Abstract
Several economic reviews demonstrate the substantial costs related to climate change and consequently call for early action. These reviews, however, have been limited to measuring ‘objective’ risks and expected material damage related to climate change. The ‘subjective’ perceived risk of climate change and society’s willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid these risks are expected to provide an important additional motivation for direct action. We investigate whether and why air travel passengers—an increasingly important source of greenhouse gas emissions—are supportive of measures that increase the cost of their travel based on the polluter pays principle and compensate the damage caused by their flight. Compared to the results of the few previous studies that have elicited WTP estimates for climate policy more generally, our results appear to be at the lower end of the scale, while a comparison to estimates of the social cost of carbon shows that the average WTP estimate in this study is close to the estimated marginal damage cost. Although significant differences are found between travellers from Europe, North America, Asia and the rest of the world, we show that there exists a substantial demand for climate change mitigation action. The positive risk premium over and above the expected property damage cost assessments should be accounted for more explicitly in economic reviews as it will add to the burden of proof of direct action. Measurements of passenger WTP will help policy makers to design effective financial instruments aimed at discouraging climate-unfriendly travel activities as well as to generate funds for the measures directed at climate change mitigation and adaptation. Based on stated WTP by travellers to offset their greenhouse gas emissions, funds in the order of magnitude of €23 billion could be generated annually to finance climate change mitigation activities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alberini A (1995) Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models. J Environ Econ Manage 29:169–180
Arrow KJ (2007) Global climate change: a challenge to policy. The Economists’ Voice 4(3):2
Arrow KJ, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58(10):4601–4614 January 15
Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK
Bateman IJ, Brouwer R, Hanley N, Georgiou S, Machado M, Mourato S, Saunders C (2005) A ‘natural experiment’ approach to contingent valuation of private and public UV health risk reduction strategies in low and high risk Countries. Environ Resour Econ 31:47–72
BBC (2007) Global public opinion survey on climate change. Web reference (10/12/2007): http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/02_11_07bbcclimatesurvey.pdf
Beck U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage London
Boon B, Davidson M, Faber J, van Velzen A (2007) Allocation of allowances for aviation in the EU ETS. CE Delft, Delft, The Netherlands
Cairns S, Newson C (2006) Predict and decide: aviation, climate change and UK policy. Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford, UK
Cameron TA (2001) Updating subjective risks in the presence of conflicting information: an application to climate change. J Risk Uncertain 30(1):63–97
Cameron TA (2005) Individual option prices for climate change mitigation. J Public Econ 89:283–301
Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD (1986) Valuing environmental goods: an assessment of the contingent valuation method. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa
Cvetkovich G, Earle TC (1992) Environmental hazards and the public. J Soc Issues 48(4):1–20
Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York
Eyers CJ, Norman P, Middel J, Plohr M, Michot S, Atkinson K, Christou RA (2004) AERO2k global aviation emissions inventories for 2002 and 2025. QinetiQ, Farnborough, UK
Gore A (2006) An inconvenient truth: the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. Rodale Books, New York, p 328
Haab TC, McConnell KE (1997) Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions. J Environ Econ Manage 32:251–270
Hanemann WM, Kanninen B (1999) The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. In: Bateman Willis IJKG (ed) Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 302–441
Hanemann WM, Loomis JB, Kanninen B (1991) Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 73:1255–1263
Hersch J, Viscusi WK (2006) The generational divide in support for environmental policies: European evidence. Clim Change 77:121–136
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1999) Aviation and the global atmosphere. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
Jones-Lee MW (1989) The economics of safety and physical risk. Blackwell, Oxford
Layton DF, Brown G (2000) Heterogeneous preferences regarding global climate change. Rev Econ Stat 82:616–624
Layton DF, Levine RA (2002) How much does the far future matter? A hierarchical Bayesian analysis of the public’s willingness to mitigate ecological impacts of climate change. Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, p 29
Li H, Berrens RP, Bohara AK, Jenkins-Smith HC, Silva CL, Weimer DL (2004) Exploring the beta model using proportional budget information in a contingent valuation study. Ecol Econ 28:329–343
Maddala GS (1983) Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
McFadden D (1994) Contingent valuation and social choice. Am J Agric Econ 76:689–708
Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC
Nunes PALD, Schokkaert E (2003) Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation. J Environ Econ Manage 45:231–245
Oberthur S (2003) Institutional interaction to address greenhouse gas emissions from international transport: ICAO, IMO and the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy 3:191–205
Olsthoorn X (2001) Carbon dioxide emissions from international aviation: 1950–2050. J Air Transp Manag 7:87–93
Pearce D (2003) The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 19(3):362–384
Pearce DW, Smale R (2005) Appraising flood control investments in the UK. In: Brouwer R, Pearce DW (eds) Cost-benefit analysis and water resources management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Schiphol Group (2006) Facts and figures 2005. Schiphol, The Netherlands. www.schipholgroup.com.
Slovic P (1987) Perception of risk. Science 236:280–285
Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Tol R (1999) The marginal costs of greenhouse gas emissions. Energy J 20(1):61–81
Viscusi WK, Zeckhauser RJ (2006) The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: a rational and behavioral blend. Clim Change 77:151–177
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Brouwer, R., Brander, L. & Van Beukering, P. “A convenient truth”: air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Climatic Change 90, 299–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9414-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9414-0