Abstract
Analysis of abnormal phenotypes produced by different types of mutations has been crucial for our understanding of gene function. Some floxed alleles that retain a neomycin-resistance selection cassette (neo cassette) are not equivalent to wild-type alleles and provide useful experimental resources. Pax6 is an important developmental gene and the aim of this study was to determine whether the floxed Pax6 tm1Ued (Pax6 fl) allele, which has a retained neo cassette, produced any abnormal eye phenotypes that would imply that it differs from the wild-type allele. Homozygous Pax6 fl/fl and heterozygous Pax6 fl/+ mice had no overt qualitative eye abnormalities but morphometric analysis showed that Pax6 fl/fl corneas tended be thicker and smaller in diameter. To aid identification of weak effects, we produced compound heterozygotes with the Pax6 Sey-Neu (Pax6 −) null allele. Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes had more severe eye abnormalities than Pax6 +/− heterozygotes, implying that Pax6 fl differs from the wild-type Pax6 + allele. Immunohistochemistry showed that the Pax6 fl/− corneal epithelium was positive for keratin 19 and negative for keratin 12, indicating that it was abnormally differentiated. This Pax6 fl allele provides a useful addition to the existing Pax6 allelic series and this study demonstrates the utility of using compound heterozygotes with null alleles to unmask cryptic effects of floxed alleles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Analysis of genetic mutations has provided key insights in developmental genetics and an allelic series of different types of mutations provides a powerful way of studying gene function. Many new mouse alleles have been generated by conventional mutagenesis but some have also been produced as by-products when a neomycin-resistance selection cassette (neo cassette) is included in the construction of a floxed allele for Cre-loxP conditional knockout experiments. Retention of the neo cassette often reduces gene expression, sometimes causing hypomorphic phenotypes (Wassarman et al. 1997; Meyers et al. 1998; Nagy et al. 1998; Ashery-Padan et al. 2000; Levin and Meisler 2004; Walisser et al. 2004a, b; Moza et al. 2007; Kerr et al. 2008; Lin et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011) but it may also increase expression of a reporter transgene (Scarff et al. 2003). Sometimes new alleles are deliberately generated in this way but an abnormal phenotype is usually an unwelcome side effect of constructing a floxed allele so the neo selection cassette is often excised.
Pax6 is a semi-dominant gene with important roles in development of the eye, brain, nose, craniofacial tissues, pancreas, pituitary gland and pineal gland (Simpson and Price 2002; Favor et al. 2008). The floxed Pax6 tm1Ued allele (abbreviated to Pax6 fl) was originally produced to analyse these roles using a conditional knockout approach (Simpson et al. 2009) but the possibility that it might produce an abnormal phenotype has not been investigated.
Homozygous Pax6 −/− and heterozygous Pax6 +/− phenotypes have been well characterised. The mouse small eye mutation, Sey (Roberts 1967) was identified as a Pax6 − null allele and renamed Pax6 Sey (Hill et al. 1991). Homozygous Pax6 −/− null mice, such as Pax6 Sey/Sey and Pax6 Sey-Neu/Sey-Neu, die around the time of birth with no eyes, no nasal cavities and abnormal brain development (Hogan et al. 1986; Hill et al. 1991; Schmahl et al. 1993; Grindley et al. 1995).
In Pax6 +/− heterozygotes, the nasal cavities are unaffected, brain defects appear to be restricted to the subcommissural organ (Estivill-Torrus et al. 2001) but eyes show a wide range of abnormalities, including small size, iris hypoplasia, cataracts, a closed anterior chamber angle (irido-corneal angle) and corneal abnormalities that may include a persistent lens stalk, indicative of incomplete separation of the lens and corneal epithelium (Hogan et al. 1986; Hill et al. 1991; Grindley et al. 1995; van Raamsdonk and Tilghman 2000; Collinson et al. 2001; Baulmann et al. 2002). The adult mouse Pax6 +/− cornea shows progressive deterioration, leading to loss of transparency and this is probably caused partly by a stem cell deficiency. The corneal epithelium is thin and fragile with reduced keratin 12 expression, increased cell turnover, accumulation of goblet cells, abnormal cell movement and abnormal wound-healing (Ramaesh et al. 2003; Davis et al. 2003; Sivak et al. 2004; Collinson et al. 2004; Ramaesh et al. 2005, 2006; Leiper et al. 2006; Douvaras et al. 2013). The Pax6 +/− cornea is also invaded by sub-epithelial blood vessels with associated connective tissue (pannus) and inflammatory cells, which causes corneal opacities (Ramaesh et al. 2003).
The severity of Pax6 mutant phenotypes may be affected both by stochastic effects and the genetic background (Pritchard 1973; Quinn et al. 1997; Ramaesh et al. 2009). For example, in heterozygous Pax6 +/− mice, eye size may vary between left and right eyes as well as among different mice (Roberts 1967; Clayton and Campbell 1968). Also, selection for a more permissive combination of modifier genes, present in gene pools of outbred mouse colonies, might explain why eye abnormalities in outbred mice may be more severe than for the same genotypes on more defined genetic backgrounds (Ramaesh et al. 2009). Examples of unusually severe adult Pax6 +/− eye phenotypes include highly abnormal lenses on an undefined mixed genetic background (Fig. 18 in Clayton 1970; Clayton and Campbell 1968) and adhesions and other mesenchymal abnormalities in outbred CD-1 mice (Kanakubo et al. 2006).
