Abstract
Rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque of the carotid artery is an important underlying cause of clinical ischemic events, such as stroke. Abundant microvasculature has been identified as an important aspect contributing to plaque vulnerability. Plaque microvasculature can be studied non-invasively with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-)MRI in animals and patients. In recent years, several DCE-MRI studies have been published evaluating the association between microvasculature and other key features of plaque vulnerability (e.g., inflammation and intraplaque hemorrhage), as well as the effects of novel therapeutic interventions. The present paper reviews this literature, focusing on DCE-MRI methods of acquisition and analysis of atherosclerotic plaques, the current state and future potential of DCE-MRI in the evaluation of plaque microvasculature in clinical and preclinical settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque is an important underlying cause of clinical ischemic events, such as stroke [1]. Therefore, visualization of vulnerable plaques may aid in the identification of patients who have an increased risk for a clinical event. Inflammatory cells play an important role during the development and progression of atherosclerosis [2]. Within atherosclerotic plaques, activated macrophages have a high metabolic rate, inducing hypoxia which stimulates the formation of new microvessels originating from the outer layer of the vessel wall, the adventitia [3, 4]. These newly formed microvessels generally have impaired endothelial integrity, which can lead to extravasation of inflammatory cells and erythrocytes from the microvessel lumen into plaque tissue [4]. Extravasation of erythrocytes is generally considered as an important contributing factor to intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) [5]. Because lipids constitute 40 % of the erythrocyte membrane [5], extravasation of erythrocytes leads to increased cholesterol deposition in the plaque tissue, which in turn stimulates further recruitment of inflammatory cells. All the above biological events, especially leaky plaque microvasculature, are considered key features in plaque destabilization [6].
The microvasculature in plaques are very small (up to ∼100 μm in diameter) but can be studied non-invasively by several imaging modalities, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) [7, 8], positron emission tomography (PET) [9–11], and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) [12]. MRI is a well-established imaging modality that can be used to visualize the main plaque components: areas of IPH, the lipid-rich necrotic core, and fibrous cap status [13–15]. Early studies developed MRI for the detection of morphological and chemical components by studying specimen from surgery (carotid endarterectomy (CEA)). These ex vivo specimens were advantageous for testing and developing MRI sequences, but the lack of blood precludes studying of the dynamics from DCE [16, 17].
In recent years, a number of studies have applied DCE-MRI to study atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature. The present paper reviews the current state and future potential of DCE-MRI in the evaluation of plaque microvasculature with applications in animals and patients. First, because the methods of DCE-MRI are now well-developed and widely applied but are not familiar to a general audience, we begin with principles and acquisition methods of DCE-MRI and methods for (semi)quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI data. Second, an overview is given of publications on DCE-MRI of plaque microvasculature (Table 1) used to study one of the following aspects: (1) associations between plaque microvasculature and other plaque features, (2) longitudinal changes in plaque microvasculature, (3) comparison of different animal groups and human subjects with a different cardiovascular risk profile, and (4) evaluation of therapy response. Finally, future challenges and potential for DCE-MRI to study plaque microvasculature will be discussed.
DCE-MRI Methods to Study Plaque Microvasculature
Principles of DCE-MRI
All DCE-MRI experiments require serial acquisition of MR images acquired in a brief time interval to study atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature (Fig. 1). After acquisition of anatomical references (Fig. 1a), the first images of the series, acquired before contrast injection, are used to determine baseline signal intensity of the atherosclerotic plaque tissue. Bolus injection of a low molecular weight non-specific Gadolinium-based contrast medium follows, and image acquisition is continued for several minutes. During this period, the bolus of contrast medium will be distributed, resulting in signal enhancement of the blood vessel lumen, vessel wall due to leakage of the contrast medium through damaged endothelial, and other tissues, such as skeletal muscle (Fig. 1b). In this image, the vessel lumen (circle) appears bright. A ring of enhancement in the outer (adventitial layer) part of the vessel wall (indicated by white arrows) can be clearly observed. The signal enhancement in the vessel wall depends on flow, microvascular density, the ability of the contrast medium to leak from the microvasculature into the extravascular extracellular space, and reflux. After analysis of the DCE-MR images, parametric maps (Fig. 1c) of the resulting parameter can be generated, indicating local leaky plaque microvasculature. In DCE-MRI studies of atherosclerosis to date, linear or cyclic Gadolinium-based contrast media have been used.
DCE-MRI studies of brain and tumor perfusion mostly use a contrast medium injection rate of 2 ml/s (typically 0.1 mmol/kg). Such fast injection rates result in quick passage of the bolus through the vessel and a high-contrast medium peak concentration, necessitating a higher temporal resolution for MR acquisition and compromising spatial resolution. For the evaluation of carotid atherosclerosis using DCE-MRI, however, high spatial resolution is required for accurate visualization of the vessel wall. Therefore, some DCE-MRI studies [24, 39] have used a slower injection rate of 0.5 ml/s in plaque imaging. Previous research has shown that a high injection rate is most beneficial for high Ktrans values (>0.2 min−1) [48]. Typically, within the atherosclerotic lesion, mean Ktrans values below 0.15 are reported [24], and therefore, a lower injection rate may be applied.
Signal enhancement-time curves of DCE-MR images can be analyzed voxelwise or using a region-of-interest. Especially in the voxelwise analysis, movement of the subject during acquisition of the different DCE-MRI sequence time frames may pose a problem. A solution is to manually shift individual time frames to correctly align the images, or alternatively, to use post-processing methods for automated movement correction and noise reduction [20, 22].
