Abstract
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is recognized as one of the premier methods for measuring pH with this environmental variable expected to be an excellent biomarker for kidney diseases. Here we describe step-by-step CEST MRI experimental protocols for producing pH and perfusion maps for monitoring kidney pH homeostasis in rodents after administering iopamidol as contrast agent. Several CEST techniques, acquisition protocols and ratiometric approaches are described. The impact of length of acquisition time on the quality of the maps is detailed. These methods may be useful for investigating progression in kidney disease in vivo for rodent models.
This chapter is based upon work from the COST Action PARENCHIMA, a community-driven network funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) program of the European Union, which aims to improve the reproducibility and standardization of renal MRI biomarkers. This experimental protocol is complemented by two separate chapters describing the basic concepts and data analysis.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download protocol PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Kidney
- Mice
- Rats
- Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST)
- pH imaging
- Iopamidol
- Contrast agent
- Responsive contrast agent
1 Introduction
The kidneys are responsible for filtration of plasma in order to remove waste and toxins and for maintaining the acid–base balance of the body through regulation of systemic HCO3− concentrations [1]. The kidneys can either reabsorb or generate new HCO3− through acid excretion. Renal control of pH could be impacted by a number of factors including whether or not there are abnormalities in perfusion, filtration, amino acid metabolism or if renal tissue edema or inflammation are present. Based on a number of studies relating changes in acid production, secretion or reduced NH4+ with pathological conditions [2,3,4,5,6,7,8], pH should be a good biomarker for assessing renal function. A number of methods are now established for determining local pH in vivo, including use of pH micro electrodes [9,10,11], fluorescence imaging [12, 13], 1H, 31P, 19F MRS [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21] hyperpolarized 13C MRS [22], pH-dependent MR relaxometry [23], and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI [24, 25]. CEST is a novel MRI contrast mechanism allowing detection of low concentrations of contrast agent through the application of saturation radiofrequency (RF) pulses on their labile protons to destroy their magnetization with the resulting signal loss transferred to water through chemical exchange which has now emerged as the premier MRI method for pH imaging [7, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Here we describe CEST MRI for monitoring of the local pH variation found in the kidney of rodents in a step-by-step experimental protocol. The rationale for the choosing acquisition parameters is given in generic terms, together with specific parameter examples.
Mapping of contrast agent renal perfusion is described as an optional component of the experiment. Contrast agent perfusion is a functional parameter that is also sensitive to kidney damage. Currently CT, SPECT and gadolinium based MR imaging are available for assessing renal perfusion in patients, each with its own limitations [33]. CEST MRI contrast enables production of high resolution images of perfusion without need of using ionizing radiation making mapping of perfusion a valuable complement to pH imaging [34].
The protocols contained in this chapter were tested on healthy control mice using Iopamidol as the contrast agent to standardize the pH mapping and tested for both an axial slice and a coronal slice for bench marking. These methods may be useful for investigating renal pH and perfusion variations found in vivo for various rodent models with acute kidney injuries or which progress to chronic kidney disease.
This experimental protocol chapter is complemented by two separate chapters describing the basic concepts and data analysis, which are part of this book.
This chapter is part of the book Pohlmann A, Niendorf T (eds) (2020) Preclinical MRI of the Kidney—Methods and Protocols. Springer, New York.
2 Materials
2.1 Animals
This experimental protocol is tailored for immunocompetent (typically C57BL/6 and Balb/C) or immunocompromised (nude, NOD-SCID) mice with a body mass of 15–35 g. Advice for adaptation to rats is given as Notes where necessary. All animal studies have to be carried out in compliance with specific legislation covering the use of animals for scientific purposes. Therefore, all experiments must be authorized under national regulations.
2.2 Lab Equipment and Chemicals
-
1.
Mouse tail illuminator/restrainer for catheterizing the tail vein.
-
2.
Saline solution or heparin solution, 1-ml syringe, catheter (e.g., PE 20 polyethylene tubing) of known inner diameter to hold the saline flush and for contrast agent bolus is required.
-
3.
Anesthesia: please refer to the chapter by Kaucsar T et al. “Preparation and Monitoring of Small Animals in Renal MRI” for an in-depth description and discussion of the anesthesia. Typically, 0.5–1.5% isoflurane is used for anesthesia administered to the mice using an anesthetic gas vaporizer (Leica Biosystems, Maryland, USA). For nonrecovery experiments, urethane solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany; 20% in distilled water) can provide anesthesia for several hours with comparatively few side effects on renal physiology, which is an important issue. For intramuscular anesthesia, please refer to Note 1.
-
4.
Gases: O2, N2, and compressed air, as well as a gas-mixing system or general inhalation anesthesia equipment, including an anesthetic vaporizer, a flow meter and an induction chamber.
-
5.
Mouse cradle.
