Abstract
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are well-established as inhibitors of factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin in the treatment and prevention of thrombosis. However, there is growing evidence that beneficial outcomes might be based on additional pleiotropic effects beyond anticoagulation. FXa and thrombin are also known to activate protease-activated receptors (PARs), which can mediate pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects. Since PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 play an important role in the development of atherosclerosis, the inhibition of this pathway represents an interesting potential target for preventing the progression of atherosclerosis and fibrosis. This review focuses on potential pleiotropic effects of FXa inhibition with edoxaban seen in a variety of studies in different in vitro and in vivo test systems. As common findings from these experiments, edoxaban was able to attenuate FXa- and thrombin-induced pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokine expression. In some, but not all experiments edoxaban was also shown to decrease the levels of PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 expression. Further studies are required to clarify the clinical implications of the pleiotropic effects mediated by NOACs.
Zusammenfassung
Nicht-Vitamin-K-antagonistische orale Antikoagulanzien (NOAK) sind als Inhibitoren von Faktor Xa (FXa) und Thrombin in der Behandlung und Prävention von Thrombosen etabliert. Es gibt jedoch zunehmend Hinweise darauf, dass die positiven Ergebnisse auf zusätzlichen pleiotropen Effekten beruhen, die über die Antikoagulation hinausgehen. Faktor Xa und Thrombin können proteaseaktivierte Rezeptoren (PAR) aktivieren, welche proinflammatorische und profibrotische Wirkungen vermitteln. Da PAR‑1 und PAR‑2 eine wichtige Rolle bei der Entstehung von Atherosklerose spielen, stellt die Hemmung dieses Signalwegs ein interessantes potenzielles Ziel dar, um das Fortschreiten von Atherosklerose und Fibrose zu inhibieren. Diese Übersichtsarbeit konzentriert sich auf die potenziellen pleiotropen Effekte der FXa-Hemmung durch Edoxaban, die in einer Vielzahl von Studien in verschiedenen In-vitro- und In-vivo-Testsystemen beobachtet wurden. Übereinstimmende Ergebnisse dieser Studien zeigten, dass Edoxaban die durch FXa und Thrombin induzierten proinflammatorischen und profibrotischen Effekte abschwächen und die Expression proinflammatorischer Zytokine verringern konnte. In einigen, aber nicht allen Experimenten konnte Edoxaban auch die Expression von PAR‑1 und PAR‑2 reduzieren. Weitere Studien sind erforderlich, um die klinischen Auswirkungen der von NOAKs vermittelten pleiotropen Effekte zu untersuchen.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors are well-established in the treatment and prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and are recommended as first-line anticoagulants for the prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in current guidelines [10, 14, 20, 39, 40]. AF induces hypercoagulability, formation of thrombi within the left atrial appendage, and prothrombotic endothelial changes, leading to significantly increased morbidity and mortality [4, 13, 15]. The activated factor X is a key player in haemostasis, is associated with activated factor V and phospholipids, and activates factor II (prothrombin) to thrombin (FIIa) (Fig. 1; [7]). There is growing evidence for the non-haemostatic effects of thrombin and FXa which are mediated via activation of G‑protein coupled protease-activated receptors (PARs) [6, 28]. Four known isoforms of protease-activated receptors, PAR-1–4, are expressed in various cell types at different expression levels. Thrombin activates PAR‑1 (as well as PAR‑3 and PAR-4), which is mainly expressed in smooth muscle cells, cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts and endothelial cells, but also in platelets and leukocytes [2, 9, 36]. FXa is an activator of PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 and was detected in endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and myocytes, while its expression in fibroblasts is unclear [2, 36]. Activation of PAR receptors exerts pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects in several cell types mediating atherosclerosis, atrial remodeling, cardiac hypertrophy and chronic inflammatory pulmonary disorders [6, 33, 36].
PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 are discussed as key receptors involved in atherosclerosis [37]. PARs are activated via serine proteases such as thrombin and FXa via cleavage of the receptor’s N‑terminus, with the N‑terminal cleavage product becoming a ligand of the PAR itself [9, 19]. The cleavage position depends on the protease and is crucial for the signaling pathway. At low concentrations, thrombin activates protein C, which binds to the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and thereby activates co-localized PAR‑1. This mediates protective and anti-inflammatory effects on the endothelium. At high thrombin concentrations, PAR‑1 is activated directly by thrombin via N‑terminal cleavage and mediates pro-inflammatory effects (Fig. 2). FXa can also bind to EPCR, activate PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 via N‑terminal cleavage, and thereby initiate pro-inflammatory signaling. In addition, PAR‑2 can be activated by tissue factor (TF)–activated factor V (FVa) complex [19].
Thus, the clinical impact of FXa and thrombin inhibition with non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) might go beyond their anticoagulatory effects and involve pleiotropic effects mediated via PAR signaling pathways. Over the past years, such potentially beneficial effects have been described for all NOACs [8, 16, 26, 32]; however, a comprehensive summary of the findings with edoxaban was not yet available. Therefore, this review focuses on potential pleiotropic effects of the FXa-inhibitor edoxaban.
Potential pleiotropic effects of edoxaban in inflammation, atherosclerosis, and stroke
Recently, pleiotropic effects of FXa inhibition via edoxaban have been experimentally tested in various in vitro human cell culture models as well as in vivo in different murine and canine models (Fig. 3).
Table 1 summarises the key findings from selected studies investigating the effects of edoxaban on PAR signaling pathways and inflammation.
The role of FXa inhibition with edoxaban in atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling
Vitamin K antagonists can expedite atherosclerosis and plaque formation due to vascular calcification [35]. In contrast, recent studies in an apolipoprotein E‑deficient (ApoE−/−) atherosclerotic mouse model suggest that NOACs do not induce valvular and arterial calcification processes [17, 30]. Interestingly, AF was also seen to interfere with occurrence of cardiac ischemia [11, 12]. The effect of edoxaban in comparison to warfarin on atherosclerosis, vascular remodeling and fibrosis was also investigated in a ApoE−/− mouse model [24]. Hypercholesterolaemia and atherosclerosis were induced by feeding with a cholesterol-rich high-fat diet. Animals received either edoxaban- or control chow. Compared to control, mice receiving edoxaban had significantly reduced amounts of plaque tissue in the aortic sinus and significantly reduced fibrosis. The reduction of fibrosis in Apo E−/− deficient mice was higher with edoxaban compared with warfarin. The reduction in plaque formation showed the same trend for edoxaban. However, mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6 [IL-6], interleukin 1β [IL-1β], tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNFα], and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 [MCP-1]) did not show pro-inflammatory effects of warfarin or anti-inflammatory effects of edoxaban in the ApoE−/− mouse model [24]. The authors discuss that this atherosclerosis model might not be sufficient to reveal significant effects in vascular inflammation [24]. However, the positive effects of edoxaban on fibrosis and plaque tissue are supported by findings of vasculo-protective effects of other NOACs [17, 22, 29, 30, 34].
Edoxaban also enhanced human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) growth in a dose-dependent manner. It did not show any pro-migratory or angiogenic effects on HUVEC cells itself but was able to counteract FXa-mediated migration of HUVEC cells in a wound healing assay and to partially counteract FXa-induced anti-angiogenic activity in a tube formation assay. These results suggest a stabilising effect of edoxaban on human endothelial cells in the presence of FXa. Functional adhesion of platelets or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to a HUVEC monolayer was tested in absence or presence of edoxaban, FXa or their combination, as PBMC adhesion is associated with atherogenesis and vascular inflammation. Edoxaban inhibited FXa- and TNFα-induced adhesion of platelets or PBMCs to a HUVEC monolayer and was able to reduce both PBMC and platelet adhesion in a concentration-dependent manner even under basal conditions. When further exploring the underlying pathway, mRNA analysis showed a FXa-induced upregulation of the expression of three cell adhesion molecules, intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), and E‑selectin (SELE). Edoxaban did not alter these expression levels but counteracted FXa-induced upregulation. The upregulation of VCAM‑1 and SELE seemed to be mediated by PAR‑1 and 2 (in case of SELE only by PAR-2), while ICAM‑1 did not seem to be regulated via the two PAR receptors. For all three adhesion molecules an involvement of NF-κB and PI3K activation was shown. The authors conclude that if these findings are confirmed in an in vivo setting, edoxaban might counteract the effects of pro-inflammatory factors released in the vessel and to reduce platelet adhesion and might therefore contribute to a probable cardioprotective benefit [1].
