Abstract
Major stores of glucose are found as glycogen in skeletal muscle and liver. Skeletal muscle is a heterogenous tissue, with cellular metabolic and contractile distinctions dependent on whether the cell (fibre) is slow-twitch (Type I) or fast-twitch (Type II). We hypothesised that proteins important for glycogen metabolism would be differentially abundant between these diverse fibres. We further hypothesised that the cellular location of these proteins would be different in muscle samples between control (CON) and individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We dissected individual muscle fibre segments from vastus lateralis skeletal muscle biopsy samples from CON and T2D and used cell-type-specific approaches to address muscle heterogeneity. We measured glycogen and glycogen-related proteins by immunoblotting techniques. A lower proportion of Type I fibres was found in muscle in T2D compared with CON. AMPK-β2, glycogen branching enzyme (GBE), glycogen debranching enzyme (GDE), and glycogen phosphorylase (GP) were differentially localized between fibre types and in fibres from CON and T2D individuals. A key novel finding was that the majority of glycogen is loosely bound or cytosolic in location in human skeletal muscle. The proportion of this diffusible pool of glycogen was significantly lower in Type I fibres in T2D compared to CON. A hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp in people with type 2 diabetes had no effect on the proportion of diffusible glycogen. We identify cell-type as an important consideration when assessing glycogen metabolism in muscle. Our findings demonstrate varying glucose handling abilities in specific muscle fibre types in type 2 diabetes. A model is presented to provide an overview of the cell-specific differences in glycogen metabolism in type 2 diabetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Skeletal muscle is critical for maintaining whole body glucose homeostasis and impaired glucose regulation can result in type 2 diabetes [1]. Skeletal muscle is a heterogeneous tissue composed of different cell (fibre) types classified according to the specific myosin heavy chain isoform (MHC) present. Type I (slow-twitch) and Type II (fast-twitch) fibres are distinct in their contractile and metabolic characteristics [2]. Studies have indicated a fibre type dependent rate of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake with a higher glucose uptake related to the oxidative capacity of the muscle fibre (Type I << IIa < IIx < IIb) in both rats [3,4,5] and humans [6]. Furthermore, several studies in humans have demonstrated positive correlations between the proportion of Type I fibres in muscle and whole-body insulin sensitivity [6,7,8]. Together these findings indicate that human Type I fibres have a greater influence in maintaining glucose homeostasis than Type II fibres. Furthermore, a reduction in the proportion of Type I fibres in muscle from patients with type 2 diabetes has been observed in several [8,9,10,11], but not all [6, 12] studies.
There are several key signalling proteins and enzymes vital to the regulation of glucose metabolism. Alteration in abundance or regulation of these could be a driving factor leading to fibre-type-specific differences in glucose regulation. Glycogen is a branched polymer of glucose and is the main glucose source within contracting skeletal muscle. Glycogen synthesis is initiated by the auto-glycosylation of glycogenin and elongated by the activities of glycogen synthase (GS) and glycogen branching enzyme (GBE) [13]. Glucose is mobilized from glycogen by the concerted action of glycogen phosphorylase (GP) and glycogen debranching enzyme (GDE) acting in reverse to GS and GBE [14]. In rat skeletal muscle the abundance of GDE and GP was higher in type II dominant muscle whereas GBE abundance was higher in Type I dominant muscle and GS showed no fibre type dependency [15, 16]. Given this direct influence glycogen has on glucose metabolism, it suggests the abundance of glycogen-related proteins and their involvement in glycogen synthesis and degradation may differentially impact glucose regulation in different fibre types. It is feasible to think intracellular glycogen metabolism may be different between muscle fibre types given that type 2 diabetes results in differences in proteins important for glucose regulation such as AMPK (see below) and that these proteins are differentially expressed in muscle fibre types. Using mass spectrometry, it has been shown that proteins related to glycogen metabolism are fibre type dependent in human skeletal muscle, although details for which specific proteins were not presented [17]. The movement of glycogen-related proteins have yet to be elucidated in human muscle fibres.
AMPK is widely regarded as a super metabolic regulator and is reported to regulate and/or interact with glycogen-related proteins and GLUT4 [18]. We have previously reported AMPKβ1 levels are higher in Type I compared with Type II human muscle fibres [19]. However, it is unknown if this translates to differences in the how fibre types respond to insulin. In addition to the abundances of proteins, their localization is an important factor influencing cellular processes and, in this case, glucose regulation. It has been suggested that the AMPKβ isoforms are membrane bound in human skeletal muscle [20], although in rat skeletal muscle we have reported that ~ 75% of the total AMPK pool is diffusible and thus likely of cytosolic localisation [16]. Regardless of its localisation in resting skeletal muscle, AMPK phosphorylation may result in its movement in muscle and hence regulation [21]. In addition, it is possible that any dysregulation in the ability for AMPK to move within muscle may result in biologically relevant alterations in glycogen regulation which could be a confounding factor in type 2 diabetes.
