Abstract
In a simple extension of the standard model (SM), a pair of vector like lepton doublets (L1 and L2) and a SU(2)L scalar doublet (η) have been introduced to help in accommodating the discrepancy in determination of the anomalous magnetic moments of the light leptons, namely, e and μ. Moreover, to make our scenario friendly to a Dirac like neutrino and also for a consistent dark matter phenomenology, we specifically add a singlet scalar (S) and a singlet fermion (ψ) in the set-up. However, the singlet states also induce a meaningful contribution in other charged lepton processes. A discrete symmetry \( {\mathcal{Z}}_2\times {\mathcal{Z}}_2^{\prime } \) has been imposed under which all the SM particles are even while the new particles may be assumed to have odd charges. In a bottom-up approach, with a minimal particle content, we systematically explore the available parameter space in terms of couplings and masses of the new particles. Here a number of observables associated with the SM leptons have been considered, e.g., masses and mixings of neutrinos, (g − 2) anomalies of e, μ, charged lepton flavor violating (cLFV) observables and the dark matter (DM) phenomenology of a singlet-doublet dark matter. Neutrinos, promoted as the Dirac type states, acquire mass at one loop level after the discrete \( {\mathcal{Z}}_2^{\prime } \) symmetry gets softly broken, while the unbroken \( {\mathcal{Z}}_2 \) keeps the dark matter stable. The mixing between the singlet ψ and the doublet vector lepton can be constrained to satisfy the electroweak precision observables and the spin independent (SI) direct detection (DD) cross section of the dark matter. In this analysis, potentially important LHC bounds have also been discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 08 (2016) 045 [arXiv:1606.02266] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of Higgs boson production and decay using up to 80 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 012002 [arXiv:1909.02845] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A11 [arXiv:1507.02704] [INSPIRE].
WMAP collaboration, Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208 (2013) 19 [arXiv:1212.5226] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B B 67 (1977) 421.
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex Spinors and Unified Theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
S. Kanemura, T. Nabeshima and H. Sugiyama, Neutrino Masses from Loop-Induced Dirac Yukawa Couplings, Phys. Lett. B 703 (2011) 66 [arXiv:1106.2480] [INSPIRE].
S. Kanemura, T. Nabeshima and H. Sugiyama, TeV-Scale Seesaw with Loop-Induced Dirac Mass Term and Dark Matter from U(1)B−L Gauge Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 033004 [arXiv:1111.0599] [INSPIRE].
Y. Farzan and E. Ma, Dirac neutrino mass generation from dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 033007 [arXiv:1204.4890] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and O. Popov, Pathways to Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Masses, Phys. Lett. B 764 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1609.02538] [INSPIRE].
S. Kanemura, K. Sakurai and H. Sugiyama, Probing Models of Dirac Neutrino Masses via the Flavor Structure of the Mass Matrix, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 465 [arXiv:1603.08679] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Yao and G.-J. Ding, Systematic Study of One-Loop Dirac Neutrino Masses and Viable Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095004 [Erratum ibid. 98 (2018) 039901] [arXiv:1707.09786] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Radiative Left-Right Dirac Neutrino Mass, Phys. Lett. B 776 (2018) 54 [arXiv:1707.07698] [INSPIRE].
S. Singirala, R. Mohanta and S. Patra, Singlet scalar Dark matter in U(1)B−L models without right-handed neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) 477 [arXiv:1704.01107] [INSPIRE].
J. Calle, D. Restrepo, C. E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, Minimal radiative Dirac neutrino mass models, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 075008 [arXiv:1812.05523] [INSPIRE].
C.-Y. Yao and G.-J. Ding, Systematic analysis of Dirac neutrino masses from a dimension five operator, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095042 [arXiv:1802.05231] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah, B. Karmakar and D. Nanda, Common Origin of Dirac Neutrino Mass and Freeze-in Massive Particle Dark Matter, JCAP 07 (2018) 039 [arXiv:1805.11115] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Scotogenic U(1)χ Dirac neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 411 [arXiv:1901.09091] [INSPIRE].
A. Dasgupta, S. K. Kang and O. Popov, Radiative Dirac neutrino mass, neutrinoless quadruple beta decay, and dark matter in B-L extension of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075030 [arXiv:1903.12558] [INSPIRE].
