Abstract
We apply point-particle effective field theory (PPEFT) to compute the leading shifts due to finite-sized source effects in the Coulomb bound energy levels of a relativistic spinless charged particle. This is the analogue for spinless electrons of calculating the contribution of the charge-radius of the source to these levels, and our calculation disagrees with standard calculations in several ways. Most notably we find there are two effective interactions with the same dimension that contribute to leading order in the nuclear size, one of which captures the standard charge-radius contribution. The other effective operator is a contact interaction whose leading contribution to δE arises linearly (rather than quadratically) in the small length scale, ϵ, characterizing the finite-size effects, and is suppressed by (Zα)5. We argue that standard calculations miss the contributions of this second operator because they err in their choice of boundary conditions at the source for the wave-function of the orbiting particle. PPEFT predicts how this boundary condition depends on the source’s charge radius, as well as on the orbiting particle’s mass. Its contribution turns out to be crucial if the charge radius satisfies ϵ ≲ (Zα)2 a B , where a B is the Bohr radius, because then relativistic effects become important for the boundary condition. We show how the problem is equivalent to solving the Schrödinger equation with competing Coulomb, inverse-square and delta-function potentials, which we solve explicitly. A similar enhancement is not predicted for the hyperfine structure, due to its spin-dependence. We show how the charge-radius effectively runs due to classical renormalization effects, and why the resulting RG flow is central to predicting the size of the energy shifts (and is responsible for its being linear in the source size). We discuss how this flow is relevant to systems having much larger-than-geometric cross sections, such as those with large scattering lengths and perhaps also catalysis of reactions through scattering with monopoles. Experimental observation of these effects would require more precise measurement of energy levels for mesonic atoms than are now possible.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Williams and L. Zalavári, Point-Particle Effective Field Theory I: Classical Renormalization and the Inverse-Square Potential, JHEP 04 (2017) 106 [arXiv:1612.07313] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, D. Hoover, C. de Rham and G. Tasinato, Effective Field Theories and Matching for Codimension-2 Branes, JHEP 03 (2009) 124 [arXiv:0812.3820] [INSPIRE].
A. Bayntun, C.P. Burgess and L. van Nierop, Codimension-2 Brane-Bulk Matching: Examples from Six and Ten Dimensions, New J. Phys. 12 (2010) 075015 [arXiv:0912.3039] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, P. Hayman, M. Rummel and L. Zalavári, Point-Particle Effective Theories III: Relativistic Fermions and the Dirac equation, in preparation.
P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell and B.N. Taylor, CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 035009 [INSPIRE].
C.G. Callan Jr., Monopole Catalysis of Baryon Decay, Nucl. Phys. B 212 (1983) 391 [INSPIRE].
V.A. Rubakov, Structure of the vacuum in gauge theories and monopole catalysis of proton decay, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26 (1983) 1111 [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 141 (1983) 714] [INSPIRE].
J. Preskill, Magnetic Monopoles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 34 (1984) 461.
R. Pohl, R. Gilman, G.A. Miller and K. Pachucki, Muonic hydrogen and the proton radius puzzle, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 63 (2013) 175 [arXiv:1301.0905] [INSPIRE].
C.E. Carlson, The Proton Radius Puzzle, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82 (2015) 59 [arXiv:1502.05314] [INSPIRE].
A. Pineda, The Chiral structure of the Lamb shift and the definition of the proton radius, Phys. Rev. C 71 (2005) 065205 [hep-ph/0412142] [INSPIRE].
C. Peset and A. Pineda, Model-independent determination of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton radius, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 32 [arXiv:1403.3408] [INSPIRE].
C. Peset and A. Pineda, The Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen and the proton radius from effective field theories, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (2015) 156 [arXiv:1508.01948] [INSPIRE].
T. Liu, A.A. Penin and A. Rayyan, Coulomb Artifacts and Bottomonium Hyperfine Splitting in Lattice NRQCD, JHEP 02 (2017) 084 [arXiv:1609.07151] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill and G. Paz, Model independent extraction of the proton charge radius from electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 113005 [arXiv:1008.4619] [INSPIRE].
