Abstract
This study compared the impact of biochar (in powder and extract forms) derived from the invasive tree Broussonetia papyrifera on the growth and eco-physiological responses of Vigna radiata (mung bean) under laboratory and experimental dome environments. The primary objective was to investigate the sustainable utilization potential of biochar derived from invasive plants. Powdered biochar was mixed into garden soil at amendment rates of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, while for extract treatments, the seedlings were irrigated with extracts of these concentrations. The responses of plants were found to be dependent on the concentration and type of treatment (i.e., powder or extract) used. The highest levels of growth and eco-physiological responses were observed at a concentration of 1% for biochar extract and 2% for powdered biochar. In addition, the impacts were more pronounced in the roots than in the shoots. The biochar amendment resulted in a 7‒73% increase in root length and a 12‒148% increase in plant dry biomass when compared to the control. Crop growth, water use efficiency, and leaf area were greater in powdered biochar, but net photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance were higher in plants treated with biochar extract. Adding powdered biochar to soil increases its pH, electrical conductivity (EC), moisture content, soil organic C, and amounts of available N, P, and K; however, the effects of applying biochar extracts were less pronounced. Crop growth and eco-physiological responses were found to be positively correlated, regardless of the biochar form used. Following biochar extract treatment, EC was found to be negatively correlated with Pn. The study revealed that powdered biochar had superior growth responses and soil improvement compared to biochar extract at higher concentrations. However, biochar extract also had comparable effects and can be beneficial in short-term cropping systems such as urban farming (e.g., in kitchen gardens and vegetable production) at lower concentrations (up to 2%). The findings of the study provide a baseline for future evaluations regarding the sustainable application of biochar liquor (water extract) as a source of nutrients and the powdered residual biochar as a potential material for adsorbing environmental contaminants or improving soil quality.
Highlights
• Growth of mung bean was highest when treated with 1% biochar extract and 2% powdered biochar.
• Use of powdered biochar resulted in better crop growth performance.
• Plants treated with biochar extract had a higher rate of net photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance.
• Powdered biochar improved soil physico-chemical properties more effectively than extracts.
• Biochar extract can serve as a prompt nutrient source in urban agriculture systems.
AbstractSection Graphical AbstractSimilar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Biochar is a carbonaceous material produced by pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass under oxygen-limited conditions (Jeyasubramanian et al. 2021; Li et al. 2023). It can be produced from a variety of feedstock materials, such as wood, agricultural residues, leftover food, flower residues, cow dung, municipal sewage wastes, etc. (Chen et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2018; Yadav and Singh 2023). The properties of biochar, including pH, surface area, elemental composition, and cation exchange capacity (CEC), are highly dependent on the type of feedstock and pyrolysis conditions (Liu et al. 2015; Ghodake et al. 2021; Gezahegn et al. 2024). For example, biochar produced at moderate pyrolysis temperatures (~ 400–500°C) is characterized by improved surface area and pore spaces, alkaline pH, higher nutrient content, CEC, etc. (Gupta et al. 2022; Gezahegn et al. 2024). Due to its numerous advantages, the utilization of biochar to improve soil health and crop productivity is widely advocated (Chen et al. 2022; Ibrahim et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2024). The addition of biochar improves the physico-chemical and biological properties of soils (Ghosh and Maiti 2021; Liu et al. 2023). Biochar possesses a porous structure with functional groups on its surface, which enable it to effectively absorb and retain nutrients (Xiao et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2019a). In a recent study, Kumar et al. (2023a) tested several biochars derived from different waste feedstock materials at the application rates of 0, 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5%, and found an 86% increase in water holding capacity and 31–62% improvement in soil physico-chemical properties. In addition, 71% and 209% in length and 61% and 117% in biomass of Bengal gram and coriander crops, respectively, was reported (Kumar et al. 2023a). Moreover, various other studies have also reported that biochar improves eco-physiological traits of crops such as net photosynthesis, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, etc. (Zhu et al. 2020; Gao et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021; Hasnain et al. 2023).
Among various feedstock materials, converting invasive weeds into biochar has been considered as a potential mechanism for their sustainable management (Liao et al. 2013; Weidlich et al. 2020; Li et al. 2023; Gezahegn et al. 2024). For example, the addition of biochar derived from Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. to weathered Nepalese soil improved soil fertility and Zea mays L. growth by increasing available nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) contents, soil pH, and soil moisture retention (Pandit et al. 2018). Choudhary et al. (2023) suggested that application of biochar derived from Parthenium hysterophorus L. and Lantana camara along with inorganic fertilizers improves the quality of fodder, height, and tiller numbers of Avena sativa L., along with soil microbial diversity and enzyme activities. Similarly, Ghosh and Maiti (2021) reported improved soil enzymatic activities and productivity of mine spoil soil receiving invasive plant-derived biochar up to 3% dose. In another pot study, the effects of biochar derived from Bidens pilosa L., Wedelia trilobata (L.) Hitchc., and Mikania micrantha Kunth at 1% and 3% doses were proven to be better than lime for improving the soil pH, availability of N, P and K contents, and biological properties under acid-rainfed conditions. In comparison to the high alkalinity induced by liming, biochar amendment was shown to maintain a near neutral pH in acidic soil (Li et al. 2023). However, the impacts of biochar derived from invasive weeds must be thoroughly evaluated at different scales before wider application in the field.
In addition to using biochar as powder (solid), the role of biochar water extract (a water-soluble pool of nutrients) in improving the growth of crops is also currently receiving increased attention (Liu et al. 2021; Gao et al. 2023). Biochar extract has been shown to have a dominating pool of nutrients that improves the growth of crop plants, compared to the washed solid biochar (Liu et al. 2021). In a hydroponic study, Gao et al. (2023) found that biochar-extracted liquor improved the physiological traits of rice seedlings and also upregulated the N metabolism-related genes. Rafique et al. (2022) conducted a Petri dish experiment and found that jujube wood waste biochar improved seed germination and seedling growth of Triticum aestivum L. Based on a pot study, Aon et al. (2023) reported that addition of wheat straw biochar in soil enhanced the biomass and grain yield of Z. mays, and improved soil properties via increased nutrient retention. Recently, Liao et al. (2023) conducted a global meta-analysis that highlighted the advantages of incorporating biochar into green infrastructure. Urban agriculture systems can potentially utilize biochar in either its solid (powdered) form for soil amendment or as a water-extracted liquor for crop irrigation (Song et al. 2020). This can be a cost-effective strategy, especially for soil-less agricultural systems (Gao et al. 2023); however, further investigations are required at different scales.
