Abstract
Emotion (i.e., spontaneous motivation and subsequent implementation of a behavior) and cognition (i.e., problem solving by information processing) are essential to how we, as humans, respond to changes in our environment. Recent studies in cognitive science suggest that emotion and cognition are subserved by different, although heavily integrated, neural systems. Understanding the time-varying relationship of emotion and cognition is a challenging goal with important implications for neuroscience. We formulate here the dynamical model of emotion-cognition interaction that is based on the following principles: (1) the temporal evolution of cognitive and emotion modes are captured by the incoming stimuli and competition within and among themselves (competition principle); (2) metastable states exist in the unified emotion-cognition phase space; and (3) the brain processes information with robust and reproducible transients through the sequence of metastable states. Such a model can take advantage of the often ignored temporal structure of the emotion-cognition interaction to provide a robust and generalizable method for understanding the relationship between brain activation and complex human behavior. The mathematical image of the robust and reproducible transient dynamics is a Stable Heteroclinic Sequence (SHS), and the Stable Heteroclinic Channels (SHCs). These have been hypothesized to be possible mechanisms that lead to the sequential transient behavior observed in networks. We investigate the modularity of SHCs, i.e., given a SHS and a SHC that is supported in one part of a network, we study conditions under which the SHC pertaining to the cognition will continue to function in the presence of interfering activity with other parts of the network, i.e., emotion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abeles, M., Bergman, H., Gat, I., Meilijson, I., Seidemann, E., Tishby, N., et al. (1995). Cortical activity flips among quasi-stationary states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 92, 8616–8620.
Abott, L. F. (2008). Theoretical neuroscience rising. Neuron, 60, 489–495.
Adolphs, R. (2008). Fear, faces, and the human amygdala. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 18, 166–172.
Afraimovich, V. S., Rabinovich, M. I., & Varona, P. (2004). Heteroclinic contours in neural ensembles and the winnerless competition principle. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 14, 1195–1208.
Afraimovich, V. S., Zhigulin, V. P., & Rabinovich, M. I. (2004). On the origin of reproducible sequential activity in neural circuits. Chaos, 14, 1123–1129.
Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist, 13, 214–228.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (2000). Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 295–307.
beim Graben, P., & Potthast, R. (2009). Inverse problems in dynamic cognitive modeling. Chaos, 19, 015103.
Buzsaki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.
Buzsaki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science, 304, 1926–1929.
Chen, Y., Bressler, S. L., & Ding, M. (2009). Dynamics on networks: assessing functional connectivity with Granger causality. Comput. Math. Organ. Theor., 15, 329–350.
Fales, C. L., Barch, D. B., Rundle, M. M., Mintun, M. A., Snyder, A. Z., Cohen, J. D., et al. (2008). Altered emotional interference processing in affective and cognitive-control brain circuitry in major depression. Biol. Psychiatry, 63, 377–384.
Fenicchel, N. (1971). Persistence and smoothness of invariant manifolds for flows. Indiana Univ. Math J., 21, 193–226.
Fingelkurts, A. A., & Fingelkurts, A. A. (2006). Timing in cognition and EEG brain dynamics: discreteness versus continuity. Cogn. Process., 7, 135–162.
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., van Essen, D., & Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 9673–9678.
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., & Raichle, M. E. (2007). Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron, 56, 171–184.
Friston, K. J. (1997). Transients, metastability, and neuronal dynamics. NeuroImage, 5, 164–171.
Friston, K. J. (2000). The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 355, 215–236.
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage, 19, 1273–1302.
Gray, J. R., Braver, T. S., & Raichle, M. E. (2002). Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 4115–4120.
Hale, J. (1969). Ordinary differential equations. New York: Interscience.
Hirsh, M. W., Pugh, C. C., & Shub, M. (1977). Lecture notes in math. : Vol. 583. Invariant manifolds. New York: Springer.
Huber, M. T., Braun, H. A., & Krieg, J.-C. (2001). On the impact of episode sensitization on the course of recurrent affective disorders. J. Pshychiatric Res., 35, 49–57.
Huber, M. T., Braun, H. A., & Krieg, J.-C. (2004). Recurrent affective disorders: nonlinear and stochastic models of disease dynamics. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 14, 635–652.
