Abstract
The foremost aim of the channel irrigation is a suitable choice of preparation and decision-making flexibles. These flexibles are the channel length, current degree to the channel and cutoff period. These flexibles are calculated through optimization depending on diminishing the overall irrigation cost and maximizing the application competence of irrigation. The goal meaning has been shaped depending on costs of the water, employee and head channel and channel excavation. So, in the impartial purpose, an equation should be measured for calculating the water advance period in an indistinct and detailed way. Subsequently, none of the careful approaches applied for advance channel irrigation such as zero inactivity calculate the advance time overtly; therefore, in this investigation the Valiantzas equation has been applied which has been assumed from the consequences of the zero inertia prototypical. In the impartial purpose, in addition to the preparation flexibles, soil features, channel and net irrigation condition have been included. So, the project variables and irrigation competence can be calculated for each kind of soil and exact herbal. An example of this project has been existed in this investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Concerning the arid circumstances in Iran and un-usability of forced irrigation in all circumstances, a rise in the competence of superficial irrigation is vital. Optimum development of superficial irrigation approaches is one of the operative stages to accomplish this determination. Commonly, the superficial irrigation development approaches or systems for computation of the advance period (a significant component in development) can be considered into the subsequent groups: Group one is the modest approaches such as the SCS technique. Reddy and Clyma (1981) and Reddy and Apolayo (1991) used the SCS equation for optimum development of channels and measured the entire irrigation expenditure as the goal meaning. But, findings displayed that this technique led to significant errors in calculating the progressive period (Shayannejad et al. 2022; Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. 2017a; Ostad-Ali-Askari and Shayannejad 2020, 2021a, b; Vanani et al. 2017; Valiantzas 2001a; Banti et al. 2011). Group 2 is the arithmetical approaches such as the kinematic wave, zero inertia and dynamic wave mockups. These approaches are compound and similarly cannot calculate the advance period obviously (Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. 2017b; Fatahi Nafchi et al. 2021a, b, 2022a, b; Ostad-Ali-Askari 2022; Abdollahi et al. 2021; Talebmorad et al. 2020, 2021; Salehi-Hafshejani et al. 2019; Strelkoff and Katopodes 1977). Strelkoff and Katopodes (1977) and Elliott et al. (1982) applied the zero inertia mockups for calculating the advance period. The optimal circumstances and alternate-furrow fertigation powerfully decrease water and nitrate losses compared with conservative channel irrigation. The simulation–optimization prototypical is a valuable instrument for mitigation of the ecological impression of channel irrigation (Ebrahimian et al. 2013a, b; Pais et al. 2010). Ostad-Ali-Askari and Shayannejad (2015a, b) stated that input flexibles of a precise prototypical model were active parameters on profound filtration, for example, bed gradient, inflow degree and coefficients of soil infiltration. These flexibles were measured in 16 ranches of Zayandehrood basin. Comparison of assessed and measured deep filtration displayed that the error of prototypical was 1.73%. Gonc et al. (2011) stated that assuming water and shortage irrigation were normally problematic in financial terms; thus, it is essential to support the agriculturalists. The water current of superficial irrigation exhibits a main characteristic which is the presence of wet-dry border (Eslamian et al. 2018a, b; Derakhshannia et al. 2020; Pirnazar et al. 2018; Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. 2018a, b, 2019, 2020; Ostad-Ali-Askari and Shayannejad 2021c; Golian et al. 2020; Albert et al. 2011; Hosseini et al. 2014). In mathematical simulation, owing to the anti-diffusion distinctive of the coarseness term of the Saint–Venant equations, wet-dry border of the superficial current can impact the constancy of momentum preservation equation and decrease the simulation correctness of reiterative coupled samples (Javadinejad et al. 2018, 2019a, b, 2021; Dong et al. 2013; Fenoglio et al. 2007). Group 3 is the volume balance model. In this prototypical model, the superficial and subsurface form features during the advance step are presumed to be constant. Similarly, this prototypical model depends on the normal depth. Walker and Skogerboe (1987) stated that the volume balance model is more suitable for advance calculation. Operators of volume balance model need to be conscious that indeterminate superficial volume designs can lead to possibly large volume balance errors. Therefore, these consequences require to be interpreted sensibly (Bautista et al. 2012). None of the above-declared approaches appears suitable for the development of the optimum channel irrigation, since these approaches cannot calculate the advance time obviously and exactly (Raeisi-Vanani et al. 2015). Optimum development requires an accurate equation for obvious calculation of the advance time and applying in the goal function (Soltani-Todeshki et al. 2015). In this article, the overall essential cost for once irrigation including the workforce cost, water, channels and ditch excavation has been measured as the goal meaning which should be minimized. Noticeably, the workforce cost is a function of the irrigation time which is contingent on the advance period. In this investigation, the equation was recommended by Valiantzas (2001b) applied for the calculation of the advance time. This is an obvious equation for the calculation of the advance time. Valiantzas equation gained depends on the consequences of the zero inertia prototypical with high accuracy.
