Abstract
Purpose
Improving the nutritional value of rice straw by microbial inoculants and some physical treatments for animal feeding during dry seasons.
Methods
Different microbial inoculants and some physical treatments were used to improve the nutritional value of rice straw. Rice straw was divided into moist straw, soaked straw for 24 h without pasteurization and soaked for 24 h and pasteurized at 100 °C/1 h, and all of them were inoculated with different microbial inoculants.
Results
Moistened rice straw inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae recorded the highest significant reduction in organic matter percent, 74.21%. The highest significant reductions in crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber percent were recorded in moistened rice straw inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Saccharomyces cerevisiae which gave 27.54, 55.39 and 42.47%, respectively. The highest significant increase in crude protein percent, 13.71%, was recorded in rice straw soaked for 24 h and inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus megaterium. The combined interaction between microbial treatments and physical pretreatments of rice straw gave a significant decrease in organic matter, crude fiber, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber %, as well as a significant increase in crude protein % compared to control. Addition of nitrogen fixers to rice straw improved its nitrogen contents.
Conclusions
This study showed the possibility of improving the nutritional value of rice straw using microbial inoculants and some physical treatments to produce safe and cheap animal feeds.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Generally, open-field burning of rice straw after harvesting is a conventional method of rice straw disposal in many rice-based countries (Trinh et al. 2017). However, rice straw could be considered an important feeding material during dry seasons when the availability of pasture decreases and other feeds are inadequate. Rice straw is characterized by low digestibility, low protein content, poor palatability, high bulkiness and low mineral content which discourages its use as the sole source of feed for ruminants (Van Soest 2006). Several investigations have been documented on the use of mechanical, physical, chemical and biological treatments as pretreatments for rice straw, to ameliorate its consumption by ruminants (Liu and Ørskov 2000; Selim et al. 2004). The main goal of any pretreatment is to modify or remove any component which acts as a barrier, to improve digestibility, enhance the hydrolytic enzymes and improve the C/N ratio of the straw (Hendriks and Zeeman 2009). When biomass is exposed to pretreatment, several operations, such as the increase in the surface area and porosity, modification of the lignin structure, removal of lignin, partial depolymerization of hemicellulose and reduction of cellulose crystallinity, can also be accomplished (Loow et al. 2015, 2016).
Most of the researches reported that by supplementing rice straw with protein or nitrogenous compounds, the degradability of rice straw, animal intake, milk yield and meat yield can be enhanced when compared with those feeding on untreated rice straw (Wanapat et al. 2009). High costs of chemical nitrogenous materials restrict their use in proper amounts, causing obstruct in animal feeding and production. In addition, the urea is lost through different mechanisms which cause environmental pollution problems (Choudhury and Kennedy 2005). The utilization of biological nitrogen fixation technology can decrease the use of urea-N and reduce environmental pollution (Choudhury and Kennedy 2004).
Solid-state fermentation is a microbial growth method used to enhance the nutritive value of agricultural by-products to be used as animal feed (Iluyemi et al. 2006). Microorganisms selected for solid-state fermentation should have the capability to produce sufficient quantity of appropriate enzymes that are able to degrade the cellulose and hemicellulose in the substrate. Recent attention has been devoted to the values of Pleurotus eryngii, Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus circulans and other microorganisms as cellulase producers (Xu et al. 2005). Saccharomyces cerevisiae has the ability to produce polyamines, which strongly improve the protein content in the by-products (Srinorakutara et al. 2006; Ubalua 2007).
The objective of this investigation is to illustrate a novel in vitro study on the effect of using different microbial inoculants either separately or in combination on the quality and nutritional value of rice straw subjected to different physical treatments to be used as animal fodder.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
Samples of rice straw were collected from a unit of Experimental and Agricultural Research Faculty of Agriculture Ain Shams University. Air-dried rice straw was chopped into 3–5 cm, then packed and used.
Experimental design and treatments
The experiment was designed as a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement in complete randomized design (CRD) with six replicates for each treatment. Factor A was the N2 fixers (with and without N2 fixers “Azotobacter chroococcum and Azospirillum brasilense”), factor B was the microbial treatments which were either cellulose decomposers or polyamines producers or control (untreated) and factor C was the effect of different physical treatments (moist rice straw, soaked rice straw for 24 h and soaked for 24 h then pasteurized at 100 °C/1 h.)
Solid-state fermentation of rice straw was carried out in a 500 ml jar. 20 g rice straw was put in each jar. The jars were plugged with cotton wool. Each jar was inoculated with 5 ml from each inoculum containing 108 CFU/ml, either from the bacterial inoculant or yeast, and 1 g fresh weight from the fungal inoculant. The jars were incubated at 25–30 °C for 4 weeks. At the end of the experiment, rice straw samples were oven dried at 65 °C until a constant weight and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C for chemical determination.
Microorganism
Five different microorganisms were used in this study, namely Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum brasilense, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus circulans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pleurotus eryngii. All of them were obtained from the Unit of biofertilizers, Fac., Agric., Ain Shams University.
The strains were maintained on their appropriate media. Azotobacter chroococcum was cultivated in modified Ashby’s broth medium (Abd‐el‐Malek and Ishac 1968) for 7 days/30 °C, Azospirillum brasilense was cultivated in Dobereiner’s medium (Dobereiner et al. 1976) for 7 days/30 °C, Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus circulans were cultivated in nutrient broth medium (Jacobs and Gerstein 1960) for 24 h/30 °C, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was cultivated in glucose broth medium for 24 h/30 °C and Pleurotus eryngii was cultivated in potato dextrose broth medium at 25 °C for 7 days.
Assessment of some metabolic activities of the selected strains
All the strains were examined for the following activities:
Cellulase activity was determined by the dinitrosalicylic acid method (DNS) according to Miller (1959). One cellulase unit is defined as the amount of enzyme that reducing sugar at the rate of 1 µ mol ml−1 min−1 under assay condition. Nitrogenase activities of the selected strains were determined according to the method described by Mollica et al. (1985). Cytokinins, indole acetic acid and gibberellic acid were determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) according to the method described by Tien et al. (1979).
Chemical analysis
Dry matter, organic matter (OM), crude fiber (CF) and total nitrogen (TN) content in rice straw were determined by the standard methods described by Horwitz (2000). The amount of crude protein (CP) was calculated (Nx6.25). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined by the detergent system as described by Van Soest et al. (1991). All the data was recorded on dry matter basis.
Statistical analysis
The obtained data were statistically analyzed according to statistical analysis system (Littell et al. 2002). Separation between means was carried out using least significant difference (LSD) test. The collected data were also statistically analyzed according the following model: Y ij = μ + T i + e ij , where y ij is the represents observation, μ is the overall mean, T i is the effect of treatment (experimental group) and e ij is the experimental error.
Results and discussion
Assessment of some metabolic activities of selected strains
Considerable variations were recorded among the tested strains regarding their capabilities for cellulase, nitrogenase activities, as well as cytokinins, indole acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellic acid production (Table 1). Data show that Azotobacter chroococcum, Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus circulans were able to fix atmospheric nitrogen and the highest nitrogenase activity was obtained with Azotobacter chroococcum, 133.9 μmol C2H4 ml−1 h−1. These results are in agreement with that reported by (Zayed 2012). The strains of Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus circulans and Pleurotus eryngii were able to produce cellulase enzyme and the highest cellulase activity was obtained with Bacillus megaterium, which gave 3521.73 μmol min−1. All the strains were able to produce cytokinins, IAA and gibberellins, except Saccharomyces cerevisiae which produced cytokinins and gibberellins only. Saccharomyces cerevisiae recorded the highest production capability of cytokinins, 3.52 µg ml −1, Azospirillum brasilense recorded the highest production capability of IAA, 4.7 µg ml−1, and the highest gibberellic acid was recorded with Pleurotus eryngii, 39.1 µg ml−1. Different researches have reported the ability of microorganisms to produce cytokinins, IAA and gibberellins with different quantities depending on the species of microorganism as well as the growth conditions (Manaf and Zayed 2015; Zayed 2012).
Nutritional value of rice straw as affected by combined interactions between microbial inoculants and physical treatments
The combined interaction between microbial treatments and physical pretreatments of rice straw (Table 2) shows significant decrease in organic matter (OM) % in all treatments when compared with control. Moist rice straw inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum as a nitrogen fixer and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a single cell protein recorded the highest significant reduction in organic matter content of 74.21%.
The crude fiber (CF) % recorded significant reduction in all treatments when compared with the control. The highest significant reduction in CF% was recorded with moist rice straw inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and Saccharomyces cerevisiae of 27.54%.
The crude protein (CP) % recorded significant increment in all treatments when compared with the control. The interaction between nitrogen fixers and microbial treatments either as cellulose decomposers or single cell protein gave significant differences between all treatments in CP%. The highest significant increase,13.71%, in CP% was recorded in rice straw soaked for 24 h and inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense as a nitrogen fixer and Bacillus megaterium as a cellulose decomposer.
Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) % and acid detergent fiber (ADF) % (Table 3) show that combined interaction between microbial treatments and some physical pretreatments of rice straw gave significant reduction in NDF and ADF% in all treatments when compared with the control. Moist rice straw inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense as a nitrogen fixer and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a single cell protein recorded the highest significant reduction in NDF and ADF% and gave 55.39 and 42.46%, respectively. Valdez et al. (2008) recorded great decrease in OM in rice straw, wheat straw and barley straw treated with some microbial inoculants compared to untreated materials. The decrease of CF value and the increase of CP value agree with those reported by Akinfemi et al. (2010). These results were elucidated by different researchers from diverse points of view, as it could be attributed to utilization of rice straw’s carbohydrates (including the CF) by the microbial inoculants as carbon source to produce energy for their growth (El-Ashry et al. 2001). Also, this may be due to the presence of Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp., which are nitrogen fixers as they supply the other microbial inoculants used in the treatments with their allowances from nitrogen that consequently increase their degradation activity and decrease the organic matter through fermentation processes (El-Bordeny et al. 2015). The presence of some other nitrogen fixers in the un-pasteurized straw may lead to an increase in the nitrogen content of the treated straws (Rao and Naik 1990) as well as secretion of extracellular enzymes by the microorganisms inoculated into the treatment during their breakdown of rice straw which are protein substances (Kadiri 1999). All the previous factors decrease the C/N ratio of rice straw, which leads to an improvement in the ability of microbial inoculants as well as the dominant microorganisms in the rice straw to degrade the roughages in the rice straw. Biological treatment of rice straws resulted in reducing the NDF and ADF contents. These findings are in agreement with Mahrous and Abou Ammou (2005). The presence of high concentrations from ADF and NDF in rice straw is responsible for its poor nutritive value and lower digestibility as animal feed, since high concentrations from NDF and ADF could be responsible for low digestibility in animals (Falls et al. 2017; Sath et al. 2012). Reducing the concentration of ADF and NDF in rice straw converted it into more nutritive and easily digestible animal feed (Sharma and Arora 2011). The decrease in CF and CF fractions (NDF, ADF) may be caused due to cellulase enzymes secreted by microbial inoculants (Akinfemi et al. 2010).
Effect of nitrogen fixers on the nutritional quality of rice straw
It is obvious from data recorded in Table 4 that, in general, no significance difference was recorded between all the treatments in the OM, while rice straw inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum recorded the highest significant reduction in CF, NDF and ADF which gave 33.04, 61.08, and 45.68%, respectively. However, in accordance with CP, the highest significant increment, 10.28%, was recorded with rice straw inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense. No significant difference was recorded between rice straw either inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum or Azospirillum brasilense in CF, CP, NDF and ADF. Rice straw is rich in C and poor in N, which limits its degradation process. This high C/N ratio could be decreased by increasing the basal N content of rice straw by adding a nitrogen source which may have originated from non-symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Among the nitrogen fixers, Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp. were selected as they play a key role in harnessing the atmospheric nitrogen through fixation process and converting it into ammonium ion (El-Fattah et al. 2013; Zayed 2012). Also, Ahlawat and Rai (1997) reported that inoculation of mushroom seed spawn substrates with nitrogen fixers increased the growth of P. eous and Agaricus bisporus.
Effect of different microbial inoculants on the nutritional quality of rice straw
It is noticeable from the data recorded in Table 5 that all microbial inoculants gave significant records in all parameters documented when compared with raw rice straw (uninoculated). Rice straw treated with different microbial inoculants recorded significant reduction in OM, CF, NDF and ADF when compared with raw rice straw.
The best significant reduction in OM, 78.94%, was recorded in rice straw treated with Bacillus megaterium, while the best significant reduction in CF, NDF and ADF was recorded in rice straw treated with Pleurotus eryngii and gave 33.34, 61.38 and 45.85%, respectively. No significant difference was recorded between all other treatments in these parameters. Crude protein recorded significant increase in all microbial treatments compared to raw rice straw. The highest significant increment in crude protein, 10.73%, was recorded with rice straw inoculated by Bacillus megaterium, compared to all treatments. Mixed cultures of cellulolytic bacteria or fungi can improve the degradation of rice straw fibers (Silanikove et al. 1988). Yeasts are a group of unicellular fungi which are used as a source of high nutritional value proteins and vitamins and high biomass production, making them a preferable additive to livestock’s feeds (Shridhar 2012). Also, it is safe and resistant to antibiotics, as well as has the ability to produce polyamines, which are compounds that strongly affect cell growth and differentiation (Costalos et al. 2003; McFarland 2007). Also, Valdez et al. (2008) found that the growth of Pleurotus pulmonarius on wheat straw increased the organic matter content and improved the nutritional quality of agricultural by-products to be used as a ruminant feeding.
Effect of moistening, soaking and pasteurization of rice straw on the feeding value of the final product
Clear significant differences between the physical treatments in all the tested parameters were recorded. Moist straw recorded the best significant reduction in the parameters OM, CF, NDF and ADF of 78.01, 32.55, 60.57 and 45.39%, respectively, as well as the highest significant increase in protein content of 10.22% when compared to other treatments (Table 6). During solid-state fermentation of rice straw, the microbial inoculants encounter the presence of some inhibiting compounds in rice straw including low molecular weight organic acids, and phenolic and inorganic compounds. These compounds are released and formed during pretreatment (pasteurization) and/or hydrolysis of the residues (Dashtban et al. 2009). It should be noticed that the significant use of soaking methods is to remove and/or dilute the concentration of the inhibiting compounds that exist in rice straw. Although pasteurization treatments did not give the highest significant data when compared with other treatments, it recorded non-contaminated products which ensure clean and healthy product for animal feed when compared with other treatments.
Conclusions
This investigation elucidates the possibility of improving the nutritional value of rice straw using different microbial inoculants and some physical treatments. The combined inoculation of different microbial inoculant either as nitrogen fixers or cellulose decomposers increased the crude protein percentage and decreased OM, CF, ADF and NDF in rice straw without using chemical compounds to produce safe, non-contaminated and cheap animal feeds. Different microbial inoculants with different enzymatic activities recorded different nutritional values for treated rice straw. Therefore, the type of microbial inoculant that should be used to improve the nutritional value of the roughage could be determined on the basis of the nutritional content of the roughage used as animal feed. Using pasteurization and soaking for treating rice straw prevented its contamination and improved fiber digestion parameters.
References
Abd-el-Malek Y, Ishac YZ (1968) Evaluation of methods used in counting azotobacters. J Appl Bacteriol 31:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1968.tb00367
Ahlawat O, Rai R (1997) Effect of ‘Azotobacter’and ‘Phosphotika’biofertilizers on the spawn-run, pinning and yield of the white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). Mushroom Res 6:69–74
Akinfemi A, Adu O, Doherty F (2010) Conversion of sorghum stover into animal feed with white-rot fungi: Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus pulmonarius. Afr J Biotechnol 9(11):1706–1712
Choudhury AA, Kennedy I (2004) Prospects and potentials for systems of biological nitrogen fixation in sustainable rice production. Biol Fertil Soils 39:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0706-2
Choudhury A, Kennedy I (2005) Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1625–1639. https://doi.org/10.1081/css-200059104
Costalos C, Skouteri V, Gounaris A, Sevastiadou S, Triandafilidou A, Ekonomidou C, Kontaxaki F, Petrochilou V (2003) Enteral feeding of premature infants with Saccharomyces boulardii. Early Hum Dev 74:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-3782(03)00090-2
Dashtban M, Schraft H, Qin W (2009) Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities & perspectives. Int J Biol Sci 5:578–595
Dobereiner J, Marriel I, Nery M (1976) Ecological distribution of Spirillum lipoferum Beijerinck. Can J Microbiol 22:1464–1473. https://doi.org/10.1139/m76-217
El-Ashry M, Kholif A, El-Alamy H, El-Sayed H, El-Hamamsy T (2001) Effect of different yeast cultures supplementation to diet on the productive performance of lactating buffaloes. Egypt J Nutr Feeds 4:21–33
El-Bordeny A Abdou, Badr A, Madkour AMA (2015) Productive and physiological response of Ewe-Lambs fed ration containing bio-upgraded rice straw. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 10:237–246. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2015.237.246
El-Fattah DAA, Eweda WE, Zayed MS, Hassanein MK (2013) Effect of carrier materials, sterilization method, and storage temperature on survival and biological activities of Azotobacter chroococcum inoculant. Ann Agric Sci 58:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.001
Falls M, Meysing D, Lonkar S, Liang C, Karim M, Carstens G, Tedeschi L, Holtzapple M (2017) Development of highly digestible animal feed from lignocellulosic biomass Part 1: oxidative lime pretreatment (OLP) and ball milling of forage sorghum. Transl Anim Sci 1:208–214. https://doi.org/10.2527/tas2017.0024
Hendriks A, Zeeman G (2009) Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Biores Technol 100:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027
Horwitz W (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. vol. C/630.240 O3/2000
Iluyemi F, Hanafi M, Radziah O, Kamarudin M (2006) Fungal solid state culture of palm kernel cake. Bioresour Technol 97:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.03.005
Jacobs MB, Gerstein MJ (1960) Handbook of microbiology. D. Van Nostrand Co. Inc., Princeton
Kadiri M (1999) Changes in intracellular and extracellular enzyme activities of Lentinus subnudus during sporophore development. Biosci Res Commun 11:127–130
Littell RC, Stroup WW, Freund RJ (2002) SAS for linear models. SAS Institute, Cary
Liu J, Ørskov E (2000) Cellulase treatment of untreated and steam pre-treated rice straw effect on in vitro fermentation characteristics. Anim Feed Sci Tech 88:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-8401(00)00218-2
Loow Y-L, Wu TY, Tan KA, Lim YS, Siow LF, Md. Jahim J, Mohammad AW, Teoh WH (2015) Recent advances in the application of inorganic salt pretreatment for transforming lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars. J Agr Food Chem 63:8349–8363. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b01813
Loow Y-L, Wu TY, Jahim JM, Mohammad AW, Teoh WH (2016) Typical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into reducing sugars using dilute acid hydrolysis and alkaline pretreatment. Cellulose 23:1491–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0936-8
Mahrous A, Abou Ammou F (2005) Effect of biological treatments for rice straw on the productive performance of sheep Egypt. J Nutr Feeds 8:529–540