The Pax6 fl allele was produced by inserting a neo cassette, flanked by two loxP sites, into Pax6 intron 4 (in sense orientation with respect to the endogenous Pax6 locus) and another loxP site was inserted into intron 6. Thus, Pax6 exons 5, 5a and 6, which encode the paired domain, were flanked by loxP sites. Exposure of this conditional null Pax6 fl allele to Cre-recombinase causes recombination of the loxP sites and deletion of exons 5, 5a and 6, which are needed for Pax6 function. Deletion of these exons is expected to cause a nonsense frame-shift mutation that converts the floxed Pax6 fl allele to the deleted Pax6 Δ form, which is functionally a null allele (Simpson et al. 2009).
Unlike Pax6 −/− and Pax6 +/−, the Pax6 fl/+, Pax6 fl/fl and Pax6 fl/− phenotypes have not been characterised. Despite the presence of the neo cassette in the Pax6 fl allele, homozygous Pax6 fl/fl mice were reported to be viable, fertile and phenotypically indistinguishable from wild-type mice (Simpson et al. 2009). Although the gross eye phenotype of Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes appeared to be normal, this was not investigated in detail and eye development is known to be particularly sensitive to both reduced and elevated Pax6 levels, resulting in a range of eye abnormalities (Hill et al. 1991; Schedl et al. 1996).
The aim of the present study was to use a more sensitive method to determine whether the Pax6 fl allele produced an abnormal eye phenotype. To compare the effects of a single Pax6 fl allele versus a single wild-type Pax6 + allele on eye phenotypes we crossed Pax6 fl/+ heterozygotes with Pax6 +/− mice, heterozygous for the Pax6 Sey-Neu (Pax6 −) null allele on the same genetically defined, inbred background. This revealed that eye phenotypes in Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes were more abnormal than those in Pax6 +/− heterozygous mice, implying that the Pax6 fl allele is not equivalent to the wild-type Pax6 + allele.
Materials and methods
Mice
Animal work was approved by the University of Edinburgh Ethical Review Committee and performed in accordance with UK Home Office regulations under project licenses PPL 60/3635 and PPL 60/4302. Heterozygous Pax6 +/Sey-Neu mice (abbreviated to Pax6 +/−) were maintained by crossing to inbred CBA/Ca mice (N > 20 backcross generations) and genotyped by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Quinn et al. 1996). Heterozygous Pax6 tm1Ued/+ (abbreviated to Pax6 fl/+) mice (Simpson et al. 2009) on an outbred CD-1 genetic background were crossed to CBA/Ca (N = 8) and genotyped by PCR (Simpson et al. 2009). (Unlike CBA/J and some CD-1 mice, the CBA/Ca inbred strain does not carry the Pde6b rd1 retinal degeneration mutation, which can be confused with other retinal defects.) Adult and fetal mice were produced from Pax6 fl/+ × Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/+ × Pax6 fl/+ crosses. The morning that a vaginal plug was found was defined as embryonic day (E) 0.5 and E14.5 fetuses were chilled in ice cold PBS, decapitated and tail tips used for genotyping. Adult mice were killed at 12 weeks by cervical dislocation following inhalation of gaseous isoflurane anaesthetic.
Histology and morphometric measurements
Fetal heads were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight at 4 °C and processed to paraffin wax. For adults, left and right eyes were removed immediately, rinsed, dried and weighed to determine the mean eye mass. The mean eye and corneal diameters were both calculated from two orthogonal measurements of each eye using a Wild M5A dissecting microscope fitted with a calibrated measuring graticule in one eyepiece. Eyes were then fixed in 4 % PFA overnight at 4 °C and processed to paraffin wax. One adult eye was sectioned per mouse in an anterior–posterior plane to produce 7 µm sections through the cornea, lens and retina. To avoid adult lenses shattering the wax block was kept wet during sectioning. Fetal heads were sectioned anterior–posterior in a horizontal plane to produce 7 µm sections through the developing eye that included cornea, lens, and retina. Morphological features were compared in sections using standard haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining. Tissue sections of adult eyes were photographed and measured using a calibrated Zeiss Axiovision 4.8 digital camera system on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 compound microscope. The average thickness of the whole cornea, corneal stroma (plus endothelium) and corneal epithelium were determined from measurements at two places, near the centre of the cornea, in sections close to the mid-section in one eye per mouse and the number of corneal epithelial cell layers was counted.
Immunohistochemical staining
Antibodies and methods used for immunohistochemical staining of Pax6, keratin 5, keratin 12 and keratin 19 were the same as those reported previously for mouse eyes (Dorà et al. 2014). Sections were dewaxed in Histoclear (Fisher Scientific), rehydrated through graded alcohols to water, incubated in 3 % hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 min. then washed in 0.1 % phosphate buffered saline-Tween (PBS-T). To unmask antibodies, slides were incubated in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0), in a 95 °C water bath for 35 min. then allowed to cool for 20 min. and washed in PBS. Sections were treated with 10 % blocking serum (species according to secondary antibody), 0.1 % bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 1 h. at room temperature then incubated with the primary antibody, overnight at 4 °C. Slides were washed in PBS, incubated in blocking serum (10 min.) then secondary antibody (45 min. at room temperature), washed in PBS and incubated with avidin-biotin reagent (ABC RTU Vectastain, Vector Labs PK-7100). Antibody was then visualised with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) stain (5.9 ml 20 mM Tris pH 7.6, 100 μl 50 mg/ml DAB, 1 μl H2O2). Finally, sections were lightly counterstained with haematoxylin, dehydrated and coverslips were mounted with DPX mounting medium (BDH from VWR). Control slides were treated with blocking serum in place of primary antibody but otherwise treated identically.