Methodology
In prototypical expansion for irrigation of a part of quantified farm land through the channel, it must be separated into a number of irrigation sets (Ns). Each irrigation segment comprises a number of channels which are concomitantly irrigated. The plan of irrigation sets for better comprehends of symbols and the technique of this article are shown in Fig. 1.
where Nsl is the total number of irrigation sets in the way of channels; Nsw is the total number of irrigation sets in the way of vertical to channels; Lf is the length of the ranch in meters (in the way of channels); Wf is the width of the ranch in meters (in the way of vertical channels); Q0 is the influx current degree to each channel (m3/min); Qt is the total obtainable current degree (m3/min); L is the length of each channel (m); Nfs is the number of channels/each irrigation set; and W is the width of each channel (m). Concerning Fig. 1, Eqs. 1–4 can be obtained as follows:
Substituting Eqs. 1, 2 and 3 in Eq. 4, Eq. 5 can be obtained:
Costs of the channel irrigation can be separated into four portions that are explicated in the following.
Water cost
Water cost is calculated by increasing the compulsory water volume and the value of unit volume of water (m3) as Eq. 6:
where Ctw is the cost of the compulsory water for one time irrigation of the whole farmhouse (Rials); Cw is the price of water volume unit (Rials/m3); and Tco is the cutoff time (min). By substituting Eq. 5 and Eq. 6, Eq. 7 can be obtained:
Workforce cost
This cost is attained by increasing the compulsory period for irrigating the whole farm and the employees cost in the unit of time given in Eq. 8:
where Ctl is the workforce compulsory expenditure for one time irrigation of the whole homestead (Rials) and C1 is the workforce cost for unit of time (Rials/min). By substituting Eq. 5 and Eq. 8, Eq. 9 can be obtained:
Furrow digging cost
The channel excavating cost is obtained by increasing the total length of channels and the excavation cost of their length unit which concerns the whole of increasing season. For one time irrigation, it must separate to the number of irrigation proceedings as Eq. 10:
where Ctf is the cost of channel digging for one time irrigation of the entire ranch (Rials), Cf is the cost of excavating channel length unit (Rials/m) and Ni is the number of irrigation proceedings throughout the rising season. The above-mentioned cost is not a purpose of advance flexibles such as the influx degree and the channel length. So, its value is persistent and is not significant in the scheming of the optimization and only involves in calculating the total of the costs.
