Abstract
Dementia Day Care Centres (DDCCs) are defined as services providing care and rehabilitation to people with dementia associated with behavioural and psychological symptoms (BPSD) in a semi-residential setting. According to available evidence, DDCCs may decrease BPSD, depressive symptoms and caregiver burden. The present position paper reports a consensus of Italian experts of different disciplines regarding DDCCs and includes recommendations about architectural features, requirements of personnel, psychosocial interventions, management of psychoactive drug treatment, prevention and care of geriatric syndromes, and support to family caregivers. DDCCs architectural features should follow specific criteria and address specific needs of people with dementia, supporting independence, safety, and comfort. Staffing should be adequate in size and competence and should be able to implement psychosocial interventions, especially focused on BPSD. Individualized care plan should include prevention and treatment of geriatric syndromes, a targeted vaccination plan for infectious diseases including COVID-19, and adjustment of psychotropic drug treatment, all in cooperation with the general practitioner. Informal caregivers should be involved in the focus of intervention, with the aim of reducing assistance burden and promoting the adaptation to the ever-changing relationship with the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The establishment of Dementia Day Care Centres (DDCCs) dates back to 1979 in the UK [1]. Across the years, several scientific data have supported the use of semi-residential care for people with dementia, despite some limitations such as heterogeneous care models, diverse outcome measures and lack of randomized intervention studies. The large majority of studies showed efficacy in reducing depressive symptoms [2, 3] and behavioural and psychological symptoms in dementia (BPSD) [2,3,4,5,6] as well as in stimulating preserved cognitive abilities [4], although a few less recent studies reported no significant effects [7, 8]. Several studies found that semi-residential care may also represent a valuable support of family caregivers, reducing caregiver burden [2, 3, 9,10,11], although a systematic review on this topic concluded that, taken as a whole, literature data are ambiguous [12].
Several factors may explain the conflicting data, including the number of days/hours the participants attended the DDCC (is some cases only 1–2 days per week). Some patient and caregiver-related factors can limit the frequency of utilization of this service, including perceived loss of autonomy, denial, guilt or economic constraints [13]. Context factors, such as poor availability, social system complexity or lack of adequate information may further decrease the access [13]. The quality and types of psychosocial interventions delivered (the less recent of the cited articles generally used 'low-tech' interventions) also could impact on the results, as well as methodological constraints. Indeed, with these patients, equivalence between the comparison groups is difficult to achieve, and randomization is also often impossible [14]. Moreover, in some studies participants of the control group received some amount of treatment. For example, control caregivers in the study of Zank and Schacke [4] received respite care at home, so they did not meaningfully differ from caregivers using adult day care for their relative.
Semi-residential care can decrease the risk of hospitalization [8], possibly through the prevention of BPSD exacerbations and the monitoring of chronic pathologies and geriatric syndromes. Whether it would also help to postpone the dementia patient's admission to a nursing home is still a matter of debate. Wimo et al. showed that attending a DDCC could avoid or delay permanent institutionalization [7], but other studies did not replicate or even reverse this finding [8, 15, 16]. However, admission to a nursing home may be independent of the patient's condition and the caregiver's stress and may be due to contingencies (e.g. caregiver illness) or to caregiver age (13). Other unmeasured factors such as an increased propensity to institutionalization when the patient starts spending a lot of time away from home might also play a role (15,16). In this respect, the effect might also depend on when the patient enters the DDCC, i.e. whether in the advanced stages of the disease, when the patient is severely impaired or at an earlier stage. In the first case, caregivers may be so burdened that the relief provided by DDCC might actually hasten institutionalization [17].
In Italy, the first experiences of semi-residential care for older subjects date back to the 1980s, with social services dedicated to older subjects with preserved functional autonomy, while the first day care centres for disabled older subjects affected by dementia date back to the 1990s, in the Lombardia, Emilia-Romagna and Toscana regions [18]. The presence of DDCCs has been subsequently included among “Essential levels of assistance” guaranteed by the Italian National Health Service for people with dementia in need of “rehabilitation, reorientation and safeguarding” [19]. With regard to funding, the Italian National Health Service covers the healthcare costs of the service (e.g. nursing, physiotherapy), which represents 50% of the total fee, while social costs (including basic daily care and accommodation) are charged to the person with dementia and his/her family, in proportion to the income, and the remaining share is covered by the municipality [20, 21].
In the present document, DDCCs are defined as semi-residential structures aimed at providing social and health care for a specific target of people with dementia, namely those suffering from clinically significant BPSD who require assistance and rehabilitation approach for a definite period of time. People who attend DDCCs should preferably be able to walk, independently or with assistance.
Since 2011, the “Italian Group on Dementia Day Care Centres”, a multidisciplinary group of professionals involved in geriatric medicine, has been working on drafting an expert consensus on day care for older subjects with dementia [22]. This article presents the recommendations developed by the experts’ panel.
The following chapters include a summary of the guidance regarding different areas of care analysed by the authors, namely care pathway, care environment, requirement of personnel, main psychosocial interventions, use of psychoactive treatment, management of geriatric syndromes, infection prevention, and support to family and caregivers.
Methods
The guidance presented in this article has been developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts including geriatricians, psychiatrists, psychologists, architects, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, social health educators and music therapists. All panellists were professionals with many years of experience in long-term care for dementia and/or experts in research methodology. Multiprofessional subgroups were set up with the aim of searching the literature and developing guidance on specific issues:
-
DDCC definition, norms, and care pathway
-
Physical environment
-
Personnel
-
Psychosocial interventions
-
Drug treatment
-
Geriatric syndromes
-
Caregiver support
The experts were not asked to compulsorily conduct a systematic literature review with specific keywords, because the purpose of the work was not to develop a formal guideline. The proposals from each subgroup were discussed by the entire panel at subsequent meetings on the sidelines of the Italian conference on Alzheimer's day care centres. The work started in 2011 and since then the text has undergone numerous revisions and updates, which were also necessitated by advances in scientific research in this area.