Pulse Sequences for DCE-MRI of Plaque Microvasculature
Currently, two main categories of pulse sequences for DCE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature are employed: “bright blood” or “black blood”. Black blood imaging facilitates improved delineation of the inner vessel wall, whereas bright blood imaging enables to determine the CM concentration in the vessel lumen for each patient individually. Because the luminal CM concentration cannot be quantified accurately, quantitative analysis of black blood DCE-MRI with pharmacokinetic models can only be performed using a reference region model [49] or previously determined generalized input functions [50]. Recently, dedicated imaging methods have been proposed combining bright and black blood images in an interleaved fashion, allowing improved delineation of the vessel wall from black blood images as well as extraction of vascular input function based on lumen signal intensity from bright blood images [25, 28••].
A compromise between the desired spatial and the required temporal resolution must be made regardless of the imaging method used. Current studies (both in rabbits and patients) employed an in-plane spatial acquisition resolution of approximately 0.5 × 0.5 mm2. The preclinical rabbit studies have employed a temporal resolution of 5 s for 2D acquisition techniques and lower temporal resolution (30 s) for 3D techniques. In patient studies, the temporal resolution ranges from 15 to 30 s per time frame.
Semi-Quantitative Assessment of the Microvasculature
The microvasculature can be assessed semi-quantitatively using the area-under-the-curve (AUC) of the (relative) signal enhancement curve. This requires that start- and end-time points are selected over which the AUC will be calculated. Generally, the moment of contrast arrival in the tissue of interest is chosen as the starting point, and the end time point is chosen empirically. It must be noted that when the end point is chosen relatively close to the contrast injection, the AUC reflects early contrast arrival, whereas a later end point will cause the AUC to reflect total leakage (and entrapment) of contrast medium in the plaque tissue.
The main advantage of semi-quantitative analyses is the relatively easy implementation. However, the information is limited because there is no direct relationship between the AUC and (patho)physiological parameters. Although research in the field of oncology [51] has shown that the AUC reflects pathophysiology, it does so non-specifically, meaning that one particular AUC value can indicate a number of biological properties. Thus, an increased AUC can indicate increased leakage of the contrast medium from the microvasculature, increased density of microvessels, increased flow through the microvasculature, a decrease in reflux from the extracellular extravascular space to the microvasculature, or a combination of these. Therefore, changes or differences in the AUC may result from a variety of phenomena so that it may be difficult to attribute these changes to a single, underlying physiological cause. Similarly, effects of therapeutic interventions may potentially be obscured using the AUC. Another drawback of semi-quantitative analysis is the difficulty of direct comparison of results between studies because the AUC also depend on settings of the MR system, such as receiver gain.
Validation of Semi-Quantitative DCE-MRI Parameters
Validation of semi-quantitative DCE-MRI was performed in several balloon injured cholesterol-fed New Zealand White rabbit studies. It was found that the AUC positively correlated with microvessel count in the intima of histological specimens (Pearson’s ρ of 0.89 (p = 0.016) and 0.91 (p = 0.011) for the AUC 2 and 7 min after contrast injection, respectively) [29]. Furthermore, later research [27] showed a good interscan and excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility (all ICCs > 0.75, p < 0.01).
Another atherosclerotic rabbit study compared two three-dimensional (3D) high spatial resolution DCE-MRI sequences (3D turbo field echo (TFE) with motion-sensitized-driven equilibrium (MSDE) preparation and a 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence) [30•]. A moderate Pearson correlation was found between AUC and ex vivo permeability measurements using Evans Blue (an albumin-binding dye used for quantification of ex vivo vascular permeability) near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) (ρ = 0.45 for 3D TFE MRI and ρ = 0.39 for 3D TSE MRI). In addition, a fourfold improvement of temporal resolution was achieved when using compressed sensing by retrospective undersampling and reconstruction. In another study, comparison between in vivo (3D DCE-MRI) and ex vivo (Cy7-labeled near-infrared fluorescence [NIRF]) measures of microvascular permeability in the aortic wall of atherosclerotic rabbits showed a high degree of correlation between both imaging modalities (r 2 = 0.65, p < 0.0001) [32].
These studies [27, 29, 30•, 32] have demonstrated reproducible representation of plaque microvasculature through semi-quantitative DCE-MRI parameters.
Quantitative Assessment of the Microvasculature
Pharmacokinetic Modeling
Pharmacokinetic modeling allows the quantification of contrast medium distribution over a tissue of interest with the main advantage of deriving parameters of the in vivo physical quantities of the amount, flow, and leakiness of the microvasculature.
A number of quantitative DCE-MRI data analysis models have been applied in the evaluation of atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature (Table 2). These models describe the relationship between the concentration of the (extracellular) contrast medium in the blood plasma (Cp) and the extracellular extravascular space (Ce) according to the two-compartment model and using the parameters Ktrans, ve, and vp. Ktrans, the transfer constant of contrast medium from plasma to the tissue compartment, serves as an indicator of blood supply and vessel permeability within the atherosclerotic tissue. The parameters ve and vp represent the extravascular extracellular space and the plasma fractional volume, respectively. A schematic representation of the physiological meaning of the parameters is shown in Fig. 2.
The modified/extended Tofts and Kermode (TK) model [52, 53] is a commonly employed analytical solution for the two-compartment model [54, 55], estimating all three pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, ve, and vp). The original TK model, which was proposed for the study of multiple sclerosis [56], does not take vascular contribution into account (i.e., vp is assumed to be negligible). The Patlak model [57] assumes that reflux, i.e., transfer of contrast medium from the tissue compartment back to the blood plasma (Ktrans/ve), is negligible. Recently, an approximation of the modified TK model has been introduced as an intermediate solution between the modified TK and the Patlak model: the extended graphical model [23]. This model uses the first-order term of a Taylor series from the modified TK model to estimate ve.
