Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to develop predictive models for postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the split glomerular filtration rate measured by radionuclide (rGFR), as choosing radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) for complex renal masses requires accurate prediction of postoperative eGFR.
Methods
Patients who underwent RN or PN for a single renal mass at Xijing Hospital between 2008 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Preoperative split rGFR was evaluated using technetium-99 m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99 m DTPA) renal dynamic imaging, and the postoperative short-term (< 7 days) and long-term (3 months to 5 years) eGFRs were assessed. Linear mixed-effect models were used to predict eGFRs, with marginal R2 reflecting predictive ability.
Results
After excluding patients with missing follow-up eGFRs, the data of 2251 (RN: 1286, PN: 965) and 2447 (RN: 1417, PN: 1030) patients were respectively included in the long-term and short-term models. Two models were established to predict long-term eGFRs after RN (marginal R2 = 0.554) and PN (marginal R2 = 0.630), respectively. Two other models were established to predict short-term eGFRs after RN (marginal R2 = 0.692) and PN (marginal R2 = 0.656), respectively. In terms of long-term eGFRs, laparoscopic and robotic surgery were superior to open surgery in both PN and RN.
Conclusions
We developed novel tools for predicting short-term and long-term eGFRs after RN and PN based on split rGFR that can help in preoperative decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Radical nephrectomy (RN) and partial nephrectomy (PN) are both the most effective ways to treat localized renal masses. In addition to oncological outputs, clinicians also prioritize postoperative renal function (RF), with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) being the key indicator representing total RF. PN can better preserve the eGFR than RN [1]. However, the beneficial impact of PN does not seem to translate into survival benefits unless the preoperative eGFR is already significantly impaired [2,3,4]. Therefore, patients with high tumor complexity, no preexisting chronic kidney disease, or proteinuria are recommended to undergo RN rather than PN if the expected eGFR is greater than 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 after RN [5]. In these cases, the downside of RN appears to be inconsequential [6], and PN is associated with an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and compromised oncologic outcomes. Moreover, clinicians should consider referring patients to nephrology if the expected eGFR is not satisfactory after intervention [5]. All of these aspects require accurate predictions of postoperative eGFR.
Unfortunately, there are few models to predict postoperative eGFR. Information about preoperative split RF is common lacking [7,8,9,10], which results in limited ability in predicting eGFR after RN [11]. Other studies estimated split RF from images using parenchymal volume analysis [11,12,13,14,15]. These methods require volume calculating software [13] and training, and are not suitable for routine applications. Furthermore, these studies were limited by small sample sizes. Numerous medical institutions routinely use technetium-99 m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Tc-99 m DTPA) renal dynamic imaging (RDI) to assess preoperative split glomerular filtration rate measured by radionuclide (rGFR). However, its role in predicting postoperative eGFR is still far from clear, and its application is based on superficial clinical experience.
Thus, this study aimed to develop preoperative tools for predicting postoperative eGFR based on split rGFR. Separate models predicting short-term and long-term eGFRs were constructed to cover almost all periods after surgery.
Methods
Study design and participants
In this retrospective cohort study, data on patients with a single, unilateral renal mass who underwent RN or PN at Xijing Hospital from August 2008 to March 2022 were collected. Patients with preoperative renal failure (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2) were excluded.
We collected these variables as potential predictors of postoperative eGFR based on previous research, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, preoperative eGFR, rGFR of the operative side, rGFR of the healthy side, serum cystatin C, diabetes, hypertension, surgical approach (open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery), and time from surgery (TFS).
Follow-up and study outcomes
The single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was routinely calculated by Tc-99 m DTPA RDI using the Gate’s method before surgery [16]. During hospitalization, serum creatinine was rechecked within 7 days postoperatively. The planned follow-up included serum creatinine measurements at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and then annually thereafter until 5 years.
The eGFRs were calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula [17]. The long-term models predicted the eGFRs at 3 months, 6 months, and 1–5 years postoperatively. The short-term models predicted the eGFRs at 1–7 days postoperatively.
Statistical analysis
The association between preoperative characteristics and postoperative eGFRs was evaluated using linear mixed-effect models with random patient-specific intercepts. Moreover, we introduced a temporal autocorrelation structure for each model [18].
Multivariable models were developed using backward selection of all the preoperative factors and their two-way interactions with TFS, with the significance level set to 0.01. P-values were provided using Satterthwaite's degrees of freedom method via the R package lmerTest. Main effects were included whenever the interaction with TFS was retained in model selection [7].
The correlations between the preoperative variables were investigated using the Spearman correlation test. In the process of performing the Spearman correlation test and establishing multivariable models, patients without complete data for all preoperative features were excluded.
