Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have improved cancer immunotherapy in recent years. Immune cells, such as Natural killer cells (NK-cells) or T cells, are used as effector cells in CAR-therapy. NK92-cells, a cell line with known cytotoxic activity, are of particular interest in CAR-therapy since culturing conditions are simple and anti-tumor efficacy combined with a manageable safety profile was proven in clinical trials. The major pathways of immune effector cells, including NK92-cells, to mediate cytotoxicity, are the perforin/granzyme and the death-receptor pathway. Detailed knowledge of CAR-effector cells’ cytotoxic mechanisms is essential to unravel resistance mechanisms, which potentially arise by resistance against apoptosis-inducing signaling. Since mutations in apoptosis pathways are frequent in lymphoma, the impact on CAR-mediated cytotoxicity is of clinical interest. In this study, knockout models of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells were designed, to investigate cytotoxic pathways in vitro. Knockout of perforin 1 (Prf1) and subsequent abrogation of the perforin/granzyme pathway dramatically reduced the cytotoxicity of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells. In contrast, knockout of FasL and inhibition of TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligands) did not impair cytotoxicity in most conditions. In conclusion, these results indicate the perforin/granzyme pathway as the major pathway to mediate cytotoxicity in CD19-CAR-NK92 cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cancer immunotherapy has become an important tool for cancer treatment in recent years. By the introduction of chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), stably transduced into immune effector cells, gene therapy and cancer immunotherapy have been successfully combined. The first studies of immune effector cells and CARs focused on T cells, genetically altered by lentiviral or retroviral gene transfers, targeting cancer cells [1, 2]. Pursuing this approach, different CAR-T cell products are in clinical use [3,4,5,6].
Despite remarkable response rates in heavily pretreated patients, different factors limit the utility of CAR immunotherapy. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) are potentially life-threating adverse events of CAR-T cell therapy [7]. The risk of HLA-mediated graft-versus-host (GvH) reactivity restricts CAR-T cell therapy mainly to autologous use. Preceding chemotherapy, T cell exhaustion and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment are host factors, further restraining CAR-T cell therapy [8,9,10]. Thus, further improvement in CAR-based immunotherapy is required.
NK-cells represent a potent alternative as CAR-effector cells, overcoming important disadvantages of T cells [11, 12]. NK-cells can be used as an allogeneic off-the-shelf product, because full HLA matching is unnecessary. A favorable cytokine/chemokine profile appears to be accompanied by a lower risk of CRS and ICANS [11, 13]. NK-cells can be conveniently isolated from peripheral blood and umbilical cord blood of human donors. In an early clinical trial, allogeneic CAR-NK cells obtained from umbilical cord blood have shown high efficacy and a remarkable safety profile [14]. In addition, irradiated cell lines such as NK92-cells can be applied safely [11, 12, 14, 15]. The NK92 cell line is of particular interest, since culturing conditions are simple and preclinical as well as clinical trials proved their cytotoxic activity [16,17,18].
Cytotoxicity of NK-cells is mainly mediated via degranulation of perforin and granzymes and by expression of death-ligands (FasL and TRAIL) [19]. Binding to their corresponding receptor on the target cell, these ligands induce apoptosis by activating the death-receptor pathway [19, 20]. Despite these effective mechanisms, CAR-therapy may be unsuccessful, because of target cells’ resistance towards either pathway [21].
Downstream signaling after CAR activation and subsequent cytotoxic action is under current investigation and partly unknown [22,23,24]. Understanding the cytotoxic mechanisms of CAR-effector cells is essential to unravel and may overcome resistance of target cells. It is unclear if the perforin/granzyme pathway and the death ligand pathways can be substituted by each other, or if the loss of one pathway, for example by acquired resistance mechanisms in the target cells, leads to a substantial decrease in cytotoxic activity in CAR-NK92 cells.
In this study, we performed in vitro experiments with different CD19-CAR-NK92 knockout (ko) models to provide further insight into cytotoxic pathways of these cells.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and human primary cells
NK92-cells were used as CAR-effector cells. Daudi and Karpas422 cells (CD19+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines), human primary B cells and Jurkat cells (CD19−) served as target cells. All cell lines were authenticated by STR analysis.
NK92-cells were cultured in RPMI1640 (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS (GIBCO), 4 mM L-glutamine (GIBCO), 100 U/ml/100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich) and 100 U/ml recombinant human Interleukin (IL)-2 (Novartis). Other cell lines were cultured in RPMI1640, containing 2 mM L-glutamine and 50 U/ml/50 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin supplemented with 20% FBS for Karpas422, 10% FBS for Jurkat or 10% FBS, 1 mM sodium pyruvate (GIBCO) and 10 mM HEPES for Daudi.
