Abstract
From harvesting to consumption of the faba bean (Vicia faba), different plant residues such as stems, leaves, pods, and seed husks remain as by-products. The harvest residues constitute about 50% (w/w) of the whole aboveground biomass, while the empty pods and the seed husks account for 11% and 6% (w/w) on average, respectively. Due to the environmental and dietary benefits, the global production of faba beans is most likely to increase in the future. Concomitantly, the amounts of by-products will rise as well. So far, mainly the harvest residues have been widely studied, whereas the pods and husks have received less consideration. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an overview of the composition of the faba bean plant residues and to illustrate their potential of being used as feedstock in food, feed, or even non-food applications. This literature survey clearly reveals that all the residual materials of faba beans contain valuable compounds and might be suitable for a multitude of different applications. The residual material should thus not be disposed of but further valorized in order to exploit the full potential of the biomass.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) is a versatile legume cultivated all over the world. V. faba crops are classified into three main varieties according to their seed size: (1) V. faba major with large seeds (also commonly called broad bean), (2) V. faba equina with medium seeds, and (3) V. faba minor with small seeds (also commonly called tick bean, field bean, or horse bean) [1, 2].
The annual global production of faba beans is more than 5.5 million tons, with China, Ethiopia, Egypt, UK, and Australia being the main producers [3]. Cultivation of grain legumes in the European Union and especially Germany is currently negligible. About 1.4% of the German arable land and about 2.1% of the European Union are covered by grain legumes with around 30% being faba beans [4]. In recent years, however, there has been an upward trend in faba bean production due to associated environmental benefits and a kind of revival in human nutrition suggesting the consumption of more plant proteins and especially originating from legumes.
Like all legume genera, symbiosis with Rhizobia bacteria enables faba beans to fix atmospheric nitrogen, which is then used for faba bean metabolism. Parts of nitrogen are also released to the soil. The inclusion of legumes in farming systems can contribute to mitigating climate change as they reduce greenhouse gas emissions and play a key role in soil carbon sequestration [5]. Faba beans also contribute to the diversification of agroecosystems, either when being used in crop rotations or by using intercropping systems. Both increase biodiversity as they provide feed to pollinators and other beneficial insects [6].
With regard to nutrient composition, faba beans are rich in proteins, starch, dietary fibres, and have low fat contents (Table 1). They are a good source of dietary minerals and trace elements such as potassium, phosphorus, iron, and zinc [7] and vitamins such as folic acid (vitamin B9) and vitamin K [8]. They also contain considerable amounts of bioactive compounds such as phenolic compounds which are known for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-diabetic properties [9]. However, faba beans also contain various substances such as tannins, lectins, phytates, saponins, oligosaccharides, and protease inhibitors [10] that are regarded as anti-nutrients that may limit the use of faba beans, especially in animal nutrition. The chemical composition strongly depends on the cultivar [11,12,13,14], as well as on ecophysiological factors [12, 13] and management conditions [14, 15].
Faba beans are widely used for human consumption and animal nutrition [1]. Human consumption of faba beans in Northern Europe has been reported as far back as the Viking Age (700–1050 CE) [17]. The oldest seeds of faba beans were found in the late tenth millennium BP in north-west Syria [18], suggesting that the faba bean has been used for a much longer time. Faba beans can be consumed either fresh (raw or as a vegetable) or in dry form in a variety of foods [19]. Due to their high protein content, they can be included in the diets of ruminants, pigs, and poultry to a certain level, depending on the amount of anti-nutrients [1, 7].
Due to the environmental and dietary benefits, the global production of faba beans is most likely to increase. Simultaneously with increasing amounts of produced beans, the amounts of produced by-products will increase as well. From harvesting to consumption of the faba beans, several by-products such as stalks, leaves, pods, and seed husks occur, which are currently underutilized. This review provides an overview of the quantification and composition of by-products present and their potential use in food, feed, or non-food applications.
2 By-product generation—harvesting and processing residues
Along the growing, the harvesting, and the processing of faba beans, different by-products are occurring (Fig. 1). The amount of by-products in faba bean processing depends on the maturity level. Faba beans can be harvested at a vegetative state when pods and seeds are fresh and green or at full maturity when pods dry out with only the seeds being of interest [9]. The beans are predominantly harvested in the dry state. In some production areas, for example, in Jordan [20], and in small-scale household gardening [21], the harvesting of fresh beans dominates.
When the faba bean is harvested in the dry state, the grains are removed from the pods by threshing. Large quantities of biomass residues, comprising stalks, leaves, and dried pods, remain in the field afterwards. In China alone, 4 million tons of faba bean stalks accumulate annually [22]. The amount of total residual biomass can be derived from the harvest index, which is an agricultural indicator that designates the ratio of the grain yield to the total aboveground biomass yield. The harvest index of faba beans has been measured in a large number of studies and ranges mostly from 40 to 60% (w/w, based on dry matter, DM) [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. This implies that on average, around 40 to 60% (w/w) of the aboveground biomass remains unused and as residues in the field.
When the faba bean is harvested in the fresh state, the whole pods including the seeds are removed either manually or mechanically. Accordingly, less harvest residues remain in the field. The pods constitute about 20% (w/w, based on dry matter) of the harvest residues [34, 35]. The freshly harvested pods may be sold intact, but most commonly the grains are also released from the pods and are sold fresh, frozen, or canned [36]. These empty pods remain as residual material and constitute about 70–75% (w/w) of the fresh matter of the whole pod yield [36,37,38,39,40]. However, when only the dry mass of the fractions is considered, the seeds constitute about 80% (w/w) of the dry pod weight, while the empty pods only account for 20% (w/w) [35, 41, 42].
Both fresh and dried faba beans are generally consumed or further processed after the removal of the seed husk, in order to improve the nutritional value [43]. The husks constitute approximately 10–15% (w/w) of the seed DM [16, 19, 37, 44,45,46]. Dehulling of dry beans is usually done by industrial or small-scale milling [47]. Apart from the husks, other by-products such as broken grains, germs, and powder occur [47].
Figure 2 gives an overview of the mass fractions of the different residues and the final dehulled grains in relation to the total aboveground biomass. The calculation is based on mean values from the abovementioned references. It is apparent that the plant parts remaining in the field account for the majority of the residues, while the pods and husks make up smaller mass fractions. Besides, empty pods and husks might not always be generated from the processing. In the following sections, the use of harvest residues (leaves and straw) and process residues (pods and husks) is discussed.
3 Harvest residues—leaves and straw
The composition of faba bean harvest residues was determined in a large number of studies, and an overview of the proximate composition is given in Table 2. The composition may vary widely depending on cultivar [33, 34], cultivation conditions [30, 38], and the proportions of stems, leaves, and pods [37]. Faba bean harvest residues are very rich in fibres. On average, the major cell wall components hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin together account for more than 60% (w/w) and, thus, constitute the main part of the plant residues. Cellulose makes up 40% (w/w), while hemicellulose and lignin are mostly below 15% (w/w). However, the straws studied showed a wide range in cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content. The average crude protein content of the straw is about 8% (w/w), ranging from 4 to 19% (w/w). While stems and pods have low protein contents, leaves can contain up to 35% (w/w) [48]. The ash content is mostly below 10% (w/w) with the leaves having a higher percentage than the stems [34]. The protein and ash contents are in the range of other legume straws but rather high compared to cereal straws [49, 50]. Faba bean residues contain considerable amount of nitrogen, potassium, and calcium (mostly above 1%, w/w) and smaller amounts of phosphorus, sodium, and magnesium (mostly below 0.5%, w/w).
3.1 Harvest residues—food use
The use of faba bean plant residues for human consumption is not particularly widespread. For direct consumption, only the freshly harvested leaves, the faba greens, are considered. According to Renna et al. [48], faba greens are traditionally consumed as “unconventional vegetable” in Puglia, a region in south-east Italy. They can either be eaten raw in salads or cooked liked spinach in pasta dishes, quiches, or omelettes. On the internet, there are some recipes and instructions for faba greens, but scientific literature on their composition is scarce.
Faba greens have the potential as unconventional food due to their composition. Compared to spinach, faba greens have a significantly higher protein content, contain more carbohydrates and dietary fibres, and have a lower nitrate content [48]. Etemadi et al. [69] investigated the element accumulation in different parts of six faba bean varieties. The concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and zinc were significantly lower in the leaves than in the seeds. However, the concentration of calcium and iron was more than eight times higher in the leaves than in the seeds. The accumulation of magnesium and manganese was also significantly higher. Faba bean leaves are thus supposed to be a good source of mineral and trace elements.
Besides, faba greens are a valuable source of phytochemicals, especially at a young age. In a comparative study, the leaves were shown to have significantly higher contents of vitamin C (four times higher), L-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanin (l-DOPA), being the precursor of dopamine (> 10 times), total flavonoid content (TFC) (> 40 times), and total phenolic content (TPC) (> 10 times) than the seeds [70]. Due to the higher concentrations of antioxidants, faba bean leaves exhibit a stronger antioxidant activity than the seeds.
However, the consumption of fresh faba bean leaves might be hampered by the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOC) inducing undesirable flavours. Duan et al. [71] detected a total of 69 different compounds in the fresh leaves with alcohols (72%), aldehydes (14%), ketones (5%), and esters (3%) accounting for more than 90%. The authors investigated the influence of four different domestic cooking methods on the composition of the leaves. A cooking time of 5 min was recommended, as it significantly reduced the content of VOC and improved the flavour without compromising the nutritional value. Microwaving and steaming were more effective than boiling and roasting although microwaving significantly increased the p-xylene content which might have harmful effects on the human health [71].
3.2 Harvest residues—feed use
In addition to the potentially food-relevant leaves, faba bean straw may either be fed as roughage or included in a mixed diet to a certain extent. The crude protein content of faba bean straw is about 8.7% (w/w) on average (Table 2). For optimum rumen microbial function of ruminants, the feed should contain at least 7% (w/w) crude protein [72]. This threshold is surpassed by most of the straws reported in literature. However, depending on the composition and the variety, the protein content can be significantly lower (e.g. 4.3% (w/w) in the cultivar Shallo [33]) or higher (e.g. 18.8% (w/w) in plant residues containing seeds [51]).
