Abstract
Purpose
We compared the prevalence of COVID-19 and related mortality in nursing homes (NHs) in 14 countries until October 2021. We explored the relationship between COVID-19 mortality in NHs with the average size of NHs and with the COVID-19 deaths at a population level.
Methods
The total number of COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related deaths in all NHs as well as the total number of NHs and NH beds were provided by representatives of 14 countries. The population level respective figures in each country were provided up to October 2021.
Results
There was a wide variation in prevalence of COVID-19 cases and deaths between countries. We observed a significant correlation between COVID-19 deaths in NHs and that of the total population and between the mean size of NHs and COVID-19 deaths.
Conclusion
Side-by-side comparisons between countries allow international sharing of good practice to better enable future pandemic preparedness.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Nursing homes (NHs) worldwide have extensively suffered from the COVID-19 pandemic. The first wave during spring 2020 hit NHs especially hard since 26–80% of all worldwide COVID-19 deaths occurred in NHs [1, 2]. This was due to several reasons, such as insufficient knowledge of the disease, lack of personal protective equipment, and shortage of diagnostic capacity. Most NH residents suffer from multimorbidities and considerable handicaps, and therefore, often show impaired immunity and malnutrition. Thus, NH residents living with frailty and disability have been extremely vulnerable to the virus. Furthermore, NHs provide “high-touch care”. This indicates that most NH residents need professionals’ assistance in dressing, bathing, toileting and/or in mobility. They share bathrooms, dining rooms and group activities. In addition, prevalent cognitive impairment means residents are less able to comply with quarantine rules and may walk around NHs, including into other residents’ rooms.
Until February 2021, a mean 41% of all worldwide COVID-19 deaths took place in long-term care [3, 4]. However, there are marked differences in the spread and mortality figures between countries. The factors behind the variations between NHs include resident-related factors, facility and staffing characteristics [3, 5, 6]. It has been suggested that high-quality NHs have lower prevalence of COVID-19 cases than those with lower quality although confounding factors may underlie this [7]. However, the full range of factors behind the wide variations between countries remains unclear. Most studies published so far report only the mortality rates during the first wave of COVID-19 (March to May 2020). To our knowledge, the latest figures reported are from February 2021 [3, 4].
The aim of this study was to compare prevalence of COVID-19 cases and related mortality in NHs in 14 countries up to October 2021. We explored the relationship between COVID-19 mortality in NHs with the average size of NHs in each country and with the COVID-19 deaths at a whole population level.
Methods
The figures were provided by representatives of the US and 13 European countries and include total COVID-19 cases and COVID-19-related deaths in all NHs as well as respective figures at the whole population level in each country from the beginning of the pandemic up to October 2021. Contributors from each country also provided the total number of NHs and NH beds in their country. The population data and figures for the total number of cases and deaths in each country were verified from www.worldometers.info [8]. We also checked that our data were in line with that in the OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) report [3]. The data are presented as numbers and percentages. The relationship between NH deaths and population level deaths or average NH size is illustrated with figures and Pearson correlation coefficients.
Results
The number of COVID-19 NH deaths per total population COVID-19 deaths ranged from 11% (Czech Republic) to 50% (Belgium). The proportion of COVID-19 cases per occupied NH bed ranged from 2.2% (Finland) up to 50% (USA). Some countries were unable to present these data due to lack of accurate diagnostic data especially during the first wave. The proportion of NH residents deceased due to COVID-19 per occupied NH beds ranged from 0.7% (Finland and Norway) to 9.8% (USA) (Table 1). A correlation was observed between COVID-19 deaths in NHs and deaths in the total population (r = 0.73). In addition, the mean size of NHs in each country and COVID-19 deaths correlated with each other (r = 0.56) (Fig. 1).
Discussion
The COVID-19 mortality rate in NHs was related with COVID-19 mortality in the total population. This indicates that the spread of virus to NHs derives from the total burden of COVID-19 in the surrounding society. Second, larger average size of NHs was associated with increased mortality.
Our study findings are in line with previous data suggesting that the prevalence of COVID-19 in the community is a strong predictor of COVID-19 spread in NHs [3, 4, 9]. In addition, larger NH facilities have been associated with a greater likelihood of COVID-19 outbreaks than smaller units [5, 9]. It has become evident that the structure in many NHs is suboptimal, as several residents often share a room facilitating the spread of health care-associated infections and hampering the isolation and quarantine measures [10]. Higher occupancy rates have been shown to be associated with increased risk of COVID-19 infection [6].
As a strength, our figures cover the situation in 14 countries until October 2021, and as far as we know, there is no such coverage published earlier. Our data provide figures at each country and population level. As limitations, we do not have data on facility level resident characteristics, staffing resources or qualifications, vaccinations, resident density, or their transit to/from hospitals. These have been associated with COVID-19 infection rate and mortality [3, 5, 9, 11,12,13]. It is well known that the education and qualification of staffing varies greatly between the countries. The deputies working in multiple wards or facilities easily transfer virus from one NH to another [5]. Countries also vary in applying safety measures and how they allow visitors [3, 5]. Resident admissions to hospital and back have a potential for transmitting the virus.
