Abstract
Purpose
To study the organic production in two varieties of Linum (Linseed) crop using different proportions of vermicomposts and combination of vermiwash as an environment friendly substitute to chemical fertilizers for organic farming of Linseed.
Method
Vermicompost prepared from cattle dung was mixed in different proportions, i.e. 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100% vermicompost v/v with soil and commercial potting media (Perlite, Peat and Coconut coir). To study the germination, vegetative growth, reproductive growth and yield in two varieties of Linum usitassimum L. LC-54 and LC-2063 were grown in a polyhouse for a 2 years trial. A total of 960 seedlings and 240 plants were studied for assessment of result in 24 treatments. Additional treatments with foliar application of 1:1 v/v vermiwash and recommended dose of inorganic fertilizer were done to determine and compare the role of vermicompost, vermiwash and inorganic treatment.
Results
Substituting soil with 60% (v/v) vermicompost in LC-54 and with 40% (v/v) vermicompost in LC-2063 improved the performance of seeds, root morphology and stem growth. Life cycle of crop was shortened in two varieties of Linseed raised under different treatments of vermicompost and vermiwash. Performance of LC-54 was better at 60% and that of LC-2063 was at 40%, which can be attributed to their genotypic differences. Vermicompost proportion above 60% was of no use at any stage of life cycle in both the varieties of Linum. Germination and yield were further improved when foliar application of vermiwash was integrated with vermicompost for nutrient management when compared with recommended chemical fertilizer treatment and control.
Conclusion
Bio-efficacy of vermicompost and vermiwash for production of organic Linseed crop has been well established with enhanced yield.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Organic foods have recently gained importance in developed, as well as developing countries with the growing awareness about adverse effects of agricultural chemicals on human health. Demand for organic food has increased worldwide which has led to increased interest in organic agriculture (Follet et al. 1981; Sinha et al. 2009). Crops with a label of ‘organically grown’ fetch much higher value to farmers in domestic and international market (Lim et al. 2015; Crowder and Reganold 2015). Organic agriculture also promotes ecological conservation due to sustainable use of natural resources (Reganold et al. 1993; Letourneau and Goldstein 2001; Mäder et al. 2002). In cultivation of organically grown crops, chemical usage is excluded at all stages so organic agriculture broadly provides the dual benefit of soil quality improvement and chemical free organic foods (Gomiero et al. 2008). Currently many studies are being done to establish vermicompost as one of the preferred organic substitute to chemical fertilizers (Sinha and Valani 2009; Adhikary 2012). During vermicomposting, earthworms carry out the non thermophilic transformation of organic waste with the accelerated microbial decomposition and humification (Atiyeh et al. 2001). Vermicomposting being a biotechnological extension of composting, produces harmless, simple and stable organic end product, i.e. vermicompost.
There has been tremendous research focussing on the effects of vermicompost on soil condition and plant growth (Atiyeh et al. 2000a, b; Gutiérrez-Miceli et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2008; Roy et al. 2010; Joshi et al. 2013, 2015). Many studies have reflected the great potential of vermicompost in horticultural and agricultural practices in field or as a substitute in medium for plant growth in greenhouses and nurseries. Various studies have confirmed the beneficial effects of vermicompost on seed germination, seedling growth and plant productivity, but the effect of vermicompost has been unique and specific on various plant species and varieties, so it becomes utmost important to investigate the genus specific suitability of the vermicompost before its beneficial effects are predicted for a crop plant (Roy et al. 2010). Even the same rate or ratio of vermicompost application has shown different effects on different varieties of same plant (Zaller 2007; Lazcano and Domínguez 2010).
India is among top five countries producing Linseed, with U.K and Canada being top two countries, and still India imports Linseed. In India, currently Linseed occupies 468.0 thousand ha with productivity of 3490 hectogram’s/ha (www.pdkv.ac.in). Linseed is an oilseed crop grown mainly in Punjab (India) in regions of Gurdaspur, Jalandhar, Hoshiarpur and Ropar. Recent statistics show that Linseed has a production of 0.1 thousand tonnes in Punjab state with average yield of 8.0 quintal per hectare. There is a scope to increase the covered area and yield of cultivating Linseed in India (Table 1).
Linseed (Linum usitassimum L.) belongs to the family Linaceae. It is an herbaceous plant grown in winter season in India as a Rabi crop and is sown in first fortnight of October. It grows well in drained silt loamy to clayey soil. Crop is ready for harvest in April. Linseed is the oldest oil and fibre yielding crop. Every part of, Linseed plant has commercial value (Jhala and Hall Linda 2010). The characteristics of Linseed plant are given in Table 2. The present study was designed to establish the practices in organic Linseed farming with following objectives (a) to reveal the impact, suitability, efficacy of vermicompost application on the growth and productivity potential of two regional varieties of a commercially important medicinal plant Linum usitassimum (b) to optimise the application rate of vermicompost considering genotype differences of each variety of foresaid oilseed crop (c) to compare the effect of vermicompost and inorganic fertilizer on growth and yield of Linseed (d) to study impact of integrating vermiwash with vermicompost as integrated nutrient management (INM) on Ontogenic development, i.e. seed germination and seedling growth in soil mix and in commercial potting media mix (d) to know positive effect on seedling and vegetative growth, if any, is congruently shown on reproductive growth of Linum plants in terms of flowering, fruiting and seed setting in various treatments.