The metabolizable energy (ME) content of faba bean straw was reported to be between 6.2 and 9.2 MJ kg−1 DM for sheep [33, 52], between 6.3 and 6.7 MJ kg−1 in a rumen inoculum [34], and between 6.5 and 7.5 MJ kg−1 using a predictive model based on near-infrared spectrophotometry data [53]. Compared to other substrates, the ME content is rather low [72]. The amount of cell walls, measured by the neutral detergent fibre (NDF) content, is the primary chemical component that determines the rate of digestion [73]. The reported NDF content of faba bean straw ranges from 44.0 to 82.2% (w/w) with an average of 67.4% (w/w). According to Ellis et al. [74], fibrous feeds with NDF contents lower than 45% (w/w) can be classified as high-quality roughage, while those containing 45–65% (w/w) are categorized as of medium quality, and those with more than 65% (w/w) are considered low-quality roughage. Considering the fibre content, faba bean straw is thus of medium to low feeding quality.
Correspondingly to the high NDF content, the digestibility is rather low. In vitro dry matter digestibilities (IVDMD) between 54.7 and 58.8% (w/w) were reported [54, 55], while the in vitro organic matter digestibilities (IVOMD) of different faba bean varieties ranged from 45.1 to 62.6% (w/w) [33]. In comparison, the IVOMD of wheat bran and noug seed (Guizotia abyssinica) cake were 84.5% and 69.4% (w/w), respectively [33]. The in vivo digestibilities in sheep were found to be at 56% (dry matter) and 60% (organic matter) [56].
Feeding trials with faba bean straw have been carried out with sheep and rabbits. According to Fujihara and Nakao [75], the nutritive value of ensiled fibrous faba bean residues was higher than that of timothy hay, and the feedstock might be used as a roughage by sheep. Adding ensiled faba bean fibrous residues to low-quality timothy hay improved feed quality and increased ruminal ammonia concentration and the levels of the blood constituents in male Japanese Corriedale sheep [76].
In a study including 13 different straws (nine legume species, three rice varieties and rape) fed to adult merino sheep, faba bean straw showed average performance. Organic matter digestibility (48.3%) was moderate and dry matter intake (61 g kg−1 liveweight) was in the lower range of the studied legume straws but significantly higher compared to rice and rape straw. Feed quality of faba bean straw was improved by adding barley grain (20–40%, w/w) to the diet [52].
Asar et al. [57] investigated the effects of the inclusion of 25% (w/w) faba bean straw in the diet of weaned rabbits. Though the voluntary feed intake of diets containing faba bean straw was lower compared to the control diet, no significant differences in body weight gain were measured. The feed conversion ratio and the digestion coefficient values were significantly improved by including faba bean straw in the diet.
Feeding trials showed that faba bean straw can be used for animal nutrition. However, concerning nutritional value and digestibility, the biomass is considered of rather low quality. For optimum animal performance, the faba bean residues might require some nutrient supplementations or pre-treatments [54, 55]. Omar et al. [77] showed that microbial fermentation of faba bean by-products could enhance their nutritional value by increasing the concentration of crude protein and fat and decreasing the amount of crude fibre, lignin, and anti-nutrients. Similarly, the incubation of broad bean stalks with white-rot fungus Pleurotus ostreatus significantly improved their nutritive value [78].
In addition, to improve the forage quality, the cultivated variety can be selected appropriately, as the variety also has an impact on the suitability of the straw as feed. Wegi et al. [33] studied the effect of feeding five different varieties of faba bean straw to Arsi-Bale sheep in a diet consisting of 70% faba bean straw and 30% concentrate (wheat bran and noug seed cake). The straws showed great differences in composition and in intake, digestibility, feed conversion efficiency, and body weight gain.
3.3 Harvest residues—non-food use
The most widespread application of faba bean residues in the non-food sector is the (re-)incorporation into the soil, either fresh as green manure or dried as straw. Crop residues left on the field can exert several positive effects on the physical and chemical properties of the soil. Faba bean straw has shown to increase the water holding capacity, the field capacity, and the cation exchange capacity of a sandy soil [79]. Straw retention in the soil significantly improved soil organic carbon content (SOC), while straw removal remarkably reduced SOC [80]. Straw returning to a paddy and a dry-land soil in China promoted the aggregation of soil aggregates and increased the SOC content [81]. The incorporation of faba bean into the soil as green manure successfully reduced the weed emergence by up to 67% without compromising the emergence of maize [82] and significantly increased the potato tuber yield by up to 38% [83].
Apart from the benefits, there is a risk of elevated greenhouse gas emissions after application of legume residues due to their low C/N ratio which stimulates the formation and release of nitrous oxide (N2O) [5]. While ammonia (NH3) emissions are significantly reduced by applying faba bean green manure, N2O emissions might be comparable to mineral fertilizers [84]. However, the removal of crop residues from the field can cause negative nitrogen balances resulting in a potential depletion of the soil [35].
The removal of legume residues for non-food applications represents a significant trade-off between the bioeconomy and the soil quality. The amount of biomass that is taken from the cropping system should be carefully determined with respect to the specific local conditions [5, 80]. Depending on the chosen process, biomass might be partially returned to the soil as stabilized co-product that is more recalcitrant to degradation than the raw biomass and can maintain or even increase SOC [85].
Nevertheless, a variety of different applications for material and energetic use of faba bean straw have been proposed. Faba bean straw may be used as feedstock for thermochemical conversion processes such as combustion. An overview on the quality parameters of faba bean straw pellets, partially blended with another biomass, compared to the average of woody pellets, is given in Table 3.
The lower heating value of faba bean residue pellets was approximately 17 MJ kg−1 DM. Blending with maize and hemp residues did not significantly influence the calorific value, while the addition of potato skin decreased the calorific value. The heating value is similar to that of other herbaceous material and not significantly lower than wood pellets [87]. Pellet density ranged between 1100 and 1350 kg m−3 and met the requirements for biofuels [87].
High ash content negatively affects fuel quality due to deposit formation, increased fly ash emissions and higher efforts for ash storage and deposition [90]. Though the ash content is higher than that of wood pellets, it still remains below the permissible ash content of 7% (w/w) for mixed biomass pellets [91] except for the pellets made from faba bean residues and potato skin. The ash melting temperature was similar to that of other plant pellets [92].
Compared to woody pellets, faba bean pellets contain higher contents of nitrogen, chloride, and sulphur. Emission levels of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulphur dioxide (SO2), and unburned hydrocarbons (CxHy) were mostly higher compared to wood pellets but did not exceed the limit values [87, 88, 92]. The authors conclude that faba bean plant residues are an appropriate feedstock for combustion. However, Jensen et al. [5] point out that combustion might not be a sustainable conversion technology for nitrogen-rich legume biomass due to the formation of nitrogen oxide emissions.
Faba bean straw was also examined as feedstock for low-temperature pyrolysis at 350 °C for 4 h. The produced biochar was incorporated in four acidic soils at 1% (w/w) and showed positive impact on soil pH and cation exchange capacity. Soil acidity was reduced, and soil fertility improved [58]. While leguminous straw generally yielded more promising chars than non-leguminous feedstock, biochar from faba bean straw showed the lowest performance among the studied legumes [93].
Owing to their high polysaccharide and low lignin content, faba bean residues represent a promising feedstock for biochemical conversion processes. Legume biomass is generally well suited for anaerobic digestion due to the valuable content of nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients and has only slightly lower methane yields than maize and grass biomass [5]. Faba bean whole crop biomass (including the seeds) and straw have also mostly shown high methane production potential comparable to maize (Table 4). Neither ensiling nor wet oxidation of the feedstock improved the methane yield leading to the conclusion that pre-treatment of the biomass is not necessary [51, 59].
As faba bean residues contain high amounts of carbohydrates, they might represent an interesting feedstock in biorefinery processes in order to produce fermentable sugars [60]. Enzymatic hydrolysis resulted in a sugar yield of 28% (w/w) for untreated and 43% (w/w) for pre-treated (wet oxidation) faba bean straw. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation yielded 6.5% (w/w) ethanol without pre-treatment and 52% (w/w) after pre-treatment [59]. According to Pakarinen et al. [61], the fresh material can even be reasonably well hydrolysed (30% (w/w) of dry matter and 37% (w/w) of total carbohydrates) without a pre-treatment. However, the ethanol yield calculated based on the hydrolysis was significantly lower (196 L t−1 DM) than the theoretical ethanol yield (356 L t−1 DM), owing to the inaccessibility of the materials without a pre-treatment. Accordingly, in order to fully exploit the potential of faba bean residues, a pre-treatment should be applied. Alkaline pre-treated faba bean residues showed significantly higher saccharification levels compared to water and acid pre-treatment [30].
Faba bean waste was also considered as source of carbohydrates for a microbial fuel cell. Microbial fuel cells are emerging technologies that produce bioenergy by using microorganisms to degrade biological substrates. Mamani-Asqui et al. [62] dissolved faba bean residues in industrial wastewater inoculated with a bacterial consortium containing the exoelectrogenic bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resulting in an efficient fuel cell. Under optimized conditions (pH 5.5, residue concentration of 6 g L−1, temperature 32 °C), the fuel cell yielded a maximum potential of 802 mV and a maximum power density of 283 mW m−2. According to the authors, the developed fuel cell might be promising for rural areas with limited access to electricity.
The production of biohydrogen from faba bean residues proved only moderately fruitful. Faba bean stems were subjected to an acid hydrolysis using phosphoric acid up to 7% (v/v), followed by fermentative biohydrogen production using Clostridium butyricum and Enterobacter cloacae. Compared to corn cobs, faba bean stems showed significantly lower sugar production potential (166 vs. 427 g kg−1 raw material) and hydrogen yields (0.33 vs. 0.52 mol H2 per mol hexose) [60, 95].
Faba bean residues have rarely been investigated for their suitability for material and chemical applications. Álvarez-Iglesias et al. [96] explored the phytotoxic potential of aqueous extracts of faba bean straw in an in vitro study. The effect of extracts of varying concentration (10 to 67 g faba bean residues L−1) on the germination and growth of the forage crops maize and soybean and three representative summer weeds was measured. At low concentrations (< 50 g L−1), the extracts inhibited the germination and early growth of the weeds while not negatively affecting maize and soybean growth. The effectiveness was higher than that of the synthetic pre-emergence herbicide metolachlor. Faba bean straw extracts might thus be a promising agent for weed control in a sustainable agriculture, albeit experiments under field conditions are needed to corroborate the results [96].
