Abstract
The Asiatic raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) has successfully colonized Northern, Eastern, and Central Europe, following 20th century introductions. While subject to eradication campaigns, its ecological impacts remain incompletely understood and debated. This study aims to examine the habitat preference and movement patterns of raccoon dogs in Denmark using GPS telemetry data. Habitat selection patterns were examined seasonally using Jacob’s electivity index. Movement intensity (travel speed) was examined according to temporal and environmental predictors such as time of day, time of year and habitat type. Raccoon dogs showed an overall preference for peatbogs, marshes, and broadleaf tree cover, and an overall avoidance of water bodies (per se), artificial surfaces and constructions, natural material surfaces (e.g., river pebble banks, beaches, sand dunes), cultivated areas, coniferous tree cover and herbaceous vegetation, and a close to neutral selection pattern for moors and heathland. Habitat usage was generally consistent throughout the seasons for all habitat types, apart from minor shifts observed, particularly from November to February. The raccoon dog exhibited a unimodal nocturnal activity pattern throughout all seasons, with highest mean travel speeds occurring during spring and lowest during winter. Prolonged periods of higher mean daily speeds were observed during autumn. Mean speed levels also varied according to habitat type, with raccoon dogs moving slower in habitats they preferred and faster in those they did not prefer. These results indicate that raccoon dogs in Denmark adjust their habitat selection and movement patterns throughout the year, with a general preference for moist and high tree coverage areas. This information can be utilized in forecasting models for their potential future range and area use in different regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Grey 1834), a medium-sized omnivorous canid, indigenous to East Asia, was introduced to the former USSR in the mid-1900s, where it rapidly established and spread throughout Central and Northern Europe at a rate of approximately 40 km per year, and occasionally up to 120 km per year (Lavrov 1971). In Denmark, the first raccoon dog was recorded in 1980 on the Jutland peninsula (Baagøe and Ujvári 2007), and since then the raccoon dog has established populations throughout Jutland but not yet on the remaining island regions of Eastern Denmark (Miljøstyrelsen 2020), although observations have been made on Funen (Pers. Comm. Mariann Chriél).
Following an increased presence of the raccoon dog across EU member states, the European Union classified the species as invasive in 2017, due to its estimated threat to native biodiversity (European Union 2017). Primary concerns regarding their threat to biodiversity revolve around the negative impacts that the raccoon dog may have on native mesopredator and prey species; particularly regarding the predation of threatened bird and amphibian populations. In addition, the potential for disease transmission exists, such as the rabies virus, tapeworm (Echinococcus multilocularis), roundworm (Trichinella spiralis) and sarcoptic mange (Sarcoptes scabiei) (Kauhala and Kowalczyk 2011), however, there are no known pathogens that have been newly introduced by the raccoon dog to Europe (Pagh and Chriél 2017). The raccoon dog may locally predate ground nesting bird colonies (Koshev et al. 2020; Salewski and Schmidt 2019; Viksne et al. 2011), and may successfully scare away nesting birds as large as graylag geese (Anser anser) (Dahl and Åhlén 2019). This is particularly concerning as ground-nesting bird populations are in severe decline across Europe (McMahon et al. 2020). Amphibian species, particularly those with vulnerable isolated populations are another topic of concern (Miljøstyrelsen 2017; Mulder 2013) as amphibians and their spawn are a common occurrence in the raccoon dog diet, especially during the spring and summer months (Elmeros et al. 2018; Sutor et al. 2010). Nevertheless, there is no evidence that these organism groups are doing worse in parts of Europe long occupied by raccoon dogs than elsewhere. Various studies have examined the niche overlap between the raccoon dog and native mesopredators in Europe, such as the red fox (Vulpes vulpes), badger (Meles meles), pole cat (Mustela putorius), and pine marten (Martes martes) (Baltrunaité 2010; Drygala and Zoller 2013a, c; Elmeros et al. 2018; Kauhala et al. 1998b; Sidorovich et al. 2000a). They were found to indeed have niche overlap, particularly dietary, however, differences in diet were variable enough that only minor competition may occur when resources are plentiful (Drygala and Zoller 2013b; Elmeros et al. 2018; Jędrzejewski et al. 1989; Kauhala et al. 1998a; Sidorovich et al. 2000b). In times of limited resources, and in areas where the raccoon dog does not display winter passivity, competition with native predators could potentially occur (Watabe and Saito 2022). Raccoon dogs may utilize badger setts and fox dens for shelter and pup rearing, and have been observed to peacefully cohabitate with badgers and foxes (Kowalczyk et al. 2008). Although evidence of localized influence on prey species and niche overlap with other mesopredators exists, the general impact that the raccoon dog has on Europe’s native biodiversity remains unclear.
The raccoon dog is an opportunistic generalist, having a wide dietary niche (Castelló 2018; Elmeros et al. 2018), a high reproductive capacity (Helle and Kauhala 1995; Kauhala 1996b; Kowalczyk et al. 2009; Pagh et al. 2020), effective dispersal (Drygala et al. 2010; Herfindal et al. 2016), and an ability to hibernate (Kauhala and Saeki 2004; Mustonen et al. 2007; Ward and Wurster-Hill 1990); all of which collectively attribute to their successful establishment of novel areas. In general, they prefer habitats such as meadows, moist deciduous and mixed forests with abundant understory, river valleys, lakeshores, marshes, and moist heath. However, they are also known to occupy other habitats such as woodlands and agricultural areas (Castelló 2018). Habitat use by raccoon dogs can be affected by the availability of food (Castelló, 2018), shelter and suitable den sites. Raccoon dogs are largely nocturnal; however, they may also be quite active during the day but typically only if they have thick vegetation as refuge (Ikeda et al. 2016; Kauhala et al. 2007; Schwemmer et al. 2021; Zoller and Drygala 2013). In Finland, periods of highest seasonal activity are between March and April, potentially due to the mating season and in response to an increase in food availability. Periods of lowest activity are between November and February (Kauhala et al. 2007), associated with a period of winter dormancy or intermittent wintertime passivity (Mustonen et al. 2007; Süld et al. 2017). During the autumn months, raccoon dogs accumulate extensive fat stores (Korhonen et al. 1991), in preparation for winter dormancy (Kauhala and Saeki 2004; Ward and Wurster-Hill 1990).