Materials and methods
Procurement of Linum seed, vermicompost and vermiwash
Certified seeds of two varieties of Linum usitatisimum, i.e. LC-54 (LV1) and LC-2063 (LV2) were procured from Punjab Agricultural University (PAU), Ludhiana (Punjab), India. Both are lodging resistant varieties of Linseed. LC-54 (LV1) is a latest release with brown seeds and white flowers and is recommended in Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Haryana. LC-2063 (LV2) is high yielding tall variety with golden brown bold seeds, profuse branching, and blue flowers. Both the varieties have average life cycle of 160 days.
Vermicompost prepared from cattle dung was procured from Mahavir Farm, Phillaur, and Punjab. Vermiwash was prepared by earthworm secretion, siphoned as the seepage drain from the worm bed and was kept in earthen pots. 100 ml Vermiwash was diluted with water to prepare (1:1 v/v) foliar spray. Soil was taken from the land which was not cultivated since 5 years.
Physico-chemical properties of vermicompost, vermiwash and soil were analysed for pH, Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Calcium (Ca), and heavy metals (Mn, Cu, Zn). pH, was measured using PCSTestr 35 series Digital meter. Nitrogen was estimated by the method of Bremner and Mulvaney (1982). Method of John (1970) was used for measuring phosphorus. Potassium and calcium were analysed by Systronics Flame Photometer-128. Heavy metals analysis was also measured by method of APHA (2012) using AAS Thermofisher iCE 300. Physico-chemical characteristics of vermicompost, vermiwash and soil are given in Table 3.
Experimental site
The experiment was conducted at Department of Horticulture, Jalandhar Cantt, Punjab (India) with Latitude/longitude: 31°38′11″N 74°52′29″E and at altitude 218 m above mean sea level. The mean maximum and minimum temperatures were 45.5 and 4 °C, respectively. The mean annual rainfall is 649 mm, distributed over 120 rainy days. Relative humidity range was 78–96%.
Experimental lay out
Experiment was set up at a polyhouse in germination trays and pots for 2 years trial during Oct–April 2014–15 and 2015–16. Seeds of both the varieties were hand sown in mid October.
Germination trays
To determine the germination indices for twelve replicates of six treatments, vermicompost (v/v) was mixed in different proportions 0% (G 0), 20% (G 20), 40% (G 40), 60% (G 60), 80% (G 80), and 100% (G 100) with soil. To understand and compare the impact of vermiwash and inorganic fertilizer, two more treatments were set up, i.e. 50% vermicompost (v/v) supplemented with foliar spray of vermiwash (G vw) and inorganic treatment (G inor) to the soil. To compare the effectiveness of vermicompost in substituting commercial potting media, eight more treatments were prepared, i.e. vermicompost was mixed with commercial media in proportion of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% in treatments G CM0, G CM20, G CM40, G CM60, G CM80 and G CM100. In treatment G CMvw, vermicompost and commercial media mix was supplied with vermiwash and in G CMinor, chemical fertilizer was applied and germination trays were filled with 20 ml of mixed substrate as per treatments in Table 4. Composition of commercial media consisted of 35% limed peat moss, 35% perlite and 30% coconut coir, procured from a local nursery. Totally, 16 treatments with 12 replicates were used for germination studies. Seed germination and seedling growth were studied up to 5 weeks after sowing seeds in germination trays. Plant sampling was done at 21 days after sowing (DAS), for morpho-physiological studies, and five randomly selected seedlings from twelve replicates of all the 16 treatments were uprooted from germination trays having vermicompost and soil mix; vermicompost and commercial potting mix. At 35 DAS, all the seedlings under treatment in cell plug trays were uprooted for study. To obtain the sample, the root was cut from the root collar and watered with gentle deionised water spray using a sieve below to collect any broken fragment. Root was immersed in graduated cylinder to calculate the root volume. Same sample was used to measure length, fresh and dry root weight. Shoots were also measured for shoot length and fresh shoot weight. Samples were then oven dried at 70 °C to determine the respective dry weights.
Potting studies for complete life cycle
Plantation was done in earthen pots of volume 9.5l (15 cm diameter and 10 cm height) and placed in polyhouse in a complete randomized design with eight treatments in three replicates (Table 4 ). INM (Integrated Nutrient Management), was done in three treatments (G vw, G CMvw and P vw) by combining use of foliar spray of vermiwash with vermicompost application. A comparison of growth parameters was made among plants under inorganic fertilizer treatment, vermicompost treatments, vermiwash treatment and unamended soil. Separate heaps of soil and vermicompost were made, sieved and mixed so as to make vermicompost application dose to be 0, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% (Arancon et al. 2004; Zaller 2006) for treatments P 0, P 20, P 40, P 60, P 80 and P 100. In another two treatments, 50% vermicompost application was integrated with vermiwash (P vw) and inorganic fertilizers (P inor). Four seeds per pot were sown at 5 cm depth. After emergence, seedlings were thinned to two plants per pot. The plants were irrigated, according to the plant water requirement, so as to maintain the moisture up to 60%. Manual weeding was done intermittently. 100 ml of Vermiwash mixed with water (1:1 v/v) was applied fortnightly for first 50 days to the seedlings and then monthly to plants in P vw. Five seedlings from three replicates were randomly selected from pots and uprooted at 35 DAS. At 50 DAS no sample was destroyed and only the features above ground were studied. At 160 DAS, i.e. at the end of life cycle all the plants were uprooted and used as sample for the studies. Phenology of the plants was studied to evaluate the effect of treatments on length of life-cycle of Linseed.