Broussonetia papyrifera (L.) ĹHér. ex Vent. (Paper mulberry; Moraceae), a subtropical deciduous tree, has been regarded as an invasive plant in India (Maan et al. 2021). The excess litter biomass generated by this tree could alter soil characteristics and also exhibit allelopathic interference with the understorey vegetation (Maan et al. 2021). To address this, innovative applications (such as biochar) of the leaf litter generated by B. papyrifera can be extremely beneficial. However, no studies are available on the effect of B. papyrifera leaf litter-derived biochar (hereafter Bp-biochar) on the crops. Legumes, the second most cultivated crops globally following cereals (Šerá et al. 2021), have a high nutritive value owing to the presence of abundant proteins, carbohydrates, and dietary fibres, and low levels of cholesterol and fats (Maphosa and Jideani 2017). Despite being resilient, growing aridity and deteriorating soil health in response to climate change scenarios pose a significant challenge to their sustainable cultivation (Kumar et al. 2023b). Therefore, investigating processes (such as biochar amendment) to improve the growth of legumes can be a viable strategy for promoting agricultural sustainability. However, there is no study comparing the benefits of using biochar (powder and/or extract) for legume crop growth and soil properties. In this study, we chose mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek), because it is the most consumed pulse crop in South Asian countries, particularly India, and is known to provide nutritional security (Mehandi et al. 2019; Kumar et al. 2023b). With the above background, the study hypothesized that the application of Bp-biochar would enhance the growth attributes of mung bean by regulating its eco-physiological responses and improving soil properties. Therefore, the aims of the study were twofold: (i) to investigate the differential impacts of Bp-biochar (in powder form and as an extract) on the initial growth and eco-physiological responses of mung bean, and (ii) to assess the changes in soil physico-chemical properties following the application of Bp-biochar treatments. To the best of our knowledge, the study is the first of its kind to compare the effects of invasive tree-derived biochar powder and extract on the eco-physiological responses of a major legume plant. Such studies examining the benefits of biochar derived from invasive plants can be helpful in their sustainable management.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Biochar preparation and characterization
The fallen leaves of B. papyrifera were collected at P.N. Mehra Botanical Garden, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India, and dried in shade. The biomass was dried in an oven and ground into powder to reduce volume and achieve homogenization, as the properties of biochar are dependent on the size of feedstock material (He et al. 2018). The pulverized biomass was subsequently pyrolyzed in a muffle furnace at 400°C for 30 min (ramp rate ~ 20°C min‒1) under oxygen-limited conditions. The pH and electrical conductivity (EC) of the feedstock and biochar were determined using digital pH (EcoScan pH 700; Eutech, Singapore) and EC (Con 700; Eutech) meters. The surface morphology, structure, and nature of biomass and biochar were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The functional groups and crystalline phases of biochar were identified using a Fourier-transformed infrared (FT-IR) spectrophotometer and an X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD), respectively. The carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and ash contents of the feedstock material and Bp-biochar were determined via elemental analysis.
2.2 Plant materials
Seeds of mung bean (var. ML-5) were bought from a local store in Chandigarh, India. Prior to sowing, the seeds were surface sterilized with sodium hypochlorite (0.1%) and washed five times with distilled water.
2.3 Laboratory experiment
A Petri plate experiment was performed to assess the preliminary effects of Bp-biochar (powder vs. extract) on mung bean growth. A stock of 4% biochar extract was prepared by shaking 20 g of powdered biochar in a conical flask filled with 500 mL of distilled water at room temperature for an hour. The stock solution was diluted by adding distilled water to achieve concentrations of 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%. Petri plates (ø = 15 cm) were disinfected with 100% ethanol and lined with a thin cotton layer on the bottom. A sheet of Whatman filter paper #1 was placed on top of the cotton layer. For biochar powder treatment, filter paper was moistened with 10 mL of distilled water and different amounts of biochar (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 g) were uniformly distributed on the surface of filter paper. The used amounts (0 to 4 g per Petri plate) of biochar powder corresponds to biochar application rates of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 t ha‒1 (for a soil depth of 10 cm) in the field (Solaiman et al. 2012). For biochar extract treatment, filter paper was moistened with 10 ml of varying concentrations (0, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%) of biochar water extract. Subsequently, 25 mung bean seeds were placed on the surface of filter paper and allowed to germinate for 10 days. Overall, there were nine treatment combinations: four for powder and water extract, and one for control. A total of 27 Petri plates were used, with three plates per treatment. The experiment was conducted at an ambient temperature of 25 ± 2°C, a relative humidity of 80 ± 2%, and a photoperiod of 16/8 h, with a photosynthetic photon flux density of approximately 450 µmol photons m−2 s−1. After 10 days, root length, shoot length, and seedling biomass were recorded for each treatment combination.
2.4 Pot experiment
2.4.1 Experimental setup
The growth attributes of mung bean were assessed in an experimental dome using a pot assay to determine the impact of various treatments of powdered and extracted Bp-biochar. In all, there were nine treatments, four each of biochar extracts and biochar powder added to the soil, and a parallel control group with no biochar powder or extract added to the soil. The initial characteristics of the garden soil used for the pot assay were as follows: pH = 7.25 ± 0.02; EC = 203.67 ± 1.76 µS cm−1; soil organic carbon (SOC) = 1.19 ± 0.05%; available nitrogen (N) = 112.90 ± 1.25 kg ha−1; available phosphorus (P) = 40.70 ± 0.47 kg ha−1; and available potassium (K) = 151.42 ± 0.30 kg ha−1.
