Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer to be diagnosed in both females and males necessitating identification of effective biomarkers. An in-silico system biology approach called weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) can be used to examine gene expression in a complicated network of regulatory genes. In the current study, the co-expression network of DEGs connected to CRC and their target genes was built using the WGCNA algorithm. GO and KEGG pathway analysis were carried out to learn more about the biological role of the DEmRNAs. These findings revealed that the genes were mostly enriched in the biological processes that were involved in the regulation of hormone levels, extracellular matrix organization, and extracellular structure organization. The intersection of genes between hub genes and DEmRNAs showed that DKC1, PA2G4, LYAR and NOLC1 were the clinically final hub genes of CRC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer to be diagnosed in both females and males in the USA. Approximately 41% of CRC cases involve the proximal colon, whereas 22% and 28% involve the distal colon and rectum, respectively1. By 2030, there would be a 90% increase in the incidence rate of CRC in the USA1. People are keen to look for new treatment approaches in such a difficult environment2. CRC patients usually show no conventional clinical symptoms or just non-specific indicators in the early stage, which results in a low incidence of early diagnosis even though early diagnosis can greatly improve the prognosis3. Since it can be detected and effectively treated, CRC is regarded to be almost the ideal cancer for screening as it can be prevented from developing and causing both mortality and morbidity during its clinical course4.
An in-silico system biology approach called weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) is used to examine gene expression in a complicated network of regulatory genes. This R-based tool uses genetic correlations to find modules that are highly connected. As a result, it is useful for discovering new cancer diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers5,6,7,8. Guo et al. found ten hub genes that could serve as viable biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and are associated with the progression of CRC9. In a separate study conducted by Cao et al., the hub genes TDRD5 and GPC1 were identified for prognosis prediction in CRC using WGCNA10. Using WGCNA, Lin et al. discovered that the complement and coagulation cascade, as well as the focal adhesion pathway, play a crucial role in the development and progression of CRC patients with liver metastasis. Additionally, they identified FGG, KNG1, CAV1, and SPP1 as potential metastatic markers that could aid in the early diagnosis of CRC11.
In the current study, the co-expression network of DEGs connected to CRC and their target genes was built using the WGCNA algorithm. This research will aid in the identification of viable biomarkers for CRC and further comprehension of the molecular mechanisms behind this cancer.
Methods
Microarray data acquisition
The following criteria were used to select all of the CRC datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO): (1) microarray-based mRNA expression profiles could be accessible; and (2) patients with CRC and healthy controls were estimated. Consequently, a total of three microarray datasets (GSE141174 [Illumina humanRef-8 v2.0 expression beadchip], GSE184093 [Agilent-067406 Human CBC lncRNA + mRNA microarray V4.0 (Probe name version)] and GSE206800 [Clariom_D_Human] Affymetrix Human Clariom D Assay [transcript (gene) version]) were included in this study. We excluded lymph node samples from dataset GSE141174 and metastasis samples from dataset GSE206800. In this analysis, a total of 39 samples (16 controls and 23 cases) were examined details are provided in Table 1.
Microarray data analysis and identification of differentially expressed mRNAs
Each of the microarray datasets were normalized using the normalizeQuantiles function in the preprocessCore package (Version 1.58) and then merged. Considering that the Agilent and Affymertix platform datasets for this study were merged, the batch effect and technical variation were eliminated using ComBat function in sva package (version 3.44.0)12.
Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA)
A scale-free network based on gene expression profiles was built using a systematic biological technique known as WGCNA. The R package WGCNA (version 1.72-1)5 was applied to create a weighted correlation network utilizing the mRNA expression profiles in the merged dataset in order to discover clinically meaningful modules of CRC. In summary, using the Pearson Correlation Coefficient test, the gene expression matrices were turned into matrices representing the similarities of paired mRNAs and then converted to adjacency matrices where the soft-threshold (power value) was applied to accentuate significant connections between genes and ignore weak correlations in the adjacency matrix. To represent the intensity of the connection between the genes, the adjacency matrix was then transformed into a topological overlap measure (TOM). Genes were analyzed via hierarchical clustering using TOM as an input, and network modules were found using the DynamicTreeCut function. Modules with high similarity scores were merged using a threshold value.