-
6.
pH imaging contrast agent: typically iodinated-based contrast media are employed, as Iopamidol (Isovue® 370, Bracco Imaging SpA, Milano, Italy), Iopromide (300 mg iodine/ml Ultravist®, Bayer Healthcare, Germany) or Iobitridol (Omnipaque®, GE Healthcare, USA). Such clinically available contrast agents have stock concentrations of 0.9–1 M that can be directly used (see Note 2).
-
7.
Small Animal Ventilator: animals (rats) needs to be ventilated so the CEST MRI acquisition can be gated to minimize the respiratory motion artifacts. We used a TOPO Dual Mode Rodent/Small Animal Ventilator (Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT).
-
8.
Syringe Infusion Pump: an MR-compatible single syringe pump (Harvard Bioscience, Holliston, MA) for contrast agent administration.
2.3 MRI Hardware
The general hardware requirements for renal 1H MRI on mice and rats are described in the chapter by Ramos Delgado P et al. “Hardware Considerations for Preclinical Magnetic Resonance of the Kidney.” The technique described in this chapter has been tailored for MR preclinical systems at magnetic fields higher than 3 T but advice for adaptation to other field strengths is given where necessary (see Note 3). No special or additional hardware is required, except for the following:
-
1.
A physiological monitoring system that can track the respiration and which is connected to the MR system such that it can be used to synchronize CEST MRI with respiration. Typically, we use the MR-compatible rodent monitoring and gating system (Small Animal Instruments, New York, USA) equipped with an air-pillow to monitor breath rate.
2.4 MRI Sequences
The CEST MRI sequence includes continuous wave (CW) RF saturation followed by fast image readout such as echo planar imaging (EPI), Rapid Imaging with Refocused Echoes (RARE) and/or fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) [6, 35,36,37]. Herein we describe those based on fast refocused multiecho sequences since they provide the higher SNR in acceptable acquisition times and are without geometrical distortions. The same sequence readout is described for B0 mapping, for full Z-spectrum acquisition and for dynamic acquisition applications.
3 Methods
3.1 MR Protocol Setup
3.1.1 Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes Sequence for External B0 Mapping Using WASSR
-
1.
Select a 2D Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes sequence in conjunction with a magnetization transfer preparation module that has a frequency offset which can be incremented within a single scan. This is a standard sequence on Bruker MRI systems, called “RARE.”
-
2.
Switch on the magnetization transfer module. The magnetization transfer pulse parameters are then adjusted to allow detection of direct water saturation vs. excitation frequency and also the signal-to-noise >50:1 when the saturation pulse is 500 Hz or more away from water. Typically, we employ N = 11,000 ms rectangular shaped pulse with saturation power (amplitude) of 1–1.5 μT, similar to what was previously described for the WASSR Scheme [38].
-
3.
Sample several frequency offsets around the frequency of bulk water signal (commonly set at 0 ppm, in contrast to the 4.8 ppm as in conventional NMR experiments). Usually the sampled range is between −3 and +3 ppm with different step size, according to the available acquisition time and expected B0 inhomogeneity. Please see Note 4 for an example of the frequency list used in B0 mapping.
-
4.
Choose a repetition time (TR) of ~5–6 s for good signal stability and signal-to-noise per time (SNR/t) efficiency. TR will be limited by the length of the saturation pulse, length of echo train and the number of slices to be acquired, and saturation pulse(s)’s field strength.
-
5.
Use the shortest echo time (TE) and echo spacing (ΔTE) possible. One wants to acquire as many lines of k space as possible to minimize motion distortions of the images. For that reason, it is advantageous to have ΔTE well below 10 ms. Larger ΔTE are not advisable because the SNR in the kidney will be so low that these images must be excluded. Acquisition bandwidth should be considered to shorten the ΔTE.
-
6.
Set the rare factor as high as possible to reduce scan time. Same as the CEST acquisition scan (Subheading 3.1.2).
-
7.
Set the acquisition bandwidth (BW) as for the CEST contrast scan (Subheading 3.1.2).
-
8.
Switch on the fat saturation module.
-
9.
Do not use the respiration trigger since this will increase the overall acquisition time.
-
10.
Set the same geometry as for the CEST contrast scan (Subheading 3.1.2).
-
11.
Set the matrix size/acceleration the same as for the CEST contrast scan (Subheading 3.1.2).
-
12.
For an example of a specific parameter set please see Note 5.
3.1.2 Full Z-Spectrum Acquisition for CEST-pH Mapping
-
1.
Select a 2D Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes sequence with magnetization transfer preparation module. This is a standard sequence on Bruker MRI systems, called “RARE.” RARE sequence with centric encoding is used. More details on CEST sequences for Bruker scanners are provided in Note 6.
-
2.