For the powder treatment, the biochar (at 0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%, w/w of soil) was thoroughly mixed with garden soil and then filled in polypropylene pots (ø = 10 cm). As described earlier these treatments corresponded to biochar application rates of approximately 5-, 10-, 20-, and 40-ton ha−1, respectively, at a depth of 10 cm in field settings (Solaiman et al. 2012). Throughout the experiment, distilled water was used to irrigate pots treated with biochar powder. For Bp-biochar extract treatments, the pots were irrigated with 40 mL of the respective extract concentrations (0.5%, 1%, 2%, and 4%) on the first day. Then, 10 mL of extract was added on alternate day until a total of 100 mL of extract was added. Afterwards, 10 mL of distilled water was added to the pots on the remaining days. Three pots were maintained for each treatment. A total of 27 pots were used in the pot assay, with 9 treatments and 3 replicates per treatment. On the first day, five mung bean seeds were sown in each pot. The experiment lasted for 21 days under natural conditions at 25 ± 2°C, 70 ± 5% relative humidity, and a 16/8 h day/night photoperiod.
2.4.2 Growth parameters
The effect of Bp-biochar was determined by measuring the growth of 21-day-old mung bean plants. The shoot and root length were measured using a centimeter scale, and their fresh weight was determined using a digital weighing balance (ME104; Mettler Toledo). To determine the dry weight, plant samples were dried in an oven at 60°C for 72 h and then weighed.
2.4.3 Leaf parameters
The area of mung bean leaves was measured using a Leaf area meter (CI-202, CID BioScience, USA). Dimethyl sulfoxide was used to extract chlorophyll and carotenoids from leaves at 60ºC for an hour. The absorbance was measured at 470, 645, and 663 nm, and the amount of total chlorophyll (TC) and carotenoids in leaf samples was calculated using the well-established formulae (Batish et al. 2006). The leaves were dried in an oven for 72 h at 60°C, and the dry weight of the leaves was determined using a digital weighing balance. The foliar water mass was calculated by subtracting the dry weight of the leaves from the fresh weight (Huang et al. 2019).
2.4.4 Eco-physiological parameters
The eco-physiological characteristics such as net photosynthesis rate (Pn, µmol m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2 s−1), leaf stomatal conductance (C, mmol m−2 s−1), and vapor pressure deficit (VPD, kPa) of mung bean were measured to observe the impacts of Bp-biochar using a portable photosynthesis system (CI-340; CID Bio-Science, USA). The data were collected under the following conditions: atmospheric pressure of 96.3 kPa, mass flow rate of 0.9 mol m−2 s−1, and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of approximately 700 µmol m−2 s−1. The air and leaf temperatures during the analysis were around 35 and 36ºC, respectively. The relative humidity at the inlet and outflow was 64 and 75%, respectively. The water use efficiency (WUE) of plants was determined by dividing the value of Pn by E and expressed in µmol mmol−1.
2.4.5 Soil analysis
The post-harvest soil was analyzed for physico-chemical characteristics such as pH and EC using digital pH and EC meters (described earlier), soil moisture content using the gravimetric (weight loss) method, and available N, P, K, and SOC contents using standard methods elaborated by Tandon (1993).
2.5 Statistical analysis
The data were examined for normality prior to inferential statistical analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the impact of different doses of Bp-biochar powder and extract (separately) on soil properties and plant responses. The significant differences among the treatments (control with biochar powder and biochar extract, separately) were determined by post hoc Tukey’s test at the 95% level of significance (p ≤ 0.05) using the SPSS package (version 16). Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed and represented using the “ggcorrplot” package, while principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted using the “stats” and “factoextra” packages in the R program (version 4.2.2; R Core Team 2022). The graphs were prepared using Sigma Plot (version 11.0) and OriginLab 2022.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Biochar characterization
The biochar produced at 400°C exhibited a moderate alkaline nature, with a pH value of 10.17, and an EC of 2.22 mS cm−1 (Table 1). The pyrolysis of biomass led to an increase in pH, whereas a reduction in EC was found in relation to the initial feedstock material. In contrast to biomass, biochar exhibited an increase in C, N and ash content levels, while a decline in H and O contents was observed (Table 1). These results are consistent with previous research that have described the characteristics of biochar produced through the pyrolysis of biomass (Mohan et al. 2018; Gezahegn et al. 2024). The observed pH increase in the biochar may be attributed to its higher ash content enriched with various alkaline earth metals like K, Mg, and Ca, as revealed by EDS analysis (Fig. 1). Earlier studies reported that the pyrolysis of biomass is associated with the formation of basic oxides and carbonates of Ca and Mg, which may lead to an increase in pH, whereas the decrease in EC may be attributed to the stabilization of elements on the surface of biochar (Mohan et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2019a; Gezahegn et al. 2024). Crop residues or leaf litter predominantly consist of cellulosic and hemicellulosic constituents, which undergo a more rapid decomposition process in comparison to the woody components that are rich in lignin (Singh et al. 2015). Pyrolysis of biomass at 400°C or higher can cause the hemicellulose and cellulose to degrade more quickly and releases volatile gases, leading to the rough (amorphous) surface of biochar, as observed in this study (Fig. 1). The amorphous structure of biochar increases its surface area and pore spaces, which may aid in nutrient retention and ion stabilization (Singh et al. 2018). The FT-IR spectrum (Fig. 2) revealed absorption bands primarily at 3526 nm, 2924 nm, 2828 nm, ~ 2300 nm, 1607 nm, 1418 nm, 1048 nm and 783 nm, which indicated the presence of hydroxides, phenolic-OH and amine groups; C-H bonds of aromatic compounds; C-H and C = O groups of aliphatic compounds; ketones, carboxylic acid and esters groups; and C–Cl or Si–O groups, respectively (Singh et al. 2018; Gezahegn et al. 2024). These observations correspond to the breakdown of cellulosic components and the synthesis of aliphatic and aromatic carbonaceous compounds during the pyrolysis process (Singh et al. 2015). The XRD analysis revealed the existence of sharp peaks (2θ) at 26° and 45° which correspond to the specific crystallographic planes of silica and calcite phases, respectively (Mohan et al. 2018; Fig. 3). The EDS results corroborate with the observations reported in XRD spectrum. Overall, the results of FT-IR, XRD, and EDS analyses support that the Bp-biochar used in the present study is alkaline in nature due to the presence of various compounds of alkaline earth elements.
