Abstract
It has been over half a century since cellular senescence was first noted and characterized, and yet no consensus senescent marker has been reliably established. This challenge is compounded by the complexity and heterogenic phenotypes of senescent cells. This necessitates the use of multiple biomarkers to confidently characterise senescent cells. Despite cytochemical staining of senescence associated-beta-galactosidase being a single marker approach, as well as being time and labour-intensive, it remains the most popular detection method. We have developed an alternative flow cytometry-based method that simultaneously quantifies multiple senescence markers at a single-cell resolution. In this study, we applied this assay to the quantification of both replicative and induced senescent primary cells. Using this assay, we were able to quantify the activity level of SA β-galactosidase, the expression level of p16INK4a and γH2AX in these cell populations. Our results show this flow cytometric approach to be sensitive, robust, and consistent in discriminating senescent cells in different cell senescence models. A strong positive correlation between these commonly- used senescence markers was demonstrated. The method described in this paper can easily be scaled up to accommodate high-throughput screening of senescent cells in applications such as therapeutic cell preparation, and in therapy-induced senescence following cancer treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Emerging evidence suggests that the accumulation of senescent cells in tissues and organs may underlie ageing and age-related diseases (Krishnamurthy et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2007; Yanai and Fraifeld 2018). For instance, accumulation of senescent cells has been reported in ageing primate, rodent, and human tissues (Dimri et al. 1995; Herbig et al. 2006; van Deursen 2014). This has also been observed in age-related diseases such as type 2 diabetes (T2DM), musculoskeletal disorders, and neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases (Muñoz-Espín and Serrano 2014; Olivieri et al. 2018). Several studies have suggested a correlation between the proliferation potential of mesenchymal stem cells and the age of donors (Choudhery et al. 2014; Stolzing et al. 2008; Virant-Klun et al. 2019). Furthermore, cells derived from Werner syndrome patients exhibit premature senescence in comparison to cells from age-matched healthy individuals (Cheung et al. 2014). Rapidly accumulating evidence from these studies and others has enhanced our understanding of the role of senescent cells in the ageing process.
Of course, cellular senescence is no doubt an essential cellular process that modulates various aspects of life such as tumour suppression, wounding healing, and embryonic development (Chuprin et al. 2013; Coppé et al. 2008; Demaria et al. 2014). However, the detrimental effects of senescent cells have also been reported in age-related diseases. Recent findings show that senescent cells can negatively impact their immediate microenvironment through the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Coppé et al. 2010; Ovadya and Krizhanovsky 2014). It is also known that through these secreted proteins, senescent cells may have a stimulatory effect on tumour cell proliferation and migration (Coppé et al. 2010). Several lines of evidence suggest clear health benefits of reducing the accumulation of senescent cells. Such benefits include delayed onset of age-related diseases, the extension of healthspan (length of time lived in good health), and enhanced cardiac stress tolerance (Xu et al. 2015; Roos et al. 2016; Baker et al. 2016). This observation suggests senescent cells could be a promising therapeutic target for age-related degenerative diseases, and in enhancing healthy ageing. Thus, developing sensitive and precise detection methodology as well as being able to quantify senescent cells in an easy-to-perform assay would enhance research and translational studies.
The complexity and heterogeneity of senescence make it challenging to develop a universal biomarker for precise identification and quantification of senescent cells. Currently, the senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) staining at pH 6.0 (Dimri et al. 1995) remains the widely used method to measure senescence. Increased SA-β-Gal activity is reported in replicative and stress-induced senescence in various cell types (Debacq-Chainiaux et al. 2009). Despite its wide applications, the assay is plagued with limitations such as confluency (Severino et al. 2000), serum starvation (Yegorov et al. 1998), time-consuming, and operator bias. These limitations can potentially increase the likelihood of false-positive results in senescent cell screening. Given the phenotypic heterogeneity of senescent cells, no single marker can reliably identify or quantify senescence. In this study, we have developed a robust flow cytometry-based multiparameter senescence assay that accurately detects and quantifies senescent cells in culture. Our approach combined three biomarkers with two label-free additional markers, that allow rapid, quantitative, and high-throughput detection of senescent cells. We tested this method on induced senescence generated by exposing adult mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial cells, and a cancer cell line to doxorubicin and 5’-Aza- 2 deoxycytidines and on long term cultured cells - replicative senescent cells.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Doxorubicin (Doxo) purchased from Cell Signaling Technology UK (5927); DDAOG (9H-(1,3-Dichloro-9,9-Dimethylacridin-2-One-7-yl) β-d-Galactopyranoside) from ThermoFisher Scientific UK, D6488; Bafilomycin A1 from Fisher Scientific UK, 10295441 and 5’-Aza- 2 deoxycytidines (Aza) from Sigma-Aldrich UK, A3656. All the chemicals were reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a stock solution. Antibodies used were as follows: PerCP-Cy™5.5 Mouse Anti-H2AX (pS139) from BD Biosciences, 564,718; Anti-CDKN2A/p16INK4a [EPR1473] (Phycoerythrin) from Abcam ab209579, and Fixable viability Dye 450 from BD Biosciences UK, 562,247. All flow cytometry buffers BD Perm/Wash (554,723); BD Cytofix/Cytoperm (554,722) were purchased from BD Biosciences.
