Abstract
There is growing policy and academic interest in transferring ecosystem service values from existing valuation studies to other ecosystem sites at a large geographic scale. Despite the evident policy demand for this combined transfer and “scaling up” of values, an approach to value transfer that addresses the challenges inherent in assessing ecosystem changes at a national or regional level is not available. This paper proposes a methodology for scaling up ecosystem service values to estimate the welfare effects of ecosystem change at this larger geographical scale. The methodology is illustrated by applying it to value the impact of climate change on European wetlands for the period 2000–2050. The proposed methodology makes use of meta-analysis to produce a value function. The parameters of the value function include spatial variables on wetland size and abundance, GDP per capita, and population. A geographic information system is used to construct a database of wetland sites in the case study region with information on these spatial variables. Site-specific ecosystem service values are subsequently estimated using the meta-analytic value function. The proposed method is shown to enable the adjustment of transferred values to reflect variation in important spatial variables and to account for changes in the stock of ecosystems.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bateman IJ, Day BH, Georgiou S, Lake I (2006) The aggregation of environmental benefit values: welfare measures, distance decay and total WTP. Ecol Econ 60: 450–460
Bischoff A, Wolter C (2001) The flood of the century on the river Oder: effects on the 0+ fish community and implications for floodplain restoration. Regul Rivers Res Manag 17: 171–190
Bockstael NE, Freeman AM III, Kopp RJ, Portney PR, Smith VK (2000) On measuring economic values for nature. Environ Sci Technol 34: 1384–1389
Bossard M, Feranec J, Otahel J (2000) CORINE land cover technical guide—Addendum 2000. European Environment Agency technical report No. 40
Braat, L, ten Brink, P (eds) (2008) The cost of policy inaction: the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target. Alterra, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Brander LM, Florax RJGM, Vermaat JE (2006) The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ Res Econ 33: 50–223
Buijse AD, Coops H, Staras M, Jans LH, van Geest GJ, Grift RE, Ibelings BW, Oosterberg W, Roozen FCM (2002) Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshw Biol 47: 889–907
Corone G, Denis C, McMorrow K, Mourre G, Roger W (2006) Long term labour productivity and GDP projections for the EU25 Member States: a production function framework. European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Economic Papers No. 253
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253–260
Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292: 673–679
Downing M, Ozuna J (1996) Testing the reliability of the benefit function transfer approach. J Environ Econ Manag 30: 22–316
Duel H, Denneman WD, Kwakernaak C (1994) Ecological models for rivers floodplain rehabilitation. Water Sci Technol 29: 383–386
Eshet T, Baron MG, Shechter M (2007) Exploring benefit transfer: disamenities of waste transfer stations. Environ Resour Econ 37: 47–521
Fennessy MS, Jacobs AD, Kentula ME (2004) Review of rapid methods for assessing wetland conditions. EPA/620/R-04/009. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., USA
Fisher B, Turner RK, Zylstra M, Brouwer R, De Groot R, Farber S, Ferraro P, Green R, Hadley D, Harlow J, Jefferiss P, Kirkby C, Morling P, Mowatt S, Naidoo R, Paavola J, Strassburg B, Yu D, Balmford A (2008) Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecol Appl 18: 2050–2067
Ghermandi A, van den Bergh JCJM, Brander LM, de Groot HLF, Nunes PALD (2010) The economic value of wetland conservation and creation: a meta-analysis. Water Resour Res 46: 1–12
Hoehn JP (2006) Methods to address selection effects in the meta regression and transfer of ecosystem values. Ecol Econ 60: 389–398
Johnston RJ, Besedin EY, Iovanna R, Miller CJ, Wardwell RF, Ranson MH (2005) Systematic variation in willingness to pay for aquatic resource improvements and implications for benefit transfer: a meta-analysis. Can J Agric Econ 53: 48–221
Johnston RJ, Rosenberger RS (2009) Methods, trends and controversies in contemporary benefit transfer. J Econ Surv 24: 479–510
Kirchhoff S (1998) Benefit function transfer vs. meta-analysis as policy-making tools: a comparison. In Proc. of Workshop on Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer: State-of-the-art and Prospects. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam
Marchand M, Marteijn ECL, Bakonyi P (1995) Policy analysis as a tool for habitat restoration: a case study of a Danube river floodplain, Hungary. Water Sci Technol 31: 179–186
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Moeltner K, Boyle KJ, Paterson RW (2007) Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modelling. J Environ Econ Manag 53: 250–269
Mullan K, Kontoleon A (2008) Benefits and costs of forest biodiversity: economic theory and case study evidence. Report prepared for IUCN
Navrud S, Ready R (2007) Environmental value transfer: Issues and methods. Springer, Berlin
Nelson JP, Kennedy PE (2009) The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and resource economics: an assessment. Environ Resour Econ 42: 345–377
Nicholls RJ (2004) Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14: 69–86
Osborne JW (2000) Prediction in multiple regression. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7. ISSN 1531-7714
Perrings C, Pearce DW (1994) Threshold effects and incentives for the conservation of biology. Environ Resour Econ 4: 13–28
Ready R, Navrud S (2006) International benefits transfer: methods and validity tests. Ecol Econ 60: 429–434
Rosenberger RS, Phipps TT (2007) Correspondence and convergence in benefit transfer accuracy: A meta-analytic review of the literature. In: Navrud S, Ready R (eds) Environmental values transfer: issues and methods. Springer, Dordrecht
Rosenberger RS, Stanley TD (2006) Measurement, generalization, and publication: Sources of error in benefit transfers and their management. Ecol Econ 60: 372–378
Rosenberger RS, Johnston RJ (2009) Selection effects in meta-analysis and benefit transfer: Avoiding unintended consequences. Land Econ 85: 410–428
Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walkerk B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596
Shrestha R, Rosenberger R, Loomis L (2007) Benefit transfer using meta-analysis in recreation economic valuation. In: Navrud S, Ready R (eds) Environmental value transfer: issues and methods. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Smith VK, Pattanayak SK (2002) Is meta-analysis a Noah’s Ark for non-market valuation?. Environ Resour Econ 22: 271–296
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Kumar P (ed). Earthscan, London and Washington
Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S (2003) Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ 46: 493–510
Wagtendonk A, Omtzigt N (2003) Analysis of population density around wetland areas in GPW (Gridded Population of the World) files. SPINlab document. Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Acknowledgments
This research has, in part, been funded by the European Environment Agency under contract 3603/B2008/EEA.53405 (2009). The authors are grateful to four anonymous reviewers for useful comments and suggestions on this paper.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Brander, L.M., Bräuer, I., Gerdes, H. et al. Using Meta-Analysis and GIS for Value Transfer and Scaling Up: Valuing Climate Change Induced Losses of European Wetlands. Environ Resource Econ 52, 395–413 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9535-1