3.2 Growth response of mung bean to Bp-biochar powder and extract: a laboratory assay
Root and shoot length increased significantly (P ≤ 0.001) with increasing biochar concentrations up to 1% (Table 2 and Table S1). The impacts of biochar powder and extract amendment were more pronounced in the roots than in the shoots. Seedling dry biomass increased by 109% and 118% (p < 0.001) at 1% and 2% concentrations of extract and powdered biochar, respectively. Similar observations were made by Solaiman et al. (2012) and Nazir and Batool (2020), who observed that as biochar concentrations increased, the root and shoot fresh and dry biomass increased. Nevertheless, the growth responses began to decline as biochar concentration increased from 1% or 2%, but they were still greater than the control after 10 days (Table 2). The uniform moist conditions and controlled release of nutrients in the powdered biochar treatments may have aided the growth of seedlings up to 2% concentration (Solaiman et al. 2012). Furthermore, because biochar had a pH of 10.17 (Table 1), it is likely that the high alkalinity of the medium is exerting a significant influence on treatments with biochar concentrations exceeding 2%. Therefore, the application of Bp-biochar at a concentration of up to 2% may help to improve the structural development of crop plants by increasing their resistance to harsh conditions. Based on the laboratory assay results, the study was extended to experimental dome conditions to investigate the impact of Bp-biochar in natural systems.
3.3 Growth performance of mung bean in Bp-biochar amended soil: pot assay
With different amounts of biochar in both forms, there was a significant (p ≤ 0.01) variation in the growth characteristics of mung bean (Table S2; Fig. S1). With the exception of shoot length, mung bean growth responses were significantly higher when powdered biochar was used compared to the extract (Fig. 4). The application of extract and powdered biochar at concentrations ranging from 1% to 2% resulted in greater root growth (64–73%) compared to shoot growth (12–17%) (Fig. 4a, b). However, growth was observed to decrease significantly at a concentration of 4%. Similar results were observed in another pot study, where root and shoot length of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. and Cicer arietinum L. increased significantly when grown in soil amended with biochar powder (Ahmad et al. 2022). The increase in growth resulting from biochar amendment may be attributed to an enhanced nutrient intake from biochar (Gao et al. 2023; Kumar et al. 2023a). This is supported by the higher concentrations of Mg, Ca, K, and N as indicated by the EDS analysis (Fig. 1; Table 1). Similar to length, 1‒2% biochar application resulted in a 40‒148% increase in the fresh and dry weight of roots compared to 21‒52% increase in shoots (Fig. 4c‒f). Similar findings were reported by Videgain-Marco et al. (2020) in a greenhouse study based on exploring the effects of biochar prepared from Vitis vinifera L. on the soil–plant system. Biochar produced from V. vinifera at 400°C improved the dry biomass of Sorghum bicolor L. Moench roots by 52% over control and increased the contents of K, Ca, and Mg in the soil (Videgain-Marco et al. 2020). In another study conducted to explore the impact of biochar amendment on the growth properties of two rice cultivars, Kamara et al. (2015) observed a considerable increase in shoot dry weight of both rice cultivars after biochar amendment compared to the control. However, an increasing dose of biochar has been reported to decrease crop growth by Ibrahim et al. (2023). Therefore, Bp-biochar applied in this study showed an overall positive response to the growth of mung bean up to 2% concentration.
3.4 Eco-physiological responses of mung bean are improved in Bp-biochar amended soils
The growth and adaptability of legumes can be predicted by monitoring their eco-physiological characteristics (Baligar et al. 2020). Many studies have demonstrated that biochar positively affects eco-physiological parameters in plants and contributes to the enhancement of crop growth (Nigam et al. 2019; Gao et al. 2021; Wang et al. 2021; Hasnain et al. 2023). In this study, we observed a significant (p ≤ 0.01) increase in several eco-physiological parameters (except stomatal conductance) with biochar up to a concentration of 2%, followed by a decline (Figs. 5 and 6; Table S3). Total chlorophyll and carotenoids (Fig. 5a‒b), as well as leaf area (Fig. 6f) increased upon application of 1% and 2% of powdered biochar and extract application, respectively. However, leaf dry weight and foliar water content (Fig. 5c‒d) were increased up to 2% concentrations of biochar application in both forms. According to Huang et al. (2019), the area of leaf cells expands in response to a greater input of biomass, which in turn increases the active surface area available for photosynthesis. It was confirmed by an increase in leaf dry weight and foliar water mass, which are crucial factors influencing photosynthetic carbon assimilation (Huang et al. 2019). Nevertheless, a significant decline (even lower than the control) was observed at 4% concentration, suggesting the need for careful and thoughtful use of Bp-biochar for promoting crop growth.
In a meta-analysis, Gao et al. (2021) found that the application of biochar at the suggested rates of ~ 2‒4% results in an average increase of 23% in the photosynthetic rate. In the present study, we observed an increase in the net photosynthetic rate of mung bean by over 38% when biochar powder and extract concentrations were applied at a rate of ≤ 2% (Fig. 6a). The transpiration rate was observed to be approximately two times higher in extract-applied treatments compared to powdered biochar application (Fig. 6b). The stomatal conductance exhibited remarkably high increase of 352% and 498% at 1% and 2% extract concentrations, respectively (Fig. 6c). In contrast, an initial increase in stomatal conductance was observed upon application of 0.5% powdered biochar but it decreased sharply as the biochar concentration increased (Fig. 6c). Likewise, the extract-applied treatment exhibited a greater vapour pressure deficit than the powdered biochar (Fig. 6d). High vapor pressure deficit implies that the air surrounding the leaf is dry, increasing the atmospheric water demand, and consequently, the transpiration rate of the leaf increases (Massmann et al. 2019). This was corroborated by our results, which indicated that the extract-applied treatments exhibited a greater transpiration rate in the presence of a high vapour pressure deficit. However, contrasting results were observed with the application of biochar powder. Plants may have adopted this strategy in an attempt to decrease the evapotranspiration resulting from a high vapour pressure deficit by closing their stomata and lowering their conductance (Massmann et al. 2019; Singh et al. 2020). Furthermore, the relatively greater foliar water mass observed in seedlings growing in biochar powder may contribute to the enhancement of WUE and the reduction of water demand, i.e., transpiration loss, under such treatments. In order to observe the efficacy of photosynthesis in terms of water loss, instantaneous WUE was also calculated. Both forms of biochar application showed a concentration-dependent increase in WUE (p ≤ 0.01); however, the powdered biochar treatment was more effective (Fig. 6e).