Ito, J., Nikolaev, A. R., & van Leeuwen, C. (2007). Dynamics of spontaneous transitions between global brain states. Hum. Brain Mapp., 28, 904–913.
Jones, L. M., Fonranini, A., Sadacca, B. F., Miller, P., & Katz, D. B. (2007). Natural stimuli evoke dynamic sequences of states in sensory cortical ensembles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104, 18772–18777.
Just, M. A., & Varma, S. (2007). The organization of thinking: What functional brain imaging reveals about theneuroarchitecture of complex cognition. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 7, 153–191.
Kaplan, A. Y., & Shishkin, S. L. (2000). Application of the change-point analysis to the investigation of the brain’s electrical activity. In B. E. Brodsky & B. S. Darkhovsky (Eds.), Nonparametric statistical diagnosis: problems and methods (pp. 333–388). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kifer, Y. (1981). The exit problem for small random perturbations of dynamical systems with hyperbolic fixed point. Isr. J. Math., 40, 74–96.
Levi, R., Varona, P., Arshavsky, Y. I., Rabinovich, M. I., & Selverston, A. I. (2004). Dual sensory-motor function for a molluskan statocyst network. J. Neurophysiol., 91, 336–345.
Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2008). Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Lewis, M. D. (2005). Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behav. Brain Sci., 28, 169–245.
Muezzinoglu, M. K., Tristan, I., Huerta, R., Afraimovich, V., & Rabinovich, M. I. (2010). Transients versus attractors in complex networks. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos, 20, 169–245.
Murray, J. D. (2002). Mathematical biology: I. An introduction (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
Oullier, O., & Kelso, J. A. (2006). Neuroeconomics and the metastable brain. Trends Cogn., 10, 353–354.
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 9, 148–158.
Phelps, E. (2006). Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 57, 27–53.
Port, R. F., & van Gelder, T. (Eds.) (1995). Mind as motion: explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rabinovich, M. I., Huerta, R., & Laurent, G. (2008). Transient dynamics for neural processing. Science, 321, 48–50.
Rabinovich, M. I., Huerta, R., Varona, P., & Afraimovich, V. S. (2008). Transient cognitive dynamics, metastability, and decision making. PLoS Computational Biology, 4, e1000072.
Rabinovich, M. I., Varona, P., Selverston, A. I., & Abarbanel, H. D. I. (2006). Dynamical principles in neuroscience. Rev. Modern Phys., 78, 1213.
Rabinovich, M. I., Volkovskii, A., Lecanda, P., Huerta, R., Abarbanel, H. D. I., & Laurent, G. (2001). Dynamical encoding by networks of competing neuron groups: winnerless competition. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 068102.
Reis, D. L., Shamosh, N. A., Kiehl, K. A., Brackett, M., Salovey, P., & Gray, J. R. (2007). Individual differences in emotional intelligence predict prefrontal cortical activity during social reasoning. NeuroImage, 35, 1385–1391.
Sasaki, T., Matsuki, N., & Ikegaya, Y. (2007). Metastability of active CA3 networks. J. Neurosci., 27, 517–528.
Scherer, K. R. (1993). Neuroscience projections to current debates in emotion psychology. Cognit. Emotion, 7, 1–41.
Shilnikov, L. P., Shilnikov, A. L., Turaev, D. V., & Chua, L. O. (1998). Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics (Part 1). Singapore: World Scientific.
Shilnikov, L. P., Shilnikov, A. L., Turaev, D. V., & Chua, L. O. (2001). Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics (Part 2). Singapore: World Scientific.
Stone, E., & Holmes, P. (1990). Random perturbations of heteroclinic attractors. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 50, 726–743.
Vogels, T. P., Rajan, K., & Abott, L. F. (2005). Neural network dynamics. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 28, 357–376.
Werner, G. (2007). Metastability, criticality and phase transitions in brain and its models. Biosystems, 90, 496–508.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Afraimovich, V., Young, T., Muezzinoglu, M.K. et al. Nonlinear Dynamics of Emotion-Cognition Interaction: When Emotion Does not Destroy Cognition?. Bull Math Biol 73, 266–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9572-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-010-9572-x