Effects of FXa inhibition with edoxaban on atrial fibrosis
Previously, FXa has been shown to be associated with the activation of inflammatory signaling in human atrial tissue, leading to the development of atrial fibrotic remodeling [6]. The effect of edoxaban on atrial fibrosis was studied in a canine model for congestive heart failure [38]. AF was induced in beagles implanted with pacemakers. After implantation, animals received either edoxaban, placebo, or no medication for 19 days. In animals in the edoxaban and placebo groups, but not in sham animals, ventricular tachypacing (VTP) was started 7 days after pacemaker implantation and given for 14 days. After 14 days of VTP, animals in the placebo group showed significantly prolonged duration of AF episodes compared to sham beagles, whereas this effect was attenuated by treatment with edoxaban versus placebo. Inducibility of AF was comparable between the three groups. While VTP significantly increased the atrial fibrotic area in both the edoxaban and the placebo group, the fibrotic response was significantly attenuated with edoxaban versus placebo. As myocardial fibrosis has been strongly associated with FXa and PAR‑2 signaling [2], the investigators measured PAR‑2 expression in the tissue of the left atrial wall and found significantly increased levels in placebo-treated animals compared to sham, whereas there was no increase in PAR‑2 expression in the atria of edoxaban-treated animals. Similar results were observed for expression of fibronectin in atrial wall tissue. The authors concluded that edoxaban can inhibit VTP-induced progression of AF and reduce structural remodeling by suppression of PAR‑2 and fibronectin upregulation as well as atrial fibrosis [38].
A murine model of angiotensin II (AngII) -induced AF was used to investigate whether inhibition of FXa with edoxaban has anti-arrhythmic and anti-fibrotic effects and can therefore oppose the development or progression of AF (Mollenhauer and Rudolph, first published here). These data have not been published elsewhere before; therefore, results are described in more detail below. AF was induced in mice by subcutaneous AngII administration via osmotic minipumps. After implantation of the minipumps, mice received cereals impregnated with edoxaban 0.25 mg/animal/day in 0.5% methylcellulose or vehicle solution (0.5% methylcellulose). At 14 days after AngII, electrophysiological atrial stimulation resulted in an increased number and length of AF episodes compared to vehicle-treated animals (Fig. 4a,b). Treatment with edoxaban attenuated AngII-induced vulnerability for AF episodes and reduced duration of AF episodes (p < 0.05 for Edo + AngII vs. AngII). In this study, edoxaban did not reduce AngII-induced atrial fibrosis or attenuate AngII-induced atrial collagen I expression (Fig. 5a,b). Immunoblotting of isolated atria showed a trend towards enhanced total and activated PAR‑2 expression upon treatment with AngII, which could not be attenuated by treatment with edoxaban (Fig. 5c,d). However, AngII-mediated increases in plasma cytokine levels of thrombopoetin, interleukin (IL)-17, IL‑4, interferon (INF) γ, IL-5- and MCP‑5 were significantly attenuated with edoxaban (p < 0.05 for AngII + Edo vs. AngII) (Fig. 6). These findings suggest an important role of anti-inflammatory processes contributing to the positive effects of edoxaban in AF development. Yet, the underlying mechanism remains unclear.