In general, the eco-physiological responses of mung bean seedlings treated with extract were comparable to those observed with powdered biochar (Figs. 5 and 6). With the exception of photosynthetic rate (Pn), which declined at > 1% extract concentration, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and vapor pressure deficit were significantly higher under extract applied treatments up to 2% (Fig. 6). This might be because roots absorb nutrients in the form of biochar extract more quickly than nutrients released by powdered biochar in the soil matrix. Consequently, using extracts might increase stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, facilitating the rapid transportation of nutrients to the leaves (Singh et al. 2020). This suggests that biochar extract has high potential for utilization in soil-less hydroponic agriculture or irrigating urban crops.
3.5 Biochar powder and water extract improve the soil properties
The rhizospheric soil serves as the principal medium for plant nutrition and mineral absorption, and crop growth is directly impacted by the availability of nutrients to the plants (He et al. 2022). Biochar significantly influences the physico-chemical properties and nutrient composition of soil through the improvement of microclimatic conditions and mineralisation activities (Singh et al. 2019a; Amoah-Antwi et al. 2020). The majority of research on biochar has utilized powdered biochar for studying its effects on plant growth. Further, in comparison with the washed biochar residue, the water-soluble pool of biochar, i.e., its extract, has been shown to be a dominant source that improves the growth of crop plants (Liu et al. 2021). In this 21-day short-term study, we found that applying biochar in both powder and extract form significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased the levels of physico-chemical properties like pH, EC, moisture content, and available nutrient concentrations (Table 3 and Table S4). An increase in soil pH and EC was observed with increasing amounts of both forms of biochar. Likewise, soil moisture content increased by up to 200% over the control with the powdered biochar. At 4% powdered biochar concentration, there was a significant (p ≤ 0.01) increase in soil available N (46.7%), P (281.5%), K (157.3%), and SOC (55.8%) contents compared to the control (Table 3). However, the increase in nutrient concentrations was marginal in extract treatments. These observations agree with the previous studies reporting the impacts of biochar on soil properties (Singh et al. 2019a, b; He et al. 2022). In general, the addition of biochar powder significantly improved the physico-chemical properties of the soil in comparison to the application of biochar extract (Table 3). The surface characteristics of biochar, including its larger surface area, pore spaces, and presence of exchangeable cations, have a significant impact on enhancing the physicochemical attributes of soil when powdered biochar is applied (Mohan et al. 2018; Singh et al. 2019a). The powdered biochar is rich in nutrients and effectively retains these elements within its matrix for gradual release. Biochar has the ability to attract and retain nutrients from the soil matrix, making them available to crops for an extended period of time (He et al. 2022). This could result in an initial shortage of nutrient concentration for the plants when high doses of biochar are applied alone (Singh et al. 2020). On the other hand, in the case of soil irrigation with biochar extract, plants can only utilize the extracted amount of nutrients at a time, compared to the slow-release of nutrients from powdered biochar for a longer duration. Therefore, in this study, after a 21-day treatment period, the soil amended with powdered biochar exhibited significantly greater amounts of available nutrients compared to the soil treated with extract.
3.6 Interrelationships between mung bean growth parameters and soil properties: mechanism of action under biochar powder and extract application
Due to its stable biochemical structure, resistance to breakdown, and ability to increase the organic carbon pool in soil, biochar has the potential to improve soil fertility and nutrient composition, and thus, enhance crop yields (Rehman et al. 2021). It was observed that plants grown in biochar powder performed better at concentrations up to 2% than plants that were irrigated with biochar extract, where the effect peaked at 1%. This may be explained by the fact that a significant portion of nutrients are extracted during the preparation of extract; therefore, irrigating with such solutions provides plants with a first-hand, direct source of nutrients that supports the early growth of seedlings (Liu et al. 2021). In contrast, biochar powder allows a gradual release of nutrients in accordance with the needs of the plant or mineralisation rate, resulting in optimal plant growth at a concentration of 2%. This assumption is supported by a strong positive correlation between photosynthetic rate and growth parameters (Fig. 7a, b). Nevertheless, a strong negative correlation was found between the photosynthetic rate and EC under extract-applied treatment (Fig. 7b). This may be the result of increased alkaline stress conditions on the plants at greater concentrations of biochar extract, which lowers the photosynthetic rate and, consequently, the growth responses. Further, a negative relationship between soil nutrients and growth parameters revealed that crops responded positively upto some concentration, and after that, either nutrient saturation or adsorption of nutrients on the biochar surface may hinder crop growth (Singh et al. 2019a). Previously, Gale and Thomas (2019) demonstrated that the dose-dependent effects of biochar on the growth and eco-physiological characteristics of two plants, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. and Trifolium repens L., are primarily caused by changes in nutrient availability. In this context, we propose that altering the aforementioned soil characteristics can enhance plant growth, photosynthesis, and other eco-physiological parameters.
Principal component analysis (PCA) showed the arrangement of different plant growth parameters and soil variables according to their concentration (Fig. 8). The majority of crop growth and eco-physiological parameters were found to be aligned towards PC axis-1, while soil properties were aligned with PC axis-2. As regards the powdered biochar, the majority of the parameters investigated were aligned towards a concentration of 2% (Fig. 8a), whereas for extract treatment, the majority of the parameters were aligned with concentrations ranging from 1% to 2% (Fig. 8b). In both cases, PC axes 1 and 2 together accounted for over 75% of the variability in the observed parameters (Fig. 8a, b). Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that, despite the reduced availability of soil nutrients, a significant increase in plant growth was observed in response to biochar extract treatment. This suggests that the extract ensures immediate nutrient supply to the crop plants, making biochar extract suitable for short-term urban cropping systems. In general, extract offers nutritional roles that may help plants grow; whereas, powdered biochar gives adaptation benefits to plants, in addition to retaining its surface characteristics. For example, a strong correlation was found between the rate of photosynthesis and the moisture content of the soil when powdered biochar was applied. The surface characteristics of biochar, such as its large surface area, porosity, and cation exchange capacity, are advantageous for adsorption (Gope et al. 2022), wastewater treatment (Qambrani et al. 2017), and crop growth in abiotically stressed soils (Mansoor et al. 2021). Overall, the findings of this study will contribute to the control of the invasive tree and expand our understanding about the benefits of biochar extract on crop health. The assessment of eco-physiological characteristics will serve as a definitive indicator of the impacts of biochar in future studies, and a decision can be made regarding whether to use powdered or extracted biochar based on the specific needs of the study. Nevertheless, it is necessary to conduct long-term studies including several plant species under both treatment regimes to establish a definitive conclusion.