Scientific research examining raccoon dog ecology in Denmark is limited, and ecological assessments in different ecoregions will allow for more accurate and effective risk assessments regarding the species’ impact on native biodiversity. Therefore, this study aimed to examine relevant ecological traits of the raccoon dog in Denmark, including habitat preferences and movement patterns such as travel speed, using GPS-based telemetry data, to provide a better understanding of the role that the raccoon dog plays in the ecosystem. Habitat preferences were examined according to the biological seasons, and travel speed was examined according to time of day, time of year and habitat type. Further examination of travel speed was made according to the time of day across biological seasons. Referring to results from similar studies in Europe, we hypothesized that the raccoon dog in Denmark would exhibit distinct shifts in their:
-
(i)
Selection of habitat types according to the biological seasons, with an overall preference for high-coverage forests and habitats closely associated with water,
-
(ii)
Travel speed according to the time of day between the biological seasons, by exhibiting a unimodal nocturnal activity pattern, and higher speeds during the spring and summer months, and lower speeds during the winter denning months, and
-
(iii)
Travel speed according to habitat type, by exhibiting lower speeds in preferred habitats and higher speeds in avoided habitats.
Methods
Study area
The study area includes the Danish peninsula of Jutland as well as the neighboring island region of Funen (56.2639°N, 9.5018°E) (Appendix A – Fig. 6). This is the region of Denmark where raccoon dogs are known to be established. The study area spans approximately 32,800 km2 and shares a border with Germany. The land is heavily cultivated with 65.8% of the land area being dedicated to agricultural practices (Bank 2018), and the remaining proportion of natural land primarily consisting of coniferous and deciduous forests, wetlands, coastal dunes, grasslands, and moors and heathlands. Denmark is low in elevation with average elevation being 31 m above sea level, and has a temperate climate with an average annual temperature of 9.1 °C and extreme temperatures of -23.1 °C and 34 °C (2011–2020) (Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut 2021).
Telemetry data preparation
The telemetry data used in this study was collected via GPS-based satellite transmitters in the form of radio-collars which were placed on feral raccoon dogs that were trapped and released back into Danish nature on both Jutland and Funen for monitoring purposes over the course of 10 years (2011–2020). All trapping, collaring, and handling of raccoon dogs occurred prior to the commencement of this study. The collared raccoon dogs were released into areas that were deliberately chosen by the monitoring program and were also manually moved from place to place on occasion. This monitoring of raccoon dogs is part of a national program run by the Environmental Protection Agency—Ministry of Environment of Denmark (Naturstyrelsen 2010). The primary objective of this monitoring effort was to utilize the knowledge of raccoon dog monogamous pairing behavior to locate others to facilitate more effective eradication efforts. Individuals that were collared were adults and the sex of the individual was only recorded if they were used on a long term basis. The geospatial telemetry data was collected via an enterprise known as “FollowIt” (Followit 2018).
The geographic location of each collar was recorded at various time intervals with the majority being recorded at 10-min, 2-h and 3-h time intervals. The coordinates were registered in decimal degrees formatting, in addition to the date and time of point registration. The coordinates were converted to UTM format prior to analysis and mapped in qGIS (version 3.1). Before using the raw coordinate data, coordinate duplicates, points registered outside Jutland and Funen (except those registered in northern Germany, indicating movement between Denmark and Germany), locations where raccoon dogs were known to be handled, and if the interfix speed exceeded 20 km per hour (indicating car travel), were removed.
Habitat selection
Telemetry and land cover data preparation
For the habitat selection analysis, telemetry data registered within Denmark only was used, and the first three days of each individual raccoon dog’s telemetry data were removed from the dataset to minimize bias in habitat choice associated with the deliberate human placement of the individual. To categorize habitat types, a land cover raster layer of Denmark was acquired from the Sentinel-2 Global Land Cover project (Malinowski et al. 2020). In Denmark, 10 land cover classes were present: artificial surfaces and constructions, cultivated areas, broadleaf tree cover, coniferous tree cover, herbaceous vegetation, moors and heathland, marshes, peatbogs, natural material surfaces (f.ex. river pebble banks, sand dunes, beaches), and water bodies (full descriptions found in Appendix A - Fig. 5). The overall accuracy of this land cover estimation was estimated at 94% (Malinowski et al. 2020). To limit the raster layer to only include areas that raccoon dogs can physically access, the layer was cropped further to the size of the Danish land mass with a 3 km coastal buffer, which included portions of the ocean and fjords (see Appendix A - Fig. 6). The buffer range of 3 km was chosen because there were a few telemetry points located within this distance from the coastline, specifically within the fjords.
Analysis
Habitat selection was analyzed across four seasons, which were defined according to previous literature (Drygala et al. 2008; Zoller and Drygala 2013). The seasons include oestrus and gestation (OG, March – April), birth and cub-rearing (BCR, May—July), extensive foraging and fat accumulation (EF, August – October) and reduced activity (RA, November – February). To determine if any particular habitat type was being either selected or avoided, an electivity index (Jacob’s D) was calculated for each individual within each habitat type (Manly et al. 1993). The formula used for calculating this index is as follows:
where r represents the proportion of habitat used, and p represents the proportion of habitat available. The electivity index (D) may range from -1 to + 1, where negative values indicate avoidance and positive values indicate selection. A value of 0 indicates neutrality, with neither selection nor avoidance. The proportion of habitat available (p) was calculated uniquely to each individual based on the proportion of each habitat type found within their unique utilization distribution (UD). The UD was calculated using kernel density estimation, using a 95% isopleth level and reference bandwidth. To ensure an accurate UD estimation, only individuals with a minimum of 40 telemetry points were included in this analysis (Kauhala et al. 2010; Seaman et al. 1999), resulting in a total of 129 individuals with the mean number of telemetry points per individual being 1,900, the minimum being 41 and the maximum being 5,992. To ensure that the UD represented areas raccoon dogs could realistically access, the UD was cropped to have the same boundaries as the land cover raster with a 3 km coastal buffer (see Appendix A - Fig. 7b). A land cover raster layer was created for each individual that corresponded to their UD size, and the proportion of each habitat type available was determined by extracting the raster values from their unique raster layers and dividing the number of each habitat’s raster cells by the total number of raster cells. This method assumes that all geographic areas within the individual’s UD are equally accessible to the individual. Each individual’s telemetry data was subset according to season and the UD was estimated according to this data (for an example, see Appendix A - Fig. 8). For individuals monitored over multiple years, the seasonal data was pooled together for all years.