The major aims of this study were to examine the fundamental fibre-specific abundance and intracellular localization/diffusibility of several key glycogen-related proteins in healthy individuals and people with type 2 diabetes, and to determine whether increased insulin, administered as a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp, alters this expression in skeletal muscle from people with type 2 diabetes. This was achieved by examining single fibres expressing either MHC I or II dissected from human vastus lateralis biopsies from control and people with type 2 diabetes; the latter at rest and following a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp.
Research design and methods
Participants
Eleven control (CON) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) participants are included, who were involved in two separate previously published studies conducted at Deakin University [22] and Victoria University [23], both universities being located in Melbourne, Victoria. Samples were collected over a 5-month period. All samples were taken at rest during the morning. Both studies were approved by the appropriate ethics committee and carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki II. CON individuals (8 male and 3 female) mean (± SD) age 62 ± 13 years, height 170 ± 9 cm and weight, 74 ± 12 kg and no medical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. T2D individuals (10 male and 1 female) mean (± SD) age was 59 ± 9 years, height 172 ± 0.1 cm, weight 90 ± 12 kg, diabetes duration 5.4 ± 5 years. Metabolic characteristics of the type 2 diabetes participants have been published, and all were from the placebo trial [22]. A limitation of the study was the inclusion of males and females; however this was unlikely to be a concern because comparison of cells derived from males and post-menopausal women showed no intrinsic differences in glucose metabolic pathways [24].
Muscle biopsy
Experiments were performed with tissue obtained from a thigh muscle (vastus lateralis) biopsy in rested conditions. After injection of a local anaesthetic (1% Xylocaine) into the skin and fascia, a small incision was made in the middle third of the vastus lateralis muscle of each subject and a muscle sample taken using a Bergstrom biopsy needle modified to include suction. An experienced medical practitioner took all biopsies at approximately constant depth and the second biopsy was taken approximately 1–2-cm proximal to the previous sampling site. Muscle biopsies were collected at rest (CON) before (Pre T2D) and 60 min after commencement of the 40 mU/m2/min hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (Post T2D) that raised plasma insulin levels to 58 ± 9 µU/ml (Mean ± SD) [22]. Excised samples of ~ 100–200 mg were blotted on filter paper to remove excess blood and a portion (~ 5–10 mg) placed in paraffin oil (Ajax Chemical, Sydney, Australia) for fibre dissection.
Fibre segment preparation
The muscle biopsy was pinned at resting length in a Petri dish on a Sylgaard layer under paraffin oil. Individual fibre segments were dissected from the biopsy under a microscope at room temperature (RT), typically 2–3 mm in length which is equivalent to ~ 10–15 µg wet weight muscle [16, 25, 26]. The same experimenters collected fibres from all biopsies. To determine protein abundance in a given fibre type, isolated muscle fibre segments were individually placed into 1 × SDS loading buffer, consisting of 10 µl physiological buffer (PB) (in mM; 129 K+, 1 free MG2+ (10.3 total Mg2+), 90 HEPES, 50 EGTA, * ATP, 10 CP, pH 7.10 and an osmolality of 295 ± 10 mosmol/kg H2O) and 5 µl 3 × SDS loading buffer (0.125 M TrisHCl pH6.8, 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, 4 M urea, 10% mercaptoethanol and 0.001% bromophenol blue). The proportion of a protein in the cytosol was assessed using our protein diffusibility assay, using mechanically-skinned fibres by rolling back the surface membrane (sarcolemma) using fine forceps, as described previously [16, 26]. Briefly, skinned fibre segments were tied with silk suture and immersed into 10 µl wash PB with protease inhibitor cocktail (COMplete; Roche Diagnostics, Sydney, NSW, Australia) for 10 min allowing any freely diffusible proteins (i.e., cytoplasmic proteins) to move out of the fibre. We performed a diffusibility time course assay with 1-, 10- and 30-min timepoints for all proteins except GS, due to the inability to probe for that protein after GP as they have similar migrations on a gel and GP at 30 min. Importantly, this assay does not include any manipulation of the sample, such as via vortex or centrifugation, ensuring only the proteins with a cytosolic or loosely bound location to be identified. The fibre was then removed from the wash solution and placed into a new tube with 10 µl PB. Finally, 5 µl 3 × SDS loading buffer was added to all tubes, which were stored at − 80 °C until analysed by western blotting, where the wash and fibre were run side-by-side.
Western blotting
Whole protein muscle samples were separated on 4–15% Criterion Stain Free gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as previously described [19, 27, 28]. A mixed sample was loaded onto gels (2, 4, 8 and 16 µl) to generate calibration curves to determine detection limits for a given protein and comparison across gels. Total protein in the gel were imaged using Stain Free imager (Bio Rad). Loading amount was measured by determining the total density of all the bands in each lane. Following transfer, nitrocellulose membranes were blocked and probed with the required primary antibody constantly rocked overnight at 4 °C and 2 h at room temperature (rabbit anti-AMPKβ1/2 1:1000 Cell Signalling Cat#4150 lot 003, rabbit anti-GBE 1:5000, anti-GDE 1:1000 and anti-GP 1:1000 previously described [29], rabbit anti-GS 1:2500 Epitomics Cat#1919-1, mouse anti-MHCI 1:200 Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB) A4.840, mouse anti-MHCIIa 1:200 DSHB A4.74). Membranes were cut into sections containing proteins of a particular size to maximise the number of proteins that could be detected with first probe of the membrane. Following washes and probes with secondary antibodies (goat anti-mouse IgG-horse radish peroxidase (HRP) Pierce 31430 and goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP Pierce 31460, both diluted 1:60,000) chemiluminescent images were captured and densitometry was performed (Chemidoc MP and ImageLab software, version 6, Bio-Rad). Images of the molecular weight markers on the membrane were captured under white light prior to chemiluminescent imaging without moving the membrane.