The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic slowed the panel's work and also prompted the addition of specific recommendations on the prevention of infections. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, several DDCCs have also adopted instruments of telecare, including tele-monitoring with information–communication technology techniques and the use of technology to foster social inclusion and provide remote psychosocial and rehabilitative interventions. Although the authors acknowledge the importance of this promising field, they also believe that the available literature is not sufficient yet to provide a guidance on telecare in DDCCs.
Care pathway for dementia day care recipients
The admission to DDCCs should follow an assessment of the patient by a memory clinic [23, 24] and a comprehensive assessment by the healthcare district commission about the appropriateness of admission, which usually decides for a limited (3–6 months), renewable period of attendance. Once the admission is confirmed, an individualized care plan (ICP) is drawn up by the DDCC staff, in agreement with family members and the general practitioner (GP). The ICP includes clinical, social, psycho-affective and functional problems identified during the comprehensive geriatric assessment; identifies the care needs and the strategies to pursue assistance targets; establishes regular checks, aimed at evaluating the results achieved and/or to update objectives or strategies [23, 24].
We recommend that the admission to DDCCs be gradual and preceded by a contact with family members. The ICP must guarantee social inclusion, psychosocial interventions, physical activity and nursing and rehabilitative interventions as needed, to be performed individually or in small groups. If necessary, the discharge from the service can be followed by a home care assistance aimed at facilitating the return at home or the possible transfer to a different long-term care service.
Environment as a therapeutic intervention
DDCCs architectural features should be based on the peculiar needs of people with dementia with the purpose of providing adequate conditions of safety and comfort, supporting their independence, and creating a meaningful and stimulating environment. Scientific evidence supports the significant impact of environment on both health and well-being of people with dementia [25]. Particularly, an adequate living arrangement seems able to reduce the occurrence of behavioural disorders, to maintain preserved functional capacities and to support spatial and temporal orientation. Therefore, the environment could become an important pillar of assistance together with pharmacological and psychosocial treatments [26, 27]. Conversely, unsuitable environmental characteristics can trigger or increase behavioural disorders [28, 29]. An environmental element with a specific psychosocial purpose is represented by therapeutic garden that may help to decrease BPSD [30,31,32]. Moreover, the facility must be provided with an infirmary, in order to enable an adequate first aid in case of sudden injury or illness.
Building design must also take into account the needs of care team to facilitate their work and to reduce physical and emotional burden. The DDCCs should be fully accessible, possibly located within the city centre, next to community meeting places, to foster integration in social context.
Minimal structural requirements of semi-residential services for older subjects with disability include: localization in places easy to reach, to support social inclusion, availability of spaces devoted to socialization and common activities, availability of at least one accessible bathroom for every 10 care recipients and a maximum capacity of 30 care recipients [33]. In keeping with the minimal requirement of 40–45 sq m per resident in residential care services for disabled older adults [34] and subtracting the minimum surface of overnight spaces, we advise a minimum surface area of 25–30 sq m for each day care recipient.
Table 1 summarizes the main design features that should be respected for the realization of the DDCCs, in parallel with specific impairments and needs of people with dementia that should be addressed.
Personnel of DDCCs and their roles
The working group in DDCCs includes social and healthcare personnel, with specific skills in caring for older people with dementia and BPSD, capable of working together as a team. Aims of staff activity include taking care of day care recipients, promoting their interaction with each other, supporting caregivers, maintaining contacts with the socio-cultural entities outside DDCCs and cooperating with local services and GPs.
Minimal organization requirements of semi-residential services for disabled older subjects [33] include the presence of a service coordinator and the predisposition of an ICP for each care recipient. Specific qualifying standards for DDCC include a minimum of 80 min of total assistance per care recipient per day and the availability of nurse, nursing assistant and psychologist [19]. A more recently approved official document [41] includes a list of different professional roles involved in dementia care, whose presence we recommend in a DDCC (Table 2).
The coordinator is responsible for interaction with healthcare district, GPs, local services and family members. The coordinator is also in charge of service organization, administration, monitoring of performance and of quality assurance. The care team as a whole is responsible for drafting and executing the ICP, including the identification of a case coordinator (case manager), who coordinates interventions included in the plan. Personnel included in the care with specific roles and expected workload for a standard (15 care recipients) DDCC are summarized in Table 2 [18, 41, 42].
Psychosocial interventions
Scientific evidence is available supporting the efficacy of psychosocial interventions (PSIs) in reducing cognitive decline and BPSD and in promoting well-being and quality of life of people with dementia and their carers [46,47,48]. PSIs include activities aimed at enhancing preserved abilities and capacities of each patient, reducing social isolation and preserving self-esteem and personal identity [49].
PSIs can be grouped into four categories, according to their focus: cognition and function oriented, behaviour oriented, emotion oriented and sensory stimulation oriented (summarized in Tables 3a, b). Cognition- and function-oriented interventions (Table 3a) are aimed at maintaining cognitive and daily functioning as long as possible [46]. The group of behaviour-, emotion- and sensory stimulation-oriented interventions (Table 3b) has a crucial role for the treatment of BPSDs [50, 51] and should be considered as a first-line treatment in this setting [51], due to limited efficacy and increased risk of adverse events associated with antipsychotics. The evidence currently available on each intervention is summarized in the last column of the tables. All the listed interventions have been shown to have some positive effects, although, for some of them, the results are more uncertain than for others. Thus, all interventions could be delivered to dementia day care recipients, but the choice to apply one of them rather than another also depends on local factors (e.g. centre resources, space, available professionals) and on the preferences and specific requirements of the care recipients.
The proposed activities should be simple and of limited duration, to avoid tiredness or stress; activities should also be person-centred according to stage of illness, needs and wishes of recipients. Therefore, a careful clinical, functional and cognitive assessment is required, coupled with the knowledge of personal history. The effectiveness over time of PSIs should be assessed through validated scales, such as the Neuropsychiatric Inventory [52] and the Cohen–Mansfield Agitation Inventory for behavioural assessment [53]. Moreover, the effects of PSIs on quality of life should be regularly evaluated through a scale validated for the specific level of dementia [54]. Examples of tailored, person-centred interventions are presented in a video recorded at the Monteoliveto Centre in Pistoia (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGeP8nGCMRg).
