Abstract
Mathematics teachers’ beliefs are central to mathematics teaching and student learning. Because different aspects of motivation and affect—particularly enjoyment—primarily develop within the classroom context, examining how different teachers’ beliefs may affect student outcomes in mathematics is imperative. The current study examines teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics in connection to students’ motivation (i.e. intrinsic value, utility value and perceived competence) and enjoyment of mathematics across different settings by considering students’ mathematics achievement, gender and classroom composition (i.e. socioeconomic and behavioural). Data were collected from 3rd- and 4th-grade mathematics teachers (N = 686) and their students (N = 11,782) in six countries (i.e. Norway, Finland, Sweden, Portugal, Estonia and Serbia). A two-level structural equation modelling technique (TSEM) (i.e. student level and classroom level) with random slopes was employed to address our research questions. The results indicate that students’ intrinsic value and perceived competence positively relate to their enjoyment of mathematics in all six countries. Teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics moderate the within-classroom relationship between boys and girls and the motivation and enjoyment of learning mathematics in Portugal and Norway. Unlike boys, girls consistently perceive themselves as less competent in mastering mathematics, even in primary school. Classroom socioeconomic composition had a more pronounced influence on teachers’ beliefs in Sweden, Norway and Serbia. In relation to teachers’ beliefs, classroom behavioural composition was relevant in Estonia and Sweden. In Finland and Norway, classroom composition was essential to boys’ and girls’ differential motivation and enjoyment of mathematics learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The research on mathematics teacher competence assumes that teachers’ beliefs are an integral part of their dispositions and have an orienting and action-guiding function when acting in the classroom (Felbrich et al., 2012; Lauermann & ten Hagen, 2021; Schmotz et al., 2010; Schoenfeld, 1998; Thompson, 1992). Corresponding empirical evidence suggests that beliefs affect teachers’ practices and are positively related to instructional quality and students’ learning outcomes (Daumiller et al., 2021; Hettinger et al., 2023; Heyder et al., 2020, 2020; Stipek et al., 2001), favouring student-centred and constructivist beliefs (Dubberke et al., 2008; Kleickmann et al., 2016; Staub & Stern, 2002; Voss et al., 2013). The latter are related to educational approaches and philosophies that emphasise the active role of students in their learning process and place the needs, interests and abilities of students at the core of their learning experience. Constructivist teaching approaches encourage students to ask questions, explore topics and engage in hands-on experiences to construct knowledge and discover answers. Early findings suggest that student-centred mathematics instruction may positively impact student learning outcomes more than teacher-centred pedagogies and respective beliefs (Fennema et al., 1996). However, because student interest and engagement and their specific learning needs might be influenced by teacher beliefs, the affective and conative aspects of student outcomes, such as students’ motivation and enjoyment, are of particular interest as dependent variables, in addition to their mathematical achievement (Radišić, 2023). Furthermore, studies on students’ perceptions of the classroom setting and teachers’ expectations and beliefs show differential effects for girls and boys; for example, boys feel that they can profit more from collaborative work than girls (Samuelsson & Samuelsson, 2016), while girls perceive lower teacher expectations but higher mathematics prestige beliefs from teachers than boys (Lazarides & Watt, 2015). Thus, there might be differential effects of teachers’ beliefs on student motivation and enjoyment concerning students’ gender.
However, although direct links between teachers’ beliefs and diverse student outcomes have been thoroughly studied, our understanding of this relationship is still inconclusive (Lauermann & ten Hagen, 2021; Polly et al., 2013). Moreover, researchers who study teachers’ beliefs have been criticised for lacking research with younger participants (Burr & Hofer, 2002). At the same time, it has been argued that, to improve our understanding of the nature of teachers’ beliefs and their impact, research examining how such beliefs affect other aspects relevant to learning, such as motivation and enjoyment, is greatly needed (Daumiller et al., 2021; Heyder et al., 2020; Muis, 2004; Muis et al., 2006).
In the current study, we examined the relationship between teachers’ beliefs on the nature and learning of mathematics and primary students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics across six countries, differentiating the analysis for boys and girls and considering students’ achievement and classroom socioeconomic and behaviour composition. Focusing on primary students, we aim to shed light on a population that is infrequently examined in similar studies (Heyder et al., 2020) while observing different teacher beliefs. A nested data structure across six education systems was considered (Lauermann & Berger, 2021), coupled with students’ mathematics achievement and classroom composition (Yang Hansen et al., 2020; Marsh et al., 2012).
Theoretical background
Motivation and enjoyment of mathematics
Mathematics competence is a vital life skill that supports students’ participation in society today (Heyder et al., 2020; OECD, 2018), yet maintaining productive involvement in mathematics is a systematic challenge (Middleton et al., 2023). Building on Eccles and colleagues’ expectancy-value framework (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020), numerous studies have demonstrated a significant link between students’ expectancies of success (i.e. how well one expects to do on an upcoming task, from now on perceived competence) and task values (e.g. intrinsic value, interest and joy of involvement with the task and utility value, perceived usefulness of the task) to the continuous involvement with mathematics tasks (Wigfield & Eccles, 2020) and later career choices (e.g. Wang, 2012; Watt et al., 2012). Furthermore, relying on the control-value theory (Pekrun, 2017), among the achievement emotions, the enjoyment of mathematics is particularly linked to the intrinsic component (Putwain et al., 2018). Although the latter amplifies the direct positive relationships between perceived control and mathematics achievement, the former promotes this relationship (Putwain et al., 2021). In a similar study, Forsblom et al. (2022) show that students’ perceived competence and values predict subsequent enjoyment when controlled for prior achievement and gender. Chen et al. (2023) provide similar results by observing achievement, enjoyment and perceived competence in mathematics.
Because of the content specificity of motivation and increasing importance of social and emotional learning goals (Radišić, 2023; Putwain et al., 2018), investigating students’ emotions and motivation is crucial for understanding students’ learning of mathematics (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020; Hannula et al., 2019; Schukajlow et al., 2023). Mathematics education research assumes that students’ enjoyment of mathematics is closely related to students’ personal (and often situational) interest and that emotional and motivational constructs can vary in their temporal stability, depending on the object to which they are linked, such as specific mathematical activities or specific tasks that teachers use in the classroom (Schukajlow et al., 2017; Schukajlow & Rakoczy, 2016). For example, in a German study on modelling problems, Schukajlow et al. (2012) show that operative-strategic teaching practices closely related to student-centred approaches led to higher enjoyment among students when compared with traditional directive approaches.Footnote 1
Many studies have also confirmed differences between boys and girls in motivation, particularly related to intrinsic value and perceived competence (Rodríguez et al., 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020), indicating that boys typically exhibit more favourable motivational characteristics in mathematics than girls. Because girls are reported as expressing lower levels of individual interest and perceived competence in mathematics, the impact of intrinsic value on mathematics achievement is even more crucial for girls than boys (Ganley & Lubienski, 2016). Consistent with this, the research on academic emotions in mathematics suggests the existence of more negative feelings and attitudes in girls than boys (Goetz et al., 2013; Hyde et al., 1990) and that positive emotions associated with mathematics (like enjoyment) could have a more pronounced effect on girls’ dedication (Pinxten et al., 2014).
