Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by diverse serological autoantibodies. Anti-dsDNA antibodies are involved in multiple organ damage, especially the kidney, skin, and central nervous system. Anti-dsDNA antibodies play a pivotal role in SLE, and researchers have developed therapeutic strategies targeting these antibodies. Approaches to reduce anti-dsDNA antibodies via B cell targeted biologics against B cell surface antigens, B cell survival factors, or Bruton’s tyrosine kinase have effectively eliminated B cells. However, their non-specific depletion hampers normal immune system functioning and limits the therapeutic benefits. Thus, scientists have attempted anti-dsDNA antibodies or lupus-specific strategies, such as the immature dendritic cell vaccine and immunoadsorption. Recently, synthetic mimic peptides (hCDR1, pCONs, DWEYS, FISLE-412, and ALW) that directly block anti-dsDNA autoantibodies have attracted attention, which could ameliorate lupus, decrease the serological autoantibody titer, reduce the deposition of renal autoantibodies, and improve pathological performance. These potent small peptide molecules are well tolerated, non-toxic, and non-immunogenic, which have demonstrated a benign safety profile and are expected to be hopeful candidates for SLE management. In this review, we clarify the role of anti-dsDNA antibodies in SLE, mainly focus on the current strategies targeting anti-dsDNA antibodies, and discuss their potential clinical value.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease associated with severe organ damage involving both the innate and adaptive immune systems. Although the precious etiopathogenesis of SLE is not fully defined, growing evidence suggests that the clearance deficiency of apoptotic and necrotic cells and the degradation deficiency of NETosis (neutrophil extracellular traps) may play a vital role in SLE, especially in the early stages [1, 2]. That is, the autoantigens contain nuclear substances released from the dead cells mentioned above, which are exposed to antigen-presenting cells (APCs), e.g., follicular dendritic cells and macrophages. After processing by APC, autoantigens are presented to autoreactive T cells or B cells. In this process, diverse immunological pathways dysregulation, proinflammatory cytokine secretion, autoantibodies production, and complement system activation ultimately lead to the loss of autoimmune tolerance [3]. Dozens of multiple autoantibodies can be detected in the serum of SLE patients, including anti-dsDNA, anti-Smith, anti-ribonucleoprotein (RNP), anti-Ro, anti-La, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-nuclear (ANA), and anti-phospholipid [4]. Additionally, numerous autoantibodies are the hallmark of the SLE serologic profile.
These autoantibodies may be associated with certain clinical manifestations, especially the strong correlation between anti-dsDNA antibodies and lupus nephritis. Anti-dsDNA antibodies could directly bind to DNA antigens or cross-reactive antigens in renal cells and indirectly form anti-dsDNA antibody-containing immune complexes (ICs) in the renal parenchyma. This triggers the complement cascade, accompanied by an infiltration of immune cells and cytokine release, which can induce kidney inflammatory and fibrotic processes [5]. Anti-dsDNA IgG can penetrate living cell by binding to nuclear components to internalize autoantibodies, which can induce mesangial cell proliferation and increase the secretion of proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 [6, 7]. Although the exact penetration mechanism of anti-dsDNA IgG is still unclear, its unique penetration nature may augment it to a more prominent pathogenetic effect in SLE.
Based on the important role anti-dsDNA antibodies play in SLE pathogenesis, approaches to reduce pathogenicity by decreasing or blocking these antibodies may effectively alleviate disease. Current traditional therapies, however, are mainly based on the application of non-specific immunosuppressive drugs, including cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids, which have extensive clinical use but may have unavoidable serious adverse effects. Based on our improved understanding of the pathogenesis of anti-dsDNA antibodies, attempts have been made to develop promising biologically targeted therapies, like B cell targeted biologics and mimic peptides. In this review, we focus on existing SLE treatment strategies targeting the different pathogenic aspects of anti-dsDNA antibodies, including reducing production and blocking the binding of anti-dsDNA antibodies to antigens (Table 1).
The Origin of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies
Nuclear substances originate from billions of dead cells daily due to senescence, infections, or mechanical injuries. Normally, the immune system is not accessible to nuclear antigens because dead cells are quickly cleared to achieve self-stability, avoiding the accumulation of nuclear antigens. In addition, dysregulation of various cell death processes (e.g., apoptosis, necrosis, NETosis, and autophagy) accounts for the exposure of nuclear autoantigens [8]. Dysregulation of dead cells and clearance deficiency have been suggested in SLE patients [1]. Anti-dsDNA antibodies can recognize released dsDNA and compose ICs. Circulating ICs containing nucleic acids stimulate immature dendritic cell (iDC) activation by FcγRs. The activated DCs migrate to the lymphatic tissue where iDCs mature through overexpression of costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, and PD-L1), redistribution of MHC class II molecules, and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, and IL‐10), which promote activation of B cells and T cells [5, 9]. The differentially expressed FcγRs DCs may also promote the immune response to autoantigens in SLE [10]. Simultaneously, the DNA‐containing antigens can also directly activate autoreactive B cells by both B cell receptors (BCR) and Toll-like receptors (TLRs). In SLE patients, TLRs, especially TLR7 and TLR9, are crucial in the loss of B cell tolerance. They recognize BCR-mediated internalized self-nucleic acids, such as unmethylated CpG motifs in DNA (CpG-DNA) and RNA-associated antigens [11]. The intrinsic TLR7 signaling pathway participates in B cell differentiation via activating autoreactive B cells and promoting the proliferation and differentiation into antibody-producing plasma cells [11, 12]. Dysregulation of innate immunity, particularly over secretion of IFN-α, plays a vital role in somatic mutation and the class switch of anti-dsDNA antibodies in SLE [13]. Thus, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, as efficient producers of IFN-α, are critical in SLE.
Moreover, the autophagy mechanism is associated with SLE pathogenesis. The LC3-associated phagocytosis and beclin-1 autophagy pathways regulate the production of IFN-α [14, 15]. The discrepancy of the anti-dsDNA antibody subclass (IgM, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3) has a remarkably different affinity and pathogenicity in SLE [16]. Particular subclasses of anti-DNA antibodies, such as IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3, are more closely associated with a kidney’s pathogenic potential and active nephritis [16]. This magnifies the immune response and mediates SLE pathogenesis.
The Anti-DNA Antibody-Targeting Organs
The anti-dsDNA autoantibody is the hallmark of lupus nephritis. Nearly 80% of lupus nephritis patients have this seropositive trait. Moreover, the effect of anti-dsDNA antibodies on renal resident cells in the lupus nephritis process is clear. Apart from reacting with diverse DNA substances, anti-dsDNA antibodies can bind to variant non-DNA antigens, such as annexin II, α-actinin, laminin, collagen III, collagen IV, entactin, complement receptor type 1 (C1q), N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), ribosomal P proteins, heparan sulfate, and others [5]. Additionally, SLE patients have anti-dsDNA IgG capable of penetrating cells by binding to cell surface antigens, thus internalizing the autoantibody into the cytoplasm and nucleus [6]. This augments anti-dsDNA IgG to a more prominent pathogenetic role in lupus nephritis.