Ground faba bean shoots were investigated for their potential to remove chromium(VI) from aqueous solutions in order to remediate industrial wastewaters. The maximum adsorption capacity (Qm) was about 19.4 mg g−1. Date palm leaves, however, provided higher removal efficiency (Qm = 22.5 mg g−1) and were more tolerant to different pH levels in the solution [97].
Faba bean stalks have shown to be a promising material for the production of biocomposites. Stalks were successfully liquefied in order to produce biopolyols and polyurethane foam, replacing fossil resources [22]. Faba bean stems were used to produce pulp and paper for corrugated cardboard using a soda semi-chemical pulping process. Biomass chips were digested with an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (95 g L−1) at 10% (w/w) solid content for 3 h, and the resulting pulp was pressed and refined. The produced papers had properties related to compression resistance similar or superior to secondary fibres and miscanthus fibres, yet the burst index and the tensile strength index were inferior. It was concluded that faba bean residues represent a promising feedstock for the paper industry. Additionally, hemicelluloses and lignin could be recovered from the spent cooking liquors for the production of value-added chemicals [63].
4 Processing residues—pods
Compared to the harvesting residues, only little research was conducted concerning the composition of the pods. An overview on the composition of the pods based on the existing data is given in Table 5. The main components of faba bean pods are fibres. On average, hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin together account for almost 55% (w/w). Cellulose makes up the major part (about 36%, w/w), while hemicellulose and lignin are mostly below 10% (w/w). As in the case of the harvesting residues, the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents show a fairly high variability. Faba bean pods are rich in dietary fibres (40.1% (w/w) [98]–57.5% (w/w) [99]). The crude protein content is rather high at about 14% (w/w), while the fat content is low (about 1%, w/w). The ash content is 8% (w/w) on average and is mainly composed of potassium, phosphorus, sodium, magnesium, calcium, and some trace elements like iron, copper, and zinc [99]. Unlike nitrogen and phosphorus, potassium is mainly accumulated in the pods leading to significantly higher concentrations compared to the seeds and leaves [69]. Faba bean pods contain appreciable amounts of bioactive phytochemicals such as flavonoids and tannins [99,100,101]. More than 100 phenolic compounds, mostly flavonoids and their glycosylated forms, were detected in the pods [100]. Total phenolic content (57–149 mg g−1 as gallic acid equivalents, GAE), flavonoid content (10.2–45.9 mg g−1 as rutin equivalents, RE), and antioxidant activity (0.7–4.5 Fe (II) mmol g−1) showed to be highest in the pods, compared to the seeds and the seed husk [102].
4.1 Pods—food use
Historically, the culinary use of faba pods, for example, in Italy, occurred in times of poverty and food scarcity and allowed the valorization of by-products as “unconventional vegetables” [36, 48]. Today in particular, bean pods as unconventional vegetable could enrich conventional dishes and thus satisfy the current increasing demand for high-quality food [105] and moreover serve as a source of other food-relevant ingredients.
Fresh bean pods are an important food source of protein, energy, and trace elements (Table 5). However, as already described for faba bean seeds, the content of both, macromolecular components and secondary metabolites, can vary quite strongly depending on origin, variety, environmental conditions, time of harvest, and much more [11,12,13,14,15]. For example, Mejri et al. [99] found significantly different fat, ash, and carbohydrate contents in bean pods than described by Mateos-Aparicio et al. in a previous publication [98] and attributed this to the growing location. In the same study, Mejri et al. [99] identified eleven fatty acids, with unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) being the most abundant fraction. The latter were predominantly composed of polyunsaturated essential linoleic acids (39.74%, w/w) and linolenic acids (24.99%, w/w). Palmitic acid (18.2%, w/w) and stearic acid (6.72%, w/w) are the most important saturated fatty acids, accounting for 30.78% (w/w) of the total fatty acids. A similarly large variance is evident when looking at the published values for the protein and carbohydrate contents of faba bean pods (Table 5).
In a cross-comparison of the ingredients of faba bean seeds with bean pods carried out by Renna et al. [36], the authors point out that, in contrast to the seeds, the faba pods have a significantly lower content of the anti-nutrient vicine, with an average of 0.9 g kg−1 DM. In comparison, for immature seeds of faba beans, a vicine content ranging between 4.5 and more than 20 g kg−1 DM was reported [106, 107]. As already mentioned, and in addition to vicine, other secondary plant compounds are contained in faba bean pods in not insignificant quantities, for example, phenolic compounds, L-DOPA and certain vitamins. Although the ascorbic acid content with an average of 0.4 g kg−1 FM in the bean pods is ten times lower than the reported values for immature seeds of faba beans, faba pods can still be estimated as a good source of vitamin C, when the recommended daily intake of 45–70 mg is considered [36].
In summary, the studies to date conclude that bean pods should not only be considered a by-product but should also be recognized as a new vegetable in the general food supply in the future or even functionally used in diets for certain diseases. As a possible further application for bean pods in the food industry, both pod flours and dietary fibres isolated from them have so far been investigated for their ability to positively influence baked goods by Belghith-Fendri et al. in 2016. In the first study, the authors investigated the effect of adding up to 1% (w/w) bean pod fibres to white bread doughs [108]. For the fibre extraction, pod flours were maintained in hot water at 70 °C for 15 min and filtrated to discard the insoluble residue. The fibre extracts were subsequently dried at 100 °C. Regarding the effects of dietary fibre (DF) on the texture of baked goods, the proportion of soluble dietary fibre (SDF) or insoluble dietary fibre (IDF) is decisive. While SDF, such as ß-glucan and arabinoxylan, have viscous and gelling properties, IDF primarily bind water. Thus, a positive effect of SDF on bread quality has already been described repeatedly, while a certain concentration of IDF had rather opposite effects. The total DF content for pea pods after extraction was 91.61% (w/w) DM with a proportion of SDF of 5.23% (w/w) and IDF of 86.38% (w/w) each based on dry matter. As a result, the values for broad been pod DF are in a similar range as reported for apple fibre [109]. The proportion of soluble and insoluble DF is also similar for both. In baking tests, a positive change in the rheological and textural properties of the dough was observed. At low concentrations (0.25 and 0.5% (w/w), the loaf volume of the breads was significantly reduced, while higher concentrations of the fibres did not cause differences compared to the control breads. The springiness of the breads was increased up to a fibre content of 0.75% (w/w), while it decreased again from 1% (w/w). Similar observations were also made for the adhesiveness and cohesiveness. The second publication describes the determination of the influence of flours from faba bean pods on the texture and sensory properties of cakes [103]. It was shown that pod flour up to a proportion of 15% (w/w) in the baking mix is suitable as a baking agent, also regarding acceptance in the sensory panel.
The content of bioactive compounds in faba bean pods offers another conceivable use in the food sector. By processing bean pods into extracts, it is possible to use them for food enrichment and functional food production or even to find applications in the pharmaceutical or fine chemical sector.
In 2018, Mejri et al. [99] published a study that investigated the ingredients of broad bean pods in depth. In addition to the study of mineral and lipid content as well as fatty acids and their nutritional quality, the content of bioactive phytochemicals such as phenols, flavonoids, and tannins was investigated. The review should serve to provide fundamental knowledge for the functional use of BBP, for example, as an ingredient in health-promoting bioproducts based on previously unused residues. Within their studies, Mejri et al. examined the most efficient solvents for extracting phenolic compounds from faba bean pods. Methanol proved to be the solvent of choice with the highest recovery of both TPC (115.2 mg GAE g−1 extract) and TFC (47.4 mg quercetin equivalents (QE) g−1 extract), followed by ethanol, butanol, and ethyl acetate. The highest TPC and TFC values in the methanol extract indicated that the phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the bean pods were of high polarity, including flavonoid glycosides and more polar aglycones. The use of ethyl acetate allowed the greatest proportion of condensed tannins to be extracted (4.6 mg catechin equivalents (CE) g−1 extract). Lu et al. [110] could demonstrate that in immature faba bean seeds, both TPC and TFC are strictly dependent on the stage of maturity of the plant. Comparable studies, particularly referring to the content and analytical detection of phenolic compounds from faba pods, have also been published by Chaieb et al. [102], Abu-Reidah et al. [100], and Loizzo et al. [111]. Loizzo et al. [111] showed that ( +)-catechin and ( −)-epicatechin are the two most prominent smaller phenolic compounds, with syringic acid also being detected. Furthermore, this study showed that significantly higher amounts of the two dominant compounds were found in the pods compared to bean seeds.
Faba bean pods are also considered to be a good material for the extraction of other considerable nutrients, such as glucans and pectins. While the maximum glucan yield (45 mg g−1) was attained at later maturity, the highest pectin yield (17.2%, w/w) was recovered at the first stage of maturation [112].
4.2 Pods—feed use
As shown in Table 5, pods are rich in cellulose and hemicellulose and eventually also in fibres. The protein content is compared with the fibre content relatively low (55.5% vs. 13.8%, w/w) [99]. Due to its high fibre content, it may only be suitable as feed for animals able to handle a high fraction of fibres in their feed. Furthermore, a high fibre content may hinder the digestion of the other compounds [113]. Additionally, to the composition shown in Table 5, pods contain compounds such as phenolic compounds which can exhibit among others antimicrobial and radical scavenging effects [99]. The bioactive compounds obtainable from pods make it even an effective functional food [99].
Valente et al. [114] also investigated the presence of phenolic compounds in faba bean pods and found various derivates of caffeic and coumaric acids. Like Mejri et al. [99], they highlighted the high TPC and the beneficial properties as natural antioxidants for animal and human nutrition and health. It was concluded that pods “may have a key role for both ruminant’s condition and dairy products’ enhanced quality” and that pods as feed source for ruminants may fulfil “the current demand for alternative feed sources and more sustainable supply chains” [114].
Despite the functional properties associated with faba bean pods, their digestibility and use as feed was described only in a few studies. For instance, Malushi et al. [104] compared the digestibility of different underutilized biomasses. Using defined in vitro methods, pepsin-cellulase digestion or the Tilley and Terry method, they evaluated the digestibility of alfalfa hay, cereal, and pea straws as well as faba bean pods. Depending on the digestion method, 59% and 72% (w/w) of Alfalfa hay, 30% and 47% (w/w) of cereal straw, 43% and 59% (w/w) of pea straw, as well as 39% and 61% (w/w) of faba bean pod was digestible. As a significant fraction of faba bean pods could be digested, the authors concluded that pods should not be underutilized and can be used as feed source.