For Pax6, the primary mouse anti-Pax6 antibody (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa; DSHB Cat# pax6, RRID:AB_528427) was diluted 1:500 and the secondary antibody (Vector labs BA-9200 biotinylated goat anti-mouse) was diluted 1:200. For keratin 5 (K5), the primary rabbit anti-K5 antibody (Abcam ab53121) was diluted 1:100 and the secondary antibody (Vector Labs BA-1000, biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG) was diluted 1:200. For keratin 12 (K12), the primary goat anti-K12 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology sc-17101) was diluted 1:500 and the secondary antibody (Vector Labs BA-5000) biotinylated rabbit anti-goat IgG was diluted 1:200. For keratin 19 (K19), the primary rabbit anti-K19 antibody (Lifespan Biosciences LS-C3372) was diluted 1:200 and the goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody was the same as that used for K5.
Statistical analysis
Minimum group sizes were guided by previous experience and power calculations, using standard deviations from comparisons of other genotypes (Ramaesh et al. 2009) to ensure sufficient power to detect, as significant (P < 0.05), mean eye mass differences of 5 mg. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests, and non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis tests, followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests, were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5.0c (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, USA).
Results
Abnormal Pax6 fl/− eye phenotype
Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 +/− mice were crossed to produce offspring of four genotypes: Pax6 +/+ (wild-type, WT), Pax6 fl/+, Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/−. Homozygous Pax6 fl/fl mice, on a similar, predominantly CBA/Ca genetic background, were produced in a separate Pax6 fl/+ × Pax6 fl/+ cross. Phenotypes of Pax6 +/+ , Pax6 fl/+, Pax6 fl/fl, Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/− eyes are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. For both E14.5 fetuses and 12-week-old adults, heterozygous Pax6 fl/+ and homozygous Pax6 fl/fl eyes appeared to be grossly unaffected and qualitatively equivalent to Pax6 +/+ (wild-type). However, Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygous eyes were clearly more severely affected than Pax6 +/− heterozygotes. At E14.5 (Fig. 1), the most obvious abnormalities of heterozygous Pax6 +/− eyes were that the anterior chamber was not yet formed, as reported previously (Ramaesh et al. 2003), and some had an indentation in the middle of the cornea, indicative of a persistent lens stalk (lens-corneal plug). In contrast, lenses of E14.5 Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes eyes were small and usually did not protrude beyond the anterior of the optic cup. The anterior chamber had not formed and mesenchymal cells extended from the cornea into the anterior of the optic cup and coated the anterior of the lens. Persistent lens stalks, involving the surface ectoderm, were only seen in some of the eight E14.5 Pax6 fl/− eyes that were examined (e.g. Fig. 1f).
At 12 weeks, Pax6 +/+, Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl eyes all appeared grossly normal (Fig. 2a–c, i–k, m–o) apart from some common processing artefacts, which included separation of the retinal pigment epithelium from the neural retina and some lens damage. As described elsewhere (Ramaesh et al. 2003), Pax6 +/− eyes (Fig. 2d, l, p) showed a range of abnormalities, including slightly reduced size, hypoplastic irises, thinner corneal epithelium and sometimes a lens-corneal plug (persistent lens stalk). Adult Pax6 +/− eyes had an anterior chamber but, in some cases, the irido-corneal angle (anterior chamber angle) was closed, as reported previously (Baulmann et al. 2002). However, Pax6 fl/− eyes were much smaller and more severely affected (Fig. 2e–h, q–t). They had no ciliary body, anterior chamber or irido-corneal angle and a layer of pigmented tissue, with no pupil opening, adhered to the corneal endothelium. This is presumed to be an abnormal iris but a persistent pupillary membrane could also be present, as described for Pax6 Leca4/+ heterozygotes (Ramaesh et al. 2009). It is also possible that this is at least partly derived from the retinal pigment epithelium but we did not use markers to attempt to identify the origin of the pigmented layer. The Pax6 fl/− lens was small and dysplastic with vacuoles and sometimes adhesions to pigmented, presumptive iris tissue anteriorly and/or the retina posteriorly. In some Pax6 fl/− eyes a lens-corneal plug was present. The retina was severely dysplastic with, irregular layers, folds and rosettes (Fig. 2e) but the retinal pigment epithelium, adjacent to the neural retina, appeared grossly normal.
Quantitative comparisons of eye mass confirmed that heterozygous Pax6 +/− eyes were significantly smaller than wild-type Pax6 +/+ eyes (P < 0.001) but compound heterozygous Pax6 fl/− eyes were even smaller. Pax6 fl/− eye mass and diameter were significantly smaller than the other four genotypes (P < 0.001 in each case) but Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl genotypes did not differ significantly from Pax6 +/+ (Fig. 3a, b). The corneal diameter of Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes was smaller than the other four genotypes (P < 0.001 in each case) but it was also significantly smaller in Pax6 fl/fl than Pax6 +/+ (P < 0.01), Pax6 fl/+ (P < 0.001) and Pax6 +/− (P < 0.05), as shown in Fig. 3c. Furthermore, the relative corneal diameter (expressed as a percentage of eye diameter) was significantly smaller for Pax6 fl/− than Pax6 +/+ (P < 0.05), Pax6 fl/+ (P < 0.01) and Pax6 +/− (P < 0.05) but not Pax6 fl/fl (Fig. 3d). The Pax6 fl/fl relative corneal diameter was also significantly less than Pax6 +/+, Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 +/− (P < 0.001 in each case).
Morphometric measurements were also used to compare corneal thickness but variation within groups was relatively high and, as group sizes were small, these results are considered preliminary and are presented in the graphs included as Supplementary Fig. S1. Despite the small group sizes (thus low statistical power), there was also a clear trend for Pax6 fl/fl eyes to have thicker corneas than Pax6 +/+. Differences between these two genotypes were significant for the thickness of the corneal epithelium (P < 0.05) and whole cornea (P < 0.01) but not for the thickness of the corneal stroma (plus the thin corneal endothelium) or the number of corneal epithelial layers. Pax6 +/− mice are known to have thin and fragile corneal epithelia (Ramaesh et al. 2003) and the mean number of corneal epithelial cell layers was lowest for Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/−. However, for the small samples analysed here, only Pax6 fl/− and Pax6 fl/fl differed significantly (P < 0.05).