Drug treatment of BPSD
While PSIs must be considered as the first-line treatment of BPSD, the association of pharmacological interventions has a synergistic effect in improving neuropsychiatric symptoms, especially in long-term care [91]. Pharmacological intervention may be considered in case of severe BPSD unresponsive to non-pharmacological measures and when BPSD entail great suffering or risk [92].
Antipsychotics (APs) are still the therapy with more consistent documentation of efficacy in the short term, but with a risk of serious adverse events, including higher risk of mortality and stroke. Atypical APs are prescribed at least in 25% of patients with dementia [93]; since 2000 their use has been the object of warning about their safety in patients with dementia. In 2008, the warning was extended to typical APs too. The warning issued by the national and international regulatory authorities reports about an increased mortality rate in people with dementia treated with APs, with the risk being even higher with typical in comparison with atypical ones [94]. Therefore, when required, the use of atypical APs is still preferred over typical ones for the treatment of psychosis and aggressive behaviour in DDCCs [92]. Limited evidence is available regarding long-term use of APs. A prolonged treatment may be appropriate for cases with persistent and severe symptoms which show a good clinical response, although an attempt to reduce and eventually discontinue the therapy should be periodically considered [95].
Drug treatments of BPSD alternative to APs include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and trazodone, with citalopram having the strongest evidence for agitation, but with an increased risk of QT prolongation [96]. Other drugs with possible efficacy on BPSD include memantine [97], antiepileptics [98] and ginkgo biloba extract [99]. The use of analgesic drugs has been reported to reduce BPSD in nursing home residents [100].
According to available recommendations [92, 101, 102], psychopharmacological management in DDCCs should include the thorough appraisal of previous drug treatments, the assessment of type, frequency, severity and possible triggers of BPSD using standardized scales (e.g. Neuropsychiatric Inventory) and the possibility of drug de-prescription at admission and of a gradual dose tapering. Monotherapy should be preferred, starting treatment using the minimum effective dose, discontinuing after 2 weeks in the absence of an evident clinical response and attempting the interruption after 4 months in case of efficacy. A careful monitoring of possible adverse events should include the evaluation of new-onset or worsening of parkinsonism, immobilization and fall risk, presence of cardiovascular disease, QTc interval, serum potassium levels and co-occurring prescriptions. Exchange of information with the GP and the memory clinic on this issue is recommended.
Prevention and treatment of geriatric syndromes
Geriatric syndromes are typical conditions of old age, resulting from physiological and pathological changes, with common risk factors, often coexisting in the same person and carrying the risk of worse prognosis [103].
The main geriatric syndromes that can be observed in DDCCs are listed below.
-
Falls are frequent in people with dementia in long-term care and may lead to severe consequences, including fractures, head trauma, hospitalization, institutionalization, worsening disability and depression. Main risk factors for falls include sensory impairments, imbalance, specific drugs and polypharmacy, hypotension and environmental obstacles [104].
-
Delirium is a dysfunction of awareness and attention, with fluctuating course during the day, that develops over a short period of time (hours to days), represents an acute change that cannot be explained by a coexisting neuropsychiatric condition, and is related to an underlying potentially reversible cause (acute medical condition drugs), although being often multifactorial. Delirium is frequent in dementia and should be recognized and differentiated from BPSD in DDCCs [105, 106].
-
Immobilization syndrome is the consequence of interruption or reduction of physical activity [107], due to ageing-associated mobility disability and vulnerability of the organism. In dementia, even minor pathological conditions may limit physical activity.
-
Pressure sores are ischaemic skin lesions caused by immobilization and worsened by malnutrition, urinary/faecal incontinence and peripheral hypoperfusion [108, 109].
-
Urinary incontinence is highly prevalent in dementia and is associated with both psychological (reduction in self-esteem, depression and sleep disturbance), medical consequences (pressure sore risk), and increased care burden and risk of nursing home admission [110, 111].
-
Malnutrition in dementia is typically represented by protein–calorie undernutrition due to low intake of nutrients, potentially leading to loss of muscle mass and strength (sarcopenia) [112] with consequent increased risk of falls and worsening disability, reduced wounds’ healing capacity, weakening of immune response and higher risk of mortality [113].
-
Dysphagia is often associated with neuromotor signs (e.g. parkinsonism) and behavioural symptoms [114] and is typically present in severe stages of dementia. It increases the risk of aspiration pneumonia, dehydration, malnutrition and death [115].
-
Chronic and recurrent pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience and in people with dementia may be the cause of BPSD, such as agitation and aggression [116], and is also associated with the decline of cognitive function and functional status [117].
Table 4 itemizes the assessment tools and types of interventions (treatment and prevention) proposed for each geriatric syndrome.
Vaccinations
Influenza and pneumococcal infections are recognized to be a significant health problem and cause of death, especially in fragile persons such as dementia people in DDCCs [136]. Vaccination is an effective measure to prevent the impact of these infections. Long-Term-Care Committee of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America recommends in long-term care facilities (LTCF) residents should receive vaccination at the beginning of the influenza season unless a contraindication exists or the patient refuses [137, 138]. Moreover, the Society strongly supports influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of all healthcare personnel (HCP), including those who do not provide direct care [139]. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) [140] and herpes zoster [141] vaccinations are also recommended.
Infection prevention: the lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic
In addition to the devastating effects on people's lives, with hundreds of deaths per day in the first phase of the pandemic, since 2020 COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted on the care of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease. A recent review investigated the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on neuropsychiatric symptoms, in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment [142]. Data from 21 studies all around the world showed that symptoms such as depression, anxiety, agitation, irritability and apathy increased in this population during the lockdown, likely due to isolation and loss of services. The COVID-19 confinement also increased caregivers’ stress, independently of the dementia severity [143].