K.A. Woodle et al., Measurement of the Lamb Shift in the N = 2 State of Muonium, Phys. Rev. A 41 (1990) 93 [INSPIRE].
V. Barger, C.-W. Chiang, W.-Y. Keung and D. Marfatia, Proton size anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 153001 [arXiv:1011.3519] [INSPIRE].
D. Tucker-Smith and I. Yavin, Muonic hydrogen and MeV forces, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 101702 [arXiv:1011.4922] [INSPIRE].
B. Batell, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, New Parity-Violating Muonic Forces and the Proton Charge Radius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 011803 [arXiv:1103.0721] [INSPIRE].
S.G. Karshenboim, D. McKeen and M. Pospelov, Constraints on muon-specific dark forces, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 073004 [Addendum ibid. D 90 (2014) 079905] [arXiv:1401.6154] [INSPIRE].
W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise, Renormalization group flows for brane couplings, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 025011 [hep-th/0104170] [INSPIRE].
C. de Rham, Classical renormalization of codimension-two brane couplings, AIP Conf. Proc. 957 (2007) 309 [arXiv:0710.4598] [INSPIRE].
E. Dudas, C. Papineau and V.A. Rubakov, Flowing to four dimensions, JHEP 03 (2006) 085 [hep-th/0512276] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, C. de Rham and L. van Nierop, The Hierarchy Problem and the Self-Localized Higgs, JHEP 08 (2008) 061 [arXiv:0802.4221] [INSPIRE].
R. Diener and C.P. Burgess, Bulk Stabilization, the Extra-Dimensional Higgs Portal and Missing Energy in Higgs Events, JHEP 05 (2013) 078 [arXiv:1302.6486] [INSPIRE].
F.A. Berezin and L.D. Faddeev, A Remark on Schrödinger’s equation with a singular potential, Sov. Math. Dokl. 2 (1961) 372 [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw, Delta function potentials in two-dimensional and three-dimensional quantum mechanics, in Diverse topics in theoretical and mathematical physics, World Scientific, Singapore (1995), pg. 35.
B. Holstein, Anomalies for pedestrians, Am. J. Phys. 61 (1993) 142.
A.M. Essin and D.J. Griffiths, Quantum mechanics of the 1/x 2 potential, Am. J. Phys. 74 (2006) 109.
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti and C.A. Garcia Canal, Renormalization of the inverse square potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 1590 [hep-th/0003014] [INSPIRE].
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti and C.A. Garcia Canal, Dimensional transmutation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics. 1. General theory, Annals Phys. 287 (2001) 14 [hep-th/0003255] [INSPIRE].
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti and C.A. Garcia Canal, Dimensional transmutation and dimensional regularization in quantum mechanics. 2. Rotational invariance, Annals Phys. 287 (2001) 57 [hep-th/0003267] [INSPIRE].
S.A. Coon and B.R. Holstein, Anomalies in Quantum Mechanics: the 1/r 2 Potential, Am. J. Phys. 70 (2002) 513 [quant-ph/0202091] [INSPIRE].
G.N.J. Ananos, H.E. Camblong and C.R. Ordonez, SO(2, 1) conformal anomaly: Beyond contact interactions, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 025006 [hep-th/0302197] [INSPIRE].
V. Efimov, Energy levels arising form the resonant two-body forces in a three-body system, Phys. Lett. B 33 (1970) 563.
V. Efimov, Energy levels of three resonantly interacting particles, Nucl. Phys. A 210 (1973) 157 [INSPIRE].
E. Braaten and H.W. Hammer, Universality in few-body systems with large scattering length, Phys. Rept. 428 (2006) 259 [cond-mat/0410417] [INSPIRE].
H.W. Hammer and L. Platter, Efimov physics from a renormalization group perspective, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 369 (2011) 2679 [arXiv:1102.3789].
K.M. Bulycheva and A.S. Gorsky, Limit cycles in renormalization group dynamics, Phys. Usp. 57 (2014) 171 [Usp. Fiz. Nauk 184 (2014) 182] [arXiv:1402.2431].
D.B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Conformality Lost, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 125005 [arXiv:0905.4752] [INSPIRE].