Vascular Input Function
One essential requirement for quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI data is knowledge of the contrast medium concentration in the blood vessel over time, commonly, referred to as the arterial or vascular input function (AIF/VIF). Two main features of the VIF are a high relative peak concentration and a short bolus passage compared to other tissues. Accurate determination of the VIF requires a relatively high temporal resolution, which usually results in compromise with regard to the spatial resolution that can be achieved.
Two strategies can be employed for the determination of VIF. The first strategy is based on the assumption that VIF is similar in all subjects and a generalized population-averaged VIF, obtained from literature or determined in a cohort is used [24, 39, 46, 50]. An advantage of this method is that data acquisition and analysis requirements are simplified [49]. The second strategy involves measurement of patient-specific function, giving the potential advantage of accounting for variations between subjects [58]. Previous research in oncology found comparable results using either method, and the use of population-averaged vascular input functions resulted in increased [50] or comparable [59] reproducibility. In clinical studies of atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature, a generalized VIF is the most commonly chosen method, probably because of the required spatial resolution for accurate imaging of atherosclerotic plaque in the carotid artery. The generalized VIF can be obtained from a separate study cohort where acquisition is performed with a higher temporal resolution and a lower spatial resolution.
The VIF with MRI can be calculated by two different methods. The first method uses the magnitude of the acquired MR signal and is based on conversion of the relative signal enhancement to contrast medium concentration using the Ernst equation [60]. For this conversion, blood relaxation and contrast medium relaxivity rates are taken into account. A second method based on MR signal phase has been developed more recently [61, 62]. First used in brain perfusion studies with dynamic susceptibility MRI [63], the technique is increasingly used in DCE-MRI [24, 64]. Efforts have been made to compare the magnitude- and phase-based techniques [24, 59, 65–67], showing a strong potential for the phase-based technique, allowing accurate VIF quantification. In a DCE-MRI study of 17 symptomatic patients with a mild to severe carotid stenosis, it was found that the magnitude-based VIF resulted in a strong underestimation of lumen contrast medium concentration as compared to the phase-based VIF [24]. Simulations and phantom experiments showed that this underestimation is caused by local blood flow velocity, which leads to saturation of the magnitude MR signal caused by the shortened T1 relaxation time in the presence of contrast medium. Analysis of Ktrans values using population-averaged input functions showed a strong positive correlation between the two methods, although absolute values significantly differed.
Validation of Quantitative DCE-MRI Parameters
Histological validation of carotid plaque DCE-MRI has been carried out using reference specimens from patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, the drawback of all such validation studies is that these are performed in patients scheduled for CEA. Large randomized trials have shown that symptomatic patients with severe ipsilateral stenosis benefit the most from CEA [68]. This population is more likely to have developed advanced atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, the surgeon removes the intima and part of the media of the vessel wall and the adventitia, from which microvasculature originates [6], is missing in the CEA specimen. An additional limitation of the comparison of in vivo MRI with histological measurements as a reference standard is the comparison of a thin histological slice to thicker MR imaging slice (typically 2 mm). Due to the heterogeneous nature of atherosclerotic lesions, this may result in partial volume effects.
Despite these drawbacks, a strong and positive correlation between fractional blood volume derived from in vivo MRI and post-surgical histology (0.80, p < 0.001) was found in 16 CEA patients [40]. In addition, a significant Pearson correlation was reported between the transfer constants Ktrans calculated from in vivo DCE-MRI with postsurgical histologic measurements of the microvessel area (ρ = 0.71, p < 0.001 for the entire vessel wall Ktrans and ρ = 0.41, p < 0.04 for adventitial Ktrans). Additionally, an association between Ktrans and other postsurgical histological parameters was reported, i.e., macrophage density (ρ = 0.75, p < 0.001 for the vessel wall Ktrans and ρ = 0.49, p < 0.01 for adventitial Ktrans), loose matrix area (ρ = 0.50, p = 0.01, for vessel wall Ktrans) [41, 42]. It was also shown that Ktrans and vp differed significantly between different plaque components (lipid core, IPH, calcifications, loose matrix, and fibrous tissue), except between calcifications and IPH [36].
Reproducibility, fit error, parameter uncertainty, and correlation with histology of carotid plaque DCE-MRI were compared for four pharmacokinetic models in patients with mild to severe carotid stenosis [39]. Analysis of 43 patients showed the highest relative fit error for the Tofts model, while the other three models did not differ in this regard. The Patlak model had a significant lower parameter uncertainty for Ktrans as compared to the other models. Reproducibility was studied in 16 asymptomatic patients with 30–69 % carotid stenosis who underwent imaging twice with several (4.3 ± 2.8) days between the two examinations. Results showed a good reproducibility for all considered pharmacokinetic models (ICC > 0.6, p < 0.05) for Ktrans and significant scan-rescan ICCs for ve (Tofts) and vp (Patlak). Correlation with histologic findings in 13 CEA patients showed significant positive Pearson’s correlation (ρ = 0.7; p < 0.01) with the entire vessel wall microvasculature for all models, with the exception of the Tofts model. It was concluded that the Patlak model was the most suited of these four models for pharmacokinetic modeling of the microvasculature in atherosclerotic plaques [39]. Another study [23], however, found favorable results for the extended graphical model for simulated and selected in vivo data of carotid plaques with good to excellent image quality. Their results showed that a compromise between noise and bias sensitivity has to be made when choosing between the Patlak and extended graphical models.