Dot blotting for glycogen analysis
Fibres were firstly examined for fibre type by dot blotting as previously described [30]. Succeeding this, fibres and washes were pooled according to their MHC for each individual and treatment. Pooled washes and matched fibres were loaded in triplicate and dot blotted for Glycogen (gift from Otto Baba, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan) along with a standard curve of a muscle homogenate with a known glycogen content [21]. Chemiluminescent images were collected, and densitometry performed using Chemidoc MP and ImageLab software.
Statistical analyses
Results are presented as mean values + standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. Protein data were analysed using a two-way, within subject ANOVA, with subject (CON and T2D) and fibre type (Type I and Type II) post-hoc testing (Dunnet’s or Tukey) performed when statistically significant interactions were detected with ANOVA. The P values are indicated, and significance was set at P < 0.05. Fibre type data were tested using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-hoc analysis. Repeated measures were determined not to be significant using linear mixed model analysis of estimation of covariance parameters for all data sets. This test justifies and increases the power of the data set by permitting the use of fibres as individual data points rather than using the average of all fibres collected for that participant. The amount of a given protein in muscle homogenates was expressed relative to total protein (from density of all bands in that lane of the StainFree gel). For a given treatment and to allow comparison across gels, values were expressed relative to the average of the Type I fibres on the given gel. In addition, the amount of protein in washes obtained from single fibres was expressed as percentage of total pool (wash and fibre) of the protein of interest. The amount of glycogen was determined from the sum of wash and fibre compared to a calibration curve of known glycogen amount. Glycogen data were analysed using univariant ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc tests. Time course analyses were analysed using one-way ANOVA within population with Bonferroni post hoc tests. Analyses used Prism version 7.0 (GraphPad) or SPSS Statistics 24.
Results
Fibre type composition
MHCI and IIa fibres constituted ~ 60% and 36%, respectively, in CON and 41% and 49%, respectively, in T2D, with non-specified fibres amounting to 4% and 10%, respectively, in CON and T2D (see below). The relative proportion of Type I muscle fibres was lower and Type II muscle fibres higher, in T2D compared with CON (Fig. 1, P = 0.005 and P = 0.03, respectively, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test). Fibres expressing both MHCI and IIa, those that did not stain with MHCIIa antibody and those that were MHCIIx positive (129 fibres in total probed with MHCIIx) were pooled as non-specified fibres types (Fig. 1). There were 76 fibres excluded from further analyses, 23 fibres from CON and 53 fibres from T2D.
Abundance and fibre-type specificity of glycogen-related proteins and AMPKβ2 in muscle fibres from control and type 2 diabetes individuals
GP was higher in Type II compared with Type I fibres in CON (F1,6 = 12.5, P = 0.001 univariant, P = 0.04 Tukey’s post hoc), but there were no fibre type differences detected in T2D muscle, either before or after the clamp (Fig. 2A, B). Compared with fibres obtained from CON, there was higher GP abundance in both Type I (P = 0.02) and Type II (P = 0.01) fibres in muscle from T2D. There was no difference in GP in either Type I or Type II fibres obtained before and after the clamp compared to pre (Fig. 2A, B). Whilst no fibre type differences were revealed in GDE from CON or T2D, there was increased GDE following the clamp in Type II fibres in T2D (F1,6 = 5, P = 0.001 univariant, P = 0.006 Tukey’s post hoc) (Fig. 2C, D). GS had no fibre type differences in muscle from CON or T2D, no differences between before or after the clamp, or compared with CON (Fig. 2E, F). Whilst no fibre type differences were revealed in GBE from CON, there was a lower GBE abundance in Type II compared with Type I fibres in T2D (F1,6 = 3.75, P = 0.06 univariant, P = 0.04 Tukey’s post hoc), and following the clamp, GBE was increased in Type II fibres, with no effect detected in Type I fibres (P = 0.05 Tukey’s post hoc) (Fig. 2G, H). AMPK-β2 was higher in Type II from CON compared with T2D (F1,6 = 2.13, P = 0.06 univariant, P = 0.04 Tukey’s post hoc), with no fibre type differences detected in CON, and no effect of the clamp in T2D for a given fibre type (Fig. 2I, J).