H. Weyl, Über gewöhnliche Differentialgleichungen mit Singularitäten und de zeugehörigen Entwicklungen willkürlicher Funktionen, Math. Ann. 68 (1910) 220.
J. von Neumann, Allgemeine Eigenwertheorie Hermitescher Funktionaloperatoren, Math. Ann. 102 (1929) 49.
M.H. Stone, On one-parameter unitary groups in Hilbert space, Ann. Math. 33 (1932) 643.
C.J. Fewster, On the energy levels of the hydrogen atom, hep-th/9305102 [INSPIRE].
H.E. Camblong, L.N. Epele, H. Fanchiotti, C.A. Garcia Canal and C.R. Ordonez, On the Inequivalence of Renormalization and Self-Adjoint Extensions for Quantum Singular Interactions, Phys. Lett. A 364 (2007) 458 [hep-th/0604018] [INSPIRE].
D.M. Gitman, I.V. Tyutin and B.L. Voronov, Self-adjoint extensions and spectral analysis in Calogero problem, arXiv:0903.5277 [INSPIRE].
S. Moroz and R. Schmidt, Nonrelativistic inverse square potential, scale anomaly and complex extension, Annals Phys. 325 (2010) 491 [arXiv:0909.3477] [INSPIRE].
D. Bouaziz and M. Bawin, Singular inverse-square potential: renormalization and self-adjoint extensions for medium to weak coupling, Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 022113 [arXiv:1402.5325] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Introduction to Effective Field Theory, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 57 (2007) 329 [hep-th/0701053] [INSPIRE].
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel. 7 (2004) 5 [gr-qc/0311082] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Erickson, Energy Levels of One electron Atoms, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6 (1977) 831.
J.L. Friar, Nuclear Finite Size Effects in Light Muonic Atoms, Annals Phys. 122 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
J.L. Friar and I. Sick, Muonic hydrogen and the third Zemach moment, Phys. Rev. A 72 (2005) 040502 [nucl-th/0508025] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill and G. Paz, Nucleon spin-averaged forward virtual Compton tensor at large Q 2, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 094017 [arXiv:1611.09917] [INSPIRE].
G. Backenstoss, Pionic atoms, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 20 (1970) 467.
U.G. Meissner, U. Raha and A. Rusetsky, Spectrum and decays of kaonic hydrogen, Eur. Phys. J. C 35 (2004) 349 [hep-ph/0402261] [INSPIRE].
B. Borasoy, U.G. Meissner and R. Nissler, K- p scattering length from scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 055201 [hep-ph/0606108] [INSPIRE].
Y. Yan, Kaonic hydrogen atom and K- p scattering length, arXiv:0905.4818 [INSPIRE].
S. Deser, M.L. Goldberger, K. Baumann and W.E. Thirring, Energy level displacements in pi mesonic atoms, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954) 774 [INSPIRE].
L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory, Pergamon Press, Oxford U.K. (1976).
G.A. Miller, Proton Polarizability Contribution: Muonic Hydrogen Lamb Shift and Elastic Scattering, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1078 [arXiv:1209.4667] [INSPIRE].
M. Horbatsch and E.A. Hessels, Evaluation of the strength of electron-proton scattering data for determining the proton charge radius, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2016) 015204 [arXiv:1509.05644] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill, Effective field theory for large logarithms in radiative corrections to electron proton scattering, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 013001 [arXiv:1605.02613] [INSPIRE].
M. Horbatsch, E.A. Hessels and A. Pineda, Proton radius from electron-proton scattering and chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. C 95 (2017) 035203 [arXiv:1610.09760] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill and G.P. Lepage, Order (α 2Γ, α 3Γ) binding effects in orthopositronium decay, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 111301 [hep-ph/0003277] [INSPIRE].
R.J. Hill, New value of m μ /m e from muonium hyperfine splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3280 [hep-ph/0010130] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1612.07334
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Burgess, C.P., Hayman, P., Rummel, M. et al. Point-particle effective field theory II: relativistic effects and Coulomb/inverse-square competition. J. High Energ. Phys. 2017, 72 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)072
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2017)072