A. Das, T. Nomura, H. Okada and S. Roy, Generation of a radiative neutrino mass in the linear seesaw framework, charged lepton flavor violation, and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 075001 [arXiv:1704.02078] [INSPIRE].
Y. Cai, J. Herrero-García, M. A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R. R. Volkas, From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models, Front. in Phys. 5 (2017) 63 [arXiv:1706.08524] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
J. Calle, D. Restrepo and O. Zapata, Dirac neutrino mass generation from a Majorana messenger, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035004 [arXiv:1909.09574] [INSPIRE].
S. Jana, P. K. Vishnu and S. Saad, Minimal realizations of Dirac neutrino mass from generic one-loop and two-loop topologies at d = 5, JCAP 04 (2020) 018 [arXiv:1910.09537] [INSPIRE].
D. Nanda and D. Borah, Connecting Light Dirac Neutrinos to a Multi-component Dark Matter Scenario in Gauged B − L Model, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 557 [arXiv:1911.04703] [INSPIRE].
J. Leite, A. Morales, J. W. F. Valle and C. A. Vaquera-Araujo, Scotogenic dark matter and Dirac neutrinos from unbroken gauged B − L symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135537 [arXiv:2003.02950] [INSPIRE].
P. Escribano, M. Reig and A. Vicente, Generalizing the Scotogenic model, JHEP 07 (2020) 097 [arXiv:2004.05172] [INSPIRE].
S.-Y. Guo and Z.-L. Han, Observable Signatures of Scotogenic Dirac Model, JHEP 12 (2020) 062 [arXiv:2005.08287] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and M. Raidal, Neutrino mass, muon anomalous magnetic moment, and lepton flavor nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 011802 [Erratum ibid. 87 (2001) 159901] [hep-ph/0102255] [INSPIRE].
F. S. Queiroz and W. Shepherd, New Physics Contributions to the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment: A Numerical Code, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 095024 [arXiv:1403.2309] [INSPIRE].
M. Lindner, M. Platscher and F. S. Queiroz, A Call for New Physics : The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavor Violation, Phys. Rept. 731 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1610.06587] [INSPIRE].
K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, Expectations for the muon g − 2 in simplified models with dark matter, JHEP 09 (2017) 112 [arXiv:1707.00753] [INSPIRE].
R. Dermisek and A. Raval, Explanation of the Muon g − 2 Anomaly with Vectorlike Leptons and its Implications for Higgs Decays, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 013017 [arXiv:1305.3522] [INSPIRE].
Z. Poh and S. Raby, Vectorlike leptons: Muon g − 2 anomaly, lepton flavor violation, Higgs boson decays, and lepton nonuniversality, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015032 [arXiv:1705.07007] [INSPIRE].
B. Barman, D. Borah, L. Mukherjee and S. Nandi, Correlating the anomalous results in b → s decays with inert Higgs doublet dark matter and muon (g − 2), Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115010 [arXiv:1808.06639] [INSPIRE].
C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Influence of an inert charged Higgs boson on the muon g − 2 and radiative neutrino masses in a scotogenic model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015024 [arXiv:1903.03380] [INSPIRE].
A. S. De Jesus, S. Kovalenko, F. S. Queiroz, C. Siqueira and K. Sinha, Vectorlike leptons and inert scalar triplet: Lepton flavor violation, g − 2, and collider searches, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035004 [arXiv:2004.01200] [INSPIRE].
T. Cohen, J. Kearney, A. Pierce and D. Tucker-Smith, Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 075003 [arXiv:1109.2604] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and D. Sanford, Simplified Models of Mixed Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2014) 011 [arXiv:1311.5896] [INSPIRE].
A. Vicente and C. E. Yaguna, Probing the scotogenic model with lepton flavor violating processes, JHEP 02 (2015) 144 [arXiv:1412.2545] [INSPIRE].
D. Restrepo, A. Rivera, M. Sánchez-Peláez, O. Zapata and W. Tangarife, Radiative Neutrino Masses in the Singlet-Doublet Fermion Dark Matter Model with Scalar Singlets, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 013005 [arXiv:1504.07892] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti and P. Tziveloglou, Singlet-Doublet Model: Dark matter searches and LHC constraints, JHEP 10 (2015) 116 [arXiv:1505.03867] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu, Minimal vectorlike leptonic dark matter and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 115040 [arXiv:1510.02760] [INSPIRE].