Immunohistochemical staining for Pax6 was positive in the lens (not shown), corneal epithelium and retina of all 5 genotypes (Fig. 4). Although nuclear staining appeared to be stronger in Pax6 +/+, Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl than Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/− sections, Pax6 levels were not compared quantitatively.
Abnormal expression of corneal epithelial markers in Pax6 fl/− mice
Keratin 5 (K5) is normally present in the mouse corneal epithelium, conjunctiva and the limbal epithelium, which is a junctional zone between these two tissues (Byrne and Fuchs 1993; Douvaras et al. 2012). Strong K5 immunostaining was present in these three ocular surface epithelia in all five genotypes and the central corneal epithelium is illustrated in Fig. 5a–e.
Keratin 19 (K19) is a marker of the mouse limbal epithelium and conjunctiva but not the central corneal epithelium (Yoshida et al. 2006). The limbal and peripheral corneal epithelia of all five genotypes stained positive for K19 (Fig. 5f–j). In the central corneal epithelia, K19 immunostaining was weak or absent in Pax6 +/+ , Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl genotypes (Fig. 5k–m), patchy in Pax6 +/− (Fig. 5n) but stronger and clearly above background levels in Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes (Fig. 5o).
Keratin 12 (K12) is a specific corneal epithelial marker (Liu et al. 1993) and K12 staining was present in the central corneal epithelia of Pax6 +/+ , Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl eyes (Fig. 5p–r). Some weak and patchy staining was present in the Pax6 +/− corneal epithelium (Fig. 5s) but K12 staining was absent from the Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygous corneal epithelium (Fig. 5t).
Discussion
Compound heterozygous Pax6 fl/− mice had much more severe eye abnormalities than Pax6 +/− heterozygotes and expression of K12 and K19 were also more severely affected in Pax6 fl/− corneas. K12 is normally only expressed in the corneal epithelium and is regulated by Pax6 (Liu et al. 1993; Shiraishi et al. 1998). Conversely, K19 is normally expressed in the mouse limbal epithelium and conjunctiva but not the corneal epithelium (Yoshida et al. 2006). Consistent with previous reports, the Pax6 +/− corneal epithelium showed weak, patchy and sparse K12 staining (Ramaesh et al. 2003, 2005) and patchy K19 staining (Douvaras et al. 2013). Although K12 and K19 immunostaining was normal in the Pax6 fl/+ and Pax6 fl/fl ocular surface, it was even more abnormal in Pax6 fl/− than in Pax6 +/−. The more strongly positive K19 staining and absence of K12 in the Pax6 fl/− central corneal epithelium suggests that it is abnormally differentiated. However, we did not determine whether cells in the Pax6 fl/− corneal epithelium expressed other specific limbal or conjunctival markers or test for hallmarks of conjunctivilisation. Together, the morphology and corneal immunohistochemistry results for Pax6 +/− and Pax6 fl/− eyes imply that the floxed Pax6 fl allele is not equivalent to the wild-type Pax6 + allele.
The observations that corneas in Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes were thicker and had a smaller diameter than normal indicates that an abnormal Pax6 fl phenotype is detectable in Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes as well as Pax6 fl/− compound heterozygotes but the Pax6 fl/fl phenotype is much less severe. Although Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes and Pax6 +/+ wild-type mice were produced by different genetic crosses, they were on very similar genetic backgrounds. Nevertheless, as sample sizes were small and corneal stromal thickness can be affected by histological processing, this evidence for an abnormal Pax6 fl/fl corneal phenotype should be considered preliminary. Apart from the subtle corneal differences revealed by morphometrics, there were no major qualitative morphological ocular abnormalities or aberrant K12 or K19 immunostaining in the corneal epithelium of Pax6 fl/+ or Pax6 fl/fl mouse eyes. The phenotypic evidence suggests that Pax6 fl is an abnormal allele with a minor effect on corneas of Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes but no effect on Pax6 fl/+ heterozygotes.
Most of the phenotypic abnormalities can be ordered as: −/− (anophthalmic; not shown) >fl/− > +/− > fl/fl > fl/+ = +/+ (normal). Although we have not investigated the molecular mechanisms, it is tempting to speculate how the different genotype-phenotype correlations could arise. For example, if this rank order of decreasing phenotype severity were caused by an equivalent rank order of increasing Pax6 levels, this would predict that the floxed Pax6 fl allele causes a relatively small quantitative reduction in Pax6 level, such that Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes have more Pax6 than Pax6 +/−.
The above phenotype severity rank order is consistent with the differences in eye size but it does not fit so well with the results for corneal diameter or corneal epithelial thickness. However, the floxed Pax6 fl allele might affect different tissues in different ways. Although the Pax6 − null allele only affects Pax6 quantitatively, Pax6 fl might cause both a quantitative effect and a qualitative difference in Pax6 protein or a difference in the ratio of Pax6 isoforms. Any such effects would be expected to be most pronounced in Pax6 fl/fl and Pax6 fl/− genotypes, where there was no wild-type allele, and might affect Pax6 fl/+ to a lesser extent but would not affect Pax6 +/− or Pax6 +/+. This is consistent with the smaller relative corneal diameter seen in Pax6 fl/fl and Pax6 fl/− genotypes. In principle, the results for corneal epithelial thickness could be explained by an interaction between two opposing effects. Low Pax6 levels produce a thin corneal epithelium in Pax6 +/− heterozygotes (Davis et al. 2003; Ramaesh et al. 2003) and this may also be the predominant effect in Pax6 fl/− heterozygotes. However, if Pax6 levels are higher, an altered Pax6 protein (or altered isoform ratio) might have the opposite effect in Pax6 fl/fl homozygotes but not in Pax6 fl/+ heterozygotes where wild-type protein is also present. Although such speculations, based on phenotypes, are useful for generating hypotheses, molecular investigations will be required to test these and other possibilities.