The serious effects of COVID-19 pandemic on both DDCCs users and services clearly emerged in a specific survey conducted in Italy, promoted by the Italian Group on Dementia Day Care Centres (unpublished data). Eighty-one out of 470 centres (private centres, n = 45; public centres, n = 36), mostly in Northern (N = 44) or Central (N = 30) Italy, filled the questionnaire. On the date of the survey (April 2021), 28 centres were still closed due to the pandemic, and 53 had resumed activity after a period of suspension. Among the active centres, only 10% retained the number of care recipients admitted as in the pre-pandemic period, whereas the number was reduced by more than 50%, or less than 50%, in 21 and 24 centres, respectively. Overall, there was a 60% reduction in the number of care recipients. Moreover, several centres had changed the number of days they were open and/or the opening hours.
As well as continuing to provide assistance in situations that require reduced physical contact, day care health workers must maintain their own safety and that of the users. To this purpose, guidelines have been drawn up by scientific societies and health authorities in individual countries [144] that will probably be modified according to the evolution of the pandemic. Specific procedures of containment are recommended, including:
(a) the periodic sanitization of environments;
(b) the identification of a “COVID-manager” for the prevention and control of healthcare-related infections; he/she must be a person, specifically trained for COVID-19, who knows the place of care and its problems according to the type of patients in the facility to observe, prevent and manage critical issues in real time;
(c) the monitoring of own body temperature by all healthcare workers before the start of the work shift, with a ban on entering the facility and starting the shift if a body temperature above 37.5 °C or other symptoms relevant to COVID-19 are detected;
(d) the obligation for caregivers to report the onset of symptoms (fever, cough, respiratory difficulties, anosmia, ageusia, etc.) of both the subject and the other cohabitants before accessing the day care centres;
(e) depending on the characteristics of the care recipients, the possibility of rotating attendance to encourage more people to take part in the activities by extending the opening hours; users can therefore also be organized in two daily shifts (morning and afternoon) according to the preferences expressed by caregivers; social distancing must be guaranteed in the same environment;
(f) the need to follow up remotely care recipients who cannot access the centre, to maintain contact and monitor clinical conditions;
(g) the rescheduling of many internal activities to ensure security; for example, occupational therapy, cognitive stimulation and physiotherapy activities should be carried out in small groups, in large, airy spaces or outdoors, trying to encourage the maintenance of social distance.
Support and training for informal caregivers
Family and caregivers represent the main assistance resource for people with dementia. Over time, care needs gradually intensify, and therefore care modalities should undergo continuous and dynamic changes [145]. Formal caregivers provide professional and paid assistance, while informal caregivers, usually a family member (the spouse and/or children), give assistance voluntarily and for free. The latter experience an emotional and social, as well as physical, burden that can be alleviated by psychosocial and educational interventions [146, 147]. Unfortunately, though widely available in European countries, services of counselling, support and education for informal caregivers of people with dementia are rarely utilized [148].
Gradual personality changes in people with dementia, often resulting in alteration of the relationship with their caregivers, can represent the beginning of a process of atypical or anticipatory mourning for carers [149]. For these reasons, caregivers’ well-being should be cared for, with social support being an important protective factor [150] and specific interventions such as cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT), including grief-specific strategies, should be taken into account [151].
Caregiver education is usually organized as a group activity, aimed at improving the adaptation of carers to assistance needs, establishing a healthy relationship, teaching coping strategies and promoting the interpretation of verbal and non-verbal language [152].
In DDCCs, it is possible to modify the level of caregivers’ stress [2], not only by the relief from daily assistance, but also with the treatment of BPSD and through support, information and training of family members. The working group within DDCCs should take care of family members since the admission to the service. A caregiver assessment should be coupled with patient assessment and includes schooling, work activity, degree of kinship and cohabitation with the patient, other relatives to assist, availability of other formal or informal caregivers, presence of interpersonal conflicts, and the level of physical, emotional and social burden. Care burden should be assessed at admission and reassessed periodically with specific scales, such as the Caregiver Burden Inventory [153]. The interventions offered by DDCCs to families include active listening, individuals or group interventions, education on the characteristics of the disease, including legal issues, support to relational approach at home, management of pharmacological therapy, and adaptation of home environment. During the COVID-19 pandemic, regular telephone contacts and videoconferencing have become common forms of care support, which have been appreciated by caregivers [154], and their use should be maintained by DDCCs, especially for subjects who attend the service only few days per week. Psychotherapy for caregivers may be indicated in selected cases. Moreover, DDCCs can be an appropriate setting to discuss advance care planning for severe stages of the disease [155].
Conclusions
DDCCs should be considered an integral part of the treatment of dementia with behavioural and psychological symptoms, as they provide both psychosocial interventions for affected subjects and support for caregivers. The availability of an adequate physical environment, trained personnel and appropriate care approaches are crucial to attaining the therapeutic goals. The many existing centres in Italy are heterogeneous in terms of architectural features, organization, available professionals and interventions provided. Even most worrying are the inhomogeneous distribution and the overall shortage of such services. This paper is intended as a guide and a support for the organization of DDCCs and possibly for monitoring the quality of care delivered.