The proportion of habitat used (r) was defined as the number of telemetry points for each individual found within each habitat type, divided by the total number of telemetry points of that individual. Only the telemetry points found within the individual’s UD were used. Once the proportion of habitat used and available were calculated, the electivity index was calculated for each habitat and individual separately.
Statistical analysis
To determine if habitat use was selective or random, the selection index value for each habitat type across four seasons was tested for being significantly different from the value of 0. The Anderson–Darling test was used to test for normality, and a One Sample T-test was used for normally distributed data, and a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used for non-normal data.
To determine if the selection pattern for each habitat type varied according to season, linear mixed effect models were built for each habitat type separately (see Appendix A - Table 3 and Statistical modelling for model details and methodology). To test if the fixed effect Season had a significant influence on the response variable Selection Index, Wald Chi-Square tests were performed when normality assumptions were met, whereas the Kruskal Wallis Rank Sum Test was used when normality assumptions were not met. If significant, Multiple Comparisons of Means with Tukey Contrasts was used for the normal data, and the Dunn test for the non-normal data, to determine which seasons differed from one another.
Travel speed
Telemetry data preparation
For the analysis of travel speed the first three days of data collection and the data acquired from individuals that traveled between Denmark and Germany’s border were included. To examine each individual’s path of movement, a ‘track’ was built using the make_track function of the amt package using R software. This track consisted of all registered fixes placed in consecutive order by time per individual. The track for each individual was converted into a ‘step’ format, using the steps function of the amt package which compiles two consecutive telemetry points into one ‘step’ using ‘step length (straight-line distance)’ and ‘step time duration’ (hereafter referred to as ‘interfix time’ (IT).
Analysis
We used the animal’s rate of travel (speed, in meters/hour) to infer overall activity patterns according to (Ensing et al. 2014; Merrill and Mech 2003; Owen-Smith and Goodall 2014; Palomares and Delibes 1993). Through the examination of movement intensity, we can generally infer the type of activity that the animal is executing, with slower speeds indicating rest, or intense foraging and higher speeds indicating directional movement activities, such as dispersal. For each individual, the rate of travel was calculated for each step of their track. The rate of travel for each step was calculated as follows:
The IT was chosen based on prioritizing the lowest possible IT to optimize accuracy of speed calculations while still maintaining a high enough sample size for further analysis. The majority of the telemetry data was collected using ITs of 3 h, 1 h, 6 h and 10 min (in that order). There was a 2-min buffer around each IT, therefore the ITs included in this analysis are of a 2-min range (see Appendix B - Fig. 9 and Table 7). Only individuals with a minimum of 50 ‘steps’ were used in the analysis.
Travel speed was examined according to two main predictors: the time of day between seasons (defined by 24 h across four seasons) and habitat type (defined by 10 habitat types). The seasons were defined according to the raccoon dog’s biological seasons. Due to sample size constraints, the seasons for this analysis were redefined as OG (April), BCR (July), EF (October) and RA (January).
To optimize the analysis in response to sample size constraints, different ITs were used according to the hypothesis being tested. To choose the most appropriate IT for each hypothesis, priorities were given to choosing that i) which was lowest, ii) provided a high enough overall sample size, iii) and provided a relatively well-balanced design. For examining Speed according to time of day between seasons, an IT of 10 min was used (Appendix B - Tables 8 and 9), according to habitat type an IT of 3 h was used (Appendix B - Table 10). To understand the methodology behind these choices please refer to Appendix B (Methodology).
The habitat type variable represented the same ten land cover categories as in the habitat selection analysis and was developed by extracting the raster values from the land cover raster for each corresponding ‘step’ that was used to calculate each speed value. Since each ‘step’ used to estimate speed is comprised of two consecutive telemetry points, one of the telemetry points was chosen to extract the raster values to. It was determined that using either the first or last telemetry point of the ‘step’ did not make a difference in the percent variation explained of the Speed variable, so the habitat type of the first telemetry point of the ‘step’ was used to create the variable.
Statistical analysis
All models used in this analysis were linear mixed effects models (see Appendix B - Table 11 and Statistical modelling for model details and methodology). The residuals of all models were not normally distributed; therefore, response variables were log10 transformed to meet the assumptions of a linear mixed effects model. Post hoc pairwise comparisons for the model terms of interest were performed by estimating the least square means (otherwise known as estimated marginal means) for the fixed effect term of interest and then performing pairwise comparisons on these means (using the ls_means function of the lmerTest package (Kuznetsova 2020)). Least square means were used due to the unbalanced nature of the experimental groups and to account for the presence of other influential variables within the model (Mangiafico 2016).
Results
Habitat selection
Availability and usage of habitat types
The largest proportion of land area was cultivated areas (37.3%), water bodies (19.6%) and herbaceous vegetation (19.3%). While the most raccoon dog telemetry points were found in peatbogs (24.5%), marshes (21.2%), cultivated areas (17.6%), herbaceous vegetation (14.4%), and broadleaf tree cover (11.3%) (Fig. 1, Appendix A – Table 1).
Selection according to season
Throughout the year, the raccoon dog consistently preferred peatbogs, marshes, and broadleaf tree cover and consistently avoided water bodies, natural material surfaces, cultivated areas, and artificial surfaces and constructions. The degree of preference or avoidance of these habitat types varied only slightly between the seasons. In contrast, the raccoon dog’s selection patterns in coniferous tree cover and herbaceous vegetation varied between preference and avoidance throughout the year, with these habitats being avoided during the summer months and preferred or neutral during the winter months (Fig. 2, Appendix A – Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Overall variation in the median selection or avoidance of habitats observed between the seasons was highest in coniferous tree cover (ΔSI 0.62), followed by moors and heathland (ΔSI 0.57), cultivated areas (ΔSI 0.43), herbaceous vegetation (ΔSI 0.35), broadleaf tree cover (ΔSI 0.20), artificial surfaces and constructions (ΔSI 0.13), peatbogs (ΔSI 0.11), marshes (ΔSI 0.08), water bodies (ΔSI 0.02), and lastly natural material surfaces (ΔSI 0.0). Overall selection patterns across all habitats were most similar between the BCR and EF seasons, and most dissimilar between BCR and RA (Appendix A - Table 6).