Construction of module-trait relationships and identification of modules hub genes
Module Eigengene (ME) was used to describe expression profiles of each module as the eigenvector related to the first principal component of the expression matrix in order to discover modules that were strongly linked to the clinical variables that were being examined. Also, the correlations between specific genes and the CRC trait were assessed using the estimates of gene significance (GS). Additionally, the ME correlation and the gene expression profile for each module were defined as module membership (MM). The most significant (central) components of the modules can be said to be closely connected to the trait if the GS and MM have a substantial correlation. Lastly, we chose the GS and MM genes that showed a correlation of 0.7 or higher, and we considered the identical genes between the two groups as the most important genes.
Protein–protein interaction network construction and hub clusters identification
The Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING, https://string-db.org/) database was used to build the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the genes with highest GS and MM. Confidence score > 0.7 was set as significant. The hub clusters were chosen, and functional annotation was carried out, using the Cytoscape software plug-in molecular complex detection (MCODE)13.
Gene ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of hub clusters
The biological process (BP), molecular function (MF), cellular component (CC), and KEGG pathway14,15,16 enrichment analysis of the mRNAs in the hub clusters were obtained utilizing ClusterProfiler R package (version 4.4.4)17. A criterion of an adjusted p value of 0.05 or less was established for the functional category.
Identification of hub genes in PPI network using multiple centralities
By using maximal clique centrality (MCC) algorithm via cytohubba18 plugin in cytoscape, we discovered hub genes in the PPI network. Finally, the intersection of genes between hub genes and DEGs were identified as final hub genes.
MiRNA- and TF-final hub genes regulatory networks
Using the NetworkAnalyst database19, connections between the final hub genes, transcription factors (TFs), and microRNAs (miRNAs) were established. The greatest degree in the networks was then found for each TF and miRNA.
The final hub genes' genetic alterations in CRC patients
Using the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics20, we examined the genetic changes of the final hub genes in CRC patients. We selected CRC datasets from the TCGA, which comprise 1510 CRC samples.
Verification of final hub genes via expression values
The UALCAN21 and GSCALite databases22, a Web server for Gene Set Cancer Analysis, were used to confirm the mRNA expression patterns of the final hub genes in colorectal adenocarcinoma (COAD) and normal samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA)23 was used to compare the protein expression of the final hub genes between COAD and normal tissues.
Results
Microarray data processing, integrative meta-analysis and assessment of data quality
The role of mRNAs in CRC was examined utilizing three expression datasets that included samples from CRC and healthy control individuals. Using the normalizeQuantiles function in the preprocessCore package, quantile normalization was used to independently normalize each dataset. Then, gene symbols were used to combine three datasets. Next, the ComBat function from the R Package Surrogate Variable Analysis (SVA) was employed to rule out batch effects (non-biological differences). The raw data and normalized data following batch effect removal boxplots are displayed in Figure S1. These boxplots show a consistent level of quality in the expression data. Also, the boxplot of the preprocessed data showed satisfactory normalization. The PCA plot of all samples in the 2D plane included by their first two main components (PC1 and PC2) is shown in Figure S2 (PC1 and PC2). After batch effect reduction, the samples exhibited a fair dispersion, as seen by this plot.
Identification of DEmRNAs for CRC
We analyzed the expression matrix between CRC and normal samples using the Limma package (version 3.52.3)24 and discovered 792 DEmRNAs, comprising 466 downregulated and 326 upregulated DEmRNAs (Table S1). Table 2 displays the top 10 DEmRNAs. The volcano plot was made using the EnhancedVolcano package (https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano) in R, allowing us to examine the changes in mRNA expression between CRC and normal samples (Fig. 1). Also, we utilized the R pheatmap package (version 1.0.12) (https://cran.r-project.org/package=pheatmap) to show the expression of the top up- and down-regulated DEmRNAs (Fig. 2A,B).
Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEmRNAs
GO and KEGG pathway analysis were carried out to learn more about the biological role of the DEmRNAs. These findings revealed that the genes were mostly enriched in the BPs that were involved in the regulation of hormone levels, extracellular matrix organization, and extracellular structure organization (Fig. 3A). According the KEGG pathway, the AGE-RAGE signaling pathway in diabetic complications, protein digestion and absorption, and PPAR signaling pathway were the three main categories where the genes were enriched (Fig. 3B).
Weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and functional annotation
A total of 39 samples from merged dataset were used for WGCNA using WGCNA package in R. Then, we used principal component analysis and samples hierarchical clustering to eliminate outlier samples (Fig. 4A,B). We eliminated 4 samples because of clustering and carried on with the analysis using the remaining data. Soft threshold value for the dataset was chosen with a cutoff R2 value of 0.9. As the network follows the power law distribution at this value (Fig. 4C), it is more similar to the condition of a true biological network. In order to merge the similar modules, the minimum module size was set to 30 with a 025 height cut (Fig. 4D). Figure 4E depicts every gene co-expression module. Twenty co-expressed gene modules were identified, with gray modules denoting genes that were not co-expressed. Each module was given a color name. With 24 genes, the royalblue module is the smallest. The turquoise module, which has 2434 genes, is also the biggest module at the moment. In addition, the 7659 genes that are not associated with any module are represented by the background's grey color (Table 3). For the enrichment analysis, we selected modules with correlation coefficients of 0.7 or above (Fig. 4F). As a result, turquoise (0.86), tan (0.72) and green (0.76) modules were selected for further analysis. By evaluating the correlation between module eigengenes (MEs) and traits and the correlation between gene expression profiles and traits, respectively, we measured the membership module (MM) of these three modules and gene significance (GS) (Table S2). The similar genes GS and MM were lastly regarded as the most significant genes (Fig. 4G).
Key modules PPI network construction, identification of top clusters and hub genes
The PPI network of most significant genes (Fig. 5A) with 294 nodes and 1416 edges that was created from STRING was put into the MCODE plugin of Cytoscape 3.9 in order to identify the hub clusters (MCODE score > 10) (Fig. 5B). We identified two clusters (Fig. 5C). The first cluster with a score of 16,889 contained UTP18, SDAD1, PWP1, POLR1E, RBM28, RSL1D1, NOLC1, WDR36, NIP7, NAT10, NOB1, UTP14A, DKC1, POLR1A, GTPBP4, ABCE1, WDR3 and TWISTNB and the second cluster with a score of 12,267 contained NUP188, NUP37, NUP85, NUP155, SNRPG, RPL31, RPS18, CCT4, RPL23A, RPS21, GNB2L1, RPL35A, RPL37A, RPL39, RPS15A, EFTUD2, LSM2, LSM5, SF3A3, PPIH, LSM7, SF3B3, SNRPD1, SNRPB2, RPL27, RPL12, SNRPD2, GEMIN6, NUP133, SNRPF and NUP205. Next, we performed GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of two hub clusters using clusterProfiler package in R (Fig. 5D,E).
PPI network hub genes detection
We identified hub genes of PPI network using cytohubba plugin. In this case, we selected 25 hub genes with highest maximal clique centrality (MCC) (Fig. 6A). Then, the intersection of genes between hub genes and DEmRNAs (Fig. 6B) showed that DKC1, PA2G4, LYAR and NOLC1 were the clinically final hub genes of CRC.
Analyzing the regulatory networks of the TF-final hub genes and miRNAs
There are several ways that miRNAs can control how genes are expressed. Networkanalyst online database was utilized to collect miRNAs that target hub genes (Fig. 7A), and in this case, we used the miRTarBase v8.0 database to discover hub miRNA interactions. Hsa-miR-16-5p was regarded as a key miRNA for the development of CRC because it interacted with the three final hub genes (degree 3). Also, we got TFs that target final hub genes from the NetworkAnalyst database (Fig. 7B), and we selected the ChEA database to find the TFs that do so. According to the TF-hub gene network, the E2F1 controls each of the four hub genes and may be important for the development of CRC.
