Abstract
Follicular thyroid tumors pose a diagnostic challenge on the preoperative level, as the discrimination between follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and adenoma (FTA) demands careful histopathological investigation. Moreover, prognostication of FTCs is mostly based on tumor size and extent of invasive properties, while immunohistochemical markers pinpointing high-risk cases are lacking. We have routinely established a Ki-67 labeling index for follicular thyroid tumors since 1999. To assess the potential value of Ki-67 as an adjunct tool to (1) correctly separate FTCs from FTAs and (2) help identify poor-prognosis FTCs, we collected histopathological and clinical data from 818 follicular thyroid tumors with a histological Ki-67 labeling index established in clinical routine practice (516 FTAs, 252 FTCs, and 50 follicular thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMPs)). The Ki-67 labeling index was higher in FTCs (mean 5.8%) than in FTAs (mean 2.6%) (P < 0.001), and a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 4% to separate FTC from FTA with a sensitivity and specificity of 65% and 83%, respectively. Similarly, a Ki-67 labeling index above 4% was found to identify FTCs that later metastasized from clinically indolent FTCs with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 48%, respectively. Ki-67 constituted an independent predictor of future FTC metastases/recurrence and death of disease, and a value > 4% was a reliable prognostic marker within individual pT staging groups. We conclude that Ki-67 is a potentially valuable marker for the prognostication of FTCs, and future implementation in the histopathological assessments of follicular thyroid tumors could be beneficial if reproduced in international series.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
From a diagnostic and prognostic perspective, there is no doubt that follicular thyroid tumors constitute one of the most clinically challenging entities in terms of thyroid neoplasia. As the preoperative assessment is to date unable to reliably differentiate between follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) and adenoma (FTA), this distinction is reserved for the surgical pathologist when assessing invasive properties using standardized histopathology [1]. However, even in the hands of an experienced diagnostician, these lesions are sometimes notoriously difficult to evaluate, not least exemplified by the borderline category “follicular tumors of uncertain malignant potential” (FT-UMPs) [1]. In addition to the present diagnostic limitations, the prognostication of an FTC patient is based on the age at surgery, the overall TNM stage, and the histological subtyping of tumors into either minimally invasive (miFTC), encapsulated angioinvasive (eaiFTC) or widely invasive (wiFTCs) [1, 2]. Even so, the histological subtyping is not always straightforward and might potentially differ between institutions, and immunohistochemical markers indicative of invasive behavior are generally lacking in the clinical setting, although several proteins have been previously proposed [3,4,5,6,7].
In endocrine pathology, the Ki-67 proliferation labeling index is a well-known marker, not least exemplified by the ability to grade gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors into subgroups of prognostic and therapeutic relevance [1]. Moreover, Ki-67 has also been proven valuable for highlighting the metastatic potential in pheochromocytomas and abdominal paragangliomas, adrenocortical tumors, and parathyroid tumors [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Although there is currently no established role for Ki-67 in the diagnostic or prognostic work-up of thyroid tumors according to the 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, a higher proliferation index has been reported in cases with poor outcome [1, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Ki-67 could therefore be considered a potentially helpful marker when assessing thyroid neoplasia from a prognostic perspective. In terms of follicular thyroid tumors, a Ki-67 labeling index of > 5% has been reported to predict worse outcome in minimally invasive FTCs, and a preoperative Ki-67 labeling index > 5% in fine needle aspiration biopsies (FNABs) has been associated with FTCs as opposed to FTAs [15, 24]. At our department, most follicular thyroid tumors have been assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry since the methodology was established in clinical routine practice in 1999, and the labeling index has been an integrated part of the pathology report whenever an FTC is signed out. We therefore sought to investigate the potential of this marker in the diagnostic and prognostic context by collecting data from a large cohort of follicular thyroid tumors with long-term follow-up data.
Methods
Study Cohort
Since this is a purely retrospective analysis, we included all follicular thyroid tumors (solitary or multifocal) surgically removed and diagnosed at Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden, for which a Ki-67 labeling index was listed in the final pathology report. Second-opinion cases from outside hospitals were excluded to avoid referral bias. The tumor cohort (n = 818) included 516 FTAs, 50 FT-UMPs, and 252 FTCs, starting in 1999 when the Ki-67 immunostaining was first clinically available at our department. During 1999–2014, a Ki-67 labeling index was acquired for all diagnosed FTCs as well as subsets of FTAs at the discretion of the responsible endocrine pathologist at that time (most often larger tumors). From 2015 and onwards, the procedure was standardized to encompass all follicular thyroid tumors, irrespective of tumor type or size. All tumors entitled “atypical follicular thyroid tumors” before the advent of the FT-UMP terminology in the 2017 WHO classification were re-investigated according to these FT-UMP criteria by two pathologists (LSH and CCJ) [1].