Travel speed
Raccoon dogs traveled with an overall mean speed of 402 m/h ± 799 SD (IT: 10 min, N = 30), 229 m/h ± 467 SD (IT: 1 h, N = 115), and 280 m/h ± 500 SD (IT: 3 h, N = 111) (Appendix B – Table 7).
Time of day
The time of day played a significant role in explaining variation in travel speed (Appendix B – Table 12), with there being a unimodal nocturnal trend. Nocturnal behaviour was observed consistently throughout each biological season with minor variations; the most notable occurring during the peak hours of movement. Daily travel speeds were lowest during RA, followed by EF, then BCR, and highest during OG. Higher speed levels persisted for longer during EF, and significantly higher speeds occurred during the peak hours of BCR and OG, particularly when compared to RA (Fig. 3, Appendix B – Tables 13, 14 and 15).
Habitat type
Raccoon dog travel speed varied significantly between habitat types, with the highest mean speeds being in artificial surfaces and constructions, water bodies, natural material surfaces and cultivated areas, and the lowest speeds being in peatbogs and marshes. (Fig. 4, Appendix B – Tables 16, 17, 18 and 19).
Discussion
Reliability of the method
Habitat selection
Autocorrelation of the telemetry points may be a challenge in telemetry data, however, studies have found that the benefits associated with controlling for autocorrelation, do not outweigh the costs of not controlling for autocorrelation, as it can severely reduce the sample size and also limit the biological significance of the analysis (De Solla et al. 1999; Fieberg 2007). Lastly, the inability to analyze differences in habitat selection patterns according to sex, was another limitation, as there was a limited number of individuals that were sexed within the dataset, and there was also a strong bias of males being monitored as opposed to females.
Travel speed
The complications associated with interpreting speed values estimated at different IT´s lie with making accurate distance traveled estimates between the telemetry points used to estimate speed. The distance traveled between the two points is measured as a straight-line distance, which often is not representative of the actual trajectory that the animal travels. Common biases associated with straight-line distance estimation is the sampling frequency of the points, and tortuosity of the path traveled – which can vary incredibly according to various factors. Animals with more directional movements (lower tortuosity), may be in the process of dispersing, whereas an animal with nondirectional movements (higher tortuosity), may be considered established (Herfindal et al. 2016). The straight-line distance traveled can vary substantially according to the sampling frequency used where distance traveled is increasingly underestimated, and that several fixes per minute are required to achieve tolerably accurate estimates (Noonan et al. 2019; Rowcliffe et al. 2012; Sennhenn-Reulen et al. 2017). Research has shown that with a one minute sampling interval, distance was underestimated by 6.3% on average, and with a 2 h sampling interval, distance was underestimated by 32.3% (Sennhenn-Reulen et al. 2017). It was therefore a priority to use the lowest IT possible if sample size allowed.
Habitat selection
The preference for peatbogs, marshes and broadleaf tree cover corresponds to various other studies within the raccoon dogs introduced range (Baltrunaité 2010; Kauhala and Auttila 2010; Melis et al. 2015; Mustonen et al. 2012). Preference for these habitats was observed year-round, indicating their importance throughout the year as habitats that are providing their main source of food. The overall avoidance of artificial surfaces and constructions, and water bodies corresponds to other research (Drygala et al. 2008; Sutor and Schwarz 2013). Overall selection patterns across all habitats were most similar between the birth and cub rearing and extended foraging seasons, and most dissimilar between birth and cub rearing and reduced activity seasons. This dissimilarity was expected, as in Denmark—resource availability is highest during the months of birth and cub rearing and lowest during the months of reduced activity. During periods of lower resource availability, it would be most advantageous for the raccoon dog to broaden its habitat selection patterns to optimize sufficient resource and shelter acquisition.
During the reduced activity season, raccoon dogs showed markedly different selection patterns compared to the other seasons, specifically within four habitats: broadleaf tree cover, coniferous tree cover, herbaceous vegetation, and moors and heathland. They used these habitat types more during the winter than during the other three seasons. Similar preferences for coniferous and deciduous forests during winter were found in Germany, Finland, and Lithuania. The higher preference for broadleaf and coniferous tree cover during winter in Denmark may indicate that they are utilizing this habitat type for denning, shelter and resting purposes as well as for food, considering these forests offer berries year round, which are known to be a reliable food source prior to and throughout winter (Elmeros et al. 2018; Kauhala 1993; Sutor et al. 2010). In Sweden, the raccoon dog selected coniferous forests during winter but selected against the habitat during the rest of the year (Melis et al. 2015). In Germany, raccoon dogs were observed utilizing abandoned badger setts in coniferous forests all year round, for the purpose of daytime resting places, shelter from bad weather, winter resting, and for cub-rearing (Sutor and Schwarz 2012), and in Poland, an increased use of burrows and hollow trees (which are primarily found in forests) as den sites occurred as mean daily temperature decreased (Kowalczyk and Zalewski 2011). In Denmark, used badger setts are more likely to be found in areas of high forest coverage (Jepsen et al. 2005).
The shift from avoidance to an almost neutral selection pattern for herbaceous vegetation and moors and heathland during the winter indicates that during times of lower resource availability, these habitat types become useful to the raccoon dog. In Finland, raccoon dogs preferred moist heaths during the winter months due to the availability of berries (Kauhala 1996a), and in Sweden the raccoon dog showed a neutral selection pattern for heathlands and meadows during the winter but selected against these habitats during the rest of the year (Melis et al. 2015). In Germany, it was found that grasslands were a preferred habitat throughout the year, as these conditions are suitable for various prey species of the raccoon dog, such as small mammals, birds and invertebrates (Sutor and Schwarz 2013). Certain insectivores (primarily shrews) and birds are frequently consumed prey items during the winter in Denmark (Elmeros et al. 2018), which may explain the shift to neutral selection pattern of herbaceous vegetation in our study. This shift in preference may indicate an increased use of areas located closer to human settlements, such as mowed yards and gardens. Artificial surfaces, which was classified largely as human settlement areas and major highway systems, were also utilized slightly more during the winter months. This slight increase in usage of artificial surfaces during the winter may be due to the opportunistic foraging of carrion occurring near human settlement areas. In Finland, (Mustonen et al. 2012) found that anthropogenic areas such as gardens, roads, and railroads were all preferred habitats of the raccoon dog during winter. The preference for gardens was supported by their winter diet analysis which indicated consumption of anthropogenic food sources, which has been observed in other areas of Europe (Mustonen et al. 2012; Süld et al. 2017; Sutor et al. 2010).