References
Arie T (1979) Day care in geriatric psychiatry, 1978. Age Ageing Suppl. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/8.suppl.87
Mossello E, Caleri V, Razzi E et al (2008) Day Care for older dementia patients: favorable effects on behavioral and psychological symptoms and caregiver stress. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:1066–1072. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2034
Logsdon RG, Pike KC, Korte L et al (2016) Memory care and wellness services: efficacy of specialized dementia care in adult day services. Gerontologist 56:318–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu012
Zank S, Schacke C (2002) Evaluation of geriatric day care units: effects on patients and caregivers. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57:348–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/57.4.p348
Dröes RM, Meiland F, Schmitz M et al (2004) Effect of combined support for people with dementia and carers versus regular day care on behaviour and mood of persons with dementia: results from a multi-centre implementation study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 19:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1142
Femia EE, Zarit SH, Stephens MA et al (2007) Impact of adult day services on behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Gerontologist 47:775–788. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/47.6.775
Wimo A, Mattsson B, Adolfsson R et al (1993) Dementia day care and its effects on symptoms and institutionalization–a controlled Swedish study. Scand J Prim Health Care 11:117–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813439308994913
Engedal K (1989) Day care for demented patients in general nursing homes. Effects on admissions to institutions and mental capacity. Scand J Prim Health Care 7:161–166. https://doi.org/10.3109/02813438909087234
Bangerter LR, Liu Y, Kim K et al (2021) Adult day services and dementia caregivers’ daily affect: the role of distress response to behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Aging Ment Health 25:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1681934
Zarit SH, Stephens MA, Townsend A et al (1998) Stress reduction for family caregivers: effects of adult day care use. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 53:S267–S277. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/53b.5.s267
Tretteteig S, Vatne S, Rokstad AM (2017) The influence of day care centres designed for people with dementia on family caregivers – a qualitative study. BMC Geriatr 17:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0403-2
Tretteteig S, Vatne S, Rokstad AM (2016) The influence of day care centres for people with dementia on family caregivers: an integrative review of the literature. Aging Ment Health 20:450–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1023765
Stephan A, Bieber A, Hopper L et al (2018) Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries. BMC Geriatr 18:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1
Zarit SH, Stephens MA, Townsend A et al (2003) Give day care a chance to be effective: a commentary. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/58.3.p195
McCann JJ, Hebert LE, Li Y (2005) The effect of adult day care services on time to nursing home placement in older adults with Alzheimer’s disease. Gerontologist 45:754–763. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/45.6.754
Wattmo C, Wallin AK, Londos E et al (2011) Risk factors for nursing home placement in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study of cognition, ADL, service utilization, and cholinesterase inhibitor treatment. Gerontologist 51:17–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq050
Gaugler JE, Zarit SH (2001) The effectiveness of adult day services for disabled older people. J Aging Soc Policy 12:23–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J031v12n02_03
Pesaresi F (2018) Manuale del centro diurno - Anziani non autosufficienti e anziani affetti da demenza. Maggioli Editore.
Italian National Health Service. National LEA Committee (May 30, 2007). Prestazioni residenziali e semiresidenziali.
Italian Jurisdiction, L. No. 328 (Nov 8, 2000). Legge quadro per la realizzazione del sistema integrato di interventi e servizi sociali.
Italian Ministerial Decree, DM. No. 308 (May 21, 2001). Regolamento concernente "Requisiti minimi strutturali e organizzativi per l’Autorizzazione all’esercizio dei servizi e delle strutture a ciclo residenziale e semi-residenziale, a norma dell'articolo 11 della legge 8 novembre 2000, n. 328”.
Italian Group on Dementia Day Care Centres Available from: www.centridiurnialzheimer.it. Access date 2022 Sept 13.
Presidency of the Council of Ministers Unified Conference. Deliberation 30 October 2014. Piano Nazionale Demenze – Strategie per la promozione ed il miglioramento della qualità e dell’appropriatezza degli interventi assistenziali nel settore delle demenze.
Presidency of the Council of Ministers Unified Conference. Deliberation 26 October 2017. Linee di indirizzo Nazionali sui Percorsi Diagnostico Terapeutici Assistenziali (PDTA) per le demenze.
Del Nord R (2002) Architettura per l’Alzheimer. Edizioni Regione Toscana.
Zanetti O, Metitieri T (2002) La riabilitazione cognitiva e cognitivo-comportamentale nel paziente demente. In: Trabucchi M (ed) Le Demenze, 3rd edn. Utet, Torino, pp 561–583
Cester A, De Vreese LP, Minelli PP et al (2000) Spazio e Ambiente. Vega, Biella
Gollin D, Basso D, Miclwrath J et al (2004) La gestione integrata clinico-ambientale: lo spazio come risorsa terapeutica. G Gerontol 52:490–499
Stabilini F (2006) Design e spazio terapeutico. FinMark, Bologna
Pedrinolla A, Tamburin S, Brasioli A et al (2019) An indoor therapeutic garden for behavioral symptoms in alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Alzheimers Dis 71:813–823. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190394
Detweiler MB, Myers LC (2008) Does a wander garden influence inappropriate behaviors in dementia residents? Am J Alzheimer Dis Other Demen 23:31–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317507309799
Ford Murphy P, Miyazaki Y, Detweiler MB et al (2010) Longitudinal analysis of differential effects on agitation of a therapeutic wander garden for dementia patients based on ambulation ability. Dementia 9:355–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/147130121037533
Italian Welfare Minister Decree n. 307, May 21, 2001. Requisiti minimi strutturali e organizzativi per l'autorizzazione all'esercizio dei servizi e delle strutture a ciclo residenziale e semiresidenziale, a norma dell'articolo 11 della legge 8 novembre 2000, n. 328
Italian Prime Minister Decree, Dec 22, 1989. Atto di indirizzo e coordinamento dell'attività delle regioni e province autonome concernente la realizzazione di strutture sanitarie residenziali per anziani non autosufficienti non assistibili a domicilio o nei servizi semiresidenziali.
Feliciano L, Vore J, LeBlanc LA et al (2004) Decreasing entry into a restricted area using a visual barrier. J Appl Behav Anal 37:107–110. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-107
Chaudhury H, Cooke HA, Cowie H et al (2018) The Influence of the Physical Environment on Residents With Dementia in Long-Term Care Settings: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw259
Cester A (1995) Legare i vecchi. EdUP, Roma
Cester A, Gumirato G (1997) I percorsi della contenzione dal caos al metodo. Vega, Biella.
Tessari A, Cester A (2015) Ruolo del colore nella protesi ambientale: studio sulla percezione dei contrasti cromatici in soggetti con demenza. Proceedings of the 9th conference ISTISAN Congress 15/C6, Il contributo dei centri per i Disturbi Cognitivi e le Demenze nella gestione integrata dei pazienti. Rome, Italy.
Hodges L, Bridge C, Chaudhary K (2006) Dementia Design Guidelines: home and community care capital works program. Sydney: Home Modification Information Clearinghouse, University of Sydney. Available from: http://www.homemods.info. Access date 2020 Sept 13.
Italian Presidency of the Council of Minister, Unified Conference, 2017 Oct 26. Linee di Indirizzo Nazionali sui Percorsi Diagnostico Terapeutici Assistenziali (PDTA) per le demenze.