Crop was hand harvested twice. First harvest was done on 128 DAS when 90% of the capsules turned brown and capsule number was counted, second harvest was on 150 DAS. Estimation of unripe green capsule, which would be available for second harvest, was also done. Ratio of ripened to unripened capsules was calculated to know early ripening. Yield (%) in first harvest was calculated to find uniformity in maturity timings. Also the ratios of marketable to non-marketable fruits were also calculated (Atiyeh et al. 2000b) so as to know the effect of different treatments on marketable seed yield. In each of the harvest, malformed and non-marketable fruits were sorted out and counted.
Measurement of plant growth index
Seedling growth is an important indicator for survival and growth of plantlings in field (Thompson 1985).
Morpho-physiological parameters
Test plants both from germination trays and potting experiments were studied. Seedling emergence was assessed daily for allometric growth, up to 35 days after sowing (DAS). Morpho-physiological parameters for shoot length, root length, seedling height, shoot weight, root weight, fresh biomass, dry biomass and root collar diameter were assessed. Branching ratio and biomass accumulation were also studied at 21 and 35 days after seed sowing (DAS). At 50 DAS Plant height stem length and basal area, and dried leaf weight was determined. Plant biomass, root: shoot ratio (by weight) and biomass allocation were also calculated. Dry weight of 50 leaves was taken to estimate photosynthetic productivity with each treatment. Fifty leaves per plant were washed in distilled water, put in paper bags and oven dried at 60 °C for 48 h. Shoot height was measured from root collar to the apex at various DAS. Stem diameter was measured as average taken at three points—slightly above the root collar, apex and median with a calliper. Stem length was taken from the soil level to the apical meristem of plant. First day of branching, flowering, fruiting, seedfill and seed maturity were noted. By submerging roots in a measuring cylinder filled with water, root volume (cm3) was measured. Plant samples were dried in oven at 70 °C for 48 for dry weight of shoot and root. At 160 DAS, Plant height, weight, capsule number per plant, capsule weight, number of seeds per capsule and seed weight per plant was taken. Marketable yield was calculated by rejecting malformed fruits which were without rattling sound. Mean capsule weight was calculated from total fruit weight of each treatment. Fruits were thrashed to obtain seeds. Data was pooled from all replicates to calculate average yield per plant.
Germination indices
Total germination (Final germination percentage-G) and T 50
It is most widely used index and shows germination capacity of seeds under specific treatment.
where N T is proportion of seeds germinated at each treatment for last time; N is total number of seeds used.
T 50 = T 50 is the number of days or time when half of the total seeds have germinated (Josep and Maria 2002).
Speed of emergence (S.E)
Speed of germination considers the number of seeds germinated between two exposure times
\({\text{S}} . {\text{E}} = \left( {N_{1} \times 1} \right) + \left( {N_{2} - N_{1} } \right)\frac{1}{2} + \left( {N_{3} - N_{2} } \right)\frac{1}{3} \quad \quad + \ldots \, \ldots \,\left( {N_{n} - N_{n - 1} } \right)\frac{1}{n};\) where Proportion of germinated seeds observed at first, second, third……… (n – 1), (n) days or hours (Bradbeer 1988; Wardle et al. 1991).
Germination index (G.I)
where RSG is relative seed germination in percentage; RRG is relative root growth in percentage (Zucconi et al. 1981; Tiquia 2010).
where N GT is no. of seeds germinated in treatment; N GC is the no. of seeds germinated in control (Tiquia 2010).
where RlT is mean root length in treatment; RlC is mean root length in control.
Seedling vigour index (S.V.I)
\({\text{S}} . {\text{V}} . {\text{I }} = \frac{{{\text{Sl}} \times G\% }}{100}\) where Sl is seedling length and G is Total seed germination in percentage (Abdul-Baki and Anderson 1973).
Branching ratio (B R)
It is the ratio of total number of plants and number of plants having branches. Branching ratio of 1:1 shows that all plants in a given treatment have started developing branches at a given time.
where N is total no. of plants; N B is no. of plants having branches at a given time.
Yield indices
Fruit weight/100 capsule
where W TNF is weight of total number of fruits obtained from a treatment; N TF is total number of fruits obtained in same treatment.
Harvest index (H.I)
Harvest index (H.I) is the ratio of economic yield and biological yield taken in percentage.
where W f is the fruit weight (economic yield) and W s (biological yield) is weight of dry stem (Donald and Hamblin 1976).
Statistical analysis
Experiment was run in triplicate and One-way ANOVA was used to calculate the differences among various treatments. Tukey’s test at a level of 5% of probability was applied between different treatments. Student’s paired t test was applied to evaluate differences between two varieties of plants. Statistical analysis was done with the help of Assistat 7.7 beta version and Minitab version 14.0 computer software programs.
