Abstract
In this paper we investigate effects of overlap in species between ecosystems along a linear gradient on the location of marine protected areas (MPAs) under full cooperation, strategic behavior and conservation autarky. Compared to the full cooperation outcome, both strategic behavior and conservation autarky lead to under-investment in biodiversity protection. Under strategic behavior, however, we observe the additional problem of “location leakage” i.e. countries invest less in species protected by others. Conservation autarky eliminates location leakage; in ecosystems with partly overlapping species compositions at country borders it even induces MPAs that are too large from a global perspective. We also find that, in our setting of a linear gradient without migrating species, countries focus their conservation efforts on species unique to their own country and that these species are relatively well protected compared to common species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- MPA:
-
Marine protected area
References
Albers HJ, Ando AW, Batz M (2008) Patterns of multi-agent land conservation: crowding in/out, agglomeration, and policy. Resour Energy Econ 30: 492–508
Anderson LG (2002) A bioeconomic analysis of marine reserves. Nat Resour Model 15: 311–334
Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A (1998) Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 2126
Ando AW, Shah P (2010) Demand-side factors in optimal land conservation choice. Resour Energy Econ 32: 203–221
Armstrong CW (2007) A note on the ecological-economic modelling of marine reserves in fisheries. Ecol Econ 62: 242–250
Arthur JL, Camm JD, Haight RG, Montgomery CA, Polasky S (2004) Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection. Ecol Appl 14: 1936–1945
Beattie A, Sumaila UR, Christensen V, Pauly D (2002) A model for the bioeconomic evaluation of marine protected area size and placement in the North Sea. Nat Resour Model 18: 413–437
Beaumont NJ, Austen MC, Atkins JP, Burdon D, Degraer S, Dentinho TP, Derous S, Holm P, Horton T, van Ierland EC, Marboe AH, Starkey DJ, Townsend M, Zarzycki T (2007) Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Mar Pollut Bull 54: 253–265
Beger M, Linke S, Watts M, Game E, Treml E, Ball I, Possingham HP (2010) Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation. Conserv Lett 3: 359–368
Bladt J, Strange N, Abildtrup J, Svenning J-C, Skov F (2009) Conservation efficiency of geopolitical coordination in the EU. J Nat Conserv 17: 72–86
Bode M, Probert W, Turner WR, Wilson KA, Venter O (2011) Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives. Conserv Biol 25: 295–304
Boncoeur J, Alban F, Guyader O, Thébaud O (2002) Fish, fishers, seals and tourists: economic consequences of creating a marine reserve in a multi-species, multi-activity context. Nat Resour Model 15: 387–411
Cabeza M, Araújo MB, Wilson RJ, Thomas CD, Cowley MJR, Moilanen A (2004) Combining probabilities of occurrence with spatial reserve design. J Appl Ecol 41: 252–262
Camm JD, Norman SK, Polasky S, Solow AR (2002) Nature reserve site selection to maximize expected species covered. Oper Res 50: 946–955
Church RL, Stoms DM, Davis FW (1996) Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biol Conserv 76: 105–112
Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) COP 10 Decisions. http://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/?m=cop-10. Cited 11-11-2011
Costello C, Polasky S (2004) Dynamic reserve site selection. Resour Energy Econ 26: 157–174
Dalton TM (2004) An approach for integrating economic impact analysis into the evaluation of potential marine protected area sites. J Environ Manag 70: 333–349
Faith DP (1992) Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv 61: 1–10
Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling C (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35: 557–581
Game ET, Watts ME, Wooldridge S, Possingham HP (2008) Planning for persistence in marine reserves: a question of catastrophic importance. Ecol Appl 18: 670–680
Goeschl T, Igliori DC (2004) Reconciling conservation and development: a dynamic hotelling model of extractive reserves. Land Econ 80: 340–354
Groeneveld RA (2010) Species-specific spatial characteristics in reserve site selection. Ecol Econ 69: 2307–2314
Hannesson R (1998) Marine reserves: what would they accomplish?. Mar Resour Econ 13: 159–170
Haupt RL, Haupt SE (2004) Practical genetic algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken
Hill MO (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54: 427–432
