Abstract
We investigated the relationship between the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD), which has remained unknown to date. Reanalysis data and linear baroclinic model experiments were employed in our study. The results showed significant correlation between the March NAO and the boreal summer and autumn IOD, independent of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation signal, verified by partial correlation analysis. Air–sea interaction over the western North Pacific (WNP) is a significant aspect of the physical mechanism through which the March NAO affects the subsequent IOD. A strong positive March NAO induces equivalent barotropic cyclonic circulation over the WNP through a steady Rossby wave, accompanied by a local tripole sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly pattern. Facilitated by local air–sea positive feedback, the low-level cyclonic circulation and associated precipitation anomalies over the WNP persist from early spring to summer and shift equatorward. During May–June, the WNP anomalous cyclone strengthens the southeasterly wind and enhances cooling off Sumatra–Java through local meridional circulation. Such circulation ascends over the WNP and descends over the tropical southeastern Indian Ocean and Maritime Continent. Subsequently, wind–evaporation–SST and wind–thermocline–SST positive feedback in the tropical Indian Ocean contribute to IOD development. A diagnosis of ocean mixed-layer heat budget indicated that the ocean dynamic process associated with the NAO contributes more to IOD development than does atmospheric thermal forcing. Determining the influence mechanism of the March NAO on the subsequent IOD is considered useful in advancing the seasonal prediction of IOD.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) is a major aspect of climate variability that develops from coupled air–sea interactions in the tropical Indian Ocean. A positive IOD event brings about warm and cold sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies (SSTAs) in the tropical western and southeastern Indian Ocean, respectively, while a negative IOD event does the opposite (Saji et al. 1999; Webster et al. 1999). Such IOD events significantly influence variabilities in oceanic processes (Chen et al. 2015, 2016a, b; Liu et al. 2015), the Indian Ocean carbon cycle (Valsala et al. 2020), and climate over the Indian Ocean rim and remote countries by altering ocean–atmosphere circulations (Saji and Yamagata 2003; Cai et al. 2014; Xu et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021). Therefore, academic research on the triggering and development mechanisms of IOD is considered worthwhile.
Occurrences of IOD mostly result from the forcing of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the tropical Pacific Ocean (Fischer et al. 2005; Zhang et al. 2015; Fan et al. 2017; Stuecker et al. 2017), as well as local air–sea interaction in the tropical Indian Ocean (Saji et al. 1999; Webster et al. 1999; Rao and Behera 2005). Meanwhile, numerous studies have revealed triggering mechanisms independent of the ENSO. For instance, employing coupled simulation, Fischer et al. (2005) suggested that anomalous Hadley circulation over the eastern Indian Ocean and Maritime Continent during the boreal spring could trigger the IOD. According to Wang et al. (2016), a springtime rainfall deficit in Indonesia could stimulate a positive IOD through local surface wind response. The occurrence of an extreme positive IOD in 2019 has been associated with a record-breaking inter-hemispheric pressure gradient between Australia and the South China Sea after May (Lu and Ren 2020) and thermocline warming in the tropical southwestern Indian Ocean during March–May (Du et al. 2020). Other triggers also significantly contribute to the development of the IOD, such as a preceding subtropical IOD (Feng et al. 2014; Huang et al. 2021), subtropical high pressure in the Southern Hemisphere (Zhang et al. 2020), preceding December Laptev Sea Ice (Chen et al. 2021), and spring–summer north tropical Atlantic SSTAs (Zhang et al. 2022). Further, the Asian summer monsoon plays a crucial role in the triggering and development of IOD (Drbohlav et al. 2007; Krishnan and Swapna 2009). Summer monsoon circulation over the tropical Indian Ocean provides a favorable background condition for the development of the IOD (Annamalai et al. 2003; Xiang et al. 2011). Early onset of the Bay of Bengal summer monsoon triggers a positive IOD by inducing the equatorial easterly wind anomaly (Sun et al. 2015). The strong Northwest Pacific summer monsoon and South China Sea summer monsoon facilitate the growth of a positive IOD event (Kajikawa et al. 2003; Huang and Shukla 2007; Zhang et al. 2018, 2019). Recently, Jiang et al. (2022) have indicated the role of different South Asian summer monsoon anomalies in modulating the SSTA pattern during IOD development. Strong or weak South Asian summer monsoon conditions induce stronger SSTA amplitudes in the eastern and western poles of the IOD, respectively.
The influence of mid–high latitude atmospheric circulation over the Northern Hemisphere on the IOD is not well investigated and understood. However, several studies have indicated that anomalous mid–high latitude circulation remarkably influences the subtropical and tropical climate (Gong et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2014; Cui et al. 2015; Oshika et al. 2015; Yu et al. 2021). For example, the spring Arctic Oscillation (AO) strongly affects the subsequent East Asian summer monsoon and ENSO by modulating atmospheric circulation over the western North Pacific (WNP; Nakamura et al. 2006, 2007; Gong et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2014). Winter AO/North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) affects the simultaneous tropical Indian Ocean precipitation, as well as the following summer SSTAs and monsoon circulation (Gong et al. 2014, 2017a, b). Similarly, the NAO crucially influences both the East Asian and the South Asian summer monsoon through a downstream Rossby wave propagation (Wu et al. 2009; Cui et al. 2015; Yu et al. 2021).
Considering the key role of the winter–spring AO/NAO on the subsequent ENSO and the Asian summer monsoon and the close linkage between the ENSO as well as the Asian summer monsoon and the IOD, it is reasonable to infer that the preceding winter–spring AO/NAO could influence the development of a subsequent IOD. The key question to be answered in our study is whether a preceding NAO could affect the following IOD. If yes, what are the possible physical mechanisms? What is the relative importance of ocean dynamic processes and atmospheric thermal forcing in the process of an NAO affecting the following IOD? To address these questions, we conducted preliminary statistical analysis and found a significant relationship between the March NAO and the subsequent summer and autumn IOD (Fig. 1a). However, the correlations between the NAO of other months in the boreal winter–spring and the IOD were insignificant (Fig. 1a). Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the March NAO on the development of the subsequent IOD.
In Sect. 2, we present the data, methodology, and model, and the relationship between the NAO and IOD is shown in Sect. 3. The possible mechanisms through which the March NAO influences the subsequent IOD are discussed in Sect. 4, and our investigation of the ocean mixed-layer heat budget is presented in Sect. 5. A summary of the study is presented in Sect. 6.