Effects of NOACs on atrial repolarizing potassium channels
Treatment with edoxaban has been associated with a significant reduction in death from cardiovascular causes in patients with AF, supported by a tendency to also reduce all-cause death in these patients [10]. In experiments investigating direct effects of edoxaban on potassium channels as potential targets for antiarrhythmic therapy, human genes encoding for cardiac potassium channels KV11.1, KV1.5, KV4.3, Kir2.1, Kir2.2 and K2P2.1 were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes [41]. Currents were measured in the absence and presence of NOACs using voltage clamp electrophysiology. Edoxaban did not significantly affect peak current amplitudes nor current-voltage relationships of the investigated channels. Similar results were seen for the other NOACs. While direct interactions between NOACs and cardiac potassium channels are not likely to contribute to the positive clinical outcomes, indirect effects on cardiac potassium channels and their potential signaling pathways still need to be investigated further [41].
FXa as a mediator of pro-inflammatory effects and mitochondrial alterations via PAR signaling in human alveolar cells
Potential anti-inflammatory effects of edoxaban in the development of chronic lung diseases were studied using a human type II alveolar epithelial cell model (A549). The investigators could show that FXa activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and induced increased expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL‑8, ICAM‑1, and MCP‑1 [5]. Vorapaxar, a PAR‑1 inhibitor, and edoxaban were both effective in preventing the induction of FXa-mediated activation of ERK1/2 as well as of IL‑8, ICAM‑1, and MCP‑1. Of note, the PAR‑2 inhibitor GB83 did not counteract FXa-mediated ERK1/2-activation and even had an additional stimulatory effect on the expression of the three inflammatory molecules. As the inflammatory gene expression partly depends on mitochondrial function, the effect of exogenous FXa on mitochondrial oxygen consumption in epithelial cells was measured. FXa reduced mitochondrial oxygen consumption, which is an indicator for restricted capability of ATP generation in mitochondria. Again, administration of edoxaban or vorapaxar prevented the decrease in oxygen consumption and therefore the impairment of mitochondrial function. However, further analysis of caspase3 activity and mRNA expression of apoptosis markers showed that treatment with FXa did not induce apoptosis in two different human lung epithelial cell lines (A549 and Calu3) and did not affect metabolic cellular activity in human epithelial cells [5]. Interestingly, FXa induced intracellular signaling resulting in apoptosis in epithelial tumor cells. These differential findings might be due to a dose-dependency of the cellular effects of FXa [5].
Anti-FXa-mediated effects on ischaemic stroke severity and blood–brain barrier inflammation
Patients with AF who already experienced a previous ischaemic stroke are at increased risk of cerebrovascular events [31]. Edoxaban has proven to be as effective as warfarin in secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation, while significantly reducing the risk of developing intracranial haemorrhage by approximately 50% compared to warfarin [31]. Anti-inflammatory effects of edoxaban were also seen post-stroke in a murine model [3]. FXa and activation of thrombin could mediate inflammatory processes via PAR‑1, 2 and 4 [27]. PAR‑1 and 4 mediated activation of macrophages and induced pro-inflammatory cytokine expression and dysfunction of the blood–brain barrier [23]. Potential effects of FXa inhibition by edoxaban on inflammation and blood–brain barrier function in acute stroke were studied in the model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice treated with edoxaban, the vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon, or vehicle only [3]. Edoxaban significantly reduced the infarct volume compared to phenprocoumon or vehicle. This was accompanied by better neurological and functional outcomes after stroke compared to control. Furthermore, edoxaban significantly reduced blood–brain barrier leakage and ipsilateral formation of brain edema. The cerebral expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL‑6 and IL-1β was significantly reduced with edoxaban. In addition, only treatment with edoxaban but not vitamin K antagonists resulted in a significant reduction in macrophages and microglia invading the brain parenchyma through the blood–brain barrier. Experimental data from this study suggest that treatment with edoxaban has anti-inflammatory and blood–brain barrier protecting effects and might be beneficial in attenuating ischaemic stroke pathology [3].