Results and discussion
Comparison of germination indices in different treatments with vermicompost, commercial potting media (CPM) and vermiwash
All the treatments G 40, G 60, G 80, G 100, and G vw, supported the total seed germination when compared with control and G inor. Even the low dose of vermicompost application in soil has improved the total seed germination in G 20 by 13.8% in LV1 and 37.8% in LV2, whereas 13.1 and 15.4% increase was observed in both varieties in G CM20 (Fig. 1). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between two varieties of plants when treated with soil and commercial media mixed with vermicompost. The 20% dosage of vermicompost when mixed in soil reduced half time of germination up to 58% in LV1 and 37% in LV2 and further increase in vermicompost dosage showed no improvement in seed germination.
Speed of seedling emergence (S.E) in different treatment showed significant differences (p < 0.05) for both the varieties when compared with vermicompost (G 60, G 80, G 100), vermiwash (G vw) and inorganic fertilizer (G inor) but showed no significant difference (p > 0.05) within soil treatment of two varieties. Speed of seedling emergence was highest in G 60, G CM20 in LV1 (8.8) and G CM20, G 40 in LV2 (8.5). Usage of foliar spray of vermiwash in Combination with 50% vermicompost have further shown qualitatively healthy early maturing seedlings, it can be attributed to availability of higher nitrogen content (Chaoui et al. 2003). Relative root growth in both the varieties increased with increasing proportion of vermicompost in soil, as well as Commercial Potting media but not in 100% vermicompost application and inorganic treatment. Relative root growth has been higher in treatments G 60, G CM60; G 80, G CM80; G vw G CMvw. Highest germination index was achieved with application of 60, 80% vermicompost in soil and 80% vermicompost in commercial potting media in LV1 and LV2, respectively. The seedling vigour index (S.V.I) showed significant difference (p < 0.05) and was highest with dosage of 60% v/v vermicompost, irrespective of substrate being soil or commercial potting media (Table 5). Substituting soil and commercial potting media with vermicompost show comparable S.V.I and Germination Index (G.I) in treatments G 20 and G CM20; G 40 and G CM40; G 60 and G CM60; G vw and G CMvw. Results indicated that the role of vermiwash and vermicompost as potting media can be no less than commercial potting media.
Scope of vermicompost to be used as an alternative to commercial potting substrates or peat is indicated in present study of germination indices. Vermicompost substitution in commercial potting media and soil showed no negative effect on Linum seed germination in all proportions, so vermicompost can be used to replace the expensive commercial potting media partially or whole. Similar results have been put forth by Atiyeh et al. (1999, 2000a, 2001) using pig manure as container media. Replacing vermicompost with commercial potting media would reduce substrate cost in nurseries thus in turn reducing peat harvesting from wetlands. Ievinsh (2011) reported that application of more than 50% vermicompost, inhibited seed germination in radish, cabbage, swedish turnip, beet root, beans and peas. Contrary to this, in present study, germination rate of Linum varieties was not negatively affected by increasing the proportion of vermicompost in soil. Even 100% vermicompost did not inhibit the seed germination but seedlings showed lower, relative root growth, S.V.I and biomass at 21 DAS, It can be due to excessive micro and macro nutrients in plant tissues. The concentration of nutrients in plant tissues have been shown to be directly proportional to the concentration of nutrients in medium (Truong and Wang 2015). Atiyeh et al. (2000b) also reported similar results that 100% vermicompost caused tomato seedling to be relatively short, with few leaves and lesser weight.
The morpho-physiological parameters of seedling were compared and analysed in all the treatments at different DAS. Till 21 days after sowing (DAS), shoot length and seedling length increases with increase in vermicompost proportion up to 60% dosage, with highest values of shoot length being (7.23 ± 0.042) mm in LC-54 and (6.48 ± 0.113) mm in LC-2063 (Table 6). Similar pattern has been observed for root length of both varieties. Shoot length in treatment with vermiwash was comparable for LV1 (6.27 ± 0.156) mm and LV2 (5.95 ± 0.049) mm. Tall seedlings are believed to be genetically superior (Nienstaedt 1981; Campbell and Sorensen 1984) as height of seedling shows its physiological status. Height and stem diameter of seedling are a measure of field survival and field performance (Mullin and Svaton 1972).
Vegetative growth
Vermicompost application has been proved to be efficient in promoting the root formation, plant height and plant biomass as observed in many horticultural plants (Singh et al. 2008). At 35 DAS root collar diameter was maximum in the plants sprayed with vermiwash (2.15 ± 0.07) in LV1 and (1.91 ± 0.05) and in LV2. This indicates the role of foliar spray of vermiwash in promoting root growth. Fresh and dry biomass of the seedling of LV1 and LV2 was highest in plants treated with vermiwash, that is, 3.34 ± 0.01 g, 3.27 ± 0.01 g and 0.35 ± 0.05 g, 0.34 ± 0.01 g, respectively, when compared with 60% vermicompost in both the varieties that is 2.9 ± 0.27 g, 2.8 ± 0.15 g in LV1 and 0.328 ± 0.01 g, 0.113 ± 0.01 g in LV2.