Protein movement and localisation in human single fibres from control and T2D individuals
Muscle fibres were dissected from freshly obtained muscle biopsies from CON and T2D and the proportion of a protein in the cytosol following 1-, 10- and 30-min washes measured by Western blotting, where wash and fibre pairs were analysed side by side. To examine the diffusion time course, Type I and Type II fibres were pooled (except for GDE). In CON, the appearance of a protein was not different between 1- and 10-min washes, with more appearing in the wash at 30-min, compared with 10-min, for AMPK (Fig. 3). In T2D, comparing 1- and 10-min washes, there was more AMPK and GP in the 10-min wash with the appearance of a protein not different between 10- and 30-min washes (Fig. 3). Comparing fibre types across CON and T2D, apart from GDE in Type I fibres, there was a greater abundance of glycogen-related proteins located in the cytosol in fibres from T2D compared to CON individuals, in both Type I and Type II fibres (Fig. 4, Table 1). The hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp made no significant difference to the diffusible portion of the fibres for any of the glycogen-related proteins. The diffusibility of AMPK-β2 was not influenced by type 2 diabetes or the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp (Fig. 4 and Table 1).
Glycogen amount and diffusibility in single fibres from control and T2D individuals.
In the basal (non-insulin stimulated) state, there was more glycogen in Type II compared with Type I fibres in CON (P = 0.05) and T2D (P < 0.01, Fig. 5A). There was no difference in the abundance of glycogen between either Type I or Type II fibres in CON and T2D. Following the insulin clamp there was no difference in the abundance of glycogen between Type I and Type II fibres, although the high insulin insult during the clamp resulted in a significant increase in the amount of glycogen in Type I fibres compared with Type I fibres before the clamp (P < 0.001). The glycogen diffusibility method was validated with the observation of the cytosolic enzyme aldolase appropriately localised in the diffusible pool and both the myofibrillar proteins actin and the fibre specific MHC I and MHC II proteins in the fibre pool, as seen in Fig. 5B. To identify the proportion glycogen in each pool the amount of glycogen in the diffusible (wash) pool was expressed as a percentage of the total (i.e., glycogen in wash and fibre, Fig. 5C). The majority of glycogen was diffusible in all fibres. It was 70% and 65% for Type I and Type II fibres, respectively in CON, and 53% and 60% for Type I and Type II fibres, respectively, in T2D. A smaller subset of fibres were assessed for glycogen diffusibility with 1- and 30-min washes, which were not different from the 10-min washes within either T2D or CON (Fig. 3). This was different in Type I fibres from T2D compared with CON (P < 0.005). The amount of diffusible glycogen was not altered after insulin clamp (results not shown).
Discussion
The major findings of this paper are that the majority of glycogen is cytosolic and that the distribution of glycogen-related proteins in the cytosol was greater in T2D compared with CON. Given that type 2 diabetes manifests because of poor glucose regulation and that fibre type distribution is altered in T2D, we addressed important fibre specific differences in skeletal muscle glycogen and related proteins. A lower proportion of Type I fibres in T2D than CON (Fig. 1; [9, 31]) may explain reported alterations in metabolic capacity in type 2 diabetes individuals [32]. The differential distributions of key glycogen-related proteins between Type I and Type II (constituting a mixture of fibres expressing MHC IIa and MHCIIa/IIx, but not pure MHCIIx) muscle fibres observed in CON was not reflected in T2D, identifying a potential point of dysregulation.
Glycogen was higher in Type II compared with Type I muscle fibres in both CON and T2D, in concordance with previous fibre-specific comparisons [9]. This is despite glucose being locked inside a muscle cell through the action of intracellular hexokinase, which is ~ 4–fivefold higher in Type I compared with Type II fibres from both healthy and type 2 diabetes individuals [9]. This suggests that hexokinase does not directly influence glycogen content, but rather presents a higher glucose handling ability in oxidative fibres during periods of high circulating glucose. There was no difference in the glycogen content between Type I or Type II fibres in CON and T2D, similar to a comparison of glycogen in whole muscle [33]. This does not support the suggestion that there is a reduced glycogen storage capacity in type 2 diabetes due to a stronger feedback inhibition of glycogen synthase [34]. Our findings show similar skeletal muscle glycogen content between healthy individuals and those with type 2 diabetes despite the difference in basal blood glucose levels. This likely also reflects the fibre type shift seen in muscle from type 2 diabetes, which we and others have shown [9]. After the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp in T2D, glycogen content increased in Type I but not Type II fibres, although there was no difference in the abundance of GS protein, like others who reported no change in the various phosphorylation states of GS [9]. Whilst increased glycogen content has been positively correlated with GS activity [35,36,37], these data suggest the presence of additional regulatory mechanisms. To address this, we investigated the abundance of the various glycogen-related proteins and their intracellular location before and after a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp.
The greater abundance of the glycogen catabolic enzyme, GP, in Type II compared with Type I fibres from our CON was similar to that reported for young, healthy humans [38] as well as GP activity [39]. GP was ~ threefold greater in both Type I and Type II in T2D compared with CON (Fig. 2B), indicative of an enhanced capacity for cleavage of alpha-1,4-linkages of glycogen. GDE, which is necessary for cleavage of alpha-1,6-linkages breakdown, may be rate limiting as there was no concomitant difference in its abundance. Some of this was seemingly compensated for following the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp, when the abundance of GDE increased ~ 1.4–1.8-fold in both fibre types in T2D. This may be due to an effect of the higher circulating insulin on the protein stability, i.e., altered protein degradation or increased half-life of GDE. This is plausible given that in isolated rat diaphragm, insulin stimulated protein synthesis and inhibited protein degradation, albeit with supraphysiological insulin levels [40]. Nevertheless, the increased GDE abundance suggests that glycogen was more accessible as a fuel source under this heightened insulinaemic and normal blood glucose environment.