Cost of digging the head ditch
According to Fig. 1, for numerous irrigation sets, a head ditch is excavated at end of upriver of channels. Cost of these channels is calculated by increasing their total length to the excavation cost of length unit. Comparable to the preceding piece, this cost should be separated by the number of irrigation procedures given in Eq. 11:
where Ctd is the cost of excavating the irrigation rivers for one time irrigation of the whole farm (Rials) and Cd is the disbursement of excavating the length unit of stream (Rials/m). By substituting Eq. 1 and Eq. 11, Eq. 12 can be attained:
Total cost for one time irrigating is calculated with Eq. 13:
where Ct is the total irrigation cost for one time irrigation of the farm (Rials). An equation comparable to Eq. 13 was planned by Valiantzas (2001a, b). Equation 13 designates that the total cost is contingent on three flexibles including Q0, Tco and L. Tco can be written as a function of the 2 other flexibles. So, Eq. 14 can be obtained:
where Tl is the advance time (min) and Tr is the consumption chance time (min). To calculate Tr, any penetration equation can be applied. For the Kostiakov equation, calculation is as follows (Eqs. 15 and 16):
where Z is the depth of the infiltrated water (m), T is the filtration time (min), Zr is the net irrigation condition (m) and K and α are the permeation coefficients of the Kostiakov equation. To calculate T1, an obvious and detailed equation should be applied. So, optimization of Eq. 13 can be completed. For this determination, Eq. 17 that was planned by Valiantzas (2001a, b) is applied:
where A0 is the part of cross segment at the end of upriver of the channel (m2) and σz is the subsurface current form feature. This quantity is calculated from Eq. 18:
A0 value is calculated using the Manning equation, and the channel form coefficients are calculated using Eq. 19:
where N is the Manning’s coarseness coefficient, S0 is the channel bed gradient (m/m) and ρ1 and ρ2 are the channel form factors. These factors, regarding the Manning equation, are calculated as Eq. 20:
where A is the current cross segment (m2) and R is the hydraulic radius (m). Finally, by substituting Eqs. 4, 16 and 17 in Eq. 13, Eq. 21 can be obtained, where Ct is a function of the two flexibles of Q0 and L0. Equation 21 can be written as follows:
To calculate these two flexibles, Eq. 21 should be improved.
Findings and discussion
The purpose of applying the optimization technique in channel project is initially variation of Eq. 21 that does not find the flexibles overtly. Furthermore, the optimization technique delivers the opportunity for retaining the numerical solution methods using the processer. The technique for applying this technique is clarified in the following. An optimization technique includes the subsequent four portions:
-
I.
Choice flexibles: These flexibles are unidentified and should be quantified by the optimization.
-
II.
Choice flexibles of the optimization prototypical in the investigation are Q0 and L.
-
III.
Parameters: These flexibles are recognized. These parameters are all the flexibles remaining in Eq. 21, excluding the choice ones. Equation 21 is united with Eqs. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19 that have many recognized flexibles.
-
IV.
Goal function: Eq. 21 displays the association among the enhanced quantities with the choice-pleasing flexibles in the procedure of a precise purpose.
-
V.
Boundaries: Some of the optimization approaches are controlled. Thus, the choice-captivating flexibles call limitations. In this investigation, the subsequent limitations are applied for the choice-taking flexibles:
$$L > 0, Q_{0} \le Q_{{{\text{max}}}}$$
In these circumstances, Qmax is the maximum influx rate to the channel which does not cause corrosion. SCS has been proposed in Eq. 22 for calculating it (m3/min):
Applying the above four portions, optimization is achieved in the subsequent stages:
-
1.
Main standards are expected for the result flexibles:
\(X_{1} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {Q_{0}^{1} } \\ {L^{1} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\).
-
2.
An assuming way of \(S_{1} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 0 \\ 1 \\ \end{array} } \right]\) is measured whose original standards for the result flexibles are assessed as follows:
\(X_{2} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {Q_{0}^{2} } \\ {L^{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\) = \(X_{1} + \lambda_{1} \cdot S_{1}\) (23).
-
3.
Over employing X2 in the goal meaning and equal its imitative to zero, λ1 is projected and by substituting it in Eq. 23, X2 value is calculated.
-
4.
X3 value is calculated by Eq. 24:
$$X_{3} = 2X_{2} - X_{1}$$(24) -
5.
Providing f (X3) < f (X2), the aforementioned steps are recurrent. Then, the S1 way should be altered as follows:
$$S_{1} = X_{2} - X_{1}$$(25) -
6.
Calculations are repeated with the novel S1 until the smallest point of the goal meaning is accomplished. All the declared calculations are achieved using LINGO, and lastly, L and Q values and the least costs are calculated. Then, applying Eq. 14 and with the subsequent calculation, the irrigation competence can be calculated:
$$E_{{\text{a}}} = \frac{{Z_{{\text{r}}} \cdot W \cdot L}}{{Q_{{\text{o}}} \cdot T_{{{\text{co}}}} }} \times 100$$(26)
In the above calculation, E is the irrigation competence fraction. According to Eq. 13 along with minimization of C1, Qo. Tco, irrigation competence in Eq. 26, will be maximized. Momentarily, the technique that was clarified in this paper led to scheming of influx degree to the channel, channel distance, irrigation period (period) and irrigation competence depending on expenditure minimization and irrigation competence enlargement. In the other words, optimum channel strategy has been gained. For instance, the subsequent statistics for channel enhanced preparation have been introduced into the optimization:
Zr = 0.1 m, Qt = 9.48 m3/min, 0.0016, a = 0.762, Ni = 7, n = 0.04, S0 = 0.001, 1 ρ = 0.3269, 2 ρ = 2.734, Wf = 100 m, Lf = 1000 m, C1 = 60 Rials/min, Cf = 100 Rials/m, Cd = 200 Rials/m, Cw = 20 Rials/m3.