Mathematics teachers’ beliefs
Despite intensive research on teachers’ beliefs, no precise and selective definition of the concept can be discerned so far (Leder, 2019; Törner, 2002). Philipp (2007) defines beliefs as ‘the lenses through which one looks when interpreting the world’ (p. 258). Richardson (1996) proposes a broader, domain-unspecific definition of beliefs as ‘psychologically held understandings, premises or propositions about the world that are felt to be true’ (p. 103). This definition encompasses a teacher’s epistemological stance towards an object, which includes affective attitudes and the readiness to act (cf. Grigutsch et al., 1998) and depends on the degree of individual agreement (Beswick, 2005, 2007). Despite the term’s ambiguity, educational research in mathematics has a broad consensus on differentiating profession-related beliefs (Ernest, 1989). Beliefs are assumed to be domain specific (Törner, 2002) or even situation specific (Kuntze, 2011; Schoenfeld, 2010).
Domain-specific ability beliefs link to the extent to which success in a given domain, like mathematics, is attributed to the innate ability one is not taught in school (Leslie et al., 2015) and can be situated with the broader idea of layperson theories regarding whether the ability is fixed or malleable (Dweck, 2006). Often, mathematics is recognised as a domain in which innate ability is strongly linked to success in the field (Heyder et al., 2020; Leslie et al., 2015). Regarding beliefs about the nature of mathematics, Grigutsch et al. (1998) suggest that static views about the nature of mathematics may emphasise the formal aspect of mathematics (formalism aspect) or an orientation towards procedures and calculation schemes (schema orientation). On the other hand, dynamic views tend to emphasise mathematics’ application aspect and its processual character (Grigutsch et al., 1998).
Beliefs about learning mathematics (Handal, 2003; Kuntze, 2011; Staub & Stern, 2002) represent another significant dimension of beliefs. Transmission-oriented beliefs, which view students as passive recipients of knowledge, are often distinguished from constructivist-influenced beliefs that endorse the principles of constructive learning. The latter emphasises that the teacher’s role is to facilitate students’ knowledge construction while students take a more active role in the learning process (Blömeke & Kaiser, 2014; Staub & Stern, 2002; Thompson, 1992). Later studies recognise that some teachers adopt a mixed view and convey elements of both constructivist and transmissive views (Yang et al., 2020).
Teacher beliefs and their relation to classroom practice and students’ outcomes
Given that the different motivational and emotional characteristics related to mathematics are widely developed within the classroom setting and, thus, shaped by the immediate learning environment (Eccles & Roeser, 2009, 2011; Eccles & Wigfield, 2020; Putwain et al., 2018), it is important to examine how and through which processes teachers’ beliefs in mathematics classrooms can enhance students’ mathematics interest, enjoyment and engagement with mathematics (Hettinger et al., 2023). Even though the impact of teacher beliefs on student learning is still uncertain, most researchers agree that dynamic beliefs about the nature of mathematics and constructivist learning beliefs are more strongly related to an emphasis on processual, iterative mathematics in instructional settings (Reusser et al., 2011). Staub and Stern (2002) show that teachers with constructivist beliefs were associated with greater student achievement gains in mathematical word problems. At the same time, teachers’ ability expectations have been seen as relevant predictors of students’ perceived competence, even with elementary school students (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013; Roeser et al., 1993; Wang, 2012). For example, a German study with fourth graders (Heyder et al., 2020) shows the differential effects of teacher beliefs on high- and low-achieving students; the study indicates that the more teachers believed that mathematics requires innate ability, the lower the intrinsic motivation of their low-achieving students was. These results suggest that teachers’ beliefs that success in mathematics depends on innate ability may be an obstacle to creating a classroom atmosphere that fosters student motivation and enjoyment of learning and engagement. At the same time, classroom composition (e.g. the proportion of economically disadvantaged students) can have a differential effect on how teachers decide to promote learning and engagement in their classrooms (Yang Hansen et al., 2020; Marsh et al., 2012).
Teacher beliefs and gender differences
The expectancy-value framework has touched on gender role stereotypes and how these shape socialisers’ beliefs (Eccles et al., 1993; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020), including success expectancies and task values of boys and girls. Early studies by Fennema (1990) and Fennema et al. (1990) have identified gender differences in the teacher expectations of male and female students, resulting in teachers overestimating boys’ mathematical abilities and underestimating girls’ abilities. Teachers tended to attribute boys’ successes to higher effort, competitiveness, independence and enjoyment of mathematics. A later study by Tiedemann (2000) supports these findings, while Dickhauser and Meyer (2006) confirm this pattern, even when girls’ achievements were equal to those of boys. However, when such relationships concerning general teacher ability beliefs have been observed, the differences between boys and girls have not been confirmed (Wentzel et al., 2010). Observing tenth-grade students, Lazarides and Watt (2015) examine the effects of students’ perceived mathematics teachers’ beliefs (i.e. their teachers’ expectations about students’ ability and mathematics prestige), classroom goal orientations (i.e. mastery and performance approach) and their own mathematics motivational beliefs (i.e. perceived competence and task values) on girls’ and boys’ career intentions in mathematical fields. Their results reveal the links between teacher beliefs, learning environments, student motivations and mathematical career intentions, with girls perceiving lower teacher expectations than boys but higher teacher mathematics prestige beliefs. Teachers’ expectations and students’ motivations have been positively related to students’ reported prior mathematics achievement, with the latter being consistent with some earlier studies (e.g. Roeser et al., 1993).
In sum, mathematics is a demanding subject (Heyder et al., 2020), posing challenges to both students and teachers as early as primary school. The research strand focusing on teacher beliefs that is primarily related to ability beliefs and nature of mathematics observes mathematics as a domain in which innate ability is more prevalent (Leslie et al., 2015), thus hindering motivation (Heyder et al., 2020). Significant associations have been confirmed on numerous occasions between students’ perceived competence, task values and their grappling with mathematics, either as a later career choice (Watt et al., 2012; Wang, 2012) or in immediate school surroundings (Chen et al., 2023; Forsblom et al., 2022; Putwain et al., 2018), mostly favouring boys (Rodríguez et al., 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020). This may be because of the evident differences in teachers’ expectations towards boys and girls (e.g. Fennema, 1990; Lazarides & Watt, 2015; Wentzel et al., 2010) and the presence of more negative feelings and attitudes in girls related to mathematics (Goetz et al., 2013; Hyde et al., 1990). However, studies observing such patterns focus primarily on middle school students and older (Burr & Hofer, 2002; Heyder et al., 2020). If we consider that the foundation of successful mathematics learning during secondary school education is grounded on effective mathematics learning during earlier stages of schooling, like primary school (Clements & Samara, 2011; Heyder et al., 2020), then it is essential to explore how teachers’ beliefs shape motivational, emotional and achievement outcomes as early as possible.
