Abstract
Background
Feather pecking is a serious behavioral disorder in chickens that has a considerable impact on animal welfare and poses an economic burden for poultry farming. To study the underlying genetics of feather pecking animals were divergently selected for feather pecking over 15 generations based on estimated breeding values for the behavior.
Methods and results
By characterizing the transcriptomes of whole brains isolated from high and low feather pecking chickens in response to light stimulation we discovered a putative dysregulation of micro RNA processing caused by a lack of Dicer1. This results in a prominent downregulation of the GABRB2 gene and other GABA receptor transcripts, which might cause a constant high level of excitation in the brains of high feather pecking chickens. Moreover, our results point towards an increase in immune system-related transcripts that may be caused by higher interferon concentrations due to Dicer1 downregulation.
Conclusion
Based on our results, we conclude that feather pecking in chickens and schizophrenia in humans have numerous common features. For instance, a Dicer1 dependent disruption of miRNA biogenesis and the lack of GABRB2 expression have been linked to schizophrenia pathogenesis. Furthermore, disturbed circadian rhythms and dysregulation of genes involved in the immune system are common features of both conditions.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Feather pecking (FP) in chickens is a damaging obsessive behavioral disorder with a genetic component [1]. Common features with obsessive compulsive disorder like involvement of immune mechanisms have been reported [2]. Furthermore, in previous studies, we identified putative enhancer RNAs that target schizophrenia-associated genes [3] as well as numerous genetic variants in genes that have been previously linked to schizophrenia, namely GABRB2, SPATS2L, ZEB2, and KCHN8 [4]. Hence, FP may be a potential model system for these conditions. A recent study reported major differences in the diurnal rhythm of gene expression between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls [5]. The study by Seney et al. revealed that healthy individuals and schizophrenia patients express two different sets of rhythmic transcripts and discovered an influence on GABAergic-related transcripts. This led us to reevaluate the brain transcriptome response of chickens divergently selected for high and low FP to light stimulation, a major trigger of FP behavior [6].
Material and methods
All experimental procedures were described in a previous study [3]. Briefly, White Leghorn strains were selected for over 15 generations based on estimated breeding values for feather pecking. Rearing and husbandry conditions have been described by Bennewitz et al. [7]. At the age of 27 weeks, 48 hens (12 full-sib pairs from each strain) were phenotyped according to established protocols. Observation of feather pecking behavior was done in 20-min sessions on four consecutive days by a minimum of six different trained observers. To prevent FP birds were kept under low light conditions. One bird from each full-sib pair kept under dark conditions was sacrificed and whole brains were immediately collected for RNA isolation. Chickens were CO2-stunned and sacrificed by ventral neck cutting. For light stimulation, the remaining birds were kept under increased light intensity (≥ 100 lx) for several hours. Upon initiation of FP behavior these birds we sacrificed as well and brains were collected for RNA isolation. For the detection of genetic variation between the two chicken lines animals were phenotyped in groups of 42 hens at the age of 32 weeks and observed in 20 min sessions by seven independent trained observers [4]. Phenotypic values were standardized to 420 min observation time followed by box-cox transformation as described by Iffland et al. [8]. Analysis pipelines of transcriptomic and genomic data are outlined in our previous studies [3, 4]. Briefly, Illumina short RNA sequencing reads were trimmed and filtered with trimmomatic, mapped to the chicken reference assembly GRCg6a with TopHat, differential expression analysis was performed with DEseq2, and gene set enrichment analysis with clusterProfiler. Variant calling from genomic data was performed according to the GATK best practice guidelines. SNP chip data were imputed with Beagle and GWAS was conducted with gcta.
Results
Low feather peckers (LFP) respond to light by upregulation of 714 and downregulation of 11 transcripts with 249 of these transcripts annotated as non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). Surprisingly, high feather peckers (HFP) only show upregulation of one and downregulation of 18 transcripts (abs. log2 fold change > 1, adj. p-value < 0.01, Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Information S1). To highlight the different directions of expression of a majority of these transcripts log2 fold changes of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the HFP group in comparison to the LFP group are shown in a heatmap (Fig. 1c). Significantly associated KEGG pathways after gene cluster analysis of DEGs in LFP brains in response to light compared to animals kept in the dark are shown in Fig. 1d to illustrate the loss of pathway activation in HFP (summary of results in Supplementary Information S2). Due to the low number of DEGs in HFP no gene cluster analysis could be performed. To identify genetic variation that might explain the strong difference between the two chicken lines a previously performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) [4] was repeated with a modified phenotype: feather pecks delivered box-cox transformed (Fig. 1e, Supplementary Information S3). We observed a strong peak on chromosome 1 that contains variants associated with GABRA5 and GABRG3. Furthermore, we discovered GWAS hits (p-value < 0.05) on several chromosomes in proximity to or within the genes GABRA1, GABRB2, GABRD, GABRG2, GABRG3, GABRR1, and GABRR2. The functionally most interesting variant among those is rs733309797 on chromosome 13 at position 8,186,801 (p-value = 0.044), which was predicted to be a splice region variant in the GABRB2 gene.