The role of factor Xa and PAR2 in diabetic nephropathy
The role of FXa and PAR‑2 in diabetic nephropathy has been investigated in murine and podocyte models. [25]. To model diabetic nephropathy, mice with Akita mutation in the insulin 2 gene and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) knockout were used. Diabetes mellitus (DM) increased renal expression of FX mRNA and FXa activity in the murine urine as well as an increase in FXa expression in glomerular macrophages [25]. Inhibition of FXa by administration of edoxaban ameliorated diabetic nephropathy in the eNOS−/− DM mouse model and reduced the expression of the profibrotic and pro-inflammatory genes Pai1, Col1, Col4, and Tnfa as well as expression of Par1 and Par2. Par2 expression in the kidneys was increased in eNOS−/− DM mice, and lack of Par2 was shown to also ameliorate diabetic nephropathy. Interestingly, inhibition of FXa with edoxaban and lack of Par2 expression did not have additive anti-inflammatory effects. The results suggest that activation of FXa and PAR‑2 worsens diabetic nephropathy through an enhanced inflammatory response. Edoxaban reduced the severity of diabetic nephropathy, but could not fully reverse it [25].
Effects of FXa inhibition with edoxaban on tumor growth
The suppression of the PAR‑2 signaling pathway via FXa inhibition was subject to a study [21] investigating the effect of NOACs on tumor growth in a colorectal cancer mouse model. Colorectal carcinoma cells (Colon26 cell line) were transplanted into mice by subcutaneous inoculation. Colon26-inoculated mice treated with orally administered edoxaban or other direct oral anticoagulants developed significantly smaller tumors compared to water-treated controls. With edoxaban, tumor volume was reduced to approximately 28% of the tumor volume in control animals. Of note, the tumor size observed in edoxaban-treated animals was also significantly lower than in animals treated with two other NOACs. Further investigations on the potential underlying pathway found that edoxaban significantly decreased plasma levels of the pro-inflammatory factors IL‑6 and matrix metalloproteinase‑2 (MMP-2) in Colon26-inoculated mice compared to water-treated controls, of the pro-tumorigenic factors TF and plasminogen activator inhibitor‑1 (PAI-1), several markers for tumor growth, and PAR‑1 levels (however, not PAR‑2 levels). While apoptosis was increased in the tumor tissue of water-treated Colon26-inoculated mice, edoxaban increased the number of apoptotic cells, as well as the expression level of p53 protein, a transcription factor regulating cell proliferation and apoptosis. The authors hypothesize that inhibition of the PAR‑2 pathway with edoxaban results in an upregulation of p53 and therefore in increased apoptosis in tumor tissue. The authors point out that there have been contradictory findings on the effect of NOACs on tumor growth, so there may be differences between different types of tumors, types of cancer models, and NOACs used [21].
Perspective
To the authorsʼ knowledge, this is the first in-depth review of pleiotropic effects of edoxaban investigated in vitro and in experimental animal models. Several well-characterised models of pathophysiological settings were applied to explore edoxaban’s effects beyond its anticoagulatory properties.
Throughout the different models and cell types, edoxaban attenuated FXa- and thrombin induced pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic effects. Key findings were the reduction of FXa and thrombin-induced increases in pro-inflammatory cytokine expression ([1, 3, 21, 25]; Mollenhauer and Rudolph, first published here). Reductions of PAR‑1 and PAR‑2 levels were found by some, but not all studies. This might be due to different experimental models, cell types and setups used, but also to possible differences in the underlying mechanisms of edoxaban–PAR interaction in different cell types and tissues. It is still unknown to what extent atrial fibrosis is induced by PAR‑2 compared to other potential pathways; however, the findings suggest that edoxaban is a promising target for inhibition of the PAR‑2 pathway [38].
Similar non-haemostatic pleiotropic effects have been described for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran previously, confirming the anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects seen in the experiments included in this review [8, 16, 26, 32]. The findings with edoxaban are adding further evidence to the hypothesis that inhibition of FXa and thrombin with NOACs may be beneficial in preventing the progression of atherosclerosis, fibrosis, and other inflammatory conditions.