2 Data, methodology, and model
2.1 Data
We used the Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature V5, a global SST dataset from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The horizontal resolution of the dataset is 2° × 2° (Huang et al. 2017). Atmospheric circulation variables (e.g., wind fields and geopotential height), precipitation, mean surface, top heat flux, mean total precipitation, and evaporation rate were obtained from the European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis V5 dataset, with 1° × 1° horizontal resolution (Hersbach et al. 2020). These datasets contain the monthly mean values for the period 1950–2020. The monthly sea surface height (SSH) dataset (1° × 1°; 1958–2017) was acquired from ECMWF Ocean Reanalysis System 4 (Balmaseda et al. 2013).
To calculate the mixed-layer heat budget equation, we obtained the pentad potential temperature, and horizontal and vertical velocities from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ocean Data Assimilation System (GODAS) at 40 levels (Behringer and Xue. 2004). The daily surface heat flux dataset was obtained from newly developed Trop-Flux products (Kumar et al. 2012). Following Mao and Wang (2018), all GODAS variables were interpolated to 1° × 1° horizontal resolution and the Trop-Flux products were converted into pentad datasets. After removing linear trends, a 2–9-year bandpass Lanczos filter was used to extract the interannual signal (Yu et al. 2021).
2.2 Methodology
We employed several indexes in this study. Differences in area-averaged SSTAs between the tropical western (10° S–10° N, 50°–70° E) and tropical southeastern (10° S–0°, 90°–110° E) Indian Ocean (TSEIO) were defined as the IOD index (Saji et al. 1999). An IOD event was identified when the September–October–November (SON) averaged IOD index was greater than 1 standard deviation. The Niño3.4 index was defined as area-averaged SSTAs in the Niño3.4 region (5° N–5° S, 120°–170° W; Trenberth 1997). The Indian Ocean basin mode (IOBM) index was calculated from area-averaged SSTAs in the tropical Indian Ocean (20° S–20° N, 40°–100° E; Guo et al. 2018). The NAO index was calculated as the difference in the regionally zonal-averaged sea level pressure (SLP) anomaly over the North Atlantic region from 80° W to 30° E between 35° N and 65° N (Li and Wang 2003). A positive NAO event was defined when the NAO index in March was greater than 1 standard deviation.
A horizontal wave-activity flux based on a zonally varying basic flow was applied to reflect the propagation of Rossby wave energy. The horizontal flux in the pressure coordinate system is expressed as follows (Takaya and Nakamura 2001):
where the overbar and primes denote the time mean of the period 1950–2020 and time anomalies, respectively. \(P\), \(\overrightarrow {V} = (u,v)\), and \(\varphi\) represent the pressure, horizontal wind velocity, and stream function, respectively. The subscripts x and y represent the derivatives in the zonal and meridional directions, respectively.
Vertically integrated diabatic heating (Q1) is defined as follows (Boer 1986; Trenberth and Solomon 1994):
where RT indicates net downward radiation at the top of atmosphere, including the mean top net shortwave and longwave radiation flux; FS is net surface heat flux, defined as the sum of the mean surface latent and sensible heat flux, and net longwave and shortwave radiation flux; L represents the latent heat owing to evaporation, 2.5 × 106 J kg–1; P and E indicate the precipitation rate and surface evapotranspiration, respectively.
The mixed-layer heat equation (Li et al. 2002; He et al. 2019) is:
where \(\overline{()} = \frac{1}{h}\int_{ - h}^{0} {dz}\) indicates the vertical mean values over the mixed layer; the mixed–layer depth h is approximately 45 m in the tropical Indian Ocean (Du et al. 2005; He et al. 2019); T is the potential temperature; u, v, and w are the zonal, meridional, and vertical currents, respectively; the downward net surface heat flux Qnet is defined as the sum of the net downward shortwave and longwave radiation flux, and latent and sensible heat flux; and Qp is shortwave penetration through the mixed-layer depth. Following Paulson and Simpson (1977), the solar radiation penetration parameterization scheme is:
where SW is downward shortwave radiation at the sea surface, r = 0.67, L1 = 1, and L2 = 17 (Dong et al. 2007). The density of seawater ρ is 1 026 kg m−3, and its specific heat Cp is 3 986 J kg−1 K−1. R in (4) is the residual term, such as the unresolved subgrid-scale turbulence and the neglected horizontal diffusion (Du et al. 2005; Yue et al. 2021).
We employed several statistical methods in our study, including linear correlation, partial correlation, regression, partial regression, and singular value decomposition (SVD; Li and Lu 2017; Zhang et al. 2018; Xia et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020). The two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of the results.
2.3 Model
The linear baroclinic model (LBM) was used to examine the response of atmospheric circulation to prescribed diabatic heating (Watanabe and Kimoto 2000; Watanabe et al. 2002). Reanalysis data from NCEP1 were used as the model input. The model generally reaches a steady state at approximately 10 days (Watanabe and Jin 2003); therefore, each experiment integrated 30 days. The averaged results of days 15–30 showed a steady response to idealized diabatic heating.
3 Relationship between NAO and IOD
The spatiotemporal correlation analysis between the March NAO and subsequent IOD indicated that the correlation becomes significant in late spring, reaches a peak (0.46) in summer, and decreases quickly in winter (Fig. 1a). Considering the possible effects of the preceding winter–spring ENSO and IOBM on the IOD (Guo et al. 2015), we conducted partial correlation analysis by excluding the effect of ENSO and IOBM, as shown in Table 1. The correlation between the March NAO and the subsequent IOD remained nearly unchanged, suggesting that the preceding ENSO and IOBM had little influence on the relationship between the NAO and IOD. Accordingly, the influence of preceding winter–spring ENSO and IOBM were disregarded in the subsequent analysis. The same result (not shown) is presented for the NAO index derived from the time series of the leading Empirical Orthogonal Function of SLP anomalies over the Atlantic sector (20°–80° N, 90° W–40° E; Hurrell and Deser 2009).
Figure 1b shows the normalized time series of the March NAO index and SON-averaged IOD index. There are 11 (8) positive (negative) IOD events during the period 1950–2020, including 1961, 1967, 1972, 1982, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2002, 2006, 2015, 2019 (1960, 1975, 1996, 1998, 2005, 2010, 2016, 2020). This result is largely consistent with that of previous studies (Du et al. 2013; Endo and Tozuka 2016; Jiang et al. 2022). Just over the half (54%) of the positive IOD events coincide with the positive March NAO events, including 1961, 1967, 1982, 1994, 1997, and 2019.