After initiation, the synthesis of glycogen granules relies on the actions of GBE and GS. Overall, there was little difference in the abundance of these proteins when comparing either fibre type or CON vs T2D. There was, however, about half as much GBE in Type II compared to Type I muscle fibres in T2D which was not evident in CON (Fig. 4D). An implication of having reduced GBE in Type II fibres may be a reduced ability for the glycogen granules to be assembled which may contribute somehow to impaired glucose regulation. This is in part supported by the observations following the normalisation of blood glucose with the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp, where there was an increase in GBE in Type II fibres, suggesting either an increase in synthesis or decrease in degradation of that protein. Albers and colleagues also reported no fibre type difference in these proteins in muscle from type 2 diabetes individuals, however, they reported GS higher in Type I compared with Type II fibres from control individuals [9]. It is unclear why this discrepancy presented, however, it should be noted that changes in the protein alone are insufficient to identify functionally relevant findings. This is particularly relevant for GS, whose activity is highly regulated via one of its nine phosphorylation sites or independently of phosphorylation via allosteric regulation activated by glucose-6-phosphate.
The major AMPK β-isoform in human skeletal muscle, AMPK-β2, showed no fibre type differences (Fig. 2J). Supporting our findings, in young healthy individuals others have found no fibre type difference in AMPK-β2, although there was a greater abundance of AMPK-β1 in Type I compared with Type II fibres [41]. Previous human studies have investigated AMPK-β1/β2 amounts in muscle homogenates collected from type 2 diabetes and control individuals and found no difference in either AMPK-β1 [42] or AMPK-β2 [20, 43]. Nevertheless, in our study Type II fibres from T2D had less AMPK-β2 than those from CON suggesting that the dysregulation in glucose uptake that occurs in type 2 diabetes may be in part due to AMPK abundance and potential activity in a fibre specific manner. Given the shift to an increased proportion of Type II fibres in T2D compared with CON (Fig. 1) and that AMPK-β2 is more abundant in those Type II fibres from CON individuals, it is perhaps not surprising that muscle homogenates are unable to identify differences in AMPK-β2 between control and type 2 diabetes individuals. AMPK-β has been shown to be associated with a number of key mechanisms of glucose regulation, including the activation of GS activity [44], GLUT4 translocation [45, 46] and the regulation of lipid oxidation through targeting acetyl-CoA carboxylase activity (ACC) [47]. This means that any reduction in the expression of AMPK-β2 in Type II fibres in type 2 diabetes would likely reflect a decreased glucose handling capability in skeletal muscle.
Diffusibility
The various glycogen-related proteins had a strikingly higher cytosolic or loosely bound abundance in both Type I and II fibres in T2D compared with CON. The ramification of this could be dysregulation of the glycogen granule due to altered protein–protein interactions changing the rate of glycogen granule formation and breakdown. This would alter the availability of readily accessible energy with implications for glycogen use in muscle of type 2 diabetes individuals. Interestingly, there was no such differential between CON and T2D fibres in the predominant cytoplasmic localisation of AMPK-β2. We have previously demonstrated that in rat skeletal muscle AMPK-β2 was not associated with the glycogen granule, despite the carbohydrate binding motif [21]. This is likely also the situation in human skeletal muscle suggesting that the 25% AMPK-β2 that is bound in fibres is localised to regions other than glycogen and is likely unrelated to glycogen regulation.
Glycogen
A major finding of this study is the first evidence we provide for a considerable pool of diffusible glycogen, indicating a novel cytosolic or loosely bound pool in human skeletal muscle. This large pool amounted to 47–52% and 50–70% of the total glycogen in muscle after 1- and 10-min washes, respectively. This is perhaps surprising based on electron microscopy images that show glycogen granules tightly embedded within/between various cellular structures [48]. Our findings are validated by the presence and absence of cytosolic (aldolase) and cytoskeletal (actin) control proteins in the expected locations. Further, glycogen granules are ~ 25 nm in diameter on average (range 10–44 nm) [49] being much larger than proteins, where a 50 kDa protein is predicted to be ~ 2.4 nm. Appearance of glycogen in the 1-min wash confirms a cytosolic location, similar to that shown for proteins such as heat shock proteins [25] and calpains [26]. Importantly, the robustness of this technique is demonstrated where the cytosolic localisation of AMPKβ2 was altered following in situ muscle stimulation of rat muscle [21]. The proportion of diffusible glycogen in Type I fibres was less in T2D compared with CON (Fig. 5C). Using a similar approach to that used here, > 75% of total glycogen was reported to be diffusible in toad muscle [50]. Whilst distinct pools of glycogen have been identified using isolated human single skeletal muscle fibre segments, with most glycogen within the intermyofibrillar followed by intramyofibrillar and subsarcolemmal spaces [48], our findings add a new pool that amounts to over half the total glycogen, and highlight an important limitation when interpreting electron microscopy studies. The reason for this is likely because sample preparation for electron microscopy requires washing and fixation steps that would either wash away this newly identified diffusible pool or render it an artificial location in the muscle fibre following fixation steps. Others have reported two distinct fractions of glycogen according to their solubility by either acid hydrolysis or enzymatic hydrolysis [51, 52], however, it is unlikely one of these represents the cytosolic pool of glycogen isolated here using physiologically relevant conditions. Finally, we considered if differing glycogen granule sizes, which can be 10–56 nm [53, 54], could be a determinant of cytosolic location, although considered this unlikely because glycogen granule size has been shown to be normally distributed between 10 and 44 nm with no distinctive pools detected [53]. This poses a limitation of our study in that we were not able to investigate the size of the glycogen granules within the diffusible subcellular pool, as to do so requires electron microscopy steps, which means that even if the granules could be captured in the muscle fibres, the diffusible glycogen could not be distinguished from other glycogen granules.
