survival is not expected (patients with liver metastasis) and re-intervention is also unnecessary.8–10 In patients for whom long-term survival exceeding 6 months is expected, metal stents may be used from the initial intervention, while in patients for whom survival exceeding 6 months is not expected, similar results are achieved by using plastic stents (level IV).
In metal stents, which are made of mesh materials, obstruction due to the ingrowth of tumors has often occurred. To cope with this problem, polyurethane-covered metal stents have become available in clinical settings (Fig. 2)21 (level IV), and their superior patency has been demonstrated by an RCT22 (level II). Recent case series studies, however, reported that no significant difference in patency rate was found between covered and uncovered metal stents, because covered metal stents have several drawbacks, such as stent-migration and the occurrence of acute cholecystitis23–25 (level IV). Furthermore patients with pancreatic cancer have been included in the results of studies of stent treatment for malignant distal biliary stricture. Accumulation of evidence is awaited.
There is much controversy as to the importance of establishing drainage of both liver lobes in malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Drainage with a unilateral uncovered metal stent is reported to be effective for hilar biliary obstruction15,26,27 (level III, IV); however, there are no RCTs regarding unilateral or bilateral metal stent drainage. Concerning plastic stents, an RCT failed to find any difference in drainage effects between single stents and multiple stents15 (level II). Although an RCT12 (level II) regarding plastic stents and metal stents showed that both success and patency rates were better for metal stents than for plastic stents, the RCT included only 20 patients with hilar biliary obstruction. Hence, it is still controversial which type of stents should be used in patients with hilar biliary obstruction.
References
Takada T, Miyazaki M, Miyakawa S, Tsukada K, Nagino M, Kondo S, et al. Purpose, use, and preparation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008;15:2–6.
Speer AG, Cotton PB, Russell RC, Mason RR, Hatfield AR, Leung JW, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic versus percutaneous stent insertion in malignant obstructive jaundice. Lancet 1987;2:57–62.
Smith AC, Dowsett JF, Russell RC, Hatfield AR, Cotton PB. Randomised trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgical bypass in malignant low bile duct obstruction. Lancet 1994;344:1655–60.
Moss AC, Morris E, Leyden J, MacMathuna P. Malignant distal biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic and surgical bypass results. Cancer Treat Rev 2007; 33:213–21.
Madoff DC, Wallace MJ. Palliative treatment of unresectable bile duct cancer: which stent? Which approach? Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002;11:923–39.
Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomized trial of self-expandanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet 1992;340:1486–92.
Knyrim K, Wagner HJ, Pausch J, Vakil N. A prospective randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 1993;25:207–12.
Prat F, Chapat O, Ducot B, Ponchon T, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, et al. A randomized trial of endoscopic drainage methods for inoperable malignant strictures of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:1–7.
Kaassis M, Boyer J, Dumas R, Ponchon T, Coumaros D, Delcenserie R, et al. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:178–82.
Katsinelos P, Paikos D, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, Paroutoglou G, Moschos I, et al. Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1587–93.
Soderlund C, Linder S. Covered metal versus plastic stents for malignant common bile duct stenosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:986–95.
Wagner HJ, Knyrim K, Vakil N, Klose KJ. Plastic endoprostheses versus metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. A prospective and randomized trial. Endoscopy 1993;25:213–6.
Chang WH, Kortan P, Haber GB. Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:354–62.
De Palma GD, Galloro G, Siciliano S, Iovino P, Catanzano C. Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic hepatic duct drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:547–53.
De Palma GD, Pezzullo A, Rega M, Persico M, Patrone F, Mastantuono L, et al. Unilateral placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar obstruction: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:50–3.
Schilling D, Rink G, Arnold JC, Benz C, Adamek HE, Jakobs R, et al. Prospective randomized single-center trial comparing three different 10-F plastic stents in malignant mid and distal bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:54–8.
Terruzzi V, Comin U, De Grazia F, Toti GL, Zambelli A, Beretta S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Tannenbaum Teflon and standard polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary stenosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:23–7.
Barkun AN. A prospective randomised multicentre trial comparing 10F Teflon Tannenbaum stents with 10F polyethylene Cotton-Leung stents in patients with malignant common duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:399–401.
van Berkel A-M, Huibregtse IL, Bergman JJGHM, Rauws EAJ, Bruno MJ, Huibregtse K. A prospective randomized trial of Tannenbaum-type Teflon-coated stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:213–7.
Levy MJ, Baron TH, Gostout CJ, Petersen BT, Farnell MB. Palliation of malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction with plastic versus expandable metal stents: an evidence-based approach. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:273–85.
Hausegger KA, Thurnher S, Bodendorfer G, Zollikofer CL, Uggowitzer M, Kugler C, et al. Treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with polyurethane-covered Wallstents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:403–8.
Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T, Sasahira N, Hirano K, Toda N, et al. A prospective randomised study of “covered” versus “uncovered” diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gut 2004;53:729–34.
Park DH, Kim M-H, Choi JS, Lee SS, Seo DW, Kim JH, et al. Covered versus uncovered Wallstent for malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction: a cohort comparative analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:790–6.
Yoon WJ, Lee JK, Lee KH, Lee WJ, Ryu JK, Kim Y-T, et al. A comparison of covered and uncovered Wallstents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:996–1000.
Fumex F, Coumaros D, Napoleon B, Barthet M, Laugier R, Yzet T, et al. Similar performance but higher cholecystitis rate with covered biliary stents: results from a prospective multicenter evaluation. Endoscopy 2006;38:787–92.
Cheng JLS, Bruno MJ, Bergman JJ, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic palliation of patients with biliary obstruction caused by nonresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: efficacy of self-expandable metallic Wallstents. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:33–9.
Freeman ML, Overby C. Selective MRCP and CT-targeted drainage of malignant hilar biliary obstruction with self-expanding metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:41–9.
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our deep gratitude to the members of the the Japanese Association of Biliary Surgery, the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, and the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology, who provided us with great support and guidance in the preparation of the Guidelines. This process was conducted as part of the Integrated Research Project for Assessing Medical Technology 2005 and 2006 sponsored by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare.
We truly appreciate the following active working members who developed the draft of the evidence-based clinical practice Guidelines for the treatment of biliary tract cancer (Japanese version, 2007): Masahiro Kai (Miyazaki), Yasutoshi Kimura (Sapporo), Shigeaki Sawada (Toyama), Hiroaki Shimizu (Chiba), Hisatoshi Nakagawara (Kanazawa), Kohei Nakachi (Kashiwa), and Hiroyuki Yoshitome (Chiba). We also appreciate very much the following members who reviewed and approved the final Japanese version of the guidelines: Hiromitsu Saisyo (Ichikawa), Munemasa Ryu (Chiba), Satoru Shikata (Kyoto), and Yuji Nimura (Nagoya).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Tsuyuguchi, T., Takada, T., Miyazaki, M. et al. Stenting and interventional radiology for obstructive jaundice in patients with unresectable biliary tract carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 15, 69–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1282-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-007-1282-x