The scan-rescan reproducibility of DCE-MRI was also investigated in a multi-center study [18] of 35 subjects with established cardiovascular disease recruited from 15 hospitals. Results showed a moderate reproducibility for Ktrans with a coefficient of variation of 25 %. The relatively high dropout rate within the study (31.4 %) suggested a need for intensive operator training, an optimized imaging protocol, and quality control.
The dependence of model parameters on contrast medium was investigated in a study comparing two extracellular contrast media [21]. Quantitative analysis of DCE-MR images demonstrated a lower Ktrans when using gadobenate dimeglumine (0.0846 min−1) as compared to gadodiamide (0.101 min−1, p < 0.01), while no difference in vp was found. In order to facilitate direct comparison of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters between- or in longitudinal studies, the use of the same contrast medium is recommended.
Taken together, despite the recognized limitations, the above studies demonstrate the suitability of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters for reproducibly determining plaque microvasculature characteristics.
Overview of DCE MRI Studies to Study Plaque Microvasculature
Association Between DCE-MRI Parameters and Other Plaque Features
Many plaque characteristics and pathological features contribute to the risk for disruption and thrombosis, and studies have been designed to investigate possible associations between plaque microvasculature and other plaque features. In recent years, several studies [31, 37, 45•, 46, 47•] were carried out to investigate associations between DCE-MRI parameters, plaque inflammation, and the presence of IPH. In a preclinical study of cholesterol-fed balloon-injured atherosclerotic rabbits [31], a positive Pearson correlation (ρ = 0.70, p = 0.01) was found between DCE-MRI derived parameters and histologically determined plaque macrophage content.
The relationship between DCE-MRI parameters and plaque inflammation using 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET-computed tomography (CT) has been investigated in several clinical studies [37, 46, 47•]. One study of 49 symptomatic patients with mild to moderate carotid stenosis [46] reported a weak positive correlation (Spearman ρ = 0.30, p = 0.035) between plaque inflammation (mean Target-to-Background Ratio (TBR) on 18F-FDG PET-CT) and plaque perfusion (mean Ktrans). Another study of 33 patients [37] with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalent and a carotid plaque with TBR ≥ 1.6 on 18F-FDG PET-CT [69] found a significant inverse relationship between plaque perfusion (Ktrans) and plaque inflammation on 18F-FDG PET-CT of ρ = -0.24 (p < 0.05). A subsequent study of 41 patients with carotid plaque [47•] found that correlations depend on the clinical condition of patients. Overall, a weak, marginal non-significant correlation (Spearman ρ = 0.22, p = 0.068) was found for all, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, carotid plaques. A significant difference in Spearman correlation coefficients between TBR and Ktrans was found when grouped according to the symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid plaques (p = 0.033): a significant correlation (Spearman ρ = 0.59, p = 0.006) was found for symptomatic carotid plaques, not seen for asymptomatic plaques (Spearman ρ = 0.07, p = 0.625). Also, an inverse relationship was found between the time since the last neurological event and both parameters (Spearman ρ = −0.94 for TBR and Spearman ρ = −0.69 for Ktrans). These results point towards a complex interplay between inflammation and microvasculature in atherosclerotic plaques that is difficult to capture in clinical imaging.
The link between plaque microvasculature and the specific feature of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) has been investigated in symptomatic patients with moderate to severe carotid stenosis [45•]. The presence of IPH on MP-RAGE MR images was associated with a significant increase in Ktrans of 28 % (p < 0.001) in the adventitial layer of the vessel wall as compared to arteries where IPH was absent (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis adjusting for symptomatic status, degree of stenosis, and male sex showed that the increased Ktrans in arteries with IPH remained significant (p = 0.018).
These studies show the potential of DCE-MRI as a tool to gain more insight in relation between plaque microvasculature and other features of vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions.
Monitoring Longitudinal Changes in Plaque Microvasculature
DCE-MRI can be used to follow progression of atherosclerotic plaques, as illustrated by a preclinical study [31] of cholesterol-fed atherosclerotic rabbits. One group of rabbits was imaged 3 months after balloon denudation, immediately followed by euthanasia, and a second group at 3 and 6 months after balloon denudation. From 3 to 6 months after balloon denudation, an increase of 40 % in Ktrans was found measured by DCE-MRI, suggesting that DCE-MRI can be used to investigate plaque microvasculature development.
Differences Between Different Animal Groups and Human Subjects with a Different Cardiovascular Risk Profile
In a recent rabbit study [32], investigating the development of a microfluidic chip for potential future nanomedicines an increased AUC within the abdominal aorta for atherosclerotic animals as compared to control animals was reported. In another study of cholesterol-fed rabbits with induced plaque disruption [26], it was shown that ruptured plaques can be distinguished from stable plaques by spatial-temporal texture-based features of DCE-MRI. The effect of exposure to high particulate airborne matter on atherosclerosis was investigated in “Ground Zero” workers in New York City with high and low exposure to particulate matter using DCE-MRI [43]. Subjects with high exposure had a significantly higher AUC in the carotid artery (+41 %) as compared to subjects with low exposure (p = 0.016), indicating increased changes of the plaque microvasculature. These changes may range from increased leakage of contrast medium from the microvasculature, increased microvessel density, increased flow through the microvasculature, decreased reflux from the extracellular extravascular space to the microvasculature, or a combination. The authors of the study concluded that a high exposure to particulate matter may lead to increased plaque microvasculature, potentially indicating an increased risk for further development of atherosclerosis.