Switch on the Magnetization transfer module. The magnetization transfer pulse parameters are then adjusted to allow detection of CEST contrast while keeping the current within limits given by the RF transmit coil and the 1H RF power amplifier. For CEST pH mapping, Z-spectra are acquired by applying a 1.5–6 μT continuous wave (CW) block shaped (bp) presaturation pulse for 2–5 seconds or by applying a pulsed saturation scheme (see Subheading 2.4.3.35).
-
3.
Acquire a series of 30–50 frequencies in the range of ±10 ppm for the whole CEST Z-spectrum acquisition. A macro file containing the MR frequencies is manually implemented by the operator in Bruker systems, by creating a list of frequencies covering the positive and negative side of CEST spectra. At the resonating frequencies of mobile protons (4.2/4.3 ppm and 5.5 ppm for Iopamidol and Iopromide, 5.6 ppm for Iobitridol) a denser sampling is usually applied (frequency resolution of 0.1 ppm). Please see Note 7 for an example of the frequency list.
-
4.
Choose the Repetition Time (TR) in the range 4–6 s for good signal stability and signal-to-noise per time (SNR/t) efficiency, also according to the duration of the saturation pulse.
-
5.
Use the shortest TE and echo spacing (ΔTE) possible.
-
6.
Set the Rare factor to 64–96. Typically, a single shot acquisition (Rare Factor equal to Matrix Size) to reduce the acquisition time for each frequency. Partial Fourier acceleration should be considered to reduce the size of the matrix and improve the time efficiency of data acquisition and centric encoding to maximize SNR. Reconstruction to higher matrix size may be also considered to improve spatial resolution.
-
7.
Use a high acquisition bandwidth (BW) to shorten ΔTE, while keeping an eye on the SNR, which decreases with increasing BW.
-
8.
Switch on the fat saturation module. Important to avoid fat signal overlaying with the kidney due to chemical shift.
-
9.
Set off the respiration trigger.
-
10.
Adapt the geometry of the slice(s) so that animal fits into FOV in L-R direction (approx. 30–40 mm, according to the coil inner diameter) and use frequency encoding in H-F direction. Use a slice with the lowest thickness the SNR allows, typically around 1.5–2.0 mm. The thinner the slices the better, as this improves the resolution—which can be readily seen on the raw images.
-
11.
Use the highest in-plane resolution that the SNR allows. A typical matrix size of 64 × 64, 96 × 96, or 128 × 128 is used for CEST images, with in-plane spatial resolution of 468, 312, or 234 μm (for an FOV of 30 mm). This has to be balanced by the need for sufficient SNR in the images. Zero-filling or use of partial Fourier techniques in the phase encoding direction can be helpful to speed up acquisition to minimize motion artifacts and contrast agent concentration changes during the acquisition.
-
12.
For an example of a specific parameter set for mice please see Note 8 or for rats please see Note 9.
3.1.3 Rapid Acquisition with Refocused Echoes Sequence for CEST pH and Perfusion Measurements
-
1.
Select a 2D rapid acquisition with refocused echoes sequence (RARE) with magnetization transfer preparation module.
-
2.
Switch on the magnetization transfer module. The magnetization transfer pulse parameters are then adjusted to allow detection of CEST contrast while keeping the current within the limits given by the RF transmit coil, the 1H RF power amplifier and the signal-to-noise >50:1 at the frequency of the labile protons of interest on the CEST agent. Typically, we employ signal averaging with N = 10, 300 ms rectangular shaped RF pulses with an amplitude between 3 and 4 μT. The saturation frequency is alternated between 4.2 ppm, 5.5 ppm for collection of signal with saturation on resonance with the two labile protons in iopamidol and for the last ten images −100 ppm for collection of S0 (signal with no saturation).
-
3.
Choose a repetition time (TR) between 7 and 12 s for good signal stability and signal-to-noise per time (SNR/t) efficiency.
-
4.
Use the shortest TE and echo spacing (ΔTE) possible (see Subheading 3.1.2).
-
5.
Use a rare factor of 20–32. Typically, 20–32 TEs are sensible and allow acquiring a 32 × 32 matrix slice or 48 × 48 with partial Fourier acceleration in a single shot. Partial Fourier acceleration should be considered to reduce the size of the matrix and improve the time efficiency of data acquisition.
-
6.
Use a high acquisition bandwidth (BW) to shorten ΔTE, while keeping an eye on the SNR, which decreases with increasing BW. For the image with the shortest TE an SNR of at least 60 is recommended.
-
7.
Switch on the fat saturation module. Important to avoid fat signal overlaying with the kidney due to chemical shift.
-
8.
Use an FOV saturation of 4 mm thickness above 9–13 mm from the kidneys for coronal slices. This is not required for axial slices.
-
9.
Set off the respiration trigger.
-
10.
Adapt the geometry of the acquisition slices so that the animal fits into FOV in L-R direction (approx. 30–40 mm according to the coil inner diameter) and use frequency encoding in H-F direction. Use a slice with the lowest thickness the SNR allows, typically around 1.5 mm. The thinner the slices the better, as this improves the resolution—which can be readily seen on the raw images. For adaptation to rats see Note 10.