Marginal and conditional R2 were used to summarize the predictive ability of the models [19], with the value of 0 representing no predictive ability and 1.0 representing perfect predictive ability. The marginal R2 helped describe the ability of preoperative characteristics to predict eGFR in future patients. The conditional R2 also included between- and within-patient variability and can be considered as the total variation that can be explained by the models.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows and R version 4.2.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The measurement data with a nonnormal distribution are presented as the median (interquartile range, IQR).
Results
Patient characteristics
The study flowchart is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
2539 patients (RN: 1417, PN: 1122) with complete preoperative information were enrolled in the analyze about the correlations among preoperative predictors.
2251 patients [RN: 1286 (786 males, 500 females), PN: 965 (671 males, 294 females)] with at least one long-term (> 3 months) follow-up eGFR were enrolled in the development of long-term model (Table 1). The age was 55 (48–64) years for RN patients, and was 54 (46–63) years for PN patients. The tumor size was 5 (3.9–6.8) cm for RN patients, and was 3.4 (2.5–4.2) cm for PN patients. The preoperative eGFR was 75.5 (65.3–89.8) ml/min/1.73 m2 for RN patient, and was 79.6 (68.2–96.3) ml/min/1.73 m2 for PN patients. The follow-up time after RN and PN was both 24 (6–48) months. In the long-term follow-up of RN patients, no cases had renal failure. However, in the long-term follow-up of PN patients, renal failure was observed in 2 patients, with the initial cases occurring at 3 years and 4 years, respectively.
2447 patients (RN: 1417, PN: 1030) with at least one short-term (< 7 days) follow-up eGFR were enrolled in the development of short-term model (Table 1). The short-term follow-up time after RN was 3 (1–5) days. The short-term follow-up time after PN was 2 (1–4) days. Within 7 days after RN, no cases had renal failure. However, within 7 days after PN, 2 patients experienced renal failure, with the first occurrence observed both at 2 days.
The correlation analysis of preoperative predictors
The correlations among preoperative predictors were shown in the heat plot (Supplementary Fig. 2). Strong positive correlations were observed between the rGFR of the operative side and rGFR of the healthy side (r = 0.531, P < 0.001) and between age and serum cystatin C (r = 0.404, P < 0.001). Additionally, strong negative correlations were observed between the rGFR of the operative side and serum cystatin C (r = − 0.450, P < 0.001), between the rGFR of the healthy side and serum cystatin C (r = − 0.420, P < 0.001), and between age and preoperative eGFR (r = − 0.411, P < 0.001).
Predicting long-term eGFR beyond 3 months postoperative
A multivariable model was constructed to predict the eGFR beyond 3 months after RN (Table 2, Supplementary Table 1): postoperative eGFR ~ Intercept + age + preoperative eGFR + rGFR of the operative side + rGFR of the healthy side + serum cystatin C + diabetes + surgical method + TFS + preoperative eGFR × TFS + rGFR of the healthy side × TFS + serum cystatin C × TFS + surgical method × TFS. Older age, lower preoperative eGFR, higher rGFR of the operative side, lower rGFR of the healthy side, higher serum cystatin C, diabetes, open surgical approach, and shorter TFS were associated with worse long-term eGFR. Moreover, patients with higher preoperative eGFR, lower rGFR of the healthy side, higher serum cystatin C, and open surgical approach had less recovery of eGFR per unit time. The marginal and conditional R2 values were 0.554 and 0.663, respectively.
Moreover, a prediction model for the eGFR beyond 3 months after PN was constructed (Table 2, Supplementary Table 2). Older age, lower preoperative eGFR, higher serum cystatin C, open surgical approach, and shorter TFS were associated with worse long-term eGFR. Additionally, patients with older age, higher preoperative eGFR, higher serum cystatin C and open surgical approach had less recovery of eGFR per unit time. The marginal and conditional R2 values were 0.630 and 0.708, respectively.
Predicting short-term eGFR within 7 days postoperative
A multivariable model was designed to predict the eGFR within 7 days after RN (Table 3, Supplementary Table 3). Older age, higher BMI, lower preoperative eGFR, higher rGFR of the operative side, lower rGFR of the healthy side and longer TFS indicated worse short-term eGFR. Additionally, patients with higher rGFR of the healthy side had more recovery of eGFR per unit time. The marginal and conditional R2 values were 0.692 and 0.885, respectively.
Moreover, a model was constructed to predict the eGFR within 7 days after PN (Table 3, Supplementary Table 4). Older age, larger tumor size, lower preoperative eGFR, higher serum cystatin C, and shorter TFS were correlated with worse short-term eGFR. The marginal and conditional R2 values were 0.656 and 0.875, respectively.