Results of feeding experiments with faba bean pods fed to ruminants were published already in 1940 by Woodman and Evans [115]. They fed pod-meal to sheep. As already stated above, the authors also found satisfactory digestibility of roughly two-thirds of the feed. In particular, about 75% (w/w) of the nitrogen-free extractives (about 60%, w/w) of the total dry substance is digestible. The authors noted that “the process of lignification has not proceeded far in young pea-pods”. Young pods are therefore easier to digest and to utilize as feed.
4.3 Pods—non-food use
Faba bean pods have been considered for a wide range of applications, although the investigations were primarily proof-of-concept or screening studies, often consisting of an initial comparison of different agricultural residues. A focus has not yet emerged, and research is needed to further develop the applications suggested.
Faba bean pods were inspected for their general suitability as feedstock for the extraction of different chemicals and substances. The biomass showed to be a promising novel, eco-friendly source of cellulose and cellulose derivatives. Vallejo et al. [116] investigated a multi-step solvent extraction procedure to produce cellulose that can be applied in the biomedical field as a reinforcing material of composite scaffolds. Four sequential extraction steps eventually yielded 11.4% (w/w) of cellulose. Kassab et al. [117] evaluated the suitability of faba pods for the production of cellulose derivatives. Cellulose microfibres and cellulose nanocrystals were successfully extracted from the pods with a yield of 18% (w/w) of the raw pod weight and 66% (w/w) of the cellulose microfibre weight, respectively. The produced cellulose microfibres and nanocrystals might be used in various technological applications such as in the biomedicine, cosmetics, or electronics industry.
Additionally, faba bean pods showed to be a rich source of peroxidase enzymes that could potentially be applied in the environmental, biotechnological, chemical, or food industry. The percentage recovery after purification of peroxidases was at 8.9% and higher than for pea pods (4.3%) and artichoke stems (7.2%) [118]. Tyrosinase inhibitory peptides could successfully be extracted from the pods by enzymatic proteolysis. The generated peptides exhibit potential to be used in the nutraceutical field in order to cure or prevent diseases that are caused by high tyrosinase levels [119].
A few studies have also investigated the application of products derived from faba bean pods. Faba pod extracts were assessed for their nematicidal activity against three nematode species. Compared to seven other agricultural wastes, faba bean pods and cabbage leaves, hydro-alcohol extracts showed the highest in vitro nematistatic properties, which were additionally corroborated by in vivo assays. It was supposed that the nematicidal activity was derived from the presence of phenolic compounds [120]. A natural dye for wool fabrics could successfully be extracted via alkaline aqueous extraction from the pods. The aqueous extract was characterized by a dark brown colour, which is related to low molecular weight phenolic compounds and tannins [121].
Bouatay et al. [122] investigated the valorization of faba pods mucilage as a natural flocculent for the treatment of textile wastewater. At optimal experimental conditions, the decolorization, the chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal, and the turbidity abatement were of 92.3%, 97.5%, and 81.8%, respectively. The mucilage showed good flocculation performance. Compared to two commercial flocculants, COD removal was higher, while decolorization and turbidity removal were somewhat lower. Beyond that, faba bean pods were tested as sorption agent for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Qm for cadmium was 147.7 mg g−1 and thus significantly higher than that of peas and medlar peel and fig leaves (118.9, 98.1, and 103 mg g−1, respectively) [123].
5 Processing residues—husks
Similar to the pods, there is sparse information on the general composition of the faba bean husks. Table 6 gives an overview on a couple of data. The major fraction are carbohydrates, including dietary fibres, which make up to almost 80% (w/w) of the husk dry mass and starch, which amounts to only 3% (w/w) on average. The husks contain high-fibre fractions, which are mostly made of cellulose and to a lesser extent of hemicellulose and lignin. The average crude protein and fat contents are rather low at about 8% (w/w) and below 1% (w/w), respectively. The ash content is only 3% (w/w), but nonetheless, husks are considered to have a high mineral content [19].
TPC of husks was found to be between 21.5 and 110.3 mg GAE g−1 [19, 102, 138]. Compared to the seeds, TPC was four (V. faba major) to eight times higher (V. faba minor) in the husks [46]. Tannins contribute the most to TPC (55–80%) [46, 139]. Dehulling reduced the tannin content in the seeds by 72% (V. faba major) and 27% (V. faba minor) [46]. Flavonoid content in the husks ranges from 5.7 to 17.6 mg RE g−1 [102], being fivefold higher than in the seeds [46]. Owing to the high phenolic and tannin content, the husks show a strong antioxidant activity [19, 46].
5.1 Husks—food use
Dehulling harvested faba beans is useful to increase the nutritive benefits of the beans in various foods as the husks are rich in tannins, often believed being anti-nutrients or of low nutritional value because of their astringency, the possibility of complexing trace elements, decreasing feed intake, growth rate, protein digestibility, etc. [140,141,142]. However, due to their antioxidative character, tannins have also anticarcinogenic and antimutagenic potentials [141, 142].
As mentioned above, faba bean husks are rich in dietary fibres. One important fibre is pectin, which is used in many ways in food and pharmaceutical products due to its gelling, stabilizing, and emulsifying properties [143, 144]. As the global demand for pectin is steadily increasing and more and more industries emerge that require pectin [145], faba bean husks can be an excellent natural alternative to produce pectin [143, 146].
Faba bean husks can be a useful way to integrate phenolic compounds into foods as natural antioxidants, as they contain up to 110 mg GAE g−1 [19, 102, 138]. Due to the high TPC, husks of faba beans have high antioxidant properties. In experiments with enriched burger patties, results showed that faba bean husks improved cooking properties, delayed lipid and protein oxidation, prevented colour changes, and decreased the microbiological load of burger patties [147].
Husks of faba beans among other legumes were incorporated into the recipe of Turkish noodles with the results that there were slight changes in texture, but sensory acceptability was still present at 10% (w/w) enrichment [148]. Another possible application of faba beans husks is to incorporate them into bread and, thus, enrich it with dietary fibres. While satiating effects increased compared to non-enriched bread, consumer acceptance decreased slightly [149]. Further studies have shown that up to 21% of wheat flour can be substituted with faba bean husks without affecting the texture and volume of the bread. Unfortunately, subjective sensory acceptance was not investigated by a panel in this study [124]. The enrichment of corn-based extruded snacks with husks or ground-fermented faba beans increased the nutritional value and did not influence consumers’ acceptance [150].
In general, faba bean husks can improve the nutritional profile of foods, meeting increasing consumer demand for healthier foods with nutritionally valuable ingredients. In addition, it is advisable to improve the technofunctional and functional properties of the husks in the future through targeted technological processing and preparation, thus expanding their use in food.
5.2 Husks—feed use
As mentioned before, the anti-nutritional tannins limit the use of faba bean husks. In growing broiler chickens, it was shown that the addition of tannins to the basic feed significantly reduced protein digestibility and that this effect increased with increasing tannin content [151, 152]. The same could be observed for other animal species such as sheep [125] and pigs [126, 127]. In a group of sheep fed with husks, at least a slight increase in the nitrogen retention could be proven [125]. Rubio et al. [128] have not been able to find any effect from the inclusion of husks or autoclaved husks in the feed of broiler chickens compared to husk-free feed. This is also in line with the results from an experiment in which the feed of sheep was substituted with up to 33% (w/w) husks and no significant differences could be detected [129].
In feeding experiments with faba bean seeds with varying levels of tannin in the diet of turkeys, the body weight gains of the turkeys were independent of the diet. However, feed conversion was lower in the groups fed with seeds low in tannin content than in the groups fed with high tannin seeds. The authors state that tannin-containing seeds can be mixed into the feed up to 30% (w/w) without negative effects [153]. Furthermore, Trevino et al. confirmed in their studies that the weight of the chickens, the feed intake, and feed efficiency were reduced by adding tannins to the feed [154]. In other studies, it was shown that chicken feedstuff with husks from tannin-rich varieties of faba beans caused a reduction in the digestion of amino acids, starch, and lipids compared to non-tannin-rich varieties [155]. The authors explained this with the inactivation of digestive enzymes through the formation of tannin-enzyme complexes in the digestive tract. The addition of husks or beans to piglet feed modified the microflora, with the potential to prevent intestinal diseases through targeted legume supplements to the feed [156]. In further studies on the milk performance of dairy cows, it was found that the addition of 30% (w/w) field bean husks to the feed improved the milk yield, feed conversion, and fat content of the milk compared to the other treatments. In addition, the author described that up to 13.6% of the costs can be saved through this proportional substitution [130].
Considering these facts, it seems important to analyse the tannin content of faba bean husks and seeds in order to add the appropriate amounts to animal feed to have beneficial and cost-saving effects. Another possibility could be to focus on low-tannin varieties in cultivation and breeding.
5.3 Husks—non-food use
The focus of the non-food utilization of faba bean husks has so far been on the application as low-cost and environmentally friendly sorption agent to remove heavy metals and synthetic dyes from wastewaters. Qm derived from the Langmuir mono-layer adsorption model of different studies is given in Table 7. Activated carbon (AC) prepared from different feedstock is listed for comparison of the adsorption capacities as it is the most commonly used adsorbent. Admittedly, the capacities cannot be compared directly with each other, due to differing experimental conditions that influence Qm such as the temperature [157] and the pH value [158], yet a general evaluation can be obtained. It is evident that the untreated faba bean husks have significantly lower adsorption capacities than activated carbon, but they provide a low-cost and low-tech adsorption option. Nahali et al. [159] nevertheless deem it a promising adsorbent due to its regional abundance and the possibility to increase the adsorption capacity by experimental protocols that activate more sites. However, no concrete suggestions for procedures are given.
Other than adsorption, faba bean husks have been investigated as a natural colouring agent. Polyamide fabric samples were dyed with the aqueous extracts of husk powder, and different mordants were added. A colour gamut and a satisfactory dyeing performance could be achieved [167]. A variety of crop hull wastes, including faba beans, have been examined for their suitability as replacer of bleaching clays for the bleaching of crude soybean oil. The carbonized and activated husks could compete with the industrially used materials Fuller’s Earth and Tonsil N [168]. Furthermore, it was shown that the husks are suitable as substrate for the production of edible mushrooms, which in turn can be used for food and animal feed [131].
6 Conclusion
Several residual materials are produced throughout the harvesting and processing of faba beans. The plant residues constitute about 50% (w/w) of the whole aboveground biomass, while the empty pods and husks account for about 11% and 6% (w/w) on average, respectively. This paper highlighted the food, feed, and non-food valorization of those residues.
The most widespread application of the plant residues is the reincorporation into the soil as green manure. Removal of residues could adversely affect soil quality; thus, consideration must always be given to what quantities can be reasonably removed. Nevertheless, a variety of bioeconomic applications have been investigated, including conventional processes such as combustion, anaerobic digestion, or ethanol production but also novel applications such as wastewater remediation, production of biocomposites, or production of pulp and paper. The fresh faba greens have potential as an unconventional vegetable due to their nutrient-rich composition. The straw might be used as roughage or in a mixed diet for animals, but since the metabolizable energy content and the digestibility are rather low, supplementation or pre-treatment might be necessary to attain optimum animal performance.
Faba bean pods are only produced as a separate fraction when the beans are freshly harvested; otherwise, they are part of the harvest residues. Owing to their nutrient-rich composition, the pods should be recognized as a new vegetable for human consumption. Likewise, the pods constitute a source for the extraction of several value-added compounds, such as cellulose, peroxidases, or bioactive substances. The use of faba pods in the feed sector has been little studied so far. Despite their high-fibre content, they can be beneficial for animal nutrition as a source of bioactive substances. In addition, it was shown that the pods might be effective in remediating wastewater.
Both when consuming fresh and dry beans, the husks are usually removed in order to increase the nutritive benefits of the beans, as the husks contain high contents of anti-nutrients. Therefore, they should only be included in diets to a certain extent, for example, to enrich food products with antioxidants or fibres. In the feed sector, the use of the husks is also limited by the anti-nutritional properties, and the tannin content should be carefully monitored before including the husks in an animal’s diet. Until now, research on the husks in the non-food sector has focused on the application as a low-cost environmentally friendly sorption agent to remove heavy metals and synthetic dyes from wastewater.
This review paper has shown that the residual materials of faba beans contain valuable components and might be used for a multitude of different applications, be it in the food, feed, or non-feed sector. The material should thus not be disposed of but further valorised in order to exploit the full potential of the biomass. However, especially with regard to food and non-food use, the valorization processes still have to be established. Further research is particularly needed to unleash the potential of husks and pods for different applications.
Data availability
Access to data will be provided upon request.
Abbreviations
- AC :
-
Activated carbon
- CE :
-
Catechin equivalents
- COD :
-
Chemical oxygen demand
- DF :
-
Dietary fibre
- DM :
-
Dry matter
- FM :
-
Fresh matter
- GAE :
-
Gallic acid equivalents
- IDF :
-
Insoluble dietary fibre
- IVDMD :
-
In vitro dry matter digestibility
- IVOMD :
-
In vitro organic matter digestibility
- L-DOPA :
-
L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanin
- LHV :
-
Lower heating value
- NDF :
-
Neutral detergent fibre
- ME :
-
Metabolizable energy
- Qm :
-
Maximum adsorption capacity
- QE :
-
Quercetin equivalents
- RE :
-
Rutin equivalents
- SD :
-
Standard deviation
- SDF :
-
Soluble dietary fibre
- SOC :
-
Soil organic carbon
- TFC :
-
Total flavonoid content
- TPC :
-
Total phenolic content
- VOC :
-
Volatile organic compound
- VS :
-
Volatile solids
References
Crépon K, Marget P, Peyronnet C, Carrouée B, Arese P, Duc G (2010) Nutritional value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds for feed and food. Field Crop Res 115:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.016
Nadal S, Suso MJ, Moreno MT (2003) Management of Vicia faba genetic resources: changes associated to the selfing process in the major, equina and minor groups. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022944017530
FAOSTAT (2022) Crops and livestock products. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize. Accessed 14 Mar 2022
European Commission. Statistical Office of the European Union (2016) Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics :2016 edition. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2785/147560
Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Boddey RM, Gresshoff PM, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Alves JRB, Morrison MJ (2012) Legumes for mitigation of climate change and the provision of feedstock for biofuels and biorefineries A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:329–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7
Köpke U, Nemecek T (2010) Ecological services of faba bean. Field Crop Res 115:217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.012
Meng Z, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Chen J, Sun Z, Ren C, Zhang Z, Cheng X, Huang Y (2021) Nutritive value of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) as a feedstuff resource in livestock nutrition: a review. Food Sci Nutr 9:5244–5262. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2342
Mohammed SG, Qoronfleh MW (2020) Seeds. Personalized food intervention and therapy for autism spectrum disorder management. Springer, Cham, pp 421–467
Turco I, Ferretti G, Bacchetti T (2016) Review of the health benefits of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) polyphenols. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research 55:283–293
Hussein LA (1982) Antinutritional factors in faba beans. In: Hawtin G, Webb C (eds) Faba bean improvement World crops: production, utilization, and description, vol. 6. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 333–341
Mayer Labba I-C, Frøkiær H, Sandberg A-S (2021) Nutritional and antinutritional composition of fava bean (Vicia faba L., var. minor) cultivars. Food Res Int 140:110038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110038
Witten S, Böhm H, Aulrich K (2015) Effect of variety and environment on the contents of crude nutrients, lysine, methionine and cysteine in organically produced field peas (Pisum sativum L.) and field beans (Vicia faba L.). Landbauforschung - Appl Agric Forestry Res 205–216. https://doi.org/10.3220/LBF1447765843000
Walter S, Zehring J, Mink K, Quendt U, Zocher K, Rohn S (2022) Protein content of peas (Pisum sativum) and beans (Vicia faba)—influence of cultivation conditions. J Food Compos Anal 105:104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104257
Zehring J, Walter S, Quendt U, Zocher K, Rohn S (2022) Phytic acid content of faba beans (Vicia faba)—annual and varietal effects, and influence of organic cultivation practices. Agronomy 12:889. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040889
Musallam IW, Al-Karaki G, Ereifej KI, Tawaha A-R (2004) Chemical composition of faba bean genotypes under rainfed and irrigation conditions. Int J Agric Biol 6:359–362
Muschiolik G, Schmandke H (2000) Funktionelle Eigenschaften von Ackerbohnenprodukten (Vicia faba). Ernährung, Biochemie und Verarbeitung. Berichte aus der Ernährungswissenschaft. Shaker, Aachen
Alandia G, Pulvento C, Sellami MH, Hoidal N, Anemone T, Nigussie E, Agüero JJ, Lavini A, Jacobsen S-E (2020) Grain legumes may enhance high-quality food production in Europe. In: Hirich A, Choukr-Allah R, Ragab R (eds) Emerging research in alternative crops, vol 58. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 25–53
Tanno K, Willcox G (2006) The origins of cultivation of Cicer arietinum L. and Vicia faba L.: early finds from Tell el-Kerkh, north-west Syria, late 10th millennium b.p. Veget Hist Archaeobot 15:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-005-0027-5
Çalışkantürk Karataş S, Günay D, Sayar S (2017) In vitro evaluation of whole faba bean and its seed coat as a potential source of functional food components. Food Chem 230:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.03.037
Tawaha AM, Turk MA (2001) Crop-weed competition studies in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under rainfed conditions. Acta Agron Hung 49:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.49.2001.3.11
Duc G, Aleksić JM, Marget P, Mikic A, Paull J, Redden RJ, Sass O, Stoddard FL, Vandenberg A, Vishnyakova M et al (2015) Faba bean. In: de Ron AM (ed) Grain legumes, vol. 10. Springer, New York, pp 141–178
Zhang W, Li L, Li Q, Li X, Zhang Y (2014) Preparation and characterization of biopolyols and polyurethane foams from liquefied faba bean stalk. Cell Polym 33:301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/026248931403300602
Al-Rifaee M, Turk MA, Tawaha A (2004) Effect of seed size and plant population density on yield and yield components of local faba bean (Vicia faba L. Major). Int J Agric Biol 6:294–299
Mitiku A, Wolde M (2015) Effect of faba bean (Vicia Faba L.) varieties on yield attributes at Sinana and Agarfa districts of Bale zone, Southeastern Ethiopia. JJBS 8:281–286. https://doi.org/10.12816/0027064
Coelho JC, Pinto PA (1989) Plant density effects on the growth and development of winter faba bean (Vicia faba L. var minor). Faba Bean Information Service 25:26–30
Aguilera-Diaz C, Recalde-Manrique L (1995) Effects of plant density and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on field beans (Vicia faba). J Agric Sci 125:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600074530
Loss SP, Siddique KHM, Jettner R, Martin LD (1998) Responses of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) to sowing rate in south-western Australia. I. Seed yield and economic optimum plant density. Aust J Agric Res 49:989. https://doi.org/10.1071/A98002
Stützel H, Aufhammer W (1992) Grain yield in determinate and indeterminate cultivars of Vicia faba with different plant distribution patterns and population densities. J Agric Sci 118:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600070714
Nebiyu A, Diels J, Boeckx P (2016) Phosphorus use efficiency of improved faba bean (Vicia faba) varieties in low-input agro-ecosystems. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201500488
Gómez LD, Amalfitano C, Andolfi A, Simister R, Somma S, Ercolano MR, Borrelli C, McQueen-Mason SJ, Frusciante L, Cuciniello A, Caruso G et al (2017) Valorising faba bean residual biomass: effect of farming system and planting time on the potential for biofuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 107:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.10.019
Mwanamwenge J, Loss S, Siddique K, Cocks P (1999) Effect of water stress during floral initiation, flowering and podding on the growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Eur J Agron 11:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00003-9
De Costa W, Dennett MD, Ratnaweera U, Nyalemegbe K (1997) Effects of different water regimes on field-grown determinate and indeterminate faba bean (Vicia faba L.). II. Yield, yield components and harvest index. Field Crop Res 52:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01060-X
Wegi T, Tolera A, Wamatu J, Animut G, Rischkowsky B (2018) Effects of feeding different varieties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) straws with concentrate supplement on feed intake, digestibility, body weight gain and carcass characteristics of Arsi-Bale sheep. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 31:1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0736
Alkhtib AS, Wamatu JA, Wegi T, Rischkowsky BA (2016) Variation in the straw traits of morphological fractions of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) and implications for selecting for food-feed varieties. Anim Feed Sci Technol 222:122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.10.006
Nebiyu A, Vandorpe A, Diels J, Boeckx P (2014) Nitrogen and phosphorus benefits from faba bean (Vicia faba L.) residues to subsequent wheat crop in the humid highlands of Ethiopia. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 98:253–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9609-x
Renna M, De Cillis F, Leoni B, Acciardi E, Santamaria P (2020) From by-product to unconventional vegetable: preliminary evaluation of fresh fava hulls highlights richness in L-Dopa and low content of anti-nutritional factor. Foods 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020159
Luzardo-Ocampo I, Cuellar-Nuñez ML, Oomah BD, Loarca-Piña G (2020) Pulse by-products. In: Campos Vega R, Oomah BD, Vergara-Castañeda HA (eds) Food wastes and by-products. Nutraceutical and health potential, 1st edn. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 59–92
Stoleru V, Gómez LD, Amalfitano C, Munteanu N, Sellitto VM, Caruso G (2016) Yield, seed quality and residual biomass chemical composition of organic faba bean as affected by farming system and planting time. LUCRĂRI ŞTIINŢIFICE SERIA HORTICULTURĂ, 59
Amalfitano C, Agrelli D, Borrelli C, Cuciniello A, Morano G, Caruso G (2018) Production system effects on growth, pod yield and seed quality of organic faba bean in southern Italy. Folia Horticulturae 30:375–385. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2018-0033
Baginsky C, Silva P, Auza J, Acevedo E (2013) Evaluation for fresh consumption of new broad bean genotypes with a determinate growth habit in central Chile. Chilean J Agric Res 73:225–232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392013000300004
Grenz J, Manschadi A, Uygur F, Sauerborn J (2005) Effects of environment and sowing date on the competition between faba bean (Vicia faba) and the parasitic weed Orobanche crenata. Field Crop Res 93:300–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.11.001
Jensen ES, Peoples MB, Hauggaard-Nielsen H (2010) Faba bean in cropping systems. Field Crop Res 115:203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.008
Dhull SB, Kidwai MK, Siddiq M, Sidhu JS (2022) Faba (broad) bean production, processing, and nutritional profile. In: Siddiq M, Uebersax MA (eds) Dry beans and pulses. Wiley, pp 359–381
Duc G, Marget P, Esnault R, Le Guen J, Bastianelli D (1999) Genetic variability for feeding value of faba bean seeds (Vicia faba): comparative chemical composition of isogenics involving zero-tannin and zero-vicine genes. J Agric Sci 133:185–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699006905
Frejnagel S, Zduńczyk Z, Krefft B (1997) The chemical composition and nutritive value of low- and high-tannin faba bean varieties. J Anim Feed Sci 6:401–412. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69536/1997
Boudjou S, Oomah BD, Zaidi F, Hosseinian F (2013) Phenolics content and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of legume fractions. Food Chem 138:1543–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.108
Patras A, Oomah BD, Gallagher E (2011) By-product utilization. In: Tiwari BK, Gowen A, McKenna B (eds) Pulse foods. Processing, quality and nutraceutical applications. Elsevier Science & Technology, San Diego, pp 325–362
Renna M, Signore A, Paradiso VM, Santamaria P (2018) Faba greens, globe artichoke’s offshoots, crenate broomrape and summer squash greens: unconventional vegetables of Puglia (southern Italy) with good quality traits. Front Plant Sci 9:378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00378
López S, Davies DR, Giráldez FJ, Dhanoa MS, Dijkstra J, France J (2005) Assessment of nutritive value of cereal and legume straws based on chemical composition and in vitro digestibility. J Sci Food Agric 85:1550–1557. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2136
Sipos P, Nábrádi A, Győri Z (2010) Examination of chemical composition and calorific value of cereal straw. Acta Agron Hung 58:97–101. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.58.2010.1.12
Pakarinen A, Maijala P, Jaakkola S, Stoddard FL, Kymäläinen M, Viikari L (2011) Evaluation of preservation methods for improving biogas production and enzymatic conversion yields of annual crops. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-20
Abreu J, Bruno-Soares A (1998) Characterization and utilization of rice, legume and rape straws. In: Antongiovanni M (ed) Exploitation of Mediterranean Roughage and by-products. CIHEAM, Zaragoza, pp 39–51
Bezabih M, Mekonnen K, Adie A, Tadesse T, Nurfeta A, Dubale W, Habiso T, Kelkay TZ, Getnet M, Ergano K, Duncan AJ, Thorne P (2022) Redesigning traditional weed management practices in faba bean fields to optimize food-feed production in the smallholder system. Agron J 114:248–258. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20779
Gurmessa K, Tolemariam T, Tolera A, Beyene F (2016) Production and utilization of crop residues in Horro and Guduru districts, western Ethiopia. Food Sci Qual Manag 48:77–84
Bogale S, Melaku S, Yami A (2008) Potential use of crop residues as livestock feed resources under smallholder farmers conditions in bale highlands of Ethiopia. Tropic Subtropic Agroecosyst 8:107–114
Hadjipanayiotou M, Economides S, Koumas A (1985) Chemical composition, digestibility and energy content of leguminous grains and straws grown in a Mediterranean region. Ann Zootech 34:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19850103
Asar MA, Osman M, Yakout HM, Safoat A (2010) Utilization of corn-cob meal and faba bean straw in growing rabbits diets and their effects on performance, digestibility and economical efficiency. Egypt Poult Sci 30:415–442
Yuan J-H, Xu R-K (2012) Effects of biochars generated from crop residues on chemical properties of acid soils from tropical and subtropical China. Soil Res 50:570. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR12118
Petersson A, Thomsen M, Haugaard-Nielsen H, Thomsen A (2007) Potential bioethanol and biogas production using lignocellulosic biomass from winter rye, oilseed rape and faba bean. Biomass Bioenerg 31:812–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.001
Gomora-Hernandez JC, Carreno-de León, M. del C., Flóres-Álamo N, Hernandez-Berriel MC (2019) Dilute phosphoric acid hydrolysis of lignocelluloses. Effect of acid concentration and biomass composition. In: Frontier Science in Engineering: Solutions that Benefit Society. The First International Conference on Engineering, TecNM/ITToluca Metepec, México, September 4–6, 2019 Proceedings
Pakarinen A, Maijala P, Stoddard FL, Santanen A, Tuomainen P, Kymäläinen M, Viikari L (2011) Evaluation of annual bioenergy crops in the boreal zone for biogas and ethanol production. Biomass Bioenerg 35:3071–3078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.022
Mamani-Asqui LJ, Peredo-Berlanga LN, Roque Rodríguez FJ, Salazar-Banda GR (2021) Vicia faba crop residues for sustainable electricity generation using a sludge-based microbial fuel cell. CABEQ 34:289–296. https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2020.1857
Gonzalo A, Bimbela F, Sánchez JL, Labidi J, Marín F, Arauzo J (2017) Evaluation of different agricultural residues as raw materials for pulp and paper production using a semichemical process. J Clean Prod 156:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.036
Bruno-Soares A, Abreu J, Guedes C, Dias-da-Silva A (2000) Chemical composition, DM and NDF degradation kinetics in rumen of seven legume straws. Anim Feed Sci Technol 83:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00113-3
García A, González Alriols M, Labidi J (2014) Evaluation of different lignocellulosic raw materials as potential alternative feedstocks in biorefinery processes. Ind Crops Prod 53:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.12.019
Gebremeskel Y, Estifanos A, Melaku S (2011) Effect of selected faba bean (Vicia faba L.) varietal difference on straw DM yield, chemical composition and nutritional quality. J Drylands 4:333–340
Khereba A, Farrag A, Hassan F, Waheed M (2010) Influence of some agricultural wastes on growth, yield and nutritional values of winter mushroom (Flammulina velutipes (Curtis) Singer). Egypt J Agric Sci 61:299–306. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejarc.2010.215471
Stagnari F, Pisante M (2010) Managing faba bean residues to enhance the fruit quality of the melon (Cucumis melo L.) crop. Sci Hortic 126:317–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.004
Etemadi F, Barker AV, Hashemi M, Zandvakili OR, Park Y (2018) Nutrient accumulation in faba bean varieties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49:2064–2073. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1495729
Duan S-C, Kwon S-J, Eom S-H (2021) Effect of thermal processing on color, phenolic compounds, and antioxidant activity of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) leaves and seeds. Antioxidants 10:1207. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10081207
Duan S, Kwon S-J, Gil CS, Eom SH (2022) Improving the antioxidant activity and flavor of faba (Vicia faba L.) leaves by domestic cooking methods. Antioxidants 11:931. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050931
Van Soest PJ (1994) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant, 2nd edn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh J, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG (2011) Animal nutrition, 7th edn. Pearson Education, San Francisco
Ellis WC, Wylie MJ, Matis JH (1988) Dietary-digestive interactions determining the feeding value of forages and roughages. In: Ørskov ER (ed) Feed science. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Fujihara T, Nakao T (1982) Eating and rumination behaviour in sheep given silage made from the fibrous residue of broad bean (Vicia faba L.). J Agric Sci 98:237–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600041368
Fujihara T, Hanabusa Y, Ishida R, Ohshima M (1988) A feeding experiment with the fibrous residue silages made from broad bean (Vicia faba L.) and lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in sheep. Jpn J Grassland Sci 34:119–123. https://doi.org/10.14941/grass.34.119
Omar AE, Al-Khalaifah HS, Ismail TA, Abd El-Aziz RM, El-Mandrawy SAM, Shalaby SI, Ibrahim D (2021) Performance, serum biochemical and immunological parameters, and digestive enzyme and intestinal barrier-related gene expression of broiler chickens fed fermented fava bean by-products as a substitute for conventional feed. Front Vet Sci 8:696841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.696841
Nie H, Wang Z, You J, Zhu G, Wang H, Wang F (2020) Comparison of in vitro digestibility and chemical composition among four crop straws treated by Pleurotus ostreatus. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 33:24–34. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0023
Mohamed MS, Rashad RT (2020) Studying some characteristics of sandy soil amended by water hyacinth, bean straw, and compost. Egypt J Soil Sci 60:53–65. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejss.2019.18969.1322
Monteleone M, Cammerino ARB, Garofalo P, Delivand MK (2015) Straw-to-soil or straw-to-energy? An optimal trade off in a long term sustainability perspective. Appl Energy 154:891–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.108
Huang R, Lan M, Liu J, Gao M (2017) Soil aggregate and organic carbon distribution at dry land soil and paddy soil: the role of different straws returning. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:27942–27952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0372-9
Álvarez-Iglesias L, Puig CG, Revilla P, Reigosa MJ, Pedrol N (2018) Faba bean as green manure for field weed control in maize. Weed Res 58:437–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12335
Sincik M, Turan ZM, Göksoy AT (2008) Responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to green manure cover crops and nitrogen fertilization rates. Am J Pot Res 85:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-008-9011-9
Ferrara RM, Carozzi M, Decuq C, Loubet B, Finco A, Marzuoli R, Gerosa G, Di Tommasi P, Magliulo V, Rana G (2021) Ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and water vapor fluxes after green manuring of faba bean under Mediterranean climate. Agric Ecosyst Environ 315:107439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107439
Andrade Díaz C, Clivot H, Albers A, Zamora-Ledezma E, Hamelin L (2023) The crop residue conundrum: maintaining long-term soil organic carbon stocks while reinforcing the bioeconomy, compatible endeavors? Appl Energy 329:120192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120192
Duca D, Riva G, Foppa Pedretti E, Toscano G (2014) Wood pellet quality with respect to EN 14961–2 standard and certifications. Fuel 135:9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.042
Jasinskas A, Minajeva A, Šarauskis E, Romaneckas K, Kimbirauskienė R, Pedišius N (2020) Recycling and utilisation of faba bean harvesting and threshing waste for bioenergy. Renew Energy 162:257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.070
Minajeva A, Jasinskas A, Romaneckas K, Aboltins A (2018) Evaluation of fodder bean waste utilization for energy purposes. In: 17th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development. Latvia University of Agriculture
Petlickaitė R, Jasinskas A, Mieldažys R, Romaneckas K, Praspaliauskas M, Balandaitė J (2022) Investigation of pressed solid biofuel produced from multi-crop biomass. Sustainability 14:799. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020799
Obernberger I, Brunner T, Bärnthaler G (2006) Chemical properties of solid biofuels—significance and impact. Biomass Bioenerg 30:973–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.06.011
Nunes L, Matias J, Catalão J (2014) Mixed biomass pellets for thermal energy production: a review of combustion models. Appl Energy 127:135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.042
Minajeva A, Jasinskas A, Domeika R, Vaiciukevičius E, Lemanas E, Bielski S (2021) The study of the faba bean waste and potato peels recycling for pellet production and usage for energy conversion. Energies 14:2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102954
Yuan J-H, Xu R-K (2011) The amelioration effects of low temperature biochar generated from nine crop residues on an acidic Ultisol. Soil Use Manag 27:110–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2010.00317.x
Gatta G, Gagliardi A, Soldo P, Monteleone M (2013) Grasses and legumes in mixture: an energy intercropping system intended for anaerobic digestion. Ital J Agronomy 8:7. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2013.e7
Gomora-Hernandez JC, Alcantara-Diaz D, Fernandez-Valverde SM, Hernandez-Berriel MC (2016) Biohydrogen production by anaerobic digestion of corn cob and stem of faba bean hydrolysates. In: 2016 XVI International Congress of the Mexican Hydrogen Society (CSMH). IEEE, pp 1–6
Álvarez-Iglesias L, Puig CG, Garabatos A, Reigosa MJ, Pedrol N (2014) Vicia faba aqueous extracts and plant material can suppress weeds and enhance crops. Allelopath J 34:299–314
Fawzy M, Nasr M, Abdel-Gaber A, Fadly S (2016) Biosorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using agricultural wastes, with artificial intelligence approach. Sep Sci Technol 51:416–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2015.1115068
Mateos-Aparicio I, Redondo-Cuenca A, Villanueva-Suárez M-J, Zapata-Revilla M-A, Tenorio-Sanz M-D (2010) Pea pod, broad bean pod and okara, potential sources of functional compounds. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1467–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2010.05.008
Mejri F, Selmi S, Martins A, Benkhoud H, Baati T, Chaabane H, Njim L, Serralheiro MLM, Rauter AP, Hosni K (2018) Broad bean (Vicia faba L.) pods: a rich source of bioactive ingredients with antimicrobial, antioxidant, enzyme inhibitory, anti-diabetic and health-promoting properties. Food Funct 9:2051–2069. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8fo00055g
Abu-Reidah IM, Arráez-Román D, Warad I, Fernández-Gutiérrez A, Segura-Carretero A (2017) UHPLC/MS2-based approach for the comprehensive metabolite profiling of bean (Vicia faba L.) by-products: a promising source of bioactive constituents. Food Res Int 93:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.01.014
Kalili A, El Ouafi R, Aboukhalaf A, Naciri K, Tbatou M, Essaih S, Belahyan A, Belahsen R (2022) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of extracts from Moroccan fresh fava beans pods (Vicia faba L.). Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 73:79–86. https://doi.org/10.32394/rpzh.2022.0194
Chaieb N, González JL, López-Mesas M, Bouslama M, Valiente M (2011) Polyphenols content and antioxidant capacity of thirteen faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes cultivated in Tunisia. Food Res Int 44:970–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.02.026
Belghith-Fendri L, Chaari F, Kallel F, Zouari-Ellouzi S, Ghorbel R, Besbes S, Ellouz-Chaabouni S, Ghribi-Aydi D (2016) Pea and broad bean pods as a natural source of dietary fiber: the impact on texture and sensory properties of cake. J Food Sci 81:C2360–C2366. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.13448
Malushi N, Papa L, Maia M, Oliveira H (2017) Determination of chemical content and dry matter digestibility of some under-utilized feeds in ruminants feeding through two in vitro methods. Anim Sci LX:91–96
Signore A, Renna M, Santamaria P (2019) Agrobiodiversity of vegetable crops: aspect, needs, and future perspectives. Annual Plant Reviews 2:1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0687
De Cillis F, Leoni B, Massaro M, Renna M, Santamaria P (2019) Yield and quality of faba bean (Vicia faba L. var. major) genotypes as a vegetable for fresh consumption: a comparison between Italian landraces and commercial varieties. Agriculture 9:253. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9120253
Gardiner EE, Marquardt RR, Kemp G (1982) Variation in vicine and convicine concentration of faba bean genotypes. Can J Plant Sci 62:589–592. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps82-088
Belghith Fendri L, Chaari F, Maaloul M, Kallel F, Abdelkafi L, Ellouz Chaabouni S, Ghribi-Aydi D (2016) Wheat bread enrichment by pea and broad bean pods fibers: effect on dough rheology and bread quality. LWT 73:584–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.06.070
Figuerola F, Hurtado ML, Estévez AM, Chiffelle I, Asenjo F (2005) Fibre concentrates from apple pomace and citrus peel as potential fibre sources for food enrichment. Food Chem 91:395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.04.036
Lu Y, Tian C, Gao C, Wang B, Yang W, Kong X, Chai L, Chen G, Yin X, He Y (2018) Phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity and inhibitory effects on α-glucosidase and lipase of immature faba bean seeds. Int J Food Prop 21:2366–2377. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1522331
Loizzo MR, Bonesi M, Leporini M, Falco T, Sicari V, Tundis R (2021) Chemical profile and in vitro bioactivity of Vicia faba beans and pods. Proceedings 70:45. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods_2020-07712
Fazio A, La Torre C, Dalena F, Plastina P (2020) Screening of glucan and pectin contents in broad bean (Vicia faba L.) pods during maturation. Eur Food Res Technol 246:333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03347-4
Castro-Bedriñana J, Chirinos-Peinado D (2021) Nutritional value of some raw materials for guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) feeding. Transl Anim Sci 5:txa019. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txab019
Valente IM, Maia MRG, Malushi N, Oliveira HM, Papa L, Rodrigues JA, Fonseca AJM, Cabrita ARJ (2018) Profiling of phenolic compounds and antioxidant properties of European varieties and cultivars of Vicia faba L. pods. Phytochemistry 152:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.05.011
Woodman HE, Evans RE (1940) The composition and nutritive value, when fed to ruminants, of pea-pod meal and broad-bean-pod meal. J Agric Sci 30:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600047961
Vallejo M, Cordeiro R, Dias PAN, Moura C, Henriques M, Seabra IJ, Malça CM, Morouço P (2021) Recovery and evaluation of cellulose from agroindustrial residues of corn, grape, pomegranate, strawberry-tree fruit and fava. Bioresour Bioprocess 8:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-021-00377-3
Kassab Z, Abdellaoui Y, Salim MH, El Achaby M (2020) Cellulosic materials from pea (Pisum sativum) and broad beans (Vicia faba) pods agro-industrial residues. Materials Letters 280:128539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128539
Mejri F, Karmali A, Jaoued N, Casabianca H, Hosni K (2019) Purification and partial characterization of peroxidases from three food waste by-products: broad bean pods, pea pods, and artichoke stems. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 189:576–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-019-03028-8
El-Sayed ST, Al-Azzouny RA, Ali OS (2019) Purification of a novel monophenolase inhibitory peptides prepared from Vicia faba pods protein via enzymatic hydrolysis. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 19:101123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101123
Roshan-Bakhsh A, Pourjam E, Ayyari M, Pedram M (2019) Biocontrol properties of some agricultural waste extracts on three nematode species in in vitro and in vivo conditions. Nematol 21:837–846. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685411-00003258
Bouatay F, Baaka N, Shahid A, Mhenni MF (2019) A novel natural source Vicia faba L. membranes as colourant: development and optimisation of the extraction process using response surface methodology (RSM). Nat Prod Res 33:59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1434632
Bouatay F, Eljebsi N, Dridi-Dhaouadi S, Mhenni F (2017) Valorization of the Vicia faba mucilage on textile wastewater treatment as a bio-flocculant: process development and optimization using response surface methodology (RSM). Water Sci Technol 75:629–642. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.480
Benaïssa H (2006) Screening of new sorbent materials for cadmium removal from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 132:189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.085
Ni Q, Ranawana V, Hayes HE, Hayward NJ, Stead D, Raikos V (2020) Addition of broad bean hull to wheat flour for the development of high-fiber bread: effects on physical and nutritional properties. Foods 9:1192. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091192
Minakowski D, Skórko-Sajko H, Falkowska A (1996) Nutritive value of faba bean hulls for ruminants. J Anim Feed Sci 5:225–233. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/69602/1996