-
11.
Use highest in-plane resolution that the SNR allows, typically around 600 × 400 um2 for axial slices or 200 × 500 μm2 for coronal slices. This has to be balanced by the need for sufficient SNR in the images. Use zero-filling or partial Fourier techniques in the phase encoding direction to speed up acquisition and to minimize motion artifacts and contrast agent concentration changes during the acquisition. One may use half Fourier in read direction (asymmetric echo) to further shorten the first TE. Reducing the excitation and refocusing pulse lengths to below 1.5 ms can then also help to shorten TE.
-
12.
For an example of a specific parameter set please see Note 11.
3.2 Setting of the pH Calibration Curve
Prepare multiple vials of Iopamidol phosphate-buffered solution (PBS 1×, 10 mM of inorganic phosphates) or human blood serum solutions, with pH titrated to physiological relevant renal pH values: 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0 and place them in a plastic container (e.g., 30–50 ml falcon tube) filled with water. Such a phantom calibration experiment is crucial for in vivo pH quantification at different experimental conditions such as magnetic field strength and CEST irradiation Schemes [39]. A more detailed description for pH calibration curve can be found in the chapter by Kim H et al. “Analysis Protocol for the Quantification of Renal pH Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI.”
-
1.
Acquire the CEST Z-spectrum by sweeping RF saturation to a series of frequency offsets around the bulk water resonance. Note that the magnitude of the saturation field (B1) and duration can be adjusted serially to facilitate Z-spectral acquisition. For an example of specific parameters at 7 T please see Note 12, whereas for an example of specific parameters at 4.7 T please see Note 13 and for the same at 11.7 T please see Note 14.
3.3 Preparations of the Contrast Agent Injection and of the Catheter
-
1.
Fill the 1-ml syringe with the contrast agent stock solution.
-
2.
Prepare the catheter by filling the PE20 tubing with the contrast agent solution, and with 20–60 μl of a heparin solution (or a saline solution), between the needle (the animal) and the contrast agent solution to prevent clotting before the contrast agent will be injected.
-
3.
According to the length of the catheter (usually 60–100 cm to exit from the magnet bore) the contrast agent solution can be injected directly from the syringe containing the contrast agent or by changing the syringe with one filled with a (heparin-free) saline solution for the postinjection flush.
3.4 Preparation of the Mouse
-
1.
Place the mouse on a mouse tail illuminator restrainer for catheterizing the tail vein. Catheterize the tail vein by placing a 27/29-G needle in the animal.
-
2.
Induce anesthesia via isoflurane in an induction box. Transfer the animal to the scanner (Note 15).
-
3.
Set up the temperature monitoring (rectal probe) and respiratory monitoring (balloon on chest) unit. Keep the animal’s respiration rate during imaging at 35–80 breaths per min by adjusting the dose of anesthesia (approximately 1–1.5% isoflurane with air and oxygen mixed at a 3:1 ratio administered through a nose cone attached to the animal bed and ophthalmic ointment will be applied to the eyes) (see Note 16).
-
4.
Perform anatomical imaging as described in the chapter by Pohlmann A et al. “Essential Practical Steps for MRI of the Kidney in Experimental Research.”
-
5.
Perform localized shimming on the kidney imaging as described in the chapter by Pohlmann A et al. “Essential Practical Steps for MRI of the Kidney in Experimental Research” (see Note 17).
3.5 B0 Mapping
3.5.1 External B0 Mapping
-
1.
Load the B0 mapping sequence and adapt the slice orientation to provide a coronal or axial view of the two kidneys based on the tripilot/scout and anatomical images collected.
-
2.
Run the B0 mapping scan using 42 offsets from −1.5 to +1.5 ppm and B1 = 1.5 μT. Example images are shown in Fig. 1.
3.5.2 Internal B0 Mapping
-
1.
Acquire a full Z-spectrum with some frequency offsets sampled around 0 ppm to exploit the Z-spectrum for internal measurement of B0 shifts as described in the chapter by Kim H et al. “Analysis Protocol for the Quantification of Renal pH Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI.”
3.6 CEST Acquisition for pH Mapping
-
1.
Perform the CEST experiment by acquiring CEST images before, (during) and after injection of the contrast agent. Choose among the different pH mapping procedures by conventional ratiometric approach (Subheading 3.5.1), pH mapping with power ratiometric method (Subheading 3.5.2) or dynamic CEST perfusion and pH mapping (Subheading 3.5.3).
3.6.1 pH Mapping with Conventional Ratiometric Method (Full Z-Spectrum)
-
1.
Load the pH mapping sequence , using the same geometry as used for anatomical and B0 mapping. Switch off the magnetization module and use this sequence to set the receiver gain.