Discussion
The prediction of postoperative eGFR can help make informed choices between RN and PN, especially for complex renal tumors. Tc-99 m DTPA RDI has been widely used to measure split RF [20]. However, how to use this important information about split rGFR to predict postoperative eGFR lacks computational models. Hence, we developed a pretreatment tool for predicting eGFR based on split rGFR.
For example, a 56-year-old man with a rGFR of 24 ml/min/1.73 m2 on the operative side, a rGFR of 36 ml/min/1.73 m2 on the healthy side, serum cystatin C of 0.91 mg/L, and a preoperative eGFR of 67 ml/min/1.73 m2 had a history of hypertension and diabetes. If RN was performed, the predicted eGFRs were 50, 53 and 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 2 years after open, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, respectively. If PN was performed, the predicted eGFRs were 67, 73 and 73 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 2 years after open, laparoscopic and robotic surgery, respectively. To avoid stage 3 chronic kidney disease, PN would be the preferred treatment, especially laparoscopic and robotic PN. In addition, because the predicted eGFRs were greater than 45 ml/min/1.73 m2 after RN, RN was also feasible according to American Urological Association guidelines [5]. Thus, if clinicians only focus on the preoperative rGFR of 36 ml/min/1.73 m2 on the healthy side, they will not be able to make an objective judgment of postoperative eGFR.
Split rGFR is at the core of the prediction models. In our study, higher rGFR of the healthy side and lower rGFR of the operative side meant higher eGFR after RN. Moreover, patients who underwent RN with higher rGFR on the healthy side also had more recovery of eGFR over time.
Previous study suggested that patients underwent laparoscopic PN maintained slightly higher eGFR than those underwent open PN, and researchers explained this phenomenon as the transient ischemia caused by pneumoperitoneum could limit renal reperfusion injury [21]. Additionally, another study suggested that robotic PN allows better preservation of split eGFR than laparoscopic PN by increasing the parenchymal preservation ratio [22]. Our models further demonstrated the differences in postoperative eGFR among these three surgical methods. For long-term eGFR after PN, laparoscopic and robotic surgery were superior to open surgery, possibly because of the above reasons. Interestingly, for long-term eGFR after RN, laparoscopic and robotic surgery were also superior to open surgery. We speculate that minimally invasive technology reduced overall trauma, which indirectly benefited the recovery of eGFR. The eGFR difference between laparoscopic RN and robotic RN decreased over time, indicating that robotic RN was more conducive to early recovery of RF. To our knowledge, few studies have reported the protective effect of minimally invasive technology on eGFR after RN. Importantly, this indicates that for patients with poor rGFR on the healthy side, if RN is chosen, minimally invasive surgery should also be given priority, as it is likely to change the outcome of renal insufficiency.
Generally, the merits of this study were clear. First, we used a large cohort of 2251 patients for long-term model and 2447 patients for short-term model. Based on this large cohort, our models can predict eGFR at many time points after surgery, not just at a single time point as in most studies. Second, we utilized the information of split rGFR, which enabled our models to have high prediction ability for the eGFRs after RN. In other prediction models not based on split RF, the prediction ability for RN was significantly lower than that for PN [11].
However, this study has several limitations. Above all, the analysis is based on retrospective data from a single center, which can be associated with information bias and selection bias. Additionally, data on tumor complexity, such as the RENAL nephrometry score [23], 24-h proteinuria [24], co-existing comorbidities other than diabetes and hypertension, lifestyle factors as smoking or alcohol use, or medication usage were not included. These parameters may improve the prediction ability, but they will also greatly increase the difficulty of clinical usage. Finally, the accuracy of split rGFR measurements by Tc-99 m DTPA RDI is different in patients with different degrees of RF impairment, which generally underestimates GFR [25]. Note that we use rGFR to predict eGFRs, the deviation between rGFR and actual single-kidney GFR does not affect the application of the models.