Manaf HH, Zayed MS (2015) Productivity of cowpea as affected by salt stress in presence of endomycorrhizae and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Ann Agric Sci 60:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2015.10.013
McFarland LV (2007) Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler’s diarrhea. Travel Med Infect Di 5:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2005.10.003
Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Mollica ML, Van Elsas J, Penido EG (1985) An improved method to detect acetylene-reducing activity in Bacillus strains. J Microbiol Methods 3:147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(85)90042-9
Rao R, Naik D (1990) Influence of two levels of N & S on the growth and lignolytic ability of Pleurotus ostreatus on wheat and paddy straws. Indian J Anim Nutr 7:71–74
Sath K, Sokun K, Pauly T, Holtenius K (2012) Feed intake, digestibility, and N retention in cattle fed rice straw and para grass combined with different levels of protein derived from cassava foliage. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 25:956. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11482
Selim A, Pan J, Takano T, Suzuki T, Koike S, Kobayashi Y, Tanaka K (2004) Effect of ammonia treatment on physical strength of rice straw, distribution of straw particles and particle-associated bacteria in sheep rumen. Anim Feed Sci Technol 115:117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.01.011
Sharma RK, Arora DS (2011) Biodegradation of paddy straw obtained from different geographic locations by means of Phlebia spp. for animal feed. Biodegradation 22:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9383-7
Shridhar BS (2012) Review: nitrogen fixing microorganisms. Int J Microbiol Res 3:46–52. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijmr.2012.3.1.61103
Silanikove N, Danai O, Levanon D (1988) Composted cotton straw silage as a substrate for Pleurotus sp. cultivation. Biol Wastes 25:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7483(88)90081
Srinorakutara T, Kaewvimol L, L-a Saengow (2006) Approach of cassava waste pretreatments for fuel ethanol production in Thailand. J Sci Res Chula Univ 31:77–84
Tien T, Gaskins M, Hubbell D (1979) Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 37:1016–1024
Trinh TK, Nguyen TT, Nguyen TN, Wu TY, Meharg AA, Nguyen MN (2017) Characterization and dissolution properties of phytolith occluded phosphorus in rice straw. Soil Till Res 171:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.002
Ubalua A (2007) Cassava wastes: treatment options and value addition alternatives. Afr J Biotechnol 6:2065–2073. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb2007.000-2319
Valdez ODM, Flores EOG, García JAM, Chavira JS, Rubio RR, Ortiz J (2008) Use of Pleurotus pulmonarius to change the nutritional quality of wheat straw. I. Effect on chemical composition. Interciencia 33:435–438
Van Soest P (2006) Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality. Anim Feed Sci Technol 130:137–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.01.023
Van Soest PV, Robertson J, Lewis B (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2
Wanapat M, Polyorach S, Boonnop K, Mapato C, Cherdthong A (2009) Effects of treating rice straw with urea or urea and calcium hydroxide upon intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and milk yield of dairy cows. Livest Sci 125:238–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.001
Xu Z-H, Bai Y-L, Xu X, Shi J-S, Tao W-Y (2005) Production of alkali-tolerant cellulase-free xylanase by Pseudomonas sp. WLUN024 with wheat bran as the main substrate. World J Microb 21:575–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-3491-7
Zayed MS (2012) Improvement of growth and nutritional quality of Moringa oleifera using different biofertilizers. Ann Agric Sci 57:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2012.03.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to urisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Zayed, M.S. Enhancement the feeding value of rice straw as animal fodder through microbial inoculants and physical treatments. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 7, 117–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0197-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0197-7