C. E. Yaguna, Singlet-Doublet Dirac Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 115002 [arXiv:1510.06151] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, 2HDM portal for Singlet-Doublet Dark Matter, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 864 [arXiv:1804.04930] [INSPIRE].
P. Konar, A. Mukherjee, A. K. Saha and S. Show, Linking pseudo-Dirac dark matter to radiative neutrino masses in a singlet-doublet scenario, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015024 [arXiv:2001.11325] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
LUX collaboration, Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 251302 [arXiv:1705.03380] [INSPIRE].
J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton Number as the Fourth Color, Phys. Rev. D 10 (1974) 275 [Erratum ibid. 11 (1975) 703] [INSPIRE].
R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, A Natural Left-Right Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2558 [INSPIRE].
G. Senjanović and R. N. Mohapatra, Exact Left-Right Symmetry and Spontaneous Violation of Parity, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 1502 [INSPIRE].
C. S. Aulakh, K. Benakli and G. Senjanović, Reconciling supersymmetry and left-right symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 2188 [hep-ph/9703434] [INSPIRE].
P. Duka, J. Gluza and M. Zralek, Quantization and renormalization of the manifest left-right symmetric model of electroweak interactions, Annals Phys. 280 (2000) 336 [hep-ph/9910279] [INSPIRE].
C. Arbeláez, M. Hirsch, M. Malinský and J. C. Romão, LHC-scale left-right symmetry and unification, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 035002 [arXiv:1311.3228] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, C. Hohl, S. F. King and V. Susic, Non-universal Z′ from SO(10) GUTs with vector-like family and the origin of neutrino masses, Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 578 [arXiv:1712.05366] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and \( \alpha \left({M}_Z^2\right) \): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 030001 [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
S. Borsányi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature 593 (2021) 51 [arXiv:2002.12347] [INSPIRE].
M. Passera, W. J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, The Muon g − 2 and the bounds on the Higgs boson mass, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013009 [arXiv:0804.1142] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and \( \alpha \left({m}_Z^2\right) \) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [arXiv:1706.09436] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to \( \boldsymbol{\alpha} \left({m}_Z^2\right) \), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Constraints on the two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Lett. B 814 (2021) 136073 [arXiv:2010.07943] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, C. A. Manzari and M. Montull, Hadronic Vacuum Polarization: (g − 2)μ versus Global Electroweak Fits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 091801 [arXiv:2003.04886] [INSPIRE].
A. Keshavarzi, W. J. Marciano, M. Passera and A. Sirlin, Muon g − 2 and ∆α connection, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 033002 [arXiv:2006.12666] [INSPIRE].
B. Malaescu and M. Schott, Impact of correlations between aμ and αQED on the EW fit, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 46 [arXiv:2008.08107] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g − 2 Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 072002 [arXiv:2104.03247] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, S. Heinemeyer and I. Saha, The new “MUON G-2” result and supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 1114 [arXiv:2104.03287] [INSPIRE].
M. Chakraborti, L. Roszkowski and S. Trojanowski, GUT-constrained supersymmetry and dark matter in light of the new (g − 2)μ determination, JHEP 05 (2021) 252 [arXiv:2104.04458] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, L. Calibbi, M. Fedele and F. Mescia, Muon g − 2 and B-anomalies from Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 061802 [arXiv:2104.03228] [INSPIRE].
J. C. Criado, A. Djouadi, N. Koivunen, K. Müürsepp, M. Raidal and H. Veermäe, Confronting spin-3/2 and other new fermions with the muon g − 2 measurement, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136491 [arXiv:2104.03231] [INSPIRE].
F. Wang, L. Wu, Y. Xiao, J. M. Yang and Y. Zhang, GUT-scale constrained SUSY in light of new muon g-2 measurement, Nucl. Phys. B 970 (2021) 115486 [arXiv:2104.03262] [INSPIRE].
M. Ibe, S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakayama and S. Shirai, Muon g − 2 in gauge mediation without SUSY CP problem, JHEP 07 (2021) 098 [arXiv:2104.03289] [INSPIRE].
K. S. Babu, S. Jana, M. Lindner and V. P. K, Muon g − 2 anomaly and neutrino magnetic moments, JHEP 10 (2021) 240 [arXiv:2104.03291] [INSPIRE].
