Abstract
The measurement of social and psychological phenomena has been advanced by recent progress in the fields of behavioural economics and hedonic psychology. In addition, the increased interest in understanding how individuals perceive their own quality of life, has led to investigating the relations between various macro and individual level variables, generically subsumed as happiness. For many “happiness is considered to be an ultimate goal in life” and it plays an important role in the way people perceive the overall society they live in. Therefore, social scientists and behavioural economists are now stressing the importance of well-being measures, related to people’s evaluations of their quality of life in addition to economic indicators. In the transport sector, project evaluation is mainly based on cost–benefit analyses using economic indicators. However, any provided transportation project/service impacts the quality of the travel experience, the well-being of travellers and their travel behaviour. Competitiveness of modes may be also affected by the promotion of derived or experienced travellers’ well-being. Thus, existing behavioural travel choice models should be enhanced with regards to their behavioural validity incorporating the impacts of travelling happiness/ satisfaction. This study aims to understand and model the impact of stated (anticipated) happiness in the decision choice between a private transport mode—car, and a public transport mode—metro.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abou-Zeid, M. (2008). Exploration of travel well-being in static and dynamic contexts. Presented at the fourth annual transportation student research symposium. Boston.
Ben-Akiva, M., & Abou-Zeid, M. (2007). Happiness and the dynamic hybrid choice model. In Presented at the frontiers of transportation: Social interactions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ben-Akiva, M. (2007). Happiness and activity-based models, key note speech. In European transport conference.
Clark, A. E. (2006). A note on unhappiness and unemployment duration. PSE working papers 2006–23, PSE (Ecole normale supérieure), Paris.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. The Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659. doi:10.2307/2234639.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
Diener, E., Scollon, C. N., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. Advances in Cell Aging and Gerontology, 15, 187–219. doi:10.1016/S1566-3124(03)15007-9.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramowitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.
Freedman, J. (1978). Happy people: What happiness is? Who has it? And why? New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What can economists learn with happiness research. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435 (American Economic Association, June 2002).
Iaffaldano, M. T., & Muchinsky, P. M. (1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 251–273. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.251.
Kahn, B. E., & Isen, A. M. (1993). The influence of positive affect on variety seeking among safe enjoyable products. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 257–70. doi:10.1086/209347.
Kashdan, T. B. (2004). The assessment of subjective well-being (issues raised by the Oxford happiness questionnaire). Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1225–1232. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00213-7.
Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method (DRM). Science, 306, 1776–1780. doi:10.1126/science.1103572.
Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24. doi:10.1257/089533006776526030.
Knut, G., & Stephan, G. (1996). A paper on unhappiness and unemployment in Germany. Economics Letters, 52(3), 325–330. doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(96)00858-0.
Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London, Great Britain: Allen Lane.
McFadden, D. (2007). The behavioral science of transportation. Transport Policy, 14(4), 269–274. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.07.001.
Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). When is getting there half of the fun? Modelling the liking for travel. Transportation Research. Part A, Policy and Practice 39(2–3), 97–123. Available at http://repositories.cdlib.org/postprints/549. Accessed on 5th December 2007.
Sandvik, E., Diener, E., & Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self report measures. Journal of Personality, 61, 317–342. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00283.x.
Veenhoven, R. (2004). Happiness as an aim in public policy: The greatest happiness principle. In A. Linely & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. ISBN 0471459062. http://www2.eur.nl/fsw/research/veenhoven/Pub2000s/2004c-full.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G. et al. New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics. Netnomics 11, 5–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-009-9037-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-009-9037-2