Discussion
HFP exhibit a surprisingly low level of excitability to the light stimulus. An overall reduced variability of gene expression levels in whole brains of HFP was previously reported [9]. However, an even more remarkable difference between the two chicken lines was the direction of the log2 fold changes of DEGs in HFP (Fig. 1c). The majority of genes downregulated in HFP were upregulated in LFP in response to light. Since Dicer1 is among those genes we hypothesize that the processing of and consequently the signaling by miRNAs is disturbed in HFP birds. Among DEGs in LFP brains after light stimulation, we identified about one-third to be ncRNAs, which we already observed by comparing brain transcriptomes of HFP with LFP [3]. We assume that in HFP ncRNAs are not properly processed due to the absence of the Dicer1 protein. Similar observations were made in transcriptome analyses of post mortem human brains of schizophrenia patients [10]. The authors hypothesized that these “psychiatric ncRNAs” might have an impact on local splicing events leading to transcriptome dysregulation. However, in a more recent study, the authors suggested that a Dicer1 dependent disruption of miRNA biogenesis may play a role in schizophrenia pathogenesis [11].
GABRB2 is an ionotropic type A γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor, which has been linked to schizophrenia in multiple studies (reviewed in [12]). Downregulation of multiple miRNAs has been shown to have an impact on GABRB2 protein levels in humans with internet gaming disorder [13]. Furthermore, it was recently shown in a murine knockout model that the lack of GABRB2 leads to various schizophrenia-like symptoms [14], which goes in line with our observations. We observed a downregulation of GABRB2 in HFP in response to light, which is considered a major trigger of FP behavior. We hypothesize that lower expression levels of GABRB2 in HFP brains (Fig. 1c) are caused by miRNA dysregulation, which ultimately leads to a disruption of GABA-mediated cellular ion influx. GABA is classified as the major inhibitory neurotransmitter, which might explain the low number of DE genes in the brains of HFP in response to light: A constant high level of excitation in neurons in the absence of inhibitory GABA signaling may not leave enough room for a response to be induced, even with the most basic stimuli. Furthermore, this high steady-state of excitation in HFP brains might provide an explanation for the behavior on the physiological level. In addition, the genes GABRA2, GABRB2, GABRE, and GABRG3 were upregulated in the LFP’s response to light (Fig. 1a), which further indicates that there is a lack of GABA receptor upregulation in HFP. In one of our previous studies, an intron variant in the GABRB2 gene was among the top variants associated with extreme FP [4]. This motivated us to repeat our GWAS on SNP chip genotypes imputed to whole-genome density of this half-sib population selected for high and low feather pecking [4] with a modified phenotype (feather pecks delivered box-cox transformed) as described by Iffland et al. [8]. Various variants associated with FP in the proximity to GABA receptors were discovered in that study with a medium density SNP chip based approach. We also discovered genetic variants located in or in close proximity to seven GABA receptor genes including GABRB2 in whole genome sequence density genotypes (Fig. 1e). This and the fact that GABRB2 is among the top candidates in our transcriptome studies and two independent GWAS approaches make GABAergic signaling one of the most promising research targets for future FP studies. It needs to be clarified in functional studies, whether GABA levels significantly differ in the two chicken lines and whether the administration of GABA leads to a reduction in feather pecking behavior. If our theory holds true further research should focus on the dissection of the genetics behind this GABA receptor dysregulation to develop new strategies in the breeding of egg-laying chickens to effectively select against the causative alleles.
The only upregulated gene in HFP after light stimulation was MHCIA2, which has a high similarity to human HLA-C (e-value = 9 × 10–69 as determined by NCBI protein BLAST). HLA-C is a risk factor for schizophrenia [15] that is interferon-inducible [16]. Since Dicer represses the interferon response [17], a lack of Dicer as observed in HFP may lead to activation of immune response genes—a connection that we and others previously established [3, 18, 19].