Y. Bai and J. Berger, Muon g − 2 in Lepton Portal Dark Matter, arXiv:2104.03301 [INSPIRE].
W.-Y. Keung, D. Marfatia and P.-Y. Tseng, Axion-Like Particles, Two-Higgs-Doublet Models, Leptoquarks, and the Electron and Muon g − 2, LHEP 2021 (2021) 209 [arXiv:2104.03341] [INSPIRE].
P. Athron, C. Balázs, D. H. J. Jacob, W. Kotlarski, D. Stöckinger and H. Stöckinger-Kim, New physics explanations of aμ in light of the FNAL muon g − 2 measurement, JHEP 09 (2021) 080 [arXiv:2104.03691] [INSPIRE].
A. Aboubrahim, M. Klasen and P. Nath, What the Fermilab muon g−2 experiment tells us about discovering supersymmetry at high luminosity and high energy upgrades to the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035039 [arXiv:2104.03839] [INSPIRE].
P. Escribano, J. Terol-Calvo and A. Vicente, (g − 2)e,μ in an extended inverse type-III seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 115018 [arXiv:2104.03705] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, S. Iwamoto and T. Kitahara, Supersymmetric interpretation of the muon g − 2 anomaly, JHEP 07 (2021) 075 [arXiv:2104.03217] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin and M. Hoferichter, Consequences of chirally enhanced explanations of (g − 2)μ for h → μμ and Z → μμ, JHEP 07 (2021) 135 [arXiv:2104.03202] [INSPIRE].
D. Zhang, Radiative neutrino masses, lepton flavor mixing and muon g − 2 in a leptoquark model, JHEP 07 (2021) 069 [arXiv:2105.08670] [INSPIRE].
W. Yin, Muon g − 2 anomaly in anomaly mediation, JHEP 06 (2021) 029 [arXiv:2104.03259] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama, T. Kinoshita and M. Nio, Revised and Improved Value of the QED Tenth-Order Electron Anomalous Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 036001 [arXiv:1712.06060] [INSPIRE].
R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].
G. F. Giudice, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g − 2, JHEP 11 (2012) 113 [arXiv:1208.6583] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g − 2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113002 [arXiv:1807.11484] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang, A light complex scalar for the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments, JHEP 03 (2019) 008 [arXiv:1810.11028] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta and Y. Mimura, Electron g − 2 with flavor violation in MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 563 [arXiv:1811.10209] [INSPIRE].
A. E. Cárcamo Hernández, S. F. King, H. Lee and S. J. Rowley, Is it possible to explain the muon and electron g − 2 in a Z′ model?, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 115016 [arXiv:1910.10734] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Axionlike Particles, Lepton-Flavor Violation, and a New Explanation of aμ and ae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211803 [arXiv:1908.00008] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari, Hunting for ALPs with Lepton Flavor Violation, JHEP 01 (2020) 158 [arXiv:1911.06279] [INSPIRE].
G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D. F. Litim and T. Steudtner, Anomalous magnetic moments from asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 071901 [arXiv:1910.14062] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer and S. Saad, μ → eγ selecting scalar leptoquark solutions for the (g − 2)e,μ puzzles, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075007 [arXiv:2006.11624] [INSPIRE].
A. E. Cárcamo Hernández, Y. Hidalgo Velásquez, S. Kovalenko, H. N. Long, N. A. Pérez-Julve and V. V. Vien, Fermion spectrum and g − 2 anomalies in a low scale 3-3-1 model, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 191 [arXiv:2002.07347] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, M. L. López-Ibáñez, A. Melis and O. Vives, Muon and electron g − 2 and lepton masses in flavor models, JHEP 06 (2020) 087 [arXiv:2003.06633] [INSPIRE].
F. J. Botella, F. Cornet-Gomez and M. Nebot, Electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in general flavour conserving two Higgs doublets models, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035023 [arXiv:2006.01934] [INSPIRE].
S. Jana, V. P. K. and S. Saad, Resolving electron and muon g − 2 within the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 115037 [arXiv:2003.03386] [INSPIRE].