Collection and culture of primary B cells
The ethical committee of the Ruhr-University Bochum approved the collection and experimental use of human blood samples (No. 18-6462). All donors gave their informed consent and participated voluntarily. First, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by density gradient centrifugation, as previously described [8].
The isolation of primary B cells from human PBMCs was performed using the Pan B cell Isolation Kit (human), MidiMACS™ Separator and LS Columns (all Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified cell suspension was centrifugated at 400 × g for 5 min and cultured in B cell growth medium (RPMI 1640) supplemented with 10% FBS, 4 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml/100 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 200 U/ml IL-2, 10 ng/ml IL-4 and 10 ng/ml BAFF (both Peprotech). B cells were cultured for 24 to 48 h until application in further experiments.
Gene editing of effector and target cells
Different CD19-CAR-NK92 knockout models were designed using a CRISPR-Cas9 system. The target-cell lines (Daudi, Karpas422, and Jurkat) were designed as green fluorescent protein (GFP) expressing cells, as described below. The plasmids used comprised antibiotic selectable markers and were designed according to following strategy: Plasmids were digested with appropriate restriction enzymes (all NewEngland Biolabs). The intentional DNA-fragments were separated by gel-electrophoresis and extracted using the FastGene Gel/PCR Extraction kit (Nippon Genetics). The required inserts and vectors were ligated by T4-DNA-Ligase (Invitrogen).
4-1BB anti-CD19 CAR construct
We used a second-generation anti-CD19 CAR, harboring the FMC63 antigen binding domain and a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain (plasmid pJ2459_19shBB, a kind gift of Michael Hudecek, University of Würzburg, Germany) [25, 26]. The CAR-sequence was cloned into the pLJM1-eGFP-Puro (#19319, Addgene) instead of the eGFP gene (restriction-enzymes: NheI (5’-end) and EcoRI (3’-end)).
Lentiguide-sgRNA-Prf1-ko-Neo, lentiguide-sgRNA-FasL-ko-Neo, and empty vector
GuideRNA-coding vectors harbored the specific sequences for Prf1-ko (Prf1-ko: sense 5’-CACCGGAGGAGCAGACGGGCTGCC-3’) and FasL-ko (FasL-ko: sense 5’-CACCGGTAATTGAAGGGCTGCTGCA-3’), respectively. Each sequence was inserted into the BsmBI-restricted lentiGuide-Puro (#52963, Addgene). The puromycin resistance gene of both resulting plasmids was replaced by the neomycin resistance gene of LentiGuide-Neo (#139449, Addgene;: XmaI (5’-end) and MluI (3’-end)). An empty LentiGuide-Neo was designed by removing the stuffer sequence from original LentiGuide-Neo (#139449, Addgene).
Lenti-eGFP-blast
The GFP-coding DNA-sequence of pLJM1-eGFP-Puro (#19319, Addgene) was PCR-amplified (Primers: sense 5’-CGCTACCGGTGCGCCGGACACGCTGAAC-3’; antisense 3’-CGCTGGATCCCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATG-5’) and cloned into lentiCas9-Blast (#52962, Addgene) instead of the Cas9-sequence [AgeI (5’-end) and BamHI (3’-end)].
Lentiviral transduction
Lentiviral vector production was carried out as previously described [8, 27]. Transduction of target lymphocytes was carried out for 24 h applying the lentiviral supernatant supplemented with 8 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich).
To enhance the transduction of NK92, Daudi, and Karpas422 cells, transduction was carried out in the presence of the TBK1/IKK inhibitor BX795 (8 µM, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 h, as previously described. [28]. Afterwards, the medium was replaced with fresh viral supernatant for continuing 19 h, supplemented only with polybrene. After transduction, the cells were washed and cultured in the cell line specific growth medium.
NK92-cells were sequentially transduced, first with the anti-CD19 CAR and then with the plasmids for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockouts. Prior to any transduction, NK92-cells were activated with 1000 U/ml IL-2 for 16 h, as previously described [28]. During transduction, the IL-2 concentration was kept at 100 U/ml. The target cells (Jurkat, Karpas422, and Daudi) were transduced with the GFP-coding lentivector.
Transduced cells’ selection was started three days after transduction and was maintained for the entire cell culture period. For NK92-cells, puromycin (Sigma-Aldrich) was used at 2 µg/ml, blasticidin (Roth) at 9 µg/ml and G418 (GIBCO) at 0.5 mg/ml. For Daudi cells, blasticidin was used at 10 µg/ml and for Karpas422 cells at 8.5 µg/ml.