Current study and research questions
Focusing on primary school, the current study aims to examine teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics in connection to students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics across different settings, here by considering students’ prior mathematics achievement (Lazarides & Watt, 2015; Roeser et al., 1993), gender and classroom composition (Marsh et al., 2012). Rich data from six education systems offer a more robust examination of relevant constructs and participants (Lauermann & Berger, 2021) to shed light on the following research questions:
-
(1)
What is the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics and students’ motivation, enjoyment and mathematics achievement when controlling for students’ gender and classroom composition (i.e. percentage of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged homes and percentage of students with behavioural problems)?
-
(2)
Are there gender differences in students’ motivational dimensions and enjoyment of mathematics, and do these gender gaps vary significantly across different classrooms?
-
(3)
Do teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics and classroom contexts predict the variation in the relationship between gender and motivational dimensions and the enjoyment of mathematics?
We expect significant variations in mathematical motivation and enjoyment between boys and girls within and across classrooms (Goetz et al., 2013; Hyde et al., 1990; Rodríguez et al., 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020), where boys display a more favourable motivational pattern concerning intrinsic value, utility value and perceived competence than girls. We also postulate that both teachers’ beliefs (Marsh et al., 2012) and gender differences regarding their task values (i.e. intrinsic and utility values) and expectancy of success (i.e. perceived competence) may be affected by classroom composition. Beliefs connecting mathematics to a set of procedures and rules are expected to dominate classrooms that have a higher percentage of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families. Moreover, it can be hypothesised that classrooms with a lower number of students with behavioural problems will generally exhibit higher mathematics achievement. In contrast, teachers will exhibit beliefs on the procedural nature of mathematics to a lesser extent, favouring those regarding mathematics as an inquiry process and observing learning closer to constructivist views (Lazarides & Watt, 2015). Finally, the views of the nature of mathematics as an inquiry process and of learning as an active process are assumed to benefit students’ perceived competence and intrinsic value (Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013; Heyder et al., 2020; Reusser et al., 2011; Wang, 2012).
Methods
Participants
The current study is part of an international longitudinal research focused on the development of mathematics motivation in primary education—Co-constructing Mathematics Motivation in Primary Education–A Longitudinal Study in Six European Countries (MATHMot for short)—funded by the Research Council of Norway (grant number 301033). Data were collected across six European countries (i.e. Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Serbia, Estonia and Finland) (Table 1). A sample in the first year of the MATHMot project consisted of 11,782 students (5700 in grade 3 and 6082 in grade 4) and 686 teachers from 287 schools. In each country, 45 to 52 schools participated in the study, sampling, in most cases, one grade 3 and one grade 4 in each school. All participating schools came from larger metropolitan areas or nearby surroundings (e.g. in Norway, schools in the greater Oslo area; in Serbia, schools in the greater area of Belgrade). School participation (i.e. students and teachers in the project) was voluntary.
At the student level, the sample was balanced for sex (50.6% girls), with a mean age of 9.57 (SD = 0.8333). Female teachers are dominant (89.5%) in our sample, reflecting the general gender distribution among the primary school teacher population. The mean age of sampled teachers is 45.34 (SD = 10.679) and with, on average, about 19 years of service as a mathematics or class teacher (M = 18.69, SD = 11.507). Over half (54.2%) hold at least a bachelor’s degree or equivalent.
All data were collected during regular mathematics lessons by trained research assistants, and informed consent was obtained from the students’ parents and teachers.
Variables
A student questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographic information, such as sex, language and socioeconomic background of the family. The Achievement Emotion Questionnaire–Elementary School (AEQ-ES; Lichtenfeld et al., 2012) and a mathematics test were also administered. The Expectancy Value Scale (EVS) captured different aspects of students’ motivation for mathematics (Peixoto et al., 2023).
The EVS (Peixoto et al., 2023) consists of five dimensions, and current analyses include three: intrinsic value (IV), utility value (UV) and perceived competence (PC). Each dimension comprises five items anchored on a 4-point Likert scale (‘never’ to ‘a lot of times’). Reliability across the dimensions was satisfactory (see Table 2 for details on reliability and example items). Metric invariance across grades and countries was established for each dimension (see Appendix Table 5 for more information).
The AEQ-ES (Lichtenfeld et al., 2012) was used to measure enjoyment. The enjoyment subscale consists of nine items concentrating on the enjoyment of attending mathematics class, doing homework and taking mathematics tests, here anchored on a 5-point Likert scale (‘not at all’ to ‘very much’). Reliability was satisfactory (see Table 2 for details on reliability and example items). Metric invariance across grades and countries was confirmed (see Appendix Table 5 for more information).
Mathematics achievement was measured with a test developed for each grade. The test comprised released items administered in grade 4 of the TIMSS 2011 cycle (Mullis et al., 2012). The test in grade 3 consisted of 12 mathematics problems and 14 in grade 4. Math problems selected for the test were chosen following multiple criteria: item topic (e.g. numbers, geometry, data display), item relative difficulty and curriculum analysis coverage (i.e. provided for each participating country). One point was assigned to each correct answer, resulting in a maximum score of 12 points for grade 3 and 14 for grade 4. The test was timed (i.e. 25 min in grade 3 and 30 min in grade 4). All items in the mathematics test were approved for use by the IEA (Approval IEA-22-022). Next, the test scores for grade 3 and grade 4 students were estimated using the Rasch measurement, here based on all items included in the tests. Because the tests involved seven mathematics problems used in both tests, this enabled us to create a joint mathematics achievement scale. The WLE person parameters were used in the analyses. The overall scale was anchored to an average score of 500 and standard deviation of 100.