Another observation that caught our attention was the significant downregulation of the core circadian rhythm genes PER2 and PER3 [20] in HFP in response to light (Fig. 1c). Evidence that disturbances in circadian rhythms trigger severe psychiatric disease has been accumulating [21]. Various studies reported disturbed circadian rhythms in schizophrenia patients or model systems in connection to PER2 and PER3 expression or gene polymorphisms [22,23,24,25]. PER3 in particular was linked to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder [26, 27], which would comply with a hyperactivity disorder model of FP as proposed by Kjaer [28]. The brain transcriptome response of LFP to the light stimulus leads to an upregulation of numerous KEGG pathways (Fig. 1d), all of which have been linked to the circadian clock [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. In HFP we observe a complete loss of gene activation regarding these KEGG pathways, which we conclude to be the result of the previously mentioned high level of constant neuronal excitation. If the neurons of HFP are on a constant high level of excitation the brain most likely does not respond to even basic stimuli.
Conclusion
We currently believe that downregulation of Dicer1 leads to a decrease in miRNA production and further downstream to downregulation of GABRB2 and a lack of upregulation of GABRA2, GABRE, and GABRG3. This could result in high steady-state levels of neuronal excitation in HFP. Furthermore, Dicer1 is a repressor of the interferon response and its downregulation might lead to higher interferon concentrations. Interferons are major signaling proteins that activate various immune response pathways which might explain the previously described increase in immune system-related genes in HFP. The functional validation of these findings could lead to the genetic dissection of feather pecking and build the basis for breeding against this damaging behavior. However, additional validation of these findings needs to be addressed in commercial flocks of egg laying chickens to exclude that these findings are limited to chickens selected for high feather pecking behavior. Due to the manifold commonalities with human psychiatric disorders, especially schizophrenia, chickens that have been selected for FP behavior over multiple generations might serve as a representative model for these conditions.
References
Rodenburg TB, Buitenhuis AJ, Ask B et al (2003) Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poult Sci 82:861–867. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.6.861
Brunberg E, Jensen P, Isaksson A et al (2011) Feather pecking behavior in laying hens: hypothalamic gene expression in birds performing and receiving pecks. Poult Sci 90:1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00961
Falker-Gieske C, Mott A, Preuß S et al (2020) Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-07002-1
Falker-Gieske C, Iffland H, Preuß S et al (2020) Meta-analyses of genome wide association studies in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking using imputed sequence level genotypes. BMC Genet. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00920-9
Seney ML, Cahill K, Enwright JF et al (2019) Diurnal rhythms in gene expression in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11335-1
Riber AB, Guzman DA (2016) Effects of dark brooders on behavior and fearfulness in layers. Animals (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6010003
Bennewitz J, Bögelein S, Stratz P et al (2014) Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models. Poult Sci 93:810–817. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03638
Iffland H, Wellmann R, Preuß S et al (2020) A novel model to explain extreme feather pecking behavior in laying hens. Behav Genet 50:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-019-09971-w
Hughes AL, Buitenhuis AJ (2010) Reduced variance of gene expression at numerous loci in a population of chickens selected for high feather pecking. Poult Sci 89:1858–1869. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00827
Gandal MJ, Zhang P, Hadjimichael E et al (2018) Transcriptome-wide isoform-level dysregulation in ASD, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8127
Rey R, Suaud-Chagny M-F, Dorey J-M et al (2020) Widespread transcriptional disruption of the microRNA biogenesis machinery in brain and peripheral tissues of individuals with schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01052-5
Tsang SY, Ullah A, Xue H (2019) GABRB2 in neuropsychiatric disorders: genetic associations and functional evidences. CPSP 8:166–176. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211556008666190926115813
Lee M, Cho H, Jung SH et al (2018) Circulating MicroRNA expression levels associated with internet gaming disorder. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00081
Yeung RK, Xiang Z-H, Tsang S-Y et al (2018) Gabrb2-knockout mice displayed schizophrenia-like and comorbid phenotypes with interneuron-astrocyte-microglia dysregulation. Transl Psychiatry 8:128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-018-0176-9
(2012) Genome-wide association study implicates HLA-C*01:02 as a risk factor at the major histocompatibility complex locus in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 72:620–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.035
Campbell IL, Bizilj K, Colman PG et al (1986) Interferon-gamma induces the expression of HLA-A, B, C but not HLA-DR on human pancreatic beta-cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 62:1101–1109. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-62-6-1101
Gurung C, Fendereski M, Sapkota K et al (2021) Dicer represses the interferon response and the double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase pathway in mouse embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 296:100264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100264
Parmentier HK, Rodenburg TB, de Vries Reilingh G et al (2009) Does enhancement of specific immune responses predispose laying hens for feather pecking? Poult Sci 88:536–542. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00424