The test systems used are of broad variety and included in vitro (human epithelial cell culture, human alveolar cell lines, Xenopus Laevis oocytes) and animal in vivo experiments (knockout mouse systems, pharmacologically or electrically induced mouse and canine systems, cancer cell-inoculated mouse system). For animal models, also the method of edoxaban application varied between studies (gavage, oral via impregnated food) and one study used vitamin K1 as food supplement for the vitamin K antagonist control group to keep mice healthy. This might also explain differences between the trials regarding the ability of edoxaban to attenuate FXa-induced regulation of cytokines and inflammatory processes. The concentrations of edoxaban used in the different models vary between the studies and differ from the dosages used in AF treatment. PAR receptors vary between different tissues as well as species [19]. Therefore, it is unclear to which extent results seen in in vitro, mouse or canine models can be translated into a therapeutic human setting.
The results of these experimental studies may also translate to clinical findings seen with edoxaban in randomized clinical trials and real-world data on the treatment and prevention of stroke and systemic embolic events: the significant reduction in cardiovascular death [10] and recurrent ischaemic stroke [31] compared to warfarin, or low rates of renal worsening seen with edoxaban after 2 years of treatment [18]. NOACs have also been shown to reduce the risk of stroke and systemic embolic embolism irrespective of the absence or presence of coronary artery disease [42]. Additional in vivo and clinical data will be needed to shed further light into the pleiotropic effects of edoxaban and other NOACs and their potential targets.
References
Almengló C, Mosquera-Garrote N, González-Peteiro M et al (2020) Edoxaban’s contribution to key endothelial cell functions. Biochem Pharmacol 178:114063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114063
Antoniak S, Pawlinski R, Mackman N (2011) Protease-activated receptors and myocardial infarction. TBMB 63:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.441
Bieber M, Foerster KI, Haefeli WE et al (2021) Treatment with Edoxaban Attenuates Acute Stroke Severity in Mice by Reducing Blood-Brain Barrier Damage and Inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22189893
Bukowska A, Hammwöhner M, Corradi D et al (2018) Atrial thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation. Herzschrittmachertherapie. Elektrophysiologie, vol 29, pp 76–83 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-017-0543-x
Bukowska A, Schild L, Bornfleth P et al (2020) Activated clotting factor X mediates mitochondrial alterations and inflammatory responses via protease-activated receptor signaling in alveolar epithelial cells. Eur J Pharmacol 869:172875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172875
Bukowska A, Zacharias I, Weinert S et al (2013) Coagulation factor Xa induces an inflammatory signalling by activation of protease-activated receptors in human atrial tissue. Eur J Pharmacol 718:114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.09.006
Cabral KP, Ansell J (2012) Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol 9:385–391. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2012.19
ten Cate H, Guzik TJ, Eikelboom J, Spronk HMH (2021) Pleiotropic actions of factor Xa inhibition in cardiovascular prevention: mechanistic insights and implications for anti-thrombotic treatment. Cardiovasc Res 117:2030–2044. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvaa263
D’Alessandro E, Scaf B, Munts C et al (2021) Coagulation Factor Xa Induces Proinflammatory Responses in Cardiac Fibroblasts via Activation of Protease-Activated Receptor‑1. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10112958
Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E et al (2013) Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med 369:2093–2104. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310907
Goette A, Borof K, Breithardt G et al (2022) Presenting Pattern of Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes of Early Rhythm Control Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 80:283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.058
Goette A, Bukowska A, Lillig C, Lendeckel U (2012) Oxidative Stress and Microcirculatory Flow Abnormalities in the Ventricles during Atrial Fibrillation. Front Physiol 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2012.00236
Goette A, Kalman JM, Aguinaga L et al (2016) EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE. Eur, vol 18. expert, consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterization, and clinical implication. EP, pp 1455–1490 https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw161