During the birth/cub-rearing season, four habitats; broadleaf tree cover, coniferous tree cover, herbaceous vegetation and moors and heathland, saw an overall decrease in usage. The opposite trend was observed within cultivated areas where usage during birth and cub rearing increased, however it was still avoided. In Germany, a similar result was found, where raccoon dogs avoided farmland areas except during the cub-rearing season where there was a neutral selection pattern for the habitat, and a slight difference between the sexes was found with selection of cereal fields where females preferred this habitat and males did not (Drygala et al. 2008). Cultivated areas may become a more useful habitat for females during the cub-rearing season, while she is out foraging to maintain her milk supply, or it may simply be a matrix habitat that may be located near the den-site. During cub-rearing, habitat preference may not only depend on rich habitats in relation to basic diet, but also the need for a place of refuge for the cubs. The need for a safe denning place may limit habitat use to be more local around the den.
Travel speed
We predicted that the raccoon dog in Denmark would display a unimodal nocturnal activity pattern with minor shifts throughout the year, with lower speeds during the winter and higher speeds during the spring/summer. Our results showed that the raccoon dog indeed displayed such patterns, with peak speeds occurring at night, and minimal movement occurring during the day, across all four seasons. This has been observed in a variety of studies across the raccoon dog’s introduced range (Drygala et al. 2001; Kauhala et al. 2007; Schwemmer et al. 2021; Zoller and Drygala 2013), and native range (Ikeda et al. 2016; Seki and Koganezawa 2011, N. viverrinus subspecies). Diurnal activity was observed as well, although much less frequently. Changes in diurnal activity has been observed between the seasons in other studies, where the proportion of daytime movements increased as mean daily air temperatures decreased (Seki and Koganezawa 2011), and where diurnal activity was more prevalent during the cub-rearing season and correlated positively with increasing day length (Zoller and Drygala 2013). We observed an increase in diurnal activity during the birth/cub-rearing season where speed was significantly higher than all the other seasons during hours 06, 07 and 12, which corresponds to other studies (Ikeda et al. 2016; Ogurtsov et al. 2018; Zoller and Drygala 2013). This increased level of diurnal activity is likely due to the 24-h care associated with rearing cubs. Other minor variations in daily movement patterns were observed seasonally, with the lowest speed levels occurring during the reduced activity season, and highest occurring during oestrus/gestation and birth/cub-rearing seasons. Mating can occur between February – March (Helle and Kauhala 1995; Miljøstyrelsen 2020), when male spermatogenic cells (Qiang et al. 2003) and testosterone (Rudert et al. 2011) reach their peak levels. This increased travel speed during the month of April relative to the other months may be a result of mating behavior. Raccoon dogs may also exhibit an increase in foraging activity following an extended period of reduced activity over winter. During the extensive foraging/fat accumulation season higher speed levels were maintained for a longer period, which is likely due to an increase in time spent foraging in a 24-h period, in preparation for winter.
We predicted that the raccoon dog would travel slower in habitats that were preferred and faster in habitats that were avoided, when compared to the habitat selection analysis. According to ‘area restricted search’ behavior, an animal will remain in an area longer where resources are high as opposed to areas where resources are low, and will also move more slowly and tortuously in such high resource areas (Turchin 1998). Our results correspond well with this theory and our prediction, with raccoon dogs moving faster within their avoided habitats and slower within their preferred habitats. In Japan, a similar pattern was observed, where the raccoon dog displayed slower speeds in habitats that were favored (Saeki et al. 2007). Our results provide indirect evidence of raccoon dog habitat preferences and supports the results from our habitat selection analysis.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the raccoon dog in Denmark possesses ecological traits that are similar to their conspecifics found elsewhere in their introduced range. They prefer moist habitats and high coverage forests year-round and will additionally favor coniferous forests and heathlands during winter. They exhibit a unimodal nocturnal activity pattern throughout the year with highest speeds occurring during spring and summer and lowest during winter. They are capable of shifting their habitat use and movement intensity according to season in response to environmental stimulus, and with a gradually warming climate, these patterns may shift during the milder winters to come. With their overall level of ecological plasticity, the raccoon dog is likely capable of adapting to the ongoing climatic changes locally in much of Europe and expand their current distribution even further. Having a detailed understanding of how the raccoon dog interacts with its environment on a local scale can inform assessments regarding their likely future presence and space use as well as any associated ecological effects in the study region and potentially also more broadly.
Availability of data and material
Access to data may be achieved by contacting the corresponding author and with permission from the Danish Ministry of Environment.