Jansman A, Verstegen M, Huisman J (1993) Effects of dietary inclusion of hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with a low and high content of condensed tannins on digestion and some physiological parameters in piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 43:239–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90080-4
Jansman AJ, Verstegen MW, Huisman J, van den Berg JW (1995) Effects of hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with a low or high content of condensed tannins on the apparent ileal and fecal digestibility of nutrients and the excretion of endogenous protein in ileal digesta and feces of pigs. J Anim Sci 73:118–127. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.731118x
Rubio LA, Brenes A, Castaño M (1990) The utilization of raw and autoclaved faba beans (Vicia faba L., var. minor) and faba bean fractions in diets for growing boiler chickens. Br J Nutr 63:419–430. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19900130
Kibret W, Asmare B, Mekuriaw Y (2021) Effects of faba bean hull, noug seed (Guizotia Abyssinica) cake, wheat bran and their mixtures supplementation on biological performance and economic benefits of Farta sheep fed natural pasture hay in Ethiopia. Sci Papers: Anim Sci Biotechnol 54:18–30
Al-Saiday MY (1998) Utilization of faba bean (Ficia Faba) by-products as feed ingredients for lactating cows. AJAS (Asian J Appl Sci) 11:255–259
Ivarsson E, Grudén M, Södergren J, Hultberg M (2021) Use of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) hulls as substrate for Pleurotus ostreatus – potential for combined mushroom and feed production. J Cleaner Product 313:127969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127969
Edwards DG, Duthie IF, Rogers BM, Owen E (1973) A note on the digestibility by sheep of hulls from the field bean (Vicia faba L.). Anim Sci 17:329–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100017141
Marquardt RR, McKirdy JA, Ward T, Campbell LD (1975) Amino acid, hemagglutinin and trypsin inhibitor levels, and proximate analyses of faba beans (Vicia faba) and faba bean fractions. Can J Anim Sci 55:421–429. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas75-051
Nigus A, Yusuf M, Animut G (2015) Determination of digestibility of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) hull and wheat bran in Afar sheep. J Biol Agric Healthcare 5:186–191
Saharan K, Khetarpaul N, Bishnoi S (2001) Effect of dehulling, soaking and germination on nutrient composition of rice bean and faba bean. Haryana Agric Univ J Res 31:35–40
Saldanha do Carmo C, Silventoinen P, Nordgård CT, Poudroux C, Dessev T, Zobel H, Holtekjølen AK, Draget KI, Holopainen-Mantila U, Knutsen SH, Sahlstrøm S et al (2020) Is dehulling of peas and faba beans necessary prior to dry fractionation for the production of protein- and starch-rich fractions? Impact on physical properties, chemical composition and techno-functional properties. J Food Eng 278:109937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.109937
Youssef MM, Bushuk W, Murray ED, Zillman R, El-Tabey Shehata AM (1982) Relationship between cookability and some chemical and physical properties of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). J Food Sci 47:5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb05014.x
Hashemi Z, Ebrahimzadeh MA (2014) Evaluation of three methods for the extraction of antioxidants from Vicia faba L. bean and hulls. LAAR 44:203–208. https://doi.org/10.52292/j.laar.2014.442
Troszyńska A, Bednarska A, Łatosz A, Kozłowska H (1997) Polyphenolic compounds in the seed coat of legume seeds. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 6(47):38–45
Sinha SK, Kumar A (2018) Condensed tannin: a major anti-nutritional constituent of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). HIJ 2:2. https://doi.org/10.15406/hij.2018.02.00022
Chung KT, Wong TY, Wei CI, Huang YW, Lin Y (1998) Tannins and human health: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 38:421–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408699891274273
Sharma K, Kumar V, Kaur J, Tanwar B, Goyal A, Sharma R, Gat Y, Kumar A (2019) Health effects, sources, utilization and safety of tannins: a critical review. Toxin Rev 40:432–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15569543.2019.1662813
Korish M (2015) Faba bean hulls as a potential source of pectin. J Food Sci Technol 52:6061–6066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1688-9
Ma X, Chen W, Yan T, Wang D, Hou F, Miao S, Liu D (2020) Comparison of citrus pectin and apple pectin in conjugation with soy protein isolate (SPI) under controlled dry-heating conditions. Food Chem 309:125501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125501
Freitas CMP, Coimbra JSR, Souza VGL, Sousa RCS (2021) Structure and applications of pectin in food, biomedical, and pharmaceutical industry: a review. Coatings 11:922. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11080922
Shams R, Masih D, Ashraf G, Dar AH, Rizvi Q-UH (2020) Microwave assisted extraction of pectin from dried hull of faba bean. J Postharvest Technol 08:13–22
Elsebaie EM, Elmahdy A, El-Gezawy ES, Badr MR, Asker GA, El-Gawish AM, Essa RY (2022) Effects of faba bean hull nanoparticles on physical properties, protein and lipid oxidation, colour degradation, and microbiological stability of burgers under refrigerated storage. Antioxidants 11:938. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11050938
Kaya E, Yılmaz Tuncel N, Tuncel NB (2018) Utilization of lentil, pea, and faba bean hulls in Turkish noodle production. J Food Sci Technol 55:1734–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-018-3086-1
Daliani D, Stott S, Fiore A, Cottin S (2019) The effect of the enrichment of bread with fibres from fava bean husk by-products on postprandial satiety response and palatability. Proc Nutr Soc 78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002966511900079X
Szymandera-Buszka K, Gumienna M, Jędrusek-Golińska A, Waszkowiak K, Hęś M, Szwengiel A, Gramza-Michałowska A (2021) Innovative application of phytochemicals from fermented legumes and spices/herbs added in extruded snacks. Nutrients 13:4538. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124538
Vilariño M, Métayer JP, Crépon K, Duc G (2009) Effects of varying vicine, convicine and tannin contents of faba bean seeds (Vicia faba L.) on nutritional values for broiler chicken. Anim Feed Sci Technol 150:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.08.001
Ortiz LT, Centeno C, Treviño J (1993) Tannins in faba bean seeds: effects on the digestion of protein and amino acids in growing chicks. Anim Feed Sci Technol 41:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90002-2
Przywitowski M, Mikulski D, Jankowski J, Juśkiewicz J, Mikulska M, Zdunczyk Z (2017) The effect of varying levels of high- and low-tannin faba bean (Vicia faba L.) seeds on gastrointestinal function and growth performance in turkeys. J Anim Feed Sci 26:257–265. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/75443/2017
Treviño J, Ortiz L, Centeno C (1992) Effect of tannins from faba beans (Vicia faba) on the digestion of starch by growing chicks. Anim Feed Sci Technol 37:345–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(92)90017-Z
Longstaff M, McNab JM (1991) The inhibitory effects of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acids, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. Br J Nutr 65:199–216. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19910081
Van der Meulen J, Panneman H, Jansman A (2010) Effect of pea, pea hulls, faba beans and faba bean hulls on the ileal microbial composition in weaned piglets. Livest Sci 133:135–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.06.045
Gouamid M, Ouahrani MR, Bensaci MB (2013) Adsorption equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics of methylene blue from aqueous solutions using date palm leaves. Energy Procedia 36:898–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.103
Nouri S (2002) Effect of treatment on the adsorption capacity of activated carbon. Adsorpt Sci Technol 20:917–925. https://doi.org/10.1260/02636170260555822
Nahali L, Miyah Y, Mejbar F, Benjelloun M, Assila O, Fahoul Y, Nenov V, Zerrouq F (2022) Assessment of brilliant green and eriochrome black T dyes adsorption onto fava bean peels: kinetics, isotherms and regeneration study. DWT 245:255–269. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2022.27945
Hameed BH, El-Khaiary MI (2008) Sorption kinetics and isotherm studies of a cationic dye using agricultural waste: broad bean peels. J Hazard Mater 154:639–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.081
Bayomie OS, Kandeel H, Shoeib T, Yang H, Youssef N, El-Sayed MMH (2020) Novel approach for effective removal of methylene blue dye from water using fava bean peel waste. Sci Rep 10:7824. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64727-5
Hameed BH, Din ATM, Ahmad AL (2007) Adsorption of methylene blue onto bamboo-based activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 141:819–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.049
Calvete T, Lima EC, Cardoso NF, Dias SLP, Ribeiro ES (2010) Removal of brilliant green dye from aqueous solutions using home made activated carbons. Clean: Soil, Air, Water 38:521–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000027
de Luna MDG, Flores ED, Genuino DAD, Futalan CM, Wan M-W (2013) Adsorption of Eriochrome Black T (EBT) dye using activated carbon prepared from waste rice hulls—optimization, isotherm and kinetic studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.010
Almhana NM, Ali SAK, Al-Najjar SZ, Al-Sharify ZT (2020) Assessment of cobalt ions removal in synthetic wastewater using broad bean peels. J Green Eng 10:11.
Abbas M, Kaddour S, Trari M (2014) Kinetic and equilibrium studies of cobalt adsorption on apricot stone activated carbon. J Ind Eng Chem 20:745–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.06.030
Ismal ÖE, Yıldırım L (2020) An overview of faba bean: utilisation of husks in natural dyeing. IJCST 32:188–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-02-2019-0014
Omar S, Girgis B, Taha F (2003) Carbonaceous materials from seed hulls for bleaching of vegetable oils. Food Res Int 36:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00102-3
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funding was provided by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme through the project “Realising Dynamic Value Chains for Underutilised Crops” (RADIANT), Grant Agreement No. 101000622.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Lina Krenz: Conceptualization, methodology, writing, reviewing, and editing. Sandra Grebenteuch: Writing, reviewing, and editing. Kathleen Zocher: Writing, reviewing, and editing. Sascha Rohn: Writing, reviewing, and editing. Daniel Pleissner: Conceptualization, writing, reviewing, and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
The authors declare their interest to submit to BCAB.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Fava bean by-products were identified as valuable raw materials for utilization.
• Transformation of by-products into valuable products was investigated.
• Wholistic utilization of by-products to foster the bioeconomy is possible.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Krenz, L.M.M., Grebenteuch, S., Zocher, K. et al. Valorization of faba bean (Vicia faba) by-products. Biomass Conv. Bioref. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03779-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03779-9