As shown in Fig. 2, the relationship between the March NAO and IOD was verified by comparison of bimonthly regression maps of the March NAO against the tropical Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean SSTAs and surface wind anomalies from spring to autumn. As regards the positive phase of the March NAO, significant negative SSTAs (i.e., regression coefficients) occur across the tropical Indian Ocean, accompanied by northerly wind anomalies from the continent during March–April (Fig. 2a). Southeasterly wind anomalies off Sumatra and easterly wind anomalies over the equatorial Indian Ocean start developing during May–June. Correspondingly, significant positive SSTAs replace negative SSTAs in the tropical western Indian Ocean, and negative SSTAs in the TSEIO gradually intensify (Fig. 2b). The east–west SST gradient promotes IOD development, attaining a peak during September–October (Fig. 2b–d). The seasonal evolution of the March NAO-associated SSTAs in the tropical Indian Ocean well repeats the development features of the IOD, as was described in previous studies (Saji et al. 1999; Zhang et al. 2018). Positive SSTAs spread across the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean during May–October, however, they are insignificant at the 90% confidence level (Fig. 2b–d). To further verify the role of the March NAO on the SSTAs in the tropical Indian Ocean, we conducted additional partial regression analysis. After excluding the simultaneous ENSO signal, the insignificant positive SSTAs in the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean disappears, but the dipole SSTA pattern in the tropical Indian Ocean is still established and significant during May–October (Fig. R1a–d). When the simultaneous IOD signal is excluded, the dipole SSTA pattern in the tropical Indian Ocean and the insignificant positive SSTAs in the tropical eastern Pacific both do not develop (Fig. R1e–h). These spatiotemporal results suggest that the March NAO has a robust relationship with the following IOD. A possible physical mechanism linking the March NAO and subsequent IOD is revealed in the following section.
4 Possible mechanisms of March NAO influencing subsequent IOD
4.1 Atmospheric circulation associated with March NAO from spring to summer
Geopotential height and wave-activity flux anomalies at 300 hPa associated with the March NAO indicate that a steady Rossby wave extends from the North Atlantic to the WNP (i.e., the east of Japan) along the poleward side of the subtropical westerly jet (Fig. 3a). The geopotential height in the mid–high latitude at 500 and 850 hPa present a similar pattern, suggesting an equivalent barotropic structure, particularly the WNP cyclone (Fig. 3a–c). The WNP low-level cyclonic circulation prevails from spring to summer, and the center shifts equatorward during May–June (Figs. 2a, b, 3c, d). These findings correspond with those from Hu et al. (2021), and they demonstrated that the equatorward displacement of the WNP cyclone induced by the positive March AO favors the early onset of the South China Sea summer monsoon. Previous studies have indicated the role of the WNP atmospheric circulation anomalies on the development of IOD (Kajikawa et al. 2003; Huang and Shukla 2007). Therefore, it is inferred that the WNP circulation anomalies linked to the March NAO are a key connection between the March NAO and subsequent IOD. The memory of atmospheric circulation is short (Gong et al. 2011) and a consequent question is what are the maintenance mechanisms of cyclonic circulation from spring to summer.
During March–April, northeasterly wind anomalies to the northwestern side of the WNP cyclonic circulation induce significant negative SSTAs by strengthening the climatological trade wind and transporting dry and cold air southward (Figs. 2a, 4a). Southwesterly and easterly wind anomalies in the southeastern and northern flanks of the cyclone, respectively, reduce the mean wind, thereby promoting warm SSTAs (Figs. 2a, 4a). In association with anomalous atmospheric circulation, a significant tripole SSTA pattern becomes established locally. This pattern is characterized by cold SSTAs in the central pole (20°–40° N, 120°–180° E) and warm SSTAs in the northern and southern poles. Warm SSTAs in the southern pole extend toward the eastern North Pacific, bearing some resemblance to the Pacific Meridional Mode (Fig. 2a; Chiang and Vimont 2004; Fan et al. 2021). The net surface heat flux pattern, which is dominated by latent heat flux, bears a close resemblance to the WNP SSTA pattern, indicating that net surface heat flux dominates the formation of the SSTA pattern during March–April (Figs. 2a, S2). Further, cyclonic circulation promotes cooling by upwelling linked to increased Ekman pumping (Gong et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2014). The conclusion is, therefore, that WNP cyclonic circulation causes the observed SSTA pattern through wind–evaporation–SST (WES) feedback and Ekman pumping.
We further examined the feedback of SST on atmospheric circulation. Warm SSTAs in the subtropical WNP contribute to the ascending motion and convection development, accompanying significant above-normal precipitation and diabatic heating in the southern and eastern flanks of the cyclone during March–April (Figs. 2a, 4a, d). Following the Sverdrup vorticity balance along the subtropics (Liu et al. 2001; Rodwell and Hoskins 2001), an anomalous cyclonic circulation is generated over the northwestern side of the heating region, which, in turn, sustains the WNP cyclonic circulation. Therefore, the air–sea positive feedback over the subtropical WNP maintains low-level cyclonic circulation from spring to summer (Figs. 2a–c, 3c–d, 4a–c; Gong et al. 2011). Moreover, Rossby wave response associated with positive diabatic heating has the strongest westerly wind to the south of the heating center (Gill 1980; Hu et al. 2021); accordingly, warm SSTAs and cyclonic circulations develop equatorward (Fig. 2a–c, 3c–d, 4a–c). The next question that needs to be answered is how the WNP cyclone triggers the IOD.
We conducted SVD analysis of SLP anomalies over the northern Atlantic (defined as the left field) and SSTAs over the WNP (defined as the right field) during March to further reveal the relationship between the March NAO and March WNP SSTAs (Fig. 5). The first leading mode (SVD1), explaining 54% of the total co-variance, presents an evident dipole SLP pattern (i.e., a typical NAO mode) over the northern Atlantic and a tripole SSTA pattern over the WNP, which are in good agreement with the regression pattern associated with the March NAO (Figs. 2a, 3a–c, 5a, b). The individual variances explained by this mode for SLP and for SST is 46% and 12%, respectively. The correlation coefficient between the time series of the expansion coefficients of the left and right fields is 0.50, which exceeds the 99% confidence level. The above analysis suggests that a robust relationship does exist between the March NAO and WNP tripole SSTA pattern (Fig. 5c).