Consequences of the optimizations prototypical are given as follows:
L = 100 m, Q0 = 0.0498 m3/min, Tco = 312 min, Ea = 48.7% and Ct = 2,450,000 Rials.
Conclusion
In the existing education, the least irrigation cost and extreme irrigation competence were obtained for the influx degree of 0.0498 (m3/min) and length of 100 (m) for the channel. So, in the goal meaning, a calculation should be measured for calculating the water advance period in a clear and detailed way. Since none of the meticulous approaches applied for advance channel irrigation like zero inertia calculate the advance time plainly, consequently in this investigation the Valiantzas calculation has been applied which has been assumed from the consequences of the zero inertia prototypical. In the goal purpose, in addition to the preparation flexibles, soil features, furrow and net irrigation condition have been included. So, the project flexibles and irrigation competence can be calculated for each kind of soil and precise herbal. An example of this project has been offered in this education. According to the above current degree, by increasing or declining the channel length, the irrigation competence declines and its cost rises. The gradient of cost and irrigation changes relative to the channel length has optimum facts that are exposed in Fig. 2. Correspondingly, the gradient of cost and irrigation productivity qualified to influx degree can be strained for a channel in the length of 100 m. In this circumstance, by increasing or diminishing the influx degree, irrigation cost rises and irrigation competence declines. According to the conclusions, a channel length of 190 m is attained which is meaningfully dissimilar to the present-day study conclusions. In the stated tables, the channel length is a purpose of depth of irrigation water and bed gradient of the channel and soil quality. Other channel properties have not been measured. According to Fig. 2, irrigation competence is 32%, for a channel length of 190 m. The succeeding explanations endorse: The optimum channel project bends can be drawn for diversity of soils and channels for numerous standards of net irrigation necessities. The problem of low irrigation can be simply implanted into this technique. For this determination, it is expected that filtration at the end of the channel is less than the net irrigation condition.
Data availability
Some or all data, models or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Abdollahi S, Madadi M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2021) Monitoring and investigating dust phenomenon on using remote sensing science geographical information system and statistical methods. Appl Water Sci 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01419-z
Banti M, Zissis Th, Anastasiadou-Partheniou E (2011) Furrow irrigation advance simulation using a surface–subsurface interaction model. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(5):304–314
Bautista E, Strelkoff T, Clemmens AJ (2012) Improved surface volume estimates for surface irrigation volume-balance calculations. J Irrig Drain Eng 138(8):715–726
Booher LJ (1974) Surface irrigation. Rome: food and agricultural organization of the United Nations. FAO agricultural development paper no. 95, pp 160
Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff T (2011) Zero-inertial recession for kinematic-wave model. J Irrig Drain Eng 137(4):263–266
Derakhshannia M, Dalvand S, Asakereh B, Askari KOA (2020) Corrosion and deposition in Karoon River Iran based on hydrometric stations. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 10(4):334. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2020.108264
Dong Q, Xu D, Zhang Sh, Bai M, Li Y (2013) A hybrid coupled model of surface and subsurface flow for surface irrigation. J Hydrol 500:62–74
Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Parsinejad M, Playan E, Abbasi F, Navabian M, Lattore B (2013a) Optimum design of alternate and conventional furrow fertigation to minimize nitrate loss. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(11):911–921
Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Parsinejad M, Playan E, Abbasi F, Navabian M (2013b) Simulation of 1D surface and 2D subsurface water flow and nitrate transport in alternate and conventional furrow fertigation. Irrig Sci 31(3):301–316
Elliott RL, Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (1982) Zero-inertia modeling of furrow irrigation advance. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 108(1R3):179–195
Eslamian S et al (2018a) Saturation. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_251-1
Eslamian S et al (2018b) Water. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_295-1
Fatahi Nafchi R, Yaghoobi P, Reaisi Vanani H, Ostad‑Ali‑Askari K, Nouri J, Maghsoudlou B (2021a) Eco-hydrologic stability zonation of dams and power plants using the combined models of SMCE and CEQUALW2. Appl Water Sci 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01427-z
Fatahi Nafchi R, Samadi-Boroujeni H, Vanani HR, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Brojeni MK (2021b) Laboratory investigation on erosion threshold shear stress of cohesive sediment in Karkheh Dam. Environ Earth Sci 80(19). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09984-x