4 Conclusions
Based on the findings of the study, we can conclude that applying biochar as an extract enhances crop growth and eco-physiological responses comparable to those observed with powdered biochar. Nevertheless, the enhancement of soil properties is relatively more pronounced when biochar is applied in powdered form. While powdered biochar is advantageous for long-term growth enhancement and soil improvement, the application of biochar extract may be beneficial for short-term growth improvement due to immediate supply of available nutrients. The results indicate that application of biochar extract derived from invasive plants, at concentrations as low as 1% to 2%, may be effectively used for crop cultivation, while the residual biochar powder can be used for adsorption purposes. However, further comprehensive research is required, taking into account various crop types, application rates and soil conditions under different agroclimatic regimes. Further, the utility of B. papyrifera for biochar preparation may also serve as an economically-viable method for its management from the urban and peri-urban areas where it is spreading rapidly.
Availability of data and materials
Relevant data has been presented in the manuscript. The raw data can be made available on request to the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- C:
-
Leaf stomatal conductance
- CAR:
-
Carotenoid content
- E:
-
Transpiration rate
- EC:
-
Electrical conductivity
- EDS:
-
Energy dispersive spectroscopy
- FWM:
-
Foliar water mass
- K:
-
Available potassium
- LA:
-
Leaf area
- LDW:
-
Leaf dry weight
- N:
-
Available nitrogen
- P:
-
Available phosphorus
- PCA:
-
Principal component analysis
- Pn:
-
Net photosynthesis rate
- RDW:
-
Root dry weight
- RFW:
-
Root fresh weight
- RL:
-
Root length
- SDW:
-
Shoot dry weight
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscopy
- SFW:
-
Shoot fresh weight
- SL:
-
Shoot length
- SOC:
-
Soil organic carbon
- TC:
-
Total chlorophyll content
- VPD:
-
Vapour pressure deficit
- WUE:
-
Water use efficiency
References
Ahmad A, Chowdhary P, Khan N, Chaurasia D, Varjani S, Pandey A, Chaturvedi P (2022) Effect of sewage sludge biochar on the soil nutrient, microbial abundance, and plant biomass: A sustainable approach towards mitigation of solid waste. Chemosphere 287:132112
Amoah-Antwi C, Kwiatkowska-Malina J, Thornton SF, Fenton O, Malina G, Szara E (2020) Restoration of soil quality using biochar and brown coal waste: a review. Sci Total Environ 722:137852
Aon M, Aslam Z, Hussain S, Bashir MA, Shaaban M, Masood S, Iqbal S, Khalid M, Rehim A, Mosa WF, Sas-Paszt L (2023) Wheat straw biochar produced at a low temperature enhanced maize growth and yield by influencing soil properties of typic calciargid. Sustainability 15:9488
Baligar VC, Elson MK, He Z, Li Y, Paiva AD, Almeida AA, Ahnert D (2020) Light intensity effects on the growth, physiological and nutritional parameters of tropical perennial legume cover crops. Agronomy 10:1515
Batish DR, Singh HP, Setia N, Kaur S, Kohli RK (2006) Chemical composition and phytotoxicity of volatile essential oil from intact and fallen leaves of Eucalyptus citriodora. ZNC 61:465–471
Chen Q, Qin J, Sun P, Cheng Z, Shen G (2018) Cow dung-derived engineered biochar for reclaiming phosphate from aqueous solution and its validation as slow-release fertilizer in soil-crop system. J Clean Prod 172:2009–2018
Chen Q, Lan P, Wu M, Lu M, Pan B, Xing B (2022) Biochar mitigates allelopathy through regulating allelochemical generation from plants and accumulation in soil. Carbon Res 1:6
Choudhary P, Prasad M, Choudhary M, Kumar A, Kumar S, Srinivasan R, Mahawer SK (2023) Exploring invasive weed biochar as soil amendment: A study on fodder oats productivity and soil biological properties. Environ Res 216:114527
Gale NV, Thomas SC (2019) Dose-dependence of growth and ecophysiological responses of plants to biochar. Sci Total Environ 658:1344–1354
Gao Y, Shao G, Yang Z, Zhang K, Lu J, Wang Z, Wu S, Xu D (2021) Influences of soil and biochar properties and amount of biochar and fertilizer on the performance of biochar in improving plant photosynthetic rate: a meta-analysis. Eur J Agron 130:126345
Gao J, Ge S, Wang H, Fang Y, Sun L, He T, Cheng X, Wang D, Zhou X, Cai H, Li C (2023) Biochar-extracted liquor stimulates nitrogen related gene expression on improving nitrogen utilization in rice seedling. Front Plant Sci 14:1131937
Gezahegn A, Selassie YG, Agegnehu G, Addisu S, Mihretie FA, Kohira Y, Sato S (2024) Pyrolysis temperature changes the physicochemical characteristics of water hyacinth-based biochar as a potential soil amendment. Biomass Conv Bioref 2024:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-024-05338-2
Ghodake GS, Shinde SK, Kadam AA, Saratale RG, Saratale GD, Kumar M, Palem RR, Al-Shwaiman HA, Elgorban AM, Syed A, Kim DY (2021) Review on biomass feedstocks, pyrolysis mechanism and physicochemical properties of biochar: State-of-the-art framework to speed up vision of circular bioeconomy. J Clean Prod 297:126645
Ghosh D, Maiti SK (2021) Effect of invasive weed biochar amendment on soil enzymatic activity and respiration of coal mine spoil: a laboratory experiment study. Biochar 3:519–533
Gope M, Paramanik P, Som I, Mondal S, Ghosh AR, Saha R (2022) A review on low-cost adsorbent (biochar) for the elimination of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from contaminated water. Arab J Geosci 15:1609