In contrast to the mildly abnormal Pax6 fl/fl and wild-type Pax6 fl/+ phenotypes reported here, a more overtly abnormal phenotype was reported for mice carrying a different floxed Pax6 allele (with the neo cassette in the intron between exons 6 and 7) and this was corrected by removing the neo cassette (cited in Ashery-Padan et al. 2000). Abnormal phenotypes have been reported for floxed alleles of other genes with retained neo cassettes (see Introduction) and some aberrant phenotypes have been attributed to altered gene expression caused by cryptic splice sites in the neo cassette (Nagy et al. 1998; Meyers et al. 1998). The retained neo cassette may also affect Pax6 expression in the floxed Pax6 fl allele, at least in the eye. K12 is regulated by Pax6 (Shiraishi et al. 1998; Liu et al. 1999) and, in humans, the Pax6(5a) isoform is known to be critical (Sasamoto et al. 2016). In principle, therefore, both the abnormal Pax6 fl/− eye morphology and the absence of K12 immunostaining in the Pax6 fl/− corneal epithelium could be mediated via direct effects on Pax6, such as reduced levels or altered ratios of different isoforms. However, we have not investigated the mechanisms that underlie the abnormal Pax6 fl/− phenotype.
Cryptic hypomorphic phenotypes have been unmasked for floxed alleles (fl) of Nodal and Smad2 with retained neo or β-geo selection cassettes, using compound heterozygotes with null alleles (Lowe et al. 2001; Liu et al. 2004). Like Pax6 fl, these were identified as abnormal alleles because fl/null compound heterozygotes had a more severe phenotype than +/null heterozygotes, even though fl/fl homozygotes appeared to be normal. The unmasking of cryptic hypomorphic phenotypes produced by floxed alleles of Nodal, Smad2 and now Pax6, using compound heterozygotes with null alleles, demonstrates that this approach is likely to be useful for identifying other floxed alleles with weak effects that are otherwise difficult to detect.
The availability of different Pax6 alleles provides a useful resource for the analysis of the roles of Pax6 in various tissues because Pax6 − null alleles alone are not always sufficiently informative. The anophthalmia and early lethality of Pax6 −/− homozygous mean that this genotype is only useful for early developmental stages unless used in mouse chimaeras (Quinn et al. 1996) and the Pax6 +/− genotype has only minor effects in tissues other than the eye. However, by using combinations of different mouse Pax6 alleles, different phenotypes can be produced to suit the experimental requirements. Early studies showed that the phenotypes of heterozygous Pax6 +/− mice were similar to some human inherited conditions caused by PAX6 mutants, including aniridia and Peters’ anomaly (Hill et al. 1991; Ton et al. 1991; Glaser et al. 1994; Hanson et al. 1994; Nishida et al. 1995; Davis et al. 2003; Ramaesh et al. 2003). The availability of a wider array of different mouse Pax6 alleles may also provide models for some atypical human phenotypes that are caused by PAX6 missense mutations (Hanson et al. 1999; Hingorani et al. 2012).
A large allelic series of mouse Pax6 mutants has been assembled, mainly from conventional mutagenesis screens (Roberts 1967; Hogan et al. 1986; Hill et al. 1991; Lyon et al. 2000; Favor and Neuhauser-Klaus 2000; Favor et al. 2001; Thaung et al. 2002; Favor et al. 2008, 2009; Puk et al. 2013). As already noted, Pax6 −/− null homozygotes are anophthalmic and die around birth and heterozygotes have significant ocular defects including microphthalmia (Hill et al. 1991; Grindley et al. 1995). Four hypomorphic alleles (Pax6 coop, Pax6 4Neu, Pax6 7Neu and Pax6 132-14Neu) with less severe phenotypes have already been produced in mutagenesis experiments (Lyon et al. 2000; Favor et al. 2001, 2008). However, none of these is equivalent to the Pax6 fl allele reported here. Pax6 coop, Pax6 4Neu and Pax6 7Neu have more severe phenotypes. Homozygotes are anophthalmic and die perinatally while heterozygotes have significant overt eye abnormalities. Pax6 132-14Neu has a weaker effect than Pax6 coop, Pax6 4Neu or Pax6 7Neu but a stronger effect than Pax6 fl. Homozygous Pax6 132-14Neu/132-14Neu mice are viable and fertile but eye defects are more severe than in Pax6 +/− heterozygotes and, although some Pax6 132-14Neu/+ heterozygotes have no overt eye defects, others have a range of relatively minor abnormalities.
Two other alleles affect specific Pax6 isoforms. Mice heterozygous for a targeted deletion of the Pax6(5a) isoform develop iris hypoplasia and homozygotes have additional minor defects of the iris, retina, lens and corneal stroma but eye size is not reduced (Singh et al. 2002). Unlike the Pax6 fl/− phenotype, however, no ocular defects developed until after birth. The T(2;14)1GSo reciprocal translocation disrupts Pax6 regulation, causing elevated expression of the Pax6 P1’ isoform that results in thickening of the corneal epithelium and stroma (Elso et al. 2013). Further work is required to determine whether the floxed Pax6 fl allele shares features with T(2;14)1GSo translocation mice, which might predict the involvement of altered ratios of the Pax6 P1’ isoform.