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockouts and creation of NK92 cell clones
After transducing LentiCas9-Blast and following blasticidin selection, NK92 cells were transduced with either LentiGuide-sgRNA-FasL-ko-Neo (FasL-ko) or LentiGuide-sgRNA-Prf1-ko-Neo (Prf1-ko) or empty lentiGuide-Neo (reference). After subsequent neomycin selection, a proportion of NK92-FasL-ko cells were transduced with the LentiGuide-sgRNA-Prf1-ko-Neo to generate double-ko (Prf1-and FasL-ko) cell clones. The cells were kept under neomycin and blasticidin selection for at least 4 weeks before the single-cell clones were generated. For this purpose, a highly diluted cell suspension was seeded on 96-well plates with the aim of preserving 0.5–1 cell per well. Every 3–4 days fresh growth medium supplemented with IL-2 was added.
Flow cytometry
CD19-CAR expression was analyzed using the CD19 CAR Detection Reagent (human, Biotin) and anti-biotin antibody (APC, both Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer´s protocol. To evaluate target cells’ CD19, FasR, TRAIL-R1 and -R2 expression, anti-CD19 (APC-Vio 770), anti-CD95 (APC), anti-CD261 (PE) and anti-CD262 antibodies (APC) were used (all Miltenyi Biotec). Analysis was performed using FACSCantoII (BD), and data analysis was carried out with FlowJo v10.6.1.
Recombinant human FasL and cell viability assay (XTT-assay)
Target cells were incubated with recombinant human FasL (Cell Signaling Technology) in presence of 10 µg/ml anti-His antibody (R&D Systems) for 24 h. Cells were seeded on a 96-well plate in 100 µl medium at a cell count of 30,000 cells/well in case of the cell lines and 100,000 cells/well in case of primary B cells. Cell viability after treatment was assessed using the Colorimetric Cell Viability Kit III (XTT; PromoKine) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and measurement of the OD450–OD630.
Western blots
Protein extraction and western blotting was carried out as previously reported [29]. Protein amounts were 28–30 µg per lane. Each sample was measured using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For protein detection, anti-perforin, anti-FasL, anti-TRAIL, and anti-α tubulin antibodies (all Cell Signaling Technology) were used.
Cytotoxicity assays
Cytotoxicity was analyzed by flow cytometric detection of GFP+ or labeled (FITC+) target cells, as previously reported [30]. Jurkat, Karpas422, and Daudi cells were designed as GFP+ target cells, primary B cells were stained with anti-CD20 antibody (FITC, Beckman Coulter) immediately before FACS analysis. Target cells’ basal percentage of GFP+/FITC+ cells were analyzed for subsequent calculation of cell lysis. Effector (GFP−/FITC−) and target cells (GFP+ or FITC+) were incubated together for 4 h at various E:T ratios (1:4, 1:1, or 4:1) in 200 µl medium on 96-well plates. Cell count was 250.000 cells/well in all conditions. After co-incubation, the cell mixtures were analyzed regarding the respective proportion of GFP+ or FITC+ cells. To exclude cell debris and dead cells from analysis, viable cells were gated using forward and side scatter signals. Specific target-cell lysis was calculated as follows: (1-experimental GFP+/FITC+ proportion/starting GFP+/FITC+ proportion) * 100%.
Inhibition of TRAIL
Functional Grade CD253 (TRAIL) monoclonal antibody (RIK-2; eBioscience™; ThermoFischer) was used for TRAIL inhibition in cytotoxicity assays, as reported [31]. The effector cells were incubated with the anti-TRAIL antibody (1 µg in 100 µl cell suspension) for 1 h before they were mixed with target cells. During co-incubation, antibody concentration was adjusted to 5 μg/ml.
Statistical analysis and graphical display
All statistical analyses and data plots were carried out with GraphPad Prism software (version 5.03). Unless stated otherwise, data values are expressed as means of multiple determination ± standard error of mean (SEM). Significance was tested by unpaired, two-tailed t tests or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P values below 0.05 were considered to be significant and specified in gradations: ***, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.01; *, p < 0.05; ns, not significant.
Results
The 4-1BB CD19-CAR enhances cytotoxic activity
Insertion of CARs into effector cells potentially overcomes immunoescape in malignant diseases and enhances cytotoxicity [32]. To prove enhanced cytotoxicity of CD19-CAR-transduced NK92-cells versus malignant cells, the CAR-NK92 cells’ cytotoxicity was compared to wildtype NK92-cells (wtNK92). Target cells were Daudi, Karpas422 and Jurkat cell lines, as well as primary B cells from healthy donors. By FACS analysis, successful expression of the CAR was verified (Fig. 1A). Also, expression of CD19, FasR and TRAIL receptors (TRAIL-R1 and 2) were tested in the target cells. As expected, Daudi, Karpas422 and primary B cells showed high levels of CD19 (> 97%), whereas Jurkat cells were CD19-negative. (Fig. 1B). FasR and TRAIL-R1/2 were expressed by all target cells (Supp. Fig. 1). To further evaluate susceptibility or resistance towards death-receptor signaling, the target cells’ susceptibility to recombinant FasL (rFasL)-induced apoptosis was evaluated. In these experiments, Karpas422 cells were resistant, whereas apoptosis could be induced in Daudi cells and primary B cells by rFasL (Supp. Fig. 2). Lysis of CD19+ target cells was significantly enhanced by insertion of the CD19-CAR into NK92-cells (Fig. 1C). With an Effector:Target-cell (E:T) ratio of 1:1, lysis of Daudi cells increased from 21 to 96% and lysis of Karpas422 cells from 9 to 55% (both p < 0.0001). Lysis of primary B cells was 28% and 50%, respectively (p = 0.014, Fig. 1C). Jurkat cells (CD19−) were equally lysed by wildtype (72%) and CD19-CAR-NK92 cells (71%) (Fig. 1C). These results confirm the CD19-dependent enhanced cytotoxicity of the CD19-CAR-NK92 cells against CD19+ target cells.
Knockout models of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells
Cytotoxicity of NK92-cells is mainly mediated by the perforin/granzyme pathway and the death-receptor pathway [20]. Loss of either pathway should abrogate cytotoxicity of NK92 cells. Knockout models of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells (Prf1-ko, FasL-ko and double-ko) were generated using CRISPR/Cas9, as both proteins are fundamental for the respective pathway [20] (Fig. 2A). The success of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout was demonstrated by loss of target protein expression via western blot (Fig. 2B).
The overall FasL and Prf1 expression of the single-cell clones was similar compared to wildtype cells. However, TRAIL expression was inhomogeneous. Especially the reference single-cell clones and those with Prf1-ko showed increased TRAIL expression levels, compared to wildtype NK92-cells (Fig. 2B). Stable CD19-CAR expression was verified by FACS analysis in all knockout models (Fig. 2C). Subsequently, cytotoxicity of the knockout models was tested to unravel the impact of the respective cytotoxic pathway.
Cytotoxic activity of CD19-CAR-NK92 knockout models
The cytotoxic activity of the respective knockout models was evaluated in comparison to CD19-CAR-NK92 cells with preserved perforin- and FasL-expression, which served as reference effector cells. To minimize single-cell clone driven bias, we used two cell clones for each experiment and merged the results. Detailed information about the single-cell clones’ cytotoxicity are provided in the supplemental material (Supp. Fig. 3).
Targeting Daudi cells, FasL-ko CD19-CAR-NK92 cells showed no significant difference in cytotoxic activity, compared to reference CD19-CAR-NK92 cells in every E:T ratio tested (Fig. 3A, top). Specific lysis of Daudi cells by FasL-ko models was 52%, 91%, and 95% (E:T 1:4, 1:1 and 4:1), and 65% (p = 0.05), 93% (p = 0.90), and 98% (p = 0.90) in the respective experiments using reference CD19-CAR-NK92 cells.
Targeting Karpas422 cells, specific lysis by FasL-ko CD19-CAR-NK92 cells was 7% compared to 9% by reference CD19-CAR-NK92 cells at E:T of 1:4 (p = 0.78), and 32% compared to 39% at 1:1 (p = 0.30). With more effector cells (E:T of 4:1), lysis of Karpas422 cells dropped significantly when FasL was deleted (55% vs. 74%, p = 0.01) (Fig. 3A bottom).
In contrast to knockout of FasL, knockout of Prf1 led to a significantly reduced cytotoxic activity against both, Daudi and Karpas422 cells, at any E:T ratio. Using Prf1-ko CD19-CAR-NK92 cells as effector cells, specific lysis of Daudi cells decreased to 7% compared to 65% by reference CD19-CAR-NK92 cells at an E:T ratio of 1:4, 21% compared to 93% at an E:T of 1:1 and 35% compared to 98% at an E:T of 4:1 (all p < 0.001) (Fig. 3A top). Specific lysis of Karpas422 cells decreased to 2% by Prf1-ko effector cells compared to 9% by reference effector cells at an E:T ratio of 1:4 (p < 0.01), 8% compared to 39% at an E:T of 1:1 (p < 0.001) and 20% compared to 74% at an E:T of 4:1 (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3A bottom).
Compared to an exclusive Prf1-ko, simultaneous knockout of FasL and Prf1 resulted in no additional cytotoxic deficiency at an E:T ratio of 1:4 and 1:1, in both, Daudi and Karpas422 cells (all p > 0.05). However, at an E:T ratio of 4:1, the cytotoxic activity was significantly decreased using double-knockout models targeting Daudi cells (14% vs. 35%, p < 0.01), whereas a nonsignificant reduction was obvious targeting Karpas422 cells (8% vs. 20%, p = 0.24). Overall, the CD19-CAR-NK92 cells’ cytotoxicity was superior to wtNK92-cells (Fig. 3A).
Based on these results, each pathway’s proportion of the total cytotoxic efficacy of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells was calculated (% = average reduction in cytotoxicity due to the respective knockout/cytotoxicity of reference effector cells). Cytotoxicity was largely mediated via the perforin/granzyme pathway (Daudi by 73–81%, Karpas422 cells by 65–69%). The proportion of the FasL/FasR pathway was lower, but increased in higher E:T ratios from 7% (1:4) to 20% (4:1) (Fig. 3B).
Concluding, both pathways mediate cytotoxicity of CAR-NK92 cells, but loss of the perforin/granzyme pathway reduced the cytotoxic activity of CAR-NK92 cells more profound, than loss of the Fas-pathway. Moreover, knockout of FasL could be compensated by functional perforine/granzyme pathway in most conditions, which was not the case vice versa.
Cytotoxic activity of CD19-CAR-NK92 knockout models against primary human B cells
To confirm the importance of the perforin/granzyme pathway for the cytotoxic activity of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells, even against target cells with fully functional death-receptor signaling, we used primary human B cells as target cells in a further experiment. At an E:T ratio of 1:1, specific lysis of primary B cells was 28% by FasL-ko cells and 43% by reference CD19-CAR-NK92 cells (p = 0.04). On the contrary, Prf1-ko decreased the cytotoxicity to 4% (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A green vs. blue and red columns). Using double-ko effector cells compared to exclusive Prf1-ko effector cells, no additional effect was found (3% vs. 4%; p = 0.90) (Fig. 4A yellow and red columns).
The cytotoxic efficacy was similarly mediated against non-malignant cells, as it was in malignant cells (Fig. 4B). Thus, the importance of the perforin/granzyme pathway is not a tumor specific finding.
Cytotoxic activity and inhibition of TRAIL
Since double-knockout effector cells were still capable of killing CD19+ target cells, we additionally investigated the impact of TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity using an anti-TRAIL antibody for specific inhibition [31]. By that we expected further reduced cytotoxic activity, especially when double-knockout models were used as effector cells. An E:T ratio of 1:4 was used when Daudi cells were targeted, because of the high specific lysis in the other E:T ratios and a potential risk of immeasurable effects of a TRAIL-blockade. Experiments with Karpas422 cells were performed at an E:T ratio of 1:1. The application of the anti-TRAIL antibody did not significantly reduce the cytotoxic activity of reference CD19-CAR-NK92 models, although these cells showed higher TRAIL expression in western blots. Specific lysis of Daudi cells by CD19-CAR-NK92-cells was 51% in the presence of the anti-TRAIL antibody and 62% without (p = 0.18). Lysis of Karpas422 cells was 47% in the presence of the anti-TRAIL antibody and 50% without (p = 0.43) (Fig. 5A). However, using the double-knockout effector cells, the residual specific lysis of the target cells could be further reduced by inhibition of TRAIL. In Daudi cells, specific lysis decreased to 3% in the presence of the anti-TRAIL antibody, compared to 7%. In Karpas422 cells, the specific lysis decreased to 4% compared to 10% (both p < 0.01) (Fig. 5B). These results point out that inhibition of TRAIL-mediated cytotoxicity can be compensated by other pathways.
Discussion
In this study, Prf1, FasL, and double-knockout models of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells were generated by a CRISPR-Cas9 system, to investigate cytotoxic mechanisms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of Prf1 and FasL-ko models in CAR-NK92 cells. The study’s objective was to analyze the major cytotoxic pathways and their respective contribution in mediating cytotoxicity.
The benefits of NK-cells—and particularly of the NK92-cell line—as effector cells in CAR-nant cells are able to avoid NK-cell activation and subsequent killing by several immunoescape mechanisms [21, 33]. CARs have the ability to overcome this resistance, and enhance or restore the cytotoxicity [11, 18, 34]. The optimal CAR-design in NK-cells, particularly the co-stimulatory domain, is a matter of debate [12, 13, 34]. Some preclinical and clinical trials tested second-generation CAR constructs in NK92 cells with different co-stimulatory domains and antigen binding sites, showing substantial anti-tumor efficacy [15]. In our study, insertion of the 4-1BB CD19-CAR leads to enhanced cytotoxicity against CD19+ target cells, especially against lymphoma cells, which were partly resistant toward wtNK92-cells.
The cytotoxic activity of NK92-cells is largely dependent on two pathways: the perforin/granzyme pathway and the death-receptor pathway, the latter being activated by FasL or TRAIL [19, 20, 35]. As previously described, knockout of Prf1 leads to abrogation of apoptosis induction via the perforin/granzyme pathway [36, 37]. Likewise, FasL is the only gene encoding for the FasL, by which the Fas-dependent pathway is activated [20, 38]. We generated knockout models of the respective cytotoxic pathway’s gatekeeper proteins. Generating single-cell clones may bias results, but it guaranteed complete knockout of the target genes. To reduce the potential bias, two single-cell clones of each knockout model were used for every experiment.
The findings of our study indicate the perforin/granzyme pathway as the dominant contributor of CAR-NK92 cells’ cytotoxic activity. This was irrespective of the target cells’ susceptibility to death-receptor signaling. Fas-signaling could not compensate Prf1 knockout, even in cells susceptible to rFasL (Daudi and primary B cells). Loss of the perforin/granzyme pathway strongly impaired cytotoxicity in both tested cell lines and primary B cells, in any E:T ratio. These findings are supported by previous studies, which revealed the perforine/granzyme pathway as essential for anti-tumor efficacy of wtNK-cells [39, 40].
Another finding in this study is the growing influence of the Fas-pathway in conditions with higher E:T ratios. This was shown in single-knockout and double-knockout experiments. Only with higher E:T ratios, Prf1-ko CAR-NK92 cells were able to kill a substantial proportion of target cells. Double-knockout of Prf1 and FasL had an additive effect, but only in higher E:T ratios. This is of particular interest, since NK92-cells are used irradiated in clinical trials, which limits the effector cell count by abrogation of substantial proliferation. Thus, low E:T ratios at the tumor site can be expected in vivo. Fas-related antigen independent killing via cell–cell interactions has been described for CAR-T cells, and time to effector/target-cell interaction and time to target-cell death can be shortened by increasing effector cell counts [37, 41]. This provides a potential explanation for the higher impact of Fas-dependent killing in higher E:T ratios.
Previous studies revealed the death-receptor pathway as the slower pathway (compared to perforine/granzyme) to induce apoptosis in target cells, which may bias experiments [20]. In our study, co-incubation of effector and tumor cells was 4 h. This widely excludes the possibility of missing FasL-expression due to insufficient co-incubation time as a cause for observed limited importance for cytotoxic action [20, 37]. This is underlined by the significant impact of the FasL/FasR pathway in higher E:T ratios.
The study’s next finding is the limited impact of TRAIL, if other cytotoxic pathways are functional. Inhibition of TRAIL in CAR-NK92 cells with preserved Prf1 and FasL function did not impair cytotoxicity. In double-knockout CAR-NK92 cells (Prf1 and FasL), inhibition of TRAIL nearly abrogated the residual cytotoxic effects completely. The Fas- and TRAIL-pathway both activate death-receptor signaling and caspase-dependent apoptosis in the target cell, showing redundant characteristics [20]. This may explain both, the low contribution of TRAIL to cytotoxicity in CAR-NK92 cells with preserved FasL function, but the significant impact in double-knockout models.
For unknown reasons, Daudi cells were more susceptible to CAR-NK92-mediated killing compared to Karpas422. Target expression (CD19) was not different, and FasR/TRAIL receptors were expressed by both cells. Moreover, FasL-signaling had only a marginal influence in Daudi cells in the respective knockout experiments. This makes it unlikely that the susceptibility of Daudi cells to Fas-induced apoptosis plays a role, rather suggesting other cell line specific immunoescape features of Karpas422, impairing cytotoxicity. However, the results are in-line with previous studies showing inhomogeneous susceptibility of different cell lines to CAR-NK92 cells [18, 42].
Our study has several implications for further clinical and preclinical research. Since the dominant impact of the perforin/granzyme pathway on cytotoxicity, it seems reasonable to modulate target cells’ susceptibility to cytotoxic granules by, e.g., anti-SerpinB9 therapy, to further enhance CAR-NK92 cells efficacy [43]. Since wtNK-cells switch from the perforine/granzyme pathway to the Fas-pathway during serial killing, the CAR’s impact on serial killing and the recruitment on dormant NK-cells is another interesting field for future studies [37, 44]. A recent study revealed downregulation of genes involved in Fas-mediated apoptosis as an important feature of primary resistance against CAR-T cells in B-ALL [10]. Based on our findings, this mechanism of resistance may be overcome by CAR-NK92-cells. In lymphoma, alterations in death-receptor signaling are frequent, yet with unknown implications for therapy and prognosis [45, 46]. Their contribution to resistance against CAR-therapies is of special interest in CD19-CAR-therapy [47, 48]. Both cell lines used in our study have known alterations in the Fas-pathway. A benefit of CAR-effector cells relying on the perforin/granzyme pathway, rather than the Fas-pathway, may be confirmed in future trials.
The limitations of our study are the missing in vivo experiments since the kinetics and cytotoxic pathways may be influenced by a different cytokine milieu and tumor microenvironment in vivo. Moreover, the CAR design may have impact on the respective cytotoxic pathways used by effector cells, thus our findings cannot be transferred to other CAR-constructs [34]. Furthermore, it remains unclear if our findings are transferable to NK-cells in general.
In summary, our study proves great dependency of 4-1BB-CD19-CAR-NK92 cells on the perforin/granzyme pathway to kill target cells.
References
Gross G, Waks T, Eshhar Z (1989) Expression of immunoglobulin-T-cell receptor chimeric molecules as functional receptors with antibody-type specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 86:10024–10028. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.24.10024
Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G et al (1993) Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90:720–724. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.2.720
Wang M, Munoz J, Goy A et al (2020) KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 382:1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1914347
Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y et al (2019) Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 380:1726–1737. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1817226
Bishop MR, Dickinson M, Purtill D et al (2021) Second-line Tisagenlecleucel or standard care in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116596
Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA et al (2021) Axicabtagene ciloleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2116133
Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P et al (2018) Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:47–62. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.148
Mika T, Ladigan-Badura S, Maghnouj A et al (2020) Altered T-lymphocyte biology following high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation with implications for adoptive T-cell therapy. Front Oncol 10:568056. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.568056
Hou AJ, Chen LC, Chen YY (2021) Navigating CAR-T cells through the solid-tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Drug Discov 20:531–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-021-00189-2
Singh N, Lee YG, Shestova O et al (2020) Impaired death receptor signaling in leukemia causes antigen-independent resistance by inducing CAR T-cell dysfunction. Cancer Discov 10:552–567. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0813
Zhang C, Oberoi P, Oelsner S et al (2017) Chimeric antigen receptor-engineered NK-92 cells: an off-the-shelf cellular therapeutic for targeted elimination of cancer cells and induction of protective antitumor immunity. Front Immunol 8:533. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00533
Marofi F, Saleh MM, Rahman HS et al (2021) CAR-engineered NK cells; a promising therapeutic option for treatment of hematological malignancies. Stem Cell Res Ther 12:374. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-021-02462-y
Xie G, Dong H, Liang Y et al (2020) CAR-NK cells: A promising cellular immunotherapy for cancer. EBioMedicine 59:102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102975
Liu E, Marin D, Banerjee P et al (2020) Use of CAR-transduced natural killer cells in CD19-positive lymphoid tumors. N Engl J Med 382:545–553. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1910607
Zhang J, Zheng H, Diao Y (2019) Natural killer cells and current applications of chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK-92 cells in tumor immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 20:317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20020317
Zhang C, Burger MC, Jennewein L et al (2016) ErbB2/HER2-specific NK cells for targeted therapy of glioblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djv375. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv375
Han J, Chu J, Keung Chan W et al (2015) CAR-engineered NK cells targeting wild-type EGFR and EGFRvIII enhance killing of glioblastoma and patient-derived glioblastoma stem cells. Sci Rep 5:11483. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11483
Oelsner S, Friede ME, Zhang C et al (2017) Continuously expanding CAR NK-92 cells display selective cytotoxicity against B-cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cytotherapy 19:235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.10.009
Ramírez-Labrada A, Pesini C, Santiago L et al (2022) All about (NK Cell-Mediated) death in two acts and an unexpected encore: initiation, execution and activation of adaptive immunity. Front Immunol 13:896228. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.896228
Prager I, Watzl C (2019) Mechanisms of natural killer cell-mediated cellular cytotoxicity. J Leukoc Biol 105:1319–1329. https://doi.org/10.1002/JLB.MR0718-269R
Sordo-Bahamonde C, Lorenzo-Herrero S, Payer ÁR et al (2020) Mechanisms of apoptosis resistance to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in cancer. Int J Mol Sci 21:3726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103726
Ravi D, Sarkar S, Purvey S et al (2020) Interaction kinetics with transcriptomic and secretory responses of CD19-CAR natural killer-cell therapy in CD20 resistant non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leukemia 34:1291–1304. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-019-0663-x
Benmebarek M-R, Karches CH, Cadilha BL et al (2019) Killing mechanisms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Int J Mol Sci 20:1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20061283
Mestermann K, Giavridis T, Weber J et al (2019) The tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib acts as a pharmacologic on/off switch for CAR T cells. Sci Transl Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5907
Hudecek M, Sommermeyer D, Kosasih PL et al (2015) The nonsignaling extracellular spacer domain of chimeric antigen receptors is decisive for in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Immunol Res 3:125–135. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0127
Turtle CJ, Hanafi L-A, Berger C et al (2016) CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J Clin Invest 126:2123–2138. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI85309
Baraniskin A, Birkenkamp-Demtroder K, Maghnouj A et al (2012) MiR-30a-5p suppresses tumor growth in colon carcinoma by targeting DTL. Carcinogenesis 33:732–739. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgs020
Sutlu T, Nyström S, Gilljam M et al (2012) Inhibition of intracellular antiviral defense mechanisms augments lentiviral transduction of human natural killer cells: implications for gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 23:1090–1100. https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2012.080
Vangala D, Ladigan S, Liffers ST et al (2021) Secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy by transcriptional reprogramming in patient-derived colorectal cancer models. Genome Med 13:116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-021-00926-7
Chen K, Chen L, Zhao P et al (2005) FL-CTL assay: fluorolysometric determination of cell-mediated cytotoxicity using green fluorescent protein and red fluorescent protein expressing target cells. J Immunol Methods 300:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2005.02.010
Kelly DM, ten Bokum AMC, O’Leary SM et al (2008) Bystander macrophage apoptosis after mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Ra infection. Infect Immun 76:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00614-07
Kochenderfer JN, Feldman SA, Zhao Y et al (2009) Construction and preclinical evaluation of an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Immunother 32:689–702. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181ac6138
de Charette M, Houot R (2018) Hide or defend, the two strategies of lymphoma immune evasion: potential implications for immunotherapy. Haematologica 103:1256–1268. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.184192
Bashiri Dezfouli A, Yazdi M, Pockley AG et al (2021) NK cells armed with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR): roadblocks to successful development. Cells 10:3390. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10123390
Vivier E, Tomasello E, Baratin M et al (2008) Functions of natural killer cells. Nat Immunol 9:503–510. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1582
Shi L, Mai S, Israels S et al (1997) Granzyme B (GraB) autonomously crosses the cell membrane and perforin initiates apoptosis and GraB nuclear localization. J Exp Med 185:855–866. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.185.5.855
Prager I, Liesche C, van Ooijen H et al (2019) NK cells switch from granzyme B to death receptor-mediated cytotoxicity during serial killing. J Exp Med 216:2113–2127. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20181454
Takahashi T, Tanaka M, Inazawa J, Abe T, Suda T (1994) Human Fas ligand: gene structure, chromosomal location and species specificity. Int Immunol 6(10):1567–1574. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/6.10.1567
Pardo J, Balkow S, Anel A et al (2002) Granzymes are essential for natural killer cell-mediated and perf-facilitated tumor control. Eur J Immunol 32:2881–2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-4141(2002010)32:10%3c2881:AID-IMMU2881%3e3.0.CO;2-K
van den Broek MF, Kägi D, Zinkernagel RM et al (1995) Perforin dependence of natural killer cell-mediated tumor control in vivo. Eur J Immunol 25:3514–3516. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830251246
Hong LK, Chen Y, Smith CC et al (2018) CD30-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cells target CD30+ and CD30-embryonal carcinoma via antigen-dependent and Fas/FasL interactions. Cancer Immunol Res 6:1274–1287. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0065
Romanski A, Uherek C, Bug G et al (2016) CD19-CAR engineered NK-92 cells are sufficient to overcome NK cell resistance in B-cell malignancies. J Cell Mol Med 20:1287–1294. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12810
Jiang L, Wang Y-J, Zhao J et al (2020) Direct tumor killing and immunotherapy through anti-serpinB9 therapy. Cell 183:1219-1233.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.045
Vanherberghen B, Olofsson PE, Forslund E et al (2013) Classification of human natural killer cells based on migration behavior and cytotoxic response. Blood 121:1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-06-439851
Grønbæk K, Pt S, Ralfkiaer E et al (1998) Somatic Fas mutations in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: association with extranodal disease and autoimmunity. Blood 92:3018–3024. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V92.9.3018
Rys RN, Venkataraman M, Zeng J et al (2019) Fas mutations in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): implications for disease progression and therapeutic resistance. Blood 134:1520. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-130602
Wenthe J, Naseri S, Labani-Motlagh A et al (2021) Boosting CAR T-cell responses in lymphoma by simultaneous targeting of CD40/4-1BB using oncolytic viral gene therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother 70:2851–2865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02895-7
Snow AL, Chen LJ, Nepomuceno RR et al (2001) Resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis in EBV-infected B cell lymphomas is due to defects in the proximal Fas signaling pathway. J Immunol 167:5404–5411. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5404
Acknowledgements
We thank Matthias Becker, Britta Redeker and Andrea Reinert for excellent technical support. Also, we thank Karin Schork for statistical advice.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was supported by a FoRUM Grant (Ruhr University Bochum, no.: F978-2020) and a Grant of the Heinrich und Alma Vogelsang Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JA, TM, AM, RS and SAH designed the study. JA, SD and VN-E performed the experiments. JA, TM, MH, SAH and RS wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no Conflict of interests.
Informed consent
Volunteers agreed on participation in this study and gave their written informed consent in blood sample collection, sample processing and publication of potentially identifiable information.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Althaus, J., Nilius-Eliliwi, V., Maghnouj, A. et al. Cytotoxicity of CD19-CAR-NK92 cells is primarily mediated via perforin/granzyme pathway. Cancer Immunol Immunother 72, 2573–2583 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03443-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-023-03443-1