van der Eijk JAJ, Verwoolde MB, de Vries Reilingh G et al (2019) Chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking differ in immune characteristics. Physiol Behav 212:112680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112680
Hardin PE, Hall JC, Rosbash M (1990) Feedback of the Drosophila period gene product on circadian cycling of its messenger RNA levels. Nature 343:536–540. https://doi.org/10.1038/343536a0
Karatsoreos IN (2014) Links between circadian rhythms and psychiatric disease. Front Behav Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00162
Moons T, Claes S, Martens GJM et al (2011) Clock genes and body composition in patients with schizophrenia under treatment with antipsychotic drugs. Schizophr Res 125:187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2010.10.008
Liu JJ, Sudic Hukic D, Forsell Y et al (2015) Depression-associated ARNTL and PER2 genetic variants in psychotic disorders. Chronobiol Int 32:579–584. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2015.1012588
Sun H-Q, Li S-X, Chen F-B et al (2016) Diurnal neurobiological alterations after exposure to clozapine in first-episode schizophrenia patients. Psychoneuroendocrinology 64:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.11.013
Johansson A-S, Owe-Larsson B, Hetta J et al (2016) Altered circadian clock gene expression in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 174:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.029
Faltraco F, Palm D, Uzoni A et al (2021) Dopamine adjusts the circadian gene expression of Per2 and Per3 in human dermal fibroblasts from ADHD patients. J Neural Transm 128:1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02374-4
Palm D, Uzoni A, Simon F et al (2021) Norepinephrine influences the circadian clock in human dermal fibroblasts from study participants with a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Neural Transm 128:1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-021-02376-2
Kjaer JB (2009) Feather pecking in domestic fowl is genetically related to locomotor activity levels: implications for a hyperactivity disorder model of feather pecking. Behav Genet 39:564–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9280-1
Xiao B, Chen T-M, Zhong Y (2016) Possible molecular mechanism underlying cadmium-induced circadian rhythms disruption in zebrafish. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 481:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.10.081
Niehaus GD, Ervin E, Patel A et al (2002) Circadian variation in cell-adhesion molecule expression by normal human leukocytes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 80:935–940. https://doi.org/10.1139/y02-121
Lundkvist GB, Kwak Y, Davis EK et al (2005) A calcium flux is required for circadian rhythm generation in mammalian pacemaker neurons. J Neurosci 25:7682–7686. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2211-05.2005
Xiong X, Li W, Nam J et al (2021) Integrin signaling via actin cytoskeleton activates MRTF/SRF to entrain circadian clock. 9
Zheng X, Yang Z, Yue Z et al (2007) FOXO and insulin signaling regulate sensitivity of the circadian clock to oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:15899–15904. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701599104
Ko ML, Jian K, Shi L et al (2009) Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-Akt signaling serves as a circadian output in the retina. J Neurochem 108:1607–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05931.x
Wang P, Sun Q, Wan R et al (2020) Progesterone affects the transcription of genes in the circadian rhythm signaling and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axes and changes the sex ratio in crucian carp (Carassius auratus). Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 77:103378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2020.103378
Vagnerová K, Ergang P, Soták M et al (2019) Diurnal expression of ABC and SLC transporters in jejunum is modulated by adrenalectomy. Comp Biochem Physiol C 226:108607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.108607
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) under file numbers TE622/4-2 and BE3703/8-2. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Publication fee was covered by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: JT, JB; Methodology: CFG, JT; Formal analysis and investigation: CFG; Writing—original draft preparation: CFG; Writing—review and editing: JT, JB; Funding acquisition: JT, JB; Resources: JT, JB; Supervision: JT.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare to have no competing interests of any kind.
Ethical approval
The research protocol was approved by the German Ethical Commission of Animal Welfare of the Provincial Government of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany (code: HOH 35/15 PG, date of approval: April 25, 2017).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11033_2021_7111_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Information S1: Differentially expressed genes in brains of low feather pecking and high feather pecking hens after light stimulation (abs. log2 fold change >1, adj. p-value < 0.01). (XLSX 73 kb)
11033_2021_7111_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Information S2: ClusterProfiler KEGG pathway analysis results of differentially expressed genes from brains of low feather pecking hens after light stimulation. (XLSX 5 kb)
11033_2021_7111_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplementary Information S3: Genomic variants from genome wide association study of low and high feather peckers with the phenotype “feather pecks delivered box-cox transformed” (p-value < 0.05). (XLSX 18757 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Falker-Gieske, C., Bennewitz, J. & Tetens, J. The light response in chickens divergently selected for feather pecking behavior reveals mechanistic insights towards psychiatric disorders. Mol Biol Rep 49, 1649–1654 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-07111-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-07111-4