Plants treated with chemical fertilizer showed thinner stems and less deep root system as compared to vermicompost. Beyond 60% dosage of vermicompost showed no further increase in shoot length, root length, shoot weight, root weight and stem diameter at 50 DAS (Table 6). With the application of greater proportions of vermicompost, the plant growth parameters have not improved, this is in accordance with studies done by Subler et al. (1998) so higher doses of vermicompost had detrimental effects on Linseed plants after 35 days of sowing, which may be attributed to higher ammonium content disrupting the mechanism of nutrient absorption through plant roots (Atiyeh et al. 2000a).
At harvest, plants treated with foliar spray of vermiwash had shorter shoot length with high stem basal area than the plants treated with 60% vermicompost in LV1 and 40% vermicompost in LV2. Vermiwash-treated plants had extensive root system with greater root volume and root length, whereas plants treated with chemical fertilisers had weak, thin and poorly branched root system. These results are in corroboration with the studies done by Lazcano et al. (2009). Enhanced root growth parameters can be attributed to the presence of humic acid in vermicompost and vermiwash. Humic acids have been known to enhance root growth (Tallini et al. 1991) and nutrient uptake by increasing the root cell membrane permeability (Valdrighi et al. 1996).
At low to moderate concentrations of vermicompost increased vegetative and reproductive growth is due to appropriate modification of physico-chemical and microbiological status of growing medium. This is in accordance with the studies of Truong and Wang (2015) on tomato seedlings. Optimized dosage of vermicompost was 20% in French marigold seedlings (Bachman and Metzger 2008), up to 60% of cattle manure vermicompost in Petunia (Arancon et al. 2008), 40% of vermicompost in green house peppers(Arancon et al. 2004) and below 50% in tomato (Atiyeh et al. 2000b; Hashemimajd et al. 2006). Though some studies have also shown the best plant performance from 50 to 100% (Lazcano et al. 2009).
There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between biomass allocation and branching ratio in soil and commercial media. Higher branching ratio at 35 days showed the potential of the plantling for higher fruiting and seed setting. Branching in both the varieties is up to third order, i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary being up to 35, 20 and 5 cm long, respectively. There was great variation in branching pattern and number in all treatments (Table 7). The treatment with vermicompost and vermiwash (P vw) showed bushier appearance of plants with branching up to fifth order. Profuse branching is directly correlated to the crop yield in Linseed. Plants treated with 40–60% vermicompost and with vermiwash treatment had started early and uniform branching in all the plants, by vermicompost substitution both in soil or commercial potting media, which clearly signifies the role of vermicompost in promoting vegetative growth. Interestingly, at harvest the highest fruits were also obtained in same treatments, i.e. with 40–60% dosage of vermicompost and vermiwash application.
In both the varieties, plants provided with vermicompost gave better results than that supplemented with the inorganic fertilisers. All the replicates treated with vermicompost and vermiwash had relatively uniform growth pattern than the plants treated with inorganic fertilisers. Although, the nutrients are sufficiently provided in the inorganic treatment but better growth with vermicompost may be attributed to presence of unique mesophylic bacteria, fungi and worm secretions in vermicompost. This signifies that vermicompost is not all about nutritional enrichment but involvement of richer microbial, enzymatic activity of soil and plant growth regulators (Subler et al. 1998; Zaller 2006).
Vermicompost seems to promote nutrient absorption, so the plant with higher doses of vermicompost show relatively poor growth likely due to excessive nutrient absorption and toxicity; reduced aeration and porosity of medium; absorption of heavy metal and excessive phytotoxic substances; and excessive humic acid (Sani 2014). Combination of vermicompost and foliar spray of vermiwash presented better growth till flowering and fruiting stage due to frequent supplementation and foliar absorption of the vermiwash (Khan et al. 2014).Vermiwash has also been proven to replenish the deficiency of potassium and phosphorus in Tomato seedlings (Arthur et al. 2012). Plants treated with foliar spray of vermiwash and vermicompost were consistently been observed to have shorter height and sturdier basal area than the plants treated with 40 or 60% vermicompost till the completion of the study in both the varieties. Sturdier plants proved to be an added advantage to the crop till maturity. Till harvest, shoot length, root length, root weight, shoot weight, plant biomass and biomass accumulation was appreciably high in P vw in both the varieties, in the studies conducted in both years.
Flowering, fruiting and yields
Two varieties respond significantly (p < 0.05) during flowering and seedfill stage. Results explain that foliar application of vermiwash has shortened the lifecycle of Linseed plant, thus favouring farmers (Table 8). Vermiwash also caused early ripening of capsules and early browning of stems and leaves. Leaf stages, flowering, fruit maturity was earlier achieved in P vw (15, 106.5 and 130 days) than in control P 0 (18.5, 128, 148 days) in LV1, whereas in LV2 earliest stages were achieved in P vw (13.5, 114.5 and 135 days) than in control (17, 121.5 and 144 days). Foliar application of vermiwash during seedfill and seed maturity stage seemed to be non-significant but fruit yield was higher in P vw may be due to the previous applications of vermiwash. Variety of LV1 had delayed flowering and fruiting than LV2 which can be attributed to genotypic differences in two varieties. The varied effects of vermicompost among different varieties of same genus indicate the role of genotype in specific response to any organic amendment (Zaller 2007; Lazcano et al. 2010) as some varieties may be more sensitive and better responding at specific dosage.