Our findings should be interpreted with caution. There are challenges in our international comparison due to low testing capacity during the first wave and routine testing being uncommon in many countries [3]. Some countries report deaths of NH residents irrespective of their site of death, whereas others report only deaths in NHs (e.g., Finland). Some countries report only those tested positive, whereas some report also suspected cases [3]. Moreover, NHs have varying definitions depending on country [15]. In some countries such as the USA and the Netherlands, NHs provide also subacute care and rehabilitation for short-term patients which may expose residents to infections. A previous OECD report differed from our analysis by including home care clients as long-term care residents [3]. Thus, there are great challenges in exploring the reasons behind the differences in prevalence and deaths of COVID-19 among NH residents between countries. However, our study suggests that the size of NH and the burden of virus in the surrounding population had a significant role in the number of COVID-19 cases and deaths in NHs.
Nevertheless, according to previous research and our current study, some factors behind the results could be identified and, furthermore, considered in aiming at minimizing the impact of future outbreaks in NHs. Previous studies suggest that the quality of NHs defined by the staffing ratio is of great importance as regards the pandemic, since lower staffing ratio has been associated with higher COVID-19 infection rates [7, 11]. Thus, smaller NH units combined with higher staffing ratio could be a solution to prevent contagious infections. High surrounding incidence of COVID-19 should be recognized as a red flag in itself, leading to certain protective measures in NHs, such as intensified infection control.
Finally, prevalence figures change quickly and this report reflects the situation in October 2021. Today, the figures have already changed as we are faced with the Omicron wave. However, we need to illustrate how COVID-19 has affected NHs during the course of the whole pandemic since NH residents form an especially vulnerable population. The NH outbreaks highlight the need for careful review of how we provide care and pandemic resilience in NHs. These side-by-side comparisons between countries could enable international sharing of good practice to better enable future pandemic preparedness [14].
References
Miralles O, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Marco E et al (2021) Unmet needs, health policies, and actions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a report from six European countries. Eur Geriatr Med 12:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00415-x
Pitkälä KH (2020) COVID-19 has hit nursing homes hard. Eur Geriatr Med 11:889–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00411-1
Rocard E, Sillitti P, Llena-Nozal A (2021) COVID-19 in long-term care: Impact, policy responses and challenges. OECD Health Working Papers No. 131. https://doi.org/10.1787/b966f837-en
Comas-Herrera A, Zalakaín J, Lemmon E et al (2020) Mortality associated with COVID-19 in care homes: international evidence. Article in LTCcovid.org. International Long-Term Care Policy Network, CPEC-LSE, 1st February 2021
Giri S, Chenn LM, Romero-Ortuno R (2021) Nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of challenges and responses. Eur Geriatr Med 12:1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-021-00531-2
Dutey-Magni PF, Williams H, Jhass A et al (2021) COVID-19 infection and attributable mortality in UK care homes: cohort study using active surveillance and electronic records (March-June 2020). Age Ageing 50:1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab060
Williams CS, Zheng Q, White AJ et al (2021) The association of nursing home quality ratings and spread of COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc 69:2070–2078. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17309
Konetzka RT, White EM, Pralea A, Grabowski DC, Mor V (2021) A systematic review of long-term care facility characteristics associated with COVID-19 outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 69:2766–2777. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17434
Szczerbińska K (2020) Could we have done better with COVID-19 in nursing homes? Eur Geriatr Med 11(4):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00362-7
Mehta HB, Li S, Goodwin JS (2021) Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections, hospitalization, and mortality among US nursing home residents. JAMA Netw Open 4:e216315. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6315
Mor V, Gutman R, Yang X et al (2021) Short-term impact of nursing home SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations on new infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. J Am Geriatr Soc 69:2063–2069. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17176
McGarry BE, Barnett ML, Grabowski DC, Gandhi AD (2021) Nursing home staff vaccination and Covid-19 outcomes. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2115674
Blain H, Rolland Y, Schols JMGA et al (2020) August 2020 interim EuGMS guidance to prepare European long-term care facilities for COVID-19. Eur Geriatr Med 11:899–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00405-z
Sanford AM, Orrell M, Tolson D et al (2015) An international definition for “nursing home.” J Am Med Dir Assoc 16:181–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2014.12.013
Acknowledgements
This study was inspired by the session “Rethinking nursing homes after COVID-19” in EuGMS congress in Athens on 13th October, 2021.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital. This research did not receive any funding from agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study concept and design: JGO and KHP; acquisition of data: all the authors; analysis and interpretation of data: ULA, KHP, and HK; preparation of manuscript: ULA and KHP; comments and approval of manuscript: all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aalto, U.L., Pitkälä, K.H., Andersen-Ranberg, K. et al. COVID-19 pandemic and mortality in nursing homes across USA and Europe up to October 2021. Eur Geriatr Med 13, 705–709 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00637-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-022-00637-1