Additionally, the Rossby wave train associated with the March NAO propagates southeastward and reaches the northern Arabian Sea and neighboring areas, contributing to an equivalent barotropic anticyclone locally (Fig. 3a–c). Gong et al. (2014) have indicated that the AO influences precipitation in the tropical Indian Ocean by an analogous path of wave-activity during the boreal winter. The enhanced Arabian High brings stronger northerly wind over the southeastern Arabian Sea, inducing significant negative SSTAs and below-normal precipitation during March–April (Figs. 2a, 4a). In turn, the negative precipitation anomalies over the southeastern Arabian Sea maintain the anticyclone. The anomalous SST and precipitation pattern over the Arabian Sea during March–April favor the weakening of the summer monsoon in the tropical western Indian Ocean during May–June. This is verified by May–June averaged regression of surface wind and SST against the March–April precipitation index derived by area-averaging precipitation anomalies over the 0°–10° N, 60°–80° E region (not shown).
4.2 Roles of atmospheric circulation over the WNP on IOD development
Here, we discuss the roles of the WNP anomalous cyclone associated with the March NAO in the occurrence and development of the IOD. During May–June, with the onset of the Asian summer monsoon, the WNP cyclone maintenance enhances the cross-equatorial southerly wind, which turns into southeasterly and southwesterly winds off Sumatra–Java and to the north of the equator, respectively, aided by the Coriolis force (Figs. 2b, 4b; Zhang et al. 2018; Lu and Ren 2020). The increased lower-level southerly wind brings abundant moisture to the WNP, favorable for the development of local precipitation and cyclonic circulation. In contrast, the southeasterly wind off Sumatra–Java promotes cooling, which suppresses local convection and induces below-normal precipitation. Correspondingly, strong surface convergence and upper-level divergence are observed over the WNP during May–June, with the opposite occurring over the TSEIO (Fig. 6a, b). Concurrently, anomalous local meridional circulation becomes established with the ascent over the WNP and descent over the TSEIO and Maritime Continent (Fig. S3a). As indicated by Zhang et al. (2018), the development of a south–north precipitation dipole, featuring above-normal precipitation over the WNP and below-normal precipitation over the TSEIO and Maritime Continent, is conducive to northward lower-level and southward upper-level wind, suggesting an enhanced local meridional circulation. In turn, such enhancement reinforces the south–north precipitation dipole (Figs. 4b, 6a, b, S3a). This positive feedback is favorable for reinforcing the related anomalous circulation and precipitation during May–August, particularly for the TSEIO southeasterly wind (Figs. 4b, c, 6a–d, S3a, b). In conclusion, the WNP anomalous cyclone is beneficial to the development of southeasterly wind anomalies and cooling over the TSEIO.
It is known that the southeasterly wind anomalies off Sumatra–Java during May–June are key triggers for the IOD (Saji et al. 1999; Li et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2022). The significant southeasterly wind anomalies off Sumatra, superimposed on the climatological southeasterly wind, enhance WES feedback, inducing upward latent heat flux transport and contributing to the cooling and depressed convection over the TSEIO (Figs. 2b, 4b; Xie and Philander 1994; Li et al. 2003; Cai et al. 2013). Moreover, the enhancement of the southeasterly wind over the TESIO strengthens coastal upwelling and shoaling of the thermocline, promoting cooling through positive wind–thermocline–SST feedback (Figs. 2b, 7b; Saji et al. 1999; Cai et al. 2013). As a Rossby wave response of negative diabatic heating over the TSEIO, two anticyclonic circulations develop over its northwestern and southwestern regions along with the anomalous easterly wind over the equatorial Indian Ocean (Gill 1980). This anomalous equatorial easterly wind forces the warm water to accumulate westward (Figs. 2b, 4b, e). Furthermore, significant easterly and northerly wind anomalies appear in the south of the Arabian Sea and off the East Africa during May–June, respectively, suggesting a weakened summer monsoon (Figs. 2b, 4b; Yu et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2022). Such wind anomalies weaken the WES feedback and coastal upwelling off the East Africa, further inducing significant positive SSTAs over the tropical western Indian Ocean (Fig. 2b). During July–August, the southeasterly wind anomalies off Sumatra–Java become stronger, accompanied by the enhancement of local meridional circulation between the TSEIO and WNP (Figs. 2c, 4c, S3b). Moreover, the east–west SST gradient in the tropical Indian Ocean strengthens the easterly wind anomalies over the equatorial Indian Ocean, leading to further warming of the western pole and cooling of the eastern pole. Consequently, a typical dipole mode is established in autumn (Fig. 2d).
The oceanic wave associated with surface wind anomalies is another important factor in IOD development (Yuan and Liu 2009; Wang and Yuan 2015; Effy et al. 2020). We examined the thermocline variation represented by the SSH, as was used in Rao and Behera (2005) and Wang et al. (2016). On the one hand, the local southeasterly wind anomalies off Sumatra uplift the thermocline locally (Murtugudde et al. 2000; Rao et al. 2002). On the other hand, forced by equatorial easterly wind anomalies, the upwelling Kelvin waves propagate eastward, shoaling the thermocline over the eastern Indian Ocean and contributing to local cooling (Figs. 2b–d, 4b, c, 7b–d, S4b; Murtugudde et al. 2000; Rao et al. 2002). Meanwhile, the anticyclone wind stress curl excites the downwelling Rossby waves propagating westward, which are stronger in the southern than in the northern Indian Ocean, subsequently deepening the thermocline and facilitating warming over the western Indian Ocean (Figs. 2b–d, 4b, c, 7b–d, S4a, and S4c; Xie et al. 2002; Effy et al. 2020).