Fattahi Nafchi R, Raeisi Vanani H, Noori Pashaee K, Samadi Brojeni H, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022a) Investigation on the effect of inclined crest step pool on scouring protection in erodible river beds. Natural Hazards 110(3):1495–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04999-w
Fatahi Nafchi R, Yaghoobi P, Vanani HR, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Nouri J, Maghsoudlou B (2022b) Correction to: Eco-hydrologic stability zonation of dams and power plants using the combined models of SMCE and CEQUALW2. Appl Water Sci 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01563-6
Fenoglio S, Bo T, Cucco M, Malacarne G (2007) Response of benthic invertebrate assemblages to varying drought conditions in the Po river. Ital J Zool 74(2):191–201
Golian M, Katibeh H, Singh VP, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Rostami HT (2020) Prediction of tunnelling impact on flow rates of adjacent extraction water wells. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 53(2):236–251. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2019-055
Gonc JM, Muga AP, Horst MG, Pereira LS (2011) Furrow irrigation design with multicriteria analysis. Biosyst Eng 109(4):266–275
Hafshejani SS, Shayannejad M, Broujeni HS, Zarraty AR, Soltani B, Esfahani EM, Hamedani MH, Eslamian S, Askari KOA (2019) Determination of the height of the vertical filter for heterogeneous Earth dams with vertical clay core. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 9(3):221. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2019.102315
Hosseini SH, Khaleghi MR (2014) An assessment of runoff and sediment generation in fine-grained formations (Neocene’s units) under rainfall simulator. Int Bull Water Resour Develop 2(4):XXVIII–XL
Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Mirramazani SM, Zadeh LA, Samimi M (2018) Embankments. In: Bobrowsky P, Marker B (eds) Encyclopedia of engineering geology. Encyclopedia of earth sciences series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12127-7_105-1
Javadinejad S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Jafary F (2019a) Using simulation model to determine the regulation and to optimize the quantity of chlorine injection in water distribution networks. Model Earth Syst Environ 5(3):1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00587-x
Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2019b) Investigation of monthly and seasonal changes of methane gas with respect to climate change using satellite data. Appl Water Sci 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1067-9
Javadinejad S, Eslamian S, Askari KOA (2021) The analysis of the most important climatic parameters affecting performance of crop variability in a changing climate. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2021.112651
Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Management of risks substances and sustainable development. Appl Water Sci 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01562-7
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2015a) Presenting a mathematical model for estimating the deep percolation due to irrigation. Int J Hydraul Eng 4(1):17–21
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2015b) Usage of rockfill dams in the HEC-RAS software for the purpose of controlling floods. Am J Fluid Dyn 5(1):23–29
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2020) Impermanent changes investigation of shape factors of the volumetric balance model for water development in surface irrigation. Model Earth Syst Environ 6(3):1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00771-4
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2021a) Subsurface drain spacing in the unsteady conditions by HYDRUS-3D and artificial neural networks. Arab J Geosci 14(18). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08336-0
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2021b) Computation of subsurface drain spacing in the unsteady conditions using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Appl Water Sci 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01356-3
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2021c) Quantity and quality modelling of groundwater to manage water resources in Isfahan-Borkhar Aquifer. Environ Develop Sustain 23(11):15943–15959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01323-1
Ostad-Ali-Askari et al. (2017a) Deficit irrigation: optimization models. In: Management of drought and water scarcity. Handbook of drought and water scarcity, Vol 3, 1st Edn. Taylor & Francis Publisher, Imprint: CRC Press, pp 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315226774
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M, Ghorbanizadeh-Kharazi H (2017b) Artificial neural network for modeling nitrate pollution of groundwater in marginal area of Zayandeh-rood River Isfahan Iran. KSCE J Civil Eng 21(1):134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-016-0572-8
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M, Eslamian S, Navabpour B (2018a) Comparison of solutions of Saint-Venant equations by characteristics and finite difference methods for unsteady flow analysis in open channel. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 8(3):229. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2018.093569