Decree of the Regional Council of Emilia-Romagna (DGR), No. 514. 2019 Apr 20. Primo provvedimento della Giunta Regionale attuativo dell'art.23 della L.R. 4/2008 in materia di accreditamento dei servizi socio-sanitari. Allegato DF - Centri diurni dedicati alle demenze.
Italian jurisdiction, D. Lgs n. 502 (30 Dec 1992). Riordino della disciplina in materia sanitaria, a norma dell'articolo 1 della legge 23 ottobre 1992, n. 421
Italian jurisdiction, D. Lgs n. 229 (19 Jun 1999). Norme per la razionalizzazione del Servizio sanitario nazionale, a norma dell’articolo 1 della legge 30 novembre 1998, n. 419.
Bökberg C, Ahlström G, Karlsson S et al (2014) Best practice and needs for improvement in the chain of care for persons with dementia in Sweden: a qualitative study based on focus group interviews. BMC Health Serv Res 14:596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0596-z
McDermott O, Charlesworth G, Hogervorst E et al (2019) Psychosocial interventions for people with dementia: a synthesis of systematic reviews. Aging Ment Health 23:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1423031
Scales K, Zimmerman S, Miller SJ (2018) Evidence-based nonpharmacological practices to address behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Gerontologist 58:S88–S102. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx167
Kim SK, Park M (2017) Effectiveness of person-centered care on people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging 12:381–397. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S117637
Liang JH, Xu Y, Lin L et al (2018) Comparison of multiple interventions for older adults with Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment A PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010744
Nickel F, Barth J, Kolominsky-Rabas PL (2018) Health economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions for persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 18:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0751-1
Farlow M, Shamliyan TA (2017) Benefits and harms of atypical antipsychotics for agitation in adults with dementia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 27:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2017.01.002
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K et al (1994) The neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 44:2308–2314. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308
Cohen-Mansfield J (1986) Agitated behaviors in the elderly II. preliminary results in the cognitively deteriorated. J Am Geriatr Soc 4:722–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1986.tb04303.x
Bowling A, Rowe G, Adams S et al (2015) Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales. Aging Ment Health 19:13–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2014.915923
Oltra-Cucarella J, Ferrer-Cascales R, Clare L et al (2018) Differential effects of cognition-focused Interventions for people with Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychology 32:664–679
Regan B, Wells Y, Farrow M et al (2017) MAXCOG-maximizing cognition: a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of goal-oriented cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 25:258–269
Huntley JD, Gould RL, Liu K et al (2015) Do cognitive interventions improve general cognition in dementia? A meta-analysis and meta-regression BMJ Open 5:e005247
Woods B, Aguirre E, Spector AE et al (2012) Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning in people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub2
Forbes D, Forbes SC, Blake CM et al (2015) Exercise programs for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006489.pub4
Brett L, Traynor V, Stapley P (2016) Effects of physical exercise on health and well-being of individuals living with a dementia in nursing homes: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.016
Du Z, Li Y, Li J et al (2018) Physical activity can improve cognition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Interv Aging 13:1593–1603. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S169565
Wang X, Wang H, Ye Z et al (2020) The neurocognitive and BDNF changes of multicomponent exercise for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY) 12:4907–4917. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.102918
López-Ortiz S, Valenzuela PL, Seisdedos MM et al (2021) Exercise interventions in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ageing Res Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101479
Braz de Oliveira MP, Moreira Padovez RFC, Serrão PRMDS et al (2022) Effectiveness of physical exercise at improving functional capacity in older adults living with Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil 16:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2037744
Zhou S, Chen S, Liu X et al (2022) Physical activity improves cognition and activities of daily living in adults with alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:1216. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031216
Li F, Harmer P, Eckstrom E et al (2021) Efficacy of exercise-based interventions in preventing falls among community-dwelling older persons with cognitive impairment: is there enough evidence? an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 50:1557–1568. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab110
Kouloutbani K, Venetsanou F, Markati A et al (2022) The effectiveness of physical exercise interventions in the management of neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia patients: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 34:177–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610221000193
Graff MJ, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Thijssen M et al (2007) Effects of community occupational therapy on quality of life, mood, and health status in dementia patients and their caregivers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 62:1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.9.1002
Laver K, Cumming R, Dyer S et al (2017) Evidence-based occupational therapy for people with dementia and their families: what clinical practice guidelines tell us and implications for practice. Aust Occup Ther J 64:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12309
Gitlin LN, Arthur P, Piersol C et al (2018) Targeting behavioral symptoms and functional decline in dementia: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 66:339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15194
Mohr W, Rädke A, Afi A et al (2021) Key intervention categories to provide person-centered dementia care: a systematic review of person-centered Interventions. J Alzheimers 84:343–366. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210647
Dyer SM, Harrison SL, Laver K et al (2018) An overview of systematic reviews of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 30:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217002344
Jones M. Gentle Care: Changing the experience of Alzhemer’s Disease in a positive way. Burnaby BC; 1996.