Evaluation of Therapies
DCE-MRI enables the study of plaque microvasculature changes over time, making it useful in animal and patient drug effect studies. Changes in microvasculature may reflect changes in phenotype and/or vulnerability of the atherosclerotic plaque.
DCE-MRI has been employed in several preclinical cholesterol-fed balloon-injured atherosclerotic rabbit studies investigating potential anti-inflammatory treatments of atherosclerosis [33–35]. The effect of liposome-encapsulated prednisolone phosphate (L-PLP) on atherosclerosis was investigated using MR imaging before treatment, immediately after injection with L-PLP, and over time [33]. A reduction of the plaque AUC was found from pre-treatment to 2 days post-treatment, revealing early changes in microvascular permeability after treatment. In a further study, the anti-inflammatory effects of pioglitazone on atherosclerotic plaques were investigated [34]. DCE-MRI analysis showed a 22 % decrease in AUC for the treatment group (p < 0.01) over the study time period of 3 months, while no decrease in plaque enhancement was found for the control group. No changes in vessel wall area measurements were found during the study period for either animal group. A third study [35] evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of a liver X receptor (LXR) agonist which induces reversal cholesterol transport, as compared to atorvastatin. The 3-month treatment with LXR did not lead to changes of the microvasculature, whereas treatment with atorvastatin caused a trend towards a decrease in microvasculature (p = 0.06). No differences in vessel wall area measurements were found. Combined, these studies have shown the potential of DCE-MRI to study changes of the plaque microvasculature in the evaluation of potential new therapies. A limitation of these studies, however, is that the rabbits did not exhibit plaque disruption with luminal thrombosis, the clinical endpoint of high risk plaques.
DCE-MRI has been used to study the effect of intensive lipid therapy over a period of 12 months [38] in patients with coronary artery disease or carotid disease and increased levels (≥120 mg/dl) of apolipoprotein B from the Carotid Plaque Composition study [70]. Results of the study show that 12-month therapy leads to a significant reduction of 21 % in Ktrans. This is consistent with the hypothesis that intensive lipid therapy results in a reduction of the extent and permeability of atherosclerotic plaque microvasculature. A study with 98 subjects with established cardiovascular disease [44••] selected from the AIM-HIGH trial [19] found an inverse association between vp (plaque microvasculature fraction) and the duration of statin therapy. Statins are commonly used to lower lipid levels and also possess anti-inflammatory properties [71]. These results suggest that a relationship exists between duration of statin therapy and plaque microvasculature, which could reflect a decreased level of vascular inflammation.
The above studies on DCE-MRI of plaque microvasculature have measured differences between treatment groups or subjects with increased cardiovascular risk and shown that DCE-MRI can be employed effectively as an evaluation tool.
Challenges and Future Perspectives in DCE-MRI of Atherosclerosis
To further advance DCE-MRI for wider use in clinical practice, uniform acquisition and analysis methods need to be agreed upon. Previous studies have shown that DCE-MRI-derived parameters are influenced by the contrast medium, vascular input function, and which pharmacokinetic model is used, making direct cross-study comparisons difficult. Use of a standard imaging and data analysis protocol is essential, therefore, for longitudinal studies of plaque microvasculature. A very important clinical precaution is use of a stable Gadolinium-based contrast medium [72] using low dosages to minimize the risks for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and deposition of the contrast medium in the brain.
The recent introduction of interleaved acquisition methods [28••], providing both bright and black blood images, may be an important step toward the determination of an individualized vascular input function. In addition, 3D acquisition techniques [30•] may provide increased spatial accuracy as compared to currently employed 2D techniques, although at the expense of temporal resolution. Currently, these 3D acquisition techniques have only been explored in preclinical rabbit studies; their potential in clinical studies remains to be investigated.
All clinical DCE-MRI studies, to date, have been performed at 1.5 and 3.0 T. The potential of carotid MRI at 7.0 T has already been explored [73, 74], and results show a potential increase in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to the increased field strength. However, the increase in SNR may be diminished by increased relaxivity of the contrast medium, which may also require longer scan times. The potentially increased SNR at 7.0 T would allow increased spatial and/or temporal resolution, but these studies also demonstrate that further technical developments are required to enable complete plaque characterization.
Associations between plaque microvasculature (measured using DCE-MRI) and plaque inflammation (measured by 18F-FDG uptake or macrophage content) remain an important area to be studied further since varying results have been reported to date. The reported association between and plaque microvasculature and intraplaque hemorrhage could be studied longitudinally. The recent introduction of hybrid PET-MRI systems provides excellent opportunities for further investigation of the relationships between these processes using a single imaging system. Recent research [75–79] has already shown the potential of hybrid PET-MR systems for the imaging of atherosclerosis. However, the additional value of DCE-MRI in PET/MR imaging is yet to be explored.
The predictive value of DCE-MRI for plaque progression or development of vulnerable plaque features is of great interest and remains to be determined; in addition, its predictive value for cerebrovascular ischemic events needs to be investigated in a prospective clinical trial.
Applications of DCE-MRI can be extended beyond the carotid artery to other (human) vascular territories, such as the microvasculature in the aortic wall of abdominal aortic aneurysms [80, 81]. These measurements were reproducible with a high technical success rate, and the Patlak model was the most suited pharmacokinetic model. Future studies are warranted to investigate the predictive potential of DCE-MRI derived parameters for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.
Conclusion
Over the past decade, DCE-MRI has developed from a novel imaging tool to a useful non-invasive research tool used in animal and patient studies of plaque microvasculature. DCE-MRI has been used to investigate the relationship between plaque microvasculature and other plaque features such as inflammation and intraplaque hemorrhage, for assessing effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, and in the evaluation of plaque microvasculature changes over time and between groups with increased cardiovascular risks. Future studies could apply DCE-MRI to elucidate plaque development mechanisms, specifically the interplay between inflammation, increased microvasculature, and intraplaque hemorrhage. Also of great interest is the potential predictive value of plaque microvasculature DCE-MRI for plaque progression and future cerebrovascular ischemic events (such as stroke).
Search Strategy
The studies discussed in the present review have been identified through a database search in MEDLINE in December 2015 using the following search terms: “carotid atherosclerosis”/“atherosclerosis”/“atherosclerotic plaque”/“atherosclerotic plaques”/“plaque” AND “human”/“rabbit” AND “DCE-MRI”/“dynamic contrast enhanced MRI”/“MRI”/“dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging”/“magnetic resonance imaging” AND “neovessels”/“neovascularization”/“neovasculature”/“vasa vasorum”/“microvasculature”/“inflammation”. Resulting abstracts and articles were screened and references checked for possible additional studies.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Chaturvedi S, Bruno A, Feasby T, Holloway R, Benavente O, Cohen SN, et al. Carotid endarterectomy—an evidence-based review: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;65(6):794–801.
Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145(3):341–55.
Sluimer JC, Gasc JM, van Wanroij JL, Kisters N, Groeneweg M, Sollewijn Gelpke MD, et al. Hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, and macrophages in human atherosclerotic plaques are correlated with intraplaque angiogenesis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(13):1258–65.
Sluimer JC, Daemen MJ. Novel concepts in atherogenesis: angiogenesis and hypoxia in atherosclerosis. J Pathol. 2009;218(1):7–29.
Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(24):2316–25.
Moreno PR, Purushothaman K-R, Sirol M, Levy AP, Fuster V. Neovascularization in human atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2006;113(18):2245–52.
Staub D, Schinkel AF, Coll B, Coli S, van der Steen AF, Reed JD, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the vasa vasorum: from early atherosclerosis to the identification of unstable plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):761–71.
Shalhoub J, Owen DR, Gauthier T, Monaco C, Leen EL, Davies AH. The use of contrast enhanced ultrasound in carotid arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(4):381–7.
Beer AJ, Pelisek J, Heider P, Saraste A, Reeps C, Metz S, et al. PET/CT imaging of integrin alphavbeta3 expression in human carotid atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(2):178–87.
Golestani R, Zeebregts CJ, van Scheltinga AG T, Lub-de Hooge MN, van Dam GM, Glaudemans AW, et al. Feasibility of vascular endothelial growth factor imaging in human atherosclerotic plaque using (89)Zr-bevacizumab positron emission tomography. Mol Imaging. 2013;12(4):235–43.
Golestani R, Mirfeizi L, Zeebregts CJ, Westra J, de Haas HJ, Glaudemans AW, et al. Feasibility of [18F]-RGD for ex vivo imaging of atherosclerosis in detection of alphavbeta3 integrin expression. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015.
Calcagno C, Mani V, Ramachandran S, Fayad ZA. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of atherosclerotic plaque angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2010;13(2):87–99.
Yuan C, Kerwin WS, Yarnykh VL, Cai J, Saam T, Chu B, et al. MRI of atherosclerosis in clinical trials. NMR Biomed. 2006;19(6):636–54.
Kwee RM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Hofstra L, Teule GJ, van Engelshoven JM, Mess WH, et al. Identifying vulnerable carotid plaques by noninvasive imaging. Neurology. 2008;70(24 Pt 2):2401–9.
Kwee RM, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, Prins MH, van der Geest RJ, ter Berg JWM, et al. MRI of carotid atherosclerosis to identify TIA and stroke patients who are at risk of a recurrence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012.
Toussaint JF, Southern JF, Fuster V, Kantor HL. T2-weighted contrast for NMR characterization of human atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15(10):1533–42.
Clarke SE, Hammond RR, Mitchell JR, Rutt BK. Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque composition using multicontrast MRI and registered histology. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50(6):1199–208.
Chen HJ, Sun J, Kerwin WS, Balu N, Neradilek MB, Hippe DS, et al. Scan-rescan reproducibility of quantitative assessment of inflammatory carotid atherosclerotic plaque using dynamic contrast-enhanced 3T CMR in a multi-center study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16(1):51.
Investigators A-H, Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255–67.
Kerwin WS, Cai J, Yuan C. Noise and motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for analysis of atherosclerotic lesions. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47(6):1211–7.
Kerwin WS, Zhao X, Yuan C, Hatsukami TS, Maravilla KR, Underhill HR, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of carotid atherosclerosis: dependence on contrast agent. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(1):35–40.
Ramachandran S, Calcagno C, Mani V, Robson PM, Fayad ZA. Registration of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the common carotid artery using a fixed-frame template-based squared-difference method. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(4):1017.
Chen H, Li F, Zhao X, Yuan C, Rutt B, Kerwin WS. Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(3):868–78.
van Hoof RH, Hermeling E, Truijman MT, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Daemen JW, van der Geest RJ, et al. Phase-based vascular input function: improved quantitative DCE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaques. Med Phys. 2015;42(8):4619.
Calcagno C, Robson PM, Ramachandran S, Mani V, Kotys-Traughber M, Cham M, et al. SHILO, a novel dual imaging approach for simultaneous HI-/LOw temporal (Low-/Hi-spatial) resolution imaging for vascular dynamic contrast enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance: numerical simulations and feasibility in the carotid arteries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson: Off J Soc Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:42.