4.3 LBM numerical experiment
We conducted LBM experiments to verify the feedback role of precipitation on atmospheric circulation. The heating region was determined according to the precipitation pattern associated with the March NAO. As regards the WNP above-normal precipitation during March–April, the key positive heating source is situated over a region (8°–16° N, 125°–160° E) with its center at 12° N and 142.5°E (Figs. 4a, d, 8a). The area-averaged diabatic heating profile has a maximum of approximately 0.65 K day–1 at the sigma of 0.45, with the same value used as input for the LBM (not shown). The results show that a cyclone is stimulated over the northwest of the heating region and extends meridionally as noted in the observation (Figs. 2a, 3c, 4a, 8d). The strongest westerly wind anomalies are observed on the southern flank of the cyclone, beneficial to the equatorward development of cyclone (Fig. 8d). Such circulation indicates that the WNP above-normal precipitation during March–April, in turn, favors the development and equatorward shift of the cyclone.
The heating source corresponding to the WNP precipitation pattern during May–August is located a region at 5°–20° N, 150°–180° E. The heating center at 12.5° N and 165° E is located more eastward than in March–April, and the area-averaged diabatic heating profile has a maximum of 0.5 K day–1 at the sigma of 0.45 (Figs. 4a–f, 8a, b). The results indicate that a zonally extending cyclone develops over the WNP, agreeing well with the observation (Figs. 2b, c, 3d, 4b, c, 8e). The heating source linked to below-normal precipitation over the TSEIO and Maritime Continent during May–August is situated over a region at 10° S–5° N, 90°–130° E, with its center at 2.5° S and 110° E. The minimum of the area-averaged diabatic heating profile is approximately − 0.6 K day–1 at the sigma of 0.45 (Fig. 4b, c, e, f). As a Rossby wave response, anticyclonic circulations appear in the northwestern and southwestern sides of the heating region. Correspondingly, anomalous southeasterly and easterly winds develop off Sumatra and the equatorial Indian Ocean, respectively, which are favorable for the development of the IOD (Fig. 8c, f). The low pressure can be noted over the WNP, suggesting the role of negative precipitation anomalies over the Maritime Continent on the cyclones over the WNP. Although the LBM experimental results do not exactly support this observation owing to a lack of feedback from the LBM, the feedback role of precipitation on the local atmospheric circulation is confirmed.
5 Ocean mixed-layer heat budget associated with March NAO
To investigate the relative contribution of the net surface heat flux and ocean dynamic process associated with the March NAO to IOD development, we diagnosed the ocean mixed-layer heat budget equation. First, each term in the heat budget equation was calculated, after which we conducted regression analysis against the March NAO. The evolution and peak of forcing, defined as the sum of zonal, meridional, and vertical advection, and the net surface heat flux, show consistence with the mixed-layer temperature (MLT) tendency. This finding is similar to the results of Hong et al. (2008a, b). The result is verified by correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.79 between forcing and the MLT tendency for the eastern and western poles of the IOD, respectively (Fig. 9). As stated in Sect. 2, some residuals can probably be ascribed to the coarse temporal and spatial resolution of the datasets, different data sources for ocean and heat flux, and uncertainties in parameterization (Huang et al. 2010).
As the eastern pole of the IOD, the negative MLT tendency starts developing from May, attains a peak during August, and turns positive during October–December. Cold MLT anomalies prevail during the entire IOD development phase, and are the strongest during September–October, agreeing with the SSTAs (Figs. 2a–d, 9a). Determining the contributions of different components to the MLT tendency, we found that the cold MLT tendency primarily results from negative 3-D ocean advection during the development stage of IOD, particularly negative vertical ocean advection (Fig. 9a, b). The net surface heat flux shows a weak positive contribution during mid-June–September, as the large positive downward shortwave radiation flux offsets the negative latent heat flux and longwave radiation flux, suggesting the dominance of negative SST–cloud–radiation feedback (Hong et al. 2008b) over positive WES feedback (Figs. 9b, S5a). After October, strong positive net surface heat flux, resulting from positive net shortwave radiation flux, latent heat flux, and sensible heat flux, plays a key role in damping the cold MLT anomalies of the eastern pole (Figs. 9a, b, S5a). Our finding agrees with the results of previous studies (Li et al. 2002; Sun et al. 2014; Jiang et al. 2022).
As the western pole of the IOD, the positive MLT tendency develops during April–mid-June and September–December, mainly resulting from positive vertical ocean advection (Fig. 9c, d). During July–August, negative meridional and zonal ocean advection and net surface heat flux induce the negative MLT tendency, weakening warm MLT anomalies (Fig. 9c, d). Therefore, the warmest MLT anomalies occur in June and December (Fig. 9c). Negative net surface heat flux during May–September and October–December result from negative latent heat flux and negative net downward shortwave radiation flux, respectively (Figs. 9d, S5b). The development of both eastern and western poles is dominated by the ocean process, particularly vertical ocean advection. However, net surface heat flux has adverse effects on the MLT anomalies of the eastern and western poles during their development stages.
6 Summary
This study demonstrated a significant correlation between the March NAO and the subsequent boreal summer and autumn IOD, even after the removal of preceding winter–spring ENSO and IOBM signals. Focusing on the importance of WNP air–sea interaction, we revealed the triggering mechanism of the March NAO for the subsequent IOD through the reanalysis data and LBM simulation, as shown schematically in Fig. 10.
First, a strong March NAO induces equivalent barotropic cyclonic circulation over the WNP through a steady Rossby wave. The anomalous low-level cyclone stimulates a tripole SSTA pattern over the WNP by changing the surface heat flux and Ekman pumping in the ocean. The SSTAs, in turn, contribute to the development and equatorward displacement of cyclonic circulation by inducing anomalous precipitation and diabatic heating. Such air–sea positive feedback maintains the cyclone over the subtropical WNP from early spring to summer.
Subsequently, anomalous WNP cyclonic circulations and precipitation during May–August reinforce southeasterly wind off Sumatra and cooling of the IOD eastern pole through local meridional circulation, which ascends over the subtropical WNP and descends over the TSEIO and Maritime Continent. Concurrently, equatorial easterly wind anomalies and northerly wind anomalies off the East Africa induce warming of the IOD western pole.
Finally, WES and wind–thermocline–SST positive feedback contribute to the development of the IOD in summer and autumn. The Arabian Sea anomalous anticyclone, associated with a southeast-propagating Rossby wave induced by the March NAO, is also important to IOD development. Moreover, thermocline shoaling, which results from eastward upwelling Kelvin waves and local upwelling, facilitates cooling over the TSEIO. Thermocline deepening, resulting from westward downwelling Rossby waves, is beneficial to warming in the tropical western Indian Ocean, particularly in the southwest of the ocean. The diagnosis of a MLT heat budget indicates that the ocean dynamic process associated with the March NAO contributes more to the development of the IOD than does the net surface heat flux.