References
Baagøe HJ, Ujvári M (2007) Mårhund. In HJ Baagøe, TS Jensen (Ed.), Dansk Pattedyratlas 1 ed, Gyldendal, Copenhagen, pp 182
Baltrunaité L (2010) Winter habitat use, niche breadth and overlap between the red fox, pine marten and raccoon dog in different landscapes of Lithuania. Folia Zool 59(4):278–284. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v59.i4.a2.2010
Bank TW (2018) Agricultural land (% of land area) - Denmark. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.AGRI.ZS?locations=DK. Accessed 6 Oct 2021
Castelló JR (2018) Siberian Raccoon Dog. In Canids of the World: Wolves, Wild Dogs, Foxes, Jackals, Coyotes, and Their Relatives Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, pp 262–263
Dahl F, Åhlén P-A (2019) Nest predation by raccoon dog nyctereutes procyonoides in the archipelago of northern Sweden. Biol Invasions 21(3):743–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1855-4
Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut (2021) Temperaturen i Danmark. https://www.dmi.dk/klima/temaforside-klimaet-frem-til-i-dag/temperaturen-i-danmark/. Accessed 10 January 2021
De Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68(2):221–234. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x
Drygala F, Mix HM, Stier N, Roth M (2001) Preliminary findings from ecological studies of the racoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) in eastern Germany. Z Oekol Natschutz 9:147–152
Drygala F, Stier N, Zoller H, Boegelsack K, Mix HM, Roth M (2008) Habitat use of the raccon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) in north-eastern Germany. Mamm Biol 73(5):371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2007.09.005
Drygala F, Zoller H (2013a) Diet composition of the invasive raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the native red fox (vulpes vulpes) in north-east Germany. Hystrix 24(2):190–194. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-24.2-8867
Drygala F, Zoller H (2013b) Diet composition of the invasive raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) and the native red fox (vulpes vulpes) in north-east Germany. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 24(2):190–194. https://doi.org/10.4404/hystrix-24.2-8867
Drygala F, Zoller H (2013c) Spatial use and interaction of the invasive raccoon dog and the native red fox in Central Europe: competition or coexistence? Eur J Wildl Res 59(5):683–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-013-0722-y
Drygala F, Zoller H, Stier N & Roth M (2010) Dispersal of the raccoon dog nyctereutes procyonoides into a newly invaded area in Central Europe. Wildl Biol 16(2):150–161, 112. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2981/08-076
Elmeros M, Mikkelsen DMG, Nørgaard LS, Pertoldi C, Jensen TH, Chriél M (2018) The diet of feral raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and native badger (Meles meles) and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark. Mammal Res 63(4):405–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-018-0372-2
Ensing EP, Ciuti S, de Wijs FALM, Lentferink DH, Ten Hoedt A, Boyce MS et al (2014) GPS based daily activity patterns in European red deer and North American elk (cervus elaphus): indication for a weak circadian clock in ungulates. PLoS ONE 9(9):e106997–e106997. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106997
Fieberg J (2007) Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. Ecology 88(4):1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0930
Followit AB (2018) Followit. https://www.followit.se/. Accessed 2 Jan 2021
Helle E, Kauhala K (1995) Reproduction in the raccoon dog in Finland. J Mammal 76(4):1036–1046. https://doi.org/10.2307/1382597
Herfindal I, Melis C, Åhlén P-A, Dahl F (2016) Lack of sex-specific movement patterns in an alien species at its invasion front – consequences for invasion speed. Ecol Evol 6(16):5570–5584. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2300
Ikeda T, Uchida K, Matsuura Y, Takahashi H, Yoshida T, Kaji K et al (2016) Seasonal and diel activity patterns of eight sympatric mammals in Northern Japan revealed by an intensive camera-trap survey. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0163602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163602
Jędrzejewski W, Jędrzejewska B, Szymura A (1989) Food niche overlaps in a winter community of predators in the BiaBowif|a Primeval Forest, Poland. Acta Theriol 34:487–496
Jepsen JU, Madsen AB, Karlsson M, Groth D (2005) Predicting distribution and density of European badger (meles meles) setts in Denmark. Biodivers Conserv 14(13):3235–3253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-0444-2
Kauhala K (1993) Growth, size, and fat reserves of the raccoon dog in Finland. Acta Theriol 38:139–150. https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.93-12
Kauhala K (1996a) Habitat use of raccoon dogs (nyctereutes procyonoides) in southern Finland. Z Saeugetierkd 61:269–275
Kauhala K (1996b) Reproductive strategies of the raccoon dog and the red fox in Finland. Acta Theriol 41(1):51–58
Kauhala K, Auttila M (2010) Habitat preferences of the native badger and the invasive raccoon dog in southern Finland. Acta Theriol 55(3):231–240. https://doi.org/10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.040.2009
Kauhala K, Holmala K, Schregel J (2007) Seasonal activity patterns and movements of the raccoon dog, a vector of diseases and parasites, in southern Finland. Z Saeugetierkd 72(6):342–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2006.10.006
Kauhala K, Kowalczyk R (2011) Invasion of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides in Europe: history of colonization, features behind its success, and threats to native fauna. Curr Zool 57(5):584–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.5.584
Kauhala K, Laukkanen P, Rége I (1998a) Summer food composition and food niche overlap of the raccoon dog, red fox and badger in Finland. Ecography (copenhagen) 21(5):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00436.x
Kauhala K, Laukkanen P, Rége I (1998b) Summer food composition and food niche overlap of the raccoon dog, red fox and badger in Finland. Ecography 21(5):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1998.tb00436.x
Kauhala K, Saeki M (2004) Raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides. In: Hoffman M, Macdonald DW, Sillero-Zubiri C (eds) Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, pp 136–142
Kauhala K, Schregel J, Auttila M (2010) Habitat impact on raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides home range size in southern Finland. Acta Theriol 55(4):371–380. https://doi.org/10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.063.2009
Korhonen H, Mononen J, Harri M (1991) Evolutionary comparison of energy economy between finnish and Japanese raccoon dogs. Comp Biochem Physiol A 100(2):293–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(91)90472-O
Koshev YS, Petrov MM, Nedyalkov NP, Raykov IA (2020) Invasive raccoon dog depredation on nests can have strong negative impact on the dalmatian pelican’s breeding population in Bulgaria. Eur J Wildl Res 66(5):85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-020-01423-9
Kowalczyk R, Jędrzejewska B, Zalewski A, Jędrzejewski W (2008) Facilitative interactions between the Eurasian badger (meles meles), the red fox (vulpes vulpes), and the invasive raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) in Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland. Can J Zool 86(12):1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1139/z08-127
Kowalczyk R, Zalewski A (2011) Adaptation to cold and predation–shelter use by invasive raccoon dogs nyctereutes procyonoides in Biaowiea Primeval Forest (Poland). Eur J Wildl Res 57(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-010-0406-9
Kowalczyk R, Zalewski A, Jędrzejewska B, Ansorge H, Bunevich AN (2009) Reproduction and mortality of invasive raccoon dogs (nyctereutes procyonoides) in the Białowieża Primeval Forest (Eastern Poland). Ann Zool Fenn 46(4):291–301, 211. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5735/086.046.0406
Kuznetsova A (2020) Package ‘lmerTest’ (Version 3.1–3). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/lmerTest.pdf
Lavrov N (1971) Results of raccoon dog introductions in different parts of the Soviet Union. Tr Kafedry Biol MGZPI 29:101–160
Malinowski R, Lewiński S, Rybicki M, Gromny E, Günther S, Jenerowicz M et al (2019) Sentinel-2 global land cover project - final report. Retrieved from http://users.cbk.waw.pl/~mkrupinski/S2GLC_Phase2_FinalReport.pdf
Malinowski R, Lewiński S, Rybicki M, Gromny E, Jenerowicz M, Krupiński M et al (2020) Automated production of a land cover/use map of Europe based on sentinel-2 imagery. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213523
Mangiafico SS (2016) Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R, version 1.18.8. What are least square means? https://rcompanion.org/handbook/G_05.html. Accessed 27 May 2021
Manly B, McDonald L, Thomas D (1993) Resource Selection by Animals. Statistical Design and Analysis for Field Studies, Chapman & Hall, London
McMahon BJ, Doyle S, Gray A, Kelly SBA, Redpath SM, Dhanjal-Adams K (2020) European bird declines: do we need to rethink approaches to the management of abundant generalist predators? J Appl Ecol 57(10):1885–1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13695
Melis C, Herfindal I, Dahl F, Åhlén P-A (2015) Individual and temporal variation in habitat association of an alien carnivore at its invasion front. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0122492. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122492
Merrill SB, Mech DL (2003) The usefulness of GPS telemetry to study wolf circadian and social activity. Wildl Soc Bull 31(4):947–960. https://doi.org/10.2307/3784439
Miljøstyrelsen (2017) Handlingsplan mod invasive arter. Retrieved from https://mst.dk/media/143350/handlingsplan_invasive-arter_juni17.pdf
Miljøstyrelsen (2020) Forvaltningsplan for mink, mårhund og vaskebjørn. Retrieved from https://mst.dk/media/191343/netversion-miljoestyrelsen_forvaltningsplan_2020-mink-maarhund-og-vaskebjoern.pdf
Mulder J (2013) The raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) in the Netherlands - Its present status and a risk assessment. Lutra 56:23–43
Mustonen A-M, Asikainen J, Kauhala K, Paakkonen T, Nieminen P (2007) Seasonal rhythms of body temperature in the free-ranging raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) with special emphasis on winter sleep. Chronobiol Int 24(6):1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520701797999
Mustonen A-M, Lempiäinen T, Aspelund M, Hellstedt P, Ikonen K, Itämies J et al (2012) Application of change-point analysis to determine winter sleep patterns of the raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) from body temperature recordings and a multi-faceted dietary and behavioral study of wintering. BMC Ecol 12(1):27–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-12-27
Naturstyrelsen SO (2010) Indsatsplan mod mårhund i Danmark. Retrieved from https://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/Attachments/Endeligudgaveafindsatsplanmodmrhund.pdf
Noonan MJ, Fleming CH, Akre TS, Drescher-Lehman J, Gurarie E, Harrison A-L et al (2019) Scale-insensitive estimation of speed and distance traveled from animal tracking data. Mov Ecol 7(1):35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0177-1
Ogurtsov S, Zheltukhin S, Kotlov I (2018) Daily activity patterns of large and medium-sized mammals based on camera traps data in the central forest nature reserve, Valdai Upland, Russia. Nat Conserv Res. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2018.031
Owen-Smith N, Goodall V (2014) Coping with savanna seasonality: comparative daily activity patterns of African ungulates as revealed by GPS telemetry. J Zool 293(3):181–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.12132
Pagh S, Chriél M (2017) Mårhund - risikovurdering, biologi og erfaringsgrundlag for en “best practice” i forhold til regulering. Retrieved from https://mst.dk/media/146156/mst-maarhund-risikovurdering-biologi-og-erfaringsgrundlag-for-en-best-practice-i-forhold-til-regulering-130218.pdf
Pagh S, Pertoldi C, Chriél M, Hansen MS (2020) Ræve og mårhunde kan regulere antallet af hvalpe. [Foxes and raccoon dogs can regulate their number of pups]. Aktuel Naturvidenskab 2:31–35
Palomares F, Delibes M (1993) Determining activity types and budgets from movement speed of radio-marked mongooses. J Wildl Manage 57(1):164–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809013
Qiang W, Murase T, Tsubota T (2003) Seasonal changes in spermatogenesis and testicular steroidogenesis in wild male raccoon dogs (nyctereutes procynoides). J Vet Med Sci 65(10):1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.65.1087
Rowcliffe MJ, Carbone C, Kays R, Kranstauber B, Jansen PA (2012) Bias in estimating animal travel distance: the effect of sampling frequency. Methods Ecol Evol 3(4):653–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00197.x
Rudert S, Brown JL, Gansloßer U, Möbius G, Songsasen N (2011) Activity pattern, reproductive behaviors and gonadal hormones in the raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides). Zoo Biol 30(2):134–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/zoo.20315
Saeki M, Johnson PJ, Macdonald DW (2007) Movements and habitat selection of raccoon dogs (nyctereutes procyonoides) in a mosaic landscape. J Mammal 88(4):1098–1111. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-mamm-a-208r1.1
Salewski V, Schmidt L (2019) The raccoon dog - an important nest predator of black-tailed godwit in northern Germany. Wader Study 126(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.18194/ws.00143
Schwemmer P, Weiel S, Garthe S (2021) Spatio-temporal movement patterns and habitat choice of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and racoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides) along the Wadden Sea coast. Eur J Wildl Res 67(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-021-01474-6
Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildl Manage 63(2):739–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802664
Seki Y, Koganezawa M (2011) Factors influencing winter home ranges and activity patterns of raccoon dogs Nyctereutes procyonoides in a high-altitude area of Japan. Acta Theriol 56(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-010-0020-y
Sennhenn-Reulen H, Diedhiou L, Klapproth M, Zinner D (2017) Estimation of baboon daily travel distances by means of point sampling - the magnitude of underestimation. Primate Biol 4(2):143–151. https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-143-2017
Sidorovich V, Polozov AG, Lauzhel GO, Krasko DA (2000a) Dietary overlap among generalist carnivores in relation to the impact of the introduced racoon dog nyctereutes procyonoides on native predators in northern Belarus. Z Saeugetierkd 65:271–285. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/192442
Sidorovich V, Polozov AG, Lauzhel GO, Krasko DA (2000b) Dietary overlap among generalist carnivores in relation to the impact of the introduced racoon dog nyctereutes procyonoides on native predators in northern Belarus. Zeitschrift Fur Saugetierkunde 65:271–285
Süld K, Saarma U, Valdmann H (2017) Home ranges of raccoon dogs in managed and natural areas. PLoS ONE 12(3):e0171805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171805
Sutor A, Kauhala K, Ansorge H (2010) Diet of the raccoon dog Nyctereutes procyonoides — a canid with an opportunistic foraging strategy. Acta Theriol 55(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.4098/j.at.0001-7051.035.2009
Sutor A, Schwarz S (2012) Home ranges of raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides, Gray, 1834) in Southern Brandenburg, Germany. Eur J Wildl Res 58(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-011-0546-6
Sutor A, Schwarz S (2013) Seasonal habitat selection of raccoon dogs (nyctereutes procyonoides) in Southern Brandenburg, Germany. Folia Zool 62(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i3.a10.2013
Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement: measuring and modeling population redistribution in animals and plants. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Union E (2017) Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2017/1263. Off J Eur Union L182:37–39
Viksne J, Janaus M, Mednis A (2011) Factors influencing the number of breeding water birds in Lake Engure, Latvia. Proc Latv Acad Sci 65(5–6):127. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10046-011-0028-y
Ward OG, Wurster-Hill DH (1990) Nyctereutes procyonoides. Mamm Species 358:1–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504213
Watabe R, Saito MU (2022) Winter weather conditions result in temporal niche overlap among three sympatric medium-sized carnivores in northeastern Japan. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 76(12):164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03271-w
Zoller H, Drygala F (2013) Activity patterns of the invasive raccoon dog (nyctereutes procyonoides) in North East Germany. Folia Zool 62(4):290–296, 297. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25225/fozo.v62.i4.a6.2013
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mariann Chriél from the Danish Ministry of the Environment for allowing access to telemetry data of monitored raccoon dogs.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Aarhus Universitet The study was funded by the Danish Ministry of Environment. JCS further considers this work a contribution to his VILLUM Investigator project “Biodiversity Dynamics in a Changing World” funded by VILLUM FONDEN (grant 16549) and to Center for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), funded by Danish National Research Foundation. (grant DNRF173).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualisation: Brittany Wooldridge, Jens-Christian Svenning, Sussie Pagh. Data curation: Brittany Wooldridge. Formal analysis: Brittany Wooldridge, with advice from Sussie Pagh and Jens-Christian Svenning. Investigation: Brittany Wooldridge. Methodology: Brittany Wooldridge, Jens-Christian Svenning, Sussie Pagh. Project administration: Sussie Pagh. Writing – original draft: Brittany Wooldridge, with feedback from Sussie Pagh and Jens-Christian Svenning.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
No ethical approval was required from an institutional or national ethics review board. The study complies with current Danish Laws, as a part of the of the regular surveillance and culling of raccoon dogs in Denmark by the Danish Ministry of the Environment. This study did not include the trapping, collaring, or handling of animals.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix A – Habitat selection
Methodology
Statistical modelling
Variable descriptions
Linear mixed effect models were built for each habitat type to determine if there were significant shifts in habitat selection between the seasons (Table 3). The response variable, Selection Index (SI) associated with each habitat type was represented as a continuous variable, and the two predictor variables; Season (fixed effect) and ID (random effect) as categorical. The ID variable represented the identification number of each individual, as the categorical random intercept to account for individuals being observed across more than one season.
In the case where model fit improved, Season was included as a random slope in addition to the ID random intercept, to account for the variation of impact Season may have on the Selection Index according to each individual.
Model selection
To determine which random effect structure fit the data best, models with different random effect structures were compared to one another by examining their Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) values and the model with the lower AIC value was determined to have the better random effect structure. To determine if each fixed effect term contributed to explaining variation in the response variable, an Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II) was developed by using the Anova function on the full mixed effect model. Each model’s AIC and coefficient of determination (conditional & marginal R2) values were examined when comparing models. Residuals of each model were examined and if assumptions of normality were not met, the response variable was transformed.
Results
Appendix B – Travel speed
Methodology
Summarisation of the three different datasets corresponding to different interfix times (10 min, 1 hr, 3 hrs):
10 minutes:
-
Lowest overall sample size of the three datasets (Table 6)
-
Data is evenly spread throughout the day (Table 8)
-
Data is not evenly spread throughout the year (only includes data for months Jan, Apr, Jul & Oct) (Tables 7 and 9)
1 hour:
-
Second highest overall sample size of the three datasets (Table 6)
-
Data is not evenly spread throughout the day, with the majority of fixes being collected during hours 04, 05, & 06 (Table 8)
-
Data is evenly spread throughout the year, with the majority of fixes being collected during hours 04, 05, 06 across all 12 months (Tables 7 and 9)
3 hours:
-
Highest overall sample size of the three datasets (Table 6)
-
Data is relatively evenly spread throughout the day, with the majority of fixes being collected every 3 hours (Table 8)
-
Data is relatively evenly spread throughout the time of year, with the majority of fixes being collected every 3 h consistently throughout the 12 months, with the exception of the summer months (Apr-Sep) where data was not collected during hour 04 (Tables 7 and 9)
Time of day between Seasons
Due to sampling constraints, the decision to use the 10-min IT dataset for this analysis was straight forward as this was the only dataset with consistent data throughout the day at hourly intervals.
Habitat type
Given the higher sample sizes of the 1-hour and 3-hour IT datasets, the results of these two datasets were compared to observe any differences. The results from the 3-h IT dataset were most similar to those of the habitat selection analysis performed in this study with slower speeds corresponding to habitats that were selected for and higher speeds corresponding to habitats that were avoided.
Statistical modelling
Variable descriptions
The response variable, Speed (m/h), was represented as a continuous variable, and the three predictor variables; Hour, Season and Habitat were represented as categorical. Hour was represented by each hour of the day, Season by the four seasons and Habitat by ten unique habitat types. The Speed variable was log10 transformed for all models. The random effect structure consists of the categorical variable ID which represents the identification number of each individual raccoon dog, and the categorical variable Year which represents the years that the observations took place. This random effect structure controls for the fact that speed measurements taken from each individual raccoon dog are not independent, and that individuals monitored in the same year may show similar movement patterns to one another. The variable ID is nested within Year as individuals were monitored over several years but not all individuals were monitored over every single year.
Model selection
To determine which random effect structure fit the data best, models with different random effect structures were compared to one another by examining their AIC values and the model with the lower AIC value was determined to have the better random effect structure. To determine if each fixed effect term contributed to explaining variation in the response variable, an Analysis of Deviance Table (Type II) was developed by using the Anova function on the full mixed effect model. If a model term was insignificant, starting with the interaction terms, it was removed from the model, and the anova function was applied to the old and reduced model together to determine which model was a better fit. Each model’s AIC and coefficient of determination (conditional & marginal R2) values were examined when comparing models.
Results
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wooldridge, B., Svenning, JC. & Pagh, S. Habitat selection and movement patterns of the Raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in Denmark using GPS telemetry data. Eur J Wildl Res 70, 64 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01803-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01803-5