Abstract
Purpose
Treatment of secondary knee osteoarthritis with a significant extra-articular deformity can be challenging. In such cases, an osteotomy or a custom-made hinged knee arthroplasy (CMH) are treatment options. However, there are limited data on the outcomes of using CMHs. Thus, the aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical results and subjective outcomes of CMHs.
Methods
We reviewed 9 CMHs (Endo-Model, LINK) in 7 patients with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Upon the last follow-up, we evaluated MA, stability and range of movement (ROM). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was used to evaluate patient-reported outcomes.
Results
The average age upon surgery was 61 years (48–76 years), and the follow-up period was 66 months. There were no early complications. Two CMHs were revised, one due to aseptic loosening and one due to late-onset haematogenic infection. Pre-operatively, MA varied from 18° (average 11°) valgus-deformity to 30° (average 17°) varus-deformity. Post-operatively, 7/9 (78%) of patients achieved better MA. Upon follow-up, the average OKS was 41/48, and ROM was 113°.
Conclusions
Patients treated with CMHs achieved good clinical and patient-reported outcomes. There were no early reoperations, and revision rate was relatively low. Overall, CMH could be considered for low-demand patients with increased operative risks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Extra-articular deformity of the lower limb can be the result of a fracture malunion, a metabolic disorder, or a congenital abnormality. Extra-articular deformities may be located in the tibial or femoral diaphysis or metaphysis. Deformities can lead to abnormal mechanical alignment (MA) of the lower limb, which, in turn, may increase the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) [1]. When planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA), deformities should be taken into consideration to ensure better end results [2].
A deformity near the knee joint (e.g. metaphyseal deformity) has higher effect on the overall mechanical alignment compared to similar deformity further from the knee joint (e.g. diaphyseal deformity). The alignment can be corrected by performing TKA with maximal intra-articular resections or by performing simultaneous osteotomy [3]. Wang and Wang presented that maximal intra-articular resections produce a viable outcome if the proposed femoral resections are not more proximal than the collateral insertions, and the line from the centre of the talus and distal shaft of the tibia bypasses the tibial plateau [4]. New technologies, such as computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation, might be helpful when performing maximal resections in contexts of extra-articular deformity [5,6,7].
In cases in which intra-articular resections are not sufficient, an osteotomy and TKA should be considered [3]. Several studies have reported good outcomes from simultaneous osteotomy and TKA, but also high risks of complications, such as perioperative fractures, non-unions and infections [8,9,10,11,12,13]. In some cases, in which constrained TKA is needed, deformities might inhibit standard stems from fitting in the deformed femur or tibia. In such cases, CMH might be used, but there is currently a lack of evidence supporting this technique [14, 15].
The aim of this retrospective multi-centre case series was to assess the mid-term clinical results and subjective outcomes of CMHs (Endo-Model, LINK, Hamburg, Germany) used in patients with secondary osteoarthritis and associated deformity of the lower limb. CMH is technically easy to perform; it also allows immediate full weight bearing and features no risk of non-unions. However, there have been problems with hinge mechanism over time such as high rates of aseptic loosening. Thus, we hypothesized that, in high-risk patients or in cases in which standard stems do not fit in the femur or tibia, CMH could produce decent outcomes with a reduced risk of complications.
Materials and methods
Patients and outcomes
Since 2003, fourteen CMHs (Endo-Model, Link, Hamburg) have been implanted in Finland for secondary knee OA in difficultly deformed bony anatomy. We excluded five CMHs from our study, as they were used in revision surgery. Thus, nine CMHs used in seven patients, with a minimum of 2-year follow-up, were included. Two out of seven patients had undergone bilateral CMH operations. The operations were performed in four hospitals. Prophylactic antibiotic (kefuroxime or clindamycin) was used just before the operation. Post-operatively full weight bearing and free mobilization were allowed.
We recorded patients’ previous medical history for demographic data and assessed their radiographs. We contacted patients via telephone, and they were invited for a follow-up visit. At this follow-up visit, we examined the stability and range of movement (ROM) of the knee, and patients were asked to complete the Oxford Knee Score (OKS, maximum is 48 points) questionnaire for the affected knee. Two authors (T.N. and M.M) evaluated and measured their pre- and post-operative MA from anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs, and radiolucent lines from native knee radiographs. Any complication or revision was noted.
Custom-made hinged total knee arthroplasties
All CMHs were customized Endo-Model (LINK, Hamburg), which is a third-generation hinged TKA [16]. In the normal Endo-Model, the femoral component has 6° of valgus. Implants were cobalt–chromium–molybdenum alloy, and the tibial plateaus were UHMW polyethylene. The CMH implants were customized based on pre-operative native X-rays and computed tomography. The stem offset, angles and curves were customized so that the stems would fit well in the deformed femur and tibia. The other aim was to correct the MA better than it was in the anatomical extremity. The customization of each case is shown in Table 1, and an example of the prosthesis template is shown in Fig. 1.
Data analysis
IBM SPSS Statistics (version 28.0.1) was used to carry out descriptive analyses. Pair sample t test was applied to calculate statistical differences between pre-operative and post-operative variables. The statistically significant threshold was accepted at p ≤ 0.05 (two-tailed).
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the ethical committee of Helsinki University Hospital. Informed consent was obtained for each patient in the study.
Results
Demographics
The average age of the patients undergoing the index operation was 61 years (48–76 years), and 5/7 (71%) were women. The causes of lower-limb deformity were previous trauma (n = 2), osteogenesis imperfecta (n = 2), hypophosphatemia (n = 2), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (n = 1), previous bone tuberculosis (n = 1) and an unknown skeletal disorder (n = 1). Two patients had undergone treatment with bilateral CMHs. The average follow-up time was 66 months (24–97 months). The average pre-operative Kellgren–Lawrence osteoarthritis classification was 3.4 (3–4).
The average pre-operative flexion was 103° (80°–135°). An extension deficit was present in three knees, and three knees went into hyperextension. Post-operatively, ROM varied from 70° to 135°, and the average ROM was 113°. Six out of nine (57%) of the knees achieved the same or better ROM post-operatively. One patient had 10° lack of extension.
At the last follow-up visit, the average OKS was 41. Moreover, two patients limped at this time: one clearly and one mildly. In one knee, there was slight movement in the coronal plane upon clinical assessment and radiolucent lines (maximum of 3.7 mm) around the femoral component. All other knees were stable in both the anteroposterior and coronal planes, and no signs of aseptic loosening were observed.
Mechanical alignment
Pre-operatively, MA varied from 18 (an average of 11) degrees of valgus-deformity to 30 (an average of 17) degrees varus-deformity. Post-operatively, mechanical alignment varied from 16 (an average of 7) degrees of valgus to 9 (an average of 4) degrees of varus. In seven (77%) cases, MA was closer to neutral post-operatively than pre-operatively. In two cases, valgus-deformity was higher post-operatively (from 12 to 15 and 8 to 9 degree of valgus).
Complications
After operation, no immediate complications occurred. Revision surgery was performed for 2/9 (22%) of the CMHs during the follow-up period. One patient had pain in the right knee and signs of aseptic loosening around the femur component. The femur component was exchanged 3 years after the primary operation. In the last follow-up, after 8 years from primary operation, there were signs of aseptic loosening around the same femur component, as mentioned above, but at this time did not require revision surgery. Another patient with previous bone tuberculosis had a haematogenic infection of the implant 4 years after the CMH operation. This infection was treated with antibiotics and debridement of the knee, and the liner was exchanged (DAIR). Meanwhile, neither tibial nor femoral bone components were exchanged.
Discussion
The overall mid-term subjective outcomes of CMH operations were encouraging. Patients exhibited relatively good ROM and stability with high patient-reported outcomes. CMH seems to be safe option for low-demand and high-risk patients, as there were no early complications. Otherwise, post-operative alignments were not as good as intended.
Several studies have evaluated the outcomes and survivorship of the Endo-Model hinged prosthesis [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Lombardi et al. demonstrated a survival of 85% in a series of 109 patients (113 TKAs), with a mean 25-month follow-up period [20]. Sanguineti et al. evaluated 20 knees for a mean duration of 42 months and reported a survival of 95% [22]. As with other hinged implants, the most commonly reported complications have been aseptic loosening and deep infection—as like in our series [19, 22]. There are only a few published studies related to the use of a CMH in patients with lower-limb deformity or neuromuscular dysfunction [14, 23]. In these studies, the prothesis used was the Stanmore Modular Individualized Lower Extremity System prosthesis. Sewell et al. reported good relief of pain and functional outcomes in 11 patients with skeletal dysplasia treated with CMH [14]. There was one (9%) aseptic loosening of the femur component and three other (one patella fracture, one tibia fracture, and one patella impingement) complications during an average seven-year follow-up time. Compared to Sewell’s study, in our series, the complication rate was somewhat lower (Table 2).
Previous studies have also reported good outcomes when correcting for extra-articular deformity with intra-articular resections or simultaneous osteotomy. However, intra-articular resections are not always sufficient and radical resections may lead to difficulties in balancing without constrained implant, and simultaneous osteotomy should be considered when performing TKA [3, 4, 8,9,10,11, 13]. Since simultaneous osteotomy is jeopardized by high rates of complications and the fact that standard stems may not always fit in a deformed tibia or femur, our aim was to identify a solution for this rare patient group using CMHs, even though we were aware of the complications of using fully-constrained implant as mentioned above.
In our study, no immediate complications occurred with the CMH. In previous studies (Table 3), which have evaluated patients with simultaneous osteotomy and TKA, the incidence of delayed union or non-union has been up to 15% [11,12,13, 24]. Moreover, rates of infection, periprosthetic fractures, thromboembolic complications, and stiffness have been even higher [8,9,10,11, 13]. The CMH operation is relatively easy to perform, and patients can achieve full weight bearing immediately, which may decrease thromboembolic complications [25]. In this study, we did not have a control group, but interestingly, one patient with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis had had osteotomies of both the femur and tibia, a simultaneous conventional hinged TKA in the right knee. Pre- and post-operative radiographs are shown in Fig. 2. A few years later, a CMH was implanted in her left knee. This patient reported that recovery was much easier on the left side, and her sick leave duration was two-third shorter after the CMH operation when compared to those related to her earlier osteotomies and TKA procedure on the right leg. Furthermore, customization enables using a hinged prothesis despite the presence of a deformity that prevents standard stems fitting femur or tibia.
Compared to osteotomy and TKA, the CMH seemed to exhibit poorer MA post-operatively [8, 9, 11, 12, 24]. In the present study neutral (0 ± 5 degrees), MA was achieved in 4/9 cases. Two authors (T.N. and M.M.) evaluated the radiographs, and in the cases where neutral MA was not achieved, technical prothesis implantation error was not found. It was thought that easily when planning the CMH the attention has probably been on fitting of the stems in curved bones. The pre-operative planning by surgeons and manufacturer had not taken enough into account the deformities and pre-operative MA—tibial and/or femoral valgus-angles of the stems were not sufficient to fully correct the deformity of the whole leg as shown in Fig. 3. For example, one patient (case #1) with post-operative 16° of valgus had aseptic loosening, and in this case, femoral and tibial stems were bent to fit the bones, but the angle of the stems was not sufficient to fully correct the MA. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the pre-operative planning process.
Even though there were problems with the post-operative MA and relatively high rate of aseptic loosening, we think that CMHs could be considered as an option for high-risk and low-demand patients with a severe extra-articular deformity and a secondary osteoarthritis. But due to relatively high risk of aseptic loosening, it should not be the first-line option for young and active patients. Our proposed treatment algorithm is in Fig. 4.
We are aware that our study has several limitations. Specifically, the retrospective study design has inherent limitations, and, due to the nature of the study, there was no control group. Patients were also a heterogenic group in terms of previous surgical procedures, deformity, and diseases. And since the rarity of these extreme deformities, the sample size is limited. We did not register use of tourniquet, blood loss or duration. Results are also valid only for this implant. Nevertheless, our study provides valuable novel information on the planning and use of the CMH in the treatment of these very rare and complex clinical scenarios, for which a prospective study is not feasible (Fig. 5).
Conclusions
In our study, patients with extremely deformed lower limb achieved good clinical and patient-reported outcomes. There were no early reoperations. Overall, CMH could be considered especially for low-demand patients with an increased operative risk.