-
2.
Load the pH mapping sequence , using the same geometry as used for anatomical and B0 mapping. Set the receiver gain as calculated by the magnetization off sequence (see Subheading 3.5.1.15). Load the macro file containing the offset frequencies to be saturated and run the sequence for CEST preinjection scanning.
-
3.
Clone the pH mapping scans, at least one time for acquiring one CEST postinjection scan.
-
4.
After the acquisition of the CEST prescan, perform a bolus injection of iodine contrast agent through the tail vein catheter at a dose of 1.0–1.5 iodine/kg b.w. (see Note 18).
-
5.
Run the postinjection scans.
-
6.
A demonstration of the acquired images at different offsets and of CEST contrast that can be expected for the pH mapping scans are given in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, respectively.
3.6.2 pH Mapping with Power Ratiometric Method (Full Z-Spectrum)
-
1.
Load the pH mapping sequence , using the same geometry as used for anatomical and B0 mapping. Switch off the magnetization module and use this sequence to set the receiver gain.
-
2.
Load the pH mapping sequence , using the same geometry as used for anatomical and B0 mapping. Set the receiver gain as calculated by the magnetization off sequence (see Subheading 3.6.1.15). Load the macro file containing the offset frequencies to saturate at a first selected power pulse (1.5 μT) and run the sequence for CEST preinjection scanning.
-
3.
Clone the scan and set the second selected saturation power pulse (6 μT). Run the sequence for CEST preinjection scanning.
-
4.
Clone two times the scans with 1.5 and 6 μT saturation power pulse for acquiring the postinjection scans.
-
5.
Perform a bolus injection of iodine contrast agent with single amide exchanging pool (e.g., iobitridol) through the tail vein catheter at a dose of 1.0–1.5 iodine/kg b.w. (see Note 18).
-
6.
Run the postinjection scans.
3.6.3 pH and Perfusion Mapping with Two Offset Sampling
-
1.
Load the pH mapping sequence , using the same geometry as used for B0 mapping and setting up a collection to run for 1 h, 5 min alternating the saturation frequency between 4.2 ppm (labile proton #1 for iopamidol), 5.5 ppm (labile proton #2 for iopamidol), and for the final ten images at −100 ppm (S0 image) (see Note 19).
-
2.
Initiate the pH mapping scans.
-
3.
Exactly 5 min after starting the pH mapping scans, perform a bolus injection of contrast agent: inject iopamidol through the tail vein at a dose of 1.0 g iodine/kg using ~100–150 μl.
-
4.
Approximately 1 h after injection, end the pH mapping scan collection.
-
5.
A demonstration of the contrast changes that can be expected for the pH mapping scans are given in Fig. 4.
4 Notes
-
1.
Intramuscular anesthesia can be administered as a mixture of xylazine 5 mg/kg (Rompun, Bayer, Milan, Italy) and tiletamine/zolepan 20 mg/kg (Zoletil 100, Virbac, Milano, Italy).
-
2.
To reduce the viscosity of these solutions, hence the pressure needed to infuse these solutions, syringes can be warmed at 37 °C before the injection. Please avoid the inclusion of air bubbles in the catheter filled with the saline solution or with the contrast agent solution that will be injected into the animals.
-
3.
CEST pH measurements are basically performed on Bruker MR systems as Biospec 117/20 (11.7 T), Avance 300 (7 T), Pharmascan 70/16 (7 T), or Biospec (3 T) (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). Standard 1H transmit/receive coils (birdcage, quadrature) or phased-array coils (4- or 8-channel mouse body phase array receive coil) to improve SNR can be used.
-
4.
WASSR B0 mapping frequency list (in ppm): −1.5, −1.4, −1.3, −1.2, −1.1, −1.0, −0.9, −0.8, −0.7, −0.6, −0.5, −0.4, −0.3, −0.2, −0.1, 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5.
-
5.
Scan acquisition parameters for B0 mapping: TR = 5000 ms; magnetization transfer power = 1.5 μΤ; magnetization transfer module time = 3 s; MT offset mode = Sequential_Offset; effective TE = 3.49 ms; RARE Factor = 32; averages = 1; centric encoding; slice thickness = 1.5 mm; slice orientation = axial; frequency encoding = head-feet; FOV = 28 × 19 mm; matrix size = 48 × 48 reconstructed to 128 × 128; fat suppression = on.
-
6.
Standard Bruker sequences for the software versions PV5 and PV6 include only a Magnetization Transfer module that allows the saturation of a single frequency offset. As a consequence, full Z-spectrum acquisition can only be acquired by cloning the same scan and modifying for each scan the irradiated frequency offset. Therefore, for in vivo experiments this may lead to acquisition times that are not feasible in reasonable time. Bruker sequences for PV5 and PV6 that have been modified to accept a frequency list for acquiring the full Z-spectrum in a single scan are available upon request to the authors (dario.longo@unito.it; mtmcmaho@gmail.com; pzhesun@emory.edu). Starting from PV360 a new CEST module has been implemented with different readout sequences (RARE, EPI, Spiral) that allows to fix this issue. MR Solutions vendor has already a CEST module that can be applied with an EPI-based readout scheme.