In conclusion, our study developed novel tools to accurately predict short-term and long-term eGFRs after RN or PN based on split rGFR, and that is helpful for preoperative decision-making and communication. A minimally invasive approach seem to improve postoperative eGFRs after both PN and RN, which needs more evidence to confirm. Although awaiting external validation, the results of this study may supplement the surgical guidelines for patients with renal tumors.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N et al (2022) Kidney cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 20(1):71–90. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2022.0001
Scosyrev E, Messing EM, Sylvester R et al (2014) Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904. Eur Urol 65(2):372–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.044
Palacios DA, Zabor EC, Munoz-Lopez C et al (2021) Does reduced renal function predispose to cancer-specific mortality from renal cell carcinoma? Eur Urol 79(6):774–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2021.02.035
Antonelli A, Minervini A, Sandri M et al (2018) Below safety limits, every unit of glomerular filtration rate counts: assessing the relationship between renal function and cancer-specific mortality in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 74(5):661–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.029
Campbell SC, Clark PE, Chang SS et al (2021) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: evaluation, management, and follow-up: AUA guideline: part I. J Urol 206(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001911
Weight CJ, Miller DC, Campbell SC et al (2013) The management of a clinical t1b renal tumor in the presence of a normal contralateral kidney. J Urol 189(4):1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.030
Bhindi B, Lohse CM, Schulte PJ et al (2019) Predicting renal function outcomes after partial and radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol 75(5):766–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.021
Aguilar PD, Wilson B, Ascha M et al (2021) New baseline renal function after radical or partial nephrectomy: a simple and accurate predictive model. J Urol 205(5):1310–1320. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001549
Kim HL, Shah SK, Tan W et al (2009) Estimation and prediction of renal function in patients with renal tumor. J Urol 181(6):2451–2460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.112
Yokoyama M, Fujii Y, Takeshita H et al (2014) Renal function after radical nephrectomy: development and validation of predictive models in Japanese patients. Int J Urol 21(3):238–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12277
Rathi N, Yasuda Y, Palacios DA et al (2022) Split renal function is fundamentally important for predicting functional recovery after radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol Open Sci 40:112–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.04.008
Liss MA, DeConde R, Caovan D et al (2016) Parenchymal volumetric assessment as a predictive tool to determine renal function benefit of nephron-sparing surgery compared with radical nephrectomy. J Endourol 30(1):114–121. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0411
Ye Y, Tanaka H, Wang Y et al (2020) Split renal function in patients with renal masses: utility of parenchymal volume analysis vs nuclear renal scans. Bju Int 125(5):686–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14997
Rathi N, Palacios DA, Abramczyk E et al (2022) Predicting GFR after radical nephrectomy: the importance of split renal function. World J Urol 40(4):1011–1018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03918-9
Rathi N, Yasuda Y, Attawettayanon W et al (2022) Optimizing prediction of new-baseline glomerular filtration rate after radical nephrectomy: are algorithms really necessary? Int Urol Nephrol 54(10):2537–2545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-022-03298-y
You S, Ma X, Zhang C et al (2018) Determination of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with CT urography versus renal dynamic imaging Gates method. Eur Radiol 28(3):1077–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5061-z
Matsushita K, Mahmoodi BK, Woodward M et al (2012) Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate. JAMA 307(18):1941–1951. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.3954
Sydeman WJ, Schoeman DS, Thompson SA et al (2021) Hemispheric asymmetry in ocean change and the productivity of ecosystem sentinels. Science 372(6545):980–983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf1772
Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H (2013) A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4(2):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
Pi Y, Zhao Z, Yang P et al (2023) Deep regression using (99m)Tc-DTPA dynamic renal imaging for automatic calculation of the glomerular filtration rate. Eur Radiol 33(1):34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08970-6
Adamy A, Favaretto RL, Nogueira L et al (2010) Recovery of renal function after open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 58(4):596–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.05.044
Kobayashi S, Mutaguchi J, Kashiwagi E et al (2021) Clinical advantages of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in terms of global and split renal functions: A propensity score-matched comparative analysis. Int J Urol 28(6):630–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14525
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182(3):844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
Yang DY, Thompson RH, Zaid HB et al (2017) Severity of preoperative proteinuria is a risk factor for overall mortality in patients undergoing nephrectomy. J Urol 198(4):795–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.016
Huang Q, Chen Y, Zhang M et al (2018) Comparative evaluation of technetium-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid renal dynamic imaging versus the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation for the estimation of GFR. Int Urol Nephrol 50(4):733–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1811-3
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program (grant number 2021SF-053). Moreover, we would like to thank Shuang Zhang (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China) for assistance in data analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Project development: JY, WZ; Data collection: WZ, GH, DW, DJ, KL, LH, ZX, LK, PL; Data analysis: WZ, GH, ZN. Manuscript writing: WZ, GH, DJ, JY; Manuscript editing: JY, GZ, FY, DW.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Informed consent
All the procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Xijing Hospital (KY20222256-F-1).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, W., Hou, G., Ju, D. et al. Predicting estimated glomerular filtration rate after partial and radical nephrectomy based on split renal function measured by radionuclide: a large-scale retrospective study. World J Urol 41, 3567–3573 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04686-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04686-4