Abstract
In utero sensory stimuli and interaction with the environment strongly influence early phases of fetal and infant development. Extremely premature infants are subjected to noxious procedures and routine monitoring, in addition to exposure to excessive light and noise, which disturb the natural sleep cycle and induce stress. Non-invasive ventilation, measures to prevent sepsis, and human milk feeding improve short-term and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature infants. To preserve brain function, and to improve quality of life and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, the focus now is on the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) environment and its impact on the infant during hospital stay. The objectives of this write-up are to understand the effects of environmental factors, including lighting and noise in the NICU, on sensory development of the infant, the need to decrease parental and caregiver stress, and to review existing literature, local policies and recommendations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blackburn S. Environmental impact of the NICU on developmental outcomes. J Pediatr Nurs. 1998;13:279–89.
Hofer MA. Early social relationships: a psychobiologist’s view. Child Dev. 1987;58:633–47.
Meaney MJ. Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1161–92.
Sehgal A, Stack J. Developmentally supportive care and NIDCAP. Indian J Pediatr. 2006;73:1007–10.
Pickler RH, McGrath JM, Reyna BA, McCain N, Lewis M, Cone S, et al. A model of neurodevelopmental risk and protection for preterm infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2010;24:356–65.
Hall JW, 3rd. Development of the ear and hearing. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S12–20.
Lickliter R. Atypical perinatal sensory stimulation and early perceptual development: Insights from developmental psychobiology. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S45–54.
Graven SN. Sound and the developing infant in the NICU: Conclusions and recommendations for care. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S88–93.
Graven SN, Browne JV. Auditory Development in the Fetus and Infant. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8:187–93.
Gerhardt KJ, Abrams RM. Fetal exposures to sound and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S21–30.
Miller CL, Byrne JM. Psychophysiologic and behavioral response to auditory stimuli in the newborn. Infant Behav Dev. 1983;6:369–89.
White RD, Smith JA, Shepley MM, Committee to Establish Recommended Standards for Newborn ICUD. Recommended Standards for Newborn ICU Design, eighth edition. J Perinatol. 2013;33:S2–16.
Bremmer P, Byers JF, Kiehl E. Noise and the premature infant: physiological effects and practice implications. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32:447–54.
Moon CM, Fifer WP. Evidence of transnatal auditory learning. J Perinatol. 2000;20:S37–44.
Graven S. Sleep and brain development. Clin Perinatol. 2007;33:693–706.
Philbin MK, Gray L. Changing levels of quiet in an intensive care nursery. J Perinatol. 2002;22:455–60.
Abou Turk C, Williams AL, Lasky RE. A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care. J Perinatol. 2009;29:358–63.
Duran R, Ciftdemir NA, Ozbek UV, Berberoglu U, Durankus F, Sut N, et al. The effects of noise reduction by earmuffs on the physiologic and behavioral responses in very low birth weight preterm infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:1490–3.
Graven SN, Browne JV. Visual development in the human fetus, infant, and young child. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8:194–201.
Roy MS, Caramelli C, Orquin J, Uleckas J, Hardy P, Chemtob S. Effects of early reduced light exposure on central visual development in preterm infants. Acta Pediatr. 1999;88:459–61.
Reynolds JD, Hardy RJ, Kennedy KA, Spencer R, van Heuven WA, Fielder AR. Lack of efficacy of light reduction in preventing retinopathy of prematurity. Light Reduction in Retinopathy of Prematurity (LIGHT-ROP) Cooperative Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1572–6.
Jorge EC, Jorge EN, El Dib RP. Early light reduction for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;8:CD000122.
Seron-Ferre M, Torres-Farfan C, Forcelledo ML, Valenzuela GJ. The development of circadian rhythms in the fetus and neonate. Semin Perinatol. 2001;25:363–70.
Begum E, Bonno M, Obata M, Yamamoto H, Kawai M, Komada Y. Emergence of physiological rhythmicity in term and preterm neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Circadian Rhythms. 2006;4:11.
Morag I, Ohlsson A. Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:Cd006982.
Feldman R, Weller A, Leckman JF, Kuint J, Eidelman AI. The nature of the mother’s tie to her infant: Maternal bonding under conditions of proximity, separation, and potential loss. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40:929–39.
Turan T, Basbakkal Z, Ozbek S. Effect of nursing interventions on stressors of parents of premature infants in neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17:2856–66.
Preyde M, Ardal F. Effectiveness of a parent “buddy” program for mothers of very preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Can Med Assoc J. 2003;168:969–73.
O’Brien K, Bracht M, Robson K, Ye XY, Mirea L, Cruz M, et al. Evaluation of the family integrated care model of neonatal intensive care: A cluster randomized controlled trial in Canada and Australia. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15:210.
Verma A, Maria A, Pandey RM, Hans C, Verma A, Sherwani F. Family-centered care to complement care of sick newborns: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54:455–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Venkataraman, R., Kamaluddeen, M., Amin, H. et al. Is Less Noise, Light and Parental/Caregiver Stress in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Better for Neonates?. Indian Pediatr 55, 17–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1220-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1220-9