Background
Pembrolizumab blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby inducing an antitumor immune response. In a phase I study, pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity and acceptable safety in patients with ipilimumab-treated melanoma, leading to accelerated approval in the US.
Materials and methods
KEYNOTE-002 is a randomized phase 2 study in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (ie, confirmed PD in the 24 weeks following ≥2 ipilimumab doses) and, if BRAF mutant, previously treated with a BRAF inhibitor. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W or investigator-choice chemotherapy (carboplatin + paclitaxel, carboplatin, paclitaxel, dacarbazine, or temozolomide). Patients with PD confirmed by independent central review could cross over to pembrolizumab treatment after the first 3-month assessment. Primary objective of the interim analysis prespecified to occur after ≥ 270 PFS events (RECIST v1.1, independent central review) was to evaluate the superiority of either pembrolizumab dose over control for PFS at a 1-sided 0.25% significance level (estimated HR 0.66).
Results
From Nov 2012 to Nov 2013, 540 patients from 12 countries enrolled. Based on central review of a total of 410 PFS events, the HR was 0.57 and 0.50 for pembrolizumab 2 and 10 mg/kg Q3W, respectively, over control (P<0.00001 for both comparisons). The 6-month PFS rate was 34% (95% CI 27%-41%) and 38% (95% CI 31%-45%) for pembrolizumab 2 and 10 mg/kg, respectively, compared with 16% (95% CI 10%-22%) for the control arm. PFS by investigator assessment was similar to that of central review. The PFS effect was consistent in all subgroups. ORR was 21% at 2 mg/kg, 25% at 10 mg/kg, and 4% in the control arm (P<0.0001 for both comparisons). Median response duration was not reached in either pembrolizumab arm and was 37 weeks in the control arm. Forty-eight percent of patients in the control arm crossed over to pembrolizumab treatment. OS data are not mature (final OS analysis will be performed after 370 deaths have occurred). The safety profile was consistent with that previously observed for pembrolizumab. Despite a decreased therapy duration, rates of grade 3-5 drug-related AEs were numerically higher in the chemotherapy control arm (26%) than in the pembrolizumab 2-mg/kg (11%) and 10-mg/kg (14%) arms.
Conclusion
Both pembrolizumab doses met prespecified criteria for PFS superiority over the chemotherapy control arm. Pembrolizumab significantly prolongs PFS compared with chemotherapy, approximately doubling the 6-month rate in an ipilimumab-refractory population.
Clinical trial registration number
NCT01704287
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Dummer, R., Daud, A., Puzanov, I. et al. A randomized controlled comparison of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with ipilimumab-refractory melanoma. J Transl Med 13 (Suppl 1), O5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-13-S1-O5
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-13-S1-O5