Anti-dsDNA antibodies contribute to inflammatory and fibrosis processes by overexpressing a wealth of proinflammatory cytokines, such as monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, hyaluronan, and lipocalin-2. This has been demonstrated in both human and murine mesangial cells and in human proximal tubular epithelial cells (PTECs). This results in a chronic profile of kidney damage [5]. The accumulation of inflammatory cytokines mediated by the anti-dsDNA antibody can also trigger infiltration of immune cells and enhance endoplasmic-reticulum stress in mesangial cells [17].
Multiple signaling pathways are also associated with the development and progression of lupus nephritis. Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) acts through its receptor fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) to induce downstream inflammatory and fibrotic responses in kidney cells. This includes the expression of MCP-1 and interferon γ-induced protein 10 (IP-10) [18,19,20]. Inhibition of TWEAK relieves inflammation and protects the filtration barrier by decreasing renal IgG deposition without influencing serum anti-DNA IgG levels [21]. Fibrosis progression is a common manifestation in chronic lupus nephritis, in which the irreversible injury is induced by TWEAK/Fn14 [5]. This process can lead to lupus nephritis proliferation, apoptosis, or fibrosis via different mechanisms.
Although anti-dsDNA antibodies alone are inadequate to cause nephritis, studies show that severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice only manifested proteinuria without pathologic changes to kidney histology after an injection of human anti-DNA IgG antibodies. This confirms that lupus nephritis initiation is not due to a single factor [22]. Nonetheless, a large amount of research suggests that anti-dsDNA antibodies accelerate lupus nephritis processes, and lupus nephritis symptoms are improved by blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies [23, 24]. We conclude that anti-dsDNA antibodies are involved in renal inflammation and fibrosis; however, further investigation is needed on the complex mechanism of the cytokine networks and signaling pathways.
In addition to the kidneys, the central nervous system can be affected by SLE, and neuropsychiatric manifestations are related to a poor prognosis in SLE patients. Neuropsychiatric complications occur in the majority of patients with SLE and may present frequently during SLE onset [25]. Anti-phospholipid, anti-NMDAR, anti-microtubule-associated protein 2, anti-ribosomal P protein, anti-aquaporin 4, anti-endothelial cell, and anti-suprabasin autoantibodies account for central nervous system disease progression [26]. Anti-dsDNA antibodies bind to cross-reactive antigens, NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDAR, which leads to neuronal cell excitotoxicity and death by increasing the neuronal calcium influx [27]. Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) might enable anti-dsDNA/anti-NMDAR antibodies in the serum of patients with SLE to access to the central nervous system, contributing to neuronal death and cognitive dysfunction [28]. Although an increased serum level of anti-dsDNA/anti-NMDAR antibodies is not always correlated with neurological dysfunctions or neuropsychiatric activity, a higher titer of anti-dsDNA/anti-NMDAR antibodies is observed in SLE patients with active diffuse neuropsychiatric complications compared to patients with focal neuropsychiatric or non-inflammatory central nervous system disease [26]. In addition to the difference between specific neuropsychiatric disease conditions, this inconsistency may be due to sample discrepancies and the different cognitive evaluation methods applied in various studies.
Skin involvement is the most common manifestation of SLE, which has a broad spectrum of lesions. Serum anti-dsDNA antibody positivity is observed even in subtypes of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). It is known that anti-DNA antibodies can specifically bind to the dermal-epidermal junction of the skin and keratinocytes, leading to keratinocyte apoptosis by antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) [5]. Anti-DNA IgG in combination with inflammatory reactivity promotes binding to cross-reactive antigens, including collagen III and collagen IV in keratinocytes. The suppression of cytokine signaling (SOCS)-1 and 8 are associated with autoantibody accumulation in the skin [29, 30]. Moreover, activation of the TWEAK/Fn14 signal is prominent in the lesions of CLE patients and murine lupus models [31, 32]. UVB irradiation significantly exaggerates both the binding of anti-DNA IgG to and the expression of Fn14 on keratinocytes, which can interact with TWEAK to upregulate the secretion of proinflammatory factors and promote apoptosis [29, 31]. These upregulated factors, including RANTES (regulated upon activation and normal T cell expression, and secretion), IL-6, IL-8, IP-10, and MCP-1, subsequently amplify the inflammatory reaction by T cells and macrophage infiltration [31, 32]. Anti-DNA IgG is closely associated with CLE, but further studies concerning the specific mechanism are needed. The pathogenic mechanism of anti-dsDNA antibodies in neuropsychiatric lupus, lupus nephritis, and CLE is showed in Fig. 1.
The Reduction of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies
Immunosuppressive and Immunomodulatory Therapies
Conventional SLE therapies are based on the use of corticosteroids, which have both anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects. In particular, corticosteroids are effective for active lupus nephritis and other lupus-related manifestations. However, their transient curative effect and undesirable adverse side effects limit their usage [33]. Other cytotoxic immunosuppressive agents, such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, tacrolimus, or mycophenolate mofetil single, or a combination with corticosteroids, are utilized extensively in patients with various manifestations of SLE for long-term disease control and to minimize steroid requirements. These agents also have significant limitations and serious adverse events, including cytopenia, infections, and possible malignancy [34].
Hydroxychloroquine, as an immunomodulator, can modulate the immune response without increasing the risk of infection or malignancy. Hydroxychloroquine alone or in combination with steroids and immunosuppressive drugs has been widely used in SLE management to improve patients’ long-term survival by controlling lupus flares and accrual of organ damage. According to the 2019 updated European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) guidelines for the SLE management, hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all lupus patients unless contraindicated (level of evidence 1b, grade of recommendation A) [35]. Hydroxychloroquine exerts immunomodulatory effect by inhibiting BCR and TLR signaling and the secretion of cytokines to prevent B cell survival and autoantibody production [36,37,38]. It can also prevent MHC class II-mediated auto-nuclear antigen presentation by inhibiting lysosomal activity [39, 40]. Moreover, hydroxychloroquine exerts an anti-IFN-α effect by interfering with nucleic acid sensor cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS) to inhibit stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway [40, 41]. A prospective cohort study has revealed that hydroxychloroquine can ameliorate classical SLE manifestations, such as skin problems and joint pain by anti-inflammation and decreasing autoantibodies level [42].
Immunoadsorption Therapies
It is well recognized that SLE has a predominant association with aberrant humoral immunity rather than cellular immunity, which provides the rationale for the application of extracorporeal treatment, such as plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, to remove pathogenic components such as autoantibodies, ICs, and cytokines from the patients’ blood. Extracorporeal therapy has been used for SLE management since the 1970s. Traditional plasma exchange technologies are related to a wider range of component removal compared to immunoadsorption and their use is limited due to nonselective removal patterns and restricted clinical efficacy. The current optimization technique, immunoadsorption plasmapheresis, has a higher selective removal that provides an alternative SLE treatment approach. A variety of pioneering materials for SLE treatment have been developed, including immobilized protein A, phenylalanine ligand, DNA-collodion-charcoal membranes, DNA-immobilized adsorbents, DNA-immobilized nanocellulose-based immune adsorbent, and dextran sulfate ligand, which can clear anti-dsDNA antibodies effectively [43, 44]. Despite the possible side effects of plasma product replacement and catheter-related complications, such as bleeding or catheter-related infection, immunoadsorption still seems to be a safe and beneficial technique in refractory SLE patients, especially in pregnant or lactating patients [44, 45].
B Cell-Targeting Therapies
B cells play an indispensable role in SLE, not only by generating multiple autoantibodies including anti-dsDNA and being a rich source of cytokines, but also by T cell activation and APC functioning. Based on this fact, therapeutic strategies targeting B cells and reducing their activity are prominent candidates for decreasing anti-dsDNA antibodies and treating SLE.
B Cell Surface Antigens
B cells arise from the bone marrow and undergo several stages of maturation until they develop into plasma cells. During maturation, B cells express various cell surface antigens which are useful markers and potential therapy targets [46]. CD20, CD22, and CD19 are B cell surface antigens expressed on immature and mature B cells that are absent from terminally differentiated plasma cells. Upon binding to their target, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting these B cell surface antigens can lead to B cell apoptosis and depletion, thus decreasing autoantibodies levels.
Rituximab, a chimeric (mouse-human) mAb against CD20, has demonstrated a significant effect on rheumatoid arthritis and B cell malignancies, but its therapeutic effects on SLE remain controversial [47,48,49]. The effectiveness of rituximab in the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and severe non-renal SLE manifestations (including severe joint, hematological, cutaneous, and neuropsychiatric disease) has been demonstrated in many observational studies and routine clinical uses [50,51,52,53].
However, two large, phase III, randomized placebo-controlled trials of rituximab in extra-renal lupus (EXPLORER study, NCT00137969) and renal lupus (LUNAR study, NCT00282347) failed to meet their primary endpoints [54, 55]. LUNAR study, including 144 patients with class III or class IV lupus nephritis, is the largest randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the effect of rituximab to initial therapy for proliferative lupus nephritis [55]. LUNAR revealed that the overall (complete and partial) renal response rates were 45.8% among the 72 patients receiving placebo and 56.9% among the 72 patients receiving rituximab; but this study did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the responses of patients treated with rituximab and those of patients treated with placebo after 1 year of treatment [55]. In contrast to the effect of rituximab in terms of the clinical endpoints, rituximab significantly improved anti-dsDNA antibody and serum complement C3/C4 levels in LUNAR study [55].
These contradictory results of rituximab are somewhat unexpected; factors surrounding clinical trial design and size, background medications, and the complexity and heterogeneity of SLE make it difficult to determine its true efficacy and may explain the discrepancies in different trials [49]. Nevertheless, based on the fact that sufficient clinical data demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of rituximab in difficult-to-treat lupus patients, both the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the EULAR recommend rituximab as an appropriate option for refractory SLE patients with lupus nephritis or hematological damage, especially after conventional therapy has failed [56,57,58,59].
Two fully humanized anti-CD20 mAbs have also been studied in SLE to avoid high rate of allergy-like responses to rituximab in patients with SLE [49]. Ocrelizumab is a recombinant humanized mAb that selectively targets and depletes CD20 + B cells in the peripheral circulation and has been studied in two clinical trials in SLE [49, 60]. A phase III trial in non-renal SLE (BEGIN study) was terminated early when the sponsor decided not to pursue this indication [49]. Another randomized, double-blind, phase III trial (BELONG study, NCT00626197) evaluates ocrelizumab in SLE patients with lupus nephritis who were receiving ocrelizumab and either cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil [61]. The 32-week data revealed renal response rates of 63% and 51% in the ocrelizumab and placebo groups respectively, and an apparent benefit in patients receiving the background cyclophosphamide [61]. However, due to a high rate of serious infection in patients receiving background mycophenolate mofetil, BELONG study terminated early [61]. Obinutuzumab, another fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, is more efficient than rituximab at inducing B cell cytotoxicity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or SLE, and has just completed its phase II trial (NCT02550652) [62].
Obexelimab (XmAb5871), a novel humanized anti-CD19 mAb, has been evaluated the ability to maintain disease activity in 105 patients with moderate-to-severe SLE (without organ threatening) in a phase II trial (NCT02725515). An assessment of the data from this trial revealed that patients treated with obexelimab have a better control of disease activity level compared to patients treated with placebo [49]. An anti-CD22 mAb called epratuzumab modulates B cell signaling without substantial reductions in the number of B cells. Two large, phase III, randomized placebo-controlled trials in patients with moderate-to-severe active SLE (EMBODY 1, NCT01262365 and EMBODY 2 study, NCT01261793) revealed that treatment with epratuzumab did not result in improvements in the rate of positive response over that observed in the placebo group [63]. It is not clear why trials have failed to demonstrate efficacy of epratuzumab, but further evaluation of patient subsets, biomarkers, and exploratory outcome models may improve the design of future SLE clinical trials and test the true level of effectiveness.
BAFF/APRIL
There are two B-lineage cell survival factors, B cell activating factor (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL). They involved in B cell maturation, activation, and survival and have received the bulk of attention in SLE therapy [64]. BAFF, also known as B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), is a 285-amino acid transmembrane protein member of the tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily [65]. The soluble form BAFF can bind to three receptors on the surface of B cells: B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), transmembrane activator and cyclophilin interactor (TACI), and BAFF receptor 3 (BR3) [65]. BAFF leads to a greater dependency of autoreactive B cells than of normal non-autoreactive B cells [66]. Genetic depletion or BAFF antagonist treatment reduces B cells and prevents progression of SLE in MRL/lpr or BWF1 mice [67]. In addition, high sera BAFF levels are common in SLE and closely associated with higher disease activity or autoantibody levels in SLE patients [68]. Moreover, patients with BAFF overexpression have a greater tendency towards organ damage over time compared to patients with lower BAFF expression levels [69]. APRIL, another B-lineage cell survival factor, is a 250-amino acid with similar biological properties to BAFF that binds to TACI and BCMA, but not to BR3 [70]. While BAFF plays a profound role in SLE, the cogent evidence in lupus-prone murine and SLE patients shows this is not the case with APRIL. Although APRIL is an essential survival factor with substantial homology to BAFF, neither APRIL-transgenic or APRIL-deficient NZM mice demonstrated an appreciated effect on B cell numbers and clinical autoimmune features [71]. Combination treatment of BAFF and APRIL antagonists is not more effective compared to BAFF antagonist treatment alone in NZM mice [72, 73]. Based on the comprehensive data, APRIL may not be as vital as BAFF in SLE.
Therapies were developed based on BAFF’s general properties. Belimumab, a fully humanized recombinant IgG1 mAb, binds and antagonizes to soluble BAFF, blocking its interaction with BCMA, TACI, and BR3, therefore inhibiting BAFF activity [64]. Two large placebo-controlled phase III trials, BLISS-52 and BLISS-76, studied the efficacy in patients with mild-to-moderate SLE (without severe active lupus nephritis and central nervous system manifestation) and demonstrated a significant amelioration of disease activity with 10 mg/kg of intravenous belimumab as compared with placebo. Moreover, belimumab also met key secondary endpoints, particularly reducing the time to severe flares, corticosteroid-sparing effect, fatigue levels, and improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [69, 74]. Belimumab, based on its significant clinical response and safety in several trails, was FDA-approved for SLE in March of 2011 [75]. Additionally, a recent retrospective study also showed that patients with active SLE and low baseline damage can benefit from belimumab early in the disease [76].
In a randomized, controlled trial (BLISS-LN) including 448 adult patients with active lupus nephritis, belimumab plus standard therapy compared to standard therapy (mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide-azathioprine) alone had a higher primary efficacy renal response [77]. However, the beneficial effect in patients with severe active central nervous system disease and the potential side effects, such as the rate of infections originated from B cell depletion, still require additional confirmation in further trials [69]. The combination treatment studies of B cell depletion with rituximab and B cell survival inhibition with belimumab demonstrated a better clinical effect [75]. However, given the conflicting evidence, the usefulness of combination therapy must be examined in the future.
Four other BAFF targeting biological agents are in development. Blisibimod, a Fc fusion protein of BAFF binding domains, binds to both soluble and membrane-bound BAFF [78]. Tabalumab is a human IgG4 mAb that binds to both forms of BAFF and is provided subcutaneously [79]. Atacicept, a fully humanized soluble fusion protein containing the Fc portion of IgG and the TACI receptor, binds to both forms of BAFF and APRIL [80]. The fourth BAFF antagonist, telitacicept (RC18), a recombinant fusion protein of the human IgG1 Fc domain and TACI receptor extracellular domain that binds to BAFF, is in the phase II trial recruitment phase in the treatment of IgA nephropathy (NCT04905212).
BTK
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a tyrosine-protein kinase expressed in B cells and myeloid cells. Functionally, BTK is an essential molecule involved in both innate and adaptive immunity. It regulates many signal transduction pathways, such as the B cell receptor and Fcγ receptor signal [81]. As a critical molecule for regulating B cell differentiation and activation, genetic defects of BTK contribute to X-linked agammaglobulinemia, a severe disorder involving the absence of mature B cells and immunoglobulins in human [81]. In multiple preclinical studies of murine lupus, several distinct BTK inhibitors (including ibrutinib, which has been widely used in the treatment of several B cell malignancies, and fenebrutinib/GDC-0853) reduced splenic germinal center B cells, plasma cells, and various autoantibodies levels, including anti-dsDNA autoantibodies [49, 82]. Correspondingly, the overexpression of BTK led to an increased number of B cells and anti-nuclear autoantibodies, manifested as a series of SLE-like damage [83]. Whether BTK inhibitors can improve SLE manifestation in humans must be confirmed, but they are still a promising strategy.
iDC Vaccine
The deficiency of immune tolerance is key in SLE pathogenesis. Therefore, iDCs that induce the clonal anergy of T cells have been highlighted. DCs are highly specialized APCs which present MHC-antigen complex as the first active signal and provide costimulatory factors as the second signal to T cells for clone activity [84]. Whether iDCs can induce apoptosis of T cells and differentiate T regulatory cells (Treg) depends on the levels of MHC molecules, CD80, and CD86 [85]. In short, the immune response induced by DCs depends on the mature state. Based on its immunomodulatory properties, a strategy has been developed for SLE by iDCs loaded with specific antigen-including dsDNA as a live cell vaccine [86]. In a preclinical study, DNA antigen-pulsed iDC vaccine demonstrated a protective effect on renal damage by significantly decreasing proteinuria, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine (SCr), and renal antibody deposition. However, the exact mechanism of iDC vaccine interacting with immunity is unclear; iDC vaccine still requires further investigation.
Blockade of Anti-dsDNA Antibodies
Based on the pathogenic mechanism of anti-dsDNA antibodies and the risk of infection using B cell depleting agents, therapeutic small-molecule mimics of peptides that target anti-dsDNA antibodies and block their interaction with antigens or tissues are getting attention. Synthetic peptides are selected based on the specific sequences of pathogenic antibody. The desired amino acid residues can be selected to ensure a higher affinity and lower immunogenicity [5]. Below, we discuss mimic peptides that block the binding of anti-dsDNA antibodies and inhibit SLE-associated autoimmune reactions (Table 2).
hCDR1
hCDR1 (GYYWSWIRQPPGKGEEWIG) is a 19-mer peptide that is based on the heavy chain complementarity-determining region 1 (CDR1) sequences from human monoclonal anti-DNA antibody [87]. The potential mechanism of its therapeutic effect has been well documented. hCDR1 exerts protective effects by regulating various cytokines and molecules, including downregulating proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, and TNF-α and upregulating immunosuppressive cytokine transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). LFA-1 and CD44, expressed on APC for T cell interactions, are also downregulated [75]. hCDR1 induces peripheral tolerance, which is involved with various immune cells, including regulating Tregs and inducing DC with an immature or tolerogenic phenotype [75, 88]. c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) which is part of the p21Ras/MAP kinase pathway is highly expressed in the T cells of lupus mice [89]. hCDR1 can significantly decrease the rate of T cell apoptosis by affecting JNK [89]. hCDR1 can also upregulate the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-xL and diminish caspase-3 to prevent T cell apoptosis [89]. hCDR1 can reduce anti-dsDNA antibodies by affecting B cell survival and autoreactivity through BAFF inhibition [90]. However, it acts in a more modest way than BAFF inhibitors [90]. A recent study shows that hCDR1 can downregulate the expression of the indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) gene, which increases activity in SLE patients [91].
Various murine lupus models reveal that weekly subcutaneous administration of hCDR1 at a small dose (25-100 ug) ameliorates lupus manifestations, including reducing serological autoantibodies and relieving renal damage [92, 93]. Meanwhile, treatment with hCDR1 can not only improve brain pathology but also ameliorate cognitive function and mood-related behaviors in lupus-prone mice [94]. In a randomized, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial, the involved 340 SLE patients (mainly with musculoskeletal, hematological, skin, or mucous membrane manifestations and without active lupus nephritis or central nervous system manifestations) are given a subcutaneous administration of hCDR1/Edratide at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg or placebo once a week [95]. Although the primary endpoints of the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI-2 K) were not met, this trial showed that hCDR1/Edratide is safe and well tolerated, and exerts remarkable beneficial effects by secondary British Isles Lupus Assessment Group index (BILAG) score [95]. Therefore, further studies using an appropriate endpoint in SLE patients should be carried out and the effect of hCDR1 in more severe types of SLE needs to be clarified.
pConsensus
pConsensus (pCons, FIEWNKLRFRQGLEW) is a 15-amino acid peptide that is derived from the heavy chain variable region of murine anti-dsDNA antibody [96]. pCons, acting as a tolerogen in vivo, can delay the onset of nephritis and prolong survival time significantly in lupus-prone mice (NZB/NZW). This effect was associated with the decreased production of autoantibodies and regulation of T cell autoreactivity, such as induction of CD4+CD25+ Tregs and inhibitory CD8+ T cells [96, 97]. While incubated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in SLE patients, pCons can expand CD4+CD25+ Tregs and suppress proliferation and secretion of inflammatory cytokines [98]. Moreover, the oral dosage form is not expected to induce immunogenicity [99]. Oral administration with modified pCons consisting of D-amino acids can ameliorate proteinuria and serum anti-dsDNA antibodies in lupus-prone mice in a safe and effective manner [99].
DWEYS
The DWEYS (or consensus sequence D/E W D/E Y S/G) peptide, selected by the phage library with mouse monoclonal anti-dsDNA R4A mAb, inhibits R4A mAb from binding to dsDNA. Moreover, DWEYS is also part of the NMDAR expressed on neurons, which has demonstrated that anti-DWEYS and anti-dsDNA antibodies have cross-reactivity with NMDAR [100]. Intravenous administration of the DWEYS peptide to gestating mice demonstrates a protective effect on fetal brains when exposed to toxic doses of anti-NMDAR antibodies [101]. Ex vivo human lupus studies indicate that the therapeutic potential of the DWEYS peptide comes from inhibiting DNA binding [101]. DWEYS peptide can reduce anti-dsDNA antibody titers and ameliorate nephritis in lupus-prone mice by suppressing autoreactive B cells [102]. The DWEYS peptide appears to be harmless when administered intravenously, which is likely due to its non-immunogenicity [102]. However, its unstable construction means that it cannot be administered orally and the short half-life compromises its potential effect.
FISLE-412
FISLE-412, a molecular topology of the DWEYS structure, has similar mimic-neutralizing activities as the DWEYS peptide. FISLE-412 demonstrated its effectiveness in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo [103, 104]. It can block DNA recognition of anti-dsDNA antibodies, reduce glomerular antibody deposition, and ameliorate neurotoxicity by inhibiting the neuronal apoptosis induced by R4A mAb in the mouse hippocampus with a noticeably superior effect compared to DWEYS [104]. The analogues of FISLE-412 have also been identified to neutralize anti-dsDNA antibodies more efficiently by establishing a mimic epitope library around FISLE-412 [105]. The peptides’ small molecular property has advantages in high-throughput and standardized synthesis technology. A practical, simplified synthetic method has been attempted to achieve rapid and cheap synthesis [106]. FISLE-412 was well tolerated and had no toxicity nor immunogenicity [105]. Its stable structure also makes FISLE-412 suitable for oral delivery, which is another advantage over DWEYS.
ALW
ALW (ALWPPNLHAWVP), a 12-mer peptide mimic, was selected from the four types of murine monoclonal anti-DNA IgG isotypes (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3) by screening the phage display libraries [24]. ALW peptide can bind to all four IgG isotypes with different affinity and prevent IgG isotypes from binding to antigens of dsDNA and laminin. This molecule can also prevent IgG isotypes or anti-dsDNA antibodies in SLE patients’ serum interacting with glomerulus and glomerular mesangial cells [24]. ALW peptides can inhibit glomerular deposition of antibodies, reduce serum anti-dsDNA antibody titers, improve renal pathological manifestations, or suppress proliferation, fibrosis, and inflammatory cell infiltration of renal tissue, providing a protective effect on lupus nephritis manifestation in MRL/lpr mice [23].
Furthermore, alanine substitutions at the third or eighth position decrease binding to anti-dsDNA antibodies [24]. Due to the absence of certain amino acid residues, such as methionine, cysteine, and glutamine, ALW was physiologically stable and resistant to oxidation, cyclization, and degradation. The ALW peptide is non-toxic and non-immunogenic, and has high solubility in water, which makes it safe and convenient to intravenous administration [24]. However, the ALW half-life is only 0.32 h, and the short half-life compromises its efficacy [24]. In future, chemical modifications or nanotechnological delivery carriers may provide a good idea to improve its stability and half-time.
Conclusions
Anti-dsDNA antibody, the hallmark of SLE, contributes to kidney, brain, and skin damage in SLE. The pathogenicity of autoantibodies had been used to develop a means of attempts to reduce anti-dsDNA antibodies, including immunosuppression, immunoadsorption, B cell-targeting, and iDC vaccine therapies. However, immunosuppression and B cell-targeting therapies are not distinctive for lupus and may hamper normal immune system functioning, which bring unavoidable adverse effects. Notably, the mimic peptides designed by blocking anti-dsDNA antibodies highlight the promising therapeutic potential to ameliorate the manifestation of SLE. The peptides’ small molecular property demonstrates advances in high-throughput and standardized and modified synthesis technology. However, most of the peptides are now at the preclinical stage and have a short half-life and unsatisfactory physiological stability. Further studies are warranted to develop more effective therapies for SLE.
Availability of Data and Material
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- SLE:
-
Systemic lupus erythematosus
- APC:
-
Antigen-presenting cell
- IC:
-
Immune complex
- iDC:
-
Immature dendritic cell
- TLR:
-
Toll-like receptor
- NMDAR:
-
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor
- MCP-1:
-
Monocyte chemotactic protein 1
- TWEAK:
-
Tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis
- Fn14:
-
Fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14
- IP-10:
-
Interferon γ-induced protein 10
- CLE:
-
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
- mAb:
-
Monoclonal antibody
- BAFF:
-
B cell activating factor
- APRIL:
-
A proliferation-inducing ligand
- BLyS:
-
B lymphocyte stimulator
- BCMA:
-
B cell maturation antigen
- TACI:
-
Transmembrane activator and cyclophilin interactor
- BR3:
-
BAFF receptor 3
- BTK:
-
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
- Treg:
-
T regulatory cell
- CDR1:
-
Complementarity-determining region 1
References
Mahajan A, Herrmann M, Munoz LE (2016) Clearance deficiency and cell death pathways: a model for the pathogenesis of SLE. Front Immunol 7:35. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00035
Boeltz S, Hagen M, Knopf J et al (2019) Towards a pro-resolving concept in systemic lupus erythematosus. Semin Immunopathol 41:681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00281-019-00760-5
Bai Y, Tong Y, Liu Y, Hu H (2018) Self-dsDNA in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Immunol 191:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.13041
Xiao ZX, Miller JS, Zheng SG (2021) An updated advance of autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun Rev 20:102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102743
Wang X, Xia Y (2019) Anti-double stranded DNA antibodies: origin, pathogenicity, and targeted therapies. Front Immunol 10:1667. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01667
Zannikou M, Bellou S, Eliades P et al (2016) DNA-histone complexes as ligands amplify cell penetration and nuclear targeting of anti-DNA antibodies via energy-independent mechanisms. Immunology 147:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12542
Tangtanatakul P, Thammasate B, Jacquet A et al (2017) Transcriptomic profiling in human mesangial cells using patient-derived lupus autoantibodies identified miR-10a as a potential regulator of IL8. Sci Rep 7:14517. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15160-8
Mistry P, Kaplan MJ (2017) Cell death in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin Immunol 185:59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2016.08.010
Mackern-Oberti JP, Llanos C, Riedel CA, Bueno SM, Kalergis AM (2015) Contribution of dendritic cells to the autoimmune pathology of systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunology 146:497–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12504
Clatworthy MR, Aronin CEP, Mathews RJ, Morgan NY, Smith KGC, Germain RN (2014) Immune complexes stimulate CCR7-dependent dendritic cell migration to lymph nodes. Nat Med 20:1458–1463. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3709
Fillatreau S, Manfroi B, Dörner T (2021) Toll-like receptor signalling in B cells during systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Rheumatol 17:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-00544-4
Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Zumaquero E et al (2018) Distinct effector B cells induced by unregulated Toll-like receptor 7 contribute to pathogenic responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity 49:725-739.e726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015
Trotter K, Clark MR, Liarski VM (2016) Overview of pathophysiology and treatment of human lupus nephritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 28:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000319
Henault J, Martinez J, Riggs JM et al (2012) Noncanonical autophagy is required for type I interferon secretion in response to DNA-immune complexes. Immunity 37:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.014
Liang Q, Seo GJ, Choi YJ et al (2014) Crosstalk between the cGAS DNA sensor and Beclin-1 autophagy protein shapes innate antimicrobial immune responses. Cell Host Microbe 15:228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.009
Xia Y, Pawar RD, Nakouzi AS et al (2012) The constant region contributes to the antigenic specificity and renal pathogenicity of murine anti-DNA antibodies. J Autoimmun 39:398–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2012.06.005
Zhang H, Zhao C, Wang S et al (2015) Anti-dsDNA antibodies induce inflammation via endoplasmic reticulum stress in human mesangial cells. J Transl Med 13:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0536-7
Lu J, Kwan BC, Lai FM et al (2011) Gene expression of TWEAK/Fn14 and IP-10/CXCR3 in glomerulus and tubulointerstitium of patients with lupus nephritis. Nephrology (Carlton) 16:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01449.x
Gao HX, Campbell SR, Burkly LC et al (2009) TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) induces inflammatory and proliferative effects in human kidney cells. Cytokine 46:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2008.12.001
Zhang Y, Zeng W, Xia Y (2021) TWEAK/Fn14 axis is an important player in fibrosis. J Cell Physiol 236:3304–3316. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.30089
Xia Y, Campbell SR, Broder A et al (2012) Inhibition of the TWEAK/Fn14 pathway attenuates renal disease in nephrotoxic serum nephritis. Clin Immunol 145:108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2012.08.008
Ehrenstein MR, Katz DR, Griffiths MH et al (1995) Human IgG anti-DNA antibodies deposit in kidneys and induce proteinuria in SCID mice. Kidney Int 48:705–711. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1995.341
Wang H, Lu M, Zhai S et al (2019) ALW peptide ameliorates lupus nephritis in MRL/lpr mice. Arthritis Res Ther 21:261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-019-2038-0
Xia Y, Eryilmaz E, Der E et al (2016) A peptide mimic blocks the cross-reaction of anti-DNA antibodies with glomerular antigens. Clin Exp Immunol 183:369–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12734
Govoni M, Hanly JG (2020) The management of neuropsychiatric lupus in the 21st century: still so many unmet needs? Rheumatology (Oxford) 59:v52–v62. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa404
Schwartz N, Stock AD, Putterman C (2019) Neuropsychiatric lupus: new mechanistic insights and future treatment directions. Nat Rev Rheumatol 15:137–152. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0156-8
Faust TW, Chang EH, Kowal C et al (2010) Neurotoxic lupus autoantibodies alter brain function through two distinct mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:18569–18574. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006980107
Kowal C, Degiorgio LA, Lee JY et al (2006) Human lupus autoantibodies against NMDA receptors mediate cognitive impairment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19854–19859. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608397104
Dong Y, Zhang Y, Xia L et al (2017) The deposition of anti-DNA IgG contributes to the development of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Immunol Lett 191:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2017.09.003
Liu L, Xu G, Dou H, Deng GM (2016) The features of skin inflammation induced by lupus serum. Clin Immunol 165:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2016.02.007
Liu Y, Xu M, Min X et al (2017) TWEAK/Fn14 activation participates in Ro52-mediated photosensitization in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Front Immunol 8:651. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00651
Doerner JL, Wen J, Xia Y et al (2015) TWEAK/Fn14 signaling involvement in the pathogenesis of cutaneous disease in the MRL/lpr model of spontaneous lupus. J Invest Dermatol 135:1986–1995. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.124
Ruiz-Irastorza G, Bertsias G (2020) Treating systemic lupus erythematosus in the 21st century: new drugs and new perspectives on old drugs. Rheumatology (Oxford) 59:v69–v81. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keaa403
Broen JCA, van Laar JM (2020) Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and tacrolimus: mechanisms in rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 16:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0374-8
Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alunno A et al (2019) 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 78:736–745. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215089
Hjorton K, Hagberg N, Israelsson E et al (2018) Cytokine production by activated plasmacytoid dendritic cells and natural killer cells is suppressed by an IRAK4 inhibitor. Arthritis Res Ther 20:238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-018-1702-0
Wozniacka A, Lesiak A, Narbutt J, McCauliffe DP, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A (2006) Chloroquine treatment influences proinflammatory cytokine levels in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Lupus 15:268–275. https://doi.org/10.1191/0961203306lu2299oa
Fava A, Petri M (2019) Systemic lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and clinical management. J Autoimmun 96:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2018.11.001
Mauthe M, Orhon I, Rocchi C et al (2018) Chloroquine inhibits autophagic flux by decreasing autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Autophagy 14:1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15548627.2018.1474314
Schrezenmeier E, Dörner T (2020) Mechanisms of action of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine: implications for rheumatology. Nat Rev Rheumatol 16:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-020-0372-x
An J, Woodward JJ, Sasaki T, Minie M, Elkon KB (2015) Cutting edge: antimalarial drugs inhibit IFN-β production through blockade of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-DNA interaction. J Immunol 194:4089–4093. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1402793
Monzavi SM, Alirezaei A, Shariati-Sarabi Z et al (2018) Efficacy analysis of hydroxychloroquine therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a study on disease activity and immunological biomarkers. Inflammopharmacology 26:1175–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10787-018-0512-y
Yamaji K (2017) Immunoadsorption for collagen and rheumatic diseases. Transfus Apher Sci 56:666–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transci.2017.08.012
Kronbichler A, Brezina B, Quintana LF, Jayne DR (2016) Efficacy of plasma exchange and immunoadsorption in systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 15:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2015.08.010
Yang M, Liao C, Zhu Q et al (2020) Meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of immunoadsorption for systemic lupus erythematosus among Chinese population. Clin Rheumatol 39:3581–3592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-020-05156-7
Sanz I, Wei C, Jenks SA et al (2019) Challenges and opportunities for consistent classification of human B cell and plasma cell populations. Front Immunol 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02458
Hiddemann W, Kneba M, Dreyling M et al (2005) Frontline therapy with rituximab added to the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) significantly improves the outcome for patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma compared with therapy with CHOP alone: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 106:3725–3732. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-01-0016
Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A et al (2006) The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1390–1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21778
Murphy G, Isenberg DA (2019) New therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus - past imperfect, future tense. Nat Rev Rheumatol 15:403–412. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-019-0235-5
Witt M, Grunke M, Proft F et al (2013) Clinical outcomes and safety of rituximab treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) - results from a nationwide cohort in Germany (GRAID). Lupus 22:1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203313503912
McCarthy EM, Sutton E, Nesbit S et al (2018) Short-term efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register. Rheumatology (Oxford) 57:470–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex395
QuelQuelhas da Costa R, Aguirre-Alastuey ME, Isenberg DA, Saracino AM (2018) Assessment of response to B-cell depletion using rituximab in cutaneous lupus erythematosus. JAMA Dermatol 154:1432–1440. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.3793
Md Yusof MY, Shaw D, El-Sherbiny YM et al (2017) Predicting and managing primary and secondary non-response to rituximab using B-cell biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 76:1829–1836. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211191
Merrill JT, Neuwelt CM, Wallace DJ et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus: the randomized, double-blind, phase II/III systemic lupus erythematosus evaluation of rituximab trial. Arthritis Rheum 62:222–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27233
Rovin BH, Furie R, Latinis K et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active proliferative lupus nephritis: the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab study. Arthritis Rheum 64:1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34359
Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z et al (2012) Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1771–1782. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201940
Hahn BH, McMahon MA, Wilkinson A et al (2012) American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 64:797–808. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21664
Cassia MA, Alberici F, Jones RB et al (2019) Rituximab as maintenance treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter observational study of 147 patients. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:1670–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40932
Carreira PL, Isenberg DA (2019) Recent developments in biologic therapies for the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 58:382–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key064
Genovese MC, Kaine JL, Lowenstein MB et al (2008) Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase I/II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Arthritis Rheum 58:2652–2661. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23732
Mysler EF, Spindler AJ, Guzman R et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in active proliferative lupus nephritis: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. Arthritis Rheum 65:2368–2379. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.38037
Reddy V, Klein C, Isenberg DA et al (2017) Obinutuzumab induces superior B-cell cytotoxicity to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patient samples. Rheumatology (Oxford) 56:1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex067
Clowse ME, Wallace DJ, Furie RA et al (2017) Efficacy and safety of epratuzumab in moderately to severely active systemic lupus erythematosus: results from two phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Arthritis Rheumatol 69:362–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39856
Möckel T, Basta F, Weinmann-Menke J, Schwarting A (2021) B cell activating factor (BAFF): structure, functions, autoimmunity and clinical implications in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Autoimmun Rev 20:102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102736
Stohl W (2012) Biologic differences between various inhibitors of the BLyS/BAFF pathway: should we expect differences between belimumab and other inhibitors in development? Curr Rheumatol Rep 14:303–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-012-0254-6
Ota M, Duong BH, Torkamani A et al (2010) Regulation of the B cell receptor repertoire and self-reactivity by BAFF. J Immunol 185:4128–4136. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1002176
Stohl W (2014) Therapeutic targeting of the BAFF/APRIL axis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Opin Ther Targets 18:473–489. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728222.2014.888415
Nezos A, Evangelopoulos ME, Mavragani CP (2019) Genetic contributors and soluble mediators in prediction of autoimmune comorbidity. J Autoimmun 104:102317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102317
Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O et al (2011) A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 63:3918–3930. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30613
Baert L, Manfroi B, Casez O, Sturm N, Huard B (2018) The role of APRIL - a proliferation inducing ligand - in autoimmune diseases and expectations from its targeting. J Autoimmun 95:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.016
Jacob CO, Guo S, Jacob N et al (2012) Dispensability of APRIL to the development of systemic lupus erythematosus in NZM 2328 mice. Arthritis Rheum 64:1610–1619. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.33458
Jackson SW, Davidson A (2019) BAFF inhibition in SLE-Is tolerance restored? Immunol Rev 292:102–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12810
Mathias LM, Stohl W (2020) Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): emerging therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets 24:1283–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2020.1832464
Navarra SV, Guzmán RM, Gallacher AE et al (2011) Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 377:721–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61354-2
Sthoeger Z, Sharabi A, Mozes E (2014) Novel approaches to the development of targeted therapeutic agents for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun 54:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2014.06.002