Plants treated with the combination of 50% vermicompost and a foliar spray of vermiwash (P vw) turned out to be the highest yielding plants with more branches, higher number of capsules, highest plant dry weight and maximum number of seeds (Table 9). Positive effects of vermiwash in this study coincide with results from Gutierrez-miceli et al. (2008) and Tejada et al. (2008).Vermiwash is believed to contain plant growth hormones, enzymes and vitamins from earthworm-associated microbes (Suthar 2010).Vermiwash promotes plant growth by physical amelioration of substrate and influencing nutrient uptake mechanism (Alvarez and Grigera 2005).
The percentage of capsule number in P vw is 49.35, 45.51% higher than P inor and 138.72, 95.5% higher than P 0 in LV1 and LV2, respectively (Table 9). During plant growth, initially the root growth is fast but later on, flower, fruit and seed become the sink of plant resources. Leaf weight was consistently high in P vw indicating high photosynthetic efficiency with foliar application of vermiwash. Thus, greater fruit and seed number in P VW is resultant of increased photosynthetic efficiency of the plant with vermiwash treatments. Total capsule number in P vw was 4.04% higher than in P 40 in LV1 and 3.8% higher in LV2 than P 60, in both the trials. Maximum fruit yield in numbers was obtained in Pvw in first harvest after 128 DAS. In second harvest, fruit yield was very low in treatment with vermiwash in both the varieties. The highest yield of fruit (%) in first harvest of both varieties in P vw (93.97 ± 1.93, 95.27 ± 0.84) shows even and uniform ripening of the fruit when fruit yield in first and second harvest was compared. It suggests the uniform maturation and fruit ripening is achieved with foliar spray of vermiwash.
Average seed number per capsule was highest being 7.58 in first trial and 7.3 in second trial in LV1 and was 7.25 and 7.05 in LV2 in treatment with vermiwash. With inorganic treatment, seed number per capsule in P inor was 5.66, 5.5 and 5.88, 5.95 in two trials of both varieties, respectively. Maximum seed yield (in g/plant) was obtained in P vw in LV1 and LV2 followed by P 40 in LV1 and P 60 in LV2. High capsule number and seed yield in treatments P vw can be attributed to extensive and profusely branched root system. Harvest index in LV1 in P vw is (66.75 ± 0.661) and in LV2 is (57.56 ± 0.751), which is comparable to P 40 in LV1 and P 60 in LV2 and is 60.3, 34.97% higher than P inor in both varieties. Even the application of low doses, i.e. 20% vermicompost has significantly enhanced the capsule number per plant (82.4% more in LV1, 64.1% in LV2), Fruit ripening (212% in LV1, 185.5% in LV2), yield in first harvest (26.8% in LV1, 34.2% in LV2), seed yield (56.2% in LV1, 39.1% in LV2) and H.I (29.7% in LV1, 26.6% in LV2) when compared with control P 0.
Furthermore, the foliar applications of vermiwash reduced the incidence of capsule malformation. This relatively healthier, higher yield and a lesser malformed fruit incidence can be attributed to the presence of certain micro-nutrient as calcium, magnesium, manganese, copper, boron, iron, amino acids and silicic acid in vermiwash (Jarecki et al. 2005).Yield of the Linseed oil from the crop is positively co-related to the seed number and the seed weight per capsule per plant. Thus, high seed and capsule number will increase gains from Linseed. Organically grown Linseed in no way has negative effect on farming economics, as the positive increase in marketable yield is there in organic Linseed production.
In Linseed, the dry weight of stem at harvest is of great importance as linen fibre is commercially obtained from its retted stems. Plant biomass at harvest is highest in P vw (19.82 ± 0.269)g in LV1 and (20.455 ± 0.559)g in LV2. High plant biomass (g) is obtained in P 20 (16.99 ± 0.021) in LV1 and (17.65 ± 0.445) in LV2, P 40 (18.03 ± 0.134) in LV1 and (19.54 ± 0.410) in LV2. P 60 (18.38 ± 0.474) in LV1,(18.96 ± 0.09) in LV2 is comparable with that of P inor. Biomass allocation reflects the shift of plant resources which may be due to availability of nutrients in the micro environment. In the present study, in treatment P vw, Biomass accumulation has shifted more to root from 35 DAS (0.507 ± 0.001; 0.449 ± 0.033) to harvest (0.115 ± 0.067; 0.107 ± 0.056) in LV1 and LV2 which is likely to cause better nutrient absorption and hence higher harvest indices.
Vermicompost and vermiwash application may have provided certain resistance to plants by indirectly affecting the pathogens (Edwards et al. 2004) or due to bacteria and fungi in vermicompost (Szczech 1999). No fungicide or pesticide was used in the present study rather no need was felt at any point of trial as there was no incidence of disease manifestation in the crop probably due to the pesticidal and nematicidal properties of vermicompost (Edwards et al. 2004, 2006).
