Abstract
Most research on micronutrients in maize has focused on maize grown as a monocrop. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of intercropping on the concentrations of micronutrients in maize grain and their acquisition via the shoot. We conducted field experiments to investigate the effects of intercropping with turnip (Brassica campestris L.), faba bean (Vicia faba L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) on the iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) concentrations in the grain and their acquisition via the above-ground shoots of maize (Zea mays L.). Compared with monocropped maize grain, the grain of maize intercropped with legumes showed lower concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn and lower values of their corresponding harvest indexes. The micronutrient concentrations and harvest indexes in grain of maize intercropped with turnip were the same as those in monocropped maize grain. Intercropping stimulated the above-ground maize shoot acquisition of Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn, when averaged over different phosphorus (P) application rates. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the effects of intercropping on micronutrient concentrations in maize grain and on micronutrients acquisition via maize shoots (straw+grain). The maize grain Fe and Cu concentrations, but not Mn and Zn concentrations, were negatively correlated with maize grain yields. The concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn in maize grain were positively correlated with their corresponding harvest indexes. The decreased Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn concentrations in grain of maize intercropped with legumes were attributed to reduced translocation of Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn from vegetative tissues to grains. This may also be related to the delayed senescence of maize plants intercropped with legumes. We conclude that turnip/maize intercropping is beneficial to obtain high maize grain yield without decreased concentrations of Fe, Mn, Cu, and Zn in the grain. Further research is required to clarify the mechanisms underlying the changes in micronutrient concentrations in grain of intercropped maize.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Vandermeer J. The Ecology of Intercropping. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989
Knoerzer H, Graeff-Hoenninger S, Guo B, et al. The rediscovery of intercropping in China: a traditional cropping system for future Chinese agriculture-a review. In: Lichtfouse E, ed. Climate Change, Intercropping, Pest Control and Beneficial Microorganisms. New York: Springer, 2009. 13–44
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen E S. Facilitative root interactions in intercrops. Plant Soil, 2005, 274: 237–250
Li L, Li S M, Sun J H, et al. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007, 104: 11192–11196
Römheld V, Marschner H. Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiol, 1986, 80: 175–180
Zuo Y M, Zhang F S, Li X L, et al. Studies on the improvement in iron nutrition of peanut by intercropping with maize on a calcareous soil. Plant Soil, 2000, 220: 13–25
An L Y, Pan Y H, Wang Z B, et al. Heavy metal absorption status of five plant species in monoculture and intercropping. Plant Soil, 2011, 345: 237–245
White P J, Broadley M R. Biofortifying crops with essential mineral elements. Trends Plant Sci, 2005, 10: 586–593
Pixley K V, Palacios-Rojas N, Glahn R P. The usefulness of iron bioavailability as a target trait for breeding maize (Zea mays L.) with enhanced nutritional value. Field Crop Res, 2011, 123: 153–160
Feil B, Moser S B, Jampatong S, et al. Mineral composition of the grains of tropical maize varieties as affected by pre-anthesis drought and rate of nitrogen fertilization. Crop Sci, 2005, 45: 516–523
Bouis H E, Hotz C, McClafferty B, et al. Biofortification: a new tool to reduce micronutrient malnutrition. Food Nutr Bull, 2011, 32: S31–S40
Bruns H A, Ebelhar M W. Nutrient uptake of maize affected by nitrogen and potassium fertility in a humid subtropical environment. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 2006, 37: 275–293
Li H, Huang G, Meng Q, et al. Integrated soil and plant phosphorus management for crop and environment in China. Plant Soil, 2011, 349: 157–167
Cordell D, Drangert J O, White S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob Environ Change, 2009, 19: 292–305
Stukenholtz D D, Olsen R J, Gogan G, et al. On the mechanism of phosphorus-zinc interaction in corn nutrition. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc, 1966, 30: 759–763
Ryan M H, McInerney J K, Record I R, et al. Zinc bioavailability in wheat grain in relation to phosphorus fertiliser, crop sequence and mycorrhizal fungi. J Sci Food Agric, 2008, 88: 1208–1216
Fan M S, Zhao F J, Fairweather-Tait S J, et al. Evidence of decreasing mineral density in wheat grain over the last 160 years. J Trace Elem Med Bio, 2008, 22: 315–324
Pleijel H, Danielsson H. Yield dilution of grain Zn in wheat grown in open-top chamber experiments with elevated CO2 and O3 exposure. J Cereal Sci, 2009, 50: 278–282
Kutman U, Yildiz B, Cakmak I. Effect of nitrogen on uptake, remobilization and partitioning of zinc and iron throughout the development of durum wheat. Plant Soil, 2011, 342: 149–164
Cakmak I, Kalayci M, Kaya Y, et al. Biofortification and localization of zinc in wheat grain. J Agric Food Chem, 2010, 58: 9092–9102
Peterson C J, Johnson V A, Mattern P J. Evaluation of variation in mineral element concentrations in wheat-flour and bran of different cultivars. Cereal Chem, 1983, 60: 450–455
Calderini D F, Ortiz-Monasterio I. Grain position affects grain macronutrient and micronutrient concentrations in wheat. Crop Sci, 2003, 43: 141–151
Shi R L, Weber G, Koster J, et al. Senescence-induced iron mobilization in source leaves of barley (Hordeum vulgare) plants. New Phytol, 2012, 195: 372–383
Uauy C, Distelfeld A, Fahima T, et al. A NAC gene regulating senescence improves grain protein, zinc, and iron content in wheat. Science, 2006, 314: 1298–1300
Oikeh S O, Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, et al. Genotypic differences in concentration and bioavailability of kernel-iron in tropical maize varieties grown under field conditions. J Plant Nutr, 2003, 26: 2307–2319
Oikeh S O, Menkir A, Maziya-Dixon B, et al. Environmental stability of iron and zinc concentrations in grain of elite early-maturing tropical maize genotypes grown under field conditions. J Agric Sci, 2004, 142: 543–551
He P, Jin J, Lin B. Effect of nitrogen application rates on leaf senescence and its mechanism in spring maize (Zea mays L.) (in Chinese). Sci Agric Sin, 1998, 31: 66–71
Li L, Sun J H, Zhang F S. Intercropping with wheat leads to greater root weight density and larger below-ground space of irrigated maize at late growth stages. Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 2011, 57: 61–67
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Xia, H., Zhao, J., Sun, J. et al. Maize grain concentrations and above-ground shoot acquisition of micronutrients as affected by intercropping with turnip, faba bean, chickpea, and soybean. Sci. China Life Sci. 56, 823–834 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4524-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-013-4524-y