Goette A, Merino JL, Ezekowitz MD et al (2016) Edoxaban versus enoxaparin-warfarin in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (ENSURE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. The Lancet 388:1995–2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31474‑X
Gorenek B, Pelliccia A, Benjamin EJ et al (2017) European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)/European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR) position paper on how to prevent atrial fibrillation endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS). Eur J Prev Cardiol 24:4–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316676037
Gori AM, Camilleri E, Bertelli A et al (2022) Pleiotropic effects of anti-thrombotic therapies: have direct oral anticoagulants any anti-inflammatory effect? Bleeding Thromb Vasc Biol https://doi.org/10.4081/btvb.2022.50
van Gorp RH, Dijkgraaf I, Bröker V et al (2021) Off-target effects of oral anticoagulants—vascular effects of vitamin K antagonist and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dabigatran etexilate. J Thromb Haemost 19:1348–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15289
Gwechenberger M, Baron-Esquivias G, De Vries TAC et al (2021) Low rate of worsening renal function after 2 years of treatment with edoxaban in patients from the ETNA-AF-Europe study. Eur Heart J 42 (Supplement):2924. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2924
Heuberger DM, Schuepbach RA (2019) Protease-activated receptors (PARs): mechanisms of action and potential therapeutic modulators in PAR-driven inflammatory diseases. Thromb J 17:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-019-0194-8
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N et al (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 42:373–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
Hiramoto KAN, Nishioka J, Suzuki K (2023) Edoxaban, a Factor Xa-Specific Direct Oral Anticoagulant, Significantly Suppresses Tumor Growth in Colorectal Cancer Colon26-Inoculated BALB/c Mice. Th Open 07:e1–e13. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758855
Illkyu‑O. Lee, Mario T. Kratz, Stephan H. Schirmer et al (2012) The Effects of Direct Thrombin Inhibition with Dabigatran on Plaque Formation and Endothelial Function in Apolipoprotein E‑Deficient Mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 343:253. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.112.194837
Machida T, Dohgu S, Takata F et al (2017) Role of thrombin-PAR1-PKCθ/δ axis in brain pericytes in thrombin-induced MMP‑9 production and blood-brain barrier dysfunction in vitro. Neuroscience 350:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.026
Millenaar D, Bachmann P, Böhm M et al (2020) Effects of edoxaban and warfarin on vascular remodeling: Atherosclerotic plaque progression and collateral artery growth. Vasc Pharmacol 127:106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vph.2020.106661
Oe Y, Hayashi S, Fushima T et al (2016) Coagulation Factor Xa and Protease-Activated Receptor 2 as Novel Therapeutic Targets for Diabetic Nephropathy. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 36:1525–1533. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307883
Papadaki S, Tselepis AD (2019) Nonhemostatic Activities of Factor Xa: Are There Pleiotropic Effects of Anti-FXa Direct Oral Anticoagulants? Angiology 70:896–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319719840861
Popović M, Smiljanić K, Dobutović B et al (2012) Thrombin and vascular inflammation. Mol Cell Biochem 359:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-011-1024-x
Posma JJN, Posthuma JJ, Spronk HMH (2016) Coagulation and non-coagulation effects of thrombin. J Thromb Haemost 14:1908–1916. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13441
Posthuma JJ, Posma JJN, van Oerle R et al (2019) Targeting Coagulation Factor Xa Promotes Regression of Advanced Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein‑E Deficient Mice. Sci Rep 9:3909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40602-w
Rattazzi M, Faggin E, Bertacco E et al (2018) Warfarin, but not rivaroxaban, promotes the calcification of the aortic valve in ApoE−/− mice. Cardiovasc Ther 36:e12438. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-5922.12438
Rost NS, Giugliano RP, Ruff CT et al (2016) Outcomes With Edoxaban Versus Warfarin in Patients With Previous Cerebrovascular Events. Stroke 47:2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013540
Russo V, Fabiani D (2022) Put out the fire: The pleiotropic anti-inflammatory action of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants. Pharmacol Res 182:106335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106335
S. Borensztajn K, H. von der Thusen J, Arnold Spek C (2011) The Role of Coagulation in Chronic Inflammatory Disorders: A Jack of All Trades. Curr Pharm Des 17:9–16. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211795049813