Existing mouse hypomorphic alleles have already proved useful for analysis of Pax6 gene function in eye development. Combinations of Pax6 4Neu, Pax6 7Neu, Pax6 132-14Neu and other Pax6 alleles in various compound heterozygotes have produced a range of ocular phenotypes that have been ranked and grouped into three phenotype classes (Favor et al. 2008). Pax6 fl now provides a novel addition to the existing Pax6 allelic series that, in combination with other alleles, should be useful for refining these phenotype classifications.
References
Ashery-Padan R, Marquardt T, Zhou XL, Gruss P (2000) Pax6 activity in the lens primordium is required for lens formation and for correct placement of a single retina in the eye. Genes Dev 14(21):2701–2711
Baulmann DC, Ohlmann A, Flugel-Koch C, Goswami S, Cvekl A, Tamm ER (2002) Pax6 heterozygous eyes show defects in chamber angle differentiation that are associated with a wide spectrum of other anterior eye segment abnormalities. Mech Dev 118(1–2):3–17
Byrne C, Fuchs E (1993) Probing keratinocyte and differentiation specificity of the human K5 promoter in vitro and in transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol 13(6):3176–3190
Clayton RM (1970) Problems of differentiation in the vertebrate lens. Curr Top Dev Biol 5:115–180
Clayton RM, Campbell JC (1968) Small eye, a mutant in the house mouse apparently affecting the synthesis of extracellular membranes. J Physiol 198(Suppl.):74P–75P
Collinson JM, Quinn JC, Buchanan MA, Kaufman MH, Wedden SE, West JD, Hill RE (2001) Primary defects in the lens underlie complex anterior segment abnormalities of the Pax6 heterozygous eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(17):9688–9693
Collinson JM, Chanas SA, Hill RE, West JD (2004) Corneal development, limbal stem cell function, and corneal epithelial cell migration in the Pax6 +/− mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45(4):1101–1108
Davis J, Duncan MK, Robison WG, Piatigorsky J (2003) Requirement for Pax6 in corneal morphogenesis: a role in adhesion. J Cell Sci 116(11):2157–2167
Dorà NJ, Collinson JM, Hill RE, West JD (2014) Hemizygous Le-Cre transgenic mice have severe eye abnormalities on some genetic backgrounds in the absence of LoxP sites. PLoS One 9(10):e109193. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109193
Douvaras P, Webb S, Whitaker DA, Dorà N, Hill RE, Dorin JR, West JD (2012) Rare corneal clones in mice suggest an age-related decrease of stem cell activity and support the limbal epithelial stem cell hypothesis. Stem Cell Res 8(1):109–119. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2011.08.007
Douvaras P, Mort RL, Edwards D, Ramaesh K, Dhillon B, Morley SD, Hill RE, West JD (2013) Increased corneal epithelial turnover contributes to abnormal homeostasis in the Pax6 +/− mouse model of aniridia. PLoS One 8(8):e71117. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071117
Elso C, Lu X, Weisner PA, Thompson HL, Skinner A, Carver E, Stubbs L (2013) A reciprocal translocation dissects roles of Pax6 alternative promoters and upstream regulatory elements in the development of pancreas, brain, and eye. Genesis 51(9):630–646. doi:10.1002/dvg.22409
Estivill-Torrus G, Vitalis T, Fernandez-Llebrez P, Price DJ (2001) The transcription factor Pax6 is required for development of the diencephalic dorsal midline secretory radial glia that form the subcommissural organ. Mech Dev 109(2):215–224. doi:10.1016/s0925-4773(01)00527-5
Favor J, Neuhauser-Klaus A (2000) Saturation mutagenesis for dominant eye morphological defects in the mouse Mus musculus. Mamm Genome 11(7):520–525
Favor J, Peters H, Hermann T, Schmahl W, Chatterjee B, Neuhauser-Klaus A, Sandulache R (2001) Molecular characterization of Pax6 2Neu through Pax6 10Neu: an extension of the Pax6 allelic series and the identification of two possible hypomorph alleles in the mouse Mus musculus. Genetics 159(4):1689–1700
Favor J, Gloeckner CJ, Neuhauser-Klaus A, Pretsch W, Sandulache R, Saule S, Zaus I (2008) Relationship of Pax6 activity levels to the extent of eye development in the mouse, Mus musculus. Genetics 179(3):1345–1355
Favor J, Bradley A, Conte N, Janik D, Pretsch W, Reitmeir P, Rosemann M, Schmahl W, Wienberg J, Zaus I (2009) Analysis of Pax6 contiguous gene deletions in the mouse, Mus musculus, identifies regions distinct from Pax6 responsible for extreme small-eye and belly-spotting phenotypes. Genetics 182(4):1077–1088. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.104562
Glaser T, Jepeal L, Edwards JG, Young SR, Favor J, Maas R (1994) PAX6 gene dosage effects in a family with congenital cataracts, aniridia, anophthalmia and central nervous system defects. Nat Genet 7:463–471
Grindley JC, Davidson DR, Hill RE (1995) The role of Pax-6 in eye and nasal development. Development 121:1433–1442
Hanson IM, Fletcher JM, Jordan T, Brown A, Taylor D, Adams RJ, Punnett HH, van Heyningen V (1994) Mutations at the PAX6 locus are found in heterogeneous anterior segment malformations including Peters’ anomaly. Nat Genet 6(2):168–173
Hanson I, Churchill A, Love J, Axton R, Moore T, Clarke M, Meire F, van Heyningen V (1999) Missense mutations in the most ancient residues of the PAX6 paired domain underlie a spectrum of human congenital eye malformations. Hum Mol Genet 8(2):165–172