Our results indicated the influence of mid–high latitude circulation anomalies over the Northern Hemisphere on the occurrence of the IOD. This finding could provide a new cue to improve the seasonal prediction of the IOD. In future, we aim to improve our understanding of this physical process by employing the air–sea coupled model.
Data availability
All the datasets in this paper are available publicly from the following websites: SST from https://psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.noaa.ersst.v5.html; ECMWF Reanalysis V5 dataset from https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/search?type=dataset; SSH dataset from https://www.cen.uni-hamburg.de/en/icdc/data/ocean/easy-init-ocean/ecmwf-ocean-reanalysis-system-4-oras4.html; NCEP GODAS datasets from https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/GODAS/; Surface heat flux dataset from https://incois.gov.in/tropflux/; and Linear baroclinic model (LBM) from https://ccsr.aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~lbm/sub/lbm.html.
References
Annamalai H, Murtugudde R, Potemra J et al (2003) Coupled dynamics over the Indian Ocean: spring initiation of the Zonal Mode. Deep-Sea Res Part II-Top Stud Oceanogr 50:2305–2330. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(03)00058-4
Balmaseda MA, Mogensen K, Weaver AT (2013) Evaluation of the ECMWF ocean reanalysis system ORAS4. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139:1132–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2063
Behringer DW, Xue Y (2004) Evaluation of the global ocean data assimilation sysytem at NCEP: the Pacific Ocean. Eighth Symposium on Integrated Observing and Assimilation Systems for Atmosphere, Oceans, and Land Surface, AMS 84th Annual Meeting, Washington State Convention and Trade Center, Seattle, Washington 11–15
Boer GJ (1986) A comparison of mass and energy budgets from 2 fgge-datasets and a gcm. Mon Weather Rev 114:885–902. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114%3c0885:Acomae%3e2.0.Co;2
Cai WJ, Zheng XT, Weller E et al (2013) Projected response of the Indian Ocean Dipole to greenhouse warming. Nat Geosci 6:999–1007. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2009
Cai WJ, Santoso A, Wang GJ et al (2014) Increased frequency of extreme Indian Ocean Dipole events due to greenhouse warming. Nature 510:254. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13327
Chen SF, Yu B, Chen W (2014) An analysis on the physical process of the influence of AO on ENSO. Clim Dyn 42:973–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1654-z
Chen G, Han W, Li Y et al (2015) Seasonal-to-interannual time-scale dynamics of the equatorial undercurrent in the Indian Ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 45:1532–1553. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-14-0225.1
Chen G, Han W, Li Y et al (2016a) Interannual variability of equatorial Eastern Indian Ocean upwelling: local versus remote forcing. J Phys Oceanogr 46:789–807. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-15-0117.1
Chen G, Han W, Shu Y et al (2016b) The role of equatorial undercurrent in sustaining the Eastern Indian Ocean upwelling. Geophys Res Lett 43:6444–6451. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl069433
Chen P, Sun B, Wang HJ et al (2021) Possible impacts of December Laptev Sea Ice on Indian Ocean dipole conditions during spring. J Clim 34:6927–6943. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0980.1
Chiang JCH, Vimont DJ (2004) Analogous Pacific and Atlantic meridional modes of tropical atmosphere-ocean variability. J Clim 17:4143–4158. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4953.1
Cui YF, Duan AM, Liu YM et al (2015) Interannual variability of the spring atmospheric heat source over the Tibetan Plateau forced by the North Atlantic SSTA. Clim Dyn 45:1617–1634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2417-9
Dong S, Gille ST, Sprintall J (2007) An assessment of the Southern Ocean mixed layer heat budget. J Clim 20:4425–4442. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4259.1
Drbohlav HKL, Gualdi S, Navarra A (2007) A diagnostic study of the Indian Ocean dipole mode in El Nino and non-El Nino years. J Clim 20:2961–2977. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4153.1
Du Y, Qu TD, Meyers G et al (2005) Seasonal heat budget in the mixed layer of the southeastern tropical Indian Ocean in a high-resolution ocean general circulation model. J Geophys Res-Oceans 110:15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jc002845
Du Y, Cai WJ, Wu YL (2013) A new type of the Indian Ocean dipole since the mid-1970s. J Clim 26:959–972. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00047.1
Du Y, Zhang Y, Zhang LY et al (2020) Thermocline warming induced extreme Indian Ocean dipole in 2019. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl090079
Effy JB, Francis PA, Ramakrishna SSVS et al (2020) Anomalous warming of the western equatorial Indian Ocean in 2007: role of ocean dynamics. Ocean Model. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.101542
Endo S, Tozuka T (2016) Two flavors of the Indian Ocean Dipole. Clim Dyn 46:3371–3385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2773-0
Fan L, Liu QY, Wang CZ et al (2017) Indian Ocean dipole modes associated with different types of ENSO development. J Clim 30:2233–2249. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0426.1
Fan HJ, Huang BH, Yang S et al (2021) Influence of the Pacific Meridional Mode on ENSO evolution and predictability: asymmetric modulation and ocean preconditioning. J Clim 34:1881–1901. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0109.1
Feng J, Hu D, Yu L (2014) How does the Indian Ocean subtropical dipole trigger the tropical Indian Ocean dipole via the Mascarene high? Acta Oceanol Sin 33:64–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0425-6
Fischer AS, Terray P, Guilyardi E et al (2005) Two independent triggers for the Indian ocean dipole/zonal mode in a coupled GCM. J Clim 18:3428–3449. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3478.1
Gill AE (1980) Some simple solutions for heat-induced tropical circulation. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:447–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644905
Gong DY, Yang J, Kim SJ et al (2011) Spring Arctic Oscillation-East Asian summer monsoon connection through circulation changes over the western North Pacific. Clim Dyn 37:2199–2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1041-1
Gong DY, Gao Y, Guo D et al (2014) Interannual linkage between Arctic/North Atlantic Oscillation and tropical Indian Ocean precipitation during boreal winter. Clim Dyn 42:1007–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1681-4
Gong DY, Guo D, Li S et al (2017a) Winter AO/NAO modifies summer ocean heat content and monsoonal circulation over the Western Indian Ocean. J Meteorol Res 31:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-017-6175-6
Gong DY, Guo D, Gao YQ et al (2017b) Boreal winter Arctic Oscillation as an indicator of summer SST anomalies over the western tropical Indian Ocean. Clim Dyn 48:2471–2488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3216-2
