Abstract
We compare a variety of nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) extrapolation algorithms, including optimization, magneto-frictional, and Grad – Rubin-like codes, applied to a solar-like reference model. The model used to test the algorithms includes realistic photospheric Lorentz forces and a complex field including a weakly twisted, right helical flux bundle. The codes were applied to both forced “photospheric” and more force-free “chromospheric” vector magnetic field boundary data derived from the model. When applied to the chromospheric boundary data, the codes are able to recover the presence of the flux bundle and the field’s free energy, though some details of the field connectivity are lost. When the codes are applied to the forced photospheric boundary data, the reference model field is not well recovered, indicating that the combination of Lorentz forces and small spatial scale structure at the photosphere severely impact the extrapolation of the field. Preprocessing of the forced photospheric boundary does improve the extrapolations considerably for the layers above the chromosphere, but the extrapolations are sensitive to the details of the numerical codes and neither the field connectivity nor the free magnetic energy in the full volume are well recovered. The magnetic virial theorem gives a rapid measure of the total magnetic energy without extrapolation though, like the NLFFF codes, it is sensitive to the Lorentz forces in the coronal volume. Both the magnetic virial theorem and the Wiegelmann extrapolation, when applied to the preprocessed photospheric boundary, give a magnetic energy which is nearly equivalent to the value derived from the chromospheric boundary, but both underestimate the free energy above the photosphere by at least a factor of two. We discuss the interpretation of the preprocessed field in this context. When applying the NLFFF codes to solar data, the problems associated with Lorentz forces present in the low solar atmosphere must be recognized: the various codes will not necessarily converge to the correct, or even the same, solution.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aly, J.J.: 1984, Astrophys. J. 283, 349.
Aly, J.J.: 1989, Solar Phys. 120, 19.
Barnes, G., Leka, K.D., Wheatland, M.S.: 2006, Astrophys. J. 641, 1188.
Chandrasekhar, S.: 1961, Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Chandrasekhar, S., Fermi, E.: 1953, Astrophys. J. 118, 116.
Chodura, R., Schlüter, A.: 1981, J. Comput. Phys. 41, 68.
Gary, G.A.: 1989, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 69, 323.
Gary, G.A., Hagyard, M.J.: 1990, Solar Phys. 126, 21.
Grad, H., Rubin, H.: 1958, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Peac. Uses At. Energy 31, 190.
Handy, B.N., Acton, L.W., Kankelborg, C.C., Wolfson, C.J., Akin, D.J., Bruner, M.E., et al.: 1999, Solar Phys. 187, 229.
Hoeksema, J.T.: 1991, Adv. Space Res. 11, 15.
Low, B.C.: 1984. In: M.J. Hagyard (ed.) Measurements of Solar Vector Magnetic Fields, NASA CP 2374, 49.
Low, B.C., Lou, Y.Q.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 352, 343.
Metcalf, T.R., Jiao, L., McClymont, A.N., Canfield, R.C., Uitenbroek, H.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 439, 474.
Metcalf, T.R., Leka, K.D., Mickey, D.L.: 2005, Astrophys. J. 623, L53.
Molodenskii, M.M.: 1969, Sov. Astron. AJ 12, 585.
Priest, E.R.: 1984, Solar Magneto-Hydrodynamics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Priest, E.R., Démoulin, P.: 1995, J. Geophys. Res. 100(A12), 23443.
Riley, P., Linker, J.A., Mikić, Z., Lionello, R., Ledvina, S.A., Luhmann, J.G.: 2006, Astrophys. J. 653, 1510.
Sakurai, T.: 1979, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 31, 209.
Sakurai, T.: 1981, Solar Phys. 69, 343.
Scherrer, P.H., Bogart, R.S., Bush, R.I., Hoeksema, J.T., Kosovichev, A.G., Schou, J., et al.: 1995, Solar Phys. 162, 129.
Schrijver, C.J., DeRosa, M.L.: 2003, Solar Phys. 212, 165.
Schrijver, C.J., DeRosa, M.L., Metcalf, T.R., Liu, Y., McTiernan, J., Régnier, S., et al.: 2006, Solar Phys. 235, 161.
Valori, G., Kliem, B., Fuhrmann, M.: 2007, Solar Phys. 245, 263.
van Ballegooijen, A.A.: 2004, Astrophys. J. 612, 519.
van Ballegooijen, A.A., DeLuca, E.E., Squires, K., Mackay, D.H.: 2007, J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 69, 24.
van Ballegooijen, A.A., Priest, E.R., Mackay, D.H.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 539, 983.
Wang, Y.-M., Sheeley, N.R.: 1990, Astrophys. J. 365, 372.
Wheatland, M.S.: 2004, Solar Phys. 222, 247.
Wheatland, M.S.: 2006, Solar Phys. 238, 29.
Wheatland, M.S., Sturrock, P.A., Roumeliotis, G.: 2000, Astrophys. J. 540, 1150.
Wiegelmann, T.: 2004, Solar Phys. 219, 87.
Wiegelmann, T.: 2007, Solar Phys. 240, 227.
Wiegelmann, T., Neukirch, T.: 2006, Astron. Astrophys. 457, 1053.
Wiegelmann, T., Inhester, B., Sakurai, T.: 2006, Solar Phys. 233, 215.
Wiegelmann, T., Thalmann, J.K., Schrijver, C.J., DeRosa, M.L., Metcalf, T.R.: 2008, Solar Phys. in press.
Yang, W.H., Sturrock, P.A., Antiochos, S.K.: 1986, Astrophys. J. 309, 383.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
On 07/07/2007, the NLFFF team was saddened by the news that Tom Metcalf had died as the result of an accident. We remain grateful for having had the opportunity to benefit from his unwavering dedication to the problems encountered in attempting to understand the Sun’s magnetic field; Tom had completed this paper several months before his death, leading the team through the many steps described above.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Metcalf, T.R., DeRosa, M.L., Schrijver, C.J. et al. Nonlinear Force-Free Modeling of Coronal Magnetic Fields. II. Modeling a Filament Arcade and Simulated Chromospheric and Photospheric Vector Fields. Sol Phys 247, 269–299 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9110-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-007-9110-7