-
7.
Frequency list (in ppm) for a full Z-spectrum acquisition (43 offsets): 0, 0.5, −0.5, 1.0, −1.0, 1.5, −1.5, 2.0, −2.0, 3.0, −3.0, 3.9, −3.9, 4.0, −4.0, 4.1, −4.1, 4.2, −4.2, 4.3, −4.3, 4.4, −4.4, 4.5, −4.5, 5.2, −5.2, 5.3, −5.3, 5.4, −5.4, 5.5, −5.5, 5.6, −5.6, 5.7, −5.7, 5.8, −5.8, 7.5, −7.5, 10.0, and −10.0.
-
8.
Example for a 30 g mouse at 7 T: TR = 6000 ms; magnetization transfer power = 3 μΤ; magnetization transfer module time = 5 s; MT offset mode = from file; effective TE = 4.14 ms; RARE Factor = 96; averages = 1; centric encoding; slice thickness = 1.5 mm; slice orientation = axial; frequency encoding = head-feet; FOV = 30 mm; matrix size = 96 × 96 reconstructed to 128 × 128; fat suppression = on.
-
9.
Example for a 150 g rat at 4.7 T: Z-spectra are collected with moderate saturation RF power (B1) levels of 1.0 and 2.0 μT. The in vivo CEST MRI parameters were as the following: RF saturation offsets from −7.0 to 7.0 ppm with intervals of 0.125 ppm, and TR, TS and TE were 6 s, 3 s, and 18 ms, respectively, for an image matrix of 48 × 48.
-
10.
For rats increase the FOV to the body width and keep the matrix size the same or similar. The relative resolution is then identical and the SNR should also be similar, because the larger rat RF coil provides worse SNR (e.g., eight-channel rat body phase array receive coil vs eight-channel mouse body phase array receive coil).
-
11.
Example for a 30 g mouse at 11.7 T: TR = 9000 ms; magnetization transfer power = 4 μΤ; magnetization transfer pulse number = 10; magnetization transfer inter pulse delay = 10 μs; magnetization transfer pulse length = 300 ms; magnetization transfer module time = 3 s; MT offset mode = from file; effective TE = 3.49 ms; RARE Factor = 32; averages = 1; centric encoding; slice thickness = 1.5 mm; slice orientation = axial; frequency encoding = head-feet; FOV = 28 × 19 mm2; matrix size = 48 × 48 using partial Fourier of 1.5; fat suppression = on.
-
12.
Phantom CEST acquisition parameters at 7 T: RF saturation offsets from −10.0 to 10.0 ppm with intervals of 0.1–0.2 ppm. TR = 10s, TE = 4.8 ms, saturation = 3 μT × 5 s, matrix size = 64 × 64, FOV = 30 × 30 mm2 with centric encoding.
-
13.
Phantom CEST acquisition parameters at 4.7 T: RF saturation offsets from −7 to 7 ppm with intervals of 0.25 ppm. TR = 12 s, TE = 39.5 ms, saturation: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 μT × 5 s, matrix size = 64 × 64, FOV =48 × 48 mm with centric encoding.
-
14.
Phantom CEST acquisition parameters at 11.7 T:: 25 mm transmit/receive volume coil; TR = 5000 ms; magnetization transfer power = six different saturation power (B1) from 1 to 6 μΤ; magnetization transfer module time = 3 s; MT offset mode = Sequential_Offset; 71 CEST offsets between ±7 ppm plus one at +40 ppm for M0; effective TE = 3.39 ms; RARE Factor = 16; averages = 1; centric encoding; slice thickness = 1.0 mm; slice orientation = axial; frequency encoding = head-feet; FOV = 28 × 19 mm2; matrix size = 64 × 48.
-
15.
Mice can be alternatively anesthetized with intramuscular anesthesia, tail veins heated with hot water/heater equipment at 37 °C and catheter placed in the animal.
-
16.
You must monitor the respiration continuously throughout the entire experiment.
-
17.
B0 Shimming is particularly important, since macroscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities affect the exact resonance frequency of the labile protons in a voxel, and can impact the pH and perfusion measurements and hinder quantitative intra- and inter-subject comparisons. Shimming should be performed on a voxel enclosing both kidneys using either the default iterative shimming method or the Mapshim technique (recommended).
-
18.
Injections can be manually or automatically performed. For manual injection, keep injection constant within 20–30 s. Automatic injection can be performed with dedicated injection pumps, by setting injection speed of contrast agent at 400 μl/min. For instance, a 25 g mouse would receive ca 70 μl to achieve a dose of 1 g iodine/kg b.w. with a stock solution of 370 mg iodine/ml.