C. Hati, J. Kriewald, J. Orloff and A. M. Teixeira, Anomalies in 8 Be nuclear transitions and (g − 2)e,μ: towards a minimal combined explanation, JHEP 07 (2020) 235 [arXiv:2005.00028] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li, Explaining (g − 2)μ,e, the KOTO anomaly and the MiniBooNE excess in an extended Higgs model with sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 055017 [arXiv:2006.01319] [INSPIRE].
C. Arbeláez, R. Cepedello, R. M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, (g − 2) anomalies and neutrino mass, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075005 [arXiv:2007.11007] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo and W. Yin, Explaining electron and muon g − 2 anomaly in SUSY without lepton-flavor mixings, JHEP 08 (2019) 122 [arXiv:1906.08768] [INSPIRE].
M. Badziak and K. Sakurai, Explanation of electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in the MSSM, JHEP 10 (2019) 024 [arXiv:1908.03607] [INSPIRE].
L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature 588 (2020) 61 [INSPIRE].
A. M. Baldini et al., MEG Upgrade Proposal, arXiv:1301.7225 [INSPIRE].
A. Blondel et al., Research Proposal for an Experiment to Search for the Decay μ → eee, arXiv:1301.6113 [INSPIRE].
Mu3e collaboration, Status of the Mu3e Experiment at PSI, EPJ Web Conf. 118 (2016) 01028 [arXiv:1605.02906] [INSPIRE].
SINDRUM collaboration, Search for the Decay μ+ → e+ e+ e−, Nucl. Phys. B 299 (1988) 1 [INSPIRE].
T. Aushev et al., Physics at Super B Factory, arXiv:1002.5012 [INSPIRE].
BaBar and Belle collaborations, The Physics of the B Factories, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3026 [arXiv:1406.6311] [INSPIRE].
MEG collaboration, Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+ → e+ γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 434 [arXiv:1605.05081] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Searches for Lepton Flavor Violation in the Decays τ ± → e± γ and τ ± → μ± γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 021802 [arXiv:0908.2381] [INSPIRE].
K. Hayasaka et al., Search for Lepton Flavor Violating Tau Decays into Three Leptons with 719 Million Produced τ + τ − Pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 139 [arXiv:1001.3221] [INSPIRE].
K. Kannike, Vacuum Stability Conditions From Copositivity Criteria, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2093 [arXiv:1205.3781] [INSPIRE].
A. Datta, N. Ganguly, N. Khan and S. Rakshit, Exploring collider signatures of the inert Higgs doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 015017 [arXiv:1610.00648] [INSPIRE].
M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and A. Strumia, Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2, Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127 [hep-ph/0405040] [INSPIRE].
G. Cynolter and E. Lendvai, Electroweak Precision Constraints on Vector-like Fermions, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 463 [arXiv:0804.4080] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall and V. S. Rychkov, Improved naturalness with a heavy Higgs: An Alternative road to LHC physics, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 015007 [hep-ph/0603188] [INSPIRE].
B. Barman, D. Borah, P. Ghosh and A. K. Saha, Flavoured gauge extension of singlet-doublet fermionic dark matter: neutrino mass, high scale validity and collider signatures, JHEP 10 (2019) 275 [arXiv:1907.10071] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy lepton resonances decaying to a Z boson and a lepton in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 09 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1506.01291] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for vectorlike leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052003.
CMS collaboration, Search for vector-like leptons in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 052003 [arXiv:1905.10853] [INSPIRE].
S. Bißmann, G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu and D. F. Litim, Multi-lepton signatures of vector-like leptons with flavor, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 101 [arXiv:2011.12964] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, B. Dumont, A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann, S. Kraml and D. Sengupta, Dilepton constraints in the Inert Doublet Model from Run 1 of the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 115011 [arXiv:1503.07367] [INSPIRE].
ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL and LEP collaborations, Search for Charged Higgs bosons: Combined Results Using LEP Data, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2463 [arXiv:1301.6065] [INSPIRE].
P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, C. A. Ternes, M. Tortola and J. W. F. Valle, Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 633 [arXiv:1708.01186] [INSPIRE].
J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe and M. Yamaguchi, Lepton flavor violation via right-handed neutrino Yukawa couplings in supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 2442 [hep-ph/9510309] [INSPIRE].
E. Arganda and M. J. Herrero, Testing supersymmetry with lepton flavor violating tau and mu decays, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 055003 [hep-ph/0510405] [INSPIRE].