Gupta I, Singh R, Batish DR, Singh HP, Raghubanshi AS, Kohli RK (2022) Engineered Biochar as Soil Fertilizer. In: Ramola S, Mohan D, Masek O, Méndez A, Tsubota T (eds) Engineered Biochar. Springer, Singapore, pp 197–221
Hasnain M, Munir N, Abideen Z, Zulfiqar F, Koyro HW, El-Naggar A, Caçador I, Duarte B, Rinklebe J, Yong JW (2023) Biochar-plant interaction and detoxification strategies under abiotic stresses for achieving agricultural resilience: A critical review. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 249:114408
He P, Liu Y, Shao L, Zhang H, Lü F (2018) Particle size dependence of the physicochemical properties of biochar. Chemosphere 212:385–392
He C, Zhang L, Li X (2022) Plant performance and soil fungal community impacts of enhancing Dioscorea opposita with spraying foliar fertilizer with different nutrient element combinations. Agronomy 12:2017
Huang W, Ratkowsky DA, Hui C, Wang P, Su J, Shi P (2019) Leaf fresh weight versus dry weight: which is better for describing the scaling relationship between leaf biomass and leaf area for broad-leaved plants? Forests 10:256
Ibrahim MM, Chang Z, Li Z, Joseph J, Yusuf AA, Luo X, Hou E (2023) Biochar rate-dependent regulation of extended nitrogen supply by modifying stable aggregates-N and microbial responses. Carbon Res 2:22
Jeyasubramanian K, Thangagiri B, Sakthivel A, Raja JD, Seenivasan S, Vallinayagam P, Madhavan D, Devi SM, Rathika B (2021) A complete review on biochar: Production, property, multifaceted applications, interaction mechanism and computational approach. Fuel 292:120243
Kamara A, Kamara HS, Kamara MS (2015) Effect of rice straw biochar on soil quality and the early growth and biomass yield of two rice varieties. Agric Sci 6:798
Kumar A, Kumari M, Azim U, Vithanage M, Bhattacharya T (2023a) Garbage to Gains: The role of biochar in sustainable soil quality improvement, arsenic remediation, and crop yield enhancement. Chemosphere 344:140417
Kumar S, Gopinath KA, Sheoran S, Meena RS, Srinivasarao C, Bedwal S, Jangir CK, Mrunalini K, Jat R, Praharaj CS (2023b) Pulse-based cropping systems for soil health restoration, resources conservation, and nutritional and environmental security in rainfed agroecosystems. Front Microbiol 13:1041124
Li Y, Abdo AI, Shi Z, Merwad AR, Zhang J (2023) Biochar derived from invasive plants improved the pH, macronutrient availability and biological properties better than liming for acid rain-affected soil. Biochar 5:59
Liao R, Gao B, Fang J (2013) Invasive plants as feedstock for biochar and bioenergy production. Bioresour Technol 140:439–442
Liao W, Halim MA, Kayes I, Drake JA, Thomas SC (2023) Biochar benefits of green infrastructure: Global meta-analysis and synthesis. Environ Sci Technol 57(41):15475–15486
Liu N, Charrua AB, Weng CH, Yuan X, Ding F (2015) Characterization of biochars derived from agriculture wastes and their adsorptive removal of atrazine from aqueous solution: A comparative study. Bioresour Technol 198:55–62
Liu C, Sun B, Zhang X, Liu X, Drosos M, Li L, Pan G (2021) The water-soluble pool in biochar dominates maize plant growth promotion under biochar amendment. J Plant Growth Regul 40:1466–1476
Liu Q, Meki K, Zheng H, Yuan Y, Shao M, Luo X, Li X, Jiang Z, Li F, Xing B (2023) Biochar application in remediating salt-affected soil to achieve carbon neutrality and abate climate change. Biochar 5:45
Maan I, Kaur A, Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2021) Exotic avenue plantations turning foe: Invasive potential, distribution and impact of Broussonetia papyrifera in Chandigarh, India. Urban For Urban Green 59:127010
Mansoor S, Kour N, Manhas S, Zahid S, Wani OA, Sharma V, Wijaya L, Alyemeni MN, Alsahli AA, El-Serehy HA, Paray BA (2021) Biochar as a tool for effective management of drought and heavy metal toxicity. Chemosphere 271:129458
Maphosa Y, Jideani VA (2017) The role of legumes in human nutrition. In: Functional food - improve health through adequate food. Hueda MC, eds. InTechOpen, pp. 1:13. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.69127
Massmann A, Gentine P, Lin C (2019) When does vapor pressure deficit drive or reduce evapotranspiration? J Adv Model Earth Syst 11:3305–3320
Mehandi S, Quatadah S, Mishra SP, Singh I, Praveen N, Dwivedi N (2019) Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. wilczek): retrospect and prospects. In: El-Esawi (ed) Legume crops-characterization and breeding for improved food security. IntechOpen, London, pp 49–66
Mohan D, Abhishek K, Sarswat A, Patel M, Singh P, Pittman CU (2018) Biochar production and applications in soil fertility and carbon sequestration–a sustainable solution to crop-residue burning in India. RSC Adv 8:508–520
Nazir R, Batool M (2020) Synthesis of biochar-based composites to evaluate morphology of wheat seedling. LGU J Life Sci 4:270–284
Nigam N, Khare P, Yadav V, Mishra D, Jain S, Karak T, Panja S, Tandon S (2019) Biochar-mediated sequestration of Pb and Cd leads to enhanced productivity in Mentha arvensis. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 172:411–422
Pandit NR, Mulder J, Hale SE, Martinsen V, Schmidt HP, Cornelissen G (2018) Biochar improves maize growth by alleviation of nutrient stress in a moderately acidic low-input Nepalese soil. Sci Total Environ 625:1380–1389
Qambrani NA, Rahman MM, Won S, Shim S, Ra C (2017) Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 79:255–273
R Core Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Version 4.2.2, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna). 2022.