Conclusion
The present study indicates that vermicompost is an environmentally friendly substitute in organic agriculture and have shown beneficial effects with 40–60% as optimum proportion in LC-54 and in LC-2063 varieties of Linum. Application of vermicompost has positively enhanced growth of both vegetative and reproductive phase of the plant. The yield of Linseed in current pilot study under organic agriculture was more than inorganic treatment, reflecting the scope of organic production of Linseed. Foliar application of the 50% vermicompost and vermiwash had synergistic effect in Linum plant. Vermiwash application has shortened the life cycle of Linum and improved the growth parameters like stem diameter, root volume, branching ratio, biomass allocation, fruit weight, average seed number per capsule by improving the physico-chemical, biological and microbial properties of the growing medium; by improving the nutrient absorption through roots and foliar absorption of vermiwash. Yield and performance of LC -54 was better than LC-2063 under vermicompost regime. The consistently different response of two varieties of Linum at different doses in both the trials showed that LV1 is more responsive even at relatively lower doses. Thus, improved plant growth parameters and higher yield obtained with vermicompost alone and integrated with foliar application of vermiwash opens new vistas for organic Linseed production.
References
Abdul-Baki AA, Anderson JD (1973) Vigour determination of soybean seed by multiple criteria. Crop Sci 13:630–633
Adhikary S (2012) Vermicompost, the story of organic gold: a review. Agric Sci 3:905–917
Alvarez R, Grigera S (2005) Analysis of soil fertility and management effects on yields of wheat and corn in the rolling Pampa of Argentina. J Agron Crop Sci 191:321–329
APHA (2012) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 22nd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Atiyeh R, Metzger JD (2004) Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresour Technol 93:139–144
Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Babenko A, Cannon J, Galvis P, Metzger JD (2008) Influences of vermicomposts, produced by earthworms and microorganisms from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste, on the germination, growth and flowering of Petunias in the greenhouse. Appl Soil Ecol 39:91–99
Arthur GD, Aremu OA, Kulkarni MG, Van Staden J (2012) Vermicompost leachate alleviates deficiency of phosphorus and potassium in tomato seedlings. Hortic Sci 47:1304–1307
Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (1999) Growth of tomato plants in horticultural media amended with vermicompost. Pedobiologia 43:724–728
Atiyeh RM, Subler S, Edwards CA, Bachman G, Metzger JD, Shuster W (2000a) Effects of vermicomposts and compost on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia 44:579–590
Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2000b) Influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Bioresour Technol 75:175–180
Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD (2001) Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticultural bedding plant medium: effects on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresour Technol 78:11–20
Bachman GR, Metzger JD (2008) Growth of bedding plants in potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresour Technol 99:3155–3161
Bradbeer JW (1988) Seed dormancy and germination. Blackie, Glasgow
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982) Nitrogen—total. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chem Microbiol Prop:595–624
Campbell RK, Sorensen FC (1984) Genetic implications of nursery practices. Forestry nursery manual: production of bareroot seedlings. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 183–191
Chaoui HI, Zibilske LM, Ohno T (2003) Effects of earthworm casts and compost on soil microbial activity and plant nutrient availability. Soil Biol Biochem 35:295–302
Crowder DW, Reganold JP (2015) Financial competitiveness of organic agriculture on a global scale. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7611–7616
Donald CM, Hamblin J (1976) The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv Agron 28:361–405
Edwards CA, Domínguez J, Arancon NQ (2004) The influence of vermicomposts on plant growth and pest incidence. In: Shakir SH, Mikhaïl WZA (eds). Soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st century, Cairo, pp 397–420
Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Greytak S (2006) Effects of vermicompost teas on plant growth and disease. Biocycle 47:28–31
Follet R, Donahue R, Murphy L (1981) Soil and soil amendments. Prentice hall Inc, New Jersey
Gomiero T, Paoletti MG, Pimentel D (2008) Energy and environmental issues in organic and conventional agriculture. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:239–254
Gutierrez-Miceli FA, Gracia-Gomez RC, Rincon RR, Abud-Archila M, Maria-Angela OL, Gullin-Cruz MJ, Dendooven L (2008) Formulation of liquid fertilizer for Sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench) using vermicompost leachate. Bioresour Technol 99:6174–6180
Gutiérrez-Miceli FA, Santiago-Boraz J, Molina JAM, Nafate CC, Abdul-Archila M, Llaven MAO, Rincón-Rosales R, Dendooven L (2007) Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Bioresour Technol 98:2781–2786
Hashemimajd K, Kalbasi M, Golchin A, Shariatmadari H (2006) Comparison of vermicompost and composts as potting media for growth of tomatoes. J Plant Nutr 27:1107–1123
Ievinsh G (2011) Vermicompost treatment differentially affects seed germination, seedling growth and physiological status of vegetable crop species. Plant Growth Regul 65:169–181
Jarecki MK, Chong C, Voroney RP (2005) Evaluation of compost leachates for plant growth in hydroponic culture. J Plant Nutr 28:651–667
Jhala AJ, Hall Linda M (2010) Flax (Linum usitatisimum L.): current uses and future applications. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 4:4304–4312
John MK (1970) Colorimetric determination of phosphorus in soil and plant material with ascorbic acid. Soil Sci 109:214–220