Hill RE, Favor J, Hogan BLM, Ton CCT, Saunders GF, Hanson IM, Prosser J, Jordan T, Hastie ND, van Heyningen V (1991) Mouse small eye results from mutations in a paired-like homeobox-containing gene. Nature 354(6354):522–525
Hingorani M, Hanson I, van Heyningen V (2012) Aniridia. Eur J Hum Genet 20(10):1011–1017. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.100
Hogan BM, Horsburgh G, Cohen J, Hetherington CM, Fisher G, Lyon MF (1986) Small eyes (Sey): a homozygous lethal mutation on chromosome 2 which affects the differentiation of both lens and nasal placodes in the mouse. J Embryol Exp Morphol 97:95–110
Kanakubo S, Nomura T, Yamamura KI, Miyazaki JI, Tamai M, Osumi N (2006) Abnormal migration and distribution of neural crest cells in Pax6 heterozygous mutant eye, a model for human eye diseases. Genes Cells 11(8):919–933
Kerr B, Alvarez-Saavedra M, Saez MA, Saona A, Young JI (2008) Defective body-weight regulation, motor control and abnormal social interactions in Mecp2 hypomorphic mice. Hum Mol Genet 17(12):1707–1717. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddn061
Leiper LJ, Walczysko P, Kucerova R, Ou JX, Shanley LJ, Lawson D, Forrester JV, McCaig CD, Zhao M, Collinson JM (2006) The roles of calcium signaling and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in a Pax6 +/− mouse model of epithelial wound-healing delay. BMC Biol 4:27
Levin SI, Meisler MH (2004) Floxed allele for conditional inactivation of the voltage-gated sodium channel Scn8a (Nav1.6). Genesis 39(4):234–239. doi:10.1002/gene.20050
Lin BC, Nguyen LP, Walisser JA, Bradfield CA (2008) A hypomorphic allele of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-associated protein-9 produces a phenocopy of the Ahr null mouse. Mol Pharmacol 74(5):1367–1371. doi:10.1124/mol.108.047068
Liu CY, Zhu G, Westerhausenlarson A, Converse R, Kao CWC, Sun TT, Kao WWY (1993) Cornea-specific expression of K12 keratin during mouse development. Curr Eye Res 12(11):963–974
Liu JJ, Kao WWY, Wilson SE (1999) Corneal epithelium-specific mouse keratin K12 promoter. Exp Eye Res 68(3):295–301
Liu Y, Festing MH, Hester M, Thompson JC, Weinstein M (2004) Generation of novel conditional and hypornorphic alleles of the Smad2 gene. Genesis 40(2):118–123. doi:10.1002/gene.20072
Lowe LA, Yamada S, Kuehn MR (2001) Genetic dissection of nodal function in patterning the mouse embryo. Development 128(10):1831–1843
Lyon MF, Bogani D, Boyd Y, Guillot P, Favor J (2000) Further genetic analysis of two autosomal dominant mouse eye defects, Ccw and Pax6 coop. Mol Vis 6(25):199–203
Meyers EN, Lewandoski M, Martin GR (1998) An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination. Nat Genet 18(2):136–141. doi:10.1038/ng0298-136
Moza M, Mologni L, Trokovic R, Faulkner G, Partanen J, Carpen O (2007) Targeted deletion of the muscular dystrophy gene myotilin does not perturb muscle structure or function in mice. Mol Cell Biol 27(1):244–252. doi:10.1128/mcb.00561-06
Nagy A, Moens C, Ivanyi E, Pawling J, Gertsenstein M, Hadjantonakis AK, Pirity M, Rossant J (1998) Dissecting the role of N-myc in development using a single targeting vector to generate a series of alleles. Curr Biol 8(11):661–664
Nishida K, Kinoshita S, Ohashi Y, Kuwayama Y, Yamamoto S (1995) Ocular surface abnormalities in aniridia. Am J Ophthalmol 120(3):368–375
Pritchard DJ (1973) A biochemical investigation of a dominant mutation associated with cellular invasiveness. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh
Puk O, Yan XH, Sabrautzki S, Fuchs H, Gailus-Durner V, de Angelis MH, Graw J (2013) Novel small-eye allele in paired box gene 6 (Pax6) is caused by a point mutation in intron 7 and creates a new exon. Mol Vis 19:877–884
Quinn JC, West JD, Hill RE (1996) Multiple functions for Pax6 in mouse eye and nasal development. Genes Dev 10(4):435–446
Quinn JC, West JD, Kaufman MH (1997) Genetic background effects on dental and other craniofacial abnormalities in homozygous small eye (Pax6 Sey /Pax6 Sey) mice. Anat Embryol 196:311–321
Ramaesh T, Collinson JM, Ramaesh K, Kaufman MH, West JD, Dhillon B (2003) Corneal abnormalities in Pax6 +/− small eye mice mimic human aniridia-related keratopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(5):1871–1878
Ramaesh T, Ramaesh K, Collinson JM, Chanas SA, Dhillon B, West JD (2005) Developmental and cellular factors underlying corneal epithelial dysgenesis in the Pax6 +/− mouse model of aniridia. Exp Eye Res 81(2):224–235
Ramaesh T, Ramaesh K, Leask R, Springbett A, Riley SC, Dhillon B, West JD (2006) Increased apoptosis and abnormal wound-healing responses in the heterozygous Pax6 +/− mouse cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(5):1911–1917
Ramaesh T, Williams SE, Paul C, Ramaesh K, Dhillon B, West JD (2009) Histopathological characterisation of effects of the mouse Pax6 Leca4 missense mutation on eye development. Exp Eye Res 89(2):263–273
Roberts RC (1967) Small eyes—a new dominant eye mutant in the mouse. Genet Res 9:121–122
Sasamoto Y, Hayashi R, Park S-J, Saito-Adachi M, Suzuki Y, Kawasaki S, Quantock AJ, Nakai K, Tsujikawa M, Nishida K (2016) PAX6 isoforms, along with reprogramming factors, differentially regulate the induction of cornea-specific genes. Sci Rep 6:20807
Scarff KL, Ung KS, Sun JR, Bird PI (2003) A retained selection cassette increases reporter gene expression without affecting tissue distribution in SPI3 knockout/GFP knock-in mice. Genesis 36(3):149–157. doi:10.1002/gene.10210