Reviews of Pathology Reports and Medical Charts
Our department is a tertiary center for thyroid surgery with a catchment area of approximately 2.3 million inhabitants and > 1000 thyroidectomies performed annually. We screened our institutional electronic pathology database for follicular thyroid tumors diagnosed at the Karolinska University Hospital in Solna with an electronic search function using Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) codes T96 (for thyroid, unspecified lobe), M833 and M823 (for follicular thyroid tumors), M829 (for oncocytic tumors), and M814 (for “adenomas”). All pathology reports were read by a single author (LSH) and histopathological variables for all cases with an established Ki-67 labeling index were retrieved, including diagnosis, tumor size, type of invasion (capsular/vascular), extrathyroidal extension (ETE), and the pTNM cancer stage [2]. Angioinvasion was defined as an intravascular tumor thrombus with associated fibrin within the outer layers or beyond the contour of the tumoral capsule. If findings were equivocal, level sectioning, van Gieson stains, and/or endothelial cell immunohistochemical markers were usually procured. Only non-functioning, bona fide follicular tumors were included in the study, thereby excluding toxic adenomas, hyalinizing trabecular tumors, tumors with a poorly differentiated component, and/or co-existing papillary or medullary thyroid cancer. Well-differentiated thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential (WDT-UMPs) were also excluded from the study as the true origin of these lesions is debated. All FTCs were re-classified to adhere to the most recent WHO terminology with three subgroups (miFTC, eaiFTC, wiFTC) [1]. Furthermore, since oncocytic tumors were introduced as a separate entity in 2017, pathology reports prior to this year contain a mix of conventional follicular thyroid tumors as well as “oxyphilic” or “Hürthle cell” follicular thyroid tumors. We tackled this issue by assigning a status of “oncocytic differentiation” to all tumors exhibiting these features irrespective of which WHO classification they were originally diagnosed under. Another author (AS) reviewed the medical charts for all included patients and listed conventional clinical parameters, including age at surgery, sex, metastatic disease, and patient outcomes. Tumor recurrences and distant metastases were documented through radiology for all cases, as well as serum thyroglobulin measurements for subsets of cases.
Tissue Handling and the Ki-67 Labeling Index
The advantage of a retrospective mono-institutional analysis using clinical routine Ki-67 reporting is the consistency of tissue handling. At our department, thyroid tumors are macroscopically handled by subspecialized endocrine pathologists, and the vast majority of tumors included in this study has been cut and sampled by two individuals, which are both authors of this paper. The tissue handling protocol follows a standardized format, in which samples are macroscopically investigated directly after excision, then fixated in formalin. After proper fixation, specimens are cut with a 5-mm thickness and sampled for histological investigations.
The Ki-67 immunohistochemistry and scoring procedures for postoperative specimens at our department have followed a consistent model since its launch in 1999. From each case, a representative section of the primary tumor was selected for subsequent Ki-67 immunohistochemistry using a standardized methodology in a clinical laboratory setting at our department. Sections of lymph nodes were used as positive controls, and various de-identified parenchymatous tissues were used as negative controls. Between 1999 and 2002, the immunohistochemical staining was performed through manual routine by a small group of experienced lab technicians using the avidin–biotin complex Vectastain method (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). From 2003 onwards, automated staining procedures were used; first the BenchMark XT followed by the BenchMark ULTRA (Ventana Medical Systems, AZ, USA) in 2009. From 1999 to 2015, the Mib-1 antibody clone (Immunotech, Marseille, France) was used as a primary antibody, but was replaced in 2016 by the CONFIRM anti-Ki-67 antibody (clone 30–9, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Since no official guidelines for establishing a Ki-67 labeling index in thyroid tumors exist, the scoring methodology was established in 1999 as manual counting of 2000 cells using hot spot areas and an ocular grid, based on contemporary guidelines used for neuroendocrine tumors [25]. This procedure was consistently applied throughout the study period irrespective of the staining methodology or antibody clone used. Representative sections were chosen at random, but in FTCs often coincided with the area of invasion (data not shown). Hot spot areas were chosen through visual inspection at low power magnification. The vast majority of cases from the entire study period was signed out by two dedicated endocrine pathologists (AH and CCJ). To confirm the reproducibility of the method, subsets of cases from different time periods were retrieved and re-counted by a single pathologist (CCJ), and the blinded results were then compared to the original pathology reports.
Comparisons to Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Promoter Mutations and Gene Expression
In terms of molecular risk stratification of follicular thyroid tumors, TERT gene aberrancies are recognized as markers of worse clinical outcomes [26,27,28]. We included molecular data from 62 FTCs regarding TERT promoter mutations using Sanger sequencing and TERT gene expression from quantitative real-time PCR analyses derived from an earlier publication, and correlated these parameters to the Ki-67 indices [29].
Statistical Analyses
The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Chi-square test was used to compare differences in categorical variables such as the presence of metastasis/recurrent disease, death of disease, and associations to TERT promoter mutations and TERT gene expression. Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare differences between continuous variables such as size, age at surgery, and Ki-67 labeling index. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare differences between multiple subgroups of FTC. Cox regressions were used in both univariate and multivariate analyses in order to find predictors of metastasis/recurrence and death of disease. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) analyses were used to establish cut-offs for Ki-67 labeling indices and to calculate sensitivity and specificity for these cut-off values. Survival analyses were performed with a log-rank test and illustrated with Kaplan–Meier plots for the endpoints time to metastatic event/recurrent disease (disease-free survival) and time to death of disease. Cohen’s kappa test was applied to test for reproducibility of the Ki-67 scoring procedure. For all analyses, P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
General Characteristics of the Study Cohort
The procedure for tumor inclusion is illustrated in Fig. 1. A total of 1787 thyroid tumors were retrieved using SNOMED-based searches in our institutional pathology database. We excluded 865 tumors due to the lack of a Ki-67 index (841 adenomas and 24 carcinomas), 74 tumors since they were toxic adenomas or hyalinizing trabecular tumors, and 30 tumors since they displayed either a component of poorly differentiated carcinoma, WDT-UMP, or medullary thyroid carcinoma. In total, 818 follicular tumors derived from 809 patients with a Ki-67 labeling index listed in the pathology report were included in the study (516 FTAs, 50 FT-UMPs and 252 FTCs) (Fig. 1). The histological and clinical parameters for the 818 tumors in the study are summarized in Table 1. FTCs were subclassified as either miFTC (n = 120), eaiFTC (n = 34), wiFTC (n = 95), or FTCs with a predominant macrofollicular growth pattern (n = 2). One tumor lacked sufficient information in order to be subclassified into a certain growth pattern subgroup. Seventy-five tumors displayed oncocytic differentiation. The mean follow-up time for all FTCs was 68.5 months, ranging from 2 to 255 (median 54) months. A total of 47 patients exhibited distant metastases or local recurrences at follow-up (45 FTC patients and 2 FT-UMP patients), and 20 died of disease (19 FTC patients, 1 FT-UMP patient). The FTCs were in general larger than FTAs (41 vs 31 mm, P < 0.001), and patients with FTC were generally older than those with FTA (55 vs 50 years, P < 0.001). FTCs and FT-UMPs did not differ significantly regarding size (41 vs 39 mm, P = 0.87), or regarding age at surgery (55 vs 53 years, P = 0.28). The FT-UMPs were, like FTCs, in general larger than FTAs (39 vs 31 mm, P < 0.001) but did not differ significantly regarding age at surgery (53 vs 50 years, P = 0.21).
Diagnostic Properties of the Ki-67 Labeling Index
The average Ki-67 labeling indices were 2.6% (range 0.5–17) for FTAs, 5.1% (range 1–14) for FT-UMPs, and 5.8% (range 1–32) for FTCs. There were no significant differences in Ki-67 index between different subgroups of FTC (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.71) (Table 2). Overall, FTCs displayed higher Ki-67 indices than FTAs (Mann–Whitney U, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2A) but not higher than FT-UMPs (P = 0.30). FT-UMPs exhibited higher Ki-67 indices than FTA (P < 0.001). Moreover, a ROC curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of ≥ 4.0% to separate FTC from FTA with a sensitivity and specificity of 65% and 83%, respectively (Fig. 2B). Photomicrographs of follicular thyroid tumors exhibiting high and low Ki-67 labeling indices are presented in Fig. 2C–D.
Prognostic Relevance of the Ki-67 Labeling Index
When assessing the prognostic relevance of the Ki-67 labeling index in FTCs, we first performed a Cox regression for each of the assessed pathological and clinical parameters with either metastasis/recurrence or death of disease as outcome variables. We analyzed factors such as age at surgery, sex, primary tumor size, the Ki-67 labeling index, presence of ETE, capsular invasion, vascular invasion, oncocytic differentiation, and pTNM. All parameters that were significant predictors of metastasis/recurrence and/or death of disease when analyzed separately were analyzed together in a multivariate Cox regression analysis. The results are presented in Table 3 and show that age at surgery, the Ki-67 labeling index, and the presence of ETE are independent predictors of metastatic/recurrent disease (disease-free survival), whereas the Ki-67 labeling index and age at surgery were independent factors foreseeing patients succumbing to disease.
A ROC curve analysis was performed to establish an optimal cut-off for the detection of FTCs that would subsequently behave metastatic/recurrent and generated a Ki-67 labeling index of > 4%, with a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 48% (Fig. 3A). To build on this, a survival analysis with the endpoint time to metastatic event/recurrence triaged FTCs with a Ki-67 cut-off of 4% into two separate risk groups (log-rank test, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3B), and a similar outcome was noted when the endpoint was death of disease (log-rank, P = 0.005).
TNM Stratification
The TNM system is a globally accepted classification for prognosticating human cancers, and all auxiliary analyses aimed to improve the risk assessment of tumors should therefore be compared to the current gold standard. The pT stage takes the primary tumor size and the extent of the tumor into consideration, making this parameter quite straightforward to establish and reproduce between institutions. We therefore analyzed the outcome of the Ki-67 labeling index within each pT stage group (pT1-4) for all FTCs (Table 4). In terms of clinical outcome, the rate of metastases/recurrence within each pT stage group was significantly higher in pT3-4 FTCs compared with pT1-2 FTCs (chi-square P < 0.001), which was also true for the outcome “death of disease” (chi-square P = 0.009). The Ki-67 labeling index was not significantly higher in pT3-4 FTCs than in pT1-2 tumors (Mann–Whitney U, P = 0.64). Kaplan–Meier analyses for FTCs within individual pT staging groups revealed a shorter time to metastatic events/recurrence for FTCs with a Ki-67 labeling index of > 4% as compared to ≤ 4% for stages pT1, pT2, and pT3, while all pT4 tumors exhibited a Ki-67 > 4% (Fig. 4).
Associations to TERT Promoter Mutation and Gene Expression
When comparing TERT promoter mutation status or the presence of TERT gene expression with Ki-67 indices > 4% in FTCs using cross-tabulation, significant correlations to TERT promoter mutations (p = 0.04, Pearson chi-square) and the presence of TERT gene expression (< 0.001, Pearson chi-square) were noted. Further analyses of quantitative TERT gene expression levels revealed a significant correlation between a Ki-67 index of > 4% and absolute TERT expression levels (p < 0.001, Mann Whitney U). No correlation was found when comparing TERT promoter mutational status with the absolute numbers of Ki-67 proliferation indices (p = 0.15, Mann Whitney U).
Reproducibility of the Ki-67 Labeling Index over Time
At our department, the Ki-67 stain was originally performed manually before changed to automatic staining, and the study period also included different antibody clones. One pathologist (CCJ) therefore reviewed and recounted 30 cases from different time periods (including manually and automatically stained slides, as well as slides stained with the Mib-1 and CONFIRM clones) to check whether the Ki-67 results were concordant today as when they were originally reported. The mean deviation between recounting results and original scores was 0.12 percentage points, ranging from − 1 to + 1 percentage points. Setting the cut-off at 4%, only one case (3%) changed groups (an FTA with a Ki-67 index of 4% in the original report, and 4.2% in the recounting). A Cohen’s Kappa score of 0.918 was obtained when comparing recounting results with the original pathology reports, indicating adequate agreement irrespectively of the time period.
Discussion
The arrival of next-generation sequencing techniques has the potential to improve the diagnostic and prognostic capacity of modern pathology laboratories, potentially allowing the diagnostician to fine-tune the clinical work-up of follicular thyroid tumors. However, as many of these analyses are still expensive and labor-intense and demand stringent validation, histology in combination with standardized and well-established immunohistochemical markers is still the cornerstone in endocrine pathology. Ki-67 is a nuclear antigen that is intimately associated with the tumoral proliferative capacity, and most endocrine pathologists in tertiary centers are well familiar with the interpretation and scoring of this marker. As subsets of follicular thyroid tumors may be notoriously difficult to diagnose and prognosticate even in the hand of experienced thyroid cancer experts, we sought to investigate the value of the Ki-67 labeling index in this aspect by a retrospective analysis of the hitherto largest tumor cohort to date with available long-term follow-up data.
In our series, we found that the Ki-67 labeling index was higher overall in FTCs than in FTAs, and a cut-off at 4% showed a 65% sensitivity and an 83% specificity towards identifying FTC and excluding FTA. Since FTAs are more commonly encountered than FTCs in clinical practice, any marker with the ambition to separate these entities need to exhibit high specificity to avoid an excessive number of false positives. In this aspect, a cut-off at 4% was optimal according to the ROC analysis. However, the diagnostic process is based on gold standard histopathological examination, and the observed overlap in Ki-67 indices between FTCs and FTAs makes this marker of limited value in the postoperative setting. Even so, our data are in line with a previous FNAB study in which a Ki-67 cut-off value of 5% was suggested to identify FTCs, thereby somewhat reinforcing the idea that this marker could exhibit diagnostic properties on the preoperative level [24].
In terms of prognostication, Ki-67 was an independent predictor of metastatic events and death of disease in our cohort. Moreover, FTCs with a Ki-67 labeling index > 4% were significantly associated with metastatic/recurrent disease and poorer patient outcome. This was also true for FTCs stratified within the individual pT staging group, suggesting that Ki-67 holds prognostic value independent of primary tumor size. This could be particularly beneficial when assessing smaller FTCs (pT1a/b), as these patients are considered low risk and might therefore not receive additional surgery or ablation radioiodine treatment [30]. In future studies, it would be interesting to see if patients with pT1a/b FTCs and a Ki-67 index of > 4% could benefit from adjuvant treatment, given the increased risk of poor outcome indicated from our data. Moreover, a comparison to molecular markers that may indicate a worse prognosis in FTCs should also be performed to investigate if the Ki-67 index in combination with molecular analyses may be a way forward to individualize the prognostication of these lesions [26, 31,32,33]. Indeed, in this study, FTCs with Ki-67 indices > 4% were significantly associated with TERT promoter mutations as well as with the presence of TERT gene expression. The notion that FTCs with a Ki-67 index > 4% are overrepresented in terms of TERT aberrancies thus supports our conclusion that these lesions may be associated with a poorer prognosis. Indeed, previous studies indicate that both TERT promoter mutations and TERT mRNA expression indicate worse clinical outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinoma and may also be associated to higher Ki-67 indices [29, 34,35,36].
The study is not without limitations. Given the retrospective nature and the initial lack of standardization in terms of which FTAs were analyzed, there is a risk of selection bias when the responsible pathologist more likely ordered a Ki-67 immunohistochemical stain for equivocal cases or large FTAs than for straightforward tumors. Even so, the large sample size, the long follow-up time, the uniform scoring procedure (counting 2000 cells in hot spot areas), and the reproducibility over time make the results valid from a clinical screening perspective. Moreover, even though we re-analyzed subsets of cases stained during different time periods to exclude tissue handling bias, we cannot fully exclude that differences in the laboratory protocols could affect the staining quality and hence the ensuing interpretation. Furthermore, apart from our analyses of TERT promoter mutations and expression in this study, we lack comprehensive molecular data for the cohort, making comparisons to current genomic classifiers (such as ThyroSeq or Afirma) unfeasible [37, 38]. As modern pathology laboratories will probably see a future integration of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetics in order to provide the most detailed prognostication in terms of FTCs, a combination of sequencing data and mRNA/protein expression–based analyses will probably be needed to obtain superior sensitivity and specificity in clinical routine practice. For example, the addition of NRAS Q61R mutation–specific immunohistochemistry could have added value to our work, and future efforts will be needed to correlate RAS mutational status to the proliferative abilities of follicular thyroid tumors [39].
There might also be several FTCs in this cohort classified by the 2004 or 2017 WHO criteria that could be considered as differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinomas (DHGTCs), a group of thyroid malignant tumors characterized by a well-differentiated growth pattern, but with an elevated mitotic count and/or tumor necrosis [40]. Indeed, Hiltzik and colleagues recently proposed the entity “non-solid/trabecular/insular type of poorly differentiated carcinoma” which had high-grade features (increased mitoses and tumor necrosis) [41], and a Ki-67 index of ≥ 4% in tumors fulfilling the “Hiltzik criteria” was an independent predictor of cause-specific survival in an independent series [42]. When manually reading pathology reports from cases included in the current study, we found no FTC cases that presented with extensive elevations of the mitotic count and/or tumor necrosis. However, this could be due to reporting bias, since the DHGTC criteria were not established at the time of diagnosis. Even so, it makes sense that highly proliferative follicular thyroid carcinomas associated with TERT gene aberrancies are indeed high-grade lesions, which is also the case in this study. Therefore, a thorough histological overhaul of our cohort using the upcoming 2022 WHO criteria for DHGTCs would constitute an interesting follow-up project [40].
Finally, although our data indicate a promising role for Ki-67 in the risk assessment of follicular thyroid tumors, a general recommendation to include the Ki-67 labeling index in the histopathological work-up of follicular thyroid tumors necessitates standardization of interpretation and international calibrations, and therefore, multi-center studies are required—not least since different institutions have different tissue handling and immunohistochemical protocols that may affect the interpretation of the staining.
We conclude that the Ki-67 labeling index is a potentially valuable marker for the prognostication of FTCs. If sufficiently reproduced in international series, the implementation in clinical routine histopathological assessments of follicular thyroid tumors should be considered.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during the current study will be available upon reasonable request.
References
Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Klöppel G, Rosai J, International Agency for Research on Cancer (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs, 4th edition. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
Amin MB, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society (2017) AJCC cancer staging manual, Eight edition / editor-in-chief, Mahul B. Amin, MD, FCAP ; editors, Stephen B. Edge, MD, FACS [and 16 others] ; Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR-Technical editor ; Laura R. Meyer, CAPM-Managing editor. American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer, Chicago IL
Werner TA, Dizdar L, Nolten I, Riemer JC, Mersch S, Schütte SC, Driemel C, Verde PE, Raba K, Topp SA, Schott M, Knoefel WT, Krieg A (2017) Survivin and XIAP - two potential biological targets in follicular thyroid carcinoma. Sci Rep 7:11383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11426-3
Wu J, Zhang Y, Cheng R, Gong W, Ding T, Zhai Q, Wang Y, Meng B, Sun B (2019) Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators TWIST, SLUG and SNAIL in follicular thyroid tumours may relate to widely invasive, poorly differentiated and distant metastasis. Histopathology 74:780–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13778
Nicolson NG, Paulsson JO, Juhlin CC, Carling T, Korah R (2020) Transcription Factor Profiling Identifies Spatially Heterogenous Mediators of Follicular Thyroid Cancer Invasion. Endocr Pathol 31:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09651-0
Orlandi F, Saggiorato E, Pivano G, Puligheddu B, Termine A, Cappia S, De Giuli P, Angeli A (1998) Galectin-3 is a presurgical marker of human thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 58:3015–3020
Xu XC, el-Naggar AK, Lotan R (1995) Differential expression of galectin-1 and galectin-3 in thyroid tumors. Potential diagnostic implications. Am J Pathol 147:815–822
Lloyd RV, Carney JA, Ferreiro JA, Jin L, Thompson GB, Van Heerden JA, Grant CS, Wollan PC (1995) Immunohistochemical Analysis of the Cell Cycle-Associated Antigens Ki-67 and Retinoblastoma Protein in Parathyroid Carcinomas and Adenomas. Endocr Pathol 6:279–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738728
Juhlin CC, Erickson LA (2021) Genomics and Epigenomics in Parathyroid Neoplasia: from Bench to Surgical Pathology Practice. Endocr Pathol 32:17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09656-9
Pennanen M, Heiskanen I, Sane T, Remes S, Mustonen H, Haglund C, Arola J (2015) Helsinki score-a novel model for prediction of metastases in adrenocortical carcinomas. Hum Pathol 46:404–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2014.11.015
Juhlin CC, Bertherat J, Giordano TJ, Hammer GD, Sasano H, Mete O (2021) What Did We Learn from the Molecular Biology of Adrenal Cortical Neoplasia? From Histopathology to Translational Genomics. Endocr Pathol 32:102–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-021-09667-0
Kimura N, Takayanagi R, Takizawa N, Itagaki E, Katabami T, Kakoi N, Rakugi H, Ikeda Y, Tanabe A, Nigawara T, Ito S, Kimura I, Naruse M, Phaeochromocytoma Study Group in Japan (2014) Pathological grading for predicting metastasis in phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Relat Cancer 21:405–414. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-13-0494
Juhlin CC (2021) Challenges in Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas: from Histology to Molecular Immunohistochemistry. Endocr Pathol 32:228–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-021-09675-0
Kakudo K, Wakasa T, Ohta Y, Yane K, Ito Y, Yamashita H (2015) Prognostic classification of thyroid follicular cell tumors using Ki-67 labeling index: risk stratification of thyroid follicular cell carcinomas. Endocr J 62:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ14-0293
Ito Y, Hirokawa M, Miyauchi A, Masuoka H, Yabuta T, Fukushima M, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Kobayashi K, Miya A (2016) Prognostic impact of Ki-67 labeling index in minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma. Endocr J 63:913–917. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ16-0277
Katoh R, Bray CE, Suzuki K, Komiyama A, Hemmi A, Kawaoi A, Oyama T, Sugai T, Sasou S (1995) Growth activity in hyperplastic and neoplastic human thyroid determined by an immunohistochemical staining procedure using monoclonal antibody MIB-1. Hum Pathol 26:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0046-8177(95)90029-2
Erickson LA, Jin L, Wollan PC, Thompson GB, van Heerden J, Lloyd RV (1998) Expression of p27kip1 and Ki-67 in benign and malignant thyroid tumors. Mod Pathol 11:169–174
Tallini G, Garcia-Rostan G, Herrero A, Zelterman D, Viale G, Bosari S, Carcangiu ML (1999) Downregulation of p27KIP1 and Ki67/Mib1 labeling index support the classification of thyroid carcinoma into prognostically relevant categories. Am J Surg Pathol 23:678–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199906000-00007
Rickert D, Mittermayer C, Lindenfelser R, Biesterfeld S (2000) MIB-1 immunohistometry of follicular adenoma and follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 22:229–234
Ludvíková M, Holubec L, Ryska A, Topolcan O (2005) Proliferative markers in diagnosis of thyroid tumors: a comparative study of MIB-1 and topoisomerase II-a immunostaining. Anticancer Res 25:1835–1840
Sofiadis A, Tani E, Foukakis T, Kjellman P, Skoog L, Höög A, Wallin G, Zedenius J, Larsson C (2009) Diagnostic and prognostic potential of MIB-1 proliferation index in thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy. Int J Oncol 35:369–374
Kjellman P, Wallin G, Höög A, Auer G, Larsson C, Zedenius J (2003) MIB-1 index in thyroid tumors: a predictor of the clinical course in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 13:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1089/105072503321669866
Lindfors H, Ihre Lundgren C, Zedenius J, Juhlin CC, Shabo I (2021) The Clinical Significance of Lymph Node Ratio and Ki-67 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. World J Surg 45:2155–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06070-y
Mu N, Juhlin CC, Tani E, Sofiadis A, Reihnér E, Zedenius J, Larsson C, Nilsson I-L (2018) High Ki-67 index in fine needle aspiration cytology of follicular thyroid tumors is associated with increased risk of carcinoma. Endocrine 61:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1627-z
Rindi G, Klöppel G, Alhman H, Caplin M, Couvelard A, de Herder WW, Erikssson B, Falchetti A, Falconi M, Komminoth P, Körner M, Lopes JM, McNicol A-M, Nilsson O, Perren A, Scarpa A, Scoazec J-Y, Wiedenmann B, all other Frascati Consensus Conference participants, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) (2006) TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch 449:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-006-0250-1
Hysek M, Paulsson JO, Jatta K, Shabo I, Stenman A, Höög A, Larsson C, Zedenius J, Juhlin CC (2019) Clinical Routine TERT Promoter Mutational Screening of Follicular Thyroid Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential (FT-UMPs): A Useful Predictor of Metastatic Disease. Cancers (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11101443
Juhlin CC (2020) A Clinical Overview of Telomerase-Associated Aberrancies in Follicular Thyroid Tumors as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers: Tert Alert! Scand J Surg 109:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1457496919850434
Liu T, Wang N, Cao J, Sofiadis A, Dinets A, Zedenius J, Larsson C, Xu D (2014) The age- and shorter telomere-dependent TERT promoter mutation in follicular thyroid cell-derived carcinomas. Oncogene 33:4978–4984. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.446
Paulsson JO, Mu N, Shabo I, Wang N, Zedenius J, Larsson C, Juhlin CC (2018) TERT aberrancies: a screening tool for malignancy in follicular thyroid tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 25:723–733. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-18-0050
American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Hauger BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, Mazzaferri EL, McIver B, Pacini F, Schlumberger M, Sherman SI, Steward DL, Tuttle RM (2009) Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 19:1167–1214. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.0110
Nicolson NG, Murtha TD, Dong W, Paulsson JO, Choi J, Barbieri AL, Brown TC, Kunstman JW, Larsson C, Prasad ML, Korah R, Lifton RP, Juhlin CC, Carling T (2018) Comprehensive Genetic Analysis of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma Predicts Prognosis Independent of Histology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:2640–2650. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00277
Bournaud C, Descotes F, Decaussin-Petrucci M, Berthiller J, de la Fouchardière C, Giraudet A-L, Bertholon-Gregoire M, Robinson P, Lifante J-C, Lopez J, Borson-Chazot F (2019) TERT promoter mutations identify a high-risk group in metastasis-free advanced thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 108:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.003
Landa I, Ganly I, Chan TA, Mitsutake N, Matsuse M, Ibrahimpasic T, Ghossein RA, Fagin JA (2013) Frequent somatic TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer: higher prevalence in advanced forms of the disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E1562-1566. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2383
Tanaka A, Matsuse M, Saenko V, Nakao T, Yamanouchi K, Sakimura C, Yano H, Nishihara E, Hirokawa M, Suzuki K, Miyauchi A, Eguchi S, Yoshiura K-I, Yamashita S, Nagayasu T, Mitsutake N (2019) TERT mRNA Expression as a Novel Prognostic Marker in Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 29:1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2018.0695
Hellgren LS, Olsson A, Kaufeldt A, Paulsson JO, Hysek M, Stenman A, Zedenius J, Larsson C, Höög A, Juhlin CC (2021) Nuclear-specific accumulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) mRNA in TERT promoter mutated follicular thyroid tumours visualised by in situ hybridisation: a possible clinical screening tool? J Clin Pathol jclinpath-2021–207631. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207631
Hysek M, Jatta K, Hellgren LS, Stenman A, Larsson C, Zedenius J, Juhlin CC (2021) Spatial Distribution Patterns of Clinically Relevant TERT Promoter Mutations in Follicular Thyroid Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential: Advantages of the Digital Droplet PCR Technique. J Mol Diagn 23:212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.10.016
Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Roy S, Durso MB, Nikiforov YE (2013) Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E1852-1860. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-2292
Duick DS, Klopper JP, Diggans JC, Friedman L, Kennedy GC, Lanman RB, McIver B (2012) The impact of benign gene expression classifier test results on the endocrinologist-patient decision to operate on patients with thyroid nodules with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration cytopathology. Thyroid 22:996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2012.0180
Baloch Z, Mete O, Asa SL (2018) Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Thyroid Pathology. Endocr Pathol 29:91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-018-9532-9
Baloch ZW, Asa SL, Barletta JA, Ghossein RA, Juhlin CC, Jung CK, LiVolsi VA, Papotti MG, Sobrinho Simões M, Tallini G, Mete O (2022) Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms. Endocrine Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09707-3
Hiltzik D, Carlson DL, Tuttle RM, Chuai S, Ishill N, Shaha A, Shah JP, Singh B, Ghossein RA (2006) Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas defined on the basis of mitosis and necrosis: a clinicopathologic study of 58 patients. Cancer 106:1286–1295. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21739
Gnemmi V, Renaud F, Do Cao C, Salleron J, Lion G, Wemeau J-L, Copin M-C, Carnaille B, Leteurtre E, Pattou F, Aubert S (2014) Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas: application of the Turin proposal provides prognostic results similar to those from the assessment of high-grade features. Histopathology 64:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12246
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institutet. This study was financially supported by grants provided by the Swedish Cancer Society, the Swedish Society for Medical Research, and the Stockholm City Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (approval number 2015–959–31).
Consent to participate
All patients gave their written informed consent to participate.
Consent for publication
All patients gave their consent to publish generated data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hellgren, L.S., Stenman, A., Paulsson, J.O. et al. Prognostic Utility of the Ki-67 Labeling Index in Follicular Thyroid Tumors: a 20-Year Experience from a Tertiary Thyroid Center. Endocr Pathol 33, 231–242 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09714-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09714-4