Wan T, Madabhushi A, Phinikaridou A, Hamilton JA, Hua N, Pham T, et al. Spatio-temporal texture (SpTeT) for distinguishing vulnerable from stable atherosclerotic plaque on dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) MRI in a rabbit model. Med Phys. 2014;41(4).
Calcagno C, Vucic E, Mani V, Goldschlager G, Fayad ZA. Reproducibility of black blood dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in aortic plaques of atherosclerotic rabbits. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(1):191–8.
Wu T, Wang J, Song Y, Deng X, Li A, Wei J, et al. Homologous HOmologous Black-Bright-blood and flexible Interleaved imaging sequence (HOBBI) for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the vessel wall. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(5):1754–63. Application of interleaved acquisition methods for the simultaneous acquisition of black and bright blood MR images.
Calcagno C, Cornily JC, Hyafil F, Rudd JHF, Briley-Saebo KC, Mani V, et al. Detection of neovessels in atherosclerotic plaques of rabbits using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and 18F-FDG PET. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(7):1311–7.
Calcagno C, Lobatto ME, Dyvorne H, Robson PM, Millon A, Senders ML, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the accurate, extensive quantification of microvascular permeability in atherosclerotic plaques. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(10):1304–14. Application of three-dimensional acquisition techniques for quantification of plaque microvasculature in atherosclerotic rabbits.
Chen H, Ricks J, Rosenfeld M, Kerwin WS. Progression of experimental lesions of atherosclerosis: assessment by kinetic modeling of black-blood dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69(6):1712–20.
Kim Y, Lobatto ME, Kawahara T, Lee Chung B, Mieszawska AJ, Sanchez-Gaytan BL, et al. Probing nanoparticle translocation across the permeable endothelium in experimental atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(3):1078–83.
Lobatto ME, Fayad ZA, Silvera S, Vucic E, Calcagno C, Mani V, et al. Multimodal clinical imaging to longitudinally assess a nanomedical anti-inflammatory treatment in experimental atherosclerosis. Mol Pharm. 2010;7(6):2020–9.
Vucic E, Dickson SD, Calcagno C, Rudd JH, Moshier E, Hayashi K, et al. Pioglitazone modulates vascular inflammation in atherosclerotic rabbits noninvasive assessment with FDG-PET-CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(10):1100–9.
Vucic E, Calcagno C, Dickson SD, Rudd JH, Hayashi K, Bucerius J, et al. Regression of inflammation in atherosclerosis by the LXR agonist R211945: a noninvasive assessment and comparison with atorvastatin. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(8):819–28.
Chen H, Cai J, Zhao X, Underhill H, Ota H, Oikawa M, et al. Localized measurement of atherosclerotic plaque inflammatory burden with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(2):567–73.
Calcagno C, Ramachandran S, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Mani V, Millon A, Rosenbaum D, et al. The complementary roles of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT for imaging of carotid atherosclerosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(12):1884–93.
Dong L, Kerwin WS, Chen H, Chu B, Underhill HR, Neradilek MB, et al. Carotid artery atherosclerosis: effect of intensive lipid therapy on the vasa vasorum—evaluation by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2011;260(1):224–31.
Gaens ME, Backes WH, Rozel S, Lipperts M, Sanders SN, Jaspers K, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation. Radiology. 2013;266(1):271–9.
Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M, Vicini P, Ferguson M, Hatsukami T, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation. 2003;107(6):851–6.
Kerwin WS, O’Brien KD, Ferguson MS, Polissar N, Hatsukami TS, Yuan C. Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Study1. Radiology. 2006;241(2):459–68.
Kerwin WS, Oikawa M, Yuan C, Jarvik GP, Hatsukami TS. MR imaging of adventitial vasa vasorum in carotid atherosclerosis. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(3):507–14.
Mani V, Wong SK, Sawit ST, Calcagno C, Maceda C, Ramachandran S, et al. Relationship between particulate matter exposure and atherogenic profile in “Ground Zero” workers as shown by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(4):827–33.
O’Brien KD, Hippe DS, Chen H, Neradilek MB, Probstfield JL, Peck S, et al. Longer duration of statin therapy is associated with decreased carotid plaque vascularity by magnetic resonance imaging. Atherosclerosis. 2015;245:74–81. The effect of the duration of statin therapy on carotid plaque microvasculature.
Sun J, Song Y, Chen H, Kerwin WS, Hippe DS, Dong L, et al. Adventitial perfusion and intraplaque hemorrhage: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study in the carotid artery. Stroke. 2013;44(4):1031–6. Association between plaque microvasculature and the presence of intraplaque hemorrhage.
Truijman MT, Kwee RM, van Hoof RH, Hermeling E, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Mess WH, et al. Combined 18F-FDG PET-CT and DCE-MRI to assess inflammation and microvascularization in atherosclerotic plaques. Stroke. 2013;44(12):3568–70.
Wang J, Liu H, Sun J, Xue H, Xie L, Yu S, et al. Varying correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in carotid atherosclerosis: implications for plaque inflammation. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1842–5. Association between plaque microvasculature measured using DCE-MRI and plaque inflammation (measured using 18F-FDG PET/CT).
Aerts HJ, van Riel NA, Backes WH. System identification theory in pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: influence of contrast injection. Magn Reson Med. 2008;59(5):1111–9.
Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin PC, et al. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(4):519–29.
Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, et al. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56(5):993–1000.
Walker-Samuel S, Leach MO, Collins DJ. Evaluation of response to treatment using DCE-MRI: the relationship between initial area under the gadolinium curve (IAUGC) and quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(14):3593–602.
Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL, Evelhoch JL, Henderson E, Knopp MV, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10(3):223–32.
Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7(1):91–101.