Sanmartín M, Bellmunt S, Cosín-Sales J et al (2019) Role of rivaroxaban in the prevention of atherosclerotic events. Pharmacol, vol 12. Expert, Rev Clin, pp 771–780 https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2019.1637732
Schurgers LJ, Joosen IA, Laufer EM et al (2012) Vitamin K‑Antagonists Accelerate Atherosclerotic Calcification and Induce a Vulnerable Plaque Phenotype. Plos One 7:e43229. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043229
Spronk HMH, De Jong AM, Verheule S et al (2017) Hypercoagulability causes atrial fibrosis and promotes atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 38:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw119
Spronk HMH; P T; Siland, JE; Prochaska, JH; Winters, J; van der Wal, AC; Posthuma, JJ; Lowe, G; d’Alessandro, E; Wenzel, P; Coenen, DM; Reitsma, PH; Ruf, W; van Gorp, RH; Koenen, RR; Vajen, T; Alshaikh, NA; Wolberg, AS; Macrae, FL; Asquith, N; Heemskerk, J; Heinzmann, A; Moorlag, M; Mackman, N; van der Meijden, P; Meijers, JCM; Heestermans, M; Renné, T; Dólleman, S; Chayouâ, W; Ariëns, RAS; Baaten, CC; Nagy, M; Kuliopulos, A; Posma, JJ; Harrison, P; Vries, MJ; Crijns, HJGM; Dudink, EAMP; Buller, HR; Henskens, YMC; Själander, A; Zwaveling, S; Erküner, O; Eikelboom, JW; Gulpen, A; Peeters, FECM; Douxfils, J; Olie, RH; Baglin, T; Leader, A; Schotten, U; Scaf, B; van Beusekom, HMM; Mosnier, LO; van der Vorm, L; Declerck, P; Visser, M; Dippel, DWJ; Strijbis, VJ; Pertiwi, K; ten Cate-Hoek, AJ; ten Cate, H (2018) Atherothrombosis and Thromboembolism: Position Paper from the Second Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 118:229–250. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH17-07-0492
Tsujino Y, Sakamoto T, Kinoshita K et al (2019) Edoxaban suppresses the progression of atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation in a canine congestive heart failure model. Heart Vessels 34:1381–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01377-2
Van Mieghem NM, Unverdorben M, Hengstenberg C et al (2021) Edoxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonist for Atrial Fibrillation after TAVR. N Engl J Med 385:2150–2160. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2111016
Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Eckardt L et al (2019) Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet 394:1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31872-0
Wiedmann F, Schlund D, Kraft M et al (2020) Electrophysiological effects of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants on atrial repolarizing potassium channels. Ep Eur 22:1409–1418. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa129
Zelniker TA, Ruff CT, Antman EM, Giugliano RP (2019) The efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 8:554–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872618796990
Acknowledgements
Editorial and medical writing support was provided by Dr. Katrin Domes-Martin, Germany, and was funded by Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
A. Goette: EU Grant Horizon 2020 MAESTRIA Consortium; grant number 965286. Speaker fees von Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer Health Care, Berlin Chemie, Biotronik, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS/Pfizer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, und Omeicos. M. Böhm is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; TTR 219, project number 322900939) and reports personal fees from Abbott, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Novartis, ReCor, Servier and Vifor during the conduct of the study. M. Meier is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Deutschland GmbH. M. Lamparter is an employee of Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH. The work of V. Rudolph and M. Mollenhauer was supported by an unrestricted grant from Daiichi Sankyo. The work of M. Mollenhauer was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MO 3438/2-1) and the Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (B-12).
Animal studies in mice with results first presented in this review have been performed by M. Mollenhauer and V. Rudolph. All other animal studies included in this review and performed by any of the authors have been published elsewhere previously. All applicable international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. No studies with human participants were performed for this article. All studies mentioned were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case.
Additional information
Scan QR code & read article online
Rights and permissions
Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de.
About this article
Cite this article
Goette, A., Mollenhauer, M., Rudolph, V. et al. Pleiotropic effects of NOACs with focus on edoxaban: scientific findings and potential clinical implications. Herzschr Elektrophys 34, 142–152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00944-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00399-023-00944-5