Ostad-Ali-Askar K, Su R, Liu L (2018b) Water resources and climate change. J Water Climate Change 9(2):239–239. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.999
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Ghorbanizadeh Kharazi H, Shayannejad M, Zareian MJ (2019) Effect of management strategies on reducing negative impacts of climate change on water resources of the Isfahan-Borkhar aquifer using MODFLOW. River Res Appl 35(6):611–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3463
Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Ghorbanizadeh Kharazi H, Shayannejad M, Zareian MJ (2020) Effect of climate change on precipitation patterns in an arid region using GCM Models: case study of Isfahan-Borkhar Plain. Natural Hazards Rev 21(2):04020006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000367
Pais MS, Ferreira JC, Teixeira MB, Yamanaka K, Carrijo GA (2010) Cost optimization of a localized irrigation system using genetic algorithms. International conference on intelligent data engineering and automated learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 29–36
Pirnazar M, Hasheminasab H, Karimi AZ, Askari KOA, Ghasemi Z, Hamedani MH, Esfahani EM, Eslamian S (2018) The evaluation of the usage of the fuzzy algorithms in increasing the accuracy of the extracted land use maps. Int Global Environ Issues 17(4):307. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2018.095063
Raeisi-Vanani H, Soltani Todeshki AR, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M (2015) The effect of heterogeneity due to inappropriate tillage on water advance and recession in furrow irrigation. J Agric Sci 7(6):127–136
Reddy JM, Apolayo HM (1991) Sensitivity of furrow irrigation system cost and design variables. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 117(2):201–219
Reddy JM, Clyma W (1981) Optimal design of furrow irrigation system. Trans ASAE 24(3):617–623. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34310
Shayannejad M, Ghobadi M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2022) Modeling of surface flow and infiltration during surface irrigation advance based on numerical solution of saint–venant equations using Preissmann’s Scheme. Pure Appl Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-02962-9
Soltani-Todeshki AR, Raeisi-Vanani H, Shayannejad M, Ostad-Ali-Askari K (2015) Effects of magnetized municipal effluent on some chemical properties of soil in furrow irrigation. Int J Agri Crop Sci 8(3):482–489
Strelkoff T, Katopodes ND (1977) Border-irrigation hydraulics with zero inertia. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 103(3):325–342
Talebmorad H, Ahmadnejad A, Eslamian S, Askari KOA, Singh VP (2020) Evaluation of uncertainty in evapotranspiration values by FAO56-Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves-Samani methods. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 10(2):135. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2020.106481
Talebmorad H, Koupai JA, Eslamian S, Mousavi SF, Akhavan S, Askari KOA, Singh VP (2021) Evaluation of the impact of climate change on reference crop evapotranspiration in Hamedan-Bahar plain. Int J Hydrol Sci Technol 11(3):333. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2021.114554
Valiantzas JD (2001a) Optimal furrow design. I: time of advance equation. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 127(4):201–208
Valiantzas JD (2001b) Optimal furrow design. II: explicit calculation of design variables. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 127(4):209–215. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2001)127:4(209)
Vanani HR, Shayannejad M, Soltani Tudeshki AR, Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Eslamian S, Mohri-Esfahani E, Haeri-Hamedani M, Jabbari H (2017) Development of a new method for determination of infiltration coefficients in furrow irrigation with natural non-uniformity of slope. Sust Water Res Manag 3(2):163–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0091-x
Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (1987) Surface irrigation theory and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, New Jersey
Funding
Funding information is not applicable. No funding was received. No grants were received.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors designed the study, collected the data, wrote the manuscript and revised it.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
All authors designed the study, collected the data, wrote the manuscript and revised it.
Consent to publish
All authors agree to publish this manuscript. There is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
In the present study, ethical aspect was approved by Department of Water Engineering, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 8415683111, Iran.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ostad-Ali-Askari, K. Developing an optimal design model of furrow irrigation based on the minimum cost and maximum irrigation efficiency. Appl Water Sci 12, 144 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01646-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01646-y