O’Connor JP, Tofts PS, Miles KA, Parkes LM, Thompson G, Jackson A. Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging techniques: CT and MRI. Br J Radiol. 2011;84(Spec No 2):S112–20.
Ingrisch M, Sourbron S. Tracer-kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and CT: a primer. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2013;40(3):281–300.
Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med. 1991;17(2):357–67.
Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3(1):1–7.
van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Viergever MA, van der Grond J, Bakker CJ. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49(6):1067–76.
Cron GO, Wallace JC, Stevens WD, Fortin T, Pappas BA, Wilkins RC, et al. A comparison of T2*-weighted magnitude and phase imaging for measuring the arterial input function in the rat aorta following intravenous injection of gadolinium contrast agent. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;23(5):619–27.
Schabel MC, Parker DL. Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(9):2345–73.
Akbudak E, Norberg RE, Conturo TE. Contrast-agent phase effects: an experimental system for analysis of susceptibility, concentration, and bolus input function kinetics. Magn Reson Med. 1997;38(6):990–1002.
Akbudak E, Conturo TE. Arterial input functions from MR phase imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1996;36(6):809–15.
Bleeker EJ, van Buchem MA, Webb AG, van Osch MJ. Phase-based arterial input function measurements for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(2):358–68.
Garpebring A, Wirestam R, Yu J, Asklund T, Karlsson M. Phase-based arterial input functions in humans applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: potential usefulness and limitations. Magma. 2011;24(4):233–45.
Cron GO, Foottit C, Yankeelov TE, Avruch LI, Schweitzer ME, Cameron I. Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(2):498–504.
Korporaal JG, van den Berg CA, van Osch MJ, Groenendaal G, van Vulpen M, van der Heide UA. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(5):1267–74.
Simonis FF, Sbrizzi A, Beld E, Lagendijk JJ, van den Berg CA. Improving the arterial input function in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI by fitting the signal in the complex plane. Magn Reson Med. 2015.
Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet. 2003;361(9352):107–16.
Fayad ZA, Mani V, Woodward M, Kallend D, Bansilal S, Pozza J, et al. Rationale and design of dal-PLAQUE: a study assessing efficacy and safety of dalcetrapib on progression or regression of atherosclerosis using magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Am Heart J. 2011;162(2):214–21 e2.
Zhao XQ, Phan BA, Chu B, Bray F, Moore AB, Polissar NL, et al. Testing the hypothesis of atherosclerotic plaque lipid depletion during lipid therapy by magnetic resonance imaging: study design of Carotid Plaque Composition Study. Am Heart J. 2007;154(2):239–46.
Jain MK, Ridker PM. Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(12):977–87.
Ramalho J, Semelka RC, Ramalho M, Nunes RH, AlObaidy M, Castillo M. Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulation and toxicity: an update. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015.
de Rotte AA, Koning W, Truijman MT, den Hartog AG, Bovens SM, Vink A, et al. Seven-tesla magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaque in the significantly stenosed carotid artery: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol. 2014;49(11):749–57.
Koning W, de Rotte AA, Bluemink JJ, van der Velden TA, Luijten PR, Klomp DW, et al. MRI of the carotid artery at 7 Tesla: quantitative comparison with 3 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(3):773–80.
Hyafil F, Schindler A, Sepp D, Obenhuber T, Bayer-Karpinska A, Boeckh-Behrens T, et al. High-risk plaque features can be detected in non-stenotic carotid plaques of patients with ischaemic stroke classified as cryptogenic using combined F-FDG PET/MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015.
Rischpler C, Nekolla SG, Beer AJ. PET/MR imaging of atherosclerosis: initial experience and outlook. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3(5):393–6.
Ripa RS, Kjaer A. Imaging atherosclerosis with hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:914516.
Ripa RS, Knudsen A, Hag AM, Lebech AM, Loft A, Keller SH, et al. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3(4):361–71.
Bini J, Eldib M, Robson PM, Calcagno C, Fayad ZA. Simultaneous carotid PET/MR: feasibility and improvement of magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015.
Nguyen VL, Kooi ME, Backes WH, van Hoof RH, Saris AE, Wishaupt MC, et al. Suitability of pharmacokinetic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of abdominal aortic aneurysm vessel wall: a comparison. PLoS One. 2013;8(10), e75173.
Nguyen VL, Backes WH, Kooi ME, Wishaupt MCJ, Hellenthal FAMVI, Bosboom EMH, et al. Quantification of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall enhancement with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: feasibility, reproducibility, and initial experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(6):1449–56.
Acknowledgments
This research was performed within the framework of CTMM, the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (www.ctmm.nl), project PARISk (grant 01C-202), and supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation. M.E. Kooi is supported by Aspasia Grant 015.008.047 from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. J.E. Wildberger and M.E. Kooi are supported by Stichting de Weijerhorst. The authors would like to thank Estelle C. Nijssen for critically reviewing the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Raf H.M. van Hoof declares grant support from CTMM. Sylvia Heeneman declares no conflict of interest. Joachim E. Wildberger declares grant support from Siemens, Philips, Bayer, and AGFA, and declares personal fees from Siemens and Bayer. M. Eline Kooi declares grant support from CTMM, Stichting de Weijerhorst, NWO (Aspasia), and Servier.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
All studies by R.H.M. van Hoof, S. Heeneman, J.E. Wildberger, and M.E. Kooi involving animal and/or human subjects were performed after approval by the appropriate institutional review boards. Where required, written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Vascular Biology
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
van Hoof, R.H.M., Heeneman, S., Wildberger, J.E. et al. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature. Curr Atheroscler Rep 18, 33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0583-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-016-0583-4