Hunter ML, Hutchinson A (1994) The virtues and shortcomings of parochialism: conserving species that are locally rare, but globally common. Conserv Biol 8: 1163–1165
Jantke K, Schneider UA (2010) Multiple-species conservation planning for European wetlands with different degrees of coordination. Biol Conserv 143: 1812–1821
Kar TK, Matsuda H (2008) A bioeconomic model of a single-species fishery with a marine reserve. J Environ Manag 86: 171–180
Kark S, Levin N, Grantham HS, Possingham HP (2009) Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 15368–15373
Mainwaring L (2001) Biodiversity, biocomplexity, and the economics of genetic dissimilarity. Land Econ 77: 79–93
Nekola JC, White PS (1999) The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J Biogeogr 26: 867–878
Ngoc Q (2010) Creation of marine reserves and incentives for biodiversity conservation. Nat Resour Model 23: 138–175
Polasky S, Camm JD, Garber-Yonts B (2001) Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Econ 77: 68–78
Polasky S, Camm JD, Solow AR, Csuti B, White D, Ding R (2000) Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biol Conserv 94: 1–10
Punt MJ, Weikard HP, Groeneveld RA, van Ierland EC, Stel JH (2010) Planning marine protected areas: a multiple use game. Nat Resour Model 23: 610–646
Richardson EA, Kaiser MJ, Edwards-Jones G, Possingham HP (2006) Sensitivity of marine-reserve design to the spatial resolution of socioeconomic data. Conserv Biol 20: 1191–1202
Ricotta C (2004) A parametric diversity measure combining the relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Divers Distrib 10: 143–146
Rodrigues ASL, Gaston KJ (2002) Rarity and conservation planning across geopolitical units. Conserv Biol 16: 674–682
Ruijs A, Janmaat J (2007) Chasing the spillovers: locating protected areas in a trans-boundary fishery. Land Econ 83: 6–22
Sala E, Aburto-Oropeza O, Paredes G, Parra I, Barrera JC, Dayton PK (2002) A general model for designing networks of marine reserves. Science 298: 1991–1993
Sanchirico JN (2004) Designing a cost-effective marine reserve network: a bioeconomic metapopulation analysis. Mar Resour Econ 19: 41–65
Schnier KE (2005) Biological “hot spots” and their effect on optimal bioeconomic marine reserve formation. Ecol Econ 52: 453–468
Smith MD, Wilen JD (2003) Economic impacts of marine reserves: the importance of spatial behavior. J Environ Econ Manag 46: 183–206
Solow A, Polasky S, Broadus J (1993) On the measurement of biological diversity. J Environ Econ Manag 24: 60–68
Son YS, Baldick R (2004) Hybrid coevolutionary programming for Nash equilibrium search in games with local optima. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8: 305–315
Stewart RR, Noyce T, Possingham HP (2003) Opportunity cost of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253: 25–38
Sumaila UR (1998) Bioeconomics and the ecopath/ecosim framework. In: Pauly D (ed) Use of Ecopath with Ecosim to evaluate strategies for sustainable exploitation of multispecies resources. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Sumaila UR (2002) Marine protected area performance in a model of the fishery. Nat Resour Model 15: 439–451
van der Heide CM, van den Bergh JCJM, van Ierland EC (2005) Extending Weitzman’s economic ranking of biodiversity protection: combining ecological and genetic considerations. Ecol Econ 55: 218–223
Weikard HP (2002) Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity. Land Econ 78: 20–27
Weikard HP, Punt M, Wesseler J (2006) Diversity measurement combining relative abundances and taxonomic distinctiveness of species. Divers Distrib 12: 215–217
Weitzman ML (1992) On diversity. Q J Econ 107: 363–405
Weitzman ML (1993) What to preserve? An application of diversity theory to crane conservation. Q J Econ 108: 155–183
Weitzman ML (1998) The Noah’s ark problem. Econometrica 66: 1279–1298
Williams PH, Araéjo MB (2000) Using probability of persistence to identify important areas for biodiversity conservation. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 267: 1959–1966
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper has not been submitted elsewhere in identical or similar form, nor will it be during the first 3 months after its submission to the Publisher.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Punt, M.J., Weikard, HP., van Ierland, E.C. et al. Large Scale Marine Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation Along a Linear Gradient: Cooperation, Strategic Behavior or Conservation Autarky?. Environ Resource Econ 53, 203–228 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9559-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9559-1