Josep AR, Maria M (2002) Seed germination and reproductive features of Lysimachia minoricensis (Primulaceae), a Wild-extinct Plant. Ann Bot 89:559–562
Joshi R, Vig AP, Singh J (2013) Vermicompost as soil supplement to enhance growth, yield and quality of Triticum aestivum L.: a field study. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 2:2–7
Joshi R, Singh J, Vig AP (2015) Vermicompost as an effective organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent: effect on growth, yield and quality of plants. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14:137–159
Khan MH, Meghvansi MK, Gupta R, Veer V, Singh L, Kalita MC (2014) Foliar spray with vermiwash modifies the arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency and nutrient stoichiometry of Bhut Jolokia (Capsicum assamicum). PLoS ONE 9:e92318. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092318
Lazcano C, Domínguez J (2010) Effects of vermicompost as a potting amendment of two commercially-grown ornamental plant species. Span J Agric Res 8:1260–1270
Lazcano C, Arnold J, Tato A, Zaller JG, Domínguez J (2009) Compost and vermicompost as nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology. Span J Agric Res 7:944–951
Lazcano C, Sampedro L, Zas R, Domínguez J (2010) Vermicompost enhances germination of the maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). New For 39:387–400
Letourneau DK, Goldstein B (2001) Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in California. J Appl Ecol 38:557–570
Lim SL, Wu TY, Lim PN, Shak KP (2015) The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics. J Sci Food Agr 95:1143–1156
Mäder P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697
Mullin RE, Svaton J (1972) A grading study with white spruce nursery stock. Commonw For Rev 51:62–69
Nienstaedt H (1981) “Super” spruce seedlings continue superior growth for 18 years. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Reganold JP, Palmer AS, Lockhart JC, Macgregor AN (1993) Soil quality and financial performance on biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344–349
Roy S, Arunachalam K, Dutta BK, Arunachalam A (2010) Effect of organic amendments of soil on growth and productivity of three common crops viz. Zea mays, Phaseolus vulgaris and Abelmoschus esculentus. Appl Soil Ecol 45:76–84
Sani B (2014) Foliar application of humic acid on plant height in Canola. APCBEE Procedia 8:82–86
Singh R, Sharma RR, Kumar S, Gupta RK, Patil RT (2008) Vermicompost substitution influences growth, physiological disorders, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Bioresour Technol 99:8507–8511
Sinha RK, Valani D (2009) Agronomic studies of earthworms and vermicompost vis-à-vis conventional cow dung compost and chemical fertilizers on tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum). Vermiculture Project of School of Engineering (Environment), Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
Sinha RK, Herat S, Valani D, Chauhan K (2009) Vermiculture and sustainable agriculture. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 5(S):1–55
Subler S, Edwards C, Metzger J (1998) Comparing composts and vermicomposts. Biocycle 39:63–66
Suthar S (2010) Evidence of plant hormone like substances in vermiwash: an ecologically safe option of synthetic chemicals for sustainable farming. Ecol Eng 36:1089–1092
Szczech MM (1999) Suppressiveness of vermicompost against Fusarium wilt of tomato. J Phytopathol 147:155–161
Tallini M, Bertoni LA, Traversim ML (1991) Effect of humic acids on growth and biomass partitioning of container growth olive plants. Acta Hortic 294:75–80
Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT, Garcia C (2008) Agricultural use of leachates obtained from two different vermicomposting processes. Bioresour Technol 99:6228–6232
Thompson BE (1985) Seedling morphological evaluation-what you can tell by looking. In: Duryea ML (ed) Proceedings: evaluating seedling quality: principles, procedures, and predictive ability of major tests. Workshop held 16-18 October, 1984. Forestry Research Laboratory, Oregon State University, Corvallis, pp 59–71
Tiquia SM (2010) Reduction of compost phytotoxicity during the process of decomposition. Chemosphere 79:506–512
Truong HD, Wang CH (2015) Effects of different combination of vermicompost on growth, yield, and fruit quality of two tomato varieties under greenhouse conditions. J Agric Sci 7(11). doi:10.5539/jas.v7n11p216
Valdrighi MM, Pera A, Agnolucci M, Frassineti S, Lunardi D, Vallini G (1996) Effect of compost-derived humic acids on vegetable biomass production and microbial growth within a plant (Cichoriumintybus)—soil system: a comparative study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 58:133–144
Wardle DA, Ahmed M, Nicholson KS (1991) Allelopathic influence of nodding thistle (Carduus nutans L.) seeds on germination and radicle growth of pasture plants. N Z J Agric Res 34:185–191
https://www.pdkv.ac.in/?s=linseed&x=0&y=0#sthash.BQPNc6yb.dpbs
Zaller JG (2006) Foliar spraying of vermicompost extracts: effects on fruit quality and indications for late-blight suppression of field-grown tomatoes. Biol Agric Hortic 24:165–180
Zaller JG (2007) Vermicompost in seedling potting media can affect germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit quality of three tomato varieties. Eur J Soil Biol 43:S332–S336
Zucconi F, Forte M, Monaco A, De-Bertoldi M (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. Biocycle 22:27–29
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Department of Applied Sciences, Punjab Technical University, Kapurthala, Punjab (India) and Department of Zoology, Khalsa College, Amritsar (India) for providing necessary lab facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Makkar, C., Singh, J. & Parkash, C. Vermicompost and vermiwash as supplement to improve seedling, plant growth and yield in Linum usitassimum L. for organic agriculture. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 6, 203–218 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0168-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0168-4