Abstract
In addressing the problem of invasive species, decision makers have a variety of options, each targeting different aspects as it evolves over time and space. We develop a 2-region bioeconomic model that includes several transmission pathways that spread the invader. Within each region, inspections, removal efforts, and sustainable land management practices, including habitat restoration and less damaging production activities, are available to the regulator. We investigate the implications of different transmission pathways and second-best policies on the control patterns and invasive populations. Second-best settings where certain controls are not available to the regulator result in large distortions on the optimal use of the land. Overall, we find that non-linear interactions between regions, pathways, and controls are significant determinants of the optimal management of invasive species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bryson A (1998) Dynamic optimization. Pearson Education, New York
Carter CA, Chalfant JA, Goodhue RE, Zalom F, McKee G (2006) Biology and economics of invasive species: spatial and temporal interactions. PREISM Workship, Washington, DC
Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279: 555–558
Costello C, McAusland C (2003) Protectionism, trade, and measures of damage from exotic species introductions. Am J Agric Econ 85: 964–975
Costello C, McAusland C, Springborn M, Solow A (2007) Unintended biological invasions: does risk vary by trading partner?. J Environ Econ Manag 54: 262–276
Cumming GS (2002) Habitat shape, species invasions, and reserve design: insights from simple models. Conserv Ecol 6: 3
Davies K, Sheley R (2007) A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Sci 55: 178–184
Eiswerth ME, Kooten GCV (2002) Uncertainty, economics, and the spread of an invasive species. Am J Agric Econ 85: 1317–1322
Enserink M (1999) Predicting invasions: biological invaders sweep in. Science 285: 1834–1836
Finnoff D, Shogren JF, Leung B, Lodge DM (2005) The importance of bioeconomic feedback in nonindigenous species management. Ecol Econ 52: 367–381
Gordon D (1998) Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol Appl 8: 975–989
Hastings A, Byers JE, Crooks JA, Cuddington K, Jones CG, Lambrinos JG, Talley TS, Wilson WG (2007) Ecosystem engineering in space and time. Ecol Lett 10: 153–164
Hof J (1998) Optimizing spatial and dynamic population-based control strategies for invading forest pests. Nat Resour Model 11: 197–216
Horan R, Perrings C, Lupi F, Bulte E (2002) Biological pollution prevention strategies under ignorance: the case of invasive species. Am J Agric Econ 84: 1303–1310
Horan R, Wolf CA, Fenichel EP, Mathews KH (2005) Spatial management of wildlife disease. Rev Agric Econ 27: 483–490
Huenneke LF, Hamburg SP, Koide R, Mooney HA, Vitousek PM (1990) Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Science 71: 478–491
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373–386
Kaiser B, Roumasset J (2002) Optimal public control of exotic species: preventing the brown tree snake form invading Hawaii. WEA annual meetings 2002
Leung B, Lodge DM, Finnoff D, Shogren J, Lewis MA, Lamberti G (2002) An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species. Proc Biol Sci 269: 2407–2413
Margolis M, Shogren JF, Fischer C (2005) How trade politics affect invasive species control. Ecol Econ 52: 305–313
McAusland C, Costello C (2004) Avoiding invasives: trade related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions. J Environ Econ Manag 48: 954–977
Mehta SV, Haight RG, Homans FR, Polasky S, Venette RC (2007) Optimal detection and control strategies for invasive species management. Ecol Econ 61: 237–245
Olson LJ (2006) Economics of terrestrial invasive species: a review of the literature. Agric Resour Econ Rev 35: 178–194
Olson LJ, Roy S (2005) On prevention and control of an uncertain biological invasion. Rev Agric Econ 27: 491–497
Olson LJ, Roy S (2008) Controlling a biological invasion: a non-classical dynamic economic model. Econ Theory 36: 453–469
Sanchirico JN, Maldavkar U, Hastings A, Wilen J (2006) When are no-take zones an economically optimal fishery management strategy?. Ecol Appl 16(5): 1643–1659
Sharov A, Liebhold A (1998a) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Ecol Appl 8: 833–845
Sharov A, Liebhold A (1998b) Model of slowing the spread of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with a barrier zone. Ecol Appl 8: 1170–1179
Sharov AA (2004) Bioeconomics of managing the spread of exotic pest species with barrier zones. Risk Anal 24: 879–892
Skonhoft A, Olaussen JO (2005) Managing a migratory species that is both a value and pest. Land Econ 81
Wainger L, King DM (2006) Choosing efficient treatment options by assessing costs and benefits in a spatial risk-based optimization framework. PREISM Workshop, Washington, DC
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
The Below is the Electronic Supplementary Material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchirico, J.N., Albers, H.J., Fischer, C. et al. Spatial Management of Invasive Species: Pathways and Policy Options. Environ Resource Econ 45, 517–535 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9326-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9326-0