Schedl A, Ross A, Lee M, Engelkamp D, Rashbass P, van Heyningen V, Hastie ND (1996) Influence of Pax6 gene dosage on development—overexpression causes severe eye abnormalities. Cell 86(1):71–82
Schmahl W, Knoedlseder M, Favor J, Davidson D (1993) Defects in neuronal migration and the pathogenesis of cortical malformations are associated with Small eye (Sey) in the mouse, a point mutation of the Pax-6-locus. Acta Neuropathol 86:126–135
Shiraishi A, Converse RL, Liu CY, Zhou F, Kao CWC, Kao WWY (1998) Identification of the cornea-specific keratin 12 promoter by in vivo particle-mediated gene transfer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39(13):2554–2561
Simpson TI, Price DJ (2002) Pax6; a pleiotropic player in development. BioEssays 24(11):1041–1051
Simpson TI, Pratt T, Mason JO, Price DJ (2009) Normal ventral telencephalic expression of Pax6 is required for normal development of thalamocortical axons in embryonic mice. Neural Dev 4:19
Singh S, Mishra R, Arango NA, Deng JM, Behringer RR, Saunders GF (2002) Iris hypoplasia in mice that lack the alternatively spliced Pax6(5a) isoform. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(10):6812–6815. doi:10.1073/pnas.102691299
Sivak JM, West-Mays JA, Yee A, Williams T, Fini ME (2004) Transcription factors Pax6 and AP-2 alpha interact to coordinate corneal epithelial repair by controlling expression of matrix metalloproteinase gelatinase B. Mol Cell Biol 24(1):245–257
Thaung C, West K, Clark BJ, McKie L, Morgan JE, Arnold K, Nolan PM, Peters J, Hunter AJ, Brown SDM, Jackson IJ, Cross SH (2002) Novel ENU-induced eye mutations in the mouse: models for human eye disease. Hum Mol Genet 11(7):755–767
Ton CCT, Hirvonen H, Miwa H, Weil MM, Monaghan P, Jordan T, VanHeyningen V, Hastie ND, Meijersheijboer H, Drechsler M, Royerpokora B, Collins F, Swaroop A, Strong LC, Saunders GF (1991) Positional cloning and characterization of a paired box-containing and homeobox-containing gene from the aniridia region. Cell 67(6):1059–1074
van Raamsdonk CD, Tilghman SM (2000) Dosage requirement and allelic expression of PAX6 during lens placode formation. Development 127(24):5439–5448
Walisser JA, Bunger MK, Glover E, Bradfield CA (2004a) Gestational exposure of Ahr and Arnt hypomorphs to dioxin rescues vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(47):16677–16682. doi:10.1073/pnas.0404379101
Walisser JA, Bunger MK, Glover E, Harstad EB, Bradfield CA (2004b) Patent ductus venosus and dioxin resistance in mice harboring a hypomorphic Arnt allele. J Biol Chem 279(16):16326–16331. doi:10.1074/jbc.M400784200
Wang B, He L, Dong HB, Dalton TP, Nebert DW (2011) Generation of a Slc39a8 hypomorph mouse: Markedly decreased ZIP8 Zn2+/(HCO -3 )2 transporter expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 410(2):289–294. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.05.134
Wassarman KM, Lewandoski M, Campbell K, Joyner AL, Rubenstein JLR, Martinez S, Martin GR (1997) Specification of the anterior hindbrain and establishment of a normal mid/hindbrain organizer is dependent on Gbx2 gene function. Development 124(15):2923–2934
Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Kawakita T, Miyashita H, Den S, Shimazaki J, Tsubota K (2006) Cytokeratin 15 can be used to identify the limbal phenotype in normal and diseased ocular surfaces. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47(11):4780–4786
Acknowledgments
We thank staff at BRR, University of Edinburgh, for specialised technical services. We are grateful to the Wellcome Trust (Grant number 088876/Z/09/Z to JDW) and Medical Research Council, UK (Grant numbers J003662 and G0800429 to DJP) for funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11248_2016_9962_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary Fig. S1. Comparisons of corneal thickness for 12-week adult mice of five genotypes. Each point is the mean of two measurements in the central cornea of a single eye (one eye per mouse) and the horizontal bars are group means for (A) the thickness of the whole central cornea, (B) the thickness of the central corneal stroma plus endothelium, (C) the thickness of the central corneal epithelium and (D) the number of corneal epithelial layers in the central cornea. The numbers of mice per group were 5 +/+, 5fl/+, 4fl/fl, 5 +/− and 5fl/−. A–C were analysed by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; results shown on figure) and Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. D was analysed by a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test (shown on figure) and Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. Genotypes, with only different letters above the scatter plots, differ significantly (P < 0.05). Genotypes, with any shared letters above the scatter plots, do not differ significantly. Sexes are coloured differently (red, female; blue, male) but were not analysed separately. (PDF 114 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Dorà, N.J., Crookshanks, A.J.F., Leung, K.K.Y. et al. Analysis of compound heterozygotes reveals that the mouse floxed Pax6 tm1Ued allele produces abnormal eye phenotypes. Transgenic Res 25, 679–692 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-016-9962-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-016-9962-4