Innes A, Hatfield K (2004) Healing Arts Therapies and Persons-Centered Dementia Care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, Bradford Dementia Group Good Practice Guide
Odell-Miller H (2016) The role, function and identity of music therapists in the 21st century, including new research and thinking from a UK perspective. BJMT 30:5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359457516639549
Bruscia KE (1998) Defining Music Therapy, 2nd edn. Barcelona Publishers, Gilsum, NH
Chancellor B, Duncam A, Chatterjee A (2014) Art therapy for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. J Alzheimers Dis 39:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-131295
Pedersen SKA, Andersen PN, Lugo RG et al (2017) Effects of music on agitation in dementia: a meta-analysis. Front Psychol 8:742. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00742
Leggieri M, Thaut MH, Fornazzari L et al (2019) Music intervention approaches for Alzheimer’s disease: a review of the literature. Front Neurosci 13:132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00132
van der Steen JT, Smaling HJ, van der Wouden JC et al (2018) Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub4
Vink A, Hanser S (2018) Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia: a mini-review. Medicines (Basel) 5:109–116. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines5040109
Fusar-Poli L, Bieleninik Ł, Brondino N et al (2018) The effect of music therapy on cognitive functions in patients with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health 22:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1348474
Karkou V, Meekums B (2017) Dance movement therapy for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011022.pub2
Gori G, Zilli I, Pizziolo P (2016) Preliminary results of a research project we initiated at the public day care centre (DCC) for Alzheimer Le Civette in florence. Italy Dual Diagn Open Acc 1:2. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-5048.100026
Delfa-Lobato L, Guàrdia-Olmos J, Feliu-Torruella M et al (2021) Benefits of cultural activities on people with cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.762392
Mossello E, Ridolfi A, Mello AM (2011) Animal-assisted activity and emotional status of patients with Alzheimer’s disease in day care. Int Psychogeriatr 23:899–905. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610211000226
Cantarella A, Borella E, Faggian S et al (2018) Using dolls for therapeutic purposes: a study on nursing home residents with severe dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 33:915–925. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4872
Travers C, Brooks D, Hines S et al (2016) Effectiveness of meaningful occupation interventions for people living with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review. JBI Database Sys Rev Implement Rep 14:163–225. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003230
Ballard C, Corbett A, Orrell M et al (2018) Impact of person-centred care training and person-centred activities on quality of life, agitation, and antipsychotic use in people with dementia living in nursing homes: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002500
Abraha I, Rimland JM, Trotta FM et al (2017) Systematic review of systematic reviews of nonpharmacological interventions to treat behavioural disturbances in older patients with dementia. The SENATOR-OnTop series BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012759
Brodaty H, Arasaratnam C (2012) Meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. Am J Psychiatry 169:946–953. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11101529
Reus VI, Fochtmann LJ, Eyler AE et al (2016) The american psychiatric association practice guideline on the use of antipsychotics to treat agitation or psychosis in patients with dementia. Am J Psychiatry 173:543–546. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.15107
Banerjee S (2009) The use of antipsychotic medication for people with dementia: time for action. http://psychrights.org/research/digest/nlps/banerjeereportongeriatricneurolepticuse.pdf.
Ralph SJ, Espinet AJ (2018) Increased all-cause mortality by antipsychotic drugs: updated review and meta-analysis in dementia and general mental health care. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-170042
Van Leeuwen E, Petrovic M, van Driel ML et al (2018) Withdrawal versus continuation of long-term antipsychotic drug use for behavioural and psychological symptoms in older people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007726.pub3
Henry G, Williamson D, Tampi RR (2011) Efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants in the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, a literature review of evidence. Am J Alzheimer Dis Other Dem 26:169–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317511402051
Ballard CG, Gauthier S, Cummings JL et al (2009) Management of agitation and aggression associated with Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurol 5:245–255. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2009.39
Yeh YC, Ouyang WC (2012) Mood stabilizers for the treatment of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: an update review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 28:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2011.10.025
Savaskan E, Mueller H, Hoerr R et al (2018) Treatment effects of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761 on the spectrum of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Psychogeriatr 30:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217001892
Husebo BS, Ballard C, Sandvik R et al (2011) Efficacy of treating pain to reduce behavioural disturbances in residents of nursing homes with dementia: cluster randomised clinical trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4065
Kales HC, Gitlin LN, Lyketsos CG (2015) Assessment and management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h369
Biagini CA, Bianchetti A, Cembrani F, et al (2014) Il trattamento farmacologico dei sintomi psicologici e comportamentali in corso di demenza: aspetti clinici e medico-giuridici. Psicogeriatria Suppl. 1.
Inouye SK, Studenski S, Tinetti ME et al (2007) Geriatric syndromes: clinical, research and policy implications of a core geriatric concept. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:780–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01156.x
Quigley PA, Campbell RR, Bulat T et al (2012) Incidence and cost of serious fall-related injuries in nursing homes. Clin Nurs Res 21:10–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773811414180
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). 5th edn. Washington DC.
Bellelli G, Morandi A, Di Santo SG et al (2016) “Delirium Day”: a nationwide point prevalence study of delirium in older hospitalized patients using an easy standardized diagnostic tool. BMC Med 14:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0649-8
Hébert R, Roy P (2007) Le syndrome d’immobilisation. In: Arcand M, Hébert R (eds) Précis pratique de gériatrie. Edisem/Maloine, Paris, pp 477–491
Regional Health Council of Tuscany. Ulcere da pressione: prevenzione e trattamento. Linee Guida. 2016. Available from: https://www.regione.toscana.it/-/ulcere-da-pressione-prevenzione-e-trattamento-linea-guida. Access date 2022 Sept 13.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Pressure ulcers: prevention and management. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg179. Access date 2022 Sept 13.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation Sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10052
Offermans MP, Du Moulin MF, Hamers JP et al (2009) Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated risk factors in nursing home residents: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 28:288–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20668
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J et al (2019) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 48:16–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169
Volkert D, Beck AM, Cederholm T et al (2022) ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin Nutr 41:958–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2022.01.024
Gilmore-Bykovskyi AL, Rogus-Pulia N (2018) Temporal associations between caregiving approach, behavioral symptoms and observable indicators of aspiration in nursing home residents with dementia. J Nutr Health Aging 22:400–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0943-y
Payne M, Morley JE (2018) Editorial: dysphagia, dementia and frailty. J Nutr Health Aging 22:562–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-018-1033-5
Cohen-Mansfield J, Lipson S (2008) The utility of pain assessment for analgesic use in persons with dementia. Pain 134:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2007.03.023
Scherder EJ, Eggermont L, Plooij B (2008) Relationship between chronic pain and cognition in cognitively intact older persons and in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The need to control for mood. Gerontology 54:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113216
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Falls in older people: assessing risk and prevention 2013. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg161. Access date 2022 Oct 10.