The genetic alterations of final hub genes in CRC patients
In colorectal adenocarcinoma TCGA datasets, we looked at the final hub genes mutations using the cBioPortal database. These datasets contained 1510 samples from 3 studies. As a result, out of a total of 981 samples, gene DKC1 was altered in 9 samples, PA2G4 in 4, NOLC1 in 21, and LYAR in 17 samples (Fig. 8). Also, it was discovered that the LYAR and DKC1 co-occur with mutations, with a q value of less than 0.001 (Table 4).
Validation of the expression of the final hub genes
We looked up the expression patterns of the final five hub genes (DKC1, PA2G4, NOLC1, LYAR, and E2F1) in several databases to check their reliability. According to the UALCAN database, the expression levels of every gene were noticeably greater in COAD than in normal samples (Fig. 9A; Table 5). According to the Gene Set Cancer Analysis Lite (GSCALite) database, all of these hub genes were also considerably enhanced in COAD (Fig. 9B). The methylation of these genes was also examined using the GSCALite database, and we discovered that NOLC1 was hypomethylated based on methylation difference between tumor and normal samples in COAD (Fig. 9C), which may be connected to the high level of this gene expression in COAD. The Human Protein Atlas (HPA) database also revealed that protein levels of these five genes considerably greater in tumor samples compared to normal samples (Fig. 9D).
Discussion
CRC is regarded as a cancer with high burden in the world needing urgent identification of appropriate diagnostic biomarkers. High throughput techniques are valuable tools for comparison of expression profiles of normal and cancerous cells to find biomarkers. WGCNA is a method for identification of interconnections between genes and recognition of differentially expressed genes between two sets of samples25. In the current study, we used this method and find final five hub genes, namely DKC1, PA2G4, NOLC1, LYAR, and E2F1. Expression levels of these gene were noticeably greater in COAD than in normal samples. Notably, NOLC1 was hypomethylated in COAD. Therefore, overexpression of this gene can be explained by the phenomenon.
Functionally, DKC1 has been shown to enhance angiogenesis through increasing HIF-1α transcription. Moreover, DKC1 can facilitate metastasis in CRC26. PA2G4 has also been shown to be highly expressed in a variety of cancers, including cervical cancer, CRC, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and salivary carcinoma27,28,29,30. In hepatocellular carcinoma, PA2G4 can promote the metastasis through increasing stability of FYN transcript in a YTHDF2-dependent manner31. NOLC1 is involved in determination of multidrug resistance phenotype in non-small cell lung cancer32. LYAR has been found to promote CRC cell mobility through activating galectin-1 expression33. Finally, E2F1 is a transcription factor that binds to DNA with dimerization partner proteins. This transcription factor has fundamental roles in the development of CRC34.
Notably, these genes have been found to be mutated in CRC samples. Thus, several lines of evidence show fundamental roles of DKC1, PA2G4, NOLC1, LYAR, and E2F1 in CRC.
To sum up, the bioinformatics strategy used in the current study revealed important roles of DKC1, PA2G4, NOLC1, LYAR, and E2F1 in the CRC carcinogenesis and potentiates these genes as biomarkers for detection of CRC and therapeutic targets for this cancer.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available as GSE141174 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE141174), GSE184093 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE184093) and GSE206800 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE206800).
References
Cheng, L., Eng, C., Nieman, L. Z., Kapadia, A. S. & Du, X. L. Trends in colorectal cancer incidence by anatomic site and disease stage in the United States from 1976 to 2005. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e3181fe41ed (2011).
Xiao, Y., Li, T., Xue, Q. & Miao, L. Long non-coding RNA GHET1/miR-105/RAP2B axis regulates the progression of acute myeloid leukemia. J. Cancer 11, 7081–7090. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.47294 (2020).
Duan, B. et al. In Gastrointestinal Cancers (ed. Morgado-Diaz, J. A.) (Exon Publications, 2022).
Inadomi, J. M. et al. Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: A randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch. Intern. Med. 172, 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332 (2012).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 (2008).
Ghafouri-Fard, S., Hussen, B. M., Badrlou, E., Abak, A. & Taheri, M. MicroRNAs as important contributors in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111759 (2021).