Conclusions
We show the potential to anabolise glycogen granules depends on whether Type I or Type II fibres are examined, and this proportion is different in the muscle from people with type 2 diabetes. Interestingly, AMPK-β2 showed little differences in the muscles and fibre types examined, and it is warranted to examine fibre type-specific AMPK activity in muscle from healthy control and type 2 diabetes individuals to ascertain whether AMPK can play a major role in glycogen regulation. Protein function is dependent on location within a cell, and we have shown that proteins vital for glycogen regulation, either through synthesis or degradation, are differentially localised to the cytosol in muscle from control and type 2 diabetes individuals. We have derived a model from our findings, shown in Fig. 6, depicting the difference in relative abundance of cytosolic or loosely bound proteins in muscle from control individuals and type 2 diabetes patients. Further exploration is required to ascertain if they occur in the pre-diabetic stage, or after type 2 diabetes is present, and thereby reveal potential mechanisms for targeting in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Stanford KI, Goodyear LJ (2014) Exercise and type 2 diabetes: molecular mechanisms regulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. Adv Physiol Educ 38:308–314. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00080.2014
Bottinelli R, Reggiani C (2000) Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 73:195–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6107(00)00006-7
James DE, Jenkins AB, Kraegen EW (1985) Heterogeneity of insulin action in individual muscles in vivo: euglycemic clamp studies in rats. Am J Physiol 248:E567–E574. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1985.248.5.E567
Marette A, Richardson JM, Ramlal T, Balon TW, Vranic M, Pessin JE, Klip A (1992) Abundance, localization, and insulin-induced translocation of glucose transporters in red and white muscle. Am J Physiol 263:C443–C452. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1992.263.2.C443
Mackrell JG, Cartee GD (2012) A novel method to measure glucose uptake and myosin heavy chain isoform expression of single fibers from rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 61:995–1003. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-1299
Zierath JR, He L, Guma A, Odegoard Wahlstrom E, Klip A, Wallberg-Henriksson H (1996) Insulin action on glucose transport and plasma membrane GLUT4 content in skeletal muscle from patients with NIDDM. Diabetologia 39:1180–1189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02658504
Stuart CA, McCurry MP, Marino A, South MA, Howell ME, Layne AS, Ramsey MW, Stone MH (2013) Slow-twitch fiber proportion in skeletal muscle correlates with insulin responsiveness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:2027–2036. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3876
Oberbach A, Bossenz Y, Lehmann S, Niebauer J, Adams V, Paschke R, Schon MR, Bluher M, Punkt K (2006) Altered fiber distribution and fiber-specific glycolytic and oxidative enzyme activity in skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 29:895–900
Albers PH, Pedersen AJ, Birk JB, Kristensen DE, Vind BF, Baba O, Nohr J, Hojlund K, Wojtaszewski JF (2015) Human muscle fiber type-specific insulin signaling: impact of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 64:485–497. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0590
Marin P, Andersson B, Krotkiewski M, Bjorntorp P (1994) Muscle fiber composition and capillary density in women and men with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 17:382–386
Gaster M, Staehr P, Beck-Nielsen H, Schroder HD, Handberg A (2001) GLUT4 is reduced in slow muscle fibers of type 2 diabetic patients: is insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes a slow, type 1 fiber disease? Diabetes 50:1324–1329
He J, Watkins S, Kelley DE (2001) Skeletal muscle lipid content and oxidative enzyme activity in relation to muscle fiber type in type 2 diabetes and obesity. Diabetes 50:817–823
Caudwell FB, Cohen P (1980) Purification and subunit structure of glycogen-branching enzyme from rabbit skeletal muscle. Eur J Biochem 109:391–394
Frosig C, Richter EA (2009) Improved insulin sensitivity after exercise: focus on insulin signaling. Obesity 17(Suppl 3):S15-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.383
Xu H, Stapleton D, Murphy RM (2015) Rat skeletal muscle glycogen degradation pathways reveal differential association of glycogen-related proteins with glycogen granules. J Physiol Biochem 71:267–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-015-0407-y
Murphy RM, Xu H, Latchman H, Larkins NT, Gooley PR, Stapleton DI (2012) Single fiber analyses of glycogen-related proteins reveal their differential association with glycogen in rat skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 303:C1146–C1155. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00252.2012
Deshmukh AS, Steenberg DE, Hostrup M, Birk JB, Larsen JK, Santos A, Kjobsted R, Hingst JR, Scheele CC, Murgia M, Kiens B, Richter EA, Mann M, Wojtaszewski JFP (2021) Deep muscle-proteomic analysis of freeze-dried human muscle biopsies reveals fiber type-specific adaptations to exercise training. Nat Commun 12:304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20556-8
Takaguri A, Inoue S, Kubo T, Satoh K (2016) AMPK activation by prolonged stimulation with interleukin-1beta contributes to the promotion of GLUT4 translocation in skeletal muscle cells. Cell Biol Int 40:1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.10673