Adapted from the Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M) (Laschke & Blömeke, 2014), information on teachers’ beliefs on the nature of mathematics and learning of mathematics was collected by a teacher questionnaire, which was consistent with the theoretical and empirical background (Grigutsch et al., 1998). Teachers’ beliefs on the nature of mathematics comprise two subscales—rules and procedures (RULES) and process of inquiry (INQUIRY)—each comprising six items anchored on a 4-point Likert scale (‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’). For the RULES subscale, the model fit had the following parameters: CFI = 0.983, TLI = 0.969, RMSEA = 0.071 and SRMR = 0.029. In the case of the INQUIRY subscale, the parcelling method was conducted (Little et al., 2002), and the model showed the following parameters: CFI = 1.000, TLI = 1.000, RMSEA = 0.000 and SRMR = 0.000. Reliability values are provided in Table 2, together with the example items. The invariance of the subscales was confirmed with the alignment method, showing equal loadings across countries.
Beliefs on the learning of mathematics were examined through the active learning scale (ACTIVE_L), comprising four items anchored on a 4-point Likert scale (‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’). The configural model for the ACTIVE_L scale was satisfactory (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.978, RMSEA = 0.091, SRMR = 0.015) coupled with scale reliability (see Table 2 for details on reliability and example items). Invariance was confirmed with the alignment method, showing equal loadings across countries.
In addition, teachers provided information about classroom composition, namely, the percentage of students coming from socioeconomically disadvantaged homes (CC_lowSES) and those with behavioural problems (CC_Beh). Please see Table 2 for more details.
Given the international aspect of the project, all instruments followed a two-step translation procedure—from English to one of the project languages, followed by back-translation to English. Concerning TIMSS 2011 items that were embedded in the math test, official translations were used for all countries except Estonia, which did not participate in TIMSS 2011. For Estonia, translation procedures applied to other instruments were utilised.
Analytical procedures
Measurement invariance was tested, and metric invariance (i.e. equal loadings across the countries) was established for all constructs across countries and grades (see Appendix Table 5 for an overview). A two-level (i.e. student level and classroom level) structural equation modelling (TSEM) with random slopes was employed to address our research questions. By estimating a so-called random slope, TSEM allows for the examination of relationships among constructs at the respective level and tests whether the lower-level relationship varies at the higher-level units. In our analysis, for example, the student-level relationship between sex and students’ motivation or enjoyment (i.e. slope) may vary across different classrooms (i.e. random). As in our second research question, this assumption can be tested using a two-level SEM model with random intercepts and slopes. To test this, we allowed the slope to vary and estimated the mean and variance of the individual-level slope. If the estimated variance of the individual-level slope was significant, we could confirm that the individual-level slope was random, implying that the individual-level relationship was significantly different because students belong to diverse classroom contexts. When predicting the variation of the random slopes (i.e. individual-level relationship), as in our research question 3, we introduce a cross-level interaction and regress the random slopes on teacher belief dimensions. A separate analysis was conducted for each of the six educational systems. We refer to the estimated random slopes as Slope_ Enjoy (i.e. SE in Fig. 1), Slope_ Intrinsic, Slope_ PC and Slope_Utility (i.e. SM in Fig. 1). All models were estimated using Mplus 8.8 (Muthén & Muthén, 1998–2017).
In the next step, we explained the variances of the random slopes by teacher beliefs in terms of cross-level interactions. Cross-level interactions may occur when the lower-level relationship differs depending on the value of the higher-level predictor. In the current analyses, for example, we examined whether the random slope (i.e. the relationship between student sex and their motivation dimensions or enjoyment) can be explained by classroom teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics (i.e. mathematics as a set of rules or as a process of inquiry and active learning), here by taking into account student mathematics achievement and classroom composition. The models also included the regression of classroom mathematics achievement on classroom composition (i.e. percentage of low SES students and percentage of students with behavioural problems). Figure 1 shows the hypothetical mixed effect model to be tested using data from six countries.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the relationship between sex and the conditional enjoyment and motivation dimensions (conditioned by students’ mathematics achievements) are assumed to vary across different classrooms. This means the random slopes of the relationships depicted by the black dots SM and SE. SM and SE are latent variables at the classroom level, and Mplus estimated the means (i.e., the strength of the relationship) and variances (i.e. the difference of the relationship across classrooms) of the random slopes. Teacher beliefs can predict the variation of the random slopes, in turn, by regressing random slope on teacher beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics. The arrows pointing to the dots SM and SE from teacher beliefs are the cross-level interactions reflecting the impact of the class-level construct on the individual-level relationships. In other words, the model demonstrates that teachers’ beliefs may moderate the relationships between sex and students’ conditional motivation and enjoyment by mathematics achievement and classroom composition.
Results
In this section, we depict the results connected to the research questions guiding the study. We focus on the mechanisms between teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics, mathematics achievement and the differences in students’ conditional motivation and enjoyment between boys and girls by classroom composition. The mechanism is depicted by path diagrams in Figs. 2, 3 and 4 for the respective countries. It should be noted that the TSEM models estimated here are saturated models with a perfect model fit. However, only the significant parameter estimates are included in the path diagrams.
Diverse mechanisms in different countries
Norway
All three dimensions of students’ motivation (i.e. IV, UV and PC) were significantly related to students’ enjoyment. The most substantial relationship was between intrinsic value and enjoyment (0.67). Boys generally perceived higher mathematical competence (0.17) and performed better on the mathematics tests (0.10) than girls. Classrooms’ socioeconomic composition was positively related to teachers’ beliefs in active mathematics learning (0.19).
Finland
Students’ intrinsic value, UV and PC were positively related to their enjoyment of mathematics. Boys performed better in mathematics scores (0.12) and reported higher enjoyment of learning mathematics (0.04) and PC in mathematics (0.14).
Sweden
The relationship between students’ enjoyment of mathematics and their intrinsic value (0.71) was higher than that with the other two motivation dimensions (i.e. UV, 0.08 and PC, 0.11). Moreover, boys were observed to have a higher level of mathematics achievement (0.13), enjoyment of learning mathematics (0.07) and PC in mathematics (0.09). Classroom socioeconomic composition was negatively related to teachers’ inquiry beliefs (−0.23) and active teaching in mathematics (−0.24). A moderate relationship was found between teachers’ beliefs about inquiry and classroom behavioural problems (0.31). In Swedish classrooms, teachers’ beliefs about rules were linked to higher class mathematics achievement (−0.34).
Serbia
Significant relationships were established between the three dimensions of students’ motivation and enjoyment for learning mathematics (i.e. 0.68 for intrinsic value, 0.07 for UV and 0.17 for PC in mathematics). A significant gender difference was also found in favour of boys in mathematics performance (0.12) and PC in mathematics (0.05). Furthermore, a negative relationship was observed between classrooms’ socioeconomic composition and teachers’ beliefs of mathematics being seen as a set of rules and procedures (−0.26).
Estonia
Significant gender differences in favour of boys were observed in the intrinsic value (0.10), PC dimensions (0.15) and mathematics achievement (0.13). The two dimensions of students’ mathematics learning motivation were also positively related to their enjoyment of mathematics, 0.72 and 0.40, respectively. Classroom behavioural problems were negatively associated with average mathematics achievement (−0.23) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics being a set of rules and procedures (−0.29).
Portugal
Positive relationships between students’ intrinsic value, PC and enjoyment of mathematics were observed. Boys held higher intrinsic value (0.10) and stronger PC (0.15) and achieved higher in mathematics (0.13).
Results across individual countries
Our findings indicate that boys consistently demonstrated significantly higher levels of mathematics achievement and perceived mathematics competence than girls. Additionally, we observed that students’ mathematics achievement mediated the gender difference in perceived mathematics competence. Moreover, mathematics achievement exhibited significant associations with all the motivational dimensions included in our model.
Furthermore, our study revealed a gender difference in intrinsic value in Norway, Estonia and Portugal, which was found to be mediated by mathematics achievement. We observed no associations for between-classroom SES composition, behaviour problems, teacher beliefs dimensions and classroom average mathematics achievement, except for Estonia. These results suggest that other factors, such as teacher classroom practices, may play a crucial role in the missing link between teacher beliefs and mathematics achievement at the classroom level.
Do gender differences in motivation and enjoyment of mathematics vary across classrooms?
The relationships between gender and mathematics motivation and enjoyment were allowed to vary across different classrooms to answer this research question. This meant that a mean and variance were estimated for these parameters, with the mean estimate indicating the individual-level relationship and variance the difference across classrooms for the observed relationship. A significant variance confirmed that the relationship differed over different classrooms (i.e. random slopes). Table 3 presents the estimates of the mean and variance of the relationships in all six countries.
As shown in Table 3, these estimates tended to be minor and, in most cases, nonsignificant. The between-classroom difference in the Sex_Intrinsic relationship was significant in five countries, except Finland. The difference in Sex_Enjoy relationships across classrooms was significant in four countries, except Estonia and Serbia. Norway and Sweden had considerable cross-classroom variance in the relationship between sex and utility. The significant slope variation indicates that gender differences in students’ motivation and enjoyment varied across classrooms. The relationship between sex and PC was positive and significant in all six countries, but only Portugal held a considerable variation in this relationship. This implies that, in all countries, girls perceived themselves to be less competent in mastering mathematics, regardless of their classroom, except in Portugal, where girls’ self-perception differed significantly in different classrooms.
Do teachers’ beliefs and classroom context explain the variation in gender differences in mathematics motivation and enjoyment?
Although significant variances in the countries’ slopes are shown in Table 3, we attempted to account for these variances in more depth in the follow-up analyses. Table 4 presents country-specific patterns of teachers’ beliefs explaining gender differences in motivation and enjoyment of mathematics. The models ascertained the significant explanatory role of teachers’ beliefs in the variation between boys and girls in mathematics motivation and enjoyment in Portugal, Norway and Finland. In Portugal, the negative estimate was from Slope_PC on teachers’ inquiry beliefs, indicating that teachers’ beliefs in inquiry reduced the sex differences in the perceived competence to learn mathematics. In Norway, teachers’ beliefs about active learning positively related to the Sex_Intrinsic and Sex_Utility slopes, implying that the gender differences in intrinsic and UVs can be increased in a classroom where the teacher holds stronger beliefs about active learning.
In Norway, teachers’ beliefs about active learning were significantly related to the gender difference in the intrinsic value of learning mathematics (0.09) and the UV (0.11). Additionally, the classroom socioeconomic context affected the relationship between gender and UV directly (0.09) and indirectly through teachers’ active learning (0.03). Classroom behavioural problems were found to be related to the gender difference in the intrinsic value of mathematical motivation (−0.18). In Finland, classroom socioeconomic composition reinforced the relationship between gender and enjoyment of learning mathematics (0.08).
Discussion
The major focus of the present study was on examining teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics in connection to students’ intrinsic value, utility value, perceived competence and enjoyment of mathematics. We have studied these patterns across different settings, simultaneously considering students’ mathematics achievement and classroom composition. Against the backdrop of previous research, our findings reveal a differentiated picture of country-specific mechanisms and more general patterns captured across all countries.
Observations from the student-level models indicate that students’ intrinsic value and perceived competence positively related to their enjoyment of mathematics in all six countries. This pattern has been reported elsewhere, and results show it is widespread across different settings (Chen et al., 2023; Forsblom et al., 2022; Putwain et al., 2018). The positive relations between utility value and enjoyment were confirmed in Finland, Norway, Serbia and Sweden, indicating some unique country patterns. In two Nordic countries (i.e. Finland and Sweden), the results showed that boys enjoyed learning mathematics more (Goetz et al., 2013; Hyde et al., 1990). Considering the effect of gender on motivation, boys had higher perceived competence in all six countries but had higher intrinsic value only in Estonia and Portugal (Rodríguez et al., 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020). Future analyses will try to unravel the possible mechanisms of these distinct country patterns, especially because girls are seen as more vulnerable and the impact of interest on mathematics achievement is more critical for them (Ganley & Lubienski, 2016). The latter is coupled with the notion that positive emotions associated with mathematics, such as enjoyment, could have a more pronounced effect on girls’ perseverance (Pinxten et al., 2014). There was no significant relationship between sex and utility value in any of the examined countries. Furthermore, the results for all countries showed that boys had higher mathematics achievement.
Classroom composition had a more pronounced influence on teachers’ beliefs in Sweden, Norway, Estonia and Serbia. Again, the phenomenon was not universal for all countries and might be tied to a distinctive education system organisation (Yang Hansen et al., 2020; Marsh et al., 2012). In Sweden, classrooms with a high percentage of students with behaviour problems had teachers with stronger beliefs about seeing mathematics as a process of inquiry. In classrooms with fewer students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families, teachers held stronger inquiry beliefs on the nature of mathematics and those on active learning. In Norwegian classrooms, teachers’ beliefs about learning mathematics as an active process were significantly firmer when they consisted of more students from disadvantaged socioeconomic families. In Estonia, there was a negative relationship between teachers’ beliefs about mathematics being a set of rules and classrooms comprising students with behavioural problems. That is, weaker beliefs about mathematics as a set of rules were found in classrooms with a higher percentage of students with behavioural problems. With a high proportion of students from advantaged socioeconomic families in the classrooms, the teachers in Serbia did not hold firmer beliefs on the nature of mathematics being a set of rules and procedures one should follow. Compared with other countries, in Estonia and Sweden, classroom mathematics achievement could be explained by other classroom-level predictors. Estonian classrooms with fewer behavioural problems had higher mathematics scores (Marsh et al., 2012). In Swedish classrooms, weaker teachers’ beliefs about rules were associated with higher math scores.
A distinctive element of the present study is that it examines relationships across countries using the same set of variables and relatively similar samples, thus contributing to methodological robustness in the domain (Lauermann & Berger, 2021). Against most studies using single-country samples, this cross-country comparison has allowed us to observe where particular patterns are unique, contradictory or possibly universal. For example, in the Nordic countries (i.e. Finland and Norway), classroom composition is an essential contributing factor to the differential motivation and enjoyment of learning mathematics by boys and girls. In Finland, boys had more enjoyment in classrooms with more students from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds. In Norway, boys were more externally motivated (i.e. higher utility value) to learn mathematics in classrooms composed of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged families. In contrast, girls’ intrinsic value was higher in classrooms with more students with behavioural problems. Described results warrant future investigations of distinctive characteristics pertinent to the education systems included in the analyses. These characteristics could explain possible differences in the presence of certain teacher beliefs against either classrooms with a low (high) percentage of students from socioeconomically disadvantaged homes or those saturated by students with behavioural problems, as well as why these might uniquely affect boys and girls.
Our results indicate that teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics moderate the within-classroom relationship between boys and girls and the motivation and enjoyment of learning mathematics in Portugal and Norway. Although aligned with some previous findings (e.g. Bohlmann & Weinstein, 2013; Heyder et al., 2020; Lauermann & Berger, 2021), again, the phenomenon was not captured across all the countries. In Portugal, the correlation between estimates from the negative significant slope regression was for Slope_PC on inquiry. The results showed that the effect of inquiry on students’ perceived competence was specific to student gender and higher for girls in Portugal. If teachers’ beliefs about the inquiry of mathematics were stronger, girls reported higher perceived competence related to mathematics. In Norway, we found a positive correlation between active learning and Slope_Intrinsic and Slope_Utility. This indicates that boys learn mathematics with higher intrinsic and utility values when teachers hold stronger beliefs about active learning. Nonetheless, this result still confirms the importance of constructivist learning beliefs and their contribution to students’ optimal outcomes (Lazarides & Watt, 2015; Reusser et al., 2011).
Limitations and further research
An ample cross-country sample, accounting for the nested structure of the data and TSEM, certainly contributes to the methodological rigour of the present study. Nonetheless, the current data come from one data point, meaning that no direct causal observations can be claimed. In addition, we relied on self-reported measures alone, despite these being gathered from students and their teachers. In terms of model selection, a random intercept model would not suffice to achieve the outlined study objectives, namely, investigating whether the gender gaps in mathematics motivation and enjoyment vary across different classrooms, and whether teacher beliefs may account for the cross-classroom differences in these gender gaps. Therefore, a random intercept and slope model with cross-level interaction is the most suitable analytical method for gaining insight in our research objectives. The results also posit that country-specific patterns may warrant additional demographic variables about the teachers and their classrooms, which could enable a more nuanced understanding of the patterns we were able to capture. This may include more information on teachers’ prior education, especially regarding their knowledge of mathematics. It should also be noted that the current sample mostly captures teachers whose major may not be mathematics (i.e. subject teaching is not yet the dominant format in primary school). The latter implies that observing how teachers’ beliefs affect their students’ motivational and emotional characteristics may differ in some systems after only one additional year of schooling (e.g. Portugal and Serbia transfer to subject teaching in grade 5).
Conclusion
Against the background of acknowledging the importance of teacher beliefs and their fundamental role in teaching mathematics and students’ learning processes (Daumiller et al., 2021; Hettinger et al., 2023; Heyder et al., 2020; Stipek et al., 2001), as well as distinctive motivational (Rodríguez et al., 2020; Wigfield & Eccles, 2020) and affective (Goetz et al., 2013; Pinxten et al., 2014) patterns between boys and girls related to mathematics, our results confirm that teachers’ beliefs have a certain moderating effect on primary students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics and that distinctive cross-level effects on boys and girls can be seen in the importance of classroom characteristics that support feelings of competence and connectedness (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020). At the same time, the observed phenomenon is not equally present in the examined countries, prompting the continuation of our current investigation and emphasising the importance of culture and situated experiences that may be built across observed classrooms and countries (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020). Nonetheless, the results support teachers’ beliefs that favour mathematics as a process of inquiry and those close to constructivist views of learning to be beneficial to students’ intrinsic value, perceived competence and enjoyment of mathematics.
References
Beswick, K. (2005). The beliefs/practice connection in broadly defined contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 39–68.
Beswick, K. (2007). Teachers’ beliefs that matter in secondary mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(1), 95–120.
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Theoretical framework, study design and main results of TEDS-M. In: Blömeke, S., Hsieh, FJ., Kaiser, G., Schmidt, W. (Eds.) International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn. Advances in mathematics education (pp. 19–47). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6437-8_2
Bohlmann, N., & Weinstein, R. S. (2013). Classroom context, teacher expectations, and cognitive level: Predicting children’s math ability judgments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 288–298.
Burr, J. E., & Hofer, B. K. (2002). Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2–3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00010-7
Chen, X., Zhou, J., Li, D., Liu, J., Dai, Y., & Zhou, T. (2023). Enjoyment of Chinese and mathematics and school performance in Chinese children and adolescents. Child Development, 94, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13843
Clements, D. H., & Samara, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333, 968–970.
Daumiller, M., Janke, S., Hein, J., Rinas, R., Dickhäuser, O., & Dresel, M. (2021). Do teachers’ achievement goals and self-efficacy beliefs matter for students’ learning experiences? Evidence from two studies on perceived teaching quality and emotional experiences. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101458
Dickhauser, O., & Meyer, W. (2006). Gender differences in young children’s math ability attributions. Psychology Science, 48(1), 3–16.
Dubberke, T., Kunter, M., McElvany, N., Brunner, M., & Baumert, J. (2008). Lerntheoretische Überzeugungen Von Mathematiklehrkräften: Einflüsse Auf die unterrichtsgestaltung und den Lernerfolg Von Schülerinnen Und Schülern [Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and their impact on instructional quality and student achievement]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(3–4), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random house.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 404–434). John Wiley & Sons.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self-and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747890150102
Felbrich, A., Kaiser, G., & Schmotz, C. (2012). The cultural dimension of beliefs: an investigation of future primary teachers’ epistemological beliefs concerning the nature of mathematics in 15 countries. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 44, 355–366.
Fennema, E. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics. In E.Fennema & G.Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and gender (pp. 169–187). Teachers College.
Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311015
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.
Forsblom, L., Pekrun, R., Loderer, K., & Peixoto, F. (2022). Cognitive appraisals, achievement emotions, and students’ math achievement: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 346–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000671
Ganley, C. M., & Lubienski, S. T. (2016). Mathematics confidence, interest, and performance: Examining gender patterns and reciprocal relations. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.002
Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics? Psychological Science, 24(10), 2079–2087. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486989
Grigutsch, S., Raatz, U., & Törner, G. (1998). Einstellungen gegenüber Mathematik Bei Mathe-Matiklehrern. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 19, 3–45.
Handal, B. (2003). Teachers’ mathematical beliefs: A review. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 47–57.
Hannula, M. S., Leder, G. C., Morselli, F., Vollstedt, M., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity: An introduction. Affect and Mathematics Education (pp. 3–14). Springer.
Hettinger, K., Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2023). Motivational climate in mathematics classrooms: Teacher self-efficacy for student engagement, student- and teacher-reported emotional support and student interest. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 55, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01430-x. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uio.no/
Heyder, A., Weidinger, A. F., Cimpian, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2020). Teachers’ belief that math requires innate ability predicts lower intrinsic motivation among low-achieving students. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101220.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14(3), 299–324.
Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J., & Möller, K. (2016). The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000041
Kuntze, S. (2011). Pedagogical content beliefs: Global, content domain-related and situation-specific components. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 273–292.
Laschke, C., & Blömeke, S. (2014). Teacher education and development study: Learning to teach mathematics (TEDS-M 2008). Dokumentation Der Erhebungsinstrumente. Waxmann.
Lauermann, F., & Berger, J. L. (2021). Linking teacher self-efficacy and responsibility with teachers’ self-reported and student-reported motivating styles and student engagement. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101441
Lauermann, F., & ten Hagen, I. (2021). Do teachers’ perceived teaching competence and self-efficacy affect students’ academic outcomes? A closer look at student-reported classroom processes and outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 56(4), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1991355
Lazarides, R., & Watt, H. M. (2015). Girls’ and boys’ perceived mathematics teacher beliefs, classroom learning environments and mathematical career intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.005
Leder, G. (2019). Mathematics-related beliefs and affect. In M. Hannula, G. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education, fresh perspectives on motivation, engagement, and identity (pp. 15–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-8_1
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
Lichtenfeld, S., Pekrun, R., Stupnisky, R. H., Reiss, K., & Murayama, K. (2012). Measuring students’ emotions in the early years: The achievement emotions questionnaire-elementary school (AEQ-ES). Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 190–201.
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A. J., Abduljabbar, A. S., & Köller, O. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47(2), 106–124.
Middleton, J. A., Wiezel, A., Jansen, A., & Smith, E. P. (2023). Tracing mathematics engagement in the first year of high school: Relationships between prior experience, observed support, and task-level emotion and motivation. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 55(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01432-9. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uio.no/
Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 317–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003317
Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54.
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2017). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables. Wiley.
OECD. (2018). PISA for development assessment and analytical framework: Reading, mathematics and science. OECD Publishing. https://doi-org.ezproxy.uio.no/10.1787/9789264305274-en
Peixoto, F., Radišić, J., Krstić, K., Hansen, K. Y., Laine, A., Baucal, A., Sormus, M., & Mata, L. (2023). Contribution to the validation of the expectancy-value scale for primary school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 41(3), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829221144868
Pekrun, R. (2017). Achievement emotions. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed., Vol. 142, pp. 251–271). Guilford Press. )
Philipp, R. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 257–315). Information Age Publishing.
Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 152–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028
Polly, D., McGee, J. R., Wang, C., Lambert, R. G., Pugalee, D. K., & Johnson, S. (2013). The association between teachers’ beliefs, enacted practices, and student learning in mathematics. Mathematics Educator, 22(2), 11–30.
Putwain, D. W., Pekrun, R., Nicholson, L. J., Symes, W., Becker, S., & Marsh, H. W. (2018). Control-value appraisals, enjoyment, and boredom in mathematics: A longitudinal latent interaction analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1339–1368. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218786689
Putwain, D. W., Schmitz, E. A., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2021). The role of achievement emotions in primary school mathematics: Control–value antecedents and achievement outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12367
Radišić, J. (2023). Student Mathematics Learning Outcomes. In Manizade, A., Buchholtz, N., & Beswick, K. (Eds.), The Evolution of Research on Teaching Mathematics. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era (pp. 197–223). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31193-2_7
Reusser, K., Pauli, C., & Elmer, A. (2011). Berufsbezogene Überzeugungen Von Lehrerinnen Und Lehrern. In E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, & M. Rothland (Eds.), Handbuch Der Forschung Zum Lehrerberuf (pp. 478–495). Waxmann.
Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). Macmillan.
Rodríguez, S., Regueiro, B., Piñeiro, I., Estévez, I., & Valle, A. (2020). Gender differences in mathematics motivation: Differential effects on performance in primary education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03050
Roeser, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Eccles, J., Harold, R. D., & Wigfield, A. (1993). Classroom experience and change in upper elementary students’ self and task beliefs in reading and math. Child Development, 64(3), 830–847.
Samuelsson, M., & Samuelsson, J. (2016). Gender differences in boys’ and girls’ perception of teaching and learning mathematics. Open Review of Educational Research, 3(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2015.1127770
Schmotz, C., Felbrich, A., & Kaiser, A. (2010). Überzeugungen Angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte für die Sekundarstufe I im internationalen Vergleich. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), ), TEDS-M 2008 – Professionelle Kompetenz Und Lerngelegenheiten Angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte für die Sekundarstufe I im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 279–306). Waxmann.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in Education, 4(1), 1–94.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge.
Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2016). The power of emotions: Can enjoyment and boredom explain the impact of individual preconditions and teaching methods on interest and performance in mathematics? Learning and Instruction, 44, 117–127.
Schukajlow, S., Leiss, D., Pekrun, R., Blum, W., Müller, M., & Messner, R. (2012). Teaching methods for modelling problems and students’ task-specific enjoyment, value, interest and self-efficacy expectations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79, 215–237.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2017). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 49, 307–322.
Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K., & Pekrun, R. (2023). Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Where we are today and where we need to go. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 55, 249–267.
Staub, F., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355.
Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2), 213–226.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 127–146). Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
Tiedemann, J. (2000). Gender-related beliefs of teachers in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003953801526
Törner, G. (2002). Mathematical beliefs—A search for a common ground: Some theoretical considerations on structuring beliefs, some research questions, and some phenomenological observations. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 73–94). Kluwer.
Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of teachers: Results from the COACTIV project (Vol 8, pp. 249–271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_12
Wang, M. T. (2012). Educational and career interests in math: A longitudinal examination of the links between classroom environment, motivational beliefs, and interests. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1643–1657. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027247
Watt, H. M. G., Shapka, J. D., Morris, Z. A., Durik, A. M., Keating, D. P., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Gendered motivational processes affecting high school mathematics participation, educational aspirations, and career plans: A comparison of samples from Australia, Canada, and the United States. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1594–1611. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027838
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193–202.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). 35 years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 7, pp. 161–198). Elsevier Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020). Relationship between pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and instructional practices in China. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 52, 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x
Yang Hansen, K., Radišić, J., Liu, X., & Glassow, L. N. (2020). Exploring diversity in the relationships between teacher quality and job satisfaction in the Nordic countries: Insights from TALIS 2013 and 2018. In Frønes, T.S., Pettersen, A, Radišić, J. & Buchholtz, N. (Eds.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education (pp 99–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_5
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Oslo (incl Oslo University Hospital) Research Council of Norway within FINNUT Programme for Research and Innovation in the Educational Sector (grant number 301033)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jelena Radišić. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Science, University of Oslo, Norway
Current themes of research:
Motivation for learning, academic emotions, teacher competence, teacher beliefs and instructional practices
Relevant publications:
Radišić, J., Nortvedt, G. A., & Runde, R. K. (2023). Relationships Between Mathematics Self-Beliefs, Exposure to ICT In School, and Achievement on PISA 2012 Paper- and Computer-Based Mathematics Assessments. In C. Martin, B. Miller, & D. Polly (Eds.), Technology Integration and Transformation in STEM Classrooms (pp. 223-246). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5920-1
Yang Hansen, K., Radišić, J., Ding, Y., & X. Liu (2022). Contextual effects on students’ achievement and academic self-concept in the Nordic and Chinese educational systems. Large-scale Assess Educ, 10, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00133-9
Radišić, J., Selleri, P., Carugati, F., & Baucal, A. (2021). Are students in Italy really disinterested in science? A person‐centered approach using the PISA 2015 data. Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21611
Yang Hansen,K., Radišić, J., Liu, X. & Glassow, L.N. (2020). Exploring diversity in the relationships between teacher quality and job satisfaction in the Nordic countries: Insights from TALIS 2013 and 2018 In Frønes, T.S., Pettersen, A., Radišić, J., & Buchholtz, N. (Eds.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education, Springer.
Radišić, J. & Baucal, A. (2018). Teachers’ reflection on PISA items and why they are so hard for students in Serbia. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 33(3), 445-466.
Nils Buchholtz. Faculty of Education, University of Hamburg, Germany
Current themes of research:
Teacher beliefs and practices, teacher education, teacher’s professional knowledge
Relevant publications:
Buchholtz, N., Stuart, A., & Frønes, T.S. (2020). Equity, Equality and Diversity—Putting Educational Justice in the Nordic Model to a Test. In T.S. Frønes, A. Pettersen, J. Radišić, & N. Buchholtz (Eds.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education (pp. 13–41). Cham: Springer.
Nortvedt, G. & Buchholtz, N. (2018). Assessment in mathematics education: responding to issues regarding methodology, policy, and equity. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50(4), 555–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0963-z Blömeke, S., Buchholtz, N., Suhl, U. & Kaiser, G. (2014). Resolving the chicken-or-egg causality dilemma: The longitudinal interplay of teacher knowledge and teacher beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 130-139.
Kajsa Yang Hansen. University West, Trollhättan, Sweden Department of Education and Special Education, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Current themes of research:
Educational equity, teacher competence, sociology of education, socioeconomic status, educational measurement
Relevant publications:
Yang Hansen, K., Radišić, J., Yi, D., & Liu, X. (2022). Contextual effects on students’ achievement and academic self-concept in the Nordic and Chinese educational systems. Large-scale Assess Educ, 10, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00133-9
Ding, Y., Yang Hansen, K., & Klapp, A. (2022). Testing measurement invariance of mathematics self-concept and self-efficacy in PISA using MGCFA and the alignment method. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1-24. Yang Hansen, K., Radišić, J., Liu, X. & Glassow, L.N. (2020). Exploring diversity in the relationships between teacher quality and job satisfaction in the Nordic countries: Insights from TALIS 2013 and 2018 In Frønes, T.S., Pettersen, A., Radišić, J., & Buchholtz, N. (Eds.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education, Springer.
Xin Liu. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Science, University of Oslo
Current themes of research:
Instructional quality and teacher effectiveness, Motivation, Teacher well-being and career development, International large-scale analysis, Educational measurement and assessment, Cross-cultural comparative education
Relevant publications :
Liu, X., Valcke, M., Yang Hansen, K., & De Neve, J. (2022). Does school-level instructional quality matter for school mathematics performance? Comparing teacher data across seven countries. Sustainability, 14(9), 5267. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095267
Yang Hansen, K., Radišić, J., Yi, D., & Liu, X. (2022). Contextual effects on students’ achievement and academic self-concept in the Nordic and Chinese educational systems. Large-scale Assess Educ, 10, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00133-9
Zhou, N., & Liu, X. (2022). The Study in the Profiles of Secondary Teachers’ Instructional Quality and their Relationship with Self-efficacy and Job Satisfaction: Based on the TALIS 2018 Shanghai Data. Shanghai Research on Education, 2022(1), 55-59.
Yang Hansen,K., Radišić, J., Liu, X. & Glassow, L.N. (2020). Exploring diversity in the relationships between teacher quality and job satisfaction in the Nordic countries: Insights from TALIS 2013 and 2018 In Frønes, T.S., Pettersen, A., Radišić, J., & Buchholtz, N. (Eds.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education, Springer.
Hege Kaarstein. Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Faculty of Educational Science, University of Oslo
Current themes of research:
Mathematics education, teacher competence, student motivation
Relevant publications:
Nilsen, T., Kaarstein, H., & Lehre, A.-C. (2022). Trend analyses of TIMSS 2015 and 2019: school factors related to declining performance in mathematics. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 10(1), 15. doi:10.1186/s40536-022-00134-8
Nilsen, T; Scherer, R; Gustafsson, J-E; Teig, N & Kaarstein, H. (2020). Teachers’ role in enhancing equity: A multilevel structural equation modeling with mediated moderation. I Frønes, Tove Stjern; Pettersen, Andreas; Radišić, Jelena & Buchholtz, Nils (Red.), Equity, Equality and Diversity in the Nordic Model of Education. Springer. ISSN 9783030616472. s. 173–196. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61648-9_7.
Kaarstein, H. (2014). A comparison of three frameworks for measuring knowledge for teaching mathematics. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. ISSN 1104-2176. 19(1), pp 23-52
Appendix
Appendix
Table 5
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Radišić, J., Buchholtz, N., Yang-Hansen, K. et al. Do teachers’ beliefs about the nature and learning of mathematics affect students’ motivation and enjoyment of mathematics? Examining differences between boys and girls across six countries. Eur J Psychol Educ 39, 1587–1613 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00809-6