Ghafouri-Fard, S. et al. Function of circular RNAs in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111721 (2021).
Ghafouri-Fard, S., Hussen, B. M., Gharebaghi, A., Eghtedarian, R. & Taheri, M. LncRNA signature in colorectal cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2021.153432 (2021).
Guo, C., Xie, B. & Liu, Q. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis combined with machine learning validation to identify key hub biomarkers in colorectal cancer. Funct. Integr. Genom. 23, 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-022-00949-2 (2022).
Cao, L. et al. Development and validation of an RBP gene signature for prognosis prediction in colorectal cancer based on WGCNA. Hereditas 160, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41065-023-00274-z (2023).
Lin, L. et al. Construction of a co-expression network and prediction of metastasis markers in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 13, 2426–2438. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo-22-965 (2022).
Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E. & Storey, J. D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034 (2012).
Bader, G. D. & Hogue, C. W. V. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinform. 4, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-2 (2003).
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).
Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D587-d592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac963 (2023).
Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3715 (2019).
Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 40: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation 2, 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 (2021).
Chin, C.-H. et al. cytoHubba: Identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst. Biol. 8, S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11 (2014).
Zhou, G. et al. NetworkAnalyst 3.0: A visual analytics platform for comprehensive gene expression profiling and meta-analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W234–W241. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz240 (2019).
Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: An open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.Cd-12-0095 (2012).
Chandrashekar, D. S. et al. UALCAN: A portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses. Neoplasia 19, 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2017.05.002 (2017).
Liu, C. J. et al. GSCALite: A web server for gene set cancer analysis. Bioinformatics 34, 3771–3772. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty411 (2018).
Uhlén, M. et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260419 (2015).
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47–e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007 (2015).
Qiu, X. et al. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis identified MYL9 and CNN1 are associated with recurrence in colorectal cancer. J. Cancer 11, 2348 (2020).
Hou, P. et al. DKC1 enhances angiogenesis by promoting HIF-1α transcription and facilitates metastasis in colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer 122, 668–679 (2020).
Liu, H., Li, Z., Li, L., Peng, H. & Zhang, Z. EBP1 suppresses growth, migration, and invasion of thyroid cancer cells through upregulating RASAL expression. Tumor Biol. 36, 8325–8331 (2015).
Liu, L., Xu, D., Yang, S. & Li, X. Ebp1 protein expression in cervical cancer tissue and its significance. Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 5496–5500 (2015).
Xu, Y., Cai, H., Tu, W., Ding, L. & Luo, R. Increased PA2G4 expression is an unfavorable factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 29, 513 (2021).
Sun, J. et al. Expression of ERBB3 binding protein 1 (EBP1) in salivary adenoid cystic carcinoma and its clinicopathological relevance. BMC Cancer 12, 1–8 (2012).
Sun, S. et al. PA2G4 promotes the metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by stabilizing FYN mRNA in a YTHDF2-dependent manner. Cell Biosci. 12, 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00788-5 (2022).
Huang, H. et al. Identification and validation of NOLC1 as a potential target for enhancing sensitivity in multidrug resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 23, 1–13 (2018).
Wu, Y. et al. LYAR promotes colorectal cancer cell mobility by activating galectin-1 expression. Oncotarget 6, 32890–32901. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5335 (2015).
Fang, Z., Lin, M., Li, C., Liu, H. & Gong, C. A comprehensive review of the roles of E2F1 in colon cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 10, 757–768 (2020).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the clinical Research Development Unit (CRDU) of Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran for their support, cooperation and assistance throughout the period of study.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.T. and E.J. designed and supervised the study. A.S. and M.T. performed the bio informatic analysis. S.G.F. wrote the draft and revised it. All the authors read the submitted version and approved it.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ghafouri-Fard, S., Safarzadeh, A., Taheri, M. et al. Identification of diagnostic biomarkers via weighted correlation network analysis in colorectal cancer using a system biology approach. Sci Rep 13, 13637 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40953-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40953-5
- Springer Nature Limited