Murphy RM (2011) Enhanced technique to measure proteins in single segments of human skeletal muscle fibers: fiber-type dependence of AMPK-alpha1 and -beta1. J Appl Physiol (1985) 110:820–825. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01082.2010
Hojlund K, Mustard KJ, Staehr P, Hardie DG, Beck-Nielsen H, Richter EA, Wojtaszewski JF (2004) AMPK activity and isoform protein expression are similar in muscle of obese subjects with and without type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286:E239–E244. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00326.2003
Xu H, Frankenberg NT, Lamb GD, Gooley PR, Stapleton DI, Murphy RM (2016) When phosphorylated at Thr148, the beta2-subunit of AMP-activated kinase does not associate with glycogen in skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 311:C35-42. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00047.2016
Mason SA, Della Gatta PA, Snow RJ, Russell AP, Wadley GD (2016) Ascorbic acid supplementation improves skeletal muscle oxidative stress and insulin sensitivity in people with type 2 diabetes: findings of a randomized controlled study. Free Radic Biol Med 93:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2016.01.006
Lamboley CR, Wyckelsma VL, Dutka TL, McKenna MJ, Murphy RM, Lamb GD (2015) Contractile properties and sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium content in type I and type II skeletal muscle fibres in active aged humans. J Physiol 593:2499–2514. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270179
Rune A, Salehzadeh F, Szekeres F, Kuhn I, Osler ME, Al-Khalili L (2009) Evidence against a sexual dimorphism in glucose and fatty acid metabolism in skeletal muscle cultures from age-matched men and post-menopausal women. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 197:207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02010.x
Larkins NT, Murphy RM, Lamb GD (2012) Absolute amounts and diffusibility of HSP72, HSP25, and alphaB-crystallin in fast- and slow-twitch skeletal muscle fibers of rat. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 302:C228–C239. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00266.2011
Murphy RM, Verburg E, Lamb GD (2006) Ca2+ activation of diffusible and bound pools of mu-calpain in rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 576:595–612. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.114090
Mollica JP, Oakhill JS, Lamb GD, Murphy RM (2009) Are genuine changes in protein expression being overlooked? Reassessing Western blotting. Anal Biochem 386:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2008.12.029
Frankenberg NT, Lamb GD, Overgaard K, Murphy RM, Vissing K (2014) Small heat shock proteins translocate to the cytoskeleton in human skeletal muscle following eccentric exercise independently of phosphorylation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 116:1463–1472. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01026.2013
Ryu JH, Drain J, Kim JH, McGee S, Gray-Weale A, Waddington L, Parker GJ, Hargreaves M, Yoo SH, Stapleton D (2009) Comparative structural analyses of purified glycogen particles from rat liver, human skeletal muscle and commercial preparations. Int J Biol Macromol 45:478–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2009.08.006
Christiansen D, MacInnis MJ, Zacharewicz E, Xu H, Frankish BP, Murphy RM (2019) A fast, reliable and sample-sparing method to identify fibre types of single muscle fibres. Sci Rep 9:6473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42168-z
Daugaard JR, Nielsen JN, Kristiansen S, Andersen JL, Hargreaves M, Richter EA (2000) Fiber type-specific expression of GLUT4 in human skeletal muscle: influence of exercise training. Diabetes 49:1092–1095
Hickey MS, Carey JO, Azevedo JL, Houmard JA, Pories WJ, Israel RG, Dohm GL (1995) Skeletal muscle fiber composition is related to adiposity and in vitro glucose transport rate in humans. Am J Physiol 268:E453–E457
Shulman GI, Rothman DL, Jue T, Stein P, DeFronzo RA, Shulman RG (1990) Quantitation of muscle glycogen synthesis in normal subjects and subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. N Engl J Med 322:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199001253220403
Jensen J, Rustad PI, Kolnes AJ, Lai YC (2011) The role of skeletal muscle glycogen breakdown for regulation of insulin sensitivity by exercise. Front Physiol 2:112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2011.00112
Laurent D, Hundal RS, Dresner A, Price TB, Vogel SM, Petersen KF, Shulman GI (2000) Mechanism of muscle glycogen autoregulation in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278:E663–E668. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.4.E663
Wojtaszewski JF, Hansen BF, Gade KB, Markuns JF, Goodyear LJ, Richter EA (2000) Insulin signaling and insulin sensitivity after exercise in human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 49:325–331. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.49.3.325
Dela F, Ingersen A, Andersen NB, Nielsen MB, Petersen HHH, Hansen CN, Larsen S, Wojtaszewski J, Helge JW (2019) Effects of one-legged high-intensity interval training on insulin-mediated skeletal muscle glucose homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 226:e13245. https://doi.org/10.1111/apha.13245