-
19.
The exact list of frequencies used here can be adjusted based on the B0 shimming conditions of the kidneys and the saturation power applied. For example, if the B0 varies by more than say 0.1 ppm, additional frequencies around each labile proton should be added to allow B0 correction at the expense of SNR due to the reduced redundancy of the data collected.
References
Hamm LL, Nakhoul N, Hering-Smith KS (2015) Acid-base homeostasis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10(12):2232–2242
Soleimani M, Rastegar A (2016) Pathophysiology of renal tubular acidosis: core curriculum 2016. Am J Kidney Dis 68(3):488–498. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.422
Gil-Peña H, Mejía N, Santos F (2014) Renal tubular acidosis. J Pediatr 164(4):691–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.10.085
Gillies RJ, Raghunand N, Garcia-Martin ML, Gatenby RA (2004) pH imaging. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 23(5):57–64
Raghunand N, Howison C, Sherry AD, Zhang S, Gillies RJ (2003) Renal and systemic pH imaging by contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 49(2):249–257
Longo DL, Busato A, Lanzardo S, Antico F, Aime S (2013) Imaging the pH evolution of an acute kidney injury model by means of iopamidol, a MRI-CEST pH-responsive contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 70(3):859–864
Longo DL, Cutrin JC, Michelotti F, Irrera P, Aime S (2017) Noninvasive evaluation of renal pH homeostasis after ischemia reperfusion injury by CEST-MRI. NMR Biomed 30(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.372
Hashim AI, Zhang XM, Wojtkowiak JW, Martinez GV, Gillies RJ (2011) Imaging pH and metastasis. NMR Biomed 24(6):582–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1644
Ashby BS (1966) pH studies in human malignant tumours. Lancet 288(7458):312–315
Prescott DM, Charles HC, Poulson JM, Page RL, Thrall DE, Vujaskovic Z, Dewhirst MW (2000) The relationship between intracellular and extracellular pH in spontaneous canine tumors. Clin Cancer Res 6(6):2501–2505
Wike-Hooley JL, van den Berg AP, van der Zee J, Reinhold HS (1985) Human tumour pH and its variation. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21(7):785789–787791
Li C, Xia J, Wei X, Yan H, Si Z, Ju S (2010) pH-activated near-infrared fluorescence nanoprobe imaging tumors by sensing the acidic microenvironment. Adv Funct Mater 20(14):2222–2230
Hassan M, Riley J, Chernomordik V, Smith P, Pursley R, Lee SB, Capala J, Amir HG (2007) Fluorescence lifetime imaging system for in vivo studies. Mol Imaging 6(4):7290.2007.00019
García-Martín M-L, Hérigault G, Rémy C, Farion R, Ballesteros P, Coles JA, Cerdán S, Ziegler A (2001) Mapping extracellular pH in rat brain gliomas in vivo by H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: comparison with maps of metabolites. Cancer Res 61(17):6524–6531
Gillies R, Liu Z, Bhujwalla Z (1994) 31P-MRS measurements of extracellular pH of tumors using 3-aminopropylphosphonate. Am J Phys Cell Phys 267(1):C195–C203
Gillies RJ, Morse DL (2005) In vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy in cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 7:287–326
Vermathen P, Capizzano AA, Maudsley AA (2000) Administration and 1H MRS detection of histidine in human brain: application to in vivo pH measurement. Magn Reson Med 43(5):665–675
Bhujwalla ZM, McCoy C, Glickson J, Gillies R, Stubbs M (1998) Estimations of intra-and extracellular volume and pH by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy: effect of therapy on RIF-1 tumours. Br J Cancer 78(5):606
Aoki Y, Akagi K, Tanaka Y, Kawai J, Takahashi M (1996) Measurement of intratumor pH by pH indicator used in 19F-magnetic resonance spectroscopy: measurement of extracellular pH decrease caused by hyperthermia combined with hydralazine. Investig Radiol 31(11):680–689
Zhou R, Bansal N, Leeper DB, Glickson JD (2000) Intracellular acidification of human melanoma xenografts by the respiratory inhibitor m-iodobenzylguanidine plus hyperglycemia: a 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Cancer Res 60(13):3532–3536
Ojugo AS, McSheehy PM, McIntyre DJ, McCoy C, Stubbs M, Leach MO, Judson IR, Griffiths JR (1999) Measurement of the extracellular pH of solid tumours in mice by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: a comparison of exogenous 19F and 31P probes. NMR Biomed 12(8):495–504
Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu D-E, Ardenkjær-Larsen JH, Jensen PR, Karlsson M, Golman K, Lerche MH, Brindle KM (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate. Nature 453(7197):940–943
Garcia-Martin ML, Martinez GV, Raghunand N, Sherry AD, Zhang S, Gillies RJ (2006) High resolution pHe imaging of rat glioma using pH-dependent relaxivity. Magn Reson Med 55(2):309–315
McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Bulte JWM, van Zijl PCM (2017) Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging: advances and applications, 1st edn. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore
Longo D, Aime S (2017) Iodinated contrast media as pH-responsive CEST agents. In: McMahon MT, Gilad AA, JBM B, PCM VZ (eds) Chemical exchange saturation transfer imaging. Vol. Advances and applications. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore, pp 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315364421-20
Pavuluri K, McMahon MT (2017) pH imaging using chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI. Isr J Chem 57(9):862–879. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijch.201700075
Longo DL, Dastrù W, Digilio G, Keupp J, Langereis S, Lanzardo S, Prestigio S, Steinbach O, Terreno E, Uggeri F (2011) Iopamidol as a responsive MRI-chemical exchange saturation transfer contrast agent for pH mapping of kidneys: In vivo studies in mice at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 65(1):202–211
Longo DL, Sun PZ, Consolino L, Michelotti FC, Uggeri F, Aime S (2014) A general MRI-CEST ratiometric approach for pH imaging: demonstration of in vivo pH mapping with iobitridol. J Am Chem Soc 136(41):14333–14336
Wu RH, Longo DL, Aime S, Sun PZ (2015) Quantitative description of radiofrequency (RF) power-based ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) pH imaging. NMR Biomed 28(5):555–565. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3284
Yang X, Song X, Ray Banerjee S, Li Y, Byun Y, Liu G, Bhujwalla ZM, Pomper MG, McMahon MT (2016) Developing imidazoles as CEST MRI pH sensors. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 11(4):304–312
McMahon MT, Gilad AA, Zhou J, Sun PZ, Bulte JW, van Zijl P (2006) Quantifying exchange rates in chemical exchange saturation transfer agents using the saturation time and saturation power dependencies of the magnetization transfer effect on the magnetic resonance imaging signal (QUEST and QUESP): pH calibration for poly-L-lysine and a starburst dendrimer. Magn Reson Med 55(4):836–847
Anemone A, Consolino L, Arena F, Capozza M, Longo DL (2019) Imaging tumor acidosis: a survey of the available techniques for mapping in vivo tumor pH. Cancer Metastasis Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-019-09782-9
Grenier N, Cornelis F, Le Bras Y, Rigou G, Boutault JR, Bouzgarrou M (2013) Perfusion imaging in renal diseases. Diagn Interv Imaging 94(12):1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2013.08.018
Anemone A, Consolino L, Longo DL (2017) MRI-CEST assessment of tumour perfusion using X-ray iodinated agents: comparison with a conventional Gd-based agent. Eur Radiol 27(5):2170–2179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4552-7
Sheth VR, Li Y, Chen LQ, Howison CM, Flask CA, Pagel MD (2012) Measuring in vivo tumor pHe with CEST-FISP MRI. Magn Reson Med 67(3):760–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23038
Sun PZ, Cheung JS, Wang E, Benner T, Sorensen AG (2011) Fast multislice pH-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI with unevenly segmented RF irradiation. Magn Reson Med 65(2):588–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22628
Pavuluri K, Manoli I, Pass A, Li Y, Vernon HJ, Venditti CP, McMahon MT (2019) Noninvasive monitoring of chronic kidney disease using pH and perfusion imaging. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaw8357
Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J, van Zijl PC (2009) Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments. Magn Reson Med 61(6):1441–1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21873
Sun PZ, Longo DL, Hu W, Xiao G, Wu R (2014) Quantification of iopamidol multi-site chemical exchange properties for ratiometric chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging of pH. Phys Med Biol 59(16):4493
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Maryland Stem Cell Research Foundation MSCRF#2829 and NIH P41EB024495. The Italian Ministry for Education and Research (MIUR) is gratefully acknowledged for yearly FOE funding to the Euro-BioImaging Multi-Modal Molecular Imaging Italian Node (MMMI).
This chapter is based upon work from COST Action PARENCHIMA, supported by European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST). COST (www.cost.eu) is a funding agency for research and innovation networks. COST Actions help connect research initiatives across Europe and enable scientists to enrich their ideas by sharing them with their peers. This boosts their research, career, and innovation.
PARENCHIMA (renalmri.org) is a community-driven Action in the COST program of the European Union, which unites more than 200 experts in renal MRI from 30 countries with the aim to improve the reproducibility and standardization of renal MRI biomarkers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Pavuluri, K.D., Consolino, L., Longo, D.L., Irrera, P., Sun, P.Z., McMahon, M.T. (2021). Renal pH Mapping Using Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI: Experimental Protocol. In: Pohlmann, A., Niendorf, T. (eds) Preclinical MRI of the Kidney. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2216. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0978-1_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-0977-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-0978-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols