Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Why carry out this review? |
Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) form part of a large group of prevalent psychiatric disorders, and are frequently comorbid. |
These manuscripts describe presentations from a virtual symposium titled “GAD and Depression: Contemporary Treatment Approaches” as part of the Industry Science Exchange sessions that took place as at the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology 33rd Congress in September 2020. |
What was learned from the review? |
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are considered first-line therapy in patients with GAD, but agents with a different mechanism of action may also be considered in those who do not respond to or tolerate these therapies. |
Patients with MDD with symptoms of GAD, also referred to as anxious depression, should be managed with an antidepressant that has anti-anxiety effects. |
Greater recognition of anxious depression is needed as this condition is often accompanied by increased suicidality and the need for more robust treatment. |
EDITORIAL
Anxiety and depression form a large group of interrelated, overlapping psychiatric disorders whose precise taxonomy and terminology can at first be confusing. In this supplement, we will mainly discuss generalised anxiety disorder (GAD), major depressive disorder (MDD) and anxious depression. Figure 1 shows how GAD and MDD fit into the overall disease classifications of anxiety and depressive disorders, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition; commonly referred to as DSM-5) [1].
Current diagnostic criteria for GAD and MDD are shown in Table 1. GAD and MDD are prevalent, debilitating illnesses that frequently coexist [2]. In severe cases, GAD may be associated with disabling symptoms, social and occupational impairment, an increased risk of suicidality, and reportedly low rates of treatment response [3, 4]. In patients with a major depressive episode, coexisting symptoms of anxiety (or ‘anxious depression’) increase the severity of depression, worsen functional impairment, reduce quality of life, and add to the economic burden [5]. Although there are now effective treatments for GAD, many patients do not respond, are unable to tolerate them, or experience discontinuation symptoms when treatment is stopped [6]. Additionally, there are effective treatments for anxious depression, but these have been less thoroughly researched [7].
At a population level, the burden of human disease (or ‘health loss’) can be measured in terms of disability adjusted life-years (DALYs). The total number of DALYs for a given population has two components: premature death, which is quantified as the number of years of life lost due to disease or injury; and morbidity, which is quantified as the number of years lived with disability (YLD) [8]. YLD is particularly relevant to mental illnesses such as GAD and MDD. Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 show that the societal impact of anxiety and depression is extremely high, in both absolute and relative terms. Both disorders are associated with very significant global health losses, predominantly due to high numbers of associated YLDs (Table 2) [9, 10]. Importantly, these losses are seen globally, occurring in low- and middle-income countries, as well as in wealthier nations [10]. Moreover, both disorders are prominent contributors to global DALYs among adults of working age [9], a finding with considerable socioeconomic implications. In the USA, MDD was the second-largest contributor to YLDs in 2010, while anxiety disorders together were the fifth largest [11]. The percentage of global YLDs attributable to depression and anxiety remained relatively stable between 1990 and 2019 [10]; this is despite considerable ongoing research, the availability of numerous effective pharmacotherapies, and the growth and diversification of psychological treatment options.
Traditionally, clinical psychiatry has emphasised treatment rather than prevention and focused on manifestations rather than causes. Moving forward, should psychiatry shift its focus to identifying at-risk individuals and intervening earlier, with the objectives of preventing illness or reducing its severity and duration? Screening for at-risk individuals or possible causes of GAD (e.g. excessive perceived threat), as well as symptoms and signs of GAD in patients with or without MDD, could form part of such a strategy, given that GAD often has earlier onset than MDD and may increase vulnerability to developing MDD. Additionally, there is growing interest and research into the neurobiological mechanisms of GAD, which may ultimately allow for the development of targeted treatments. Evolutionary medicine may also offer clues as to how we approach GAD and MDD in the future, e.g. by viewing anxiety and depression as adaptive responses to particular circumstances, which may at times be excessive, analogous to the current understanding of allergies based on adaptive immune responses, which at times are disproportionate.
For now, we have effective pharmacotherapies both for GAD and for anxiety associated with MDD. In both conditions, treatment has the potential to decrease or relieve symptoms, improve or restore functioning, and increase health-related quality of life. From a public health point of view, the cost-effectiveness of treatments for GAD and MDD is worth emphasising. In this supplement, we review the evidence base that supports treatments for GAD in 2021—both pharmacological and non-pharmacological—with a particular focus on recent meta-analyses and emerging treatments. We will also explore how our understanding of the relationship between anxiety and depression has evolved, and summarise current best practice in the management of anxious depression.
References
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric; 2013.
Saha S, Lim CCW, Cannon DL, et al. Co-morbidity between mood and anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety. 2020;38(3):286–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23113.
Remes O, Wainwright N, Surtees P, Lafortune L, Khaw KT, Brayne C. Generalised anxiety disorder and hospital admissions: findings from a large, population cohort study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(10): e018539. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018539.
Huh J, Goebert D, Takeshita J, Lu BY, Kang M. Treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a comprehensive review of the literature for psychopharmacologic alternatives to newer antidepressants and benzodiazepines. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2011;13(2):PCC.08r00709. https://doi.org/10.4088/pcc.08r00709blu.
Culpepper L. Impact of anxious symptoms and comorbid anxiety disorders on functional impairment in depressed patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(5): e604. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.14076tx1c.
Strawn JR, Geracioti L, Rajdev N, Clemenza K, Levine A. Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19(10):1057–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2018.1491966.
Gaspersz R, Nawijn L, Lamers F, Penninx B. Patients with anxious depression: overview of prevalence, pathophysiology and impact on course and treatment outcome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2018;31(1):17–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0000000000000376.
Murray CJ. Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):429–45.
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30925-9.
Global Health Data Exchange. GBD results tool. 2020. http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool. Accessed 14 December 2020.
US Burden of Disease Collaborators. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA. 2013;310(6):591–608. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.13805.
Acknowledgements
Funding
This supplement has been sponsored by Servier, France. This funding includes payment of the journal’s Rapid Service Fee and Open Access Fee.
Medical Writing Assistance
We would like to thank Richard Crampton of Springer Healthcare Communications, who wrote the first draft of this article. Funding for this medical writing assistance was provided by Servier.
Authorship
All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.
Authors’ Contributions
Prof Goodwin and Dr Stein each prepared one of the lectures on which this editorial is based, and both authors read and revised all drafts of this editorial and approved the final draft for submission.
Prior Presentation
This editorial and the accompanying articles in this supplement are based on presentations made by the authors at a Servier-funded virtual symposium titled “GAD and Depression: Contemporary Treatment Approaches” as part of the Industry Science Exchange sessions that took place at the European College of Neuropsycopharmacology 33rd Congress in September 2020.
Disclosures
Guy M. Goodwin is a NIHR Emeritus Senior Investigator and Medical Director at P1vital products, holds shares in P1vital and P1vital products, has served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker in the last 3 years for Beckley Psytech, Clerkenwell Health, Compass pathways, Evapharma, Janssen, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis, Ocean Neuroscience, P1Vital, Sage, and Servier, and has received an honorarium from Servier for the presentation on which this publication is based. Dan J. Stein has received research grants and/or consultancy honoraria from Abbott, ABMRF/The Foundation for Alcohol Research, AstraZeneca, Biocodex, Eli-Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, National Responsible Gambling Foundation, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Roche, Servier, Solvay, Sumitomo, Sun, Takeda, Tikvah and Wyeth, and has received research grants and/or consultancy honoraria in the last 3 years from Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, Servier and Takeda. This includes an honorarium from Servier for the presentation on which this publication is based. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
This editorial is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Goodwin, G.M., Stein, D.J. Generalised Anxiety Disorder and Depression: Contemporary Treatment Approaches. Adv Ther 38 (Suppl 2), 45–51 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01859-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01859-8