Gatto M, Saccon F, Zen M et al (2020) Early disease and low baseline damage as predictors of response to belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life setting. Arthritis Rheumatol 72:1314–1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41253
Furie R, Rovin BH, Houssiau F et al (2020) Two-year, randomized, controlled trial of belimumab in lupus nephritis. N Engl J Med 383:1117–1128. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001180
Merrill JT, Shanahan WR, Scheinberg M, Kalunian KC, Wofsy D, Martin RS (2018) Phase III trial results with blisibimod, a selective inhibitor of B-cell activating factor, in subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 77:883–889. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213032
Merrill JT, van Vollenhoven RF, Buyon JP et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tabalumab, a monoclonal antibody to B-cell activating factor, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: results from ILLUMINATE-2, a 52-week, phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 75:332–340. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207654
Merrill JT, Wallace DJ, Wax S et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of atacicept in patients With systemic lupus erythematosus: results of a twenty-four-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase IIb study. Arthritis Rheumatol 70:266–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40360
López-Herrera G, Vargas-Hernández A, González-Serrano ME et al (2014) Bruton’s tyrosine kinase–an integral protein of B cell development that also has an essential role in the innate immune system. J Leukoc Biol 95:243–250. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0513307
Rankin AL, Seth N, Keegan S et al (2013) Selective inhibition of BTK prevents murine lupus and antibody-mediated glomerulonephritis. J Immunol 191:4540–4550. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1301553
Kil LP, de Bruijn MJ, van Nimwegen M et al (2012) Btk levels set the threshold for B-cell activation and negative selection of autoreactive B cells in mice. Blood 119:3744–3756. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-12-397919
Feng M, Zhou S, Yu Y, Su Q, Li X, Lin W (2021) Regulation of the migration of distinct dendritic cell subsets. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:635221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.635221
Bros M, Jährling F, Renzing A et al (2007) A newly established murine immature dendritic cell line can be differentiated into a mature state, but exerts tolerogenic function upon maturation in the presence of glucocorticoid. Blood 109:3820–3829. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-07-035576
Xia Y, Jiang S, Weng S, Lv X, Cheng H, Fang C (2011) Antigen-specific immature dendritic cell vaccine ameliorates anti-dsDNA antibody-induced renal damage in a mouse model. Rheumatology 50:2187–2196. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ker231
Sthoeger ZM, Dayan M, Tcherniack A et al (2003) Modulation of autoreactive responses of peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus by peptides based on human and murine anti-DNA autoantibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 131:385–392. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02058.x
Sela U, Sharabi A, Dayan M, Hershkoviz R, Mozes E (2009) The role of dendritic cells in the mechanism of action of a peptide that ameliorates lupus in murine models. Immunology 128:e395-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02988.x
Rapoport MJ, Sharabi A, Aharoni D et al (2005) Amelioration of SLE-like manifestations in (NZBxNZW)F1 mice following treatment with a peptide based on the complementarity determining region 1 of an autoantibody is associated with a down-regulation of apoptosis and of the pro-apoptotic factor JNK kinase. Clin Immunol 117:262–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2005.09.003
Parameswaran R, Ben HB, Sharabi A, Zinger H, Mozes E (2009) B-cell activating factor (BAFF) plays a role in the mechanism of action of a tolerogenic peptide that ameliorates lupus. Clin Immunol 131:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2008.12.009
Sthoeger Z, Sharabi A, Zinger H, Asher I, Mozes E (2018) Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase in murine and human systemic lupus erythematosus: down-regulation by the tolerogeneic peptide hCDR1. Clin Immunol 197:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2018.08.012
Mauermann N, Sthoeger Z, Zinger H, Mozes E (2004) Amelioration of lupus manifestations by a peptide based on the complementarity determining region 1 of an autoantibody in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice engrafted with peripheral blood lymphocytes of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Clin Exp Immunol 137:513–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02559.x
Luger D, Dayan M, Zinger H, Liu JP, Mozes E (2004) A peptide based on the complementarity determining region 1 of a human monoclonal autoantibody ameliorates spontaneous and induced lupus manifestations in correlation with cytokine immunomodulation. J Clin Immunol 24:579–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-004-6245-2
Lapter S, Marom A, Meshorer A et al (2009) Amelioration of brain pathology and behavioral dysfunction in mice with lupus following treatment with a tolerogenic peptide. Arthritis Rheum 60:3744–3754. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.25013
Urowitz MB, Isenberg DA, Wallace DJ (2015) Safety and efficacy of hCDR1 (Edratide) in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: results of phase II study. Lupus Sci Med 2:e000104. https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2015-000104
Hahn BH, Singh RR, Wong WK, Tsao BP, Bulpitt K, Ebling FM (2001) Treatment with a consensus peptide based on amino acid sequences in autoantibodies prevents T cell activation by autoantigens and delays disease onset in murine lupus. Arthritis Rheum 44:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(200102)44:2
Singh RP, La Cava A, Hahn BH (2008) pConsensus peptide induces tolerogenic CD8+ T cells in lupus-prone (NZB x NZW)F1 mice by differentially regulating Foxp3 and PD1 molecules. J Immunol 180:2069–2080. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2069
Hahn BH, Anderson M, Le E, La Cava A (2008) Anti-DNA Ig peptides promote Treg cell activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Arthritis Rheum 58:2488–2497. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23609
Skaggs BJ, Lourenço EV, Hahn BH (2011) Oral administration of different forms of a tolerogenic peptide to define the preparations and doses that delay anti-DNA antibody production and nephritis and prolong survival in SLE-prone mice. Lupus 20:912–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961203311398509
Bosch X, Ramos-Casals M, Khamashta MA (2012) The DWEYS peptide in systemic lupus erythematosus. Trends Mol Med 18:215–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2012.01.008
Diamond B, Bloom O, Al Abed Y, Kowal C, Huerta PT, Volpe BT (2011) Moving towards a cure: blocking pathogenic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Intern Med 269:36–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02318.x
Voynova E, Tchorbanov A, Prechl J et al (2008) An antibody-based construct carrying DNA-mimotope and targeting CR1(CD35) selectively suppresses human autoreactive B-lymphocytes. Immunol Lett 116:168–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2007.12.016
VanPatten S, Sun S, He M et al (2016) Amending HIV drugs: a novel small-molecule approach to target lupus anti-dna antibodies. J Med Chem 59:8859–8867. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00694
Bloom O, Cheng KF, He M et al (2011) Generation of a unique small molecule peptidomimetic that neutralizes lupus autoantibody activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:10255–10259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103555108
He M, Cheng KF, VanPatten S, Bloom O, Diamond B, Al-Abed Y (2017) A structural investigation of FISLE-412, a peptidomimetic compound derived from saquinavir that targets lupus autoantibodies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27:4725–4729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.08.070
Altiti AS, Cheng KF, He M, Al-Abed Y (2017) β-Hydroxy-tetrahydroquinolines from quinolines using chloroborane: synthesis of the peptidomimetic FISLE-412. Chemistry 23:10738–10743. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201701944
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82003367) and the Innovation Capability Support Plan of Shaanxi Province (No. 2019TD-034).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Yaqi Wang wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Shengxiang Xiao contributed to the manuscript review. Yumin Xia and Huixia Wang conceived the central idea and finalized the paper.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Xiao, S., Xia, Y. et al. The Therapeutic Strategies for SLE by Targeting Anti-dsDNA Antibodies. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 63, 152–165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08898-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-021-08898-7