M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, F. Staub, A. Abada, A. Vicente and C. Weiland, Decoupling of heavy sneutrinos in low-scale seesaw models, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 013008 [arXiv:1312.5318] [INSPIRE].
M. Hirsch, F. Staub and A. Vicente, Enhancing li → 3lj with the Z0-penguin, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 113013 [Erratum ibid. 91 (2015) 059902] [arXiv:1202.1825] [INSPIRE].
E. Arganda and M. J. Herrero, Remark on the one-loop Z form factors for LFV Z-penguin diagrams in SUSY, arXiv:1403.6161 [INSPIRE].
A. Abada, D. Das and C. Weiland, Enhanced Higgs Mediated Lepton Flavour Violating Processes in the Supersymmetric Inverse Seesaw Model, JHEP 03 (2012) 100 [arXiv:1111.5836] [INSPIRE].
K. S. Babu and C. Kolda, Higgs mediated τ → 3μ in the supersymmetric seesaw model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 241802 [hep-ph/0206310] [INSPIRE].
A. Dedes, J. R. Ellis and M. Raidal, Higgs mediated \( {B}_{s,d}^0 \) → μτ, eτ and τ → 3μ, eμμ decays in supersymmetric seesaw models, Phys. Lett. B 549 (2002) 159 [hep-ph/0209207] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Combination of searches for invisible Higgs boson decays with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 231801 [arXiv:1904.05105] [INSPIRE].
M. Dam, Tau-lepton Physics at the FCC-ee circular e+ e− Collider, SciPost Phys. Proc. 1 (2019) 041 [arXiv:1811.09408] [INSPIRE].
CEPC Study Group collaboration, CEPC Conceptual Design Report: Volume 2 – Physics & Detector, arXiv:1811.10545 [INSPIRE].
FCC collaboration, FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider : Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. ST 228 (2019) 261 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for the lepton flavor violating decay Z→eμ in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 072010 [arXiv:1408.5774] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for charged-lepton-flavour violation in Z -boson decays with the ATLAS detector, Nature Phys. 17 (2021) 819 [arXiv:2010.02566] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for lepton-flavor-violation in Z -boson decays with τ -leptons with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2022) 271801 [arXiv:2105.12491] [INSPIRE].
D. Delepine and F. Vissani, Indirect bounds on Z → μe and lepton flavor violation at future colliders, Phys. Lett. B 522 (2001) 95 [hep-ph/0106287] [INSPIRE].
A. Flores-Tlalpa, J. M. Hernandez, G. Tavares-Velasco and J. J. Toscano, Effective Lagrangian description of the lepton flavor violating decays \( \overrightarrow{Z}\to {l}_i^{\pm }{l}_j^{\pm } \), Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 073010 [hep-ph/0112065] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059] [INSPIRE].
G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].
A. Semenov, LanHEP: A Package for the automatic generation of Feynman rules in field theory. Version 3.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 431 [arXiv:0805.0555] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, Direct Detection of Non-Chiral Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 015004 [arXiv:0710.1668] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, Y. Mambrini and F. Richard, Z-portal dark matter, JCAP 03 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1411.2985] [INSPIRE].
K. Hamaguchi and K. Ishikawa, Prospects for Higgs- and Z-resonant Neutralino Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 055009 [arXiv:1510.05378] [INSPIRE].
D. Das, B. De and S. Mitra, Cancellation in Dark Matter-Nucleon Interactions: the Role of Non-Standard-Model-like Yukawa Couplings, Phys. Lett. B 815 (2021) 136159 [arXiv:2011.13225] [INSPIRE].
A. Bhaskar, D. Das, B. De and S. Mitra, Enhancing scalar productions with leptoquarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035002 [arXiv:2002.12571] [INSPIRE].
PandaX-II collaboration, Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 181302 [arXiv:1708.06917] [INSPIRE].
LUX-ZEPLIN collaboration, Projected WIMP sensitivity of the LUX-ZEPLIN dark matter experiment, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 052002 [arXiv:1802.06039] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2106.00979
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
De, B., Das, D., Mitra, M. et al. Magnetic moments of leptons, charged lepton flavor violations and dark matter phenomenology of a minimal radiative Dirac neutrino mass model. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 202 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)202
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)202