Guo FY, Liu QY, Sun S et al (2015) Three types of Indian Ocean dipoles. J Clim 28:3073–3092. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00507.1
Guo FY, Liu QY, Yang JL et al (2018) Three types of Indian Ocean Basin modes. Clim Dyn 51:4357–4370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3676-z
He B, Liu YM, Wu GX et al (2019) The role of air-sea interactions in regulating the thermal effect of the Tibetan-Iranian Plateau on the Asian summer monsoon. Clim Dyn 52:4227–4245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4377-y
Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P et al (2020) The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 146:1999–2049. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803
Hong CC, Lu MM, Kanamitsu M (2008a) Temporal and spatial characteristics of positive and negative Indian Ocean dipole with and without ENSO. J Geophys Res-Atmos 113:15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009151
Hong CC, Li T, Ho L et al (2008b) Asymmetry of the Indian Ocean dipole. Part I: observational analysis. J Clim 21:4834–4848. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2222.1
Hu P, Chen W, Chen SF et al (2021) Impact of the March Arctic Oscillation on the South China Sea summer monsoon onset. Int J Climatol 41:E3239–E3248. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6920
Huang BH, Shukla J (2007) Mechanisms for the interannual variability in the tropical Indian Ocean. Part II: regional processes. J Clim 20:2937–2960. https://doi.org/10.1175/Jcli4169.1
Huang BY, Xue Y, Zhang DX et al (2010) The NCEP GODAS ocean analysis of the tropical Pacific mixed layer heat budget on seasonal to interannual time scales. J Clim 23:4901–4925. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jcli3373.1
Huang BY, Thorne PW, Banzon VF et al (2017) Extended reconstructed sea surface temperature, Version 5 (ERSSTv5): upgrades, validations, and intercomparisons. J Clim 30:8179–8205. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0836.1
Huang BC, Su T, Qu SL et al (2021) Strengthened relationship between tropical Indian Ocean Dipole and Subtropical Indian Ocean Dipole after the late 2000s. Geophys Res Lett 48:11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl094835
Hurrell JW, Deser C (2009) North Atlantic climate variability: the role of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J Mar Syst 78:28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.026
Jiang JL, Liu YM, Mao JY et al (2022) Three types of positive Indian Ocean dipoles and their relationships with the South Asian Summer Monsoon. J Clim 35:405–424. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-21-0089.1
Kajikawa Y, Yasunari T, Kawamura R (2003) The role of the local hadley circulation over the western Pacific on the zonally asymmetric anomalies over the Indian Ocean. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 81:259–276. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.81.259
Krishnan R, Swapna P (2009) Significant influence of the Boreal Summer Monsoon flow on the Indian Ocean response during dipole events. J Clim 22:5611–5634. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jcli2176.1
Kumar BP, Vialard J, Lengaigne M et al (2012) TropFlux: air-sea fluxes for the global tropical oceans-description and evaluation. Clim Dyn 38:1521–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1115-0
Lee SK, Lopez H, Foltz GR et al (2022) Java-Sumatra Niño/Niña and its impact on regional rainfall variability. J Clim 35(13):4291–4308. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-21-0616.1
Li XY, Lu RY (2017) Extratropical factors affecting the variability in summer precipitation over the Yangtze River Basin, China. J Clim 30:8357–8374. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0282.1
Li JP, Wang JXL (2003) A new North Atlantic Oscillation index and its variability. Adv Atmos Sci 20:661–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02915394
Li T, Zhang YS, Lu E et al (2002) Relative role of dynamic and thermodynamic processes in the development of the Indian Ocean dipole: an OGCM diagnosis. Geophys Res Lett 29:4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002gl015789
Li T, Wang B, Chang CP et al (2003) A theory for the Indian Ocean dipole-zonal mode. J Atmos Sci 60:2119–2135. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3c2119:Atftio%3e2.0.Co;2
Liu YM, Wu GX, Liu H et al (2001) Condensation heating of the Asian summer monsoon and the subtropical anticyclone in the Eastern Hemisphere. Clim Dyn 17:327–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820000117
Liu QY, Feng M, Wang D et al (2015) Interannual variability of the Indonesian throughflow transport: a revisit based on 30 year expendable bathythermograph data. J Geophys Res-Oceans 120:8270–8282. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011351
Liu XL, Liu YM, Wang XC et al (2020) Large-scale dynamics and moisture sources of the precipitation over the Western Tibetan Plateau in Boreal Winter. J Geophys Res-Atmos 125:18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd032133
Lu B, Ren HL (2020) What caused the extreme Indian Ocean Dipole event in 2019? Geophys Res Lett 47:8. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL087768
Mao J, Wang M (2018) The 30–60-day intraseasonal variability of sea surface temperature in the South China Sea during May–September. Adv Atmos Sci 35:550–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-017-7127-x
Murtugudde R, McCreary JP, Busalacchi AJ (2000) Oceanic processes associated with anomalous events in the Indian Ocean with relevance to 1997–1998. J Geophys Res-Oceans 105:3295–3306. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jc900294
Nakamura T, Tachibana Y, Honda M et al (2006) Influence of the Northern Hemisphere annular mode on ENSO by modulating westerly wind bursts. Geophys Res Lett 33:4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025432
Nakamura T, Tachibana Y, Shimoda H (2007) Importance of cold and dry surges in substantiating the NAM and ENSO relationship. Geophys Res Lett 34:4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl031220
Oshika M, Tachibana Y, Nakamura T (2015) Impact of the winter North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on the Western Pacific (WP) pattern in the following winter through Arctic sea ice and ENSO: part I-observational evidence. Clim Dyn 45:1355–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2384-1
Paulson CA, Simpson JJ (1977) Irradiance measurements in upper ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 7:952–956. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1977)007%3c0952:Imituo%3e2.0.Co;2
Rao SA, Behera SK (2005) Subsurface influence on SST in the tropical Indian Ocean: structure and interannual variability. Dyn Atmos Oceans 39:103–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2004.10.014
Rao SA, Behera SK, Masumoto Y et al (2002) Interannual subsurface variability in the tropical Indian Ocean with a special emphasis on the Indian Ocean Dipole. Deep-Sea Res Part II-Top Stud Oceanogr 49:1549–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0645(01)00158-8
Rodwell MJ, Hoskins BJ (2001) Subtropical anticyclones and summer monsoons. J Clim 14:3192–3211. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014%3c3192:Saasm%3e2.0.Co;2
Saji NH, Yamagata T (2003) Possible impacts of Indian Ocean Dipole mode events on global climate. Clim Res 25:151–169. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr025151
Saji NH, Goswami BN, Vinayachandran PN et al (1999) A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean. Nature 401:360–363. https://doi.org/10.1038/43854
Stuecker MF, Timmermann A, Jin FF et al (2017) Revisiting ENSO/Indian Ocean Dipole phase relationships. Geophys Res Lett 44:2481–2492. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072308
Sun SW, Fang Y, Tana et al (2014) Dynamical mechanisms for asymmetric SSTA patterns associated with some Indian Ocean Dipoles. J Geophys Res-Oceans 119:3076–3097. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009651
Sun SW, Lan J, Fang Y et al (2015) A triggering mechanism for the Indian Ocean Dipoles independent of ENSO. J Clim 28:5063–5076. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00580.1
Takaya K, Nakamura H (2001) A formulation of a phase-independent wave-activity flux for stationary and migratory quasigeostrophic eddies on a zonally varying basic flow. J Atmos Sci 58:608–627. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2001)058%3c0608:Afoapi%3e2.0.Co;2
Trenberth KE (1997) The definition of El Nino. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2771–2777. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078%3c2771:Tdoeno%3e2.0.Co;2
Trenberth KE, Solomon A (1994) The global heat-balance-heat transports in the atmosphere and ocean. Clim Dyn 10:107–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00210625
Valsala V, Sreeush MG, Chakraborty K (2020) The IOD impacts on the Indian Ocean carbon cycle. J Geophys Res-Oceans. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jc016485
Wang J, Yuan D (2015) Roles of Western and Eastern boundary reflections in the interannual sea level variations during negative Indian Ocean Dipole events. J Phys Oceanogr 45:1804–1821. https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-14-0124.1
Wang H, Murtugudde R, Kumar A (2016) Evolution of Indian Ocean dipole and its forcing mechanisms in the absence of ENSO. Clim Dyn 47:2481–2500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-2977-y
Watanabe M, Kimoto M (2000) Atmosphere-ocean thermal coupling in the North Atlantic: a positive feedback. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126:3343–3369. https://doi.org/10.1256/smsqj.57016
Watanabe M, Jin FF (2003) A moist linear baroclinic model: coupled dynamical-convective response to El Niño. J Clim 16:1121–1139. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)16%3c1121:Amlbmc%3e2.0.Co;2
Watanabe M, Jin FF, Kimoto M (2002) Tropical axisymmetric mode of variability in the atmospheric circulation: dynamics as a neutral mode. J Clim 15:1537–1554. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c1537:Tamovi%3e2.0.Co;2
Webster PJ, Moore AM, Loschnigg JP et al (1999) Coupled ocean-atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–98. Nature 401:356–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/43848
Wu ZW, Wang B, Li JP et al (2009) An empirical seasonal prediction model of the east Asian summer monsoon using ENSO and NAO. J Geophys Res-Atmos 114:13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011733
Xia Y, Guan Z, Long Y (2019) Relationships between convective activity in the Maritime Continent and precipitation anomalies in Southwest China during boreal summer. Clim Dyn 54:973–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-05039-x
Xiang BQ, Yu WD, Li T et al (2011) The critical role of the boreal summer mean state in the development of the IOD. Geophys Res Lett 38:5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl045851
Xie SP, Philander SGH (1994) A coupled ocean-atmosphere model of relevance to the ITCZ in the eastern Pacific. Tellus Ser A-Dyn Meteorol Oceanol 46:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0870.1994.t01-1-00001.x
Xie SP, Annamalai H, Schott FA et al (2002) Structure and mechanisms of South Indian Ocean climate variability. J Clim 15:864–878. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c0864:Samosi%3e2.0.Co;2
Xu K, Miao HY, Liu B et al (2020) Aggravation of record-breaking drought over the mid-to-lower reaches of the Yangtze River in the Post-monsoon Season of 2019 by anomalous Indo-Pacific Oceanic conditions. GeophYs Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl090847
Yu W, Liu YM, Yang XQ et al (2021) Impact of North Atlantic SST and Tibetan Plateau forcing on seasonal transition of springtime South Asian monsoon circulation. Clim Dyn 56:559–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05491-0
Yuan D, Liu H (2009) Long-wave dynamics of sea level variations during Indian Ocean Dipole events. J Phys Oceanogr 39:1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jpo3900.1
Yue Z, Zhou W, Li T (2021) Impact of the Indian Ocean Dipole on evolution of the subsequent ENSO: relative roles of dynamic and thermodynamic processes. J Clim. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-20-0487.1
Zhang WJ, Wang YL, Jin FF et al (2015) Impact of different El Nino types on the El Nino/IOD relationship. Geophys Res Lett 42:8570–8576. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015gl065703
Zhang YZ, Li JP, Xue JQ et al (2018) Impact of the South China Sea Summer Monsoon on the Indian Ocean Dipole. J Clim 31:6557–6573. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-17-0815.1
Zhang YZ, Li JP, Xue JQ et al (2019) The relative roles of the South China Sea summer monsoon and ENSO in the Indian Ocean dipole development. Clim Dyn 53:6665–6680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04953-4
Zhang LY, Du Y, Cai WJ et al (2020) Triggering the Indian Ocean Dipole from the southern hemisphere. Geophys Res Lett 47:9. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088648
Zhang W, Mao W, Jiang F et al (2021) Tropical Indo-Pacific compounding thermal conditions drive the 2019 Australian extreme drought. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl090323
Zhang GL, Wang X, Xie Q et al (2022) Strengthening impacts of spring sea surface temperature in the north tropical Atlantic on Indian Ocean dipole after the mid-1980s. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-021-06128-6
Funding
The work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB40030204) and Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2020B0301030004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JJ and YL contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JJ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by JJ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiang, J., Liu, Y. Impact of March North Atlantic Oscillation on Indian Ocean Dipole: role of air–sea interaction over the Western North Pacific. Clim Dyn 61, 1089–1104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06583-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06583-9