References
Sharma L, Song J, Felson DT, Cahue S, Shamiyeh E, Dunlop DD (2001) The role of knee alignment in disease progression and functional decline in knee osteoarthritis. JAMA 286(2):188–195. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.2.188
Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE (2009) Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: Just how important is it? J Arthroplasty 24(6 Suppl):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034
Sculco PK, Kahlenberg CA, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2019) Management of extra-articular deformity in the setting of total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(18):e819–e830. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00361
Wang JW, Wang CJ (2002) Total knee arthroplasty for arthritis of the knee with extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1769–1774
Catani F, Digennaro V, Ensini A, Leardini A, Giannini S (2012) Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty in knees with osteoarthritis due to extra-articular deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(3):546–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1602-1
Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calo M, Bistolfi A, Castoldi F (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med 4(7):126. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.03.33
Mullaji A, Marawar S, Sharma A (2007) Correcting varus deformity. J Arthroplasty 22:15–19
Catonne Y, Khiami F, Sariali E, Ettori MA, Delattre O, Tillie B (2019) Same-stage total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy for osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity part II: femoral osteotomy, prospective study of 6 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(6):1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.009
Catonne Y, Sariali E, Khiami F, Rouvillain JL, Wajsfisz A, Pascal-Moussellard H (2019) Same-stage total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy for osteoarthritis with extra-articular deformity part I: tibial osteotomy, prospective study of 26 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(6):1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.010
Demir B, Ozkul B, Saygili MS, Cetinkaya E, Akbulut D (2018) Deformity correction with total knee arthroplasty for severe knee osteoarthritis accompanying extra-articular femoral deformity: the results are promising. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26(11):3444–3451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4920-8
Lonner J, Siliski J, Lotke P (2000) Simultaneous femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of osteoarthritis associated with severe extra-articular deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82(3):342–348. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200003000-00005
Madelaine A, Villa V, Yela C et al (2014) Results and complications of single-stage total knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 38(10):2091–2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2420-0
Veltman E, van Wensen R, Defoort K, van Hellemondt G, Wymenga A (2017) Single-stage total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy as treatment of secondary osteoarthritis with severe coronal deviation of joint surface due to extra-articular deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(9):2835–2840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3889-9
Sewell MD, Hanna SA, Al-Khateeb H et al (2012) Custom rotating-hinge primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with skeletal dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(3):339–343. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.27892
Kim RH, Scuderi GR, Dennis DA, Nakano SW (2011) Technical challenges of total knee arthroplasty in skeletal dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1516-0
Madanat R, Schroder S, Freiberg A (2018) Hinge implants. In: Bono J, Scott R (eds) Revision total knee arthroplasty, 2nd edn. Springer, Cham, pp 315–340
Gudnason A, Milbrink J, Hailer NP (2011) Implant survival and outcome after rotating-hinge total knee revision arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(11):1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1330-5
Guenoun B, Latargez L, Freslon M, Defossez G, Salas N, Gayet LE (2009) Complications following rotating hinge endo-modell (link) knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(7):529–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2009.07.013
Joshi N, Navarro-Quilis A (2008) Is there a place for rotating-hinge arthroplasty in knee revision surgery for aseptic loosening? J Arthroplasty 23(8):1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.016
Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Eberle RW, Adams JB (1997) Rotating hinge prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and results. Surg Technol Int 6:379–382
Petrou G, Petrou H, Tilkeridis C et al (2004) Medium-term results with a primary cemented rotating-hinge total knee replacement: a 7- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(6):813–817. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14708
Sanguineti F, Mangano T, Formica M, Franchin F (2014) Total knee arthroplasty with rotating-hinge endo-model prosthesis: clinical results in complex primary and revision surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(11):1601–1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2061-1
Sewell M, Al-Hadithy N, Hanna S et al (2012) Custom rotating-hinge total knee replacement in patients with spina bifida and severe neuromuscular dysfunction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(9):1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1539-y
Radke S, Radke J (2002) Total knee arthroplasty in combination with a one-stage tibial osteotomy: A technique for correction of a gonarthrosis with a severe (>15 degrees) tibial extra-articular deformity. J Arthroplasty 17(5):533–537. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.33269
Pearse EO, Caldwell BF, Lockwood RJ, Hollard J (2007) Early mobilisation after conventional knee replacement may reduce the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(3):316–322. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18196
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Seija Torssonen, Ville Sumuvuori and Tuukka Niinimäki for their help in identifying patients and their help with the study.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital. This work was supported by Orton Evo-grants (Project number: A2500/471) by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland and Pär Slätis grants from Invalidisäätiö, Helsinki, Finland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nuutinen, T.K., Madanat, R., Både, K.W. et al. Custom-made hinged total knee arthroplasties in the context of extra-articular deformity: a case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 1411–1420 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03299-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03299-8