Ries JD, Hutson J, Maralit LA et al (2015) Group balance training specifically designed for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease: impact on berg balance scale, timed up and go, gait speed, and mini-mental state examination. J Geriatr Phys Ther 38:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000030
Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA et al (1990) Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. a new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 113:941–948. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941
Lees R, Corbet S, Johnston C et al (2013) Test accuracy of short screening tests for diagnosis of delirium or cognitive impairment in an acute stroke unit setting. Stroke 44:3078–3083. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001724
Oh ES, Fong TG, Hshieh TT et al (2017) Delirium in older persons: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA 318:1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.12067
Coleman S, Nixon J, Keen J et al (2014) A new pressure ulcer conceptual framework. J Adv Nurs 70:2222–2234. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12405
Wagg A, Gibson W, Ostaszkiewicz J et al (2015) Urinary incontinence in frail elderly persons: report from the 5th international consultation on incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 34:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22602
Eustice S, Roe B, Paterson J (2000) Prompted voiding for the management of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002113
Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD et al (2010) Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:625–663. https://doi.org/10.1086/650482
Schaap LA, Quirke T, Wijnhoven HAH et al (2018) Changes in body mass index and mid-upper arm circumference in relation to all-cause mortality in older adults. Clin Nutr 37:2252–2259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.11.004
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ (1996) Assessing the nutritional status of the elderly: the mini nutritional assessment as part of the geriatric evaluation. Nutr Rev 54:S59-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1996.tb03793.x
Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D et al (2004) Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the “Malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST)” for adults. Br J Nutr 92:799–808. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn20041258
Tully MW, Matrakas KL, Muir J et al (1997) The Eating behavior scale. a simple method of assessing functional ability in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol Nurs 23:9–15. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-19970701-08
Dunne TE, Neargarder SA, Cipolloni PB (2004) Visual contrast enhances food and liquid intake in advanced Alzheimer’s disease. Clin Nutr 23:533–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2003.09.015
Wu HS, Lin LC, Wu SC et al (2014) The effectiveness of spaced retrieval combined with montessori-based activities in improving the eating ability of residents with dementia. J Adv Nurs 70:1891–1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12352
Rofes L, Arreola V, Almirall J et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of oropharyngeal dysphagia and its nutritional and respiratory complications in the elderly. Gastroenterol Res Pract. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/818979
Baijens LW, Clavé P, Cras P et al (2016) European society for swallowing disorders - European union geriatric medicine society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging 11:1403–1428. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S107750
Mosele M, Inelmen EM, Toffanello ED et al (2012) Psychometric properties of the pain assessment in advanced dementia scale compared to self assessment of pain in elderly patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 34:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341582
Ridda I, Dastouri F, King C et al (2014) Vaccination of older adults with dementia against respiratory infections. Infect Disord Drug Targets 14:133–139. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871526514666140713153645
Bradley SF (1999) Prevention of influenza in long-term-care facilities. long-term-care committee of the society for healthcare epidemiology of America. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:629–637. https://doi.org/10.1086/501687
Nace DA, Archbald-Pannone LR, Ashraf MS (2017) Pneumococcal vaccination guidance for nursing home residents: recommendations from AMDA infection advisory committee. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.010
Frentzel E, Jump RLP, Archbald-Pannone L et al (2020) Recommendations for mandatory influenza vaccinations for health care personnel from AMDA’s infection advisory subcommittee. J Am Med Dir Assoc 21:25–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.008
W.H.O. (2022) Global Covid-19 Vaccination Strategy in a Changing World. Jul 2022 update.
Dooling KL, Guo A, Patel M et al (2018) Recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices for use of herpes zoster vaccines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67:103–108
Soysal P, Smith L, Trott M et al (2022) The Effects of COVID-19 lockdown on neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychogeriatrics 22:402–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12810
Cohen G, Russo MJ, Campos JA (2020) Living with dementia: increased level of caregiver stress in times of COVID-19. Int Psychogeriatr 32:1377–1381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220001593
Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Rapporto ISS COVID-19 n. 61/2020 - Indicazioni ad interim per un appropriato sostegno alle persone con demenza nell’attuale scenario della pandemia di COVID-19.
Moore KJ, Lee CY, Sampson EL et al (2019) Do interventions that include education on dementia progression improve knowledge, mental health and burden of family carers? A systematic review Dementia (London) 19:2555–2581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301219831530
Jensen M, Agbata IN, Canavan M et al (2015) Effectiveness of educational interventions for informal caregivers of individuals with dementia residing in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 30:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4208
Gilhooly KJ, Gilhooly ML, Sullivan MP et al (2016) A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving. BMC Geriatr 16:106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8
Lethin C, Leino-Kilpi H, Roe B et al (2016) Formal support for informal caregivers to older persons with dementia through the course of the disease: an exploratory, cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 29:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0210-9
Chan D, Livingston G, Jones L et al (2013) Grief reactions in dementia carers: a systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 28:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3795
Moore KJ, Crawley S, Vickerstaff V et al (2020) Is preparation for end of life associated with pre-death grief in caregivers of people with dementia? Int Psychogeriatr 32:753–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610220000289
Meichsner F, Wilz G (2018) Dementia caregivers’ coping with pre-death grief: effects of a CBT-based intervention. Aging Ment Health 22:218–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1247428
Lai CKY, Chung JCC (2007) Caregivers’ informational needs on dementia and dementia care. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2:78–87
Novak M, Guest C (1989) Application of a multidimensional caregiver burden inventory. Gerontologist 29:798–803. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/29.6.798
Chirico I, Ottoboni G, Giebel C et al (2022) COVID-19 and community-based care services: experiences of people living with dementia and their informal carers in Italy. Health Soc Care Community 30:e3128–e3137. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13758
Italian Jurisdiction, L. No. 219 (Dec 22, 2017). Norme in materia di consenso informato e di disposizioni anticipate di trattamento
Funding
Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Firenze within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This work was supported by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Pistoia e Pescia, Pistoia, Italy. The sponsor had no role in the design and writing of the paper and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Statement of human and animal rights
The paper does not include any research with human participants or animals directly performed by the authors.
Informed consent
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mossello, E., Baccini, M., Caramelli, F. et al. Italian guidance on Dementia Day Care Centres: A position paper. Aging Clin Exp Res 35, 729–744 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02356-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02356-4