Daugaard JR, Richter EA (2004) Muscle- and fibre type-specific expression of glucose transporter 4, glycogen synthase and glycogen phosphorylase proteins in human skeletal muscle. Pflugers Arch 447:452–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-003-1195-8
Tallon MJ, Harris RC, Maffulli N, Tarnopolsky MA (2007) Carnosine, taurine and enzyme activities of human skeletal muscle fibres from elderly subjects with osteoarthritis and young moderately active subjects. Biogerontology 8:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-006-9038-6
Fulks RM, Li JB, Goldberg AL (1975) Effects of insulin, glucose, and amino acids on protein turnover in rat diaphragm. J Biol Chem 250:290–298
Kristensen DE, Albers PH, Prats C, Baba O, Birk JB, Wojtaszewski JF (2015) Human muscle fibre type-specific regulation of AMPK and downstream targets by exercise. J Physiol 593:2053–2069. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2014.283267
Musi N, Fujii N, Hirshman MF, Ekberg I, Froberg S, Ljungqvist O, Thorell A, Goodyear LJ (2001) AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is activated in muscle of subjects with type 2 diabetes during exercise. Diabetes 50:921–927
Wojtaszewski JF, Birk JB, Frosig C, Holten M, Pilegaard H, Dela F (2005) 5’AMP activated protein kinase expression in human skeletal muscle: effects of strength training and type 2 diabetes. J Physiol 564:563–573. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.082669
Jorgensen SB, Nielsen JN, Birk JB, Olsen GS, Viollet B, Andreelli F, Schjerling P, Vaulont S, Hardie DG, Hansen BF, Richter EA, Wojtaszewski JF (2004) The alpha2–5’AMP-activated protein kinase is a site 2 glycogen synthase kinase in skeletal muscle and is responsive to glucose loading. Diabetes 53:3074–3081
Treebak JT, Pehmoller C, Kristensen JM, Kjobsted R, Birk JB, Schjerling P, Richter EA, Goodyear LJ, Wojtaszewski JF (2014) Acute exercise and physiological insulin induce distinct phosphorylation signatures on TBC1D1 and TBC1D4 proteins in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 592:351–375. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2013.266338
Jessen N, An D, Lihn AS, Nygren J, Hirshman MF, Thorell A, Goodyear LJ (2011) Exercise increases TBC1D1 phosphorylation in human skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 301:E164–E171. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00042.2011
Hardie DG, Hawley SA (2001) AMP-activated protein kinase: the energy charge hypothesis revisited. BioEssays 23:1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10009
Nielsen J, Holmberg HC, Schroder HD, Saltin B, Ortenblad N (2011) Human skeletal muscle glycogen utilization in exhaustive exercise: role of subcellular localization and fibre type. J Physiol 589:2871–2885. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.204487
Prats C, Graham TE, Shearer J (2018) The dynamic life of the glycogen granule. J Biol Chem 293:7089–7098. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R117.802843
Stephenson DG, Nguyen LT, Stephenson GM (1999) Glycogen content and excitation-contraction coupling in mechanically skinned muscle fibres of the cane toad. J Physiol 519(Pt 1):177–187
Rosati G (1967) Enzyme treatment of glycogen particles in rat liver and muscle. J Ultrastruct Res 18:444–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5320(67)80129-1
Adamo KB, Graham TE (1998) Comparison of traditional measurements with macroglycogen and proglycogen analysis of muscle glycogen. J Appl Physiol (1985) 84:908–913. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.84.3.908
Marchand I, Chorneyko K, Tarnopolsky M, Hamilton S, Shearer J, Potvin J, Graham TE (2002) Quantification of subcellular glycogen in resting human muscle: granule size, number, and location. J Appl Physiol (1985) 93:1598–1607. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00585.2001
Friden J, Seger J, Ekblom B (1989) Topographical localization of muscle glycogen: an ultrahistochemical study in the human vastus lateralis. Acta Physiol Scand 135:381–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08591.x
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Michael McKenna and Dr. Victoria Wyckelsma (Victoria University, Melbourne) for human samples. The monoclonal antibodies directed against adult human MHC isoforms (A4.84 and A4.74) used in the present study were developed by Dr. Blau. All were obtained from the Development Studies Hybridoma Bank, under the auspices of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and maintained by the University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA 52242.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This project received funding from the Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Research Focus Area of La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NTF and RMM conceived the biochemical studies, performed the experiments, data analysis, data representation; and wrote the manuscript; NTF performed the statistics; SAM and GDW performed the Deakin University human trials, including the subject recruitment and hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamps. All authors revised and approved final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there are no competing interests, financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Frankenberg, N.T., Mason, S.A., Wadley, G.D. et al. Skeletal muscle cell-specific differences in type 2 diabetes. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 79, 256 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04265-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04265-7