Rafique MI, Ahmad M, Al-Wabel MI, Ahmad J, Al-Farraj AS (2022) Mitigating the toxic effects of chromium on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed germination and seedling growth by using biochar and polymer-modified biochar in contaminated soil. Sustainability 14:16093
Rehman M, Saleem MH, Fahad S, Bashir S, Peng D, Deng G, Alamri S, Siddiqui MH, Khan SM, Shah RA, Liu L (2021) Effects of rice straw biochar and nitrogen fertilizer on ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) morpho-physiological traits, copper uptake and post-harvest soil characteristics, grown in an aged-copper contaminated soil. J Plant Nutr 45:11–24
Šerá B, Scholtz V, Jirešová J, Khun J, Julák J, Šerý M (2021) Effects of non–thermal plasma treatment on seed germination and early growth of leguminous plants—A review. Plants 10:1616
Singh R, Babu JN, Kumar R, Srivastava P, Singh P, Raghubanshi AS (2015) Multifaceted application of crop residue biochar as a tool for sustainable agriculture: an ecological perspective. Ecol Eng 77:324–347
Singh P, Singh R, Borthakur A, Madhav S, Singh VK, Tiwary D, Srivastava VC, Mishra PK (2018) Exploring temple floral refuse for biochar production as a closed loop perspective for environmental management. Waste Manage 77:78–86
Singh R, Srivastava P, Singh P, Sharma AK, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS (2019a) Impact of rice-husk ash on the soil biophysical and agronomic parameters of wheat crop under a dry tropical ecosystem. Ecol Indic 105:505–515
Singh R, Singh P, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS (2019b) Impact of sole and combined application of biochar, organic and chemical fertilizers on wheat crop yield and water productivity in a dry tropical agro-ecosystem. Biochar 1:229–235
Singh R, Srivastava P, Bhadouria R, Yadav A, Singh H, Raghubanshi AS (2020) Combined application of biochar and farmyard manure reduces wheat crop eco-physiological performance in a tropical dryland agro-ecosystem. Energ Ecol Environ 5:171–183
Solaiman ZM, Murphy DV, Abbott LK (2012) Biochars influence seed germination and early growth of seedlings. Plant Soil 353:273–287
Song S, Arora S, Laserna AK, Shen Y, Thian BW, Cheong JC, Tan JK, Chiam Z, Fong SL, Ghosh S, Ok YS (2020) Biochar for urban agriculture: Impacts on soil chemical characteristics and on Brassica rapa growth, nutrient content and metabolism over multiple growth cycles. Sci Total Environ 727:138742
Tandon HL (1993) Methods of analysis of soils, plants, waters, and fertilisers. Tandon HL, editor. New Delhi: Fertiliser Development and Consultation Organisation.
Videgain-Marco M, Marco-Montori P, Martí-Dalmau C, Jaizme-Vega MD, Manyà-Cervelló JJ, García-Ramos FJ (2020) Effects of biochar application in a sorghum crop under greenhouse conditions: growth parameters and physicochemical fertility. Agronomy 10(1):104
Wang S, Zheng J, Wang Y, Yang Q, Chen T, Chen Y, Chi D, Xia G, Siddique KH, Wang T (2021) Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield of peanut in response to biochar application. Front Plant Sci 12:650432
Weidlich EW, Flórido FG, Sorrini TB, Brancalion PH (2020) Controlling invasive plant species in ecological restoration: A global review. J Appl Ecol 57:1806–1817
Xiao X, Chen B, Chen Z, Zhu L, Schnoor JL (2018) Insight into multiple and multilevel structures of biochars and their potential environmental applications: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 52:5027–5047
Yadav S, Singh D (2023) Assessment of biochar developed via torrefaction of food waste as feedstock for steam gasification to produce hydrogen rich gas. Carbon Res 2:34
Zhang Y, Huang Y, Hu J, Tang T, Xu C, Effiong KS, Xiao X (2024) Biochar mitigates the mineralization of allochthonous organic matter and global warming potential of saltmarshes by influencing functional bacteria. Carbon Res 3:6
Zhu Y, Wang H, Lv X, Zhang Y, Wang W (2020) Effects of biochar and biofertilizer on cadmium-contaminated cotton growth and the antioxidative defense system. Sci Rep 10:20112
Acknowledgements
Ipsa Gupta conducted the experiment, data collection and analysis, and prepared the initial draft and the finalized manuscript; Rishikesh Singh participated in preparing the draft, conducting analysis, and reviewing and finalizing the manuscript; Anupama Kaushik conducted analysis and contributed to the review and finalization of the article; Harminder Pal Singh designed the study and participated in reviewing and finalizing the article; Daizy R. Batish contributed to the conception and design of the study, and reviewing and finalizing the manuscript.
Statements and declarations
The authors declare that the data presented in this manuscript is their own work. The data would be made available on request to the corresponding author.
Funding
This study was funded by the University Grants Commission (UGC) and Science and Engineering Research Board (DST‒SERB, Grant PDF/2020/001607), New Delhi, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IG: Performed the experiment, Data Collection and analysis, Initial drafting and finalization; RS: Drafting, Analysis, Review and finalization; AK: Analysis, Review and finalization; HPS: Designing, Review and finalization; DRB: Conception, Designing, Review and finalization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest. All the authors have seen the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission to the journal.
Additional information
Handling Editor: Hailong Wang.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1:
Table S1. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) depicting differences in different plant growth parameters between biochar concentrations at 10 days after commencement of the laboratory experiment. Table S2. One-way ANOVA depicting differences in different plant growth parameters between biochar concentrations at 21 days after commencement of the dome experiment. Table S3. One-way ANOVA depicting differences in different plant eco-physiological parameters between biochar concentrations at 21 days after commencement of the dome experiment. Table S4. One-way ANOVA depicting differences in different post-harvest soil parameters between biochar concentrations at 21 days after commencement of the dome experiment. Fig. S1. Photograph showing the effect of biochar (a) powder and (b) extract on the growth of mung bean seedlings at different concentrations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gupta, I., Singh, R., Kaushik, A. et al. Comparative investigation of powder and extract of biochar from Broussonetia papyrifera on the growth and eco-physiological attributes of Vigna radiata. Carbon Res. 3, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-024-00112-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-024-00112-5