Cell culture
Three different cell types were used: (a) mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), derived from human dental pulp (DP-MSCs); (b) Blood Outgrowth Endothelial Cells (BOECs) supplied by Dr. Joris Braspenning at University Hospital of Würzburg and Prof. Antonia Follenzi at Università del Piemonte Orientale; (c) human glioblastoma cell line – U373 MG purchased from European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC). MSCs were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Sigma-Aldrich UK UK) supplemented with 10% of Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) in standard condition (37 °C with 5% CO2). BOECs were grown under standard conditions in medium provided by Dr. Joris Braspenning at the University Hospital of Würzburg. U373 was cultured in modified Eagle’s medium-α (MEM-α) (Gibco 12,561,056; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Gibco 12,483,040; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Senescence induction
Senescence was induced by exposure of proliferating cells to either 200 nM Doxorubicin (Doxo) or 5 µM of 5’-Aza- 2 deoxycytidines (5-Aza) dissolved in DMSO for 48 h. Control samples were treated with equal molar DMSO in parallel with the treated cells. The cells were washed with PBS following incubation with the drugs or DMSO and cultured with fresh drug -free media for an additional 5 days before determining senescence level. All experiments were replicated and performed with appropriate controls.
Cytochemical detection of SA-β-Gal
The SA-β-Gal activity was detected using a cytochemical approach according to (Dimri et al. 1995). Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated overnight in fresh SA-β-gal staining solution containing 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-Dgalactopyranoside, 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 0.1 m phosphate buffer, pH 6.0 in darkness at 37 °C without CO2. For positive staining controls, fixed cells were treated with the same solution, but at pH 4.0, alongside with the experimental samples. Staining and imaging were done on a Leica optical microscope.
Flow cytometric detection of SA-β-Gal using DDAOG substrate
In the presence of βGal, DDAOG substrate is hydrolysed to DDAO, which generates a far-red fluorescent signal. The staining protocol was adopted from Gong and colleagues with slight modifications (Gong et al. 2009). Briefly, cells were seeded into culture flasks (BD FALCON) cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS for 24 h and subsequently treated with 0.1 µM Bafilomycin A1 to induce lysosomal alkalinisation and 0.02 mM DDAOG for 2 h at 37 °C. Cells were washed twice in PBS, detached by TryplE (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) at 37 °C for 5 min for harvesting. The cells were stained for viability with a fixable viability dye (FV450; 1:1000) in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. They were then washed with 1× BD Wash buffer, followed by a 5-min centrifugation at 300×g before surface marker staining. Cells were then permeabilised and fixed with 200 µl BD Cytofix/Cytoperm solution for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, the cells were washed twice in 1× BD Perm/Wash buffer before intracellular staining with antibodies. A 5 µl/sample of PerCP-Cy™5.5 Mouse Anti-H2AX (pS139 BD Biosciences) and 1:500 Anti-CDKN2A/p16INK4a (EPR1473, Abcam, ab209579) antibody was added and incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Cells were washed twice in 1× BD Perm/Wash buffer prior to analysis on BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (Beckton Dickinson, BD Bioscience).
Data acquisition and analysis
Flow cytometry experiments were performed on BD FACSCanto II at the Centre for Biological Engineering, Loughborough University; data was analysed in FlowJo V10. After appropriate spectral compensation was performed, a minimum of 10,000 events per replicate was collected for analysis. Three replicates for each condition were analysed in each independent experiment and included an appropriate Fluorescence Minus One control (FMO). The data was expressed as the percentage of the total cell population that was positive for a given biomarker.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was extracted from senescent and proliferating cells using Direct-zol RNA Kits with in-column DNAse I treatment (Zymo Research, R2072) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA concentration was determined on a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) at an absorbance ratio of 260/280 nm, with an acceptable range of 1.9 to 2.2 applied. The quality was assessed on Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and only samples with RIN of 9 or above were used for cDNA synthesis. cDNA was generated from 1 µg of the isolated RNA using a SensiFast cDNA synthesis kit (Bioline, BIO-65,053) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Quantitative real-time PCR
The expression of senescence-associated genes (p16, p53, Ki-67, and p21) was analysed. Primer sequences used for the qPCR experiment are listed in Table 1 of the supplementary data. All qPCR experiments were performed on Step one Plus (Applied Biosystems) with SYBR Green detection chemistry. Each reaction contains 5 µl of 10-fold diluted cDNA, 7.5 µl of 2x SensiFast SYBR mix, 0.5 µM of each primer, and 1 µl nuclease-free water in a final reaction volume of 15 µl. The cycling parameters were: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s, followed by a melt curve. The amplification of the expected PCR product was confirmed with a single peak melting curve for each primer set. A standard curve of cDNA serial dilutions was generated to determine amplification efficiency for each primer set. All reactions were performed in four replicates and normalised to 36B4 expression. The 2−△△Ct method (Wong and Medrano 2005) was used to calculate the relative expression level of each gene against the housekeeping gene 36B4.
Immunophenotyping and BOECs tube formation
Cells were tested for the expression of specific surface markers by flow cytometry, using the MSCs phenotyping kit (Miltenyi Biotec). This kit consists of two antibody cocktails: phenotyping (CD73-APC, CD90-FITC, CD105-PE, and CD34/CD45/CD14/CD20-PerCP) as an isotype control cocktail. Briefly, MSCs (5 × 105 cells) were suspended in staining buffer consisting of 2 mM EDTA and 3% FBS in PBS and incubated for 10 min at 4 °C with either phenotype or isotype antibody cocktails. Data was acquired with the BD FACSCanto™ II (BD Biosciences) flow cytometer and analysed using Flowjo software version 10 (Flowjo). A compensation matrix was generated using single antibodies from the kit. Doublets were excluded using FSA vs. FSH gating for all samples before gating on total live cells, negative for 450 viability dye (BD Biosciences). For BOECs, anti-human monoclonal antibodies used included: anti-CD45-PE, anti-CD34-PE (ImmunoTools), anti-CD31-APC (ImmunoTools), anti-Tie2-PE and anti-VE-Cadherin-PE (all other antibodies from Miltenyi Biotec). For BOECs angiogenesis, cells were cultured on Cultrex PathClear Basement Membrane Extract (Biotechne) at 37 °C for 16 h. Evidence of tube-forming ability exhibited by the cells was captured via microscope imaging.
Multiplex ELISA assay
The secretion of IL8, IL6, and MCP1 proteins in the culture medium was measured using Luminex technology according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D Systems). The culture medium was collected for each condition prior to senescence detection. Samples were centrifuged at 300×g for 5 min, and the supernatant was stored at − 80 °C until analysis. Samples were diluted 1:3 in PBS buffer and used at a volume of 100 µl/well in triplicates for each condition. Data acquisition was performed on a Luminex Magpix instrument; data was normalised to cell number for each condition.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was repeated at least three times unless otherwise stated in the figure legends. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, as indicated with asterisks in the figures. All statistical analysis and graph plotting were conducted in GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Results
We began by characterising the cells used in this study and examining their senescence phenotypes according to the three senescence models applied. Analysis of replicative senescence (model 1) was performed on long-term cultured cells at passages 3–5 (early), 10–13 (intermediate) and 22–30 (late) in DP-MSCs. For induced senescence, proliferating DP-MSCs, BOECs and U373 at early passage were treated with either Doxo (model 2) or Aza (model 3) for 48 h before analysis.
Characterisation of cultured cells
The DP-MSCs displayed spindle-shaped morphology under standard growing conditions, as expected of mesenchymal stem cells. Flow cytometric analysis of surface antigens revealed that over 95% of the cells positively expressed CD73, CD90, and CD105 antigens (Supplementary material Fig. S1–c). The cells did not express haematopoietic lineage markers: CD14, CD20, CD34 and CD45 (Supplementary material Fig. S1d). The results confirmed the DP-MSCs used in this study as mesenchymal stem cells.
BOECs were characterised for several endothelial and haematopoietic markers by flow cytometry. They expressed endothelial marker CD31 and VE-Cadherin (Supplementary material Fig. S1, Table C). As expected, no expression of the haematopoietic marker CD45 was found (Supplementary material Fig. S1, Table C). We also observed very low percentages of CD34+ and Tie-2+ in the BOECs. Besides, the cells displayed typical endothelial cobblestone-like morphology in culture and formed tube-like structures when differentiated on an extracellular matrix (left lower panel in supplementary material Fig. S1). Taken together, these results we confirmed that the BOECs are of endothelial lineage.
Accumulation of senescent cells in long-term cultured MSCs
MSCs from three healthy individuals were maintained under standard medium until their proliferation rate significantly reduced. As expected, distinctive growth kinetics and progression toward the Hayflick limit for each sample were seen (Fig. 1a). We assessed the degree of senescence in this culture at three timepoints defined here as early, intermediate, and late passage based on their growth kinetics. Population doubling rate at these time points was significantly different between early and intermediate; early and late; and intermediate and late passage (Kruskal-Wallis test p < 0.001), confirming a decline in proliferation potential over time in culture.
The SA β galactosidase activity showed intense blue staining of lysosomal β galactosidase at later passages compared to the early stage (Fig. 1c). To quantify this activity, the number of SA-β-Gal positive (blue) cells versus the total number of cells in at least eight images per condition were counted manually. The percentage of SA-β-Gal positive cells indicates the level of SA-β-Gal activity in the cell population. The result confirms the accumulation of senescent cells with prolonged in vitro culture, peaking at late passage stage (Fig. 1b).
Flow cytometric analysis of senescent cells
Next, we applied our flow cytometry multiparameter senescence assay to detect and quantify senescence in MSCs from seven different donors at early, intermediate, and late passages based on our previous grouping criteria from the growth kinetics. The SA-β-Gal activity was detected using the DDAOG substrate at 660 nm (APC channel) alongside with p16INK4a (p16) and γH2AX on PE and PECy7 channel respectively. Dead cells and debris were excluded from the analysis based on fixable viability dye FV450 staining and their light scatter feature. The gating strategy (Supplementary material Fig. S2) for identifying senescent cells was defined using the fluorescent minus one control for each marker (dye) as a benchmark. At least ten thousand viable cells were analysed per condition along with appropriate controls. Results obtained with cytochemical X-gal staining (Fig. 1b, c and e) were confirmed with the DDAOG staining by flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 2a). The percentage of cells expressing SA-β-Gal significantly increased over time in culture and the numbers in both assays were very similar. We also detected significantly elevated amounts of p16INK4a and γH2AX, peaking in cells at the late passage (Fig. 2b and c). Notably, a strong positive correlation was found between cells expressing p16 and SA-β-Gal (R = 0.896, p < 0.001, Fig. 2d); γH2AX and SA-β-Gal (R = 0.88, p < 0.001, Fig. 2e); and γH2AX and p16 (R = 0.96, p < 0.001, Fig. 2f). This strong positive correlation suggests that an increase in one marker would generate a similar directional effect of a fixed proportion in the other marker.
From the flow data generated, additional senescence phenotypes can be readily assessed. For instance, we were able to estimate the cell size from the geometric mean of FSC vs. SSC. There is ample evidence that suggests a positive correlation between cell size and ageing in samples ranging from yeasts to mammalian cells (De Paiva et al. 2006). We observed via microscopy that the cell size at later passages was larger than at the earlier stage. This observation was confirmed by the cell size data extrapolated from our flow cytometer data (Supplementary material Fig. S3). Taken together, these observations confirmed the senescence level to be higher in the long-term cultured cells and hereafter refer to the late passage sample that has been in the replicative senescence stage.
Furthermore, we were able to discriminate the level of senescence in another cell type (BOECs) between early and late passage by using the same flow cytometry panel. Significantly higher SA-β-Gal expression was detected in cells at late passage compared to those at the early stage (Supplementary material Fig. S4a). We also observed significant differences in p16 and γH2AX expression between the early and late passaged BOECs (Supplementary material Fig. S4b, c). Interestingly, a similar strong positive correlation was seen between the markers (Supplementary material Fig. S4d–f) as observed in the MSCs. This result corroborates our findings with the stem cells and showed the markers as robust for senescence detection in BOECs as well as in MSCs.
Induction of senescence by doxorubicin
To further examine the application of this flow cytometry senescence detection panel, senescence was induced by Doxorubicin (Doxo) in three different cell types: mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial, and astrocyte cancer cell line. Actively dividing cells at early passages were treated with Doxo and cultured for an additional 5 days in fresh medium without Doxo. We observed a noticeable alteration in the cellular morphology of treated cells. The cells were enlarged and less defined in shape when compared to the non-treated cells (Supplementary material Fig. S5) on day 7, post-treatment. An increased level of SA-β-Gal activity, p16 expression and γH2AX expression were observed in Doxo-treated in comparison to non-treated cells. This result confirms the successful induction of senescence in MSCs (Fig. 3a), BOCEs (Fig. 3b), and U373 (Fig. 3c) cells by Doxo treatment.
Induction of senescence by 5′-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine
We proceeded to examine our last model for senescence induction and the consistency of the three biomarkers. Using a global DNA demethylase agent, senescence was induced in MSCs, BOECs, and U373. For this purpose, proliferating cells were treated with 5′-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AZA-dC), an FDA-approved anti-cancer drug (Ades and Metzger-Filho 2012) as described in the method section and screened for the presence of senescent cells post-treatment. To confirm whether Aza treatment could induce cellular senescence in MSCs, BOECs, and U373 cells, we investigated the phenotypic changes in these cells 5 days post-treatment. There was a noticeable morphological difference, the treated cells looked enlarged and flattened in shape (Fig. 4 -lower panel) when compared with the non-treated cells (Fig. 4 -upper panel). This observation mirrors morphological changes attributed to senescence, suggesting that the Aza treatment-induced senescence in these cells.
We then assessed SA-β-Gal activity using our flow cytometry-based approach as described in the previous section. A significantly higher SA-β-Gal activity was recorded in Aza treated samples than in the control for the three cell types (Fig. 3d–f). Also, the expression levels of p16 and γH2AX were measured in Aza-treated samples, which were significantly higher than in non-treated samples (Fig. 3d–f).
In addition to the three markers presented in this study, the endogenous autofluorescence which is known to accumulate with ageing (Bertolo et al. 2019) was quantified in the flow cytometric data. The autofluorescence signal in the 530/30 filter from treated (Doxo and Aza) MSCs was compared with that of the control. We observed a significantly increased level of autofluorescence in senescent cells in comparison with the control (Supplementary material Fig. S6). This finding is consistent with published studies where an elevated level of endogenous autofluorescence has been reported in senescent cells and tissues (Brunk and Terman 2002; Squirrell et al. 2012). In this study, we showed for the first time that Doxo and Aza induce senescence in BOECs. Notably, BOECs displayed similar senescence phenotypes as seen in MSCs both in the long term cultured and, in the senescence induced cells. We observed the up-regulation of SA-β-Gal, p16 expression, and significantly higher accumulation of DNA damage response in treated samples than in the controls.
Validation of flow cytometric senescence detection approach
Finally, two independent methods were used to confirm the detection of senescence by the flow cytometric assay on the replicative and induced senescent cell samples in addition to previously described cytochemical SA-β-Gal staining. The rationale was to profile two main components associated with senescence: cell cycle arrest and the secretome to confirm induction of senescence in the cells and changes in the level of senescent cells. The first approach was based on the highly sensitive and precise quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) to measure the expression of four well-established senescence biomarkers: p16, p21, Ki-67, and p53. The expression level of the proliferation marker Ki-67 was down-regulated in the replicative (Fig. 5a) and in the induced senescence (Fig. 5d, g), suggesting cell cycle arrest in these cells. In the replicative senescence, our result showed a gradual but steady increase in p16 expression over time in culture (Fig. 5b) and in BOECs (Supplementary material Fig. 7s). We likewise observed an increase in the level of p21 expression in all three senescence models studied (Fig. 5c, e and h). Similarly, the expression level of p53 was up-regulated in the Doxo-induced senescence, but no significant difference was seen between the control and Doxo-treated in the U373 cell line (Fig. 5i), which may suggest p53-independent senescence induction by Doxo in U373. Taken together, these results confirm the induction of senescence in the cells and show concordance with the results from the flow cytometric approach.
The second approach was to measure the expression levels of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) IL6, MCP1 and IL8 in the supernatant of both the Doxo and Aza-induced-senescent MSCs. Results from this experiment showed a significant increase in the expression of IL6, MCP1 and IL8 secreted by Doxo and Aza-treated cells in comparison to the control (Fig. 6).
Discussion
Despite great advancement in our understanding of senescence, a reliable universal biomarker capable of accurately discriminating senescent cells has remained elusive. Thus, a deeper understanding of the biological implications of the senescence phenotype and its therapeutic potentials and risk has been hindered. In this paper, we described a three-colour flow cytometric panel that simultaneously quantifies multiple senescence markers at high throughput. This panel was informed by senescence biomarkers with consistent results from the literature, and a dye that supports detection of SA-β-Gal in living cells but does not interfere with the increasing autofluorescence of senescent cells.
There is now substantial evidence that most of the beneficial effects of MSCs in regenerative medicine stem from the broad repertoire of secreted trophic factors that modulate various functions, such as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulation processes. It is also known that senescent cells secrete a myriad of factors such as growth factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines with potent autocrine and paracrine activities (Coppé et al. 2010). We report significant up-regulation of IL8, IL6, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP1) following senescence induction in MSCs. Notably, these cytokines can exacerbate the inflammation response often associated with age-related diseases (López-Otín et al. 2013). Senescence activation pathways and phenotypes are well documented in the literature as independent of the tissue source and the stressor (Campisi 2013; Fagagna et al. 2003; Fumagalli et al. 2014; Stein et al. 1999). Hence, the similarity in the phenotypes and expression pattern of SA-β-gal, p16 and γH2AX in senescent BOECs with those of MSCs agreed with what is known in the literature. This study adds to our sparse knowledge of BOECs’ senescence and provides a tool to track senescence in BOECs.
In an era of rapidly expanding regenerative medicine applications, mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells play an important role in revolutionising these therapies for diseases. High demand, enthusiasm for regenerative medicine, and regulatory approvals (Shapiro et al. 2019) are positive signals of future increase in the proliferation of cell-based therapies. Recent studies have highlighted the risk associated with senescent cells in cell therapy. For instance, Xu et al. reported osteoarthritis-like condition in the legs of mice transplanted with senescent cells (Xu et al. 2017). In another study, it was shown that transplanting relatively small numbers of senescent cells into the abdomens of young mice was enough to induce systemic disability and disease (Xu et al. 2018). Considering the potential deleterious risks that senescent cells may pose, it is increasingly important to monitor the senescence phenotypes in therapeutic cell preparations. A growing inclination in the field is to include cellular senescence assessment as part of quality control for reliable and reproducible cellular therapy (Turinetto et al. 2016).
Different methods have been proposed and tested to track senescence in the cell population with the goal of detection and quantification (Turinetto et al. 2016). The cumulative population doubling method, for instance, is simple to implement, but its sensitivity in predicting cells approaching a senescent state is limited by factors such as large donor variations, donor age, and cells lost via apoptosis during passaging (Cristofalo et al. 1998). On the other hand, the popular cytochemical staining of SA-β-gal is more robust in detecting enlarged cells (which are usually late senescent cells) but precludes the detection of early senescent cells (Turinetto et al. 2016). Recently, the flow cytometric-based approach is emerging as a fast and reliable method to quantify senescent cells. For instance, in 2017, Althubiti and Macip proposed the use of the extracellular markers to characterise senescent cells (Althubiti and Macip 2017). There have also been fluorescent-based methods for detecting SA-β-Gal, with the advantage of incorporation of other senescent markers and improved sensitivity (Bertolo et al. 2019; Flor et al. 2016; Höhn and Grune 2013). In this study, we proposed a tool to monitor senescence phenotypes in expanding ex vivo cells and in cancer cells by combining the advantages of flow cytometry with the high sensitivity of fluorescence detection.
For SA-β-gal activity detection by flow cytometer, a cell-permeable β-galactosidase DDAOG substrate was chosen instead of the commonly used C12-FDG. DDAOG hydrolyses to DDAO upon cleavage by β-galactosidase, resulting in a far-red fluorescence detectable by most flow cytometers. The choice of DDAOG prevents cellular autofluorescence (AF) cross-talk, a major drawback with using C12-FDG or other fluorogenic substrates such as the SPiDER-βGal in SA-β-Gal detection, which tends to emit at around a 550 nm wavelength (Flor et al. 2016; Höhn and Grune 2013). DDAOG is also a preferred option for detecting SA-β-Gal activity in vivo, as the shift to the far-red fluorescence allows a clear detection against the probe background (Tung et al. 2004). Our approach incorporates the sensitivity and reliability of the DDAOG substrate in senescence detection with other senescent cell biomarkers. Furthermore, the design of the panel allows the signal from the age-related pigment lipofuscin to be captured in a separate channel as an additional data point for senescence detection (Bertolo et al. 2019).
Replicative senescence of mesenchymal stem and endothelial cells was generated from a very early passage by a prolonged culture under standard growing conditions. The developed assay was sensitive enough to discriminate the level of senescence at different passages of culture. Previous studies have demonstrated that senescent cells accumulate in ageing tissues and long-term cultured cells (Angello et al. 1987). This is consistent with our finding that senescent cells accumulate over time in culture. This opens the possibility of using this assay to quantify senescent cell accumulation in cells expanded for therapeutic purposes.
References from the literature indicate that most senescent cells express p16INK4a, which is mostly absent in quiescent and terminally differentiated cells, making it a valuable senescence biomarker (Stein et al. 1999; Zindy et al. 1997). Likewise, senescent cells are known to harbour irreparable DNA damage in their nucleus (Turinetto and Giachino 2015). This finding in this study agrees with previous studies where the accumulation of DNA damage in senescent cells in tissues and organs of older organisms increases (Fumagalli et al. 2014; López-Otín et al. 2013). We demonstrated a strong positive correlation between these markers and SA-β-Gal at a single-cell resolution in both replicative and stress-induced senescence. SA-β-gal activity strongly correlates with the accumulation of DNA damage and p16 expression in both cell types.
The multiparameter flow cytometry assay for senescence detection described in this study can be used to track senescence in living cells based on the DDAOG substrate. It also allows the generation of additional data in a non-intrusive manner. For example, the accumulation of lipofuscin can be estimated in the green channel and the estimation of cell size possible from the flow cytometric data.
Senescence has gained increasing interest from the cancer therapeutic perspective, as a promising strategy to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells. Therapy-induced senescence (TIS) has been reported in cancer cell lines treated with anticancer drugs, as well as in tumour samples from patients exposed to chemotherapy (Braig et al. 2005). A recent study showed an improved outcome when TIS lymphoma cells were eliminated in mice (Dörr et al. 2013). Hence, tools that would allow the identification and quantification of TIS post-treatment are needed. In this study, we showed that the flow cytometric-based senescence detection assay can be used to detect and quantify senescent cells in the U373 human glioblastoma cell line following treatment with anticancer drugs Doxo and Aza. With this tool, it is possible to monitor the senescence level in patients’ cells, such as endothelial cells, following anti-cancer drug treatment.
Our results show that the flow-cytometric method can be used to discriminate a wide variety of senescent cells in actively dividing cell populations as effectively as conventional senescence detection methods. Considering the sensitivity, lower labour, and high throughput platform enabled by flow cytometry, we strongly recommend the flow cytometric- based method for quantifying senescent cells in culture and in ex vivo cells. This method can also be used to enhance high throughput screenings, relevant to senolytic and anti-ageing drug development. Another possible application of this method could entail screening senescent cells from cell-based therapeutic products.
References
Ades F, Metzger-Filho O (2012) Targeting the cellular signaling: BRAF inhibition and beyond for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma. Dermatol Res Pract 2012:9
Althubiti M, Macip S (2017) Detection of senescent cells by extracellular markers using a flow cytometry-based approach. Methods Mol Biol 1534:147
Angello JC, Pendergrass WR, Norwood TH, Prothero J (1987) Proliferative potential of human fibroblasts: an inverse dependence on cell size. J Cell Physiol 132(1):125–130
Baker DJ, Childs BG, Durik M, Wijers ME, Sieben CJ, Zhong J et al (2016) Naturally occurring p16 Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan. Nature 530(7589):184–189
Bertolo A, Baur M, Guerrero J, Pötzel T, Stoyanov J (2019) Autofluorescence is a reliable in vitro marker of cellular senescence in human mesenchymal stromal cells. Sci Rep 9(1):2074–2015
Braig M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, Rudolph C, Peters AH, Schlegelberger B et al (2005) Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development. Nature 436(7051):660–665
Brunk U, Terman A (2002) Lipofuscin: mechanisms of age-related accumulation and influence on cell function. Free Radical Biol Med 33(5):611
Campisi J (2013) Aging, cellular senescence, and cancer. Annu Rev Physiol 75(1):685–705
Chen J, Hales CN, Ozanne SE (2007) DNA damage, cellular senescence and organismal ageing: causal or correlative? Nucleic Acids Res 35(22):7417–7428
Cheung H, Liu X, Canterel-Thouennon L, Li L, Edmonson C, Rennert O (2014) Telomerase protects werner syndrome lineage-specific stem cells from premature aging. Stem Cell Rep 2(4):534–546
Choudhery MS, Badowski M, Muise A, Pierce J, Harris DT (2014) Donor age negatively impacts adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cell expansion and differentiation. J Transl Med 12(1):8
Chuprin A, Gal H, Biron-Shental T, Biran A, Amiel A, Rozenblatt S et al (2013) Cell fusion induced by ERVWE1 or measles virus causes cellular senescence. Genes Dev 27(21):2356–2366
Coppé JP, Patil CK, Rodier F, Sun Y, Muñoz DP, Goldstein J et al (2008) Senescence-associated secretory phenotypes reveal cell-nonautonomous functions of oncogenic RAS and the p53 tumor suppressor. PLoS Biol 6(12):e301
Coppé JP, Desprez P, Krtolica A, Campisi J (2010) The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol 5(1):99–118
Cristofalo VJ, Allen RG, Pignolo RJ, Martin BG, Beck JC (1998) Relationship between donor age and the replicative lifespan of human cells in culture: a reevaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(18):10614
De Paiva CS, Pflugfelder SC, Li D- (2006) Cell size correlates with phenotype and proliferative capacity in human corneal epithelial cells. Stem Cells 24:368
Debacq-Chainiaux F, Erusalimsky JD, Campisi J, Toussaint O (2009) Protocols to detect senescence-associated beta-galactosidase (SA-βgal) activity, a biomarker of senescent cells in culture and in vivo. Nat Protocols 4:1798
Demaria M, Ohtani N, Youssef S, Rodier F, Toussaint W, Mitchell J et al (2014) An essential role for senescent cells in optimal wound healing through secretion of PDGF-AA. Dev Cell 31(6):722–733
Di Fagagna FDA, Reaper F, Clay-Farrace PM, Fiegler L, Carr H, Von Zglinicki P et al (2003) A DNA damage checkpoint response in telomere-initiated senescence. Nature 426(6963):194–198
Dimri GP, Lee X, Basile G, Acosta M, Scott G, Roskelley C et al (1995) A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci PNAS 92(20):9363–9367
Dörr JR, Yu Y, Milanovic M, Beuster G, Zasada C, Däbritz JHM et al (2013) Synthetic lethal metabolic targeting of cellular senescence in cancer therapy. Nature 501(7467):421–425
Flor AC, Doshi AP, Kron SJ (2016) Modulation of therapy-induced senescence by reactive lipid aldehydes. Cell Death Discov 2(1):16045
Fumagalli M, Rossiello F, Mondello C, di Fagagna FA (2014) Stable cellular senescence is associated with persistent ddr activation. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110969
Gong H, Zhang B, Little G, Kovar J, Chen H, Xie W et al (2009) [beta]-Galactosidase activity assay using far-red-shifted fluorescent substrate DDAOG. Anal Biochem 386(1):59
Herbig U, Ferreira M, Condel L, Carey D, Sedivy JM (2006) Cellular senescence in aging primates. Science 311(5765):1257
Höhn A, Grune T (2013) Lipofuscin: formation, effects and role of macroautophagy. Redox Biol 1(1):140–144
Krishnamurthy J, Torrice C, Ramsey MR, Kovalev GI, Al-Regaiey K, Su L et al (2004) Ink4a/Arf expression is a biomarker of aging. J Clin Investig 114(9):1299–1307
López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2013) The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153(6):1194–1217
Muñoz-Espín D, Serrano M (2014) Cellular senescence: from physiology to pathology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15(7):482–496
Olivieri F, Prattichizzo F, Grillari J, Balistreri CR (2018) Cellular senescence and inflammaging in age-related diseases. Mediat Inflamm 2018:9076485–9076486
Ovadya Y, Krizhanovsky V (2014) Senescent cells: SASPected drivers of age-related pathologies. Biogerontology 15(6):627–642
Roos CM, Zhang B, Palmer AK, Ogrodnik MB, Pirtskhalava T, Thalji NM et al (2016) Chronic senolytic treatment alleviates established vasomotor dysfunction in aged or atherosclerotic mice. Aging Cell 15(5):973–977
Severino J, Allen RG, Balin S, Balin A, Cristofalo VJ (2000) Is β-galactosidase staining a marker of senescence in vitro and in vivo? Exp Cell Res 257(1):162–171
Shapiro SA, Smith CG, Arthurs JR, Master Z (2019) Preparing regenerative therapies for clinical application: proposals for responsible translation. Regen Med 14(2):77–84
Squirrell JM, Fong JJ, Ariza CA, Mael A, Meyer K, Shevde NK et al (2012) Endogenous fluorescence signatures in living pluripotent stem cells change with loss of potency. PLoS ONE 7(8):e43708
Stein GH, Drullinger LF, Soulard A, Dulic V (1999) Differential roles for cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p21 and p16 in the mechanisms of senescence and differentiation in human fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 19(3):2109–2117
Stolzing A, Jones E, McGonagle D, Scutt A (2008) Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells:consequences for cell therapies. Mech Ageing Dev 129(3):163–173
Tung C-, Zeng Q, Shah K, Kim D-, Schellingerhout D, Weissleder R (2004) In vivo imaging of Β-galactosidase activity using far red fluorescent switch. Cancer Res 64:1579
Turinetto V, Giachino C (2015) Multiple facets of histone variant H2AX: a DNA double-strand-break marker with several biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res 43(5):2489–2498
Turinetto V, Vitale E, Giachino C (2016) Senescence in human mesenchymal stem cells: functional changes and implications in stem cell-based therapy. Int J Mol Sci 17(7):1164
van Deursen JM (2014) The role of senescent cells in ageing. Nature 509(7501):439–446
Virant-Klun I, Omejec S, Stimpfel M, Skerl P, Novakovic S, Jancar N et al (2019) Female age affects the mesenchymal stem cell characteristics of aspirated follicular cells in the in vitro fertilization programme. Stem Cell Rev Rep 15(4):543–557
Wong ML, Medrano JF (2005) Real-time PCR for mRNA quantitation. Biotechniques 39(1):75–85
Xu M, Palmer AK, Ding H, Weivoda MM, Pirtskhalava T, White TA et al (2015) Targeting senescent cells enhances adipogenesis and metabolic function in old age. eLife 4:e12997
Xu M, Bradley EW, Weivoda MM, Hwang SM, Pirtskhalava T, Decklever T et al (2017) Transplanted senescent cells induce an osteoarthritis-like condition in mice. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 72(6):780–785
Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN, Weigand BM, Palmer AK, Weivoda MM et al (2018) Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age. Nat Med 24(8):1246–1256
Yanai H, Fraifeld VE (2018) The role of cellular senescence in aging through the prism of Koch-like criteria. Ageing Res Rev 41:18–33
Yegorov YE, Akimov SS, Hass R, Zelenin AV, Prudovsky IA (1998) Endogenous β-galactosidase activity in continuously nonproliferating cells. Exp Cell Res 243(1):207–211
Zindy F, Quelle DE, Roussel MF, Sherr CJ (1997) Expression of the p16INK4a tumor suppressor versus other INK4 family members during mouse development and aging. Oncogene 15(2):203–211
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Joris Braspenning at University Hospital of Würzburg and Prof. Antonia Follenzi at Università del Piemonte Orientale for providing BOECs and medium.
Funding
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No. 667421.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ABA and AS conceived the experiments. ABA designed and performed the experiments with DT Help with BOCEs by AF. The Data was analysed by ABA and DT Manuscript – drafted by ABA, reviewed and edited by ABA; DT and AS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Adewoye, A.B., Tampakis, D., Follenzi, A. et al. Multiparameter flow cytometric detection and quantification of senescent cells in vitro